Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Acceptable leakdown and compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2009, 11:39 AM
  #1  
911porschefan
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911porschefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Acceptable leakdown and compression?

What would be acceptable leakdown and compression numbers? If there is a huge variation between cylinders is that a warning of something to come? How long should the car be running to get accurate numbers?
Old 08-22-2009, 01:44 PM
  #2  
Indycam
Nordschleife Master
 
Indycam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: not in HRM
Posts: 5,061
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911porschefan
What would be acceptable leakdown and compression numbers? If there is a huge variation between cylinders is that a warning of something to come? How long should the car be running to get accurate numbers?
The tests are done to see how the cylinders are .
If one or more cylinders are not up to snuff , you will maybe need to find whats going on with that cylinder/s .
If you have the test/s done and then post the numbers on rennlist ,
a few people will look at the numbers and tell you their thoughts .

As for what is and is not acceptable ,
the acceptable numbers for a race car , single engine airplane going out over the ocean etc ,
are not the same as the acceptable numbers for an old beater dump run truck .
I once drove a Mercedes-Benz W111 220s with zero compression in one cylinder .
Old 08-22-2009, 06:03 PM
  #3  
raspberryroadster
Three Wheelin'
 
raspberryroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: on the waterfront, Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 911porschefan
What would be acceptable leakdown and compression numbers? If there is a huge variation between cylinders is that a warning of something to come? How long should the car be running to get accurate numbers?
i am advised (& based my buy decsision on these numbers).....leakdown between 1 & 3, outside 4% is ok.

compression tests are done at low rpm & therefore less reflective of engine at stress - but are a reflection of overall health of the engine (if compression numbers are strong & consistent and if compression numbers are strong & very consistent....a leakdown test may not be warranted).

the car i purchased ppi'd (compression) at

#'s 2,3 & 6 175p.s.i
#'s 1,4 & 5 180 p.s.i
....which i am informed are v.g. to excel.

be better if more informed members chimed in on this one.

cheers
Old 08-22-2009, 08:25 PM
  #4  
augsburg911
Instructor
 
augsburg911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fwiw, when I had a leak down test performed on my car, I believe the numbers were roughly around 11%. The shop that conducted the test said that these numbers were good for a 16 year old car, with 78k miles on it.
Old 08-22-2009, 09:52 PM
  #5  
ilko
Agent Orange
Rennlist Member
 
ilko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 16,200
Received 562 Likes on 200 Posts
Default

Under 5% - awesome
Under 10% - good
Under 15% - acceptable
Over 20% - bad news for your bank account
Old 08-23-2009, 11:39 AM
  #6  
meek
Burning Brakes
 
meek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England
Posts: 898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^^ What Ilko said.
Old 08-23-2009, 12:36 PM
  #7  
steve g
Burning Brakes
 
steve g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yorkville IL
Posts: 1,210
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I understand the % values but what is the baseline number ?
The following users liked this post:
Paul Heuchert (08-16-2022)
Old 08-23-2009, 03:17 PM
  #8  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ilko
Under 5% - awesome
Under 10% - good
Under 15% - acceptable
Over 20% - bad news for your bank account
Thats excellent,...

For reference, a brand new engine thats been run sufficiently to seat the rings usually shows 2% (sometimes less, depending on what rings are used).
Old 08-23-2009, 04:27 PM
  #9  
Bearclaw
Three Wheelin'
 
Bearclaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Seattle xburb - I can't see the Emerald City, but I know it's out there somewhere
Posts: 1,926
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If the car hasn't been driven much recently or has been driven in a granny-like fashion, I suggest getting it up to full operating temp and giving it a good blast across the countryside before testing it. I rejected an '86 a few years ago when I was looking, in part because because one cylinder showed 8%, as opposed to the rest showing 2-4%. It was owned by a 70-yr-old guy who I know really babied it. From what I've read since, I wonder now if that wasn't because of a piece of carbon on a valve seat or some such thing. It wasn't investigated further because the car had some other things I didn't care for. But the price was really right and if those other things could have been worked out, I might have passed on a car that was really ok.
Old 08-23-2009, 07:34 PM
  #10  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Once you establish the leakdown numbers (Ilko's ranges are a good guide), you then need to determine where the leakage is happening....which can be done by listening. Is the sound caused by leakage at an intake valve, exhaust valve or rings? then you have more info to determine likely extent of the issue, if any.

the car should be up to normal operating temp when the leakdown test is taken. If you are under 12% leakage, yet close spread between all cylinders, I would be less concerned than if you had 4 or five at something like 5% and the others at a much higher number. Of course 5-6% on all is excellent for a used engine.
Old 08-23-2009, 07:54 PM
  #11  
raspberryroadster
Three Wheelin'
 
raspberryroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: on the waterfront, Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so what about ACTUAL compression test numbers....my porsche mechanic says that initial ppi should always start out with compression and that the cylinders should test out close together.
any views on the numbers that my ppi reflect for compression
ie all cylinders at between 175 & 180 p.s.i.
Old 08-23-2009, 08:26 PM
  #12  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by raspberryroadster
so what about ACTUAL compression test numbers....my porsche mechanic says that initial ppi should always start out with compression and that the cylinders should test out close together.
any views on the numbers that my ppi reflect for compression
ie all cylinders at between 175 & 180 p.s.i.
JMHO, but for me, leakdown figures are FAR more useful for determining engine condition, rather than compression test results as the latter is skewed by engine temperature and carbon deposits.

Further, leakdowns allow you to pinpoint WHERE any leakage is coming from; intake valves, exhaust valves or rings. When you find a leaky valve, staking the valve can improve the figure by loosening the carbon.

Compression tests tell you nothing about that whatsoever and in fact, can a be a red herring.
Old 08-23-2009, 08:43 PM
  #13  
911porschefan
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911porschefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 619
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

as usual thank you guys for the help. I guess the important thing for me to watch for will be the leakdown numbers. hopefully they will come back with relatively low percentages or at least consistent ones between all cylinders.

Last edited by 911porschefan; 08-24-2009 at 10:10 AM.
Old 08-23-2009, 09:01 PM
  #14  
raspberryroadster
Three Wheelin'
 
raspberryroadster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: on the waterfront, Kobe, Japan
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
JMHO, but for me, leakdown figures are FAR more useful for determining engine condition, rather than compression test results as the latter is skewed by engine temperature and carbon deposits.

Further, leakdowns allow you to pinpoint WHERE any leakage is coming from; intake valves, exhaust valves or rings. When you find a leaky valve, staking the valve can improve the figure by loosening the carbon.

Compression tests tell you nothing about that whatsoever and in fact, can a be a red herring.
thks steve, understand porsche maybe different than past cars (most recently cobra, 2 alfas & bmw)....you are a pro - i am not, but have always understood compression test was 1st sign of engine health, ie if an engine is basically a pump it needs strong compression to run efficiently, start easily and perform strongly....particularly any differences in compression between cylinders is a red (?) flag.

understand compression is run without stress....measure of health of bottom end - piston & rings....and guess what you are saying not indicative of health of top end-which is a deeper issue with a porsche

sorry, just trying to learn....1st porsche!!

thanks, gerry
Old 08-23-2009, 09:14 PM
  #15  
dfinnegan
Drifting
 
dfinnegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 3,363
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
When you find a leaky valve, staking the valve can improve the figure by loosening the carbon.
What is "staking the valve"?


Quick Reply: Acceptable leakdown and compression?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:12 PM.