Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

1990 GT Starting Issue

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2008, 12:14 AM
  #16  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
"Stan had many things ongoing and said mechanic may have crossed wires"
I know you are trying to help, but please be careful. I didn't make such a statement nor intend to give that implication.

I am interested in where I should look and have some ideas. So many as to be a bit overwhelming. I did have this work done to avoid doing the work myself
Old 03-10-2008, 12:15 AM
  #17  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
Doing cam covers, intake, and t-belt with the battery connected would result in a lightning strike.
While I presume this unlikely, wouldn't the car not run at all if this were true?
Old 03-10-2008, 12:50 AM
  #18  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
While I presume this unlikely, wouldn't the car not run at all if this were true?
The most likely thing that would happen if you tried to do an engine full monty with the battery connected is that you would end up with a mild to deadly case of electrocution. But, I'd bet the car would be fine. In any case there's zero chance that the work done on your car was done with the battery connected. (Folks: Stan's not naming the mechanic that did the work but I know who it was (not me, btw) and thus I'm sure the battery was not connected during the motor work.)
Old 03-10-2008, 01:01 AM
  #19  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
Folks: Stan's not naming the mechanic that did the work but I know who it was (not me, btw) and thus I'm sure the battery was not connected during the motor work.)
Just trying to identify cause of my problems, so I can have a reliable 928 (if there is such a thing )
Old 03-10-2008, 06:39 PM
  #20  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
check the crank position sensor. You should look into the bellhousing to see if any part of the clutch pack has damaged the pickup to ring gear interface.
I hope you replaced this part (the CPS) as well as the 2 knock sensors and the hall sensor and the TPS.
Knock sensors, 928.606.144.00, were replaced
Hall sensor, 944.606.170.01, was replaced (interesting 944 part number)
I don't think the CPS was. If you are willing to provide the full name and part number and I will re-check.

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
..........and/or the supply vacuum lines?
All vacuum lines were replaced using the kit offered here by someone who no longer posts here

Originally Posted by SeanR
How about the vaccume to the fuel pressure regulators, do they hold pressure?
I haven't checked this. Car was running fine under heavy acceleration even after the surge at idle and cold start problem (until toothed belt service warning came on... tensioner was rebuilt, etc.)

Originally Posted by worf928
Has the LH been rebuilt?
Were the injectors sent out for flow/leak testing, cleaning, o-rings etc?
What about the temp-II sensor?
LH not rebuilt. I think I am going to send both computers out to be reviewed.
Injectors were cleaned, tested and replaced with new o-rings.
I think I am going to order the temp II sensor (why not...)

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
Stan..........did you replace the ISV and TPS when doing the intake R&R? Is it possible the ISV isn't connected properly? (it was a pain for me)
The idle control valve, 928.606.161.01, was replaced as well as the throttle switch, 928.606.157.00. So perhaps not the two you menion
Old 03-10-2008, 07:53 PM
  #21  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any thoughts on whether after market o2 sensors, at half the price as oem parts, they are attractive...
Old 03-10-2008, 08:55 PM
  #22  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Any thoughts on whether after market o2 sensors, at half the price as oem parts, they are attractive...
IIRC you have to cut the connector off of the old 02 sensor and splice it into the new one.
Old 03-10-2008, 08:56 PM
  #23  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
I think I am going to order the temp II sensor (why not...)
Why not? Well, throwing parts at a problem is statistically the most expensive way to fix a problem.
Old 03-10-2008, 09:20 PM
  #24  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,537
Received 1,675 Likes on 1,087 Posts
Default

Stan, you have the ... ahh.... "unmentionable software" procured by the OC? Yes?

Why don't you hook it up to your car and see what it says? Among other things it will allow you to see what the temp-II sensor is telling your computers. If it does everything that the Hammer does - I assume it does - then you should be able to check the operation of the Impulse Sender (Speed Sensor - called CPS here), ISV, Idle/Wot switch (called TPS here), etc.
Old 03-10-2008, 10:43 PM
  #25  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
I know you are trying to help, but please be careful. I didn't make such a statement nor intend to give that implication.

