Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New Product: Header-X Pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2008, 01:10 PM
  #16  
Avve
Track Day
 
Avve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After having a closer look at my exhaust system (1986 Euro 16V) I realize that it consists of no cats, both pipes go into a large central muffler, then two pipes exit widely to each side into a rather large resonator before both pipes join into the rear muffler. The pipes are (physically) more separated than the US 85-86 but not "true" duals" all the way.
The future combo headers + x-pipe + large resonators mean that I may have to keep some sort of rear mufflers, perhaps ending it all with a pair of SuperTrapps!?
The weight has to be kept as low as possible. This is meant to be a race-car with plates (and of course I need all the power I can get)
Old 07-23-2008, 02:38 PM
  #17  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

What would be the better fit for me--do I do a Header x-pipe with cats and rmb or stick with regular x-pipe, no cats and rmb???
The good news is that the system is modular. Start with the RMB only. See what it sounds like. Its pretty mild and sounds good.

If you want more HP and can stand a little louder note, add the Header-x and remove the cats.

If you still want more HP, then add our hi-flow resonators/dual exhaust as the last step.
Attached Images   
Old 07-25-2008, 02:13 PM
  #18  
Manfred
Pro
 
Manfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for your input Carl.
Old 07-25-2008, 02:15 PM
  #19  
Manfred
Pro
 
Manfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Carl, as a second thought, not sure if I was clear earlier, but what I'm really going for is the most HP increase with the least sound increase; does that change your recommendation? Thanks, Dan ('91GT with stock exhaust)
Old 07-25-2008, 02:37 PM
  #20  
The_Remora
Pro
 
The_Remora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone have a chance to compare this header/x-pipe combo against a standard ott/motorsport x-pipe? would be interesting to see the difference or how much more power it can produce.
Old 07-25-2008, 04:22 PM
  #21  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Carl,

Any concers for only sampling one bank with the O2 and not both?

Looks good!
Old 07-25-2008, 04:35 PM
  #22  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,453
Received 2,072 Likes on 1,183 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Imo000
Any concers for only sampling one bank with the O2 and not both?
Most 928's running headers have been doing that since day one, no issues to speak of.
I haven't seen very many who went the extra mile to add an O2 bung in the collector.

I have four on my 81. One to test back pressure, one for the stock narrow band (in the right bank manifold), another for wide band, and the fourth is used at the dyno since I don't like using the tail-pipe sniffer.
Old 07-25-2008, 07:16 PM
  #23  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Question

1) Why aren't your X-pipes mandrel bent?

2) How come that GT in your chart only made 256 HP at the wheels? that seems 20-30HP shy honestly? Was that car running with a "banana in the tailpipe?"
Old 07-27-2008, 12:07 AM
  #24  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Any concers for only sampling one bank with the O2 and not both?
There are two O2 bungs provided. The MSDS Headers have one in one collector, and I added one into my Header-X-Pipe on the oppposite side.

I figured the owner would want one for the stock O2 sensor, and the other for his wide-band O2 sensor...

Why aren't your X-pipes mandrel bent?
Because of the frequency of the turns needed in the length of the run. The "mandrel" of most mandrel benders requires 14 to 16 inches of straight tube - about 8 inches to each side of the apex. If you need to make two bends in a 12" length, your choices are either 1) mandrel bend two pipes and cut and weld them together, or 2) ram-bent tubes.

For this application, considering how mild the bends were (they are not very tight bends) ram bending was a good choice with a smooth interior and keeps cost down.

Dont forget mandrel bent tubing with welds add turbulance on the inside (where it counts) at every weld.

Last edited by Carl Fausett; 11-17-2008 at 10:43 AM.
Old 09-07-2008, 02:32 PM
  #25  
osborm
3rd Gear
 
osborm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Headers and X pipes.

Hi carl interested in this article on headers and x pipie:

https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...s+x+pipe+928s4

these would wake my 928s4 up but what would the cost of shipping to United Kingdom be cheers mike.
Old 09-07-2008, 10:48 PM
  #26  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Mike: I cannot produce a shipping quote from a partial address.

Send your complete address to shipping@928motorsports.com and we will get you a price. We do a LOT of international shipping - its no problem.
Old 11-17-2008, 01:27 AM
  #27  
steaditim
Rennlist Member
 
steaditim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: toronto
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump
Old 11-17-2008, 06:21 AM
  #28  
edi1
Rennlist Member
 
edi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ex pipes and h

hi have x pipes headers on my 88s4 with no cats. there is no ruble sound

but its sounds nice.
Old 01-24-2010, 11:40 AM
  #29  
Chuck Schreiber
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Chuck Schreiber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plano, Tx.
Posts: 3,453
Received 124 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Anyone running this setup??
Feedback appreciated!
Old 01-25-2010, 03:43 PM
  #30  
blau928
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
blau928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 12 Posts
Default O2 sensor in "X" pipe incorrect for LH

Originally Posted by Hacker-Pschorr
Most 928's running headers have been doing that since day one, no issues to speak of.
I haven't seen very many who went the extra mile to add an O2 bung in the collector.

I have four on my 81. One to test back pressure, one for the stock narrow band (in the right bank manifold), another for wide band, and the fourth is used at the dyno since I don't like using the tail-pipe sniffer.
The O2 bung in one bank still does not make it right even if no claimed problems by owners. The correct way is to put the bung in the middle of the "X" so that the sensor can read all cylinders. If you have a wideband on one header, and a narrow band on the other header, you will get wideband for one side, and the ECU will only be able to get information on the other side.

This picture is a setup from about 6 years ago with the proper placement of the O2 sensor with "X" pipes and headers using the Factory LH Computer. Both sides of the "X" have a bung so that a wideband and narrowband can be used. (The stock S4 exhaust has an "H" pipe in which the sensor is mounted.)

Only if an aftermarket ECU with DUAL O2 channels is used can you have one sensor per bank like the header is currently shown in Carl's setup.... Otherwise, the LH will not be able to read any information from the passenger side cylinder bank and correct accordingly...

I have mentioned this before, but it seems that too many go along with the "look" factor instead of proper design for intended use.. (The only other setup I have seen to date with the correct setup using an LH is Todd's..)

Anyway, enough of my rambling...
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: New Product: Header-X Pipe



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:20 AM.