Liquid to liquid cooling
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Liquid to liquid cooling
Anyone ever thought to cool something in the engine with fuel? Say maybe run the fuel and the coolant next to each other in a small radiator? I know they do that in some turbine engines (i.e. the GE 700 and 701C I know for a fact have a liquid to liquid cooler that cools oil and heats/atomizes fuel before it enters the combustion section)
I know it's probably not realistic to do this in a 951; but I'm just wondering what people think about the idea.
They way I was taught, such a system is twofold. Not only does it cool whatever fluid you need cooled, but it also heats up your fuel and atomizes it which, apparently, makes the combustion process more efficient.
I know it's probably not realistic to do this in a 951; but I'm just wondering what people think about the idea.
They way I was taught, such a system is twofold. Not only does it cool whatever fluid you need cooled, but it also heats up your fuel and atomizes it which, apparently, makes the combustion process more efficient.
#3
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was always of the impression that the fuel had to be cooler to make HP as the fuel becomes vapour as it gets hotter
Diesel may be different, but thats not my bag!
Diesel may be different, but thats not my bag!
#5
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#7
Drifting
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Elk Gove, CA
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone ever thought to cool something in the engine with fuel? Say maybe run the fuel and the coolant next to each other in a small radiator? I know they do that in some turbine engines (i.e. the GE 700 and 701C I know for a fact have a liquid to liquid cooler that cools oil and heats/atomizes fuel before it enters the combustion section)
I know it's probably not realistic to do this in a 951; but I'm just wondering what people think about the idea.
They way I was taught, such a system is twofold. Not only does it cool whatever fluid you need cooled, but it also heats up your fuel and atomizes it which, apparently, makes the combustion process more efficient.
I know it's probably not realistic to do this in a 951; but I'm just wondering what people think about the idea.
They way I was taught, such a system is twofold. Not only does it cool whatever fluid you need cooled, but it also heats up your fuel and atomizes it which, apparently, makes the combustion process more efficient.
links from: http://www.pro-touring.com/forum/sho...er+tour+cooler
Trending Topics
#8
On turbine engines using aviation kerosene it does work. There were experimental engines developed that heated gas to vapor before combustion with good results on fuel mileage. It is a tad bit dangerous with gas vs kerosene.
I think this would fit in a 951 hatch with a little work.
I think this would fit in a 951 hatch with a little work.
Last edited by Bri Bro; 01-02-2008 at 09:39 PM.
#9
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess the idea is a little crazy. What's the biggest difference? I'm thinking that it has something to do with the different stages of a piston-driven engine vs. the continuous burn of a turbine.
On the turbine, the fuel goes through the oil cooler/fuel heater just before it hits the pump which sends the fuel to the nozzles. So the gas isn't vaporized for very long. And it's a continuous stream of fuel.
I guess there are probably also issues of vaporized fuel seeping through the valves and into the pistons during the wrong stage? Or could it be more dangerous due to premature ignition of the heated fuel?
You could probably fit a turbine under the hood. It's not going to have the same output as a big GE turbine. Plus you'd better have a lot of money to spend on fuel!
On the turbine, the fuel goes through the oil cooler/fuel heater just before it hits the pump which sends the fuel to the nozzles. So the gas isn't vaporized for very long. And it's a continuous stream of fuel.
I guess there are probably also issues of vaporized fuel seeping through the valves and into the pistons during the wrong stage? Or could it be more dangerous due to premature ignition of the heated fuel?
You could probably fit a turbine under the hood. It's not going to have the same output as a big GE turbine. Plus you'd better have a lot of money to spend on fuel!
#10
Three Wheelin'
FWIW 996s/997s/Boxsters use the air conditioning system to help cool the fuel. I know that is not exactly the same as what the original poster was saying, but of course the A/C has to be running (and working properly) for the cooling effect to work. My 951 had some hot start/vapor lock issues at the track a few weeks ago, as I know others have had, and this could be why Porsche has installed this from the factory in newer cars. But, you generally don't run your A/C at the track anyway, and I'm not sure what kind of HP gains we're talking here . . . .
#13
Drifting
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Elk Gove, CA
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I guess the idea is a little crazy. What's the biggest difference? I'm thinking that it has something to do with the different stages of a piston-driven engine vs. the continuous burn of a turbine.
On the turbine, the fuel goes through the oil cooler/fuel heater just before it hits the pump which sends the fuel to the nozzles. So the gas isn't vaporized for very long. And it's a continuous stream of fuel.
I guess there are probably also issues of vaporized fuel seeping through the valves and into the pistons during the wrong stage? Or could it be more dangerous due to premature ignition of the heated fuel?
You could probably fit a turbine under the hood. It's not going to have the same output as a big GE turbine. Plus you'd better have a lot of money to spend on fuel!
On the turbine, the fuel goes through the oil cooler/fuel heater just before it hits the pump which sends the fuel to the nozzles. So the gas isn't vaporized for very long. And it's a continuous stream of fuel.
I guess there are probably also issues of vaporized fuel seeping through the valves and into the pistons during the wrong stage? Or could it be more dangerous due to premature ignition of the heated fuel?
You could probably fit a turbine under the hood. It's not going to have the same output as a big GE turbine. Plus you'd better have a lot of money to spend on fuel!
#15
Drifting
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Elk Gove, CA
Posts: 3,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When you're hundreds of miles away from home or anything resembling a shop, where there is however a home depot and quickie mart, its a pretty ingenuitve cure to keep a car on the road.