Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Premature Timing Belt Failure - Solved

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-01-2010, 09:58 AM
  #16  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 27,891
Received 2,251 Likes on 1,245 Posts
Default

the reason i was suggesting to use a slightly lower tension is that the early tensioners seem to have less give.
IE they dont relax as much as the later style tensioners do because the bellvile washers dont have as much dish.

That said putting the tension at the high side of the kemp tool may cause the belt to be come overtensioned when the engine expands to the running condiditon, this would then wear the belt out quickly as well as wear out the gears and possibly damage the oil pump.

I would suggest to replace all the gears in the belt run with the new style rebuild the tensioner, fill it with oil, check the oil pump shaft for visible play, replace all of the cam tower front seals, as well as the oil pump O ring and front main seal , new pivot bolt and bushings and a new belt roller.
This should ensure that your belt drive will be worry free for atleast the next 7 years
Old 09-01-2010, 11:13 AM
  #17  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 356 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

I've had good luck rebuilding and using the stock tensioners.
Now I even have a spare ready to allow a quick swap, perhaps on the next 928 that rolls my way.
Old 09-01-2010, 01:00 PM
  #18  
Gordak
Advanced
 
Gordak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Fairfield CT USA
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I usually order a used oil pump sprocket if its the first time I've done a belt on a car, I dont even look at the original first, I just assume its going to be pretty worn. If It turns out it doesnt need it, I keep in on hand for the next one.

I noticed the official shop manual says go to "8" with the (twist style) tension tool but doesnt really explain that it's the early style tool, and ofcoarse 5 or 5.5 is the tension with the later special tension tool.
One could mistakenly assume early cars need to read "8" on the special tool!! waay too tight.
Old 09-01-2010, 02:03 PM
  #19  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ROG100
I would never want to argue with Mr Brown 8>) however you will find that your all your four gears are steel and hard to wear out (unless they have already been replaced). Unlike the later aluminum cam and oil pump gears.
On my early cars pre 83 I have stayed with the earlier design of belt and had no problems. If you are going to track the car take Mr. Merlin’s advice and upgrade.
Actually, this is only partially correct. By 1982, all of the square tooth cam gears were aluminum and all of the replacement gears, from Porsche were also aluminum. Indeed, the oil pump gears for the square tooth belt cams came in steel, for the 1982 vehicles.

I'm not sure exactly where they changed from steel to aluminum, but I thought it was 1981. Someone on Rennlist will know the answer.
__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!





Old 09-01-2010, 02:10 PM
  #20  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ethre

I know the two camshaft gears have been replaced (1998), but the replacement gears are listed as the square-toothed versions. One of the idler rollers seems to have been replaced with a 85-86 version though. Verifying this has just gone to the top of my list though.

I have no mention of the crankshaft gear being changed though - so (even if it somehow is in good condition) this sounds like something that to do asap.
Now you need to be really careful. I've seen many engines that have had the cam gears changed and ended up with the round tooth design cam gears, while still retaining the square tooth oil pump and crank gear. I've seen both round tooth and square tooth belts on these engines, too.

The wear on the crank gear will probably determine what you do, in regards to changing the other gears. The square tooth cam gear is NLA and you can only buy this gear (new) in the round tooth design. 928 International usually has used square tooth crank gears...although they might not be much better than yours.
Old 09-01-2010, 02:14 PM
  #21  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
also consider to run the belt at the lower end of the Kempf tool window
While I do not have, not have I ever used the Kempf tool, this is probably good advice. The factory spec for belt tightness (with the 9201 tool), on your early engine, is 4.5 and the specification for the later design 4 valve engines is 5.0. This is quite a bit less tension.
Old 09-01-2010, 02:15 PM
  #22  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gordak
I usually order a used oil pump sprocket if its the first time I've done a belt on a car, I dont even look at the original first, I just assume its going to be pretty worn. If It turns out it doesnt need it, I keep in on hand for the next one.

I noticed the official shop manual says go to "8" with the (twist style) tension tool but doesnt really explain that it's the early style tool, and ofcoarse 5 or 5.5 is the tension with the later special tension tool.
One could mistakenly assume early cars need to read "8" on the special tool!! waay too tight.
5.0 to 5.5 is way too tight. See my post above.
Old 09-01-2010, 03:04 PM
  #23  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 830 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Greg,
The change in tooth design happened in 82 when the cam gears went from 928 105 545 04 to 545 10.
The early cam gears are still available and we have them in stock.
Same for the early oil pump gear 928 107 107 04 which like the early cam gears are steel.
Only part NLA is the early crank gear.
Roger
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 09-01-2010, 05:14 PM
  #24  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,452 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=ROG100;7863293]Greg,
The change in tooth design happened in 82 when the cam gears went from 928 105 545 04 to 545 10.
The early cam gears are still available and we have them in stock.
Same for the early oil pump gear 928 107 107 04 which like the early cam gears are steel.
Only part NLA is the early crank gear.
Roger[/QUOTE

That makes sense.

Since the steel crank gear would wear twice as much as the steel cam gears, tough to imagine anyone ever needing replacement steel cam gears? If you can't get a decent crank gear, replacing the cam gears seems like it would be futile.

Whenever I get a car with worn gears, I convert everything to the later design round tooth design.

So, since this particular person has an '82, he should have aluminum cam gears, no?
Old 09-01-2010, 09:46 PM
  #25  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 830 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Greg,
The change from steel square tooth to Aluminium round tooth happened in 82. This normally related to the production of 83 MY cars which started in August/September 82 after the Summer vacation.
All my pre 83 cars (7) had reusable old design square tooth gears and they stay that way.
Upgrading is very expensive to some users if the original equipment is servicable. If worn then that is another issue especially if the crank gear is worn. However for those financially challenged a good used gear from Mark would be an OK option.
Not all owners can make the upgrade and providing the original equipment is servicable this is an OK option.
Roger
Old 09-01-2010, 11:33 PM
  #26  
Ethre
Pro
Thread Starter
 
Ethre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 3rd Rock From The Sun
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Again, thank you all for your input. Lets see if I can get to everything in one post.
(Also, since the car's not infront of me right now, I will try to minimize any assumptions regarding condition of parts)

The belts were changed by the previous owner, and according to the receipts he purchased the tension tool. However, hearing the word "ancient" used to describe the timing belt makes me think something doesn't add up.

The two camshaft gears were changed, but that was ~12 years and 40000(?) miles ago. The parts numbers (if my memory serves me) match the square toothed gears, so all gears should hopefully be the same style(unless there were changes for which I do not have reciepts). That said, the crank gear hasn't been replaced, so this could (and may likely be) worn/damaged/burred.

Could gear wear on a loose belt (if the previous owner hadn't known to retension it) have caused enough damage to the belt to make it appear old? Perhaps this could have been aggravated by initial over-tension (as Greg mentioned)?

Of course, this is all a synthesis of reciepts, telephone talks with mechanic, and memory. Hopefully I should be getting a running car back to tinker with by this weekend.

P.S. I am sure I will get to know you very well Roger.
Old 09-01-2010, 11:38 PM
  #27  
blown 87
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
blown 87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bird lover in Sharpsburg
Posts: 9,903
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ethre
Hopefully I should be getting a running car back to tinker with by this weekend.
If you are paying a pro wrench to repair this problem, the very last thing you want to do it is tinker with it.

My $0.02
Old 09-01-2010, 11:49 PM
  #28  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 27,891
Received 2,251 Likes on 1,245 Posts
Default

it would be nice if your mechanic could shoot some pictures then post them here.
This is a customers car 83 with a broken cams and pulley.
This was one of the dirtiest engines i have ever seen or worked on.
Note the worn aluminum oil pump gear it was a round tooth version
Attached Images     
Old 09-01-2010, 11:50 PM
  #29  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 356 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

How many pro wrenches really are?

How much is a flatbed to Sharpsburg?
Old 09-01-2010, 11:51 PM
  #30  
Landseer
Rennlist Member
 
Landseer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 12,143
Received 356 Likes on 205 Posts
Default

Or Aurora?


Quick Reply: Premature Timing Belt Failure - Solved



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:26 AM.