Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

TonyG > New Race Car Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2016, 06:04 PM
  #1306  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
My point being that if you're only doing a very few shifts with the 5 speed then you're not losing too much time in gearchanges alone. Hopefully with the new 6 speed and ultra quick shifts you'll be able to take more advantage of the powerplant. Either way, I'm jealous!
Here's some interesting math (this isn't clear cut and there are some approximations made here....)

At WSIR, using 3/4/5 gears, there are 6 gear changes. Each one costing 3/4 car length (against a no-lift 997 Cup Car). That's typically what I see when I race against them.

10.5' per shift (the car is 14' long), x 6 shifts per lap, = 63' per lap lost

63'x12 laps=756' lost per race or approx 1/8th mile back, apples-to-apples, at the end of a 12 lap race.


Even if you say 1/2 a car length per shift

7'x6 shifts per lap = 42' per lap lost
42'x12 laps = 504' lost at the end of the race to the guy with the sequential box.

Go to a track with more shifting and the difference gets worse.

That alone is why you have to go to a sequential box it if you race against people that have them.

Sucks really... they should ban them in the interest of lowering the cost of the sport... but that's never gonna happen with they come stock in factory race cars.

TonyG
Old 02-10-2016, 08:05 PM
  #1307  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome Tony. Neat build. Congratulations!

G

Originally Posted by TonyG
*** Update - Car Dynoed... results in ***

Here's the dyno from today.

Note that the car is using a bone stock LS7 intake.

We're going to have a custom Wilson sheet metal intake fabricated which should be good for another 40RWHP-50RWHP. The stock LS7 intake ports just don't enough cfm to support the heads/cam.

No matter... it's making great power.

TonyG

Old 02-10-2016, 09:03 PM
  #1308  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
Here's some interesting math (this isn't clear cut and there are some approximations made here....)

At WSIR, using 3/4/5 gears, there are 6 gear changes. Each one costing 3/4 car length (against a no-lift 997 Cup Car). That's typically what I see when I race against them.

10.5' per shift (the car is 14' long), x 6 shifts per lap, = 63' per lap lost

63'x12 laps=756' lost per race or approx 1/8th mile back, apples-to-apples, at the end of a 12 lap race.


Even if you say 1/2 a car length per shift

7'x6 shifts per lap = 42' per lap lost
42'x12 laps = 504' lost at the end of the race to the guy with the sequential box.

Go to a track with more shifting and the difference gets worse.

That alone is why you have to go to a sequential box it if you race against people that have them.

Sucks really... they should ban them in the interest of lowering the cost of the sport... but that's never gonna happen with they come stock in factory race cars.

TonyG
Oh sure. Without doubt! These things are awesome. Even more with the paddle shift. Even, even more with a turbo car as you don't lose boost/spool like an H pattern. I am allowed to run an SQ box but no paddles. Problem is that this conversion is out of my budget. So we're stuck with the H pattern 6 speed which is so clunky by comparison. Hence, the less gearchanges the better for us. Hence offset grind 16v build to increase tq. All about compromises unfortunately. I understand you're working on an interesting side project too. Are you chasing anything apart from a weight loss with that?
Old 02-11-2016, 04:26 AM
  #1309  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
The Geartronics system that controls the Albins trans has it's own computer. It doesn't tie into the GM computer. No drive by wire either. Geartronics system has it's own blipper and shift actuator.

http://www.geartronics.co.uk/paddleshift.htm

Youtube geartronics paddleshift

TonyG
Will you be using their pneumatic blipper on the throttle wire?
Old 02-11-2016, 06:10 AM
  #1310  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
Will you be using their pneumatic blipper on the throttle wire?
Yes... I'm going to try it out. If it's not reliable, I'll do a linkage direct to the throttle body (which is more work to do).

TonyG
Old 02-11-2016, 07:52 AM
  #1311  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
Yes... I'm going to try it out. If it's not reliable, I'll do a linkage direct to the throttle body (which is more work to do).

