Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Outer Front Wheel Bearing - Mfg Tolernaces

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2016, 12:10 PM
  #1  
BRB-83-911SC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BRB-83-911SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Woburn MA
Posts: 1,063
Received 86 Likes on 41 Posts
Default Outer Front Wheel Bearing - Mfg Tolernaces

I have studied numerous threads on front wheel bearings, and fully understand and have followed the correct R&R and adjustment procedures. However, I have not seen any discussion concerning fit variations among different bearing mfgs.

Short backstory: bearing play led to failed state inspection on original and properly adjusted bearings. Car has 48,000 miles. New bearings/races installed, yet acceptable level of wheel freeplay (or lack of) cannot be obtained when adjusted properly.

Inner bearings have a nice tight slip fit on spindle, however, the outer bearings have significant "wiggle" when slipped into position on the spindle. There are no obvious visible signs of spindle damage (picture of underside of spindle below) from what I can tell. These are new NTN (made in USA) bearings. I ordered SKF, but NTN came in the box, if that matters.

In the posts I have read, there is much said about spindle wear on the underside where the inner bearing sits, but I have not found discussion of spindle wear in the outer bearing location.

How "tight" should the outer bearing fit on the spindle?
Is it possible that there are mfg variances among bearing mfgrs?
Do I need to buy an assortment of bearings and go with best fit?
Can anything be gleaned from the photo below of the spindle underside (other than that my camera focused on my face)?
Attached Images  
Old 10-03-2016, 12:27 PM
  #2  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,826
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Mic the spindle, mic the bearing inner/outer race and find out which is out of spec. It should be a very snug fit with no play. Highly doubt it's the bearing.
Old 10-03-2016, 01:32 PM
  #3  
jas79
Intermediate
 
jas79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ronneby, Sweden
Posts: 38
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In my opinion it looks like rotation marks on the spindle. Is it possible that the inner race has rotated on the spindle, and worn it down? In that case I think that you should feel the wear with a fingertip. I recommend that you measure the spindle.

/Mattias
Old 10-03-2016, 01:41 PM
  #4  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Bearings are manufacturer to very tight tolerances, as are spindles. If you can't feel anything running a fingernail across the outer bearing surface on the spindle, then that is not likely the problem.

There was a change in the outer bearing in '86 (between 86 and 86.5), larger outer bearing and changes to the spindle and hub to match. (Inner bearing was unchanged).

This is an '84, correct? Any chance that someone has swapped to later (86.5+) hubs but didn't change the spindles? In that case the later bearings (999-059-089-00) would fit the hubs properly but be loose on the spindle. The early bearings (999-059-067-00) would fit the spindle properly but be very loose in the hubs. Which outer bearings do you have?
Old 10-03-2016, 03:11 PM
  #5  
BRB-83-911SC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BRB-83-911SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Woburn MA
Posts: 1,063
Received 86 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcorenman
Bearings are manufacturer to very tight tolerances, as are spindles. If you can't feel anything running a fingernail across the outer bearing surface on the spindle, then that is not likely the problem.

There was a change in the outer bearing in '86 (between 86 and 86.5), larger outer bearing and changes to the spindle and hub to match. (Inner bearing was unchanged).

This is an '84, correct? Any chance that someone has swapped to later (86.5+) hubs but didn't change the spindles? In that case the later bearings (999-059-089-00) would fit the hubs properly but be loose on the spindle. The early bearings (999-059-067-00) would fit the spindle properly but be very loose in the hubs. Which outer bearings do you have?
Yes, it's an 84, non-ABS. As far as I can tell, original hubs and spindles - 48,000 mile car with all records from new. The outer bearing I have is 999.059.067.00. It's a proper fit in the hub, and maybe .02 mm loose on the spindle - enough that it is not a tight slip fit.
Old 10-03-2016, 03:38 PM
  #6  
jcorenman
Rennlist Member
 
jcorenman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Friday Harbor, WA
Posts: 4,041
Received 292 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

That's the correct bearing. And a 0.02mm clearance would be pretty tight, less than 0.001" which would translate to only a couple thou at the edge of the rim.
But if the bearing feels at all loose on the spindle then that's not right, and the issue is most likely with the spindle.
Like Doc said, you need to measure carefully and compare bearing to spindle.

48K with all records, cool! Is there any indication that the bearings or hubs have even been touched before?
How were the outer bearings that came out? At 48K they should be like new. Any roughness, or signs of discoloration or scoring on the ID?

Are you sure that the looseness is bearings and not tie-rods or steering rack? (If it is loose all around then it is likely bearings; if only loose in the 9-3 o'clock direction, but not 12-6, then steering-related).
Old 10-03-2016, 04:30 PM
  #7  
BRB-83-911SC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BRB-83-911SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Woburn MA
Posts: 1,063
Received 86 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jcorenman
But if the bearing feels at all loose on the spindle then that's not right
Yes, you can "rock" the bearing ever so slightly.

Originally Posted by jcorenman
and the issue is most likely with the spindle.
Seems so. Was hoping maybe someone had come across issues with bearing variances between brands, but I know unlikely.

Originally Posted by jcorenman
Like Doc said, you need to measure carefully and compare bearing to spindle.
Mic showed about .02 mm difference; we also test fit the bearing with a layer of tin foil between it's ID and spindle, and it seemed to fit correctly (unscientific reality check)

Originally Posted by jcorenman
Is there any indication that the bearings or hubs have even been touched before?
No, I believe what came out was factory original hardware.

