Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums

Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums (https://rennlist.com/forums/)
-   944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum (https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turbo-and-turbo-s-forum-72/)
-   -   Lifting Head (https://rennlist.com/forums/944-turbo-and-turbo-s-forum/200565-lifting-head.html)

Tom M'Guinn 04-28-2005 02:34 AM

Lifting Head
 
My head seems to be lifting under high (20+ psi) boost. (Coolant pressurizes and pukes up, no mixing, no wet plugs.) New WFHG. Raceware studs torqued and retorqued to spec. Fairly fresh head.

Can I hear from other Raceware stud users -- are you able to run 20+ (on high octane, w/ good a/f) without the head lifting?

Has anyone confirmed a cylinder sinking or shifting? If so, how?

Chris White 04-28-2005 12:32 PM

I don’t think there would be lift - the Raceware’s won’t stretch. Did you check the flatness of the block and head? Raceware studs are less forgiving of warps and such.

Chris White

eclou 04-28-2005 12:41 PM

Is the head O-ringed?

mark944turbo 04-28-2005 01:49 PM

"I don’t think there would be lift - the Raceware’s won’t stretch. Did you check the flatness of the block and head? Raceware studs are less forgiving of warps and such."

Could you elaborate Chris? I dont see how the "forgivingness" would vary.

mark944turbo 04-28-2005 01:50 PM

And, another thing to check, a blockage in the cooling system causing that high pressure. Check and make sure it is cylinder pressure dependant and not on rpm.

Chris White 04-28-2005 03:50 PM

The stock head studs are a stretch type fastener – they have the ability to maintain clamping force over a variety of conditions – such as dimensional changes due to expansion and head ‘movement’. They will continue to provide claming force even if the head lifts a little or the head/block changes shape.
The aftermarket studs (reaceware / ARP) stud do not stretch and can only exert the proper clamping force at exactly the height they were installed. If there is any movement the clamping force can change dramatically.
Imagine a warped head that is torqued to spec – as the head heats and cools the warp may change thus changing the clamping force, a stretch fastener will compensate somewhat bit a non-stretch fastener may loose all clamping force.

All that begin said there is one other possibility – did you check all the hose clamps on the cooling system? If one is just slightly loose it may leak coolant only under high coolant pressure (like the added head of high boost). Get a pressure tester to see if the coolant system will hold over 15psi.

Chris White

Bill 04-28-2005 05:14 PM

Tom,

Take it to a shop that can check the coolant for exhaust gasses. If the head is lifting or the head gasket is failing, it should have exhaust gasses present in the coolant. If none are present, I would look to cooling system issues.

Remember the 944 cooling system is designed to operate at 7 lbs of pressure. This reduces the boiling point (or puking as you say) of the coolant. If your cooling system will not hold pressure, it will "puke" sooner.

And this not from pressure, but the lack thereof.

Mike S 04-28-2005 05:19 PM

And Tom....when you get this car sorted out.....I wanna ride when you're running 20+psi. Yahoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Bill 04-28-2005 05:29 PM

Tom,

If the water pump bearing seal fails (known 944 maintence item) your system will not pressurize. Same if the radiator tank seals fail. I have a Stant pressure tester. If you are ever in my neighborhood, we can check your system.

Mike,

I am running 20psi..........

Chris White 04-28-2005 06:20 PM

7 lbs radiator cap? Not what I use…

macnewma 04-28-2005 07:33 PM

Chris, what exactly do you use?

theedge 04-28-2005 07:38 PM


Originally Posted by macnewma
Chris, what exactly do you use?

Stock calls for IIRC, a 16PSI cap. 1.1 Bar I believe.

Jason_86_951 04-28-2005 09:53 PM

I had this same puking after WOT runs if I didn't let it cool WAY down before shuting down. The combination of some pinhole leaks in the overflow tank and a bad tank cap that didn't quite hold pressure is what caused mine. I haven't had it happen since I replaced those two items.
Cheers,
Jason

dand86951 04-28-2005 10:01 PM


Originally Posted by macnewma
Chris, what exactly do you use?

