bell housing failure
#17
bell housing failures
Attachment 480309
Attachment 480310
Has Anybody seen this happen ?is this a known weak point for the 951 or did I do something that could have caused this? any help would be welcome
Attachment 480310
Has Anybody seen this happen ?is this a known weak point for the 951 or did I do something that could have caused this? any help would be welcome
#18
This thread is of interest to me.
We have some saying rare and some saying not rare.
I have not seen it, and I have worked on 1 or 2 951's in my life.
Mr. Redondo - what are the circumstances please, surrounding these clutch housing failures?
We have some saying rare and some saying not rare.
I have not seen it, and I have worked on 1 or 2 951's in my life.
Mr. Redondo - what are the circumstances please, surrounding these clutch housing failures?
#19
clutch housing failures
I have seen these failures on 50 minutes races cars, but always on 968 cup cars, not in 951´s. The reference number for these parts are different, so I think it must be stronger the 951 clutch housing.
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor
The 944 and 968 bellhousings are very different –the 968 is a two piece bellhousing designed for quick clutch changes. I would not be surprised if the 968s that are having failures have swapped out the dual mass flywheel for a ‘regular’ flywheel.
#21
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Later bellhousings are made with thinner walls wich does contribute to weight saving, but are desintegrating because of it. Use 944 na bellhousing from arround 1986 and it will be a little heavyer but it wont fell apart like later ones do.
#22
Racer
Thread Starter
i was told that the NA bell housing is different from the 951 one ,the location of the starter is said to be different because of the larger starter gear.
Can anybody confirm this???
Can anybody confirm this???
#23
There is a 4R and a 2R - just going from memory.
But you want to make sure you don't use the wrong one - it will happy as hell to bolt on there perfectly, you only find out when its too late. And you will want to light yourself on fire and jump off a skyscraper.
#24
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I have both and they seem 100% same only na is visually part that is higher quality.
I'll check the starter hole tomorrow.
I'll check the starter hole tomorrow.
#25
#26
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I belive you. I'll still check however since I was shure they are the same till now.
If I understand this, the starter gear is bigger and flywheel is smaller on na?
If I understand this, the starter gear is bigger and flywheel is smaller on na?
#27
It places the starter VERY slighlty off-kilter, and makes a horrifying noise that you will never forget - because it comes at the same time as your realization that your are doing essentially the entire clutch job over again.
#28
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Ouch.
#29
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I dont see any difference. 951 part is visually lesser quality casting, half of kilogram lighter and has thinner walls. But thats it.
Can you tell me exactly what else is different?
[img][/img]
Can you tell me exactly what else is different?
[img][/img]
#30
I already told you.
Its very slight.
It comes from the different ring gears from NA to turbo.
The fact that you went through this trouble to question me makes me HOPE you don't believe me.
Its very slight.
It comes from the different ring gears from NA to turbo.
The fact that you went through this trouble to question me makes me HOPE you don't believe me.