Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

8.5” rear wheel offset question to keep it flush with fenders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2018, 04:29 PM
  #1  
Myles Maycher
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Myles Maycher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default 8.5” rear wheel offset question to keep it flush with fenders

i am currently running cup 1rims with 225 in front and 255 in the rear. I am considering getting some custom wheels made for me. I would like the rims to be as flush with the fenders as possible without having any rubbing issues. Also I want them to weigh way less than the aluminum cup 1s. My fenders are rolled from a previous owner. For the fronts I was going to go 17x8 52et. That seems like a fairly safe size from the reading I have done on the forums.

Here is is my actual question. For the rears I was thinking of having a 17x8.5 wheel. The 8.5 inch wheel should be a bit lighter than a 9 or 9.5 inch and the 255 tire still fits. My issue is like I said I want to go flush with the fender without rubbing and I cannot find much info on 8.5inch rear wheels and offsets used. The RS Cup car is a 9” with a 55et. If you want to leave the outside lip in the same position on an 8.5 inch wheel it would be approx equivilant to an 8.5 49et. I’m pretty sure those are not flush with the fender. I saw that people are running 9.5 et68 with 21mm spacers which is equal to 9.5 et47. If I use an approx equivilant to keep the same position of the outter lip that would be an 8.5 et35. Can anyone confirm if I am correct and if that would work. My other concern is maybe the wheel won’t fit over the calipers. Maybe that’s why the high offset wheel with the 21mm spacer is used on the 9.5 wide wheel. Is there anything else that I should be concerned about?
Old 09-23-2018, 09:01 PM
  #2  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Myles Maycher
i am currently running cup 1rims with 225 in front and 255 in the rear. I am considering getting some custom wheels made for me. I would like the rims to be as flush with the fenders as possible without having any rubbing issues. Also I want them to weigh way less than the aluminum cup 1s. My fenders are rolled from a previous owner. For the fronts I was going to go 17x8 52et. That seems like a fairly safe size from the reading I have done on the forums.

Here is is my actual question. For the rears I was thinking of having a 17x8.5 wheel. The 8.5 inch wheel should be a bit lighter than a 9 or 9.5 inch and the 255 tire still fits. My issue is like I said I want to go flush with the fender without rubbing and I cannot find much info on 8.5inch rear wheels and offsets used. The RS Cup car is a 9” with a 55et. If you want to leave the outside lip in the same position on an 8.5 inch wheel it would be approx equivilant to an 8.5 49et. I’m pretty sure those are not flush with the fender. I saw that people are running 9.5 et68 with 21mm spacers which is equal to 9.5 et47. If I use an approx equivilant to keep the same position of the outter lip that would be an 8.5 et35. Can anyone confirm if I am correct and if that would work. My other concern is maybe the wheel won’t fit over the calipers. Maybe that’s why the high offset wheel with the 21mm spacer is used on the 9.5 wide wheel. Is there anything else that I should be concerned about?
You are correct that an 8.5 ET35 will have about the same front space as a 9.5 ET47, the 8.5 outer lip will actually be .7mm more inboard if the flanges are the same

The big issue that you are missing is that the narrower wheel will not support the tire anywhere near as well as the wider 9 or 9.5. The difference in weight is negligible so that is a false economy, The loss of performance potential is not minor.
Old 09-23-2018, 10:04 PM
  #3  
Myles Maycher
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Myles Maycher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ok thank you. I thought that the tire should be the maximum size for the rim to get max performance. I thought as the tire was stretched the performance went down. I guess I had it backwards. What is the best width with a 255. A 9” or 9.5”?
Old 09-24-2018, 09:42 AM
  #4  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Myles Maycher
Ok thank you. I thought that the tire should be the maximum size for the rim to get max performance. I thought as the tire was stretched the performance went down. I guess I had it backwards. What is the best width with a 255. A 9” or 9.5”?
255/40 x17 is spec'd for an 8.5 to 10, best performance is from a 10

964 can use 9.5ET47+/ or 10 ET~51+/- w/ 255/40
Old 09-24-2018, 03:59 PM
  #5  
Myles Maycher
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Myles Maycher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Why is the tire better on a wider rim? Is it because there is less flex in the sidewall? I assume the contact patch of the tire always remains the same regardless of the size of the rim. Or does that change marginally as well depending on rim width when the tire is stretched?
Old 09-24-2018, 07:26 PM
  #6  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Myles Maycher
Why is the tire better on a wider rim? Is it because there is less flex in the sidewall? I assume the contact patch of the tire always remains the same regardless of the size of the rim. Or does that change marginally as well depending on rim width when the tire is stretched?
Yes, the wider the wheel the more the tire side wall is spread the less flex. To a point, you don't want to go much beyond the spec.

