Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

3.0 bar reg. and chips==> How do you pass emissions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2003, 04:27 PM
  #1  
2+2
Pro
Thread Starter
 
2+2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 3.0 bar reg. and chips==> How do you pass emissions?

Those of you with chips and especially chips with 3.0 bar fuel pressure regulators, how do you guys pass emissions testing. I would think that your cars would fail because of the added fuel?!? Anyone have such a set up with experience in this field? Thanks
Old 04-29-2003, 04:56 PM
  #2  
TT
Racer
 
TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If your chips are designed for use with the 3bar FPR, they will readjust the fuel maps for the extra fuel. My car just recently passed emissions here in MD with the 3bar FPR setup and a readjusted stock chip. Gas cap pressurization failed, but they waived it.
Old 04-29-2003, 05:44 PM
  #3  
Alpine951
Drifting
 
Alpine951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

My chips did not require the 3 bar but I added it last year. Car passed two weeks ago no problem. Time to take the cat off and put the test pipe back.
Old 04-29-2003, 05:47 PM
  #4  
Matt Sheppard
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Matt Sheppard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Kalifornyuh
Posts: 1,941
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

I just did mine (California smog - test only)

I cheated and put the 2.5 BAR regulator and stock computers back in . . . Passed just fine.

Old 04-29-2003, 06:53 PM
  #5  
2+2
Pro
Thread Starter
 
2+2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

TT: I thought your chips would be tuned for more HP at 3 bar so it would burn quantitatively more fuel through out the rev range resulting in higher emissions than allowed for a stock car?!?

Alpine: interesting...I would not think you could pass. Maybe MA tests are not as tough?

Matt: That is the scenario I would want to avoid..dont need the hassle, already have to put in cat.
Old 04-29-2003, 07:08 PM
  #6  
RJP 951
Racer
 
RJP 951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

In Ohio, you get a "collector car" license plate. In addition to proudly letting people know of your car's collector status, it means the car is exempt from emissions testing.

Ron
Old 04-29-2003, 08:38 PM
  #7  
TT
Racer
 
TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Huntingtown, MD
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica"> TT: I thought your chips would be tuned for more HP at 3 bar so it would burn quantitatively more fuel through out the rev range resulting in higher emissions than allowed for a stock car?!? </font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">The way to more HP is more air. All the aftermarket kits do this various ways (shims, jetted banjo bolts, etc.) to get your boost above the stock level of 10 psi. The 3 bar FPR chips are adjusted to keep the AFR basically at the stock levels (some a bit richer) under engine loads where emissions are tested. They will go even richer under heavy loads or boost, but that won't matter for your emissions test.
Old 04-30-2003, 12:42 AM
  #8  
SherionG
Intermediate
 
SherionG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I am only running stage two chips in my 951 with a 3" testpipe, but was able to pass my inspection in Texas. Prior to the inspection, I got the engine pretty hot, worth the time too.
Old 04-30-2003, 03:16 AM
  #9  
turbite
Burning Brakes
 
turbite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I left the chips and FPR in for the smog, and everything went fine.

I peeled the sticker off the FPR, and they had no idea it was adjustable. In fact, I think the probably thought the damper was the FPR.

Either way, they didnt know/care.
Old 04-30-2003, 10:51 AM
  #10  
sybelix
Burning Brakes
 
sybelix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

By using Guru stuff chips..no problems..
Old 04-30-2003, 04:49 PM
  #11  
Danno
Race Director
 
Danno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 14,075
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Post

Thanks Tommy! <img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" />

"I thought your chips would be tuned for more HP at 3 bar so it would burn quantitatively more fuel through out the rev range resulting in higher emissions than allowed for a stock car?!?"

The way our chips are designed is to work WITH a 3-bar FPR. So at idle where flow is the same as stock, I dial back the fuel -9% to compensate for the higher fuel-pressure. Then as you go up the maps to higher loads and flow, I actually dial back fuel a little in the mid-range because the stock chips are a little rich. Then in the full-load, high-RPM range, there is more fuel to match the higher flow-rates of higher-boost & big turbos.

So the way the mapping works is that the lowest amount of fuel dispensed (idle) is less than stock, while the highest amount (full-load, high-RPM) has more than stock. So the lowest valleys are lower and the highest peaks are higher on the 3D maps. It's kinda like dynamic range in music.

Then to scale for injector sizings, I just subtract a fixed percentage from the duty-cycle based the ratios of the new injector size compared to stock. This scales the entire fuel-maps up and down linearly without modifying them. This also preserves the same look-up point so you don't skew your ignition values.
Old 04-30-2003, 05:36 PM
  #12  
Chris Evans
Intermediate
 
Chris Evans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Man that must suck to have emissions testing. I dont have a cat on any of my vehicles. I ran straight down pipe on my Supra and Eclipse. I guess there are some advantages to live in Oldham County Kentucky with all the Mustang and Camaro boys,lol.
Old 04-30-2003, 06:09 PM
  #13  
turbo944
Three Wheelin'
 
turbo944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burlington, NC
Posts: 1,717
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Hehe...same here. I registered my car through my parents address as my permanent address since I'm bouncing around till I move away from the area in a few months and plan to leave it registered there once I'm gone. Can't beat a $25 a year registration and no emissions testing!

Cheers!
Old 04-30-2003, 06:11 PM
  #14  
2+2
Pro
Thread Starter
 
2+2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: N. Virginia
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Danno, so with your set up, your customers have not had any problems passing emissions testing?? Even in CA??



Quick Reply: 3.0 bar reg. and chips==> How do you pass emissions?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:53 AM.