Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

16 Valve 2.5?

Old 05-24-2011, 11:38 AM
  #1  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default 16 Valve 2.5?

Is this a viable option for a 2.5? Can it be done at a reasonable cost and is it worth doing? I don't recall seeing this done?

Just wondering because these days the big numbers seem to be done with motors (4 cylinders) that are 500 cc smaller than ours but have 16 valve heads.
For that matter the Subbies (STI) are 2.5 16 valve heads.

Just wondering if it's something worth pursuing?
Old 05-24-2011, 11:51 AM
  #2  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Definitely has been done. Chris White has pistons available. There is another lister that is doing it now by flycutting the stock pistons.

I want to do it but have to wait until I can get to a better financial position.
Old 05-24-2011, 11:52 AM
  #3  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I think Chris White is working on a 2.6 16v or finished. cannot remember but it's in his PM.

I wouldn't mind doing it my self but then i always just think 3L
Old 05-24-2011, 12:11 PM
  #4  
pettybird
Burning Brakes
 
pettybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

it's not worth it. There's more power but not enough to justify the expense or aggravation.

I own an S, and I own a turbo. Would make more sense to get a wrecked turbo and convert than a wrecked 16V car and convert.
Old 05-24-2011, 12:29 PM
  #5  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pettybird
it's not worth it. There's more power but not enough to justify the expense or aggravation.

I own an S, and I own a turbo. Would make more sense to get a wrecked turbo and convert than a wrecked 16V car and convert.
So is that the 944 S, your talking about? I know the power did go up over the standard NA but the redline stayed the same? That strikes me as a bit odd, I kinda thought the benefits of a DOHC head was higher rpm?

You got any links to the builds on here?
Old 05-24-2011, 12:42 PM
  #6  
blown 944
Race Car
 
blown 944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Firestone, Colorado
Posts: 4,826
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

To be clear, we are talking about a turbocharged 2.5l 16v engine correct prettybird? I can't see how it would not be beneficial unless you are just after a 300 hp car, then I could see the tq of tge 8v being better.
Old 05-24-2011, 01:06 PM
  #7  
JohnKoaWood
Nordschleife Master
 
JohnKoaWood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fly Away
Posts: 7,759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Take a turbo motor, add head and pistons from Chris White (he HAS all the bits needed in his shop RIGHT NOW), and you are off... just takes several metric loads of $$ (IIRC the heads are worth about 1K, pistons about the same, stand alone ~3K, intake and exhaust another 3-4K depending on options.. full engine rebuild with proper bits going in to support the bigger power ~3-5K)

He has done at least one or two of them, required bits IMHO would be stand alone, higher volume fuel system, and the required bits being custom intake and exhaust (Speed Force Racing offers these bits, but be prepared for sticker shock..even though they are well worth it)..

IIRC 2.5L 8V is at its limits about 400 HP, 2.5 16V is about there at 500rwhp..

Either way, to maximize the usefullness you will need other supporting mods to accomplish this... it deffinitely isn't bolt in, however the supporting mods (including the intake and exhaust) can convey over to a 3L 16V motor quite nicely!

However be prepared to spend between 10 and 15K to get there, and you will still have a 2.5L displacement... same money can get a decent 3L... without supporting mods to the chasis..

Dont forget brakes, induction cooling system, exhaust, turbo, suspension... should I continue?
Old 05-24-2011, 01:56 PM
  #8  
67King
Race Car
 
67King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 3,641
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Horsepower is a function of airflow. Airflow is a function of valve area available for airflow. A stock head has a single 45mm intake valve. A 16V has two 37mm valves (the 968 has two 39mm valves). That is 35% more airflow area. A well built 2.5L 16V has a lot more horsepower potential, if less torque potential, than an 8V 3.0L, unless the 3.0L has had a lot of head work done. A LOT.

