Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Standalone EMS...?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2007, 05:43 PM
  #31  
thingo
Rennlist Member
 
thingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschefile
Nope. Technically a good aftermarket EMS is only capable of making more power and being more efficient as most good, modern EMS's have superior hardware, more advanced features, larger number of load sites to more finely tune at smaller rpm intervals etc.
I knew that Track conditions is the most extreme situation I am envisaging
Old 02-20-2007, 06:11 PM
  #32  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I still say the proper knock detection system should be connected to a 5th spark plug located in the driver’s seat firmly placed near the sub strap.

As I have mentioned before – the most important thing to get with your standalone is support. Most of the current stand alones have a lot of tuning power – and a lot of mistuning power!
Originally Posted by MPD47
Hell I bet you could set it to spray meth on one of the GPO's if it detected a certain knock count or higher.
Crystal or liquid?
Old 02-20-2007, 06:23 PM
  #33  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porschefile
Nope. Technically a good aftermarket EMS is only capable of making more power and being more efficient as most good, modern EMS's have superior hardware, more advanced features, larger number of load sites to more finely tune at smaller rpm intervals etc
My way of thinking is a little different (and it sounds weird coming from a stand alone guy).
The EMS doesn’t make any power. Zip, none, nada.
What it does do - It allows the rest of the parts to create more power.
One of the typical questions I get is “How much more power will the Tec3 make”….um…none. But it will allow you to maximize the potential of all the other parts of your system. It will allow you to make your own decision on safety margin vs. performance.
To get the most out of you set up you have to tune the ‘system’ – this includes hardware like turbos, intercoolers, intake and exhaust manifolds and it also includes environmental issues – intake temps, fuel quality, coolant temps and system faults (like oil consumption lowering the octane).
Old 02-20-2007, 08:25 PM
  #34  
Porschefile
Three Wheelin'
 
Porschefile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
I still say the proper knock detection system should be connected to a 5th spark plug located in the driver’s seat firmly placed near the sub strap.
Hehe.



As I have mentioned before – the most important thing to get with your standalone is support. Most of the current stand alones have a lot of tuning power – and a lot of mistuning power!

Crystal or liquid?
Isn't that the darn truth! I completely agree with your point of view.
Old 02-21-2007, 01:41 PM
  #35  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MPD47
The great thing about my Tec3R setup is the new wiring harness and the technical support. I have recieved the absolute best support from Chris White for my Tec3R and John @ Vitesse for my old turbo. These guys are second to none.
Big bump to this post Mike!

Old 02-21-2007, 01:58 PM
  #36  
SoloRacer
Drifting
 
SoloRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,305
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

I know Milledge and KMR both use Motec systems as do many other Porsche tuners. Having said that, the most important thing would be to choose a system based upon the support you will get for it. A well tuned TEC3 will be much better than a poorly installed and tuned Motec just as a well tune Motec will be much better than a poorly installed and tuned TEC3.

Even if you are going it alone you are still going to need assistance to get the best out of whatever unit you have. What system to get is going to depend largely on your level of experience.
Old 02-21-2007, 04:32 PM
  #37  
dave@fnf
1st Gear
 
dave@fnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We're currently installing VEMS standalone on a Customers 951 thats getting a Chevy LS2 crate motor swap and a Paxton Supercharger but that obviously wouldnt work on the Factory motronic ECU either.
Old 03-19-2007, 04:38 AM
  #38  
nize
Banned
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you can't beat plug-and-play;
https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turbo-and-turbo-s-forum/233816-wolf-3d-ems.html
Old 03-19-2007, 10:50 AM
  #39  
Raceboy
Three Wheelin'
 
Raceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Estonia
Posts: 1,631
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nize
Plug'n'play justifies itself only on relatively new vehicles. Plugging ECU to the 20year old harness like on 951 is asking for trouble. Bad ground can fry aftermarket ECU not to mention wasting the time chasing poor connections.
Old 03-19-2007, 02:55 PM
  #40  
nize
Banned
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think that's a poor excuse made by people who don't have plug-and-play. there was nothing wrong with the harness/wiring on all three of my last 951's, and every single 951 i've ever seen around here has zero issues with the stock wiring. one should not be forced to re-wire their entire car (and not be able to return to stock) just because they want to go to a standalone ecu.
Old 03-19-2007, 03:14 PM
  #41  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nize
i think that's a poor excuse made by people who don't have plug-and-play. there was nothing wrong with the harness/wiring on all three of my last 951's, and every single 951 i've ever seen around here has zero issues with the stock wiring. one should not be forced to re-wire their entire car (and not be able to return to stock) just because they want to go to a standalone ecu.
Plug and play is not rocket science. Its just a wiring issue. The Tec3 could run as a plug and play if an adapter was configured to create the physical attachment.
Of course you would lose the ability to have semi-sequential or full sequential injection, the superior wasted spark ignition system, modern sensors and a new harness.
In fact I looked at doing a plug and play – it would be a lot easier for me since I wouldn’t have to make up the harness…but you lose too much in the translation.

That begin said – I don’t know why this type of discussion always gets a little testy. There are merits for each method. Jus t take your pick and don’t feel the need to belittle the other systems.
Old 03-19-2007, 03:45 PM
  #42  
nize
Banned
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
modern sensors and a new harness.
i think those should be options, not requirements. if it's 'just a wiring issue', why not do it and at least offer it as an option for those who don't want to re-wire their car?
Old 03-19-2007, 04:16 PM
  #43  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nize
i think those should be options, not requirements. if it's 'just a wiring issue', why not do it and at least offer it as an option for those who don't want to re-wire their car?
OK, if you can find anybody that wants to delete some of what I feel are fairly important features (new harness, coil pack, sensors) I will accommodate them and make it a plug and play setup for the same price….
Old 03-20-2007, 12:51 AM
  #44  
DanG
Three Wheelin'
 
DanG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Posts: 1,594
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
That begin said – I don’t know why this type of discussion always gets a little testy. There are merits for each method. Just take your pick and don’t feel the need to belittle the other systems.
Come on Chris, that one's obvious. Its because the only system that's the best is the one the poster has! Or has read lots of threads about on the intarweb.

Following that logic of course, the ONLY answer in standalones starts with Mega and ends with 'squirt! Its the ugly red-headed stepchild of the industry, which I'd like to blame primarily on its uber-low entry fee, and predictably uber-low experience level of the cheapskates and forum geeks that use it. You don't see too many of them on $50k+ race cars, although I believe they are just as up to the task. They certainly measure up on paper. I'll be running it on my $500 24hrs of LeMons volvo, as well as my $4k engine'd 951.

While the system itself has EXCELLENT support, there are only a small handful of guys using it on our cars. I'm cool with that, but not many other people are.
Old 03-20-2007, 01:04 AM
  #45  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

DanG,
Does MS have knock sensor ability?


Rogue


Quick Reply: Standalone EMS...?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:32 PM.