New Product: Header-X Pipe
#16
After having a closer look at my exhaust system (1986 Euro 16V) I realize that it consists of no cats, both pipes go into a large central muffler, then two pipes exit widely to each side into a rather large resonator before both pipes join into the rear muffler. The pipes are (physically) more separated than the US 85-86 but not "true" duals" all the way.
The future combo headers + x-pipe + large resonators mean that I may have to keep some sort of rear mufflers, perhaps ending it all with a pair of SuperTrapps!?
The weight has to be kept as low as possible. This is meant to be a race-car with plates (and of course I need all the power I can get)
The future combo headers + x-pipe + large resonators mean that I may have to keep some sort of rear mufflers, perhaps ending it all with a pair of SuperTrapps!?
The weight has to be kept as low as possible. This is meant to be a race-car with plates (and of course I need all the power I can get)
#17
Developer
Thread Starter
What would be the better fit for me--do I do a Header x-pipe with cats and rmb or stick with regular x-pipe, no cats and rmb???
If you want more HP and can stand a little louder note, add the Header-x and remove the cats.
If you still want more HP, then add our hi-flow resonators/dual exhaust as the last step.
#19
Carl, as a second thought, not sure if I was clear earlier, but what I'm really going for is the most HP increase with the least sound increase; does that change your recommendation? Thanks, Dan ('91GT with stock exhaust)
#20
Anyone have a chance to compare this header/x-pipe combo against a standard ott/motorsport x-pipe? would be interesting to see the difference or how much more power it can produce.
#22
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Most 928's running headers have been doing that since day one, no issues to speak of.
I haven't seen very many who went the extra mile to add an O2 bung in the collector.
I have four on my 81. One to test back pressure, one for the stock narrow band (in the right bank manifold), another for wide band, and the fourth is used at the dyno since I don't like using the tail-pipe sniffer.
I haven't seen very many who went the extra mile to add an O2 bung in the collector.
I have four on my 81. One to test back pressure, one for the stock narrow band (in the right bank manifold), another for wide band, and the fourth is used at the dyno since I don't like using the tail-pipe sniffer.
#23
Nordschleife Master
Question
1) Why aren't your X-pipes mandrel bent?
2) How come that GT in your chart only made 256 HP at the wheels? that seems 20-30HP shy honestly? Was that car running with a "banana in the tailpipe?"
1) Why aren't your X-pipes mandrel bent?
2) How come that GT in your chart only made 256 HP at the wheels? that seems 20-30HP shy honestly? Was that car running with a "banana in the tailpipe?"
#24
Developer
Thread Starter
Any concers for only sampling one bank with the O2 and not both?
I figured the owner would want one for the stock O2 sensor, and the other for his wide-band O2 sensor...
Why aren't your X-pipes mandrel bent?
For this application, considering how mild the bends were (they are not very tight bends) ram bending was a good choice with a smooth interior and keeps cost down.
Dont forget mandrel bent tubing with welds add turbulance on the inside (where it counts) at every weld.
Last edited by Carl Fausett; 11-17-2008 at 10:43 AM.
#25
Headers and X pipes.
Hi carl interested in this article on headers and x pipie:
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...s+x+pipe+928s4
these would wake my 928s4 up but what would the cost of shipping to United Kingdom be cheers mike.
https://rennlist.com/forums/showthre...s+x+pipe+928s4
these would wake my 928s4 up but what would the cost of shipping to United Kingdom be cheers mike.
#26
Developer
Thread Starter
Mike: I cannot produce a shipping quote from a partial address.
Send your complete address to shipping@928motorsports.com and we will get you a price. We do a LOT of international shipping - its no problem.
Send your complete address to shipping@928motorsports.com and we will get you a price. We do a LOT of international shipping - its no problem.
#30
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Monterey Peninsula, CA
Posts: 2,374
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
12 Posts
O2 sensor in "X" pipe incorrect for LH
Most 928's running headers have been doing that since day one, no issues to speak of.
I haven't seen very many who went the extra mile to add an O2 bung in the collector.
I have four on my 81. One to test back pressure, one for the stock narrow band (in the right bank manifold), another for wide band, and the fourth is used at the dyno since I don't like using the tail-pipe sniffer.
I haven't seen very many who went the extra mile to add an O2 bung in the collector.
I have four on my 81. One to test back pressure, one for the stock narrow band (in the right bank manifold), another for wide band, and the fourth is used at the dyno since I don't like using the tail-pipe sniffer.
This picture is a setup from about 6 years ago with the proper placement of the O2 sensor with "X" pipes and headers using the Factory LH Computer. Both sides of the "X" have a bung so that a wideband and narrowband can be used. (The stock S4 exhaust has an "H" pipe in which the sensor is mounted.)
Only if an aftermarket ECU with DUAL O2 channels is used can you have one sensor per bank like the header is currently shown in Carl's setup.... Otherwise, the LH will not be able to read any information from the passenger side cylinder bank and correct accordingly...
I have mentioned this before, but it seems that too many go along with the "look" factor instead of proper design for intended use.. (The only other setup I have seen to date with the correct setup using an LH is Todd's..)
Anyway, enough of my rambling...