Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Cat v's No Cat...a/f's , egt's etc????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2008, 12:11 AM
  #16  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geneqco
On a more serious note... you'd expect some difference if comparing to a 19 year old used cat. A hew high flow metal cat with your HP, you would hope for not much difference... however, as you went up the HP scale, you'd expect that to change a bit.

As for all this picking on Nize... I think you should watch this and substitute Nize for Britney:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWSjUe0FyxQ

Old 01-08-2008, 12:13 AM
  #17  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Geneqco;4958351]On a more serious note... you'd expect some difference if comparing to a 19 year old used cat. A hew high flow metal cat with your HP, you would hope for not much difference... however, as you went up the HP scale, you'd expect that to change a bit.QUOTE]

I agree. Also if your not tuning the timing to the limit, you will be fine. Just keep an eye on the a/f's.
Old 01-08-2008, 12:46 PM
  #18  
krystar
Drifting
 
krystar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Darien, IL
Posts: 3,240
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

removal of the cat should yield a leaner mixture provided you keep the same fuel maps. the cat is a gas flow restriction. removing that restriction would allow more exhaust gas flow, leading to more scavenging and more air intake mixture drawn in, but with the same amount of fuel injected.

more air + same fuel = leaner



Quick Reply: Cat v's No Cat...a/f's , egt's etc????



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:04 AM.