Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

1990 GT Starting Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2008, 09:37 AM
  #1  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1990 GT Starting Issue

Car is 90 GT with just performed:
1. Timing Belt Service
2. Intake R&R with everything underneath replaced
3. Dual Disc Upgrade

On two occasions I started the car and quickly started releasing the clutch. The car stalled and would crank but not start with a fuel smell.

On the first occasion:
I wonder about the car's alarm, so it was suggested that I cycle the locks. I cycled both the passenger and hatch locks without any change in the starting process. A mechanic cycled the drivers door lock and started the car, unfortunately I don't know "how" he tried to start the car (read below).

On the second occasion:
I cycled all locks with no change. Then in spite of knowing it was fuel injected, I put the throttle to the flow (like it was a flooded carburetor equipped car) and it started.

Does the above mean anything, or am I chasing coincidences? Does pressing the throttle to the floor change the starting process?
Old 03-09-2008, 09:47 AM
  #2  
WICruiser
Burning Brakes
 
WICruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chilton Wisconsin
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Pressing the pedal to the floor is the procedure to clear a flooded engine with fuel injection, similar to a carburetor.

Given that you just completed the refresh of the intake system I would not get overly concerned unless this problem continues when you have run the engine long enough to get up to temperature. Once you have run it through its paces let us know if the problem continues or it clears up.
Old 03-09-2008, 09:55 AM
  #3  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks Roger,

The second occasion was after I had put the car "through its paces" presuming you would agree that a 40 mile round trip drive would cover that. The car has been driven multiple times and got fully warm on each of several drives since the work was done.
Old 03-09-2008, 11:26 AM
  #4  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Has the LH been rebuilt?
Were the injectors sent out for flow/leak testing, cleaning, o-rings etc?
What about the temp-II sensor?
Old 03-09-2008, 11:36 AM
  #5  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 501 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

How about the vaccume to the fuel pressure regulators, do they hold pressure?
Old 03-09-2008, 12:43 PM
  #6  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 501 Likes on 267 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
..........and/or the supply vacuum lines?
Oh yea, forgot those.
Old 03-09-2008, 01:46 PM
  #7  
Mrmerlin
Team Owner
 
Mrmerlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 28,419
Received 2,548 Likes on 1,430 Posts
Default

check the crank position sensor. You should look into the bellhousing to see if any part of the clutch pack has damaged the pickup to ring gear interface.
I hope you replaced this part (the CPS) as well as the 2 knock sensors and the hall sensor and the TPS.
Old 03-09-2008, 04:34 PM
  #8  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I did not do the work on the car, so can't comment on the status of some of the parts. I presume I would have been advised of any possible issues with parts.

I will have to review the parts list to see what exactly was changed.

Thanks for the thoughts.
Old 03-09-2008, 07:19 PM
  #9  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,928
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I'm going with the LH starting to crap out.
Old 03-09-2008, 07:22 PM
  #10  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Veninger
I'm going with the LH starting to crap out.
So, just coincidence it is happening after all the service?
Old 03-09-2008, 08:38 PM
  #11  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Veninger
I'm going with the LH starting to crap out.
My '89 exhibits the same hard-start after a cold-die that Stan describes. And my '89 has a rebuilt LH ...

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
So, just coincidence it is happening after all the service?
... due to the original dying while the car was on stands getting the engine full monty.

It is certainly possible that the LH could be going south. It could also be something else too though.
Old 03-09-2008, 09:23 PM
  #12  
John Veninger
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
John Veninger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,928
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

The excessive gas smell is why I'm leaning that way.

I would think a crank sensor would just not let it start or fire the injectors
Old 03-09-2008, 09:35 PM
  #13  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Veninger
The excessive gas smell is why I'm leaning that way.
I would think a crank sensor would just not let it start or fire the injectors
I agree on both counts. The question is: not due to a bad LH, could the car, during the cold-cold start-up cycle be running so rich that when you kill it accidentally that it floods? If so, why? Temp-II comes to mind.
Old 03-09-2008, 10:13 PM
  #14  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
With the intake R&R its highly possible this is where the issue lies unless said mechanic didn't disconnect his brains.
Malcolm, could you clarify the above? If you mean to opine that the ECUs should have been disconnected during the motor work, this would be the first time I've heard this.
Old 03-09-2008, 10:59 PM
  #15  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
Dave..............given the sensitivity I disconnect the battery for almost any major project.
Of course. I thought you were advocating the route of disconnecting both the battery and the ECUs. Doing cam covers, intake, and t-belt with the battery connected would result in a lightning strike.


Quick Reply: 1990 GT Starting Issue



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:16 AM.