Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive
View Poll Results: 5 Speed or 6 Speed with a 3.0L Turbo?
5 Speed
7
38.89%
6 Speed
11
61.11%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Turbo Owners: Question 5sp or 6sp?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2014, 09:55 PM
  #16  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I really don't think the ratios of the 6 speed are an issue. All this talk about too much shifting shouldn't really be a concern in my experience. Same with the 5 speed/S2 r&p combo. We're certainly not shifting like some short ratio n/a rally car when we're on the track. (See Youtube links below for incar footage)
Old 12-02-2014, 10:12 PM
  #17  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,704
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 968TurboS
968 turbo S transmission. Has the best of both.
yes. for any 3.0 Turbo engine, that T-box's ratios and rear diff is perfect.

the next best thing would is a 968 box with the taller 01E euro diesel 3-4-5-6 gears that are available, and will fit.

but those sweet gears are ~$3 k.
Old 12-03-2014, 12:38 AM
  #18  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
I'm of the mindset that the gearing is too short on the 968 trans. Howevee, first is too short on the 951 box too.

In stock form, I'd stay with the 951 box. I just wish it was as strong as the 6 spd.
Sid,

You have some of the cleanest posts. I love my six speed, but I'm weird, but maybe having a 968TS box makes it even.

G
Old 12-03-2014, 09:19 PM
  #19  
seattle951
Pro
 
seattle951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 569
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Out of curiosity, what would it cost to change the gear ratios in a 968 LSD?
Old 12-04-2014, 06:36 AM
  #20  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

I can supply gear sets to modify the ratios in the 968 gearbox. PM or e-mail me if interested.

ETA : sorry, just sold my last spare set today shortly after I posted. Will post again when I have another set available.

Last edited by Thom; 12-04-2014 at 12:11 PM.
Old 12-04-2014, 05:53 PM
  #21  
seattle951
Pro
 
seattle951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 569
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
I can supply gear sets to modify the ratios in the 968 gearbox. PM or e-mail me if interested.

ETA : sorry, just sold my last spare set today shortly after I posted. Will post again when I have another set available.
Please post again if you get another set in. I am not in the market now. I am in the process of an overseas move.

I do not have the technical skills to the work myself. If I have the work done in a shop, what is a reasonable price point for parts and labor?

I like the idea of a 6-speed, but the ratios are completely wrong for my motor.
Old 12-04-2014, 07:58 PM
  #22  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Ultimate to me would be an S2 box with a separate 1:1.2 stepup (overdrive) epicyclic gear unit built into the trans bellhousing.

This would take the place of the TT coupler, would be very short and compact, and increase the speed of the whole trans therefore increasing engine horsepower/torque capability of the trans in proportion to the stepup ratio.

The unit would be mounted on a 6mm thick plate that sandwiches between the trans and the TT bellhousing, thus adding minimal length. Self-contained oiling system, or port to the trans.

Conceptual design looks feasible, don't expect it to progress tho...

Cheers,
Mike
Old 12-04-2014, 08:28 PM
  #23  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

You gotta get out more often Mikey!

Actually ultimate would be a good SQ with paddle shift. I know of 2 of these being installed at the moment.
Old 12-05-2014, 04:58 PM
  #24  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thingo
Myself I think the 968 shifts better, not much difference in the top speed compared to a stock 951. Changing the clutch is much easier with the 968 tt more pressure plate choice, but less so for the clutch disk. Better lsd in the 968.
I agree. The 2 hour clutch job makes this the best choice for that reason alone. I can't go WOT in first, but 2nd on does hook up once GOOD performance tires are used, well sorted suspension, etc. The 968 boxes are stronger and the CMS Side Covers add much more strength. With a good LSD, short shifter, etc. I prefer the 968. They also make side plates for the 5 speed box, which is very popular in the kit car markets. There is more work towards conversion, but you'll see a payback on the first clutch change. You'll also have the ability to use a standalone using the factory trigger wheel, huge to me, and I'm a proponent of using as much factory parts as possible.

Finally, you can use a 911 TT Sport clutch in the 968 trans. Butter smooth, and will hold more tq than any aftermarket clutch I've used on my 5 speed cars. This was always a sore contention towards chatter, smooth shifting, tq holding ability etc.

Everyone that's driven my car with this setup was immediately impressed with the peddle pressure, and overall drive ability.

Hope this helps.

