Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Not understanding Toe-in vs trammlining- results posted

Old 09-27-2010, 12:46 AM
  #16  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

But Kibort's way is perfect......for Kibort I take mine to a bodyshop guy with the $$$$$ machine as I want to get caster around 6 degrees. He check it after I change the upper A-arm and had the lower ball joint adjusters undone. Charged $20 since it checked out as I wanted it 3 1/2 to 4 negative camber. He knows to not lift the car and rolls it back and forth off the pads if he has to adjust anything.
Old 09-27-2010, 02:10 AM
  #17  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

I'm sure it's perfect for mark, but that doesn't suggest that it might be even minimally acceptable for anyone else. For an adjustment that is easily responsble for the way a car gets around the track fast or slow, I'm constantly amazed that Mark proposes doing it the way he does. It's better than the calibrated-eyeball sighting from the doorhandle, but barely.
Old 09-27-2010, 02:15 AM
  #18  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,696
Received 663 Likes on 540 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jeff spahn

My tires are feathering on the outer edge, which from my reading tells me I have a toe-in issue from my most recent alignment.

Car trammlines like crazy. I can't yet get my head around the values/settings to eliminate the trammlining.

So my question is, how does toe-in relate to trammlining.

I am running factory spec sizes for the 16" tires (found some 45 sidewall tires!).
Jeff,

When you say "you found some 45 sidewall tires" what exactly do you mean? Presumably you mean that you found a shop somewhere that had them in stock and not on a scrap heap!

Do you know how old they are and did you find two of these for the rear wheels or "4 of them". I presume you are talking about a 245x45x16 section. Did you fit two of these on the front wheel rims by any chance or did you stick with stock 225x50x16 on the front wheels? A stock front rim probably would not like a 245 section on it but then your tire shop shouldahe pointed that out to you as they fitted them- apologies for the question but this is just elimination of the possibilites I see.

WRT to alignment all kinds of weird and wonderful things can be done at home but there are so many quid pro quo's that unless you are really very competent [and patient] and have the turnplates, a completely flat surfaces, 4 pairs of hands, the patience of Jobe and can crawl and work under a 5 inch gap beneath the car then it is probably not worth it.

Clearly you understand the importance of having the car settled but unless you know and trust the alignment shop implicitly never leave the car with them to do the job in your absence. Always watch what they are doing and tell them specifically what alignment settings you want within the allowable range [or even outside the range] and probably most important of all, ensure the settings are very accurately balanced side to side and well within the tolerance range specified in the WSM. Alignment shops may well try to fob you off with something that is "permissible" if they have a queue of cars on the ramp as fine tuning generally takes iterative steps.

Cars with widish tires have a tendency to tramline anyway and particularly so on raised road markings and there is probably nothing that can be done about that but I would not describe the 928 behaviour as "crazy" so clearly something not right.

I run 265 fronts with 2 degrees camber and minimal toe in and I have no problems of this kind. If the tire sizes are OK, your alignment OK then look for a tire fauly or some kind of compatibility issue- a laser alignment shop should be able to tell you if you have any slop in your steering system linkages- dodgy rack mounting bushes not so sure of that one but they would probably see soemthing.

Feathering on the outer edges can be caused by inaccurate toe setting [and if the car was aligned at incorrect height then the wheels will toe out as the car settles- no doubt about that]. With little or zero toe the car will feel very "nervous" and turn in like a demon but I would not call this tramlining.

Do not forget that wear on the outlet edge can also be caused by agressive cornering !

Regards

Fred R
Old 09-27-2010, 02:53 AM
  #19  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
Jeff,

Feathering on the outer edges can be caused by inaccurate toe setting [and if the car was aligned at incorrect height then the wheels will toe out as the car settles- no doubt about that]. With little or zero toe the car will feel very "nervous" and turn in like a demon but I would not call this tramlining.

Do not forget that wear on the outlet edge can also be caused by agressive cornering !

Regards

Fred R

I may be being a dunce here.

At the correct ride height the tie rods are parallel to the ground ?
Thus if the car is aligned at the wrong ride height (normally too high because it has been lifted and not allowed to settle) The tie rods will be angled down from rack to hub carrier while it is being aligned.

