Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

87 951 VEMS Install

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2019, 01:27 AM
  #361  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

New Siemens Deka 80# high z injectors came in from www.fuelinjectionconnection.com swapped them in. No dice still same issue. Readjusted gap again on speed sensor. Same. Does anyone know how close I can get on the reference sensor before the speed sensor touches the starter ring gear? I read that there is a high spot on the ring gear which the speed sensor reads off of. I'm beginning to think I'm just chasing my tail. I'm wonder if the whole issue is the notched bell housing. Regardless of the updated sleeve. Who here has the notched bell housing? I'm hoping that an aftermarket flywheel is not the only solution. Since someone is having issues with the clewet front mount crank sensor.

Peep,
Is it possible to use a cam sensor for a trigger? Also, does vems use both speed and reference sensors?
​​
Old 02-09-2019, 02:18 PM
  #362  
markl951
Rennlist Member
 
markl951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 188
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Just curious if you're using the spacer (item 32) on the speed sensor? That spacer has the effect of pushing the reference sensor closer to the stud on the flywheel.
I updated to this bracket recently on my 85 NA racecar after notching the bell housing and did not put the spacer in. My car starts now w/o all the kickback drama but I might add the spacer and check for clearance to reference sensor just because I'd like to know.

Old 02-09-2019, 05:28 PM
  #363  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markl951
Just curious if you're using the spacer (item 32) on the speed sensor? That spacer has the effect of pushing the reference sensor closer to the stud on the flywheel.
I updated to this bracket recently on my 85 NA racecar after notching the bell housing and did not put the spacer in. My car starts now w/o all the kickback drama but I might add the spacer and check for clearance to reference sensor just because I'd like to know.

​​​​​​I have the spacer. And per your experience, I removed it and regapped the sensors again. Just to be sure the reference sensor didn't hit, I found the pin and made sure it didn't hit, while I hand cranked the motor over back and forth. I also swapped my new facet sensors to my older fae sensors, same issue. Gonna probably buy bosch sensors next. I also rerouted the battery cables to starter and made them farther from sensors. The only other thing I can think of causing interference with sensors is the cable from battery to alternator. But there isn't another way to route it. There are a few here with the Nissan alternator mod and no issues. Maybe it's my ice shark cable kit? Looks like the shielding use is not for emi or rf but for heat shielding. I want to exhaust all options before going to a crank trigger route. Appreciate your input.
Old 02-09-2019, 11:16 PM
  #364  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Also, can someone with a turbo config share theirs, I want to compare a few things. Thanks

Posted my config if someone wants to check it out.
Attached Files

Last edited by shortyboy; 02-10-2019 at 12:06 AM.
Old 02-10-2019, 06:31 AM
  #365  
H.F.B.
Pro
 
H.F.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 550
Received 99 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shortyboy
Also, can someone with a turbo config share theirs, I want to compare a few things. Thanks

Posted my config if someone wants to check it out.
@EGO Closed Loop Control Settings
Why is your Lean limit and Rich limit = 0 % ?

F1 (Help)
Lean Limit
Allows this percent of enleanment.
Rich Limit
Allows this percent of enrichment.

I assume 0 % could disable enleanment/enrichment .

Did you already try 5% and step size 1
Old 02-10-2019, 08:14 AM
  #366  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H.F.B.
@EGO Closed Loop Control Settings
Why is your Lean limit and Rich limit = 0 % ?

F1 (Help)
Lean Limit
Allows this percent of enleanment.
Rich Limit
Allows this percent of enrichment.

I assume 0 % could disable enleanment/enrichment .

Did you already try 5% and step size 1
I was told by Peep, when using auto tune / ve analyzer to set those settings to 0%.
Old 02-10-2019, 02:52 PM
  #367  
H.F.B.
Pro
 
H.F.B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 550
Received 99 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shortyboy
I was told by Peep, when using auto tune / ve analyzer to set those settings to 0%.
ok, interesting auto tuned VE Table in your config. No values above 55. Seems weird to me.


NCLA951's table is pretty different, second post in this tread:
https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turb...l#post14090010
Old 02-10-2019, 03:41 PM
  #368  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H.F.B.
ok, interesting auto tuned VE Table in your config. No values above 55. Seems weird to me.


NCLA951's table is pretty different, second post in this tread:
https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turb...l#post14090010
Req_fuel fuel is set at 9.5. Have not made alot of few WOT runs, cause of bad weather here. So I manually input alot of tables based on 2 full wot pulls.
Old 02-12-2019, 05:09 AM
  #369  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Btw, does everyone's tach bounce when starting the car like with the stock dme / Klr? Mine doesn't, just wondering.
Old 02-12-2019, 11:54 PM
  #370  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,664
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shortyboy
Req_fuel fuel is set at 9.5. Have not made alot of few WOT runs, cause of bad weather here. So I manually input alot of tables based on 2 full wot pulls.
Um, how did you arrive at a Req_fuel value of 9.5? I have the same Siemens-Deka 830CC injectors that you do, and my Req_fuel is set at 5.0. I think this explains why your VE table has such strangely low values. Here's a copy-and-paste from the VEMS webpage:

Basic req_fuel calculation:
req_fuel = 6.49 * (D / N / I)
D engine displacement (cc)
N number of injectors (eg. 4 for a 4 cyl port injection)
I injector flowrate (cc/min)
This is a simplified equation, if you are interested in the reasoning behind it you can read more here: http://www.vems.hu/wiki/index.php?pa...njectorOpening

