Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Rotrex Supercharger thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-25-2012, 04:02 PM
  #76  
Courtshark
Rennlist Member
 
Courtshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Crofton, MD
Posts: 1,941
Received 37 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AO
No... I don't think anyone knows for sure what the limit is. Yes the MAF is maxed out at around 400WHP. The single disc clutch also seems to crap out around 400 WHP. Everything else, so far seems to be able to go well beyond that. Does that mean it was designed for that level? Probably not, but who cares.

What is the limit? I think we are still finding out. Todd T is putting 825 HP at the wheels with a stock motor (never opened up) and stock transmission. So far so good.

I am running pretty damn near 500 at the wheels. And my system is probably the most demanding on the drivetrain with the low torque I make. But so far it's holding up. I hope it continues for a very long time too!

I think the rotrex, turbo, or vortech kits are much easier on the drivetrain components because the boost come on more gradually and thus should be able to withstand a lot of abuse for a long time.
I am definitely concerned about the longevity of the transmission, as well as clutch slip, with adding power. Both issues drove me nuts on my Saab 900 turbo project to the point that I moved on to a car that could handle more power... the 928!

What are the MAF limit workarounds?
Courtshark is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 04:10 PM
  #77  
Jon B.
Three Wheelin'
 
Jon B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NC
Posts: 1,377
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Courtshark
I am definitely concerned about the longevity of the transmission, as well as clutch slip, with adding power. Both issues drove me nuts on my Saab 900 turbo project to the point that I moved on to a car that could handle more power... the 928!

What are the MAF limit workarounds?
I'm guessing the SuperMAF John Speake sells. I know nothing about it however.
Jon B. is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 04:46 PM
  #78  
Bill Ball
Under the Lift
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bill Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Buckeye, AZ
Posts: 18,647
Received 46 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by victor25
The reason I say that this kit will take a stock car to 450chp, is because we hit 100% on the MAF. If I am wrong, and the MAF maxes out before that, then please just tell me.
Yeah, I think this is wrong. There is not a consistent relationship between the MAF signal % (or MAF voltage) and the MAF signal absolute. So, you need to look at the MAF signal absolute number, not %. You would only estimate 450 CHP if you hit a MAF signal absolute of 516 at 6000 RPM.
Bill Ball is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 04:57 PM
  #79  
dprantl
Race Car
 
dprantl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 4,477
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jon B.
I'm guessing the SuperMAF John Speake sells. I know nothing about it however.
Yes, a JDS SuperMAF will do it. There is also a "donut" that Tim Murphy uses on a stock MAF to produce similar results.

I can tell you for a fact that a GT transmission, stock dual-disc clutch, unopened GT engine and all stock GT drivetrain bits will last a long long time at 420rwhp. How long? Well, I have over 75k miles on the supercharger on the GT right now and it's still going strong. Good tuning is key for engine longevity. I can also tell you that a stock single-disc clutch, including a GTS clutch, won't take the abuse for long.

Dan
'91 928GT S/C 475hp/460lb.ft
dprantl is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 05:06 PM
  #80  
Mark Anderson
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Mark Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Anaheim Ca
Posts: 7,044
Received 350 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

For what it's worth my race car uses a stock MAF that I have moved the guts into a larger diameter tube and I make 500 RWHP
Mark Anderson is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:08 PM
  #81  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default








If nothing else, maybe this will change the direction for a few posts.
blown 87 is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:30 PM
  #82  
Mark Anderson
The Parts Whisperer
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Mark Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Anaheim Ca
Posts: 7,044
Received 350 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Blown 87 wins

Last edited by Mark Anderson; 09-25-2012 at 09:26 PM.
Mark Anderson is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:31 PM
  #83  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,049
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

The MAF % is the same scale as MAF Signal Absolute. i.e. 100% MAF signal = MAF signal absolute at 516, the bottom row of the fuel map

It is MAF volts on the screen that limits out at Vmaf = 5.2v when in fact there is still some headroom up to 6.1v by some clever tricks we use ..... and this higher volts corresponds to around 450CHP

