Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

944 Aftermarket Control Arms

Old 01-26-2009, 01:58 PM
  #16  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The stock arms are perfectly adequate for street use provided they are maintained reasonably well [pins and bushings].

For track use, there are a few good alternatives:

Fabcar: Got 'em on my car. Easy to refurbish with parts available from OG Racing
Blaszak: Marcus makes a good product, well proven and easily rebuildable http://www.blaszakprecision.com/Control_Arms.html
Racers Edge: Karl's arms are another good choice http://www.racersedge-inc.com/racers...open&id=11.3.5
Charlie Arms are good IF you can get them, and get parts to keep them in good shape.

There are others, but these options all have a good record of use in race applications over many years.
Old 01-26-2009, 02:20 PM
  #17  
tone3721
Rennlist Member
 
tone3721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 3,199
Received 396 Likes on 285 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vt951
Here's a thread about another alternative which should be available in the coming months. He plans on offering them with and without camber/caster adjustment links, early and late offset. All will use the early 944 ball joints, for easy and low cost replacement.

https://rennlist.com/forums/924-931-...ht=aftermarket
Billeted would be nice. If this current rebuild doesnt last, why buy OEM arms, when these arms can be a had for a few extra bucks? I wont have it rebuilt again, it it doesnt hold. Last time I checked, I think OEM, was like 5-600 bucks / arm.
Old 01-26-2009, 05:40 PM
  #18  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,082
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tone3721
Billeted would be nice. If this current rebuild doesnt last, why buy OEM arms, when these arms can be a had for a few extra bucks? I wont have it rebuilt again, it it doesnt hold. Last time I checked, I think OEM, was like 5-600 bucks / arm.

I think he plans on selling them for somewhere in the neighnorhood of $600 - $700 for the pair, including new ball joints (more for the ones with adjustable links, though). This is well below other aftermarket alternatives (and OEM), except for the early steel arms, which won't hold a candle to these for strength or durability.
Old 01-26-2009, 06:05 PM
  #19  
tone3721
Rennlist Member
 
tone3721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 3,199
Received 396 Likes on 285 Posts
Default

The ball joints, not being adjustable is also a drawback. Also, billeted/cast, as opposed to welded, seems to make much more sense.
Old 01-27-2009, 10:19 AM
  #20  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Why would you need to adjust the ball joint? The early joints take lowering just fine and camberplates are ideal for simple camber adjustments.
Old 01-27-2009, 11:04 AM
  #21  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,082
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tone3721
The ball joints, not being adjustable is also a drawback. Also, billeted/cast, as opposed to welded, seems to make much more sense.
He plans on putting the adjustment on the inboard links rather than at the ball joint, to reduce bending and shear load on the threaded joints (roughly half the load inboard vs. at the ball joint).
Old 01-27-2009, 11:07 AM
  #22  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,082
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M758
The early joints take lowering just fine...
Good to know. So, do they have a wider range of motion than the late ball joints? I was designing these new control arms with a 7.5 degree bend in them to compensate for 2" lowering (to correct the ball joint angle). Mayble that's not necessary with the early ball joints then...
Old 01-27-2009, 11:25 AM
  #23  
M758
Race Director
 
M758's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 17,643
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

I have never seen and early joint fail.

You can test this also by simply bending the steel joint and alum arm one till it stops and compare the angles.
Old 01-27-2009, 12:20 PM
  #24  
Animus
Rennlist Member
 
Animus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: southeast Tracks
Posts: 534
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Blaszak: Marcus makes a good product, well proven and easily rebuildable http://www.blaszakprecision.com/Control_Arms.html
+1
Old 01-27-2009, 12:39 PM
  #25  
vt951
Rennlist Member
 
vt951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 2,082
Received 30 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by M758
I have never seen and early joint fail.

You can test this also by simply bending the steel joint and alum arm one till it stops and compare the angles.

Sure, I'll ask my brother in law to do that. He has my car, the late control arms, and the early ball joints, so I'm a bit handicapped at the moment.
Old 01-27-2009, 05:22 PM
  #26  
tone3721
Rennlist Member
 
tone3721's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: AZ/CA
Posts: 3,199
Received 396 Likes on 285 Posts
Default

Ahh. Not well versed with the early joints. Good to know.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 944 Aftermarket Control Arms



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:40 PM.