Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

The Cone Filter location

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-29-2008, 09:28 PM
  #1  
sebastian944
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
sebastian944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default The Cone Filter location

I've seen people put the cone filter in front of radiator or belts or near the left headlight. What is best? I've also heard that the stock porsche intake is way better than the cone filter or so my mechanic says.

Just asking, I have a autothority maf and the cone filter is at the headlight.
Old 12-29-2008, 09:44 PM
  #2  
CarbonRevo
Drifting
 
CarbonRevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I personally have mine behind the left headlight. Its a tight fit with the stock coolant tank. I plan to put it through the fender though, as my car started losing power when going flat out through 4th gear. It really starts sucking in hot air if your going from 0-100...and I don't like that.

The stock paper filter IS better at filtering then the K&N, regardless of what they claim. True, the K&N DOES make more power, but this is because of how less restrictive it is. It has less paper element, which is how it is this way. It relies on oil to catch dirt, where as a paper doesn't. But unless your running the stealth Vitesse MAF, your kind of forced to run a K&N.

I would NOT do behind the radiator though as that's a place where air thats just been heated up by the radiator flows to.
Old 12-31-2008, 12:37 PM
  #3  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As Cory said, the best is to route through the fender hole behind the headlight and wrap paper filter around the pipe or get a smaller cone style that will fit most of it through the hole at the fender.

This way you are pulling in mostly ambient air which will always be MUCH cooler than under hood air.

LESS cooler air makes more power than MORE hotter air.

I.e. you will make more power flowing 250cfm @ 50 degrees than 350cfm at 100 degrees, etc.
Old 12-31-2008, 12:41 PM
  #4  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turb...-intake-3.html
Old 12-31-2008, 12:50 PM
  #5  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So, anyone figured a way to get a pipe from the stock AFM to anywhere BUT behind the intercooler?
I've got a K&N cone on the AFM, but it drives me crazy that its sucking hot air from the IC. Can't see how its possible to run a large enough dia pipe from the stock AFM to the fender on either side.

Maybe the best compromise is to put the stock airbox back. Its a trade off between getting cooler charge air and taking the hit on slightly more restrictive flow. I'm stuck with PCA Stock class rules, so can't change the AFM or the JPipe, dammit!
Old 12-31-2008, 01:11 PM
  #6  
Darwantae951

 
Darwantae951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11,034
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by APKhaos
So, anyone figured a way to get a pipe from the stock AFM to anywhere BUT behind the intercooler?
I've got a K&N cone on the AFM, but it drives me crazy that its sucking hot air from the IC. Can't see how its possible to run a large enough dia pipe from the stock AFM to the fender on either side.

Maybe the best compromise is to put the stock airbox back. Its a trade off between getting cooler charge air and taking the hit on slightly more restrictive flow. I'm stuck with PCA Stock class rules, so can't change the AFM or the JPipe, dammit!
I'd go with your idea of re-using the original airbox. The change in intake air temp should cancel out the restrictions of the stock snorkel.
Old 12-31-2008, 01:39 PM
  #7  
CarbonRevo
Drifting
 
CarbonRevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You could maybe run a metal j pipe off the turbo and hook the AFM to that pipe, then run a pipe from the AFM through the fender hole and put a filter down in that area.

See what I'm saying?
Old 12-31-2008, 02:07 PM
  #8  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CarbonRevo
You could maybe run a metal j pipe off the turbo and hook the AFM to that pipe, then run a pipe from the AFM through the fender hole and put a filter down in that area.

See what I'm saying?
Great idea, but PCA Stock rules don't allow any change to the J Pipe, which means we're stuck with the location of the AFM.
Old 12-31-2008, 02:29 PM
  #9  
CarbonRevo
Drifting
 
CarbonRevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 2,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Could you rotate the stock j-tube 180 degrees so it and the AFM now sit behind the headlight? May have to run a SFR coolant tank, if allowed.
Old 12-31-2008, 03:06 PM
  #10  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
LESS cooler air makes more power than MORE hotter air.

I.e. you will make more power flowing 250cfm @ 50 degrees than 350cfm at 100 degrees, etc.

Well, that's not really true.
Air flow, actually, takes precedent over temps.
If, for an example, an engine can use 400 cfm at full power, any restriction in the inlet tract that causes a pressure drop, when the engine demands this cfm, will cause quite a drop in power. Colder air can recover that, but it has to be a lot colder; extremes you would rarely see.
Density is king. Flow losses cause pressure drops. Less pressure loses density quicker than colder temps can recover.
Of course, if you restrict your inlet a bit, but this flow threshold is still above what the engine needs, then no problem.
Old 12-31-2008, 07:08 PM
  #11  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've run both stock airbox and a filter in front of the belts, on exactly the same car, temps etc. The turbo spooled a bit over 500 rpm sooner with just a filter in front of the belts.
Old 12-31-2008, 09:25 PM
  #12  
APKhaos
Drifting
 
APKhaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: McLean, VA
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ehall
I've run both stock airbox and a filter in front of the belts, on exactly the same car, temps etc. The turbo spooled a bit over 500 rpm sooner with just a filter in front of the belts.
That's a great data point. I'd suspected that teh stock box and snorkel thingie looked like a ton of restriction, and that confirms it. I suspect its within the rules to mod the stock airbox by replacing the snorkel with a thumping big pipe into the fender area. That might help a bit.
Old 01-05-2009, 11:42 AM
  #13  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by APKhaos
Great idea, but PCA Stock rules don't allow any change to the J Pipe, which means we're stuck with the location of the AFM.
It seems like with the PCA rules you really are in a tight spot (no pun intended).

If the J boot can be in the same location, but turned in a different orientation, then you might be able to get something over to the headlight/fender hole.

If the J boot/AFM can not be moved or re oriented then the only other way to get outside air is the stock air box or hood modifications, which probably are not allowed.
Old 01-05-2009, 11:45 AM
  #14  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ehall
I've run both stock airbox and a filter in front of the belts, on exactly the same car, temps etc. The turbo spooled a bit over 500 rpm sooner with just a filter in front of the belts.
wow!

Then I guess the stock box/snorkel is REALLY restricting the flow.

I ran the cone in front of the belts with the stock afm and could certainly hear the turbo spooling a lot more.
Old 01-05-2009, 11:47 AM
  #15  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboTommy
Well, that's not really true.
Air flow, actually, takes precedent over temps.
If, for an example, an engine can use 400 cfm at full power, any restriction in the inlet tract that causes a pressure drop, when the engine demands this cfm, will cause quite a drop in power. Colder air can recover that, but it has to be a lot colder; extremes you would rarely see.
Density is king. Flow losses cause pressure drops. Less pressure loses density quicker than colder temps can recover.
Of course, if you restrict your inlet a bit, but this flow threshold is still above what the engine needs, then no problem.
The numbers I used were just an example, not taken from real data.

However, the concept was taken from real data. I read a dyno comparison some time ago of cold air intakes and the ones that were more accessible to outside air produced more HP than those that flowed more cfm but not directly from ambient.

There is a point where that is not true; 500cfm more will certainly make more power even if it is hotter air.


Quick Reply: The Cone Filter location



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:55 AM.