Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

16v vs 8v head turbo application - max static compression ?

Old 01-16-2011, 06:15 AM
  #31  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?t=1575817

...sure it's a little laggy...but there's some $$$ being burnt out there....
You've got to be ****ing kidding me. That's insane. What the ****? Jesus Christ.

Before I would do that, I think I would just install a turboshaft.
Old 01-16-2011, 06:30 AM
  #32  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

If you want to read further this is the actual forum that it appeared in. Of course you can't go with something like this on a forum without the usual forum wars....but in amongst this there is some interesting theory which gets quite involved. Especially by the O.P.

http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-dyn...ne-2007-a.html
Old 01-16-2011, 06:41 AM
  #33  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

That 4G63 build is INSANE! Totally awesome.
Old 01-16-2011, 07:50 AM
  #34  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

It is insane alright. Even assuming this is for 8sec passes. What I wonder is what the hell they're using for driveline components???
Old 01-16-2011, 08:27 AM
  #35  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
It is insane alright. Even assuming this is for 8sec passes. What I wonder is what the hell they're using for driveline components???
Instead of that fancy computer-controlled multiplate clutch center differential, maybe just go with fixed longitudinal driveshafts, and front and rear spools, lock all four wheels in perfect sync? Not like it would cause problems when you live your life a quarter mile at a time
Old 01-16-2011, 08:35 AM
  #36  
Paulyy
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
 
Paulyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDS968
Instead of that fancy computer-controlled multiplate clutch center differential, maybe just go with fixed longitudinal driveshafts, and front and rear spools, lock all four wheels in perfect sync? Not like it would cause problems when you live your life a quarter mile at a time
Either way you will ne blowing smoke out of all 4 tires
Old 01-16-2011, 10:21 AM
  #37  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A.Wayne
Yes duke , 16V head, 10deg C ambient and e85 of course ...
Nahh it's been track tested at 30+ C and pump gas

IMHO no point in having low compression if you shoot for max 600 crank hp with a 3l 16v.
Old 01-16-2011, 10:30 AM
  #38  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

There is an interesting balance between static compression and boost levels. If you are building an engine that is primarily for the street you can raise the static compression, reduce the max boost and run with a turbo that is in the small side and you will get a very responsive engine. 9.5:1 with a GT30 turbo will do that nicely. On the other hand you could drop the compression ratio to 8.5:1 and run a GT35 turbo with higher boost – this can make more absolute torque but it will not be as responsive to throttle input. The lower CR / higher boost combo is a little more tolerant to detonation and it gives you the ability to tune around any problems with bad fuel.

So many choices…..
Old 01-16-2011, 11:10 AM
  #39  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

For all of you tuning experts, based on your experience...

How easy would it be to tune a bone-stock [EDIT: except for forged steel conrods] 16 valve 3.0L Variocam motor to handle about 15 psi at 112 octane (assuming the Variocam is reset to retard the intake cam whenever it's on boost, and ideal intercooling, maybe water-air)? Impossible? Reasonable? Leaving way too much on the table?

Last edited by JDS968; 01-16-2011 at 12:44 PM.
Old 01-16-2011, 11:27 AM
  #40  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I would be a little concerned with the stock rods. The compression ratio is on the high side but it could be done for a street car, but not for a track car!
Originally Posted by JDS968
For all of you tuning experts, based on your experience...

How easy would it be to tune a bone-stock 16 valve 3.0L Variocam motor to handle about 15 psi at 112 octane (assuming the Variocam is reset to retard the intake cam whenever it's on boost, and ideal intercooling, maybe water-air)? Impossible? Reasonable? Leaving way too much on the table?
Old 01-16-2011, 12:31 PM
  #41  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
I would be a little concerned with the stock rods. The compression ratio is on the high side but it could be done for a street car, but not for a track car!
yep, and there are some stock rods that are not up to the task of even the stock power. I pulled my pan on my 3.0l variocam (Not that I was ever thinking of using them anyway!) and they (con. rods) are the "recalled" thinner rods that have had problems. If, in the very least, change out the rods.
Old 01-16-2011, 12:42 PM
  #42  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
I would be a little concerned with the stock rods. The compression ratio is on the high side but it could be done for a street car, but not for a track car!
Sorry, I didn't really write that well. I meant "bone stock" in terms of stock pistons, bores aren't sleeved or anything, same combustion chambers and compression ratios.

Rods would be aftermarket forged steel.
Old 01-16-2011, 08:14 PM
  #43  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 95ONE
Completely dis-agree with the first quote, and the very first and last statement from the second. I heard this a whole bunch in the 90's using 80's knowledge. Proved wrong over and over on the extremely efficient 4valve heads when I was working on them in the 2000's. Those theories certainly work, it just leaves too much on the table. You just need cheap Honda motors to not worry about cost and keep turning up the boost till it blows.. after a few hundred successful motors, confidence grows. About 100 (Probably a lot more actually) From my shop alone. Many others were blowerd up in the process though. Usually cracked ring lands on the intake side from cheap pistons. Others were bent rods. tons of other small reasons besides detonation. A few were clearly that though. Oil in the PVC, or blowing through the turbo. 9.5 CR Does make for a nice room for error though on Porsche motors. And I wouldn't want to push the money Spent on these motors as much as the cheapy Hondas.
LMAO .. dats some funny stuff one ...

Originally Posted by Duke
Nahh it's been track tested at 30+ C and pump gas

IMHO no point in having low compression if you shoot for max 600 crank hp with a 3l 16v.
So you have a 600 bhp 951 race car doing track events running pump gas (93ron) with no issues ..

Define low CR..
Old 01-16-2011, 10:01 PM
  #44  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

er why after market rods ? why chose that particular upgrade over other stuff ?
when i do a search "rod failure" i get no 944 threads ..
Old 01-16-2011, 10:46 PM
  #45  
JDS968
Bannana Shine
Rennlist Member
 
JDS968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 21,055
Likes: 0
Received 334 Likes on 219 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gt37vgt
er why after market rods ? why chose that particular upgrade over other stuff ?
when i do a search "rod failure" i get no 944 threads ..
Early 968s have a conrod defect making them abnormally weak.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 16v vs 8v head turbo application - max static compression ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:20 PM.