TonyG
I use that blipper in my Geartronics setup. It is reliable so far but I haven't got the downshifts perfectly setup yet. To get the very best rev matching the best solution would be e.g. a Motec ECU with DBW throttle integrated with the Geartronics.
Old 02-11-2016, 09:36 AM
  #1312  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
I use that blipper in my Geartronics setup. It is reliable so far but I haven't got the downshifts perfectly setup yet. To get the very best rev matching the best solution would be e.g. a Motec ECU with DBW throttle integrated with the Geartronics.
I use the motec and dbw, but these systems take a bit of tuning to get just right.
Old 02-11-2016, 09:41 AM
  #1313  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thingo
I use the motec and dbw, but these systems take a bit of tuning to get just right.
It sure does. The more features the more tuning required. I suspect that you run everything related to the paddelshift from the Motec?

The flat shifts are super quick to setup but the downshifts are truly the hard part to tune in.
Old 02-11-2016, 10:09 AM
  #1314  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,704
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Killer video T.
Old 02-11-2016, 10:58 AM
  #1315  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
I use that blipper in my Geartronics setup. It is reliable so far but I haven't got the downshifts perfectly setup yet. To get the very best rev matching the best solution would be e.g. a Motec ECU with DBW throttle integrated with the Geartronics.
What ECU are you using? And what method are you using to unload the engine for the shifts?

TonyG
Old 02-11-2016, 12:18 PM
  #1316  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
What ECU are you using? And what method are you using to unload the engine for the shifts?

TonyG
Link G4+ Xtreme. Closed loop ignition cut, the GCU sends the cut signal to the ECU which cuts the ignition for as long as the signal is active. You can adjust some settings in the ECU for the re-introduction of ignition to smooth it out if necessary.

Here's an in-car clip:
Old 02-11-2016, 12:20 PM
  #1317  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Here's the same clip but with rpm, speedo and gear number. Easier to understand the shifts on this video

Old 02-11-2016, 08:48 PM
  #1318  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I hate you all....


....in the nicest possible way.
Old 02-12-2016, 11:00 AM
  #1319  
disasterman
Three Wheelin'
 
disasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: T.C. Michigan
Posts: 1,861
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ditto Patrick's sentiments. I have the same issue racing against 997 cups.
Old 02-12-2016, 11:15 AM
  #1320  
951and944S
Race Car
 
951and944S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: New Orleans/Baton Rouge
Posts: 3,930
Received 65 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

These kind of mods are pretty much out of most people's league but it's interesting to see fully developed cars like the latest contributors on this last page of the thread.

We race PCA, so unless you are building up an all out GT car, class rules would not allow aftermarket transmissions, and while I really have no reason to investigate this avenue for SP2 and SP3 cars that we race, it made me wonder,

1) In a PCA GT car, you could probably get away with a PDK transmission as it would be "factory Porsche gearbox".

2) Following Tony's links to the pneumatic shifter setup and the transmission itself, by the time you start adding up all the necessary hardware, sorting out the software (as Duke stated)....would it not be possible (and way less expensive) to just find donor parts from salvaged Caymans and just adapt this transmission...?

I was in the transmission business for 25 years, so naturally, when the PDK arrived on the scene, I was curious enough to read as much as I could, although at the time, not much information about internals was out there (probably due to proprietary reasons) and the factory was the only way to get a unit either repaired or refreshed was through a factory exchange program.

When you hear the PCA class Caymans with PDK pass by on track, the gear change speed is unbelievable and it, by design, should be even faster than any pneumatically shifted conventional gearbox, since by design, if I understand correctly by the limited information available at the time, the next gear is already engaged before it's actually selected by the use of twin input shafts (PDK = Porsche double coupling).

T. Simon


Quick Reply: TonyG > New Race Car Build Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:13 AM.