Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

turbocharger review - pauer tuning

Old 05-16-2007, 12:53 AM
  #46  
SoloRacer
Drifting
 
SoloRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nize
vic will disclose full specs when you're ready to buy. john will not. that's the difference i ran into.

also, vic will custom-match a turbo for your goals. want a 50trim with a #6, 8, or 10 hotside, vic will do it for $1500. want a 60trim? he'll do that too. john has a mystery 'stage2' with no alternate configurations for $2200.

big difference there also.
How does he determine if you are ready to buy? Does he make you give a none refundable deposit? If you are keen for the specs wouldn't you want to know before you buy? Do you have to sign a non disclosure agreement? It doesn't make sense to me to say "I like knowing the specs but I won't get the real important ones until after I buy" It's sort of like saying "GM will build me a car but won't tell me the specs until after I gave them my deposit". A better approach would be "Here is a Corvette - it does 0-60 in 5 seconds and gets 35 mpg." At least then you are basing it on the results - not the specifications. I wouldn't care if the car had a V8 or a supercharged V6. It's the performance that matters. The only real point in knowing all the specifications would be so that you can purchase a turbo from another vendor for less money and that is why you won't tell us what Vic is doing. Again I have no problem with that as it is his livelyhood. I just find it a bit hypocritical to be demanding someone tell you all the specs of one product and then defend not telling all the specs of another. Just my point of view I guess.

As for John's different configurations I guess you could say they are Stage 2, 3, 4 & 5 which is basically what you are saying you can do with Pauer by changing the wheel trims and housing sizes. Perhaps the Pauer model allows for larger variations in performance however I would suspect that if he was selling a tuned bolt-on package he would have to stay with certain known configurations to keep everything safe and predictable. Not everyone is going to have the ability or system in place (EMS) to actively tune an engine.

Again I'm not trying to be insulting. I'm just trying to make sure we are looking at things fairly. I really do look forward to seeing your results. Are you planning to make the maps from your Wolf available for other guys here who might want to follow in your footsteps?
Old 05-16-2007, 12:55 AM
  #47  
TRP951
Rennlist Member
 
TRP951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sh944
You've been on Rennlist long enough, I am pretty convinced you are committed (as is Nize).

The problem with MAP is that it responds to quickly for the Motronics units. MAF sends a compatible signal, MAP doesn't. The best you can do with MAP is try to fool the DME, MAF talks the same language.

The real glory with a 951 is going to be found in a standalone system, I'm convinced of that. Still, with a Kevin Gross built tranny (complete with an S2 r&p) and Johns turbo equipment, there aren't a lot of cars that will hang with me.

Regards,

And I beleive if you are talking about Tedwrights car that you bought from him that thing had quite a bit of power
Old 05-16-2007, 01:02 AM
  #48  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 172 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Nope. I didn't buy Ted's car. You must be thinking of someone else.

Regards,
Old 05-16-2007, 01:13 AM
  #49  
A.Wayne
Formula One Spin Doctor
Rennlist Member
 
A.Wayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: RPM Central
Posts: 20,448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Power numbers please . this would be a better comparision tool than PSI ,
could you post you dyno sheet at 23 PSI ....
Old 05-16-2007, 01:18 AM
  #50  
SoloRacer
Drifting
 
SoloRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I just had an interesting thought. Does anyone ever publish the specs on superchargers? I just bought a 93 NSX with a Comptech supercharger. Now I know that the supercharger is a Whipple blower and I know that it has the smaller (low boost) pulley but I can't say that I have ever heard of anyone saying what the exact specifications are for the internals of the blower. Is this because there are no specifications (lack of variety that you have in turbo selection) or is this because in the supercharger world nobody cares and all they want to know is how it performs? Just wondering.
Old 05-16-2007, 01:20 AM
  #51  
SoloRacer
Drifting
 
SoloRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A.Wayne
Power numbers please . this would be a better comparision tool than PSI ,
could you post you dyno sheet at 23 PSI ....
I would also like to know the conditions involved in getting the dyno sheet numbers (pump gas, exhaust, head work, etc.)
Old 05-16-2007, 01:24 AM
  #52  
User 41221
Banned
 
User 41221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,017
Received 172 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

I'm running a widefire with a stock shortblock on pump gas, so no 23psi runs for me, but I will give you an honest 17 psi run in the next several days, as long as I get a chance to break away from my day job.

Regards,
Old 05-16-2007, 03:12 AM
  #53  
nize
Banned
Thread Starter
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sh944
Tell you what, I'll post a dyno chart, if that doesn't convince you its the real deal, then I can't help you and I don't really care. Fair enough?

Oh, and I can sleep plenty well at night, thank you.

Regards,
i'd be interested in a before/after dyno with the same tune, the only difference being the turbo swap. can you provide that? that is the only true and fair turbo comparison.

nevertheless, i'm still curious to see your dyno. i don't understand why, when we're all 951 owners, enthusiasts, and customers, we have to be so secretive towards each other. where's the brotherhood? we should be helping each other, not bickering about magical mystery products.
Old 05-16-2007, 03:14 AM
  #54  
nize
Banned
Thread Starter
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Sorry if I missed it, but did you have all the mod's on while you still had the KKK? If that's the case then isn't it a direct comparison between the turbos?
yes. i'll point out once again that the only difference in my turbo comparison is the turbo alone. nothing else changes.
Old 05-16-2007, 03:31 AM
  #55  
nize
Banned
Thread Starter
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
How does he determine if you are ready to buy? Does he make you give a none refundable deposit? If you are keen for the specs wouldn't you want to know before you buy? Do you have to sign a non disclosure agreement? It doesn't make sense to me to say "I like knowing the specs but I won't get the real important ones until after I buy" It's sort of like saying "GM will build me a car but won't tell me the specs until after I gave them my deposit". A better approach would be "Here is a Corvette - it does 0-60 in 5 seconds and gets 35 mpg." At least then you are basing it on the results - not the specifications. I wouldn't care if the car had a V8 or a supercharged V6. It's the performance that matters. The only real point in knowing all the specifications would be so that you can purchase a turbo from another vendor for less money and that is why you won't tell us what Vic is doing. Again I have no problem with that as it is his livelyhood. I just find it a bit hypocritical to be demanding someone tell you all the specs of one product and then defend not telling all the specs of another. Just my point of view I guess.
i guess the 'ready to buy' is gut feeling. hell i was ready to buy a vitesse turbo if i had just known the specs. the most important aspect of a turbo upgrade for me was that i wanted to make sure i got a dual ball bearing turbo.

