Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

A Couple of Questions Regarding Megasquirt, Crank Trigger and MAF vs. MAP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2010, 09:00 PM
  #16  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 153BigBlock
Also, would Mike Simard's flywheel replace the need to do any flywheel modifications and could I run it with the stock clutch system? If not, are the parts to do the custom flywheel setup readily available? Also, would the 36-1 ring undo the necessity for flywheel changes on the dual disc system? I see diyautotune sells them for reasonable amounts.
You just call Mike Simard up and say " I want your lightweight flywheel" and he sends a pretty one that looks like this:

http://www.simardracing.com/Flywheel.html

Then you don't use anything in the stock system - and the replacement parts are all just in the tilton catalog. Boom - done.

Yes, the 36-1 on the front would allow you to just run-what-you-brung on the clutch side.
Old 06-10-2010, 09:04 PM
  #17  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 153BigBlock
The tech at diyautotune suggested the following hookup for Ign: Usually you would just jumper the wires on the EZK so you feed the EZK's crank signal to the MS and send the ignition signals from the MS straight to the coils.

Thoughts? Thank you.
Part of the awesomeness of using the aftermarket EFI stuff is the ability to ditch all those redonkulous wires and coils and caps from the engine space.
Old 06-10-2010, 09:04 PM
  #18  
wildwestsydney
Racer
 
wildwestsydney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: south shore MA
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did not do anything with my flywheel set up due to the fact that I am feeding ms the ignition signal from the EZF, I have not messed with the oem ignition other than to tap it for the ignition pulse that ms needs to do it's thing.

Sam
Old 06-10-2010, 09:21 PM
  #19  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BC
You just call Mike Simard up and say " I want your lightweight flywheel" and he sends a pretty one that looks like this:

http://www.simardracing.com/Flywheel.html

Then you don't use anything in the stock system - and the replacement parts are all just in the tilton catalog. Boom - done.

Yes, the 36-1 on the front would allow you to just run-what-you-brung on the clutch side.
All good stuff. That flywheel is pure jewelry. Maybe after I pay off the S4 motor .

Originally Posted by BC
Part of the awesomeness of using the aftermarket EFI stuff is the ability to ditch all those redonkulous wires and coils and caps from the engine space.
This post is worthless without pics

Originally Posted by wildwestsydney
I did not do anything with my flywheel set up due to the fact that I am feeding ms the ignition signal from the EZF, I have not messed with the oem ignition other than to tap it for the ignition pulse that ms needs to do it's thing.

Sam
This might be the way to get started for me too. Thank you.
Old 06-10-2010, 10:14 PM
  #20  
James Bailey
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
James Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 18,061
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Has anyone running M S on a 928 passed the California rolling emissions tests ?? I really do not know..How about Mustang guys ?
Old 06-10-2010, 10:25 PM
  #21  
zoltan944
Three Wheelin'
 
zoltan944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego / Las Vegas
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Michael, I would recommend either sending your crank pully out to say, Colin for the 36 tooth or order the predone flywheel. You will just need to figure out whether you want the single or dual clutch setup.

As far as smog is concerned, nothing will end up looking abnormal, and the sniffer portion will be handled via cats and tuning.
Otherwise, I will have him register it in Nevada using my address
Old 06-10-2010, 10:25 PM
  #22  
BC
Rennlist Member
 
BC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25,132
Received 72 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

If you can keep it stock looking, I think it would pass. They don't look at the computer.
Old 06-10-2010, 10:39 PM
  #23  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by James Bailey
Has anyone running M S on a 928 passed the California rolling emissions tests ?? I really do not know..How about Mustang guys ?
His word meaningful to me, the gentleman who sold me the motor has done quite a few of these and 944 variant swaps/ecu changes with no problems.

Originally Posted by zoltan944
Michael, I would recommend either sending your crank pully out to say, Colin for the 36 tooth or order the predone flywheel. You will just need to figure out whether you want the single or dual clutch setup.



As far as smog is concerned, nothing will end up looking abnormal, and the sniffer portion will be handled via cats and tuning.
Otherwise, I will have him register it in Nevada using my address
Thanks Sean I hope it does not come to that.

I want dual since that is what I already have and want to get max use out of it. So, I take it you don't like the DIYautotune guys suggestion to tap into the EZK for ignition?

I will send a PM to Colin re: His ideas and services.