No you didn't but there is an issue with the car and in my mechanical experience returning to the last work typically leads to the problem; good luck.
Old 03-11-2008, 02:54 AM
  #26  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
IIRC you have to cut the connector off of the old 02 sensor and splice it into the new one.
Seems like a worthwhile effort to save 1/2 the cost of the part, and if that is the only difference, then it works for me.

Originally Posted by worf928
Why not? Well, throwing parts at a problem is statistically the most expensive way to fix a problem.
Perhaps, but perhaps not when the value of labor is considered. If it takes me an hour to determine it is bad and then another hour to replace it, I would save an hour just by replacing it. After all time is the truly irreplaceable commodity

Originally Posted by worf928
Stan, you have the ... ahh.... "unmentionable software" procured by the OC? Yes?

Why don't you hook it up to your car and see what it says? Among other things it will allow you to see what the temp-II sensor is telling your computers. If it does everything that the Hammer does - I assume it does - then you should be able to check the operation of the Impulse Sender (Speed Sensor - called CPS here), ISV, Idle/Wot switch (called TPS here), etc.
Ironically I don't, I will have to check with Mel Ward, as he has it from the last OC event. It is a thought I hadn't consider though!
Old 03-11-2008, 02:57 AM
  #27  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
No you didn't but there is an issue with the car and in my mechanical experience returning to the last work typically leads to the problem; good luck.
I definitely agree that the likely cause of a new problem is where the last work was performed. Until problem determination is performed, then I won't know what the cause is and I am not presuming I have any idea what the cause is.
Old 03-11-2008, 09:03 AM
  #28  
AO
Supercharged
Rennlist Member
 
AO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Back in Michigan - Full time!
Posts: 18,925
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Have you looked at any of the plugs? I think that's the first thing to look at. Then check to see if you have a good strong spark. How's your fuel pressure? Do you have a FP gauge?

I highly doubt it's the CPS. This is pretty much a go/no-go part and doesn't seem to be affected by temperature. One thing that does come to mind is the idle position switch. If you're not getting the idle contact, this can cause very hard starting when cold. The unmentionable software/tool will tell you if this is working or not.

Hope this helps.
Old 03-11-2008, 09:52 AM
  #29  
Jim R.
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jim R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Long Island and Lake George, NY
Posts: 917
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Another vote for the idle switch. I had one become non-operational shortly after an intake R&R. Pretty easy to check for.

Also, pull the vacuum lines off the FPR and dampers, check for fuel. I split the diaphragm on my '89 last year. Again, easy to check.

Jim
Old 03-11-2008, 12:52 PM
  #30  
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Wilbraham, MA
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Andrew Olson
Have you looked at any of the plugs? I think that's the first thing to look at. Then check to see if you have a good strong spark. How's your fuel pressure? Do you have a FP gauge?

I highly doubt it's the CPS. This is pretty much a go/no-go part and doesn't seem to be affected by temperature. One thing that does come to mind is the idle position switch. If you're not getting the idle contact, this can cause very hard starting when cold. The unmentionable software/tool will tell you if this is working or not.

Hope this helps.
The spark plugs are new, as are the plug wires, dist. caps and rotors.
The idle switch is also new.
I am presuming fuel pressure is good, as the car runs well normally.

The car actually starts well, but if I stall it (call me impatient) then it is hard to start.


Originally Posted by Jim R.
Another vote for the idle switch. I had one become non-operational shortly after an intake R&R. Pretty easy to check for.

Also, pull the vacuum lines off the FPR and dampers, check for fuel. I split the diaphragm on my '89 last year. Again, easy to check.

Jim
Did you replace your idle switch during the intake R&R and have it fail afterwards, like it was defective?

I am presuming the FPR is ok, as under normal conditions the car runs fine.

Perhaps I should re-phrase the title of the thread as "start, if stalls, difficulty restarting".

I do appreciate all the thoughts here, thank you.


Quick Reply: 1990 GT Starting Issue



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:25 AM.