Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Project ‘Gary’ – 1982 Wine Red/Black

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-23-2016, 10:26 PM
  #31  
hlee96
Rennlist Member
 
hlee96's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Near Mushroom Capital of the World
Posts: 3,017
Received 196 Likes on 124 Posts
Default

Oh, didn't know that Gary had already bought the parts to be placed. Go at it!
Old 08-23-2016, 10:32 PM
  #32  
SwedeInSiam
Rennlist Member
 
SwedeInSiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Rayong, THAILAND
Posts: 345
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by walt_mink;13549224Hrm
I read one thread which said that this swap would work just fine, but I guess I'll have to do more research. I have a signal generator that I can use to compare the two. I'll try to do that when I get home.
I've changed from a '80 MPH to a '81 KPH speedo on my '80 without any problems. They both use the same pulse sender, '82 is same speedos and pulse senders as '80.
Old 08-23-2016, 10:41 PM
  #33  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by hlee96
Oh, didn't know that Gary had already bought the parts to be placed. Go at it!
Sooooooooo many parts! For example, I have 7 analog clocks that all work fine. Gary got into ebay in the early days and went 928 nuts.
Old 08-23-2016, 10:42 PM
  #34  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SwedeInSiam
I've changed from a '80 MPH to a '81 KPH speedo on my '80 without any problems. They both use the same pulse sender, '82 is same speedos and pulse senders as '80.
Thanks for the bump in confidence. I might still bench test and compare just out of nerdy compulsion.
Old 08-24-2016, 03:31 PM
  #35  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by walt_mink
Thanks for the bump in confidence. I might still bench test and compare just out of nerdy compulsion.
Mine '85 was in MPH and the KM/H speedo came from an unknown year 928.
Old 09-03-2016, 01:59 AM
  #36  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Quick update: I did a couple of days in the shop doing the least sexy jobs that can be imagined. I finished pulling the two wiring harnesses from the engine bay and got the CE panel pulled.

Evidence/trophies:






Those were hard fought, but I think it'll be worth it. I'm going to clean the hell out of the harnesses and will also clean each connector. After that, I'll check the resistance of each circuit. Should be hours and hours of fun!

It's getting cleaner, both in the engine bay and in the interior:






Once I get they hydraulic system removed I can move on to the rear of the car. Next up is to drop the fuel tank and get the torque tube and transaxle removed. After that I can get it over to the detailer who will clean the bejebus out of everything.

In the meantime, I'm welding up a quick body dolly so that I can pull the suspension once it's all clean.

I did get stymied by one issue. I was trying to remove the doors, but ended up ruining one of the bolts and couldn't get another to move. I suspect the paint is giving me a hard time. I'll try some TLC from the smoke wrench next time I'm out there to see if that helps. I'll probably just have to cut the head off the one I ruined. I'll hopefully weld a nut to the remains to get it out.
Old 09-03-2016, 10:24 AM
  #37  
marine928
Rennlist Member
 
marine928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kingwood/Humble
Posts: 653
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

How are you keeping track of everything for the re-assembly. Do you have a completion date in mind. What a story, a real tribute to Gary.
Old 09-03-2016, 12:08 PM
  #38  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by marine928
How are you keeping track of everything for the re-assembly. Do you have a completion date in mind. What a story, a real tribute to Gary.
Yeah, that's the million dollar question, isn't it? Here's my general process:

1) Take a bazillion photos - before, during, and after disassembly.
2) Make a quick sketch and a description of the assembly on a 3x5 card
3) Store the parts in either a large ziplock bag or in a takeout container like this.

I'm still worried about sending things out to the plater. I'm not sure how I'm going to be able to dump all of the hardware into a bucket and then sort it back out for reassembly. I'm going to have to spend some quality time with my notes and the parts diagrams to make sure I have confidence. Otherwise I'll have to measure and catalog each nut and bolt. That does NOT sound like fun.
Old 09-03-2016, 12:21 PM
  #39  
77tony
Rennlist Member
 
77tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 8,417
Received 152 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Do the cad plating in your garage: http://www.caswellplating.com/electr...ting-kits.html
Old 09-03-2016, 02:02 PM
  #40  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

If you haven't already, grab a copy of the parts catalog (PET) online from Porsche as PDF. It lists all the fasteners. Although not the perfect guide, it will help a lot as you sort and organize.