As the car settles the tie rods will become parallel to the ground again and the horizontal distance between the joint on the rack and the ball joint on the steering arm increases.

This pushes the rear of the wheel further out because the steering arm where the tie rods connect is on the rear of the hub. This causes more toe in not toe out.
Old 09-27-2010, 03:47 AM
  #20  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Hey, it is surprisingly accurate. when it comes to toe and camber, im very close to what the machine prints out. I have compared my settings the day I did the hunter, and I told the guy my settings. when it was measured with the lasers, it was near right on to my settings. well within specs, but actually much better. near MY specs!!

why do you think its not accurate? a magic marker against the level on the ground is pretty solid. its not the width of the marker its the side that hits the level that is repeatable. lke I said, a spray can would do the same job as a marker.


Originally Posted by dr bob
I'm sure it's perfect for mark, but that doesn't suggest that it might be even minimally acceptable for anyone else. For an adjustment that is easily responsble for the way a car gets around the track fast or slow, I'm constantly amazed that Mark proposes doing it the way he does. It's better than the calibrated-eyeball sighting from the doorhandle, but barely.
Old 09-27-2010, 03:54 AM
  #21  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dr bob
Jon--

That's been part of the ongoing discussion about Mark's method. There's no consideration for sidewall swell, bulges, raised writing, etc.

I did my last alignmnent check with a laser fixture instead of the straight-edge, set up to go against the wheel rather than the tire. Marks on the floor 42" fore and aft of the wheel center, shoot both from both wheels, measure with a tape measure. 3/8" to 1/2" difference is perfect toe-in. You can do the same thing with a straight-edge I guess. Laser pointers are cheap.
actually, if the tire is involved, as long as it is the same on both sides it wont matter. my car tires use only the rim surface and you can use spacers to counteract a bulging tire.

Originally Posted by jon928se
When toe is measured as a distance ie 1/16" or 1.5mm say where is 1/16" measured on the wheel/tyre ?

Is it at the perimeter of the tyre, the perimeter of the rim ? or somewhere else esoteric

The reason I ask is my local alignment shop has a Beissbarth 4 wheel alignment rack that brings up the specs and measurements for toe in millimetres but all other measurements in degrees.
picture using the straightedge, straight down from the front of the tire and wheel area and the rear . the marks are about 18" apart. (almost straight down, but slightly angled forward using the straightedge. then the 71" is the distance the front of the tires are apart from each other. the rears , if they are 71.25" means you have .25" of toe in. its very easy to detect a gross problem with toe. when i got hit at sears point last year, I was toed in .75" . just the drive home carved out some tread on the outer 3rd. when I adjusted it on that siide to be 1/16" toed in, it was perfect. I also did this when i changed tie rods. no issues. on the machine, after 7 years of not being on a machine, it as just as I wanted it, and measured it.

Originally Posted by jon928se
It's a function of the length of the straightedge he used - I'm guessing something about 50" long - placed against tire with approx 20" sticking out to the rear then with approx 20" sticking out to the front.

Thinking about it it would be better to use a staightedge with a couple of spacers to press against the wheel not the tyre. In fact it doesn't even have to be straight so long as the same part of the edge is always pressed against the wheel or to put it another way so long as the offset between where it touches the wheel and where it touches the ground is constant.
Old 09-27-2010, 03:56 AM
  #22  
FredR
Rennlist Member
 
FredR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oman
Posts: 9,696
Received 663 Likes on 540 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jon928se
I may be being a dunce here.


This pushes the rear of the wheel further out because the steering arm where the tie rods connect is on the rear of the hub. This causes more toe in not toe out.
Hi John,

Clearly one of us is a bit of a dunce here and I most certainly would not discount myself!

When the 928 settles the camber increases and the spacial distance between tie rod end connections needs to increase to retain the same toe setting. The tie rod length itelf is fixed thus it pulls on the back side of the wheel and the result is a toe out effect. If one is lucky the car will go to neutral toe but if you have spent time on an alignment rig you will know that if you increase camber ythis de-facto reduces toe quite markedly and thus need to correct.


