Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

bhp of your 964

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2010, 01:42 PM
  #31  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,177
Received 1,935 Likes on 1,170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meek
Yes, you are absolutely right about heat-valve guide wear, but the issue is whether or not the undertray worsens/improves/does nothing to engine temp, which nobody has been able to prove/disprove as yet i.e. conjecture. I doubt anyone ever will. It probably traps heat at idle, but again, nobody has proved this. It is possible that it improves cooling at speed, but we don't know for sure. All we have is personal experience and mine is that my temp gauge acts in the same way at idle or at speed with the tray on or off; all UK weathers, all ambient temps, driven hard and fast and pootling along.

This is why I said 'so much posted on this already, won't repeat it again' - all this has been discussed and disagreed on before.
Adam,

Of course i can't prove it however, my mechanic who works on numerous 964's and 993's says he has seen a significantly higher failure rate on cars witch retained their under tray vs not. I personally had much higher running temperatures prior to removing my under tray which to me is proof enough it holds in heat. The factory did not supply the 964 turbo with an under tray because they were aware of the problem it would create as early as the 3.3l motors and especially on the 3.6 T.
Old 04-30-2010, 02:00 PM
  #32  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,172
Received 507 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

I'd go even further and suggest you remove the transmission undertray as well. It helps air flow in the area even better.
Old 04-30-2010, 02:02 PM
  #33  
meek
Burning Brakes
 
meek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh well, Anthony, we aren't going to agree; unless I change my mind at a later date, which is always possible Any Turbo engined car has major heat generating issues compared to an NA. Oh, and my mechanic agrees with yours, though when pushed, he really doesn't know for sure. My 964 has now done 108k, with the tray on, still has 5% across all six cylinders and no wobbly valves. Damn,now I have said that, you know what I will be f$x$ng next service!

EDIT: Ilko, please don't......
Old 04-30-2010, 02:12 PM
  #34  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,177
Received 1,935 Likes on 1,170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meek
Oh well, Anthony, we aren't going to agree; unless I change my mind at a later date, which is always possible Any Turbo engined car has major heat generating issues compared to an NA. Oh, and my mechanic agrees with yours, though when pushed, he really doesn't know for sure. My 964 has now done 108k, with the tray on, still has 5% across all six cylinders and no wobbly valves. Damn,now I have said that, you know what I will be f$x$ng next service!

EDIT: Ilko, please don't......
Do you track your 964? I do extensively 55k miles and the last 20k all track with 1-2% leak down and 170-175 compression. I never see a warm engine and i hope it stays this way for a while.

I do feel for average driving on the street it shouldn't make a difference either way. Heat is the killer so as long as your temps stay cool you should be fine.

Another concern is the cat. If it gets clogged over time or allowed to idle sitting still it builds tremendous heat on the left side. So much so that i have seen tire pressures increase on that one tire just from sitting idle staging for Auto cross events. The 100 cell cat did help to reduce these temps I believe that is why the number 3 cylinder is the most common for failing first.
Old 04-30-2010, 02:12 PM
  #35  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,172
Received 507 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by meek
EDIT: Ilko, please don't......
Too late, already did
Old 04-30-2010, 02:55 PM
  #36  
wolv
Instructor
 
wolv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brunei
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
I'd go even further and suggest you remove the transmission undertray as well. It helps air flow in the area even better.
K, gonna take Ilko's word for it.
Old 04-30-2010, 03:14 PM
  #37  
Marc Shaw
Super Duper Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Shaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YQU
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
I'd go even further and suggest you remove the transmission undertray as well. It helps air flow in the area even better.
...and the silvery "box" panels that surround the bottom of the engine too.

Marc
Old 04-30-2010, 03:30 PM
  #38  
Sire
Racer
 
Sire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Netherlands/ The Hague
Posts: 364
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Had the car dyno'd a year or two don't know exactly with 190.000 KM but had 293 BHP. Including the Vitesse Maf.
Old 04-30-2010, 03:48 PM
  #39  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,172
Received 507 Likes on 188 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marc Shaw
...and the silvery "box" panels that surround the bottom of the engine too.

Marc
Yes!

(unless you want to have heat in the cabin)

Old 05-03-2010, 05:45 PM
  #40  
sushisushi
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
sushisushi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: uk
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

were US cars lower powered than ROW ones?
Old 05-03-2010, 06:18 PM
  #41  
dfinnegan
Drifting
 
dfinnegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sushisushi
were US cars lower powered than ROW ones?
Old 05-03-2010, 06:37 PM
  #42  
boxsey911
Nordschleife Master
 
boxsey911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
I'd go even further and suggest you remove the transmission undertray as well. It helps air flow in the area even better.
Interesting point that I'm keen to hear more about. The reason being that the P-car specialists I use recommend that the engine undertray is best removed for track work (both for cooling and weight reduction) but the other undertrays (including the gearbox one) should be fitted to reduce turbulence.
Old 05-03-2010, 08:17 PM
  #43  
Henry964
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Henry964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 1,065
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I keep mine on the car, among other reasons because I live in an appartment and don´t have place to store it
Old 05-03-2010, 08:26 PM
  #44  
LA964RS
Drifting
 
LA964RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,300
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

@ 1.2 bar.....either side of 500 depending on the air....
Old 05-04-2010, 06:32 AM
  #45  
sergiDA
Instructor
 
sergiDA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Barcelona-Spain
Posts: 145
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

what is the weight of the undertray in Kilos?


Quick Reply: bhp of your 964



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:30 AM.