George
Old 12-05-2014, 05:27 PM
  #25  
nick_968
Burning Brakes
 
nick_968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by George D
I agree. The 2 hour clutch job makes this the best choice for that reason alone. I can't go WOT in first, but 2nd on does hook up once GOOD performance tires are used, well sorted suspension, etc. The 968 boxes are stronger and the CMS Side Covers add much more strength. With a good LSD, short shifter, etc. I prefer the 968. They also make side plates for the 5 speed box, which is very popular in the kit car markets. There is more work towards conversion, but you'll see a payback on the first clutch change. You'll also have the ability to use a standalone using the factory trigger wheel, huge to me, and I'm a proponent of using as much factory parts as possible.

Finally, you can use a 911 TT Sport clutch in the 968 trans. Butter smooth, and will hold more tq than any aftermarket clutch I've used on my 5 speed cars. This was always a sore contention towards chatter, smooth shifting, tq holding ability etc.

Everyone that's driven my car with this setup was immediately impressed with the peddle pressure, and overall drive ability.

Hope this helps.

George
I like the short ratios of the 968 box for my 3.0 turbo but then I already had it as my car is a 968. Thoms setup is probably a good option - more so if you can drive it on the autobahn as he can!

George - did you do anything to reinforce the firewall to deal with the extra force from the stiffer clutch plate? When I spoke to Powerhaus about this a few years back he said they had experienced issues with the firewall with that clutch. I currently use the 993 C2 pressure plate with the 968 friction disc. Is yours all 911 TT or just the pressure plate?
Old 12-05-2014, 05:41 PM
  #26  
964-C2
Racer
 
964-C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 288
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Thom
I can supply gear sets to modify the ratios in the 968 gearbox. PM or e-mail me if interested.
ETA : sorry, just sold my last spare set today shortly after I posted. Will post again when I have another set available.
What will the gear ratios be with this set up versus the turbo/S2/968 boxes?
Old 12-06-2014, 02:47 PM
  #27  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by George D
I agree. The 2 hour clutch job makes this the best choice for that reason alone.
I am curious how much of a clutch-unfriendly ham-fisted driver it would take to justify going through the hassle of replacing the whole flywheel+cltuch+bellhousing+torque tube to justify saving a few hours of work when the clutch is a unit that should normally last for several tens of thousands miles.

Originally Posted by George D
The 968 boxes are stronger and the CMS Side Covers add much more strength.
That's not the feeling I have had so far using both trans on my car, the 5 speed never opened since it left the factory and the 6 speed having been built by a specialist usually rebuilding trans for Cup cars.

Originally Posted by George D
You'll also have the ability to use a standalone using the factory trigger wheel, huge to me, and I'm a proponent of using as much factory parts as possible.
A proper tuner will be able to make the 951 trigger wheel work with a capable aftermarket EFI.
Old 12-06-2014, 09:04 PM
  #28  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I'm wondering what sort of ECU that tuner is using to get the 951 stock trigger to work, it can be very problematic.
Old 12-07-2014, 08:59 PM
  #29  
Weston Dillard
Racer
 
Weston Dillard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 354
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

2400# 425TQ 3.0L Track only

I thought the 6 speed would be too much shifting, but I think it works great with standard ratios. I do not run out of gear at TWS (either direction) or COTA.

All I changed to run 968 box was trans and left side drive axle. I spaced the trans mount down about 1/4 inch to keep shift mechanism from rubbing heat shield on tank. Been run hard for 3 years, all good.

West
Old 12-07-2014, 11:04 PM
  #30  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thingo
I'm wondering what sort of ECU that tuner is using to get the 951 stock trigger to work, it can be very problematic.
That would be the Link/Vipec platform although not everyone has got that to work perfectly. I think it's almost a matter of luck at times. Some people's seem to work, others don't.

Originally Posted by Weston Dillard
2400# 425TQ 3.0L Track only

I thought the 6 speed would be too much shifting, but I think it works great with standard ratios. I do not run out of gear at TWS (either direction) or COTA.

All I changed to run 968 box was trans and left side drive axle. I spaced the trans mount down about 1/4 inch to keep shift mechanism from rubbing heat shield on tank. Been run hard for 3 years, all good.

West
2400lbs...is that with all fluids West? Lexan front screen? Sounds really light.


Quick Reply: Turbo Owners: Question 5sp or 6sp?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:00 AM.