The tread width is pretty much the same no matter the wheel width

On a narrow wheel the side wall is more vertical giving a slightly taller OD, The side wall will also be more flexible, in a curve the tire distorts w/ the tread moving out of alignment w/ the wheel, like this, from this (__) to this /__/


when mounted though the tread remains constant the section width varies by ~.2" per extra .5" of wheel width

for example a 255/40 x17 on an 8.5 will have a section width of ~10" on a 10 it will be more like 10.6" the OD will also be shorter by a small amount
Old 09-25-2018, 03:11 AM
  #7  
Myles Maycher
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Myles Maycher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Perfect thank you for the info. Last question. When you say a 255 can use a 10” et~51 +/- . Is 51 the ideal offset in that width? The +/- is that beacause different manufacturer tires fit slightly different so you may be able to have slightly higher or lower offset on a 10” rim.?
Old 09-25-2018, 03:54 AM
  #8  
boostedt0y
Banned
 
boostedt0y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 534
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Default



Here is my rear BBS E26 wheel 17x10 +47 with a 5mm spacer making the effective offset +42. Tires are 255/40/17 re71r. -2 deg of rear camber. Rear fender lips are ground down for extra clearance.

Old 09-25-2018, 12:15 PM
  #9  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Myles Maycher
Perfect thank you for the info. Last question. When you say a 255 can use a 10” et~51 +/- . Is 51 the ideal offset in that width? The +/- is that beacause different manufacturer tires fit slightly different so you may be able to have slightly higher or lower offset on a 10” rim.?
There are some relatively minor differences in physical size among the various tire manufacturers, more significant is the shoulder profile differences. So yes different tires fit slightly differently.

As to the ideal ET, as you get to more extreme fitments there is less and less leeway, most folks that fit 10s also use 275/xx tires, 255/40 being narrower provide a little more leeway.

some background as ET goes from 42 to 50 the whole wheel/tire assembly moves inboard.
Too far out means lip interference, too far in means oil line interference.
Shorter tires are easier to fit than taller tires.

I've seen 10" fitments from
ET44 w/ 265/35 or 275/35 x18 to ET51 w/ 275/35 x18

I've seen lip interference w/ ET 43 & 275/35 x18

from this I'd say that w/ a 255/40 x17 10ET45 to 50 would be safe 45 is closer to the lip and 50 is closer to the oil line. So ET47 +/-

Old 09-25-2018, 03:17 PM
  #10  
911 jared
Rennlist Member
 
911 jared's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Southern Ca
Posts: 780
Received 207 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boostedt0y


Here is my rear BBS E26 wheel 17x10 +47 with a 5mm spacer making the effective offset +42. Tires are 255/40/17 re71r. -2 deg of rear camber. Rear fender lips are ground down for extra clearance.

PERFECTION!
Old 10-23-2018, 12:49 PM
  #11  
Myles Maycher
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Myles Maycher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I am wondering if a 17x8.5 with a 55et and 225/45:17 would fit up front without rubbing?
Old 10-23-2018, 02:37 PM
  #12  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,241
Received 502 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Myles Maycher
I am wondering if a 17x8.5 with a 55et and 225/45:17 would fit up front without rubbing?
Maybe
I've seen on 964 8.5 front
ET48 235/
ET40 245/35/
ET50 ?
ET45 235/
Old 10-23-2018, 04:09 PM
  #13  
SRM11
Advanced
 
SRM11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 99
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

See my thread:

https://rennlist.com/forums/964-foru...-are-here.html

8.5" front and 10" rear, both with +45... pretty perfect, zero rub (but on very stiff suspension. I plan to camber it and lower a touch more
Old 10-23-2018, 04:16 PM
  #14  
Myles Maycher
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
Myles Maycher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SRM11
See my thread:

https://rennlist.com/forums/964-foru...-are-here.html

8.5" front and 10" rear, both with +45... pretty perfect, zero rub (but on very stiff suspension. I plan to camber it and lower a touch more

what are are you running for caster?

I am not really concerned about it rubbing the upper fenders. I’m more concerned it will rub the inner fender liner. I have the corner of the bumper/fender liner trimmed to allow max clearance. But I don’t want to have to back the caster off below rs spec to accommodate a wheel.
Old 10-23-2018, 04:53 PM
  #15  
SRM11
Advanced
 
SRM11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 99
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

No camber right now as far as I know. They are pretty square. There's still room on the inside and the tires I run fit wider than most. Shown with a 225 front and a 265 rear



Quick Reply: 8.5” rear wheel offset question to keep it flush with fenders



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:11 AM.