Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Patrick's build thread. (IT RUNS!)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2016, 12:45 AM
  #1141  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Been quite a long time between posts on the 16v motor. There have been a few design changes and part delays along the way also.

Block has been Nikasil treated for extra hardness. The main studs holes have been additionally strengthened by a version of a Time Sert. With the extra torque loading on these 25yr old blocks and larger headstuds it was deemed a worthwhile modification. We did something similar down here with the 2.5 8v racemotor.

Certain parts such as bearings and rings have been coated with an anti friction coating used by Honda in F1. Ultimately we would like to use a custom crank but at this stage it is a stock crank with some lightening (approx 6 lbs I think) and has been modified to a 94mm offset grind to enhance torque. The main issue we have with our car is the stock Syncromesh 6 speed vs competitors with Sequential Transmissions which are a massive improvement. So we need to maximise torque to give us a lot of drive off the corners and possibly reduce the amount of gear changes. The old 3.1 8v had about 720Nm of tq to the rear wheels which is a lot. Hopefully the 16v motor can give us something similar.

The cams are being ground now and they've been designed more around mid range than totally upper rpm. The valve train will be capable of spinning out to well over 9000rpm but we'll not get up that high. Not quite sure where we'll set the rpm cut. Perhaps around about 8000rpm and a soft cut rather than the hard cut we've been running on the previous motors. Just a bit more friendly to the components. The head was flowed to a max of 370cfm at 25". It was decided to not go overboard on the exhaust side to try and induce more rapid response both on and off boost. Potentially the superior head and 3.2 capacity should ensure that we can reach similar power (say 550whp) at lower boost than before therefore enhancing reliability. It will be running adjustable twin cam wheels at the front of the motor with a modified tensioner to increase belt wrap on the custom crank pulley.

There will be a custom ATI damper to quell harmonics but also incorporate a pulley to run the alt belt off. The idea is to shorten the parts hanging off the nose of the crank to further reduce the possibility of crank distortion which we felt was the likely reason for the failure of the 3.1 motor. The balance shafts have been removed. We felt that the main purpose for the balance shafts is to deal with harmonics in the mid range. In addition, they were designed and built with the stock motor all those years ago. With every single part in the new motor changing in weight, size, balance etc it was felt that they were almost redundant.

The head will be sealed via a custom Cometic gasket designed to run with custom Garlock sealing rings. Due to some changes in their company structure these Garlocks have taken many months to procure. Hopefully they do the trick combined with the possible lower boost needed.

I went down the path of changing to a Borg Warner twin scroll EFR turbo. I would really like to change to one of these, however budget is tight and this would have added about $10k to the build with changes to the headers, X overs, turbo and I would have also changed the exhaust to a larger than 3" straight through system. So reluctantly we decided to keep all the externals that we have and at least we can compare this motor to the 2 previous ones apples to apples as such. We will move up to the largest turbine housing for the GTX3582r and therefore our setup will be quite similar to Gustaf's motor which achieved very good figures on the dyno. I'm not expecting quite the same figures on the basis of expected pessimism but even 80% of what he got will be very pleasing. The main difference will probably be the length of inlet runners. His are quite a bit shorter. Due to budget and also packaging constraints I have decided that we will probably just modify the intake we have now. Enhancing the tq with the longer runners won't be such a bad thing.

The rods are custom design Carillo and pistons are short skirt CP. Obviously considerably lighter than stock.

The stock water pump is being blocked off and we will be using a Davies-Craig electric product.

The block and head will be sent down to us within the next 10 days. We can start working on fitting the motor and rejigging the headers and inlet. Also fit the water pump. The cams and drive pulleys plus tensioner will follow shortly afterwards. Hopefully not too long to get this motor in the car and tuned. More pics to follow.
Attached Images        
Old 04-05-2016, 04:35 AM
  #1142  
944crazy
Pro
 
944crazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 646
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That is looking very awesome Patrick! Nice to see things are coming together for you. Keen to see what your monster can do with a 16V engine, I wish you the very best of luck with it!
Old 04-05-2016, 04:51 AM
  #1143  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Great work Patrick thanks for the update!

What oil you gonna run?

