Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

87 S4 vs 90 or so Supra turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2008, 05:32 PM
  #1  
Art_Z
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Art_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 87 S4 vs 90 or so Supra turbo

I had a chance to tangle with one of these today on a "closed course"



We each did a run from 80 to approx 145, straight line. My guess, based on how the Supra hung on to me from 80 to 120 was that it must have been chipped because we were dead even both times . Once we hit 120 he started loosing ground, I was at redline in 3rd so hit 4th (my car is an auto) and I proceded to move away. He had the obligatory "fart can" exhaust and the car was lowered, I'm assuming it had some sort of engine mods.

Looks like my next step is an x-pipe
Old 01-06-2008, 05:38 PM
  #2  
perrys4
The Lady's Man
Rennlist Member
 
perrys4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: south O.C. california
Posts: 10,444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those cars are fast stock. Hard to find one these days that hasn't been modified but they should give a good run. You do mean it was the twin turbo model, right?

EDIT! Just saw your picture. I was referrign to later year car.
Old 01-06-2008, 05:39 PM
  #3  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

are you serious, that toyota looks like hell

no contest
Old 01-06-2008, 05:44 PM
  #4  
Art_Z
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Art_Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
are you serious, that toyota looks like hell

no contest
yes, I thought it would be an easy kill, especially since I was in the 928 "sweet spot" of 80mph. like i said, he must have had the boost up pretty high on that thing.
Old 01-06-2008, 05:55 PM
  #5  
Kevin Michael
Rocket Pilot
Rennlist Member
 
Kevin Michael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: gettysburg pa.
Posts: 3,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Art,that is a MK3 Supra. You can bet your paycheck it was wound up far from stock. I happen to know a little about these things as one of my associates professionally builds these things(mainly MK4's). If that car was stock it would have totally ran out of top end at 130 and would have been gasping by 110. We have one at the shop right now that will run 10's. The stock ones run near low 15's or so with a good driver, high 15's without. Problem is it's hard to tell when their stock.
Kevin
Old 01-06-2008, 09:12 PM
  #6  
IcemanG17
Race Director
 
IcemanG17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 16,265
Received 71 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

I think this Gen turbo supra came stock with 230hp....in a fairly heavy car....about 3500lbs...... of course this is basically the same motor that regualrly makes well over 1000hp in the later supras.....early ones can make the same power.... So in a straight line they can be very fast.....a newer one won the Texas Mile last year at over 228mph!!!

Make the supra turn a couple times and you'll be GONE..... Ever wonder why you never see Supras on the racetrack...only the dragstrip....... simple they overheat quickly and don't handle all that well
Old 01-06-2008, 09:17 PM
  #7  
JPTL
Rennlist Member
 
JPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 2,653
Received 202 Likes on 89 Posts
Default

Wade T. could weigh in on this thread...
Old 01-06-2008, 10:48 PM
  #8  
syoo8
Burning Brakes
 
syoo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Columbia, MO / San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 946
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

? The picture of the white Supra is from a Wikipedia article, isn't it?
Old 01-06-2008, 11:24 PM
  #9  
BrettStrikes
Rennlist Member
 
BrettStrikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southeastern Massachusetts
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based on Wikipedia, the Supra is not much slower than an S4...6.2 0-60...14.7 1/4 time and a top end of 156.....stock S4 is about 14 seconds in the quarter...so you are talking about 8-10 car lengths to 100 mph from a start...Wikipedia states it has an extremely restrictive exhaust...so if it had a coffee can out the back...it probably would explain the close run....
Old 01-07-2008, 12:06 AM
  #10  
Panzer9
Pro
 
Panzer9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those square boxes are BUTT UGLY!. Now , on the other hand... Back in 95, I drove a Twin- Turbo Supra (340 HP- IIRC) That was the fastest and most exciting car I've driven- Not to mention Beautiful as Hell.
Road & Track classed them in the Supercar league of the day- along with Ferraris, and Lotuses. There is a black one I see locally which just gives me wood! ALL BLACK - PERFACT PAINT, KICKASS WHEELS, LOWERED SUSPENSION, NASTY EXHAUST, etc., etc. Also a very Sharp, updated 300 ZX locally which is Mean! My favorite Local car, though, is a Black V-8 Lotus Esprit- AWESOME ( not the earlier high- strung Turbo 4 cyl's.)
Old 01-07-2008, 12:17 AM
  #11  
Lizard928
