Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

What to do next???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2009, 05:04 AM
  #46  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Even the 1000hp Nissans were on R spec and maybe pump fuel , although I saw a few flames coming out of some Nissans that day so I'm guessing some guys were fudging the rules.
No problem getting flames with pump fuel

Regarding what path to choose, do you feel the need to have such a uncompromised track car built with acid dip, seam welds etc.
A lighter car with a killer cage and the parts you already have would probably go a long way and would save a lot compared to the all out race chassis.
Old 04-01-2009, 07:59 AM
  #47  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I am still way undecided. Budget will strongly dictate my plans. eg looking at full custom cages at $8k vs bolt in for about $1k-$2k makes a huge difference. I'm not sure how much real world difference there is in those two options though? Might need to ask around on that one. It may be that we do it more along those lines you suggest Duke. Go budget initially with a stripped and caged car and just work away at technique as well for a while. That will be far more achievable in the short term. Then make some harder decisions later. Of course I could just do the opposite and build up something 1st rate from the get go. I just don't know yet.
Old 04-01-2009, 08:06 AM
  #48  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Oh I just got this new pic from a previous trackday. Just to show we're not going for Sunday drives. lol
Attached Images  

Last edited by 333pg333; 04-01-2009 at 08:22 AM.
Old 04-01-2009, 08:29 AM
  #49  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Great pic!! I would say that inner wheel lift confirms what you are saying about the speeds
It looks a tad flatter now with the Tarretts.
EDIT: just realised that the Tarretts were not installed on that pic. Looks flatter than some of the later pics though.
Old 04-01-2009, 01:57 PM
  #50  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Hoosiers are US DOT road legal tires just like the R888. They are faster though.
Old 04-01-2009, 05:21 PM
  #51  
anders44
Three Wheelin'
 
anders44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fat driver
if he was going the other way it wouldnt lift!
Old 04-01-2009, 05:21 PM
  #52  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Yes I know Joe, but in that particular event we we're allowed to use them. Hoosier, R1 etc 2 liner type tyres are not used much in this country. It's Rspec, or slick. In the Superlap we had a list of tyres to use from. I've always used the R888 and like them so that's what I went out on.

Duke, that pic was without the Tarrets and does look pretty flat I agree. Funnily some of the other pics you would have seen a few weeks ago were on the same day and that's when I had the shocks set too soft and was getting some body roll. With the Taretts in now and both front and rear set on hard, the car feels much flatter, but we are also thinking about going up in springs rates.
Speaking of which, is there a possible issue with just increasing the coils on the rears and leaving the stock T bars in? Or should they be both increased to retain some sort of balance?
Old 04-01-2009, 06:25 PM
  #53  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Speaking of which, is there a possible issue with just increasing the coils on the rears and leaving the stock T bars in? Or should they be both increased to retain some sort of balance?
No problem with just increasing the springs. They work together so they don't need to be "balanced". But I say just remove them. There's some weight to saved right there!
Old 04-01-2009, 09:13 PM
  #54  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anders44
fat driver
if he was going the other way it wouldnt lift!
Hey, I resemble that remark!
Old 04-01-2009, 09:38 PM
  #55  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
No problem with just increasing the springs. They work together so they don't need to be "balanced". But I say just remove them. There's some weight to saved right there!
I would look at doing this on the track car but not on the road/track car. It is said to place a lot of duress on the strut supports. We could reinforce them on the stripped out body but I don't want to do that on my Grey car.
Old 04-02-2009, 05:33 PM
  #56  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

IMHO that is very overrated. Theres a ridiculous amount of cars with removed torsion bars without reinforced strut mounts with no problems.
Old 04-02-2009, 06:09 PM
  #57  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
IMHO that is very overrated. Theres a ridiculous amount of cars with removed torsion bars without reinforced strut mounts with no problems.
+1 Of all the time on RL, I've seen exactly one reported failure, and it was on a road car.
Old 04-02-2009, 07:19 PM
  #58  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm late again to yet another thread, but........... Deja-vu

You're exactly where I was this past November. Safety became a huge concern. My speeds were excessive everywhere.

I didn't read any other post here though. So that considered. Here's my advice.

Here's what you need to do. Build the frame off the '86. Cage it, do suspension everything. Swap whatever parts you need from the current one over to the '86 when the race shell is done. (Dedicated is where you're headed anyway.)

Put nice stereo in current one. Flashy rims... You're done.
Old 04-02-2009, 08:30 PM
  #59  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Yeah that's pretty much where I'm headed....

Last edited by 333pg333; 04-02-2009 at 09:54 PM.
Old 04-02-2009, 09:13 PM
  #60  
95ONE
Race Car
 
95ONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are sooo many projects to choose from... Stay focused.


Quick Reply: What to do next???



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:01 PM.