(just kidding - PLEASE DON't answer that... )

Cheers,
Mike
Old 04-05-2016, 04:54 AM
  #1144  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Fish Oil...isn't everyone advocating this nowadays Mike?
Old 04-05-2016, 04:58 AM
  #1145  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

True - only problem is: all the molecules have to be above a certain size or you have to throw them back...
Old 04-05-2016, 05:00 AM
  #1146  
mikey_audiogeek
Three Wheelin'
 
mikey_audiogeek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,547
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

...and the limit is half a litre per day per car...
Old 04-05-2016, 05:24 AM
  #1147  
AlphaOmegaPower
Pro
 
AlphaOmegaPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 521
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That's some nasty cfm on that head. Definitely want to see this dyno compared to your other engine and then to a couple of our counterparts with 16v turbos. I think with all that are happening finally we will get a whole lot more info........ Basically telling us what we already knew. Lol
Old 04-05-2016, 06:59 AM
  #1148  
Adonay
Rennlist Member
 
Adonay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: norway and or sweden
Posts: 839
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Very interesting. I like The waterpump mod, i was researching that a while ago for my other motor. Any pictures of that block off plate? Can more be produced ?
Will you run an electronic servo pump as well?
Love all these stroker builds.
Old 04-05-2016, 07:32 AM
  #1149  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,250
Received 32 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Is the new engine using the oil squirter jets in the block ?
Old 04-05-2016, 08:56 AM
  #1150  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Awesome build Patrick! Is that head flow at 25" WC or 28" WC?
Old 04-05-2016, 02:12 PM
  #1151  
Kris H
Instructor
 
Kris H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shawn: 25" - it's there in the description
Old 04-05-2016, 05:34 PM
  #1152  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 944crazy
That is looking very awesome Patrick! Nice to see things are coming together for you. Keen to see what your monster can do with a 16V engine, I wish you the very best of luck with it!
Thanks Timm. There's always plenty of luck in this game. Much of it bad! Need good luck combined with good design and construction to have success. Hoping to plenty of all of that.

Originally Posted by AlphaOmegaPower
That's some nasty cfm on that head. Definitely want to see this dyno compared to your other engine and then to a couple of our counterparts with 16v turbos. I think with all that are happening finally we will get a whole lot more info........ Basically telling us what we already knew. Lol
That's the one good thing. We will be able to make direct comparisons at least.

Originally Posted by Adonay
Very interesting. I like The waterpump mod, i was researching that a while ago for my other motor. Any pictures of that block off plate? Can more be produced ?
Will you run an electronic servo pump as well?
Love all these stroker builds.
I have seen the block off plate yet but indeed more can be made I'm sure. Been using an electric steering pump for a while. It's inside the cabin.

Originally Posted by blade7
Is the new engine using the oil squirter jets in the block ?
Yes, squirters are there.

Originally Posted by refresh951
Awesome build Patrick! Is that head flow at 25" WC or 28" WC?
25" Shawn. He could have made it flow more but felt that this might put more strain on other components or involve changing components to superior ones. There's a limit to budget and our target is to improve upon the 3.1L motor but not necessarily double it sort of thing. The ports in the 968 heads are very large to begin. He modified them somewhat and we're running 41mm & 35mm valves.
Old 04-05-2016, 10:20 PM
  #1153  
refresh951
Rennlist Member
 
refresh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Marietta, Georgia
Posts: 3,365
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

That number at 25" WC is a fantastic result. MM had previously posted these numbers:

944 4V / Full Porting / 41mm intake valve / 28" CFM
.100 114
.200 221
.300 323
.400 369
.500 383
Old 04-06-2016, 12:29 AM
  #1154  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Looks good Patrick, big valves, we decided to go without the damper ( bhj from rsbarn).
Old 04-06-2016, 01:08 AM
  #1155  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by refresh951
That number at 25" WC is a fantastic result. MM had previously posted these numbers:

944 4V / Full Porting / 41mm intake valve / 28" CFM
.100 114
.200 221
.300 323
.400 369
.500 383
Our numbers were at a higher lift Shawn. I believe at 28" it is right around similar flow and lift numbers to Michael's. Having said that, I think these numbers are as comparable as dyno numbers due to barometric conditions. Pretty sure I saw were high end Evo motors flow at least 100cfm less. Smaller valves, sure, but I think the Porsche engineers really knew what they were doing back then.

Originally Posted by thingo
Looks good Patrick, big valves, we decided to go without the damper ( bhj from rsbarn).
Lower than your flow rates Rod but good enough for our objectives. So you're running no b/shafts or damper? I have the same one from RS Barn but the new one should be a little better in design.


Quick Reply: Patrick's build thread. (IT RUNS!)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:18 PM.