Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Oil Pan Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2010, 08:59 PM
  #16  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Want proof.....here it is...... I have personally BLOWN 3 engines that used the stock S4 style oiling system...all showed low pressure in turns, especially left turns...most used amsoil too... Need more proof take a look at 944's on track....same crappy oiling issues there....I have personally seen a 944 vent the block and eject a piston that hit the back wall at Thunderhill!! Whats worse is the 928 blew its engine the next day!!

Countless others, 5 come to mind instantly, have blown engines on track.... including some custom built engines!!

While I agree there is significant oiling problems with the 928 engine.... MK and Scott are the only ones that can drive their 928's on track with stock oiling systems and NOT blow up..it should also be noted that there is not much time on Scott's racer either....he only attends a few races a year.... Another aspect is TIME on the engine....I have 35 hours on track on the Estate with the OB oil pan, with no indication of bearing damage....35 hours is probably two years of typical race weekends!

I only speak from my experience as I am NOT an engineer.....with the mods I did I never see under 50psi in any turn on track...even at very HOT oil temps...

Ideally a race car should run a dry sump....just like Anderson does......it all comes down to $$$
Old 11-01-2010, 09:02 PM
  #17  
Maleficio
Three Wheelin'
 
Maleficio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Amsoil kicks ***!
Old 11-01-2010, 10:10 PM
  #18  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Maleficio
Amsoil kicks ***!
I agree..but everything has it limits
Old 11-01-2010, 10:53 PM
  #19  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,655
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Want proof.....here it is......
"Proof" is more than a few data points.

There is no panacea. And it's certainly not an oil pickup change.
Old 11-01-2010, 11:04 PM
  #20  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GlenL
"Proof" is more than a few data points.

There is no panacea. And it's certainly not an oil pickup change.
Glen did blow an engine using the OB sump....but without the 3/8th pan spacer...I do wonder how important that is???

Oil level has to be important too....since even a slight reduction in oil level could make oil starvation much worse!! I do run the Estate with more than 10 quarts

Bottom line is there are 5 theories on how to make a 928 engine live on track:

1: Kibort theory...leave everything stock and run amsoil (I tried this)
2: Accusump theory....others have had good success with this
3: I-J scraper theory....with good results
4: My cheapo theory....OB pan + spacer....working very well so far
5: Dry sump......I don't think any have failed yet
Old 11-01-2010, 11:07 PM
  #21  
Maleficio
Three Wheelin'
 
Maleficio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always overfill by a quart.
Old 11-01-2010, 11:24 PM
  #22  
gbgastowers
Rennlist Member
 
gbgastowers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Holden Beach and Winston-Salem, North Carolina 82 928 Euro S 5spd MOSS GREEN/CHAMPAGNE-04 996 C4S CONV TIP POLAR SILVER/METROPOL BLUE
Posts: 2,514
Received 303 Likes on 173 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
There are a few parts

the Cloverleaf
the mesh screen
the spring loaded pickup tube...heres a pic
Is the wider rubber cup preferred over this thin one?(1980 vs 1982 Euro S with the 82 having the deeper cup.) Gunar
Old 11-02-2010, 12:42 AM
  #23  
S4ordie
Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Rennlist Member
 
S4ordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ, USA, Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 8,856
Received 335 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

pan spacer, OB pickup (lengthened to accommodate spacer thickness), GB windage tray on the mildly refreshed Zyclamrot engine (90 S4). Dipstick length left alone. Torco. We'll see how it does.

EDIT: I forgot it also has the mesh screen you show Brian

Last edited by S4ordie; 11-02-2010 at 04:28 AM.
Old 11-02-2010, 01:18 AM
  #24  
IcemanG17
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,271
Received 75 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by S4ordie
pan spacer, OB pickup (lengthened to accommodate spacer thickness), GB windage tray on the mildly refreshed Zyclamrot engine (90 S4). Dipstick length left alone. Torco. We'll see how it does.
it should be fine.....it takes pretty serious G forces for a period of time to expose the problem...for example T2 at Thunderhill is a 6-7 second long high G corner...typically 1.1-1.2g on street tires and over 1.5g on R comps!
Old 11-02-2010, 03:27 AM
  #25  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Lets see... hmmm, your 3 engines.
1. was suspect, coming from willowsprings abuse, and unknown shape, blew some rod bearings.

2. was run 3 -4 quarts low during an endurance event, and the oil in it at the time was some K-mart oil, because it was dripping out 1 quart every other lap.

3. was the widow, and we dont know what shape that engine was in.

Its funny, but when we narrow the variables down to . "I built the engine and know what the bearings looked like and what the clearances were, AND use amsoil, AND do a warm up routine to make sure all components are at temp before I start beating on it, suddenly, a guy like me can run over 5 engines with no issues over a 13 year period. Im running 1:59 laps at Thunderhill, and the estate is running 2:10s. big difference. Scot, sure, is running partial season this year, last year more than half and the year before that, most the entire season. His car is running well. Personally, I put it through 1/2 a season of racing in 1 weekend. No issues, engine running strong, no oil issues, lots of pressure.

I dont think anyone really knows what the issues are, but the oil pickup seems to be working for the estate so I do give the credit that it is working. dont know if it is any better, or if better is better for that component, but its good that you have a motor that is not blowing its rod bearings.

maybe its the mahle filter ?



Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Want proof.....here it is...... I have personally BLOWN 3 engines that used the stock S4 style oiling system...all showed low pressure in turns, especially left turns...most used amsoil too... Need more proof take a look at 944's on track....same crappy oiling issues there....I have personally seen a 944 vent the block and eject a piston that hit the back wall at Thunderhill!! Whats worse is the 928 blew its engine the next day!!

Countless others, 5 come to mind instantly, have blown engines on track.... including some custom built engines!!

While I agree there is significant oiling problems with the 928 engine.... MK and Scott are the only ones that can drive their 928's on track with stock oiling systems and NOT blow up..it should also be noted that there is not much time on Scott's racer either....he only attends a few races a year.... Another aspect is TIME on the engine....I have 35 hours on track on the Estate with the OB oil pan, with no indication of bearing damage....35 hours is probably two years of typical race weekends!

I only speak from my experience as I am NOT an engineer.....with the mods I did I never see under 50psi in any turn on track...even at very HOT oil temps...

Ideally a race car should run a dry sump....just like Anderson does......it all comes down to $$$
Old 11-02-2010, 09:56 AM
  #26  
GlenL
Nordschleife Master
 
GlenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Posts: 7,655
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by IcemanG17
Bottom line is there are 5 theories on how to make a 928 engine live on track:

1: Kibort theory...leave everything stock and run amsoil (I tried this)
2: Accusump theory....others have had good success with this
3: I-J scraper theory....with good results
4: My cheapo theory....OB pan + spacer....working very well so far
5: Dry sump......I don't think any have failed yet
I'm feeling thread fatigue on this one. (So much death!)

My engine grenade thread

An important factor, and the hardest to quantify, is driving style and the tracks themselves. If you tend towards short-shifting and run shorter, technical tracks then the engine lasts longer. This is not a "fact" but is something I've pieced together from people's reports.

Last edited by GlenL; 11-02-2010 at 10:16 AM.
Old 11-02-2010, 09:59 AM
  #27  
Droplink
Advanced
 
Droplink's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Maleficio
Amsoil kicks ***!
So does your avatar!
Old 11-02-2010, 12:47 PM
  #28  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

My theory is that its not the short shifting, as I dont short shift, shifting at near redline on every single shift for many years now.
I have all the races on video, so you can verify that.

these are mostly long fast tracks, some technical, but all have turns that are sweepers that over 3-6 seconds in length and very high G loading on the best of the R compounds.

so, my theory is that its a combination of things. poor warm up, short shifting (or being in the wrong gear) around turns so that the oil pressure DOES go down dramatically. I did a test on a pace car full course caution lap around some of the more demanding turns at half RPM, an RPM that many might shift iinto when they are in track mode, and trying to be "smooth" with hot oil, the oil pressure drops substantially. So, in a race or in an all out DE mode, if you are short shifting, or not having the RPM up in the 4500rpm range, min around the turns, and pulling substantial Gs, you could be damaging things due to oil starvation.

The funny thing here is NOONE posts video of themselves driving. lots of talk, no video or proof. I gurantee if we saw the videos of these failed engines. (not brians suspect engine, or one that was run 3 quarts low on Kmart oil) we could see some interesting aspects of the conditions that might lead to bearing failure.

I'll say it again, as I see it at the track often, warm up is critical. at the track, more often than not, boneheads are starting cold engines and reving them up like motorcycles at a stoplight to warm them up faster. there is no reason to think our 928 group is any different. If so, i suspect that doing that might harm our engines more than most others due to this weakness of design.
I dont believe in luck. I build engines, check tollerances, use the stock designs and race the 928 more often than anyone here. There is a logical reason why my engines have NOT had any problems. have not required any breathers, spacers, scrapers, accusumps, oil coolers, bumpsteer kits, chassis strenghtening bars, etc, and still run within 7% of the times of the worlds best drivers in a cup car at a track near you, ON real slicks, and its not luck.

one more thing Glen. Your engine was a euro and it had a scraper. I firmly believe that any of these contraptions, unless specifically approved by an autority, will restrict oil flow back into the sump, AND, dont forget, the early cars had the little tiny oil holes in the crank. I would not advise running any of the early cranks at the track because of this reason. huge difference in oiling design. 83 US cranks and newer only! (large oiling holes)



Originally Posted by GlenL
I'm feeling thread fatigue on this one. (So much death!)

My engine grenade thread

An important factor, and the hardest to quantify, is driving style and the tracks themselves. If you tend towards short-shifting and run shorter, technical tracks then the engine lasts longer. This is not a "fact" but is something I've pieced together from people's reports.
Old 11-02-2010, 01:04 PM
  #29  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Why dont you spend a lap with me on the video. tell me if Im short shifting.


Here is the difference in cranks for your review. certainly this is a MAJOR difference between all the engines Ive raced over 15 years of this stuff!



Mk

listen to the engine during the races. Here any short shifting here.

go to race 2 mid race after the track dried out , near 11:27 on the video and listen!

RACE 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrrH5H5kWCw


RACE 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jok3Wl4QcoE
Attached Images    

Last edited by mark kibort; 11-02-2010 at 01:29 PM.
Old 11-02-2010, 01:16 PM
  #30  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,952
Received 166 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

pay no attention to the mobil 1 banner on my car after the GTGP race. It was pulled off and washed in salt water after the event, to make sure no evil spirits remained on or near the car.


Quick Reply: Oil Pan Pics



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:45 AM.