Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

TonyG > New Race Car Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2012, 11:03 PM
  #91  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If I can't buy ORCA, I'll just order my own dammit :-)

TonyG
Old 09-14-2012, 06:13 AM
  #92  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

While Orca is legendary, this will be better. Orca shows it's age. Especially in the Aero and cockpit depts. Subscribed!
Old 09-14-2012, 06:40 AM
  #93  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Very cool. I dig the floor. Must be extremely light with cockpit/rear end design.

As usual there is several ways to skin a cat and in this case I can really not understand why you want to lower the trans. First off the drive shaft angles are screwed up already on a lowered 951 so to correct that the trans should be raised.
Secondly, aerodynamics and getting the total weight of the car lower to the ground should be a priority.
Lowering the trans will restrict how much you can lower the car in total. By raising the trans you can also make sure the exhaust does not protrude underneath the car. This means you can 1) lower the car more and get a greater mass further to the ground compared to a higher car with a lower trans.
2) Greatly increased effectivness of aerodynamics since you now can do a full flat floor very close to the ground.
3) You can also route the exhaust above the rear suspension with a raised trans
4) You can encapsulate the gearbox and do a flat flor and diffusor at the rear.
Old 09-14-2012, 08:55 AM
  #94  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

^This.
Old 09-14-2012, 08:58 AM
  #95  
disasterman
Three Wheelin'
 
disasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: T.C. Michigan
Posts: 1,861
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

If possible, I would appreciate it if you could show some detail on how the fenders attach. I am also interested i how you approach the aero question. After Nasa Nat's we are making plans for Miller and the coming season that include a wide body and a flat bottom.

Your car is going to be great.

Assuming you are looking at ST1 in NASA?

Anyone with any information on advanced aero for these cars please contact me. I am watching closely for any ideas.
Old 09-14-2012, 11:21 AM
  #96  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
Very cool. I dig the floor. Must be extremely light with cockpit/rear end design.

As usual there is several ways to skin a cat and in this case I can really not understand why you want to lower the trans.
Both the engine and transmission are lowered 1/2" to lower the center of gravity of the car, which in-turn lowers the car's roll center.


First off the drive shaft angles are screwed up already on a lowered 951 so to correct that the trans should be raised.
The drive shaft angles are fine. I've been racing the car with a lowered transmission for 4+ years without problems.

Any axle problems I've had had zero to do with the angle of the shaft.

Secondly, aerodynamics and getting the total weight of the car lower to the ground should be a priority.
Lowering the trans will restrict how much you can lower the car in total. By raising the trans you can also make sure the exhaust does not protrude underneath the car. This means you can 1) lower the car more and get a greater mass further to the ground compared to a higher car with a lower trans.
2) Greatly increased effectivness of aerodynamics since you now can do a full flat floor very close to the ground.
3) You can also route the exhaust above the rear suspension with a raised trans
4) You can encapsulate the gearbox and do a flat flor and diffusor at the rear.
We are talking 1/2" on the transmission and engine. Been doing this for years. The drive train of of car represent the biggest portion of the sprung weight of the car. And that's why we lower it. And the 1/2" won't affect the bottom of the car nor will it affect the route of the exhaust system or anything else.

The car is going to be flat bottomed. And as you can see, the pan already has been done. We have a diffuser which is going to be integrated into the rear body work and run up to the pan. The front will be flat bottomed as well with the dual oil coolers being ducted out through the front brakes and the radiator ducted out through the hood louvers.

TonyG
Old 09-14-2012, 11:33 AM
  #97  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Sounds good. I just have a hard time seeing how you can lower the trans, fit a 3+" exhaust and still have a flat bottom without cutting the floor pan or make a side exhaust. But if you can do it that's great.

Not sure the engine, transaxle and transmission is the majority of the sprung weight though.
Old 09-14-2012, 12:54 PM
  #98  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
Not sure the engine, transaxle and transmission is the majority of the sprung weight though.
Motor (LS or 951) ~450lbs assembled, Trans ~140lbs, stock torque tube 60lbs...~650lbs in a car that weighs ~2100...

Would there be any sense in chopping the roof off and replacing the whole thing with FG, relying on the cage for roll-protection? That's a fair bit of weight as high as it gets...

Btw, those rear wheel covers look pretty BA.
Old 09-14-2012, 01:18 PM
  #99  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by V2Rocket_aka944
Motor (LS or 951) ~450lbs assembled, Trans ~140lbs, stock torque tube 60lbs...~650lbs in a car that weighs ~2100...

Would there be any sense in chopping the roof off and replacing the whole thing with FG, relying on the cage for roll-protection? That's a fair bit of weight as high as it gets...

Btw, those rear wheel covers look pretty BA.

2100lbs total weight.
Wheels/suspension/brakes/1/2 of shocks/etc... = 450lbs approx.
.....

1650 total sprung weight
650lbs drive train

650/1650= 39.3%

The drive train = about 39% of the sprung weight.

So... I'm lowering 39% of the car's sprung weight by 1/2". That has a substantial affect on the car's center of gravity.

As far as roof goes.... There is no roof. It's just a skin that probably weights less than 5lbs.


TonyG

Last edited by TonyG; 09-14-2012 at 01:43 PM.
Old 09-14-2012, 01:22 PM
  #100  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

What will the ride height be?
Old 09-14-2012, 01:45 PM
  #101  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
What will the ride height be?
I don't have a specific height.

TonyG
Old 09-14-2012, 11:01 PM
  #102  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

More updates... for today

The wheel tubs are done.
The fuel cell fire wall is done.
The new door fastener/clip is done.

Monday:

Finish the dual Fluidyne oil cooler mounting/ducting

TonyG


.

.

.
Old 09-14-2012, 11:17 PM
  #103  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Next is the install of these two babies with the associated ducting to the brakes....

mu ha ha

TonyG

Old 09-15-2012, 12:04 AM
  #104  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Are you going to mount them either side at the front of the Orca-like bumper panel? Nice work on the wheel tubbing.
Old 09-15-2012, 12:39 AM
  #105  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
Thread Starter
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Are you going to mount them either side at the front of the Orca-like bumper panel? Nice work on the wheel tubbing.
They go on each side of the RH radiator.

Then the exit ducting is funneled to the front rotors and exits through the wheels.

TonyG


Quick Reply: TonyG > New Race Car Build Thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:38 PM.