Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Intercooler Options

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2009, 03:42 PM
  #31  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Broderick
I looked up a Bell intercooler at this size and it is around $500. The SFR setup which includes hardpipes looks like it is cost competitive. I am going to mod the end cap on my stock unit first, the SFR unit looks like the next step.

From the Bell site: Size (3.50 22.90 8.00) Airflow (1503 CFM) $495.00 P/N (A350229080)

Has anyone ever done a test to see if the vented panels do any good? I always wondered if it causes a vacuum since it is in a low pressure zone and would pull air out before it gets to the IC. I have read lots of talk but I havn't seem any test results. A couple of pieces of yarn taped to the front would tell alot. Maybe Chris can do some wind tunnels tests.

Found this graph from a post.
https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turb...ted+nose+panel

The numbers on the body relate to the numbers along the horizontal axis in the middle of the preasure chart.
I would say you're right Brian. That's why I want a vented hood like the 968 turbo. I think this will work just fine especially if you duct the outlet of the radiator etc through the vent.
Old 02-22-2009, 06:55 PM
  #32  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Vented nose panel works as long as ducted properly...

I went from a stock IC to a branded large IC, and had zero HP gain (at 365WHP).
Old 02-22-2009, 07:16 PM
  #33  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 533 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

NZ -- your mail box is full.
Old 02-22-2009, 08:31 PM
  #34  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Tom, I have had experiences with several vendor's IC. First, I think Patrick's guy did one hell of a job, that thing is a monster and I'm sure it flows incredible. And even the one from Aribop's old car is fantastic, kudos to both of these guys. Over the years on RL, there have been a lot of guys on here who made custom ones too. Anyway, here are my experiences and future plans. I had the LR Stage 5 and that custom header panel, and for me, the panel wasn't my taste but the IC flowed a lot. They have data on their site. I then had the LR Stage 2, and it worked great on my old 3.0L 8V too. For my next car, I am going with both the SFR Oil Cooler and Tim's IC. For my application, this set-up will work fine and it will fit very nice right off of the shelf. I happen to like the plug-n-play thing. Just my $.02

Old 02-22-2009, 09:14 PM
  #35  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

In a couple of weeks, I'll be testing my new intercooler. I will do a before and after, log intake temps and pressure to measure the efficiency and the pressure drop across. The testing will be done on the dyno the same day.
Unless you have the before and after dyno charts with the assocoated data, you cannot make a educated decision. When buying a intercooler, insist on getting this data.
BTW. I have no plan to sell intercoolers, this will be a one off for my personal car. I'll post details as soon as I have something to share.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 02-22-2009, 11:46 PM
  #36  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sorry Tom, I have like a 1000 messages in there. Just send to my email mate...

For some reason the stock IC is just well really good, its the very first thing 99% of the japanese market do and get good results... I got nothing!
Old 02-23-2009, 01:25 AM
  #37  
tone3721
Rennlist Member
 
tone3721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 3,203
Received 399 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Im runnin stock, how necesary do you guys think it is to upgrade?
Old 02-23-2009, 07:51 AM
  #38  
VOoDOoGTX
Drifting
 
VOoDOoGTX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: New Paltz, NY
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

VERY! everyone should go though the same amount of work and stress as i did...
Old 02-23-2009, 08:46 AM
  #39  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NZ951
Vented nose panel works as long as ducted properly...

I went from a stock IC to a branded large IC, and had zero HP gain (at 365WHP).
I am looking for some data, lots of people have made statements with no testing to back them up. For instance, I could say the reason you didn't gain any HP is BECAUSE of the nose panel vent.
Old 02-23-2009, 09:32 AM
  #40  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Broderick
I am looking for some data, lots of people have made statements with no testing to back them up. For instance, I could say the reason you didn't gain any HP is BECAUSE of the nose panel vent.
Brian, You might be on to something with the nose panel. I have a dual opening to feed cold air to my oil cooler. One of the opening is at the same level as the panel vent. I ended up closing it as it vacuumed the air that entered from the front opening a few inches below it.

Another VERY important variable to get the air flowing is the pressure behind the IC, Radiator or Oil Cooler. Creating a low pressure area behind the coolers help greatly.
Old 02-24-2009, 02:52 AM
  #41  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brian Broderick
I am looking for some data, lots of people have made statements with no testing to back them up. For instance, I could say the reason you didn't gain any HP is BECAUSE of the nose panel vent.
Why not get some data yourself? Nothing like proving a concept with your own car and tests...

https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turb...t=nz951+vented

page 2 is good.

Old 02-24-2009, 04:29 AM
  #42  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

I know that when I tested one of my 3L builds with stock i/c on the dyno we got significant heat soak that really diminished the results as each pull progressed. This was prior to my nose vents as well.
My feeling is that a good front mount WITH bigger pipes AND throttle body combined with through ventilation (ie nose venting and hood venting) will reap results.
I have no significant personal data to back that up, but I'm betting it wouldn't take too long to come up with something.
Old 02-24-2009, 08:05 AM
  #43  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I don't think a vented nose is in a low pressure area, it's to close to the front.
IMHO the 924 chart confirms this. Plus, I don't think Porsche would have put the 931 vents there if that would be the case

Here's my intercooler:
Old 02-24-2009, 08:06 AM
  #44  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The 968 turbo rs hood vent is a very good idea but not suitable for non stock type IC-pipes.
I want something like HansB has on his racer, a huge went.
Old 02-24-2009, 09:16 AM
  #45  
pete95zhn
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,275
Received 103 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Once again, here's the picture of 924 pressure differential chart from factory:



944 is not that different from it's top side, bumper backwards...
__________________
Pete

Power. Lots is good, more is better, too much is just right...

'87 951, RIP
'00 996 C2 L92U AQ / IXAA IXRB IX54 M96/7.xx G96/7.88 M030 M375 M376 M436 M476 M601 M983 ... + 991 GT3 brakes, 997 GT3 sway bars, fully monoball'd suspension, Bilstein Cup Car coilovers, do88 Big Pack ICs. 10 & 12 x 19" BBS CH-R wheels with 265/30 & 325 /30 -19 MPSC2s.





Quick Reply: Intercooler Options



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:08 PM.