Note that new fasteners from Porsche are frequently not plated as original. If you want the consistent yellow cad plating that was originally supplied, you'll want to have your pieces replated. I'll warn you now that while the zinc-plus-yellow plating process is popular among platers, and looks "OK" when it's first done, it doesn't hold up nearly as well as the original cad. Since you are in an aircraft-supplier neighborhood, you should be able to find a good plater that will do your bits by the pound, delivered in your bucket. The bucket method means all your pieces are together and will need to be sorted and cataloged again when you get them back, of course. But you do get to do all of them so they are the same. Lots of engine bits and brackets get the treatment too at the same time.
Old 09-03-2016, 03:03 PM
  #41  
Randy V
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Randy V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Insane Diego, California
Posts: 40,430
Received 92 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I'm sure Gary would be proud.
Old 09-07-2016, 08:48 PM
  #42  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 77tony
Neat - thanks! I think I'll leave the bulk up to the pros, but I'll keep this in mind for the stuff that I'll invariably miss.

Originally Posted by dr bob
If you haven't already, grab a copy of the parts catalog (PET) online from Porsche as PDF. It lists all the fasteners. Although not the perfect guide, it will help a lot as you sort and organize.

Note that new fasteners from Porsche are frequently not plated as original. If you want the consistent yellow cad plating that was originally supplied, you'll want to have your pieces replated. I'll warn you now that while the zinc-plus-yellow plating process is popular among platers, and looks "OK" when it's first done, it doesn't hold up nearly as well as the original cad. Since you are in an aircraft-supplier neighborhood, you should be able to find a good plater that will do your bits by the pound, delivered in your bucket. The bucket method means all your pieces are together and will need to be sorted and cataloged again when you get them back, of course. But you do get to do all of them so they are the same. Lots of engine bits and brackets get the treatment too at the same time.
Thanks dr bob. The only thing about the PET that makes me nervous is the lack of grade specification. They just say something like "hex-head M5x12". Now, I'm fully aware that that's just me overthinking things, but that sort of crud keeps me up at night.

You're also right that there are a bevy of good platers around here that are willing to do yellow CAD the right way. We're very lucky in that aspect.

Originally Posted by Randy V
I'm sure Gary would be proud.
Thanks Randy. That's nice of you to say.
Old 09-07-2016, 09:00 PM
  #43  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Small progress from the bench while I'm stuck in the office. As mentioned before, I'm moving over to the 160mph speedo and there was some concern that they wouldn't swap easily. I decided a bench test was in order before I buttoned everything up. Here's my test rig:

**Note - do not let the specter of cool equipment fool you into thinking I know what I'm doing. I use this stuff for work in very limited ways. I am in no way an EE. Proceed at your own risk.**

Since the VDO speedo is looking for pulses sent to it from the sensor I decided to mimic that. I used my small DC regulated power supply set at 12.3v to connect to the '+12v' terminal with the ground on '-'.

From there, I setup my function generator to output a square wave at 80hz with a high of 5v and a low of 0v with a duty of 50%. This should turn out to be 43mph.




That checks out. I can also see the worm gear crawling along without a gear to interface with.

So, with that done, I hooked up the 160mph unit to the same configuration to see if it reads the same.




That's a check. Also, as you can see, the trip meter and odometer are working just fine.

Now, just because I'm infantile I cranked up the frequency to 180Hz.




Oooh - I can almost feel the wind in my hair.

Anywho - I'll probably also figure out how to bench test the rest of the pod so that I don't have to worry about installing any duds. I'll post that too when I get around to doing it.
Old 09-07-2016, 09:09 PM
  #44  
bureau13
Rennlist Member
 
bureau13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,478
Received 55 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I might be misinterpreting what you've done here...but those speedometer readings don't look the same to me...the second one is more like 48, isn't it?
Old 09-07-2016, 10:50 PM
  #45  
walt_mink
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
walt_mink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hmm. I don't remember seeing that, so I'm hoping it's just the perspective, but I'll retest it in the morning to be sure. Perhaps my pointer is off the proper zero.


Quick Reply: Project ‘Gary’ – 1982 Wine Red/Black



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:58 AM.