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Yeah, I think this is wrong. There is not a consistent relationship between the MAF signal % (or MAF voltage) and the MAF signal absolute. So, you need to look at the MAF signal absolute number, not %. You would only estimate 450 CHP if you hit a MAF signal absolute of 516 at 6000 RPM.
John Speake is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:32 PM
  #84  
victor25
Rennlist Member
 
victor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan... Grand Rapids
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Ball
Yeah, I think this is wrong. There is not a consistent relationship between the MAF signal % (or MAF voltage) and the MAF signal absolute. So, you need to look at the MAF signal absolute number, not %. You would only estimate 450 CHP if you hit a MAF signal absolute of 516 at 6000 RPM.
Bill I"m a little confused.... I have alway used the MAF % value on the sharktuner data plots and not the absolute number. I did this simply because it was, well simpler and easier. Are you saying that when the MAF % value is at 100% that I am not realy at 100%, and that the absolute numbers will continue to climb?

Here is a data log taken from the shark tuner while I was doing a tuning run with the stock MAF. As you can see the MAF% hits 100% When I am round 5000/5100 rpms and stays flatlined as the rpms continue to climb. Are you saying that the absolute numbers are still going up even though the % is staying at 100??
Oh and btw, for everyone interested the boot level at 100%maf was 6.7lbs
Attached Images  
victor25 is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:32 PM
  #85  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,049
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

That effectively makes it a SMAF..... by reducing the velocity of the air over the sensor elements.

Originally Posted by mark anderson
For what it's worth my race car uses a stock MAF that I have moved the guts into a larger diameter tube and I make 500 RWHP
John Speake is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:39 PM
  #86  
victor25
Rennlist Member
 
victor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan... Grand Rapids
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
The MAF % is the same scale as MAF Signal Absolute. i.e. 100% MAF signal = MAF signal absolute at 512, the bottom row of the fuel map

It is MAF volts on the screen that limits out at Vmaf = 5.2v when in fact there is still some headroom up to 6.1v by some clever tricks we use ..... and this higher volts corresponds to around 450CHP
OK, now we have the expert

So John, it sounds like you are saying that 100% or 5.2 volts in not 450chp? and that 6.1 is 450chp??? Hmmm by my calculations the 5.2 would only be about 385chp then
victor25 is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 06:51 PM
  #87  
John Speake
Rennlist Member
 
John Speake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cambridge England
Posts: 7,049
Received 35 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Sorry if I was not clear.
"MAF volts" on the screen display will start to hit max and limit at 5.2v (which may be 400HP) although other MAF processing circuits in the LH ECU work up to MAF = 6.1v.

But 100% = 6.1v = MAF signal absolute 512 at about 450HP crank.

The SMAF is good for over 800HP :-)
John Speake is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 07:18 PM
  #88  
victor25
Rennlist Member
 
victor25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Michigan... Grand Rapids
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by John Speake
Sorry if I was not clear.
"MAF volts" on the screen display will start to hit max and limit at 5.2v (which may be 400HP) although other MAF processing circuits in the LH ECU work up to MAF = 6.1v.

But 100% = 6.1v = MAF signal absolute 512 at about 450HP crank.

The SMAF is good for over 800HP :-)
Thanks John

As you can see from my plot, things go a bit wrong after after the MAF hits 100%, the LH doesnt know what to do, and I got knocks. The fuel % just kinda jumps around not knowing how much fuel to inject without the MAF. Really the only way to correctly handle this is with with one of Johns superMAFs, and click the box in your sharktuner for supermaf. You can also trick the MAF with something like the Murf doughnut.
The only temporary way I have found to handle this and continue to add more fuel is with the WOT map. At that point (100%maf) I started cranking in the fuel with the WOT map and it helped in that later runs with fuel ratio and knocks.
victor25 is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 07:20 PM
  #89  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Victor, since I have the 75mm pulley, does that mean I might be pushing 8lbs boost? I've not installed my gauges yet so I have no idea on actual.
SeanR is offline  
Old 09-25-2012, 07:21 PM
  #90  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark anderson
Greg wins
I agree, I've missed his contributions here, in whatever form they take
SeanR is offline  


Quick Reply: Rotrex Supercharger thread



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:05 AM.