The pent roof chamber and central plug allows you to run about 0.7 points more CR with the same level of detonation robustness, ceteris paribus. A bigger bore hurts your ability to run more CR. That'll get you another 3-4% torque and power across the board.

The head has to come off of a 2.5L (i.e. a 944S), I believe (I believe the water passages are different on the 104mm bore engines). I don't know what valve material they are, but if they are not one piece stainless, you'd be wise to get that. That's probably $300.

I had a conversation with Karl Poeltl of Racer's Edge, who is the NA distributor for Wossner pistons, late last week about this. They sell a lot of these pistons, so folks who spend more time in their garage than on Rennlist are apparently doing this. A set is right around $1000. I'm friends with Karl, and he is local to me, so I'd go with him, but there's no doubt Chris White would do you right, too.

Then you need to fab an intake. And cutting up a turbo intake and welding it to an S flange is not fabbing an intake, you are just choking off all of that valve area you just gained by doing a 16V. If you've got a TIG and can weld aluminum, figure a couple hundred bucks for bellmounths (Acura sells them for their V6's, which is a good affordable option, but I can't recall how big they are) and stock aluminum. If not, figure probably $500 or so for someone else to fab it up.

Figure new rings at $400.

You are probably looking at $2000 to do it, assuming you can do it all yourself, and have the 16V head (throw in another $500 or so if you don't). And that is before you get into the bigger turbo and controls systems.
Old 05-24-2011, 02:08 PM
  #9  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blown 944
To be clear, we are talking about a turbocharged 2.5l 16v engine correct prettybird? I can't see how it would not be beneficial unless you are just after a 300 hp car, then I could see the tq of tge 8v being better.
Yep, just the head, a 2.5 is still a big 4. I'm just wondering why the 500 cc doesn't seem to have a bigger impact on the numbers.

And yeah in the 60 to 150 mph range mine is a runner, I've had to do a beat down that required 60 to 90 and at 90 I was gone! Not a fan of tail gaters!
Old 05-24-2011, 02:25 PM
  #10  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

the STIs need over 20 psi to go anywhere. i had a roll race with one when i first had my 951 running 15 psi with a 100% stock exhaust and he had 15 psi 3" and a few other minor things. and i literly blew his doors off. he had more of a responce but still not as much torque.

Just by a quick read that you do need to change the pistons might aswel go S2 block and start there and get more power for less boost.
Old 05-24-2011, 02:34 PM
  #11  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JohnKoaWood
Take a turbo motor, add head and pistons from Chris White (he HAS all the bits needed in his shop RIGHT NOW), and you are off... just takes several metric loads of $$ (IIRC the heads are worth about 1K, pistons about the same, stand alone ~3K, intake and exhaust another 3-4K depending on options.. full engine rebuild with proper bits going in to support the bigger power ~3-5K)

He has done at least one or two of them, required bits IMHO would be stand alone, higher volume fuel system, and the required bits being custom intake and exhaust (Speed Force Racing offers these bits, but be prepared for sticker shock..even though they are well worth it)..

IIRC 2.5L 8V is at its limits about 400 HP, 2.5 16V is about there at 500rwhp..

Either way, to maximize the usefullness you will need other supporting mods to accomplish this... it deffinitely isn't bolt in, however the supporting mods (including the intake and exhaust) can convey over to a 3L 16V motor quite nicely!

However be prepared to spend between 10 and 15K to get there, and you will still have a 2.5L displacement... same money can get a decent 3L... without supporting mods to the chasis..

Dont forget brakes, induction cooling system, exhaust, turbo, suspension... should I continue?
Ugh!

Originally Posted by 67King
Horsepower is a function of airflow. Airflow is a function of valve area available for airflow. A stock head has a single 45mm intake valve. A 16V has two 37mm valves (the 968 has two 39mm valves). That is 35% more airflow area. A well built 2.5L 16V has a lot more horsepower potential, if less torque potential, than an 8V 3.0L, unless the 3.0L has had a lot of head work done. A LOT.