as for the specs, i've already told you and everybody else the specs that matter the most. why don't you be fair and tell us the specs of a vitesse stage2? or do you not even know what the specs are of the turbo you have? do you know how many cylinders and displacement your motor is? maybe you don't care, but this type of information is critical to tuners.

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
As for John's different configurations I guess you could say they are Stage 2, 3, 4 & 5 which is basically what you are saying you can do with Pauer by changing the wheel trims and housing sizes. Perhaps the Pauer model allows for larger variations in performance
what is a stage2? what is a stage3, 4, &5 ? without specifications you may as well call them voodoo2, pixiedust3, and blackmagic4.

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
however I would suspect that if he was selling a tuned bolt-on package he would have to stay with certain known configurations to keep everything safe and predictable. Not everyone is going to have the ability or system in place (EMS) to actively tune an engine.
again, i'm not comparing tunes. i'm only comparing turbos.

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
Again I'm not trying to be insulting. I'm just trying to make sure we are looking at things fairly. I really do look forward to seeing your results.
how much more 'fairly' can you look at something other than two turbos on the same car with identical mods and tunes?

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
Are you planning to make the maps from your Wolf available for other guys here who might want to follow in your footsteps?
of course. hell, i'll even help them fine-tune their wolf3d systems and tell them the exact specs of my turbo. will you?
Old 05-16-2007, 03:32 AM
  #56  
nize
Banned
Thread Starter
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
I just had an interesting thought. Does anyone ever publish the specs on superchargers? I just bought a 93 NSX with a Comptech supercharger. Now I know that the supercharger is a Whipple blower and I know that it has the smaller (low boost) pulley but I can't say that I have ever heard of anyone saying what the exact specifications are for the internals of the blower. Is this because there are no specifications (lack of variety that you have in turbo selection) or is this because in the supercharger world nobody cares and all they want to know is how it performs? Just wondering.
who knows? who cares? we're not comparing superchargers here. we're comparing turbos.
Old 05-16-2007, 03:33 AM
  #57  
nize
Banned
Thread Starter
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
I would also like to know the conditions involved in getting the dyno sheet numbers (pump gas, exhaust, head work, etc.)
do you have such a dyno sheet for your car(s)? where is it?
Old 05-16-2007, 03:34 AM
  #58  
nize
Banned
Thread Starter
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A.Wayne
Power numbers please . this would be a better comparision tool than PSI ,
could you post you dyno sheet at 23 PSI ....
i would if i had the mods in place to support 23psi. unfortunately, i dont.
Old 05-16-2007, 03:36 AM
  #59  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nize
yes. i'll point out once again that the only difference in my turbo comparison is the turbo alone. nothing else changes.
Ok then based on this we can at least see where the turbo itself will make the differences. Which is about the most that can be claimed from this post. I'm not denigrating or belittling anyone and I think ultimately it's a good thread.

p.s. Changing to the S2 cw&p is a great modification provided you don't need to travel at 275+kmh. It just gives so much better response and probably lets you run a larger turbo while retaining good response all through the rev range.
Old 05-16-2007, 03:41 AM
  #60  
KuHL 951
Hey Man
Rennlist Member

 
KuHL 951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nor Cal, Seal Rock, OR
Posts: 16,509
Received 177 Likes on 105 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SoloRacer
How does he determine if you are ready to buy? Does he make you give a none refundable deposit? If you are keen for the specs wouldn't you want to know before you buy? Do you have to sign a non disclosure agreement? ...
I'm not sure what the statement about 'ready to buy' is? I've been talking to Vic for over 3 months knowing he was coming out with this line of turbos. Never once did he try to hide any specifics about the new Garrett units or what wheels, center sections, and components that go into them...at least with me. We discussed what I was looking for in performance, my intended use, my budget, future chip options, and he answered all my questions long before I bought the new Garrett. Vic has been nothing but honest and willing to talk shop and I respect that. I could have bought a standard journal Turbonetics but waited for the Garrett project to fully develop. I didn't have to sign any code of secrecy, learn a secret handshake, place a deposit, or swear allegiance to his products only. I bought the same Garrett unit as Nize a few weeks ago because I felt it will deliver solid performance on the 2.5L and he will back up any problems that might arise. Last year I bought my Tial 38 w/ SS adapter plates and safety wired hardware because his product cost less and offered more than others were at the time. Sure I know the turbo specs, am I going to disassemble it and measure everything and post it? Hell no. I feel that Vic has done a great job in educating me on the pros and cons of the many options I had. He never once badmouthed any other vendor in the many hours I've talked with him.

I just can't see why many of you seem somewhat concerned about someone trying an alternate source for turbos. Vitesse, Lindsey, SFR; they are all good companies that support the 951. Pauer Tuning to me is no different, another good company, a smaller product line maybe, but with a few well thought out products none the less.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: turbocharger review - pauer tuning



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:06 PM.