Some Revolutionary Thoughts on Offset Crank Grinding
#31
Sure, you should be precise at any size, but when you're talking about throwing that much metal around, you run a much bigger chance of some small problems causing a bigger one. Especially given the balance issues with a huge 4 banger.
The more you deviate from the factory parts and design, the more important it is to know what you are doing, and be very careful with how you are engineering the motor, I think that's a pretty safe statement.
The more you deviate from the factory parts and design, the more important it is to know what you are doing, and be very careful with how you are engineering the motor, I think that's a pretty safe statement.
#32
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gulf Shores, Alabama
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hope you're able to call it 'frankenstein', and not 'grenade'
#33
Come on now, I'm not hoping that you have problems. I fully expect you to have them, but I would be very happy if it works out for you.
This is the way it seems to me: A non-engineer (you) is attempting to build a 951 motor larger than pretty much any that have ever been built before using a mismash of parts without a really in-depth attempt to engineer the motor and do it right, but rather, do it on the cheap. It just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen (at the worse) or an interesting experiment that will not yield a reliable motor (at best). If my characterization of your effort is wrong, by all means explain how.
To do it right you have to consider rod angles, head design, compression ratio, weight of all the parts, how the balance shafts will affect everything. There's a reason that people pay JME $$$ for a 3.2L motor. Do you expect your engine to last 10k miles, 100k?
This is the way it seems to me: A non-engineer (you) is attempting to build a 951 motor larger than pretty much any that have ever been built before using a mismash of parts without a really in-depth attempt to engineer the motor and do it right, but rather, do it on the cheap. It just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen (at the worse) or an interesting experiment that will not yield a reliable motor (at best). If my characterization of your effort is wrong, by all means explain how.
To do it right you have to consider rod angles, head design, compression ratio, weight of all the parts, how the balance shafts will affect everything. There's a reason that people pay JME $$$ for a 3.2L motor. Do you expect your engine to last 10k miles, 100k?
#34
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Mobile,Al
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Years ago I had a Plymouth Barracuda with a 318 v8(don't laugh) that everyone said couldn't make decent power. I also had a friend who's father built prostock fords. He said "that engine doesn't know what it is or if it has potential or not". Cheesy quote yes, but after some simple machining and common sense mods that same engine made well over 300hp. Nowdays that same engine is good for just over 400hp. Slightly ot I know, but a lot of good things are accomplished by people who don't know they can't. Nice to see somebody attempt to demystify these engines. Chevy parts are great for improving hp/$ ratio. Hard to believe for some, but precision can be acheived with domestic parts too. Btw "aggressive" goals are the ones worth striving for.
#35
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Gulf Shores, Alabama
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A non-engineer (you) is attempting to build a 951 motor larger than pretty much any that have ever been built before using a mismash of parts without a really in-depth attempt to engineer the motor and do it right, but rather, do it on the cheap. It just sounds like a disaster waiting to happen (at the worse) or an interesting experiment that will not yield a reliable motor (at best). If my characterization of your effort is wrong, by all means explain how.