Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Patrick's build thread. (IT RUNS!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2017, 12:00 AM
  #1246  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Got a feeling that the block has been plugged anyway. The covers are superficial I believe.
Hope so. I'd keep an eye on it anyway.

Originally Posted by JET951
I see the new WTAC regs are out Patrick, No H pattern gearboxes allowed, too much of an advantage over those archaic sequentials.
Sean
HAHA.
Old 03-03-2017, 08:19 PM
  #1247  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

So the new 2-1 (x2) headers are on the motor with double bungs for EGTs and Lambda. A ton of work has gone into them to make everything fit and also allow for max expansion. So far there's 7 slip joints on the system. Bit more work to go and then off to be coated. Much more time con$uming than I'd imagined. It's almost like running two 2 cylinder motors. Obviously quite a different motor to Shawn's latest build but promising numbers / curves for that give me hopes for this one.
Attached Images    

Last edited by 333pg333; 03-04-2017 at 01:53 AM.
Old 03-03-2017, 09:02 PM
  #1248  
Jon951
Instructor
 
Jon951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Near Atlanta GA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome build. Beautiful creative work!
Old 03-04-2017, 01:16 AM
  #1249  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice work!
Old 03-04-2017, 08:58 PM
  #1250  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Looking Good Patrick!
Old 03-04-2017, 11:19 PM
  #1251  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Thanks guys. Few more bits and pieces to do and then finish the exhaust. We bought a new radiator too for a bit of preventative maintenance so that's going in shortly. Then a bit more wiring to run the new ECU / Dash. Then just wait for the intake. We're in a queue for that. Probably still 4-6 weeks away on that as his multi axis router was down for 4 weeks waiting on parts itself.
Old 03-05-2017, 01:39 PM
  #1252  
gruhsy
Drifting
 
gruhsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,559
Received 51 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Great photos! Thanks.
Old 03-05-2017, 04:10 PM
  #1253  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Looks very nice. The twin scroll will allow you to get enough separation between cylinders that the 180-degree exhaust interference is eliminated. That'll allow you a lot of freedom with cams.

What are the ports for in the primaries? EGT sensors, or high-sampling-rate pressure sensors?

The pipes have a quite a bit of surface area. Have you considered thermal barrier coating them? Purely functional, hiding all the beautiful stainless there...

Any thoughts on how well those slip fits will seal over time? Double slip? Also, will you have spring loaded locks on those?

Does the pipe size got up at the first Ys that combine 1&4 and 2&3? Have you given consideration to what sort of wave will that junction send back to the exhaust port? Just thinking out loud, I don't have any terrible well organized thoughts on that. Some people talk about "cross-tuning" in 4-2-1 headers and then some headers have steps to send back a reflected negative wave timed to the point when exhaust valve seat would otherwise go "sub-sonic". But as I said, just thinking out loud.
Old 03-05-2017, 05:38 PM
  #1254  
ealoken
Three Wheelin'
 
ealoken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,331
Received 114 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Superb job
Old 03-05-2017, 10:22 PM
  #1255  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Looks very nice. The twin scroll will allow you to get enough separation between cylinders that the 180-degree exhaust interference is eliminated. That'll allow you a lot of freedom with cams.

What are the ports for in the primaries? EGT sensors, or high-sampling-rate pressure sensors?

The pipes have a quite a bit of surface area. Have you considered thermal barrier coating them? Purely functional, hiding all the beautiful stainless there...

Any thoughts on how well those slip fits will seal over time? Double slip? Also, will you have spring loaded locks on those?

Does the pipe size got up at the first Ys that combine 1&4 and 2&3? Have you given consideration to what sort of wave will that junction send back to the exhaust port? Just thinking out loud, I don't have any terrible well organized thoughts on that. Some people talk about "cross-tuning" in 4-2-1 headers and then some headers have steps to send back a reflected negative wave timed to the point when exhaust valve seat would otherwise go "sub-sonic". But as I said, just thinking out loud.
Yes, the twin scroll is meant to offer a nice improvement in response / driveability.

Two sets of bungs per cylinder. One for EGTs and the other for Lambda sensors. Want to have as much control over the tune of this motor as possible.

All the pipes will be coated once they're finished. Yes a shame to hide the steel but we've never had an issue with the coaters we use. Definitely more efficient than uncoated.

Hard to say on the slip joints. There's a lot of them so hopefully they can work together to minimise individual movement. Some will have the lock tabs.

I think with the headers unless you have access to powerful CFD or are willing to make a number of versions and just do trial and error, it is just too expensive and labour intensive and we come down to the 'best guess' method. Interestingly when you see the turbine housing, both split sides are not identical looking. Not quite sure what effect this will have but assume Borg Warner has done a lot of R&D to come up with this arrangement.

Originally Posted by ealoken
Superb job
Thankyou. I just pay the bills.
Old 03-07-2017, 06:13 AM
  #1256  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Wastegates now tied in.
Attached Images  
Old 03-07-2017, 07:54 AM
  #1257  
ptuomov
Nordschleife Master
 
ptuomov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 5,610
Received 81 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Wastegates now tied in.
Did you consider expansion joint on that wastegate pipe? I think the wastegate pipe that sees variable flow is going to expand and contract most and out of synch with the rest of the system. Baybe the slip joints take care of it.
Old 03-07-2017, 11:19 AM
  #1258  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,498
Received 633 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

patrick after all this (and surely you have a dry sump still?) why not tilt the engine upright?
Old 03-07-2017, 11:39 AM
  #1259  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nice work again. I wish you had a single scroll already on this motor to see the difference.
Old 03-07-2017, 05:19 PM
  #1260  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ptuomov
Did you consider expansion joint on that wastegate pipe? I think the wastegate pipe that sees variable flow is going to expand and contract most and out of synch with the rest of the system. Baybe the slip joints take care of it.
I hope so too. There's a lot of slip joints through the whole system. Time will tell.

Originally Posted by V2Rocket
patrick after all this (and surely you have a dry sump still?) why not tilt the engine upright?
Just too many other things to consider and budget is flying out the door.

Originally Posted by Paulyy
Nice work again. I wish you had a single scroll already on this motor to see the difference.
Lol...so do I in some ways. This whole idea of changing the turbo and going twin scroll has been a major exerci$e. Much more than I'd imagined. As Gustaf says, he made his decision on ROI and he might well be correct. I based much of my decision on Rod's experience with Twin Scroll turbos being very favourable.


Quick Reply: Patrick's build thread. (IT RUNS!)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:58 AM.