The pent roof chamber and central plug allows you to run about 0.7 points more CR with the same level of detonation robustness, ceteris paribus. A bigger bore hurts your ability to run more CR. That'll get you another 3-4% torque and power across the board.

The head has to come off of a 2.5L (i.e. a 944S), I believe (I believe the water passages are different on the 104mm bore engines). I don't know what valve material they are, but if they are not one piece stainless, you'd be wise to get that. That's probably $300.

I had a conversation with Karl Poeltl of Racer's Edge, who is the NA distributor for Wossner pistons, late last week about this. They sell a lot of these pistons, so folks who spend more time in their garage than on Rennlist are apparently doing this. A set is right around $1000. I'm friends with Karl, and he is local to me, so I'd go with him, but there's no doubt Chris White would do you right, too.

Then you need to fab an intake. And cutting up a turbo intake and welding it to an S flange is not fabbing an intake, you are just choking off all of that valve area you just gained by doing a 16V. If you've got a TIG and can weld aluminum, figure a couple hundred bucks for bellmounths (Acura sells them for their V6's, which is a good affordable option, but I can't recall how big they are) and stock aluminum. If not, figure probably $500 or so for someone else to fab it up.

Figure new rings at $400.

You are probably looking at $2000 to do it, assuming you can do it all yourself, and have the 16V head (throw in another $500 or so if you don't). And that is before you get into the bigger turbo and controls systems.
Ugh again!

But OK the good news is a 500 hp vs 400 but then a 3 liter is 500 hp potential also? So is it the same cost for a 3L short block (8 valve head) vs a 16 valve head with a 2.5 block?

Yeah I'm not a welder ( and yeah I'm on the internet and not in the garage!) so I'd have to get the manifolds done just wondering about the potential and viability streetability of this combo. Would it be any more or less useless in 4th at 55 and low rpm or the same as I have now just even crazier when it gets on boost?
Old 05-24-2011, 02:57 PM
  #12  
pettybird
Burning Brakes
 
pettybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by schip43
So is that the 944 S, your talking about? I know the power did go up over the standard NA but the redline stayed the same? That strikes me as a bit odd, I kinda thought the benefits of a DOHC head was higher rpm?

You got any links to the builds on here?

redline goes up by a few hundred RPM.

I was talking NA, but the expense parts still applies to a turbo car... vMax goes up but at a hell of a price.
Old 05-24-2011, 03:51 PM
  #13  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paulyy
the STIs need over 20 psi to go anywhere. i had a roll race with one when i first had my 951 running 15 psi with a 100% stock exhaust and he had 15 psi 3" and a few other minor things. and i literly blew his doors off. he had more of a responce but still not as much torque.

Just by a quick read that you do need to change the pistons might aswel go S2 block and start there and get more power for less boost.
Oh you STI bashers! I just used it as an example (STI) because it's a multi valve head and a 2.5.
Yeah in a roll on 8 valve 2.5 does very well, just wondering about the head. The S2 is the 3 liter DOHC correct? So I see your point, since it would take custom manifolds anyway! But even granted that these are Porsches ( Poor Red headed step children, they my be but still Porsches) and not Honda's it can't be the same cost for putting a 16 valve head on a 2.5 as building a 3.0?

I ask that because I know most of the 3 liter builds use the 8 valve head! Kinda of a big circle here?
Old 05-24-2011, 03:58 PM
  #14  
pettybird
Burning Brakes
 
pettybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

they use a 2.7 head on the 3 liter because the intake bolts up. it's all about cubic dollars.

944S=2.5l
944S2=3.0l
968=3.0l variable valve timing (VTEC YO)
Old 05-24-2011, 04:08 PM
  #15  
MooreBoost
Three Wheelin'
 
MooreBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,622
Received 23 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

im doing a 2.5 16v turbo so i can stay in a lower class in nasa.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 16 Valve 2.5?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:18 PM.