Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Poor Dyno numbers... need suggestions

Old 04-11-2012, 12:02 AM
  #16  
Zeff
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Zeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by black944 turbo
Zeff, I have a boost tester if you make to Charlotte area.
Thanks for the offer, I've got everything to build one now.

Originally Posted by Brian Broderick
You are climbing up to 13 AFR at higher RPM...That isn't good.

The knock sensor is a Pizo element (like a mic) so it does have a polarity. You do need to torque them correctly and make sure the mounting surface is flat and clean, no washers. Also make sure that the connecting cable does not vibrate or flop around, that can effect the sensor. Lots of Bosch ECU units used the same knock sensor, Volvo 240 and Saab 900 to name a few.
The AFR from the dyno sniffer was a lot different than my wideband, it was showing 11.2-10.8, but I don't have a way to datalog it.

About the sensor... when it is mounted (part# side up) do you know which side/blade is positive?

Originally Posted by zerMATT951
Talk to Joshua about plug temps and gaps too. I was indicating lean at high RPM's and Josh suggested one-step colder plugs, gapped at 022". When I made the change, my AFR's came down any power came back (butt dyno only).
I've got some new bpr7es plugs, but I had them gapped to 026" I'll change that too.

Thanks for the suggestions guys, my roommate didn't have time to help me with checking the header/crossover for leaks tonight. I'll try and get to it Thursday afternoon as I work at 24hr shift starting tomorrow morning.
Old 04-11-2012, 12:30 AM
  #17  
zerMATT951
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
zerMATT951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Cowtown, TX
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

BPR7ES is exactly what Joshua recommended to me. .026 isn't too bad, but .022 is worth a try... hopefully you'll see a difference.
Old 04-11-2012, 01:30 AM
  #18  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zeusrotty
Get an LS2
Such a helpful contribution to this thread.


Originally Posted by Zeff
The AFR from the dyno sniffer was a lot different than my wideband, it was showing 11.2-10.8, but I don't have a way to datalog it.
Interesting - as Shawn mentioned, an exhaust leak will cause the O2 sensor's reading to be off... There should not be that much discrepancy between your WBO2 and the dynos, if everything is sealed up tight.

When idling and the car is warm, is your WBO2 reading ~14.7? If so, I would be more inclined to believe your WBO2 than the dyno.

Definitely check for leaks - both intake and exhaust.
Old 04-11-2012, 01:36 AM
  #19  
Jeff N.
Burning Brakes
 
Jeff N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 991
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Vac leak? Can someone explain that? I could understand a pressure leak.

What do you think you should be putting down?
Old 04-11-2012, 10:07 AM
  #20  
dillon410021
Race Car
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

vacuum and pressure leak are the same things on the 951. when off throttle, the engine is under vacuum, when on boost, everything that was under vacuum is now on positive pressure.
Old 04-11-2012, 10:57 AM
  #21  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I wish you had the boost plotted on the dyno chart. No matter... it looks like it's boosting slow. It looks laggy for that turbo.

That said... Do you have a cat? What Tial wastegate do you have and what spring is in it? And how do you have it plumbed? Also... I'd try a different boost controller.

TonyG
Old 04-11-2012, 07:13 PM
  #22  
Jeff N.
Burning Brakes
 
Jeff N.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bellevue, WA
Posts: 991
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Uh...riiight. Not sure how I didn't put those two together.

Originally Posted by dillon410021
vacuum and pressure leak are the same things on the 951. when off throttle, the engine is under vacuum, when on boost, everything that was under vacuum is now on positive pressure.
Old 04-11-2012, 09:57 PM
  #23  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeff

About the sensor... when it is mounted (part# side up) do you know which side/blade is positive?
I should have put a NOT in the sentence. The knock sensor does NOT have a polarity.

That is strange, went back to the post that needed the "NOT" inserted and I am locked out from changing it. Appears there is a time limit to change posts. That isn't a smart thing to.
Old 04-12-2012, 06:48 PM
  #24  
Zeff
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Zeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Broderick
I should have put a NOT in the sentence. The knock sensor does NOT have a polarity.

That is strange, went back to the post that needed the "NOT" inserted and I am locked out from changing it. Appears there is a time limit to change posts. That isn't a smart thing to.
Thanks man.
Old 04-12-2012, 06:52 PM
  #25  
Zeff
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Zeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyG
I wish you had the boost plotted on the dyno chart. No matter... it looks like it's boosting slow. It looks laggy for that turbo.

That said... Do you have a cat? What Tial wastegate do you have and what spring is in it? And how do you have it plumbed? Also... I'd try a different boost controller.

TonyG
I just did a 'basic' dyno 3 runs with their WB02 sniffer. I've got the Tial 38mm and the .8 or .9bar spring whatever the base one is. I have it in dual port. The boost controller and the wg lines were not touched and the mbc works like it should.

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Such a helpful contribution to this thread.


