2020 Proposed SP3 Rules Changes
Ideas?
|
My usual:
Make a class for cars that are more like E than SP3. Of course, lower the weight from E a bit. Kind of SP1 for the SP3s but not as strict. |
Thanks for the suggestion. I get where you are trying to accomplish.
But after 18 successful years of developing the 944 Cup, elimaninating the class would not be a practucal option for racing the 944. In fact, quite a few SP 3 model cars origanilly came from E class and they left that class for better racing the 944. Evidenced by the fact that a 944 in E is a rare sight. Proof of concept. As to the rules of SP3, aka Super Cup, the rules originally started out very similar to SP1, much closer to spec rather GT. Fact is that the class was not successful in that configuration. The class was close to be eliminated just a few years back. In a last ditch effort to save the class, we opened up the rules to allow for more mods. That's when the class, now called SP3, took off. Asking the SP3 drivers to detune their cars would be class suicide. At best it would split the cars for those models into two classes.and dilute the competition in class. This would be counter to the 944 CUP objective of fewer classes, bigger fields. And that is basically what happened with SP 1 and SP2, which was not a desirable effect overall.
Originally Posted by esscape26
(Post 15761055)
My usual:
Make a class for cars that are more like E than SP3. Of course, lower the weight from E a bit. Kind of SP1 for the SP3s but not as strict. |
sp3 rule changes
I'm fine with the rules as they are.
|
Another vote to leave as is.
T |
Originally Posted by jem60
(Post 15765410)
I'm fine with the rules as they are.
Originally Posted by 951and944S
(Post 15765456)
Another vote to leave as is.
T |
Originally Posted by 944Cup
(Post 15766034)
Thanks for the input. Currently no changes in the works.
The 2.5 16V will be the mini-mouse of the entire class and I'd hate to see something drastic change now to make me any less confident that this platform can be competitive. T |
Originally Posted by 951and944S
(Post 15779133)
Good, I'm slowly chipping away at an eventual 944S entry as per current rules and I'll tell you, it was a tough decision.
The 2.5 16V will be the mini-mouse of the entire class and I'd hate to see something drastic change now to make me any less confident that this platform can be competitive. T |
Single-Vendor Products
I'm generally not a fan of single-vendor products. For the 951, I'd like to see alternatives to the Lindsey waste gate. Tial?
|
Originally Posted by PorscheRacerBoy
(Post 15812150)
I'm generally not a fan of single-vendor products. For the 951, I'd like to see alternatives to the Lindsey waste gate. Tial?
|
Originally Posted by PorscheRacerBoy
(Post 15812150)
I'm generally not a fan of single-vendor products. For the 951, I'd like to see alternatives to the Lindsey waste gate. Tial?
|
SP3
IMHO, SP3 is now separated by "aero" and non-aero cars. At some tracks, proper Aero makes a difference, and in the true spirit of a spec class I not sure Aero belongs in SP3. I'm not talking about a good front splitter, but the huge wings that are common. It would level the SP3 playing field.
|
Well, in general, if you have problems with quality or availability, and there is only 1 supplier, you are royally stuck. The more supply options you have, the better.
|
Originally Posted by por944s2
(Post 15820471)
IMHO, SP3 is now separated by "aero" and non-aero cars. At some tracks, proper Aero makes a difference, and in the true spirit of a spec class I not sure Aero belongs in SP3. I'm not talking about a good front splitter, but the huge wings that are common. It would level the SP3 playing field.
I recognize there are some drivers that this doesn't make a difference. They are simply that good. However, I completely agree regarding "the true spirit of a spec class." The larger rear wings don't seem to make sense. |
Originally Posted by drive418
(Post 15824607)
^^ +1
I recognize there are some drivers that this doesn't make a difference. They are simply that good. However, I completely agree regarding "the true spirit of a spec class." The larger rear wings don't seem to make sense. For many years, SP3 struggled with small fields. The class was almost ended. But in a last ditch desperation move to save the class, the rules were changed. Trying to find the right level of allowed mods to attract more cars, the rules were loosen up to allow for building more of a race car with options for the driver to find the best alternatives for performance. Once we made those rules changes, the class took off and the class now averages the largest fields of the 3 PCA SP944 classes. Specifically about the wings, maybe the fastest and most successful driver in SP3 up to now has been Karl Poeltl . He drives SP3 cars that basically have no aero beyond stock. Karl wins just about ever race he enters in SP3. That's says to me that club racing these cars is still much more about the driver and less about the aero mods on the car. However, for those who want to race in the true spirit of a spec class in a 944, there is SP 1. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...53c762db59.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...324a6932fe.jpg |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:06 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands