968 3.0 16v turbo. Anybody got any experience with a Garrett gtx 3076
11-06-2018, 11:20 AM
#91
11-06-2018, 12:24 PM
#93
The EFR does have a nother senter house, so it wont fit directly, but it saved me from alot of hours.
380 dollar with some mods.
http://www.broadfootracing.com/performance_parts.htm
380 dollar with some mods.
http://www.broadfootracing.com/performance_parts.htm
11-06-2018, 01:05 PM
#95
Advanced
Thread Starter
11-21-2018, 06:56 AM
#97
Advanced
Thread Starter
Experience...., not really, I have a GT3076 though that I bought for a 3.0 16V project years ago before we changed route and started racing the NA cars.
I'd let it go real cheap if you are interested, only had dyno time before I got it and stored it for years after that.
For what you could get this for, you could have it disassembled, checked and modded to whatever you want.
I might even still have the modded stock/polished crossover that bolts directly up to it with stock engine mount pedestal location.
Best of my recollection, 3.0 16V, good for 500 bhp.
T
I'd let it go real cheap if you are interested, only had dyno time before I got it and stored it for years after that.
For what you could get this for, you could have it disassembled, checked and modded to whatever you want.
I might even still have the modded stock/polished crossover that bolts directly up to it with stock engine mount pedestal location.
Best of my recollection, 3.0 16V, good for 500 bhp.
T
11-21-2018, 01:58 PM
#98
Race Car
Unless Max Energy has a change of plans, only set that was available is gone to a new home with a fellow RL'er.
I did get my new custom CatCams, delivered yesterday though.
The cams are hollow with a bore like a gun barrel down the center which makes them way lighter than factory cams, reground factory cores, etc.
Being that camshafts spin at 1/2 rpm, and this weight reduction is at and near center, doubt there's any real world benefit, but definitely a substantial decrease in rotating mass.
Close to 4 pounds worth, nearly 2 lbs each cam lighter.
Stock 19t 944S/S2 intake cam - (in oz)
CatCams 19t 944S .474/.454 - (in oz)
Over 30 oz difference.
T
I did get my new custom CatCams, delivered yesterday though.
The cams are hollow with a bore like a gun barrel down the center which makes them way lighter than factory cams, reground factory cores, etc.
Being that camshafts spin at 1/2 rpm, and this weight reduction is at and near center, doubt there's any real world benefit, but definitely a substantial decrease in rotating mass.
Close to 4 pounds worth, nearly 2 lbs each cam lighter.
Stock 19t 944S/S2 intake cam - (in oz)
CatCams 19t 944S .474/.454 - (in oz)
Over 30 oz difference.
T
11-21-2018, 02:10 PM
#99
Race Car
To anybody is USA, the company's listed US vendor is about as unresponsive as any company I have even approached..., don't waste your time.
I had conversations with a couple of European suppliers and settled on one that turned out to be the fast track to get these.
PM if interested.
Northern porker, same source I already shared with you.
If you are retaining hydraulic lifters, these are the maximum lift/duration recommended by Cat.
290/282 duration @.1mm
29 degrees overlap probably not a good turbo cam....
T
I had conversations with a couple of European suppliers and settled on one that turned out to be the fast track to get these.
PM if interested.
Northern porker, same source I already shared with you.
If you are retaining hydraulic lifters, these are the maximum lift/duration recommended by Cat.
290/282 duration @.1mm
29 degrees overlap probably not a good turbo cam....
T
11-22-2018, 04:26 AM
#100
Advanced
Thread Starter
To anybody is USA, the company's listed US vendor is about as unresponsive as any company I have even approached..., don't waste your time.
I had conversations with a couple of European suppliers and settled on one that turned out to be the fast track to get these.
PM if interested.
Northern porker, same source I already shared with you.
If you are retaining hydraulic lifters, these are the maximum lift/duration recommended by Cat.
290/282 duration @.1mm
29 degrees overlap probably not a good turbo cam....
T
I had conversations with a couple of European suppliers and settled on one that turned out to be the fast track to get these.
PM if interested.
Northern porker, same source I already shared with you.
If you are retaining hydraulic lifters, these are the maximum lift/duration recommended by Cat.
290/282 duration @.1mm
29 degrees overlap probably not a good turbo cam....
T
11-22-2018, 07:03 PM
#103
Race Car
1st pic is stock 944S intake, 2nd pic is Cat billet steel, which edge....?
You mean the lobes themselves....?
I might have snapped a couple more that I can post a point of interest, but they are already boxed back up and headed to MM who's waiting for them to couple with my cylinder head to make some checks. I didn't measure the lobe width either but they looked narrower slightly compared to factory but it could just be that lift is taller, making it appear that way.
T
You mean the lobes themselves....?
I might have snapped a couple more that I can post a point of interest, but they are already boxed back up and headed to MM who's waiting for them to couple with my cylinder head to make some checks. I didn't measure the lobe width either but they looked narrower slightly compared to factory but it could just be that lift is taller, making it appear that way.
T
