Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

1991 S4 fails emissions after tune up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2017, 05:06 PM
  #1  
damonoresky
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
damonoresky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Folsom, Ca
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1991 S4 fails emissions after tune up

Hi All,

I have a 1991 S4 that is failing the emissions tests after a tune up. The car is in California, Sacramento area and has about 55K miles on it. I literally drove the car from the work shop after the tuneup was done to the emissions test facility and it failed. The car was warm as it is about a 30 minute drive. In the past 4 years (2x testing) the car passed with flying colors.

The NO (PPM) is measuring 1167 when the max allowed is 706. This is at 25mph. The car passed at 15mph with a reading of 134 where the max is 767.

And even though the tune up was done (plugs, wires, cap) the car still runs a bit rough at idle even when warm. It will idle fine, "chug" a bit after a few minutes, the battery gauge dips, and you need to rev it up a bit or go into neutral or it will stall. This randomly happens at red lights or even when just backing out of a parking space after driving.

I don't fault the shop as the car does run better than before and the owner admitted he is not a 928 "expert." He does work on a lot of new Porsche though.

Any tips or ideas where to start would be appreciated. Oh, lastly, a few years ago the car did register a bad Hall sensor but it passed emissions 2x with that.

Thanks in advance!
Damon
Old 04-17-2017, 07:11 PM
  #2  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

High NO generally means a lean mixture. Interesting that it is OK (by a wide margin) at 15mph and then fail (also by a wide margin) at 25.

Can you post the complete results, as well as the previous test? There are likely some clues there.

And the rough idle, stumbling and stalling is another good clue, which also points to a lean mixture. These engines idle great when a bit rich, but fall on their face when lean.

It could be an air leak, a split hose under the intake or similar that would allow unmetered air to bypass the MAF. Has the intake been up to check those hoses?

It could also be an aging MAF, that would tend to cause a lean mixture. Aging is both a function of miles and stop/start cycles, it is actually the burn-off cycle when the engine is shut down that causes the most aging. But generally they are good for 60-100K before falling far enough out of spec to fail testing.

What about the O2 sensor, has that ever been swapped? That will also cause a lean mixture and is simpler/cheaper to swap. Typically those are good for about 60K miles.

A bad hall sensor would retard the timing, which would actually reduce NO a little.
Old 04-17-2017, 07:44 PM
  #3  
damonoresky
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
damonoresky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Folsom, Ca
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the information, this is a good start. The shop did mention that they "cleaned" the MAF (is this even possible?) and maybe that messed it up? Can these be replaced? I believe he said they are not available anywhere to replace.

I can dig up the old emissions results but I am pretty certain the numbers were fairly identical for both speed tests in previous times.
Old 04-17-2017, 07:59 PM
  #4  
OTR18WHEELER
You can call me Otis
Rennlist Member
 
OTR18WHEELER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Terre Haute, Indiana
Posts: 6,662
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I'm no emissions expert, but I believe the grade/octane rating of the fuel, and the type of spark plugs can affect the lean condition.
you should have standard copper plugs, and avoid the lower octane gas.
Lower octane ignites quicker, hence leans the mixture.
Old 04-17-2017, 09:11 PM
  #5  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by damonoresky
Thanks for the information, this is a good start. The shop did mention that they "cleaned" the MAF (is this even possible?) and maybe that messed it up? Can these be replaced? I believe he said they are not available anywhere to replace.
Yes, and yes. Your friendly local auto-parts store sells spray-cans of "Mass Air Flow sensor cleaner" (CRC and other brands), but it doesn't do much for these types of "hot wire" MAFs. There is also some risk of breaking the hot-wire element by being over-zealous. But in that case the engine would barely run (if at all). So that's not it.

New MAFs are indeed unavailable (and would be unaffordable otherwise), but rebuilt/recalibrated MAFs are available.
Louie Ott (louie928 here) is the agent for JDS Porsche in the UK, his website is here:
https://www.performance928.com/products.html
I am handling shipping for Louie for the next few weeks.
I can also test your MAF ff you want to send it here, see Louie's website for details and PM me for my shipping address.
Also I believe that Roger has MAFs in stock, not sure about testing.

I think the most likely issue is a split hose somewhere. Have a look around for any disconnected hoses, but most of those leaks hide under the intake.
The shop should have a smoke-tester for finding intake leaks, I would start by asking if they can have a look with that.

If that's OK then O2 sensor and MAF would be next on my list, but with only 55K miles I am not confident of that being the problem. Testing the MAF however would answer that question.

Originally Posted by damonoresky
I can dig up the old emissions results but I am pretty certain the numbers were fairly identical for both speed tests in previous times.
Yes, that's what would be expected. But it would also be useful to see the how the HC and CO numbers compare from before to now.
Old 04-17-2017, 09:19 PM
  #6  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,322
Received 1,542 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

Mass-Air Sensor likely (very) needs to be rebuilt: JDS Porsche, Injection Labs.

Dying at warm idle - assuming single failure mode - in an automatic is usually the MAS.

An intake 'smoke test' will show false air.

O2 sensor may be dead or dying.

Need HC and CO results for better diagnosis.

Poor emissions on an S4+ is usually at least two of: bad MAS, O2, or false air.
Old 04-17-2017, 09:19 PM
  #7  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OTR18WHEELER
I'm no emissions expert, but I believe the grade/octane rating of the fuel, and the type of spark plugs can affect the lean condition.
you should have standard copper plugs, and avoid the lower octane gas.
Lower octane ignites quicker, hence leans the mixture.
Good thoughts. The anomaly here is the big difference between the 15mph and 25mph tests. I would think octane or spark-plug issues would be relatively constant. A split hose on the other hand would behave differently with different engine vacuum, which would be RPM-dependent.

But that's a good question: Damon, what kind of pugs are in there? Does it show on your receipt? What you want are Bosch W7DCR+ copper plugs, nothing fancy.
Old 04-17-2017, 10:16 PM
  #8  
V2Rocket
Rainman
Rennlist Member
 
V2Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 45,497
Received 632 Likes on 490 Posts
Default

Oxygen sensor dying will cause fluctuating warm idle.
As said previously lean mixture tends to lead to higher NOx and also affects idle smoothness.
Don't know the specific RPM on the 928S4 DME, but in earlier Motronic the O2 sensor has a "minimum RPM" to activate closed loop, with coolant in a particular temperature range. 1500 might be below the threshold but 2500rpm or so for the 25mph test is right in there.
Old 04-17-2017, 10:33 PM
  #9  
Richard S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Richard S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 3,695
Received 123 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Hey Damon,
Hope everything else is going well, its been a long time since we've touched base.

If you need to smog it in a hurry, you can borrow my MAF. I had it rebuilt in December. Mine passed smog just last week.

BTW, EuroSunday is this weekend in Roseville if you can make it.

Rich
Old 04-17-2017, 11:31 PM
  #10  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

I'd add the LH controller to the candidate list of causes, along with dirty fuel injectors. I can speak to low-miles seldom-driven cars as candidates for varnished injectors as cause for higher NOx readings.

You can gently pressure-test the intake system to find if there are air leaks. But leaks generally show up worse at idle, as manifold pressure is lower and an air leak will be a higher percentage of total intake charge.

Basic checks of fuel pressure would be a Good Idea before you get too far along.

Does the car have fresh fuel in it now? Old gas can be a problem.

There are some good in-the-car injector cleaning systems that have demonstrated value in helping this situation. It's hardly worth the cost of trying to assemble a DIY solution IMO, so ask your shop if they have a system they recommend. Someone here may jump in with a recommendation. The new plugs should readily show where there are lean cylinders after a bit of normal driving under load.

As others share, the Bosch plain copper plugs have a colder electrode than the premium platinum plugs pushed by many shops. The original fitment was the Bosch WR7DC, but that sells under a new number now. Your parts seller will know the four-digit number. I've had best luck getting them in sets from one of our regular 928 parts places, vs getting mixed batches from a few local parts places.

Get with Rich S for the easy things to test, like the MAF and the LH controller. Go from there.
Old 04-18-2017, 03:32 AM
  #11  
damonoresky
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
damonoresky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Folsom, Ca
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks all for the info and advice, this is truly one of the best forums around.

Rich, I may take you up on that offer and perhaps also see you at the Euro Sunday if my car can make it all the way there
Old 04-18-2017, 03:03 PM
  #12  
damonoresky
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
damonoresky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Folsom, Ca
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Jim,

The paperwork says that the plugs are WR7DC+. Other than that all they did was spray some cleaner the MAF sensor and said there were no visible line leaks.

Also there was a suggestion that there could be carbon build up on the valves and I could run something (C-foam? (sp?)) thru some vacuum lines into the intake that would clean them? Sounds a bit hokey to me...
Old 04-18-2017, 03:53 PM
  #13  
Chalkboss
Rennlist Member
 
Chalkboss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: California
Posts: 2,393
Received 177 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Show up on Sunday! It would be good to meet you, I'll be there. If Rich comes we can quickly swap the MAF out. Rich, I'll bring the HF screwdriver
Old 04-18-2017, 04:15 PM
  #14  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,049
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

You can check for possible intake leaks by testing the vacuum at the front fuel damper. At warm idle you should get about 20"Hg. A much lower reading indicates an intake leak.
Old 04-18-2017, 06:44 PM
  #15  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by damonoresky
Hi All,

I have a 1991 S4 that is failing the emissions tests after a tune up. The car is in California, Sacramento area and has about 55K miles on it. I literally drove the car from the work shop after the tuneup was done to the emissions test facility and it failed. The car was warm as it is about a 30 minute drive. In the past 4 years (2x testing) the car passed with flying colors.

The NO (PPM) is measuring 1167 when the max allowed is 706. This is at 25mph. The car passed at 15mph with a reading of 134 where the max is 767.

And even though the tune up was done (plugs, wires, cap) the car still runs a bit rough at idle even when warm. It will idle fine, "chug" a bit after a few minutes, the battery gauge dips, and you need to rev it up a bit or go into neutral or it will stall. This randomly happens at red lights or even when just backing out of a parking space after driving.

I don't fault the shop as the car does run better than before and the owner admitted he is not a 928 "expert." He does work on a lot of new Porsche though.

Any tips or ideas where to start would be appreciated. Oh, lastly, a few years ago the car did register a bad Hall sensor but it passed emissions 2x with that.

Thanks in advance!
Damon
High NOx are very common in the California test....becoming more and more prevalent as these cars get older.

It would be far better if we could see all the test results....there's a bunch of information in those other numbers.

Obviously, from your description of how the car performs, there is something very wrong that a very basic spark plug change didn't fix....and repairing that issue first may be the best way to proceed.

General information:

The O2 sensor (if working) in these cars tends to drive the fuel mixtures (CO) very low. And the information that the O2 sensor interprets and reacts to is an average of all the cylinders. If one cylinder is lean because of an intake leak or a poorly performing injector, the NOx will be driven up.

The very first thing we check when we get a car with high NOx (common) is the entire intake system for leaks. We use a smoke tester (best tool I've bought in years) to do this.
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!







Quick Reply: 1991 S4 fails emissions after tune up



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:29 PM.