Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

So, I'm seriously looking at 2 911's and would love to hear your opinion ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2007, 09:03 PM
  #1  
LUCKe27
Racer
Thread Starter
 
LUCKe27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Atlanta burbs
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool So, I'm seriously looking at 2 911's and would love to hear your opinion ...

I originally posted this on the 911 thread and was told to post it over here to look for alternative opinions on this subject --- so here it is. I'm looking at an '89 black cab with beige interior ($67k miles) and a '92 C2 red cab with off white/light grey interior ($51k miles). Both cars look great in pictures, and the price is similar. Part of me leans towards the newer car, but I do like the classic 911 look with the Fuchs. Thoughts from the forum?







Old 11-18-2007, 09:13 PM
  #2  
Rocket Rob
IHI KING!
Rennlist Member

 
Rocket Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nashua, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 13,384
Received 222 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

Both are great cars. Drive both of them and go with the one that you like the feel of the best.
Old 11-18-2007, 09:17 PM
  #3  
YYC930
Three Wheelin'
 
YYC930's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Buy the 964.......here's why.......

More HP and torque. Faster and smoother to drive.

It is a real car you can drive everyday year round......the heater works perfectly everytime, all the time.

It has dual airbags and ABS for safety.....and it is also newer.

Drive both back to back if you can......after that IMHO you won't look twice at the 1989.
Old 11-18-2007, 09:43 PM
  #4  
Greg964
Pro
 
Greg964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 524
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I second Rob's advice. Drive 'em both and see what version you prefer. THEN get a PPI on the car you like better, run a carfax and make sure everything is in order.

I personally like the 92, (but not a big fan of guards red). It has sport seats and is a good year for 964s, plus more modern suspension, more hp etc.
Old 11-19-2007, 08:58 AM
  #5  
gr1275
Pro
 
gr1275's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I was faced with the same decision a couple of years ago. I figured the '88 turbo was THE p-car. That was until I drove a 964turbo. The decision was easy... AC that works, ride and handling etc. Both cars are great... just different. We happen to like the way the 964 over the 88. We drove them both on the same day within an hour of each other. Take them out for an hour or so and the decisions will be much easier for you.
Old 11-19-2007, 01:41 PM
  #6  
tbennett017
Rennlist Member
 
tbennett017's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I am a 964 fan for sure.. but the black cabrio is sure a nice looking car.
Old 11-19-2007, 02:20 PM
  #7  
Wachuko
Professor of Pending Projects
Rennlist Member
 
Wachuko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 9,891
Received 21 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Wow.... both look very nice... I am a 964 fan... but that black '89 looks nice. I have to agree Rob... you have to drive them both and see which one appeals to your senses the most... can't go wrong with either one.
Old 11-19-2007, 04:02 PM
  #8  
911addict
Three Wheelin'
 
911addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm a 3.2 fan. Here's why:
even better built;
less complex, therefore easier n cheaper to fix;
rawer feel (depends if you think this is a benefit)
lighter so at least as fast as 964.
pure steering.
Fuchs wheels - classic & light.
Even more classic lines?
You'll spend more on mods on a 964 trying to make it perfect, where a 3.2 is near perfect to start ;-)

Of course some of these might be viewed as disadvantages.
964 more likely to have aircon (but more likely to can go wrong)

How's that for controversial?
Old 11-19-2007, 04:40 PM
  #9  
parsecnc4
Burning Brakes
 
parsecnc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: So. Cal (USA)
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Between the 2 choices, I would go for the '89.
Old 11-19-2007, 07:06 PM
  #10  
LUCKe27
Racer
Thread Starter
 
LUCKe27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Atlanta burbs
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the feedback. The guy selling the 964 is being a bit painful to deal with so far; so, we'll see how this progresses. If others want to chime in, please do.
Old 11-19-2007, 07:08 PM
  #11  
hawk911
Race Car
 
hawk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 4,951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

maybe the real question is creature comforts like ABS and airbags. If you want/need them as criteria for buying, then the '89 isn't really a choice, is it?
Old 11-20-2007, 10:19 AM
  #12  
Hoosier_Daddy
Rennlist Member
 
Hoosier_Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 973
Received 30 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

hmmm... oddly enough, both are probably (if even slightly) increasing in value, which is amazing given it's a car and not the million dollar collector variety.

.... the 3.6 liter is awfully nice .... I think that's what would push me toward the 964. (that and the fact it has coil-overs and much more easily improved for the track)

MHO...

HD
Old 11-20-2007, 10:28 AM
  #13  
1990-964
Pro
 
1990-964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Peninsula
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went down this road too,
The 3.2 cars drive like well, old cars. I found that old uncompromising feeling anything but better and consequently went with the 964 and have been very happy. Some may feel otherwise and that is fine but the 964 is a very solid car that outperforms a 3.2 car in every category. Better suspension, larger engine with more power and torque. If you like the older cars by all means go for it as they are great in their own right but for a more modern ride with all the traditional performance virtues the 964 is a great way to go.

Good Luck
Old 11-20-2007, 12:06 PM
  #14  
TR6
Drifting
 
TR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas/FortWorth Texas
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 911addict
I'm a 3.2 fan. Here's why:
...lighter so at least as fast as 964....
I don't think this is correct if you compare roadtests of each.
Old 11-20-2007, 05:42 PM
  #15  
User 040621
Drifting
 
User 040621's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,728
Received 96 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

drive them both. it's unlikely that you'll end up buying the first one(s) you see/drive. it's also likely that something will "click" as you drive these two models....one will fit/work for you, the other won't (as well). it's unlikely that these two P-cars are in identical condition - or have been maintained identically......but you'll be able to get a flavor of the different models. the cool thing is that this is the beginning of what can be a very interesting and rewarding journey........just be sure to get a thorough PPI (confirm availibility of the books, records, stamps) - and know what you're buying. regardless of which model you end up buying, every drive is a special experience. please keep us posted as you make progress.


Quick Reply: So, I'm seriously looking at 2 911's and would love to hear your opinion ...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:17 AM.