I am not convinced that this is causing your weird starting issue, but it should at least help with tuning.
Old 02-13-2019, 01:42 AM
  #371  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Droops83
Um, how did you arrive at a Req_fuel value of 9.5? I have the same Siemens-Deka 830CC injectors that you do, and my Req_fuel is set at 5.0. I think this explains why your VE table has such strangely low values. Here's a copy-and-paste from the VEMS webpage:

Basic req_fuel calculation:
req_fuel = 6.49 * (D / N / I)
D engine displacement (cc)
N number of injectors (eg. 4 for a 4 cyl port injection)
I injector flowrate (cc/min)
This is a simplified equation, if you are interested in the reasoning behind it you can read more here: http://www.vems.hu/wiki/index.php?pa...njectorOpening

I am not convinced that this is causing your weird starting issue, but it should at least help with tuning.
I initially did that method, using formula, but was later instructed by Peep to adjust Req_fuel until I have spot on lamba at idle. My req fuel is high, be table values are low, I see that everyones req fuel is low, and table values are high. Main point that lamba values are achieved, I think it's ok. I might have a lead on solving this issue. After adjusting and swapping out brackets and sensors, I began to look at pin height of the reference sensor. I noticed it to be too far in. Going to try and get the reference gap as close as possible. So I removed the Allen screw, bought a new one and reset the height with red threadlocker. I might go and find a longer screw for good measure, stock is m6x12, maybe go m6x16. Tried a cap head bolt but it hits the bell housing. I believe the critical sensor is the reference compared to the speed sensor. As it determines TDC.
Old 02-13-2019, 02:21 AM
  #372  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,664
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shortyboy
I initially did that method, using formula, but was later instructed by Peep to adjust Req_fuel until I have spot on lamba at idle. My req fuel is high, be table values are low, I see that everyones req fuel is low, and table values are high. Main point that lamba values are achieved, I think it's ok. I might have a lead on solving this issue. After adjusting and swapping out brackets and sensors, I began to look at pin height of the reference sensor. I noticed it to be too far in. Going to try and get the reference gap as close as possible. So I removed the Allen screw, bought a new one and reset the height with red threadlocker. I might go and find a longer screw for good measure, stock is m6x12, maybe go m6x16. Tried a cap head bolt but it hits the bell housing. I believe the critical sensor is the reference compared to the speed sensor. As it determines TDC.
Hey, you might be onto something here (though I think that several of us have asked if speed AND reference mark sensor gaps were good). The reference mark signal is really only used during cranking to determine when TDC #1 is approaching (at least on the original Motronic system) to enable engine startup. After that, the DME is capable of calculating engine position by counting engine revolutions via the engine speed sensor, thus rendering the reference mark signal redundant while the engine is running. This would explain why your engine runs well and continues to do so if it starts well, or runs crappy and continues to do so until the next "good" start.

Let's hope that is it before you replace any more parts!

Last edited by Droops83; 02-13-2019 at 02:50 AM.
Old 02-13-2019, 10:37 PM
  #373  
shortyboy
Rennlist Member
 
shortyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Honolulu,HI
Posts: 2,528
Received 33 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Droops83
Hey, you might be onto something here (though I think that several of us have asked if speed AND reference mark sensor gaps were good). The reference mark signal is really only used during cranking to determine when TDC #1 is approaching (at least on the original Motronic system) to enable engine startup. After that, the DME is capable of calculating engine position by counting engine revolutions via the engine speed sensor, thus rendering the reference mark signal redundant while the engine is running. This would explain why your engine runs well and continues to do so if it starts well, or runs crappy and continues to do so until the next "good" start.

Let's hope that is it before you replace any more parts!

Nope, just put her back together and same issue. Speed and reference sensor gaps are very close now, both at 0.8mm or closer. As much as I want to send in my ecu for evaluation, I've had this problem since installing it new. Got a new set of bosch sensors coming in. Swap out Nissan Quest alternator? For a new or stock?Replace my Ice Shark Battery / Alternator / Starter cables? Idk, thoughs?

Last edited by shortyboy; 02-13-2019 at 10:53 PM.
Old 02-13-2019, 10:56 PM
  #374  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,664
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shortyboy
Nope, just put her back together and same issue. Speed and reference sensor gaps are very close now, both at 0.8mm or closer. As much as I want to send in my ecu for evaluation, I've had this problem since installing it new. Got a new set of bosch sensors coming in. Swap out Nissan Quest alternator? For a new or stock?Replace my Ice Shark Battery / Alternator / Starter cables? Idk, thoughs?
Have you ever used a timing light to check the timing values at various RPMs and compared values after "good" and "bad" starts, and compared it to what the VEMS thinks it is? If the values are different between the two modes at the same RPM, that would confirm some sort of trigger issue, though it seems like you've tried everything related to that . . . . .
Old 02-14-2019, 03:16 AM
  #375  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

If there is some trigger issue (missing trigger events, noise etc) then it should throw trigger error flag with information which type of trigger error there was. And would be useful to record triggerlog (Tools -> Record triggerlog) for both good and bad starts, that would help to eliminate trigger issues and wasting time if there is no problems.
Also regarding req_fuel, it doesn't matter what it is as it is just a multiplier for VE table and you cannot compare VE table values directly anyway unless engines are identical. You can compare VE table shape but that is also affected by injector dead times etc.


Quick Reply: 87 951 VEMS Install



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:50 PM.