I'm pretty confident that what I say is correct but stand to be corrected if I am wrong.

Maybe things work differently in down under land like the vortex in your bath tub spinning the other way compared to up here land. !

Best wishes

Fred

Best wishes
Old 09-27-2010, 04:31 AM
  #23  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
Hi John,

Clearly one of us is a bit of a dunce here and I most certainly would not discount myself!

When the 928 settles the camber increases and the spacial distance between tie rod end connections needs to increase to retain the same toe setting. The tie rod length itelf is fixed thus it pulls on the back side of the wheel and the result is a toe out effect. If one is lucky the car will go to neutral toe but if you have spent time on an alignment rig you will know that if you increase camber ythis de-facto reduces toe quite markedly and thus need to correct.


I'm pretty confident that what I say is correct but stand to be corrected if I am wrong.

Maybe things work differently in down under land like the vortex in your bath tub spinning the other way compared to up here land. !

Best wishes

Fred

Best wishes
DOH.

Thanks Fred.

I forgot all about the fact that the upper and lower a arms also should be parallel-ish to the ground at the correct ride height. Because they operate over a shorter radius than the tie rods, they push the wheel further out as the car settles than the tie rod does - hence the net effect is to induce toe out.

My initial example would only be true on something like a Morgan with sliding pillar suspension.
Old 09-27-2010, 05:50 AM
  #24  
jon928se
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jon928se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney AUS
Posts: 2,608
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
actually, if the tire is involved, as long as it is the same on both sides it wont matter. my car tires use only the rim surface and you can use spacers to counteract a bulging tire.

Did you mean my straight edge only touches the rim surface ?

picture using the straightedge, straight down from the front of the tire and wheel area and the rear . the marks are about 18" apart. (almost straight down, but slightly angled forward using the straightedge. then the 71" is the distance the front of the tires are apart from each other. the rears , if they are 71.25" means you have .25" of toe in. its very easy to detect a gross problem with toe. when i got hit at sears point last year, I was toed in .75" . just the drive home carved out some tread on the outer 3rd. when I adjusted it on that siide to be 1/16" toed in, it was perfect. I also did this when i changed tie rods. no issues. on the machine, after 7 years of not being on a machine, it as just as I wanted it, and measured it.
I get it - you have the straigthedge vertical so the longitudinal marks on the floor are somewhere between 18 and 25" apart. And your measurement of 1/16" total toe is an at an arbitary but repeatable measuring place on the tyre/rim that you know translates to a toe angle that works for you.

It doesn't answer the question about the Beissbarth machine - where is there figure of Xmm of toe actually measured

I thought you meant this


Also in the diagram I show a more accurate way of measuring as I tried to describe in my earlier post. Total toe is just INVTAN ((71.75-70.25)/65)

Numbers chosen at random.
Old 09-27-2010, 10:13 AM
  #25  
jeff spahn
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
jeff spahn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dubuque, IA
Posts: 8,592
Received 382 Likes on 220 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FredR
Jeff,

When you say "you found some 45 sidewall tires" what exactly do you mean? Presumably you mean that you found a shop somewhere that had them in stock and not on a scrap heap!
Fred- Found as in they are hard to find new and this shop sells them new. Just not in Goodyear or Michelin. Had to go with an off brand and wait for a bit for delivery.

Originally Posted by FredR
Do you know how old they are and did you find two of these for the rear wheels or "4 of them". I presume you are talking about a 245x45x16 section. Did you fit two of these on the front wheel rims by any chance or did you stick with stock 225x50x16 on the front wheels? A stock front rim probably would not like a 245 section on it but then your tire shop shouldahe pointed that out to you as they fitted them- apologies for the question but this is just elimination of the possibilites I see.
The tires are now stock size from the factory. 225/50/16 in front. 245/45/16 in rear.

Originally Posted by FredR
WRT to alignment all kinds of weird and wonderful things can be done at home but there are so many quid pro quo's that unless you are really very competent [and patient] and have the turnplates, a completely flat surfaces, 4 pairs of hands, the patience of Jobe and can crawl and work under a 5 inch gap beneath the car then it is probably not worth it.