Originally Posted by BC
If you can keep it stock looking, I think it would pass. They don't look at the computer.
This is my thinking. Colin also says it can be done totally stock looking.

I need to do a complete budget for the project and pick a combination of best practices and bang for my buck. To that end, I am getting so much valuable information and suggestion here. I really appreciate it.
Old 06-10-2010, 10:57 PM
  #24  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,417
Received 182 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Some pics of my conversion...





and the album with a few more..
http://s252.photobucket.com/albums/h...%20conversion/
Old 06-11-2010, 12:12 AM
  #25  
zoltan944
Three Wheelin'
 
zoltan944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego / Las Vegas
Posts: 1,813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 153BigBlock
Thanks Sean I hope it does not come to that.

I want dual since that is what I already have and want to get max use out of it. So, I take it you don't like the DIYautotune guys suggestion to tap into the EZK for ignition?

I will send a PM to Colin re: His ideas and services.
Okay, I reread the entire thread and see I skipped over that whole thing. If that works then that would be nice to skip over that part of installation.

What did they say about a harness? I think Colin mentioned he could make one if they couldn't. It would take alot of my time down there to solder and run wire to make the harness and would be worth the money for DIY or Colin to have one for us ready to go.
Old 06-11-2010, 03:11 PM
  #26  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Okay, I am about to place my order for the MSII. They said it will be a custom unit. So, I need to have my ducks in a row.

Besides fuel and ignition, what else will the box be controlling? I now know I need GM versions of AIT and CLT (not necessary but better). Does anyone have a part number on a TPS that will be a potentiometer style that I can use in place of stock? Anything else before I pull the crank trigger? What is the flappy? For now, I am going to go with a tap into the existing EZK wiring system for ignition pulse and add improvements down the road. Thanks.
Old 06-11-2010, 03:35 PM
  #27  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,417
Received 182 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

flappy is the inductive tuning flap inside the intake on S4 engines. It changes the resonance of the intake so there are two torque peaks (Helmholzt effect). The existing brains use a combination of load and rpm to activate it...typically at 3200 ish rpm, and then off at 5500 (I think). The MS can run it by controlling the electrical connector that normals actuates it (two pole connection). A simple turn on at 3200 rpm works for me..
Old 06-11-2010, 04:15 PM
  #28  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
flappy is the inductive tuning flap inside the intake on S4 engines. It changes the resonance of the intake so there are two torque peaks (Helmholzt effect). The existing brains use a combination of load and rpm to activate it...typically at 3200 ish rpm, and then off at 5500 (I think). The MS can run it by controlling the electrical connector that normals actuates it (two pole connection). A simple turn on at 3200 rpm works for me..
Thanks Tom. Any other items the box controls on the S4?

I see you are getting solid horsepower above stock. Is that directly attributable to your ability to tune the motor or are there other trick bits in your set-up?
Old 06-11-2010, 05:14 PM
  #29  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,417
Received 182 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

I talked to Louie Ott about the power increase from stock to MS (295 rwhp to 330rwhp) and he figured it was the ign advance and I think the EDIS 8 with large gap plugs probably helped. I still have some tuning to do (took Colin's base map from his 86 engine) and spent about an hour with a local dyno guy (no longer here unfortunately) to smooth out some of the transitions. I'm still learning the tuning aspect and have been playing with it more after recording some runs at our last track event.

Keep in mind you won't have knock control at this point..but it is adaptable to the MS.. I may do this down the road...
Old 06-11-2010, 05:22 PM
  #30  
UncleMaz
Nordschleife Master
Thread Starter
 
UncleMaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 8,004
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
I talked to Louie Ott about the power increase from stock to MS (295 rwhp to 330rwhp) and he figured it was the ign advance and I think the EDIS 8 with large gap plugs probably helped. I still have some tuning to do (took Colin's base map from his 86 engine) and spent about an hour with a local dyno guy (no longer here unfortunately) to smooth out some of the transitions. I'm still learning the tuning aspect and have been playing with it more after recording some runs at our last track event.

Keep in mind you won't have knock control at this point..but it is adaptable to the MS.. I may do this down the road...
Thanks Tom. Also, thanks for the PM.

Does an S4 stock engine management have knock control? Is knock control something I should have specifically built into the MS at this point? What is involved to adapt to it on the S4? Thanks again.


Quick Reply: A Couple of Questions Regarding Megasquirt, Crank Trigger and MAF vs. MAP



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:54 AM.