Originally Posted by jcorenman
How were the outer bearings that came out? At 48K they should be like new. Any roughness, or signs of discoloration or scoring on the ID?
Old bearings looked really good, with no roughness or notable discoloration.

Originally Posted by jcorenman
Are you sure that the looseness is bearings and not tie-rods or steering rack? (If it is loose all around then it is likely bearings; if only loose in the 9-3 o'clock direction, but not 12-6, then steering-related).
Movement at wheel is at 12-6, and you can see the brake disk move, but caliper does not. I think this isolates it to the hub.

I'm working with Dave Chamberland on this, so I have a qualified set of eyes on this. Maybe I'm in denial and the spindles are worn, or the play is "normal" - although you would expect the car to pass inspection with properly adjusted bearings. Even so, the right front wheel has more movement than I am comfortable with.

I guess a key point is that the installation of new inner and outer bearings and races made absolutely no difference in wheel play, and I'm talking myself into the likely reality that the spindles are the issue.

Short of replacing NLA spindles with used (which may be no better than my low mileage spindles), what options are there? Just live with it?
Old 10-03-2016, 06:34 PM
  #8  
Majestic Moose
Burning Brakes
 
Majestic Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nazareth, PA
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I had the same issue. I kept messing with the spindle nut tension and finally I gave in and just tightened them more than they 'should' be. I have left them at a point that I can barely discern any play when rocking a mounted wheel but they are not rock solid.
All new steering and suspension components and the spindles looked fine at 74k miles.
Old 10-03-2016, 07:54 PM
  #9  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,328
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Default

Brian's post of .02mm difference between the spindle and inner race may be off. I seem to recall .2mm.

BUT, the device I was using to measure has surpassed its useful life and wasn't, perhaps, ideal for the job when new. New tool needs to be procured.

Even with the spindle nut tightened _all_ the way; there's still too much play in the outer bearing (and too much pre-load on the rollers.)

As Brian wrote above: it's not the rest of the suspension. It's definitely the outer bearing.
Old 10-03-2016, 11:01 PM
  #10  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 830 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

I have had this issue crop up before with the NTN bearings when they were available. Not in every case but in a couple of situations. This was a couple or maybe three years ago. Since then I have only been able to buy OEM SKF bearings. IIRC I replaced them with the more expensive Porsche (SKF) bearing and the issue was resolved.
You may want to try a Porsche sourced bearing or an OEM SKF.
I agree with Jim that the manufacturer should not make a difference if it is the correct bearing.
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 10-03-2016, 11:21 PM
  #11  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 27,891
Received 2,251 Likes on 1,245 Posts
Default

I would follow Rogers advice and try a different MFG of bearings.

FWIW the spindles on all of the cars appear to not be very hard.
IE they will deform from the inner races rubbing on them.
This wear issue is more prevalent on the inner bearing and can be confirmed by inspecting the spindle on the bottom of the seating surface of the inner bearing.
OR by using a fresh bearing and placing it onto the seating area.

MMoose you should loosen the wheel bearing and tighten it as specified, based on your report the bearing is too tight and will cause damage to occur.

NOTE when fitting the bearings ,
you should surface the flat washer and the spindle nut with some 400 grit paper.
do both sides of the washer.

This will reduce the chances of false reading when the sliding friction test is performed.
you should be able to push the washer to either side without prying on any part of the hub.

That said most wheel bearings on the 928 will exhibit a small amount of play in the 12 to 6 direction with a properly adjusted wheel bearing.

this play will also be felt in the brake pedal while backing up and then going forward.

In the grand scheme of things its better to have the wheel bearing loose rather than tight,
it may rattle but it wont seize.

NOW if its over tightened then the chances go way up that a hot expanding hub will cause more heat to be generated, and thus possible cause the inner or outer bearing to seize on the spindle
Old 10-04-2016, 08:13 AM
  #12  
Dave928S
Rennlist Member
 
Dave928S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 4,681
Received 64 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I've struck that very same issue with my '82. I cleaned the spindles up and they looked fine .... until I looked carefully at the underside, which was worn more than the rest of the circumference. Measurement confirmed that I would never be able to get a bearing to seat on them without the sort of play that you report (12 - 6 movement).

I changed spindles with some used good ones, and the problem was solved.

I had contemplated using a Loktite bearing mount product, as I figured that would do the job, but didn't know for how long considering the heat soak from brakes. I also thought that the spindle could be machined and fitted with a shrink sleeve, to restore the original diameter/fit, which seemed the better alternative for a repair ... if I'd taken that path.
Old 10-04-2016, 10:12 AM
  #13  
Majestic Moose
Burning Brakes
 
Majestic Moose's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Nazareth, PA
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
MMoose you should loosen the wheel bearing and tighten it as specified, based on your report the bearing is too tight and will cause damage to occur.
I will re-investigate, and my bearings are SKF.
Old 10-04-2016, 10:34 AM
  #14  
BRB-83-911SC
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
BRB-83-911SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Woburn MA
Posts: 1,063
Received 86 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Thanks everyone for taking the time to offer comments. I will try a set of SKF bearings and see if they fit any differently.



Quick Reply: Outer Front Wheel Bearing - Mfg Tolernaces



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:51 PM.