Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 or 996?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2012, 01:30 PM
  #1  
Winterreise
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Winterreise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 964 or 996?

Hello All:

Happy Thanksgiving! I have been ruminating on this for a while and thought I would do well to ask this question here to see what might guide me to the best decision. My purchase budget for a 911 narrows me down to two models. The 1989 - 93 Porsche 964 or the 1999 - 2002 Porsche 996. I am tempted to buy the 964 mainly because the air cooled flat 6 is so reliable and seemed to benefit from a more perfectionist attitude from Porsche when it was designed. The 996 with its water cooled 6 is much newer, more modern designed, fast and a bit more comfortable for a daily driver (which it would be). My main concern, of course, is the IMS design flaw that, if it grenades would cost me the price of the car to repair / replace the engine. I am aware that the Flat Six LN retrofit may solve the problem but if I found these two cars with similar mileage, which way should I go for longevity and reliability?
Your thoughts would be most welcome.
Thanks in advance!
Bob
Old 11-23-2012, 01:47 PM
  #2  
JLJ11
Rennlist Member
 
JLJ11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

964! maintainance costs prob higher but smile on face will more than make up for it. Do you have links for the cars you are considering? If you take the necessary care of the engine she will reward u back. I just hit 190k in one of mine and it still feels brand new.
Old 11-23-2012, 03:47 PM
  #3  
Makmov
Drifting
 
Makmov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Winterreise
Hello All:

Happy Thanksgiving! I have been ruminating on this for a while and thought I would do well to ask this question here to see what might guide me to the best decision. My purchase budget for a 911 narrows me down to two models. The 1989 - 93 Porsche 964 or the 1999 - 2002 Porsche 996. I am tempted to buy the 964 mainly because the air cooled flat 6 is so reliable and seemed to benefit from a more perfectionist attitude from Porsche when it was designed. The 996 with its water cooled 6 is much newer, more modern designed, fast and a bit more comfortable for a daily driver (which it would be). My main concern, of course, is the IMS design flaw that, if it grenades would cost me the price of the car to repair / replace the engine. I am aware that the Flat Six LN retrofit may solve the problem but if I found these two cars with similar mileage, which way should I go for longevity and reliability?
Your thoughts would be most welcome.
Thanks in advance!
Bob
IMS failure usually gives plenty of notice before grenading an engine. It's just short of 20K to do an engine after a complete IMS engine failure. Or you spend a grand or so pull the transaxle replace the offending parts along with a RMS and sleep in peace.

No way of saying which will have less probems and last longer. You could have a faultless 964 that will give you many years of enjoyment as much as you could a 996. I lot will depend on its life up to the point were you take over stewardship and how you keep up with it.

From a purists POV its no contest. There is a reason 996s are so cheap to buy.
Old 11-23-2012, 09:33 PM
  #4  
lmazzoli
Instructor
 
lmazzoli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Solon, OH
Posts: 109
Received 5 Likes on 1 Post
Default

You are asking this question on the 964 Forum? - I vote 964.
Old 11-23-2012, 10:32 PM
  #5  
FastStreet
Track Day
 
FastStreet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Makmov
IMS failure usually gives plenty of notice before grenading an engine. It's just short of 20K to do an engine after a complete IMS engine failure. Or you spend a grand or so pull the transaxle replace the offending parts along with a RMS and sleep in peace.

No way of saying which will have less probems and last longer. You could have a faultless 964 that will give you many years of enjoyment as much as you could a 996. I lot will depend on its life up to the point were you take over stewardship and how you keep up with it.

From a purists POV its no contest. There is a reason 996s are so cheap to buy.
A nice na C4S 996 will go regularly in the 30k - 35k range. Now that the IMS fix has being recognized the prices have stabilized. Its a great car for the money no doubt. Actually so is the 964. Tough choice.
Old 11-23-2012, 10:48 PM
  #6  
FeralComprehension
Rennlist Member
 
FeralComprehension's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit (Rock City); 1990 C4
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

964 is more true pure 911.

IMO.
Old 11-23-2012, 10:59 PM
  #7  
Makmov
Drifting
 
Makmov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FastStreet
A nice na C4S 996 will go regularly in the 30k - 35k range. Now that the IMS fix has being recognized the prices have stabilized. Its a great car for the money no doubt. Actually so is the 964. Tough choice.
Yeah but you can get an average run of the mill 996 for in the teens, easy, and not hard to find.
Old 11-23-2012, 11:02 PM
  #8  
street rod
Drifting
 
street rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,234
Received 222 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

You can find them in the teens but a well sorted one worth buying will normally be higher. Even still its a very good value.
Old 11-23-2012, 11:29 PM
  #9  
Makmov
Drifting
 
Makmov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,274
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porsche87
You can find them in the teens but a well sorted one worth buying will normally be higher. Even still its a very good value.
Didn't know there was any well sorted ones. I thought people just drove 996s into the dirt.
Old 11-23-2012, 11:59 PM
  #10  
pmalenfa
Racer
 
pmalenfa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Winterreise
... if I found these two cars with similar mileage, which way should I go for longevity and reliability?
I put my air cooled brain aside for a moment...

A similar milleage 964 will have more value, considering it's age (it would have run less miles per year and benefit of a similar yearly maintenance). But even at low miles, a bad 964 can be a nightmare. So from a longevity and reliability perspective (aka running cost), you should think in term of condition and not pure mileage. All p-cars are expensive to repair major issues, please make a proper PPI before buying ANY first Porsche.

OK, I take back my brain.... 964 !!!
Old 11-24-2012, 01:27 AM
  #11  
Reston911
Intermediate
 
Reston911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Reston Va.
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The original poster mentioned it would likely be a daily driver. I have owned my 964 for 12 years, and consider it a great automobile, but would not recommend any 10-20 year old sportscar (964-996) a daily driver, even a porsche.. Yes, it can be done, but not my choice for dialy driving, at least in my neck of the woods.
Old 11-24-2012, 08:30 AM
  #12  
JLJ11
Rennlist Member
 
JLJ11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I daily drive a 993 and for years daily drove a 964. I totally recommend it. I'm careful about how i treat it and its never let me down. I can understand some peoples reluctance but should not be a factor to put you off pursuing a 911.
Old 11-24-2012, 12:24 PM
  #13  
hans57
Instructor
 
hans57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FeralComprehension
964 is more true pure 911.

IMO.

+1
Old 11-24-2012, 12:28 PM
  #14  
falcor
Racer
 
falcor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spend X amount of money into a car today and drive it for 3-4 years....do all the maintenance on both cars (964 will cost more to service) but will hardly depreciate at all. For the 996 you'd be lucky to get more than 50-60% back on what you purchased it for.
Old 11-24-2012, 02:00 PM
  #15  
vaughan 88 911
Advanced
 
vaughan 88 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: texas
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Bob, Here's a few options.
1. Have a PPI done on both of them. Select the one that gets the best inspection. Get a warranty if you can.
2. Inspect it yourself. Check for oil leaks, undercarriage damage, Listen to the engine at various rpm's. Look for body panel alignment. Drive each one, pick your favorite. Good luck.
3. Wait for another used Porsche to come into the equation.

I owned a 996 for a year. It was OK. I couldn't get comfortable in the stock seat though. I own a 964 now. Fits like a glove. As far as reliability, depends on condition, and depends on maintenance history. If maintained, both Porsches should have good reliability.


Quick Reply: 964 or 996?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:49 AM.