Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

5.0L euro dyno?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-09-2013, 05:43 PM
  #1  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default 5.0L euro dyno?

I have a dyno from the Kibort built Scott 5.0L euro restricted by running L jet AFM.....does anyone else have dyno sheets from a 5.0L euro? If so please post it with the setup you run, specifically the exhaust to achieve the dyno #.... Here is Scott's full race 5.0L euro with Devek cams, MSDS headers into a single 3.5" exhaust, but restricted by the L jet AFM

Last edited by IcemanG17; 03-11-2014 at 04:14 PM.
Old 05-09-2013, 06:08 PM
  #2  
Fabio421
Man of many SIGs
Rennlist Member
 
Fabio421's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 8,722
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Ducman has a 5L euro hybrid that he's run on the dyno. Ping him, I'm sure he'd share.
Old 05-09-2013, 08:08 PM
  #3  
Ducman82
 
Ducman82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Marysville WA
Posts: 6,981
Received 18 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Right now, before final tune, with a 3" y to so gle bcc to a flow master and iffy air filter set up I had 250ish hp, 280ish torque at the wheels. Next week info in for final tune "polish" and my new 3" stainless to magna flow, Kuhn filter set up, vac pump..... So I should be around 3 ish I think....... Lots of playing to be had!

And that was a steady state dyno
Old 05-10-2013, 12:42 AM
  #4  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

the reason behind this post is the 5.0L engines that Anderson ran back in the day.......he had nearly 340-340 from his engines.....but I am not sure what ECU ran them...I would guess it was LH-EZF but only Mark knows the truth....

I "need" around 316 power factor to top out my class in NASA....I'm at a whopping 250 power factor right now (HP + torque divided by 2 = NASA power factor) 243whp-257 torque = 250 power factor
Old 05-10-2013, 01:02 PM
  #5  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,049
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

With a stock 4.7 litre Euro S and performance chips I'm at "power factor" = 319. But that is flywheel... is the NASA standard rear wheel torque and HP ?
Old 05-10-2013, 05:25 PM
  #6  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
With a stock 4.7 litre Euro S and performance chips I'm at "power factor" = 319. But that is flywheel... is the NASA standard rear wheel torque and HP ?
Yes NASA formula is all wheel HP and torque...for cars with more torque than HP they add them together and divide by 2.....cars with more HP than torque only HP counts.....

So I am at 243whp + 257 torque for 500/2= 250.....with my off track wait (after race) is about 2830lbs so I am at 11.32....which is actually GTS3....but that class is brutally competitive locally...it requires a fresh set of Hoosier A6 every weekend to be competitive, plus a bunch of aero which I don't have...so I bumped up to GTS4 so I can run my slicks at 9-1 or about 314 power factor...

Seans Euro S LH restricted by a L jet intake-AFM made 278-298 or 288....a nice bump for me, but still under the 314ish I need....

Last edited by IcemanG17; 05-10-2013 at 10:05 PM.
Old 05-10-2013, 07:07 PM
  #7  
JakeS2
Racer
 
JakeS2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Finland, Europe
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's mine:

It's 208 kW at the wheels and this dyno is a rototest, hubs are bolted to the test bench directly.
Old 05-10-2013, 07:24 PM
  #8  
Hilton
Nordschleife Master
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ɹəpun uʍop 'ʎəupʎs
Posts: 6,279
Received 54 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

These are some rear-wheel results from a dyno day in Oz back in 2004.. the S2 was bone stock

88 Red 5ltr 4 Auto - 185kw (248hp)
91 Black GT 5ltr 5 Man - 199kw (267hp)
89 Silver 5ltr 4 Auto - 195kw (261hp)
90 Black 5ltr 4 Auto - 186.5kw (250hp)
81 Red 4.5ltr 5 Man - 154.1kw (206hp)
85 White 4.7ltr 5 Man - 205.2kw (275hp)
86 Burgundy 5ltr 4 Auto - 157kw (210hp)
89 Dark Blue 5ltr 4 Auto - 191.9kw (257hp)
Old 05-10-2013, 08:20 PM
  #9  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,099
Received 335 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Does it have to be 16V?

S3 engines are cheap.

Gasket match the intake, chips/FPR, X-pipe, ~313 PF.
Old 05-10-2013, 08:44 PM
  #10  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
the reason behind this post is the 5.0L engines that Anderson ran back in the day.......he had nearly 340-340 from his engines.....but I am not sure what ECU ran them...I would guess it was LH-EZF but only Mark knows the truth....

I "need" around 316 power factor to top out my class in NASA....I'm at a whopping 250 power factor right now (HP + torque divided by 2 = NASA power factor) 243whp-257 torque = 250 power factor
If that 316 is rear wheel, sounds like you need a 5.4 to 6.0 liter "euro" engine.

The torque out of the corners would be amazing......
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 05-10-2013, 08:56 PM
  #11  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
Does it have to be 16V?

S3 engines are cheap.

Gasket match the intake, chips/FPR, X-pipe, ~313 PF.
Because the heads/cam carriers are smaller and don't "hide" so much oil, the 16 valve engines are much "easier", for the track.
Old 05-10-2013, 09:11 PM
  #12  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,099
Received 335 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Because the heads/cam carriers are smaller and don't "hide" so much oil, the 16 valve engines are much "easier", for the track.
Ahhh...
Old 05-10-2013, 10:13 PM
  #13  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
If that 316 is rear wheel, sounds like you need a 5.4 to 6.0 liter "euro" engine.

The torque out of the corners would be amazing......
agreed.......already the strength of the 928, especially with my 2.75 rear end...it is VERY well matched to Thunderhill.....

I also agree that the 16V engines seem a bit easier to track.....or at least usually have a longer lifespan....

Another reason I am committed to the 16V is costs...my SDS injection-ignition requires a distributor, so a 32V would end up costing quite a bit more....but Sean's bone stock S4 engine with race exhaust and stand alone ECU with coil on plug setup made 300whp 340 torque which would be nearly perfect....
Old 05-10-2013, 10:19 PM
  #14  
justaguy
Rennlist Member
 
justaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Greg
That's the plan for the 16v sleeved block I have at your shop. I just need Rods. What size were those pistons again? 4.125 or something silly like that. That thing should make torque .
Old 05-10-2013, 10:23 PM
  #15  
justaguy
Rennlist Member
 
justaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Edmonton,Alberta
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Brian
That 32V engine with a more aggressive cam would be perfect. 320 PF no problem.

The 5.0L euro project should be very close as well. Just need to dump the small AFM and install the euro intake, maf and ECU.


Quick Reply: 5.0L euro dyno?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:37 PM.