Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

3.8 vs 3.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2018, 09:24 AM
  #1  
Gus
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peachtree City, Ga
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 50 Posts
Default 3.8 vs 3.6

If you left all pretty much the same but only increased the engine size from 3.6 to 3.8 what would be the HP/torque gain. Given piston/cylinder change and machine work for heads. Just wondering what the HP to $$ ratio is and if the change is worth the move??
Old 11-20-2018, 10:32 AM
  #2  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,166
Received 1,928 Likes on 1,167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gus
If you left all pretty much the same but only increased the engine size from 3.6 to 3.8 what would be the HP/torque gain. Given piston/cylinder change and machine work for heads. Just wondering what the HP to $$ ratio is and if the change is worth the move??
Not much if that is all you do and slip fit IMO is a waste of money.
Old 11-20-2018, 10:40 AM
  #3  
Gus
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Gus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Peachtree City, Ga
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Know slip fit is not the route to take, definitely bore. Guessing that new pistons would probably increase compression ratio. Have already up graded to 993 valves, and had heads polished and machine for top gaskets.
But, just doing a rough calculation figure it would cost between $500 to $600 per extra HP.
Old 11-20-2018, 11:34 AM
  #4  
spartansix
Rennlist Member
 
spartansix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 1,301
Received 379 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

3.6 to 3.8 is only a 5.5% increase in displacement. Without any supporting mods, I wouldn't expect massive gains.
Old 11-20-2018, 12:07 PM
  #5  
jeff33702
Rennlist Member
 
jeff33702's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,739
Received 311 Likes on 226 Posts
Default

Is the argument against slip fit, that it will not be as strong? I've seen people say "slip fit because I'm just going to street drive it".
Old 11-20-2018, 12:08 PM
  #6  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Increase is actually 145cc or 4%. Far better getting some new cams and a whole lot cheaper.
Old 11-20-2018, 01:03 PM
  #7  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Close ratio gears makes a FAR FAR bigger difference than the 3.8 conversion. Its truly night & day.
Old 11-20-2018, 02:07 PM
  #8  
Railmaster.
Three Wheelin'
 
Railmaster.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,480
Received 107 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Close ratio gears makes a FAR FAR bigger difference than the 3.8 conversion. Its truly night & day.
How much differens if You fit a G50/21 instead of a G50/20? Is it worth it? Or are a dedicated re gear the way to go?

Edit: The above boxes are 993 six speed ones but maybe Mr Weiner can answer the question regardless of that? 😀

Last edited by Railmaster.; 11-20-2018 at 02:09 PM. Reason: Wrong forum!
Old 11-20-2018, 03:18 PM
  #9  
-nick
Three Wheelin'
 
-nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge/Boston, MA
Posts: 1,781
Received 104 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Why consider the 102mm p&c (3746cc) when 104mm (3894cc) and 106mm (4045cc) are available? Though nobody seems to actually be using any of these bores.
Old 11-20-2018, 03:49 PM
  #10  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Going from stock 3.6 100 to Mahle 3.8 103 w/ a little more compression is worth about 25 lb-ft the flywheel @~5200rpm, a little less at other rpms but nevertheless something that is palpable there at all rpm.

closerer gearing keeps the engine in it's best power range for more of the time but doesn't really change the acceleration positively unless it is also lower(higher numerically)

here is an illustration of the thrust available in a stock 964 w/ 3 different transmissions, g50/03, g50/05 these are stock 964 transmissions and a g50/30 used in 993 Cuop & RSR, Only where the /30 is lower does it improve acceleration, but the extra gear does close the gaps


What would 25 lb-ft extra flywheel torque do to the above curves, well just multiply the overall gear ratio by 25 and add it to the existing curve, of course that is only applicable at 5250rpm, you get less at other rpms
Old 11-20-2018, 04:00 PM
  #11  
K964
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
K964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Other PA
Posts: 3,027
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Close ratio gears makes a FAR FAR bigger difference than the 3.8 conversion. Its truly night & day.
Ding. Ding. Ding. And we have a winner. By far the best mod I have EVER done in any car. Ever.....
Old 11-20-2018, 04:07 PM
  #12  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K964


Ding. Ding. Ding. And we have a winner. By far the best mod I have EVER done in any car. Ever.....
Mike's is a close approximation or clone of a g50/30

Here are some rear wheel torque curves for the various 3.6 & 3.8 engines, the 964 ssi is there only to show what a poor choice of exhaust can do
Old 11-21-2018, 09:08 AM
  #13  
cobalt
Rennlist Member
 
cobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 22,166
Received 1,928 Likes on 1,167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K964


Ding. Ding. Ding. And we have a winner. By far the best mod I have EVER done in any car. Ever.....
I have a similar short gear box and it is worth the $$ but not cheap.
Old 11-21-2018, 10:15 AM
  #14  
Spyerx
Rennlist Member
 
Spyerx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 16,482
Received 1,729 Likes on 1,057 Posts
Default

Every builder ive talked to said just doing 3.8 is not worth the cost as described here. Other things need to be done to make it worth it.


Originally Posted by K964
Ding. Ding. Ding. And we have a winner. By far the best mod I have EVER done in any car. Ever.....
Is your motor a 3.6 and stockish? What ratios did you go with?

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Close ratio gears makes a FAR FAR bigger difference than the 3.8 conversion. Its truly night & day.
Do you have a suggested ratio set for a 5spd strong 3.6?

Im way over analyzing the gear set ratios. Right now I’m considering a slight deviation to the rs set and going with a set Matt has been selling for these that changes 1-4
Old 11-21-2018, 03:20 PM
  #15  
nowata
Rennlist Member
 
nowata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 906
Received 75 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Close ratio gears makes a FAR FAR bigger difference than the 3.8 conversion. Its truly night & day.
Steve can you provide a chart or graph that compares this? Like speed vs rpm for each gear? And is an LSD install the right time to do it?


Quick Reply: 3.8 vs 3.6



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:01 AM.