Clearly you understand the importance of having the car settled but unless you know and trust the alignment shop implicitly never leave the car with them to do the job in your absence. Always watch what they are doing and tell them specifically what alignment settings you want within the allowable range [or even outside the range] and probably most important of all, ensure the settings are very accurately balanced side to side and well within the tolerance range specified in the WSM. Alignment shops may well try to fob you off with something that is "permissible" if they have a queue of cars on the ramp as fine tuning generally takes iterative steps.
Car is never lifted before or during the alignment process. They are the only place in town I could get to understand the requirement of the 928 to remain unlifted. They get the bushing issues and why it won't settle. Last time I went in they spent 2 hours aligning the car.


Originally Posted by FredR
Regards

Fred R
Thanks
Old 09-27-2010, 11:43 AM
  #26  
Larry Velk
Instructor
 
Larry Velk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Berlin, WI
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I started a geometry tutorial some time ago - here are some diagrams as examples of what can go wrong...
Some stuff is missing as reference to the letters is in the text.
As far as using string and such, I've seen Formula 5000 cars aligned this way at Elkhart Lake in the 70's and I've done my cars like that before I made the fancy set ups. The rig we had at the Chevy garage back in the 70's/80's was not as good as a craftsman with a ruler if you ask me.
Attached Images  
Old 09-27-2010, 11:51 AM
  #27  
Bob Rouleau

Still plays with cars.
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bob Rouleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 15,078
Received 255 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

Jeff,

I claim no expertise on the 928, I'm a 911 guy. So your car may be different. My experience is that wear on the outside edge of a tire is caused by TOE-OUT. A car with enough toe-out to cause premature wear will have unstable steering and tram lining is a virtual sure thing.

Cars with excess toe-in wear the inside edges of the tires (at least on any 911 I've owned) and toe in gives the car more straight line stability. Toe-out tends to reduce under-steer at the expense of straight line stability.

Maybe the 928 behaves differently but I doubt it.

Best,
Old 09-27-2010, 12:51 PM
  #28  
dr bob
Chronic Tool Dropper
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dr bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 20,506
Received 545 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Toe out on the 928 chews the inside ribs. These cars are way less driving-sensitive to toe errors v 911.
Old 09-27-2010, 03:47 PM
  #29  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

this is actually an advantage i have found. as the suspension compresses with huge bump steer, more toe out occurs. it desentitizes steering, and the opposite wheel scrubs alittle under droop. (toes in) But, with a competition suspension or performance shock set up, its not bad at all because droop is not much. i bet my car is at stock ride hight under full droop.

Originally Posted by jon928se
DOH.

Thanks Fred.

I forgot all about the fact that the upper and lower a arms also should be parallel-ish to the ground at the correct ride height. Because they operate over a shorter radius than the tie rods, they push the wheel further out as the car settles than the tie rod does - hence the net effect is to induce toe out.

My initial example would only be true on something like a Morgan with sliding pillar suspension.
Old 09-27-2010, 03:53 PM
  #30  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

this is certainly not true on all cars I have worked on racing and street cars. toe in is clearly outside edge of the tire, toe out is inside tire wear. like I said, with 1/2" of toe in after a hit, my race tires were skinned clean on the way home from sears. toeed the car back out to 0 and the wear stopped. toe in issues, have worn the inner 1/3rd of the tire, stopped with a slight amount of toe in. I do agree, with toe in, its a little more stable in a straight line and dont know why that is. any unloaded wheel will give the other side a sterring effect to the extent of the toe in or out. (when you hit a bump on one side, etc)


Originally Posted by Bob Rouleau
Jeff,

I claim no expertise on the 928, I'm a 911 guy. So your car may be different. My experience is that wear on the outside edge of a tire is caused by TOE-OUT. A car with enough toe-out to cause premature wear will have unstable steering and tram lining is a virtual sure thing.

Cars with excess toe-in wear the inside edges of the tires (at least on any 911 I've owned) and toe in gives the car more straight line stability. Toe-out tends to reduce under-steer at the expense of straight line stability.

Maybe the 928 behaves differently but I doubt it.

Best,

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Not understanding Toe-in vs trammlining- results posted



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:25 PM.