Interesting - as Shawn mentioned, an exhaust leak will cause the O2 sensor's reading to be off... There should not be that much discrepancy between your WBO2 and the dynos, if everything is sealed up tight.

When idling and the car is warm, is your WBO2 reading ~14.7? If so, I would be more inclined to believe your WBO2 than the dyno.

Definitely check for leaks - both intake and exhaust.
Yes the wb02 reads like 14.3-15 on idle.

I've gotta go take photos of my rommie's mustang then test for exhaust leaks.
Old 04-12-2012, 09:11 PM
  #26  
400hp944
Burning Brakes
 
400hp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think I remember you saying you had the head off recently? If so, be sure your cam timing is set to TDC. I recently had my cam timing jump advanced 2 teeth Tensioner failure). Lag was horrible and power was down by 90HP. Check this to be sure it correct! The car will run fine, just laggy and down HP.

My old K27/6 would see 370lb tq at 3200 rpm.
Old 04-12-2012, 09:17 PM
  #27  
White_951
Rennlist Member
 
White_951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: South Floriduh...
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 400hp944
I think I remember you saying you had the head off recently? If so, be sure your cam timing is set to TDC. I recently had my cam timing jump advanced 2 teeth Tensioner failure). Lag was horrible and power was down by 90HP. Check this to be sure it correct! The car will run fine, just laggy and down HP.

My old K27/6 would see 370lb tq at 3200 rpm.
With everything you've reported so far this sounds much closer to the situation you're experiencing....

You can't have a significant vacuum leak if you're pulling 18in.....
Old 04-13-2012, 01:46 AM
  #28  
TonyG
Rennlist Junkie Forever
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeff
I just did a 'basic' dyno 3 runs with their WB02 sniffer. I've got the Tial 38mm and the .8 or .9bar spring whatever the base one is. I have it in dual port. The boost controller and the wg lines were not touched and the mbc works like it should.
1) There is no "base line spring". You specify what the spring should be (at least that's how I order the wastegates)..

2) Just because you have it in "dual port" doesn't mean it's plumbed properly.

3) Manual boost controllers generally suck. And a lot of that has to do with the wastegate plumbing and spring rate. A properly setup wategate can do a decent job with a manual bleed type boost controller... (the operative word here is "properly setup".

That said... where is your boost plot on the dyno chart? That will tell the story with respect to proper wastegate operation. If you don't have that... then you need to get it. Without it... you're shooting in the dark....


In short..... it's clear that some part of your config is not properly setup.... which is reflected by the laggy TQ curve.

TonyG
Old 04-13-2012, 11:18 AM
  #29  
Zeff
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Zeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 400hp944
I think I remember you saying you had the head off recently? If so, be sure your cam timing is set to TDC. I recently had my cam timing jump advanced 2 teeth Tensioner failure). Lag was horrible and power was down by 90HP. Check this to be sure it correct! The car will run fine, just laggy and down HP.

My old K27/6 would see 370lb tq at 3200 rpm.
I will get that checked out, but that is lower on my list of things to verify.

Originally Posted by TonyG
1) There is no "base line spring". You specify what the spring should be (at least that's how I order the wastegates)..

2) Just because you have it in "dual port" doesn't mean it's plumbed properly.

3) Manual boost controllers generally suck. And a lot of that has to do with the wastegate plumbing and spring rate. A properly setup wategate can do a decent job with a manual bleed type boost controller... (the operative word here is "properly setup".

That said... where is your boost plot on the dyno chart? That will tell the story with respect to proper wastegate operation. If you don't have that... then you need to get it. Without it... you're shooting in the dark....


In short..... it's clear that some part of your config is not properly setup.... which is reflected by the laggy TQ curve.

TonyG
I got the WG used with the plates on here several years ago, so I don't know the official spring, but it is plumed correctly, the WG didn't come out of the car at all and worked fine with my old turbo.

Like I said before, I don't have a boost plot, the shop didn't do one and I have no way to log it.

I did find two possible leaks with the crossover last night, but didn't have time to tighten things up. I will be working on that this afternoon but I'm still waiting on my harness connector for the knock sensor.

Here's a question...

After getting those leaks taken care of, since the knock sensor is still not connected would I even notice a change in spoolup?
Old 04-13-2012, 11:49 AM
  #30  
400hp944
Burning Brakes
 
400hp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=Zeff;9442387]I will get that checked out, but that is lower on my list of things to verify.


It won't take long at all to verify. Set the flywheel to TDC and look through the inspection hole on the cam cover. If you are off by only 1 tooth, it can make a big difference. Unless you have a major leak or as Tony suggests, the waste gate, I would check this first. It's simple and easy and you can rule it out if it's ok.

I just went through this. My HP and TQ curves were shifted way to the right. Spool up sucked and power was down while still holding 17 PSI to red line. It may not be your problem, but it's an easy check.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Poor Dyno numbers... need suggestions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:42 PM.