The stock radiator cap is 1.5 bar which is21.75 psi. This is way higher than most engines use.

Tom M'Guinn 04-28-2005 10:44 PM

Thanks for all your thoughts. To respond:

The head was machined recently so I assumed it was flat, but I did not check it or the deck. I may be doing so shortly I guess.

No o-ringing on my head or deck.

It is always possible to be fooled, but I am fairly sure combustion pressure is getting into the water jackets -- I routed the over flow tube up to the windshield, and could see it blow coolant like a nitrous purge line when I got on the boost or shortly thereafter. When I turn the boost down, less comes out.

I am using a 1.5 bar cap (stock), and tried a back-up cap, just in case, without success.

I have a pressure tester. It holds 15psi. That, and the fact that I don't loose coolant if I stay off the boost, makes me think it takes the higher combustion pressure to breach the HG. (Or, I have a crack somewhere, or a cylinder is moving.)

I may try retorquing the head without pulling it off, to a higher torque. If that does not work, then I guess I'll pull the head and check for flatness. If something is slightly warped, would stock head studs help?

Tom M'Guinn 04-28-2005 10:47 PM


Originally Posted by Mike S
And Tom....when you get this car sorted out.....I wanna ride when you're running 20+psi. Yahoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

It's the stuff dreams are made of. The old HR turbo makes a great torque curve too -- so it really pulls hard from 3k or so. At 22psi, the steering gets very light. :)

eclou 04-28-2005 11:23 PM

Mine did the same thing and I ran it 3 track events until the WFHG just blew entirely. So far, adding the O-ringing has prevented a recurrence at 18psi.

Tom M'Guinn 04-29-2005 01:07 AM

Update: I pulled the intake off tonight, and checked the top row of nuts. I put a click and beam style torque wrench on the nuts and pulled -- the nuts did not budge at 65 ft lbs with either wrench. I loosened a few just a tad and retightened, and they did not move beyond where they were. I'll pull the cam tower this weekend. If the wet nuts don't budge either, I am torn between (a) tightening them up to 80 or 90 ft lbs, or (b) pulling the head, checking for flatness and, if flat, trying a set of factory studs. I'll be assembling and installing a 3L over the next few months (pistons ariving next week), so if the deck is not flat and I need to pull the motor, I am not likely to reinstall it -- which has me leaning toward giving higher torque a try.

I also snapped off the blue radiator plug while draining the coolant. Anyone know if Parts Heaven has them on the shelf? If not, I may need to summons the mighty power of Rennlist to score a plug over the weekend. :)

Chris White 04-29-2005 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by macnewma
Chris, what exactly do you use?

1.5 bar cap. Any lower and I have 'spitting' problems at tha reack!

Chris White

Mike S 04-29-2005 12:29 PM

Tom, since you have the intake off it may be worth it to take a torque wrench the the head nuts that are exposed (the ones not buried under the cam tower). Just check to see if they are still at the same torque.

Tom M'Guinn 04-29-2005 12:32 PM


Originally Posted by Mike S
Tom, since you have the intake off it may be worth it to take a torque wrench the the head nuts that are exposed (the ones not buried under the cam tower). Just check to see if they are still at the same torque.

I tried that, and [edit] none of them budged at 65 ft. lbs. (Or 70 ft. lbs. for that matter)

Anyone know where I can get a precision straight edge locally?

Bill 04-29-2005 12:47 PM

Ok, 1.5 bar. I stand corrected. Thanks Chris.

Tom M'Guinn 04-30-2005 04:31 PM

I know you're all on the edge of your seats, so here's my update. I pulled the cam tower this morning. Although the nuts under the cam tower all clicked-off with the wrench set at spec, when I backed them off a tiny bit (say 5 degrees) and re-torqued, they clearly turned further tight (say 15-20 degrees more) in order to get back to spec. I'm hoping I just didn't wait long enough before re-torquing last time, and the HG compressed a bit more. I'm going to tighten them a bit beyond 65 ft lbs too. Here's to hoping!


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:23 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands