Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Jag XKR Conv vs 04 911 conv

Old 10-12-2010, 03:08 PM
  #1  
FBIII
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
FBIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Jag XKR Conv vs 04 911 conv

My brother-in-law wants a 04 or 05 911 convertible. He's not really a car guy and he's in his early 60's. I'm wondering if he should look at an 07 Jag XKR convertible as well.
Old 10-12-2010, 03:20 PM
  #2  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,447
Received 2,068 Likes on 1,180 Posts
Default

I have a 97 XK8 Convertible in my garage right now, diagnosing a coil pack problem (165k miles on this one)

Great car, 290bhp for the non"R" version is still a fun ride.

Should probably post this in OT - get a more rounded out answer.

The 911 is going to be easier to get in & out of since the Jag sits a lot lower.
Old 10-12-2010, 03:28 PM
  #3  
Mark SF
Instructor
 
Mark SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, Santa Clara
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Chalk and cheese! The Jaguar for more of a grand tourer-style vehicle - softer ride, more comfort, but still with plenty of performance. The Porsche for more sportiness. Couldn't tell you which I'd go for, maybe both?
Old 10-12-2010, 03:30 PM
  #4  
polecat702
Vegas, Baby!
Rennlist Member


 
polecat702's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: far away
Posts: 11,535
Received 379 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

Given a choice, the 911 will be more reliable than the Jag.
Old 10-12-2010, 03:36 PM
  #5  
john bono
Rennlist Member
 
john bono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does the '04 jag suffer the timing chain problem that earlier years did?
Old 10-12-2010, 03:42 PM
  #6  
FBIII
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
FBIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Doylestown, PA
Posts: 1,481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The new Range Rovers and Range Rover Sport have the new Jag engine and surprisingly are supposed to be more reliable than the earlier BMW engined Rovers. That got me thinking that perhaps the new 07 and up Jags are now on a more even playing field with the 911's.
Old 10-12-2010, 03:50 PM
  #7  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,447
Received 2,068 Likes on 1,180 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by polecat702
Given a choice, the 911 will be more reliable than the Jag.
I'll remind my friend with the 45,000 mile 996 that needed new cams while it was on the lift next to the 165k mile Jag I'm working on

This Jaguar has needed nothing but routine maintenance over the past 10 years. Only left the owner (my mother) stranded once due to a faulty transmission selector switch.

Originally Posted by john bono
Does the '04 jag suffer the timing chain problem that earlier years did?
Did I mention the timing chains are original on this 97?
Old 10-12-2010, 04:03 PM
  #8  
Mark SF
Instructor
 
Mark SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, Santa Clara
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by john bono
Does the '04 jag suffer the timing chain problem that earlier years did?
No, it shouldn't. The problem was plastic secondary timing chain tensioners on pre-02 versions of the AJ8 engine. From 03 onwards it should have the all-metal versions.

Newer Jags are pretty reliable. My 01 XJ8 has been great.
Old 10-12-2010, 04:15 PM
  #9  
polecat702
Vegas, Baby!
Rennlist Member


 
polecat702's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: far away
Posts: 11,535
Received 379 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

I stand corrected. Jag's used to have major reliability issues, mostly electrical, and timing chains IIRC.
Old 10-12-2010, 04:59 PM
  #10  
Mark SF
Instructor
 
Mark SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, Santa Clara
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by polecat702
I stand corrected. Jag's used to have major reliability issues, mostly electrical, and timing chains IIRC.
I had a 1986 Series 3 XJ6, nothing electrical in that car worked when I bought it! Windows, sunroof, cruise, A/C, hazard lights, indicators, ALL the instruments, interior lights, wipers, washers, stereo, fuel tank changeover, alternator, starter, you name it it didn't work! The only thing working were the headlights & taillights.

Lucas could even make fuses that don't conduct electricity! (but test OK with a meter...)

The first thing Ford did was kick out Lucas. From the X300 (1994) onwards Jaguars have been pretty reliable.
Old 10-12-2010, 05:01 PM
  #11  
Mark SF
Instructor
 
Mark SF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area, Santa Clara
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mark SF
Chalk and cheese! The Jaguar for more of a grand tourer-style vehicle - softer ride, more comfort, but still with plenty of performance. The Porsche for more sportiness. Couldn't tell you which I'd go for, maybe both?
Of course, the one car that's somewhere in between the two is.... the 928
Old 10-12-2010, 05:05 PM
  #12  
jsherid1
Three Wheelin'
 
jsherid1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The Jag should be quite reliable, I have been driving my 2005 XJ8L for three years now and have had only a few issues and the problems are generally less expensive to fix on the Jag as well if you have a good independent shop.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Jag XKR Conv vs 04 911 conv



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:22 AM.