Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

failed emissions for hydrocarbons I PASSED :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2011, 05:56 PM
  #16  
dillon410021
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Basically, schip43 is correct. Less timing will produce a lower combustion chamber temps, which will help lower NOx.
Which setting on the fqs switch should I choose and do I still need to add fuel to the map?
thanks


Below is from LINDSEY RACING (< I am giving credit to LR for this )!
http://www.lindseyracing.com/LR/Parts/DMEFQSSWITCH.html

The DME FQS Switch Adjustment is located in the DME computer box. The FQS switch has a triangular female socket in the end for a special tool. We use a 2.5mm Allen wrench to adjust the switch. It's a snug fit and you should insert it with care. Chip sets purchased after 02-10-09 will include the allen wrench.

When you rotate the switch all the way counter-clockwise until it stops, that's considered position 0. From there, the first click clock-wise from there is position 1, next click is position 2 and so on.

FQS Positions for 944 8v from '85/2 and 944 Turbo

Switch Position /Fuel Mixture /Ignition Timing
O stock 0% 0%
1 +3% 0º
2 -3% 0º
3 +6% 0º
4 0% -3º
5 +3% -3º
6 -3% -3º
7 +6% -3º
Old 08-19-2011, 05:59 PM
  #17  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Which position was it in during your last test?
Old 08-20-2011, 01:15 AM
  #18  
dillon410021
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Which position was it in during your last test?
I will have to check. I would assume stock
Old 08-20-2011, 04:01 PM
  #19  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dillon410021
I will have to check. I would assume stock
Well you know would they about "assuming"! I would "assume" it's not in the stock position!

Let us know.
Old 08-21-2011, 12:22 PM
  #20  
dillon410021
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default UPDATE

I checked the fqs and it is in the stock position (position 0= turned all the way counter-clockwise). What position should I change it to to lower the nox?
Thanks Rennlist
Old 08-21-2011, 01:49 PM
  #21  
Scott H
Three Wheelin'
 
Scott H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

FQS 4 will leave the mixture unchanged while pulling 3* of timing from everywhere.
Old 08-21-2011, 01:55 PM
  #22  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

What chips, FPR, and injectors do you have, and do you have the factory AFM or an aftermarket MAF? And how old is your factory O2 sensor? If you have stock chips, FPR, injectors and AFM sitting around, and put in a new O2 sensor, I bet you will pass. As is, it looks like you are running leaner than needed -- your HC and CO levels are way below their limits while NOx is too high.
Old 08-21-2011, 03:24 PM
  #23  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'd use pos 5
Old 08-21-2011, 03:50 PM
  #24  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yep, use either position 4 or 5... Position 5 will lower NOx more, but will raise HC some.
Old 08-21-2011, 05:35 PM
  #25  
dillon410021
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
dillon410021's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LaPorte, IN 46350
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Yep, use either position 4 or 5... Position 5 will lower NOx more, but will raise HC some.
ok, I will try position 5 on tuesday and reveal the results
Old 08-21-2011, 05:39 PM
  #26  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I like FQS 4, FTW!
Old 08-21-2011, 06:06 PM
  #27  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Does the FQS work the same on all aftermarket chips? I thought not. And, does it retard by the full x degrees across all rpm's and load ranges?
Old 08-21-2011, 06:22 PM
  #28  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Does the FQS work the same on all aftermarket chips? I thought not. And, does it retard by the full x degrees across all rpm's and load ranges?
The FQS is adjusted to whatever the tuner set it to...

That is a good point, if you don't know what the settings are, you are safer going to position 4, rather than position 5. Almost always tuners leave the ~3° timing retard alone, and only adjust the FQS fuel mapping.

And additionally, the FQS timing reduction is only in-effect above 1600rpm, IIRC.
Old 08-21-2011, 06:23 PM
  #29  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Old 08-21-2011, 07:51 PM
  #30  
ibkevin
Defending the Border
Rennlist Member

Rest In Peace
 
ibkevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sun Diego
Posts: 17,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

brand new 3" magnaflow cat from sfr.
Too bad you didn't do a search. New Magnaflow 3" sfr cat here for cheap.

Check the O2 for dithering and make sure there aren't any upstream leaks, even the smallest will kill a rolling dyno test.


Quick Reply: failed emissions for hydrocarbons I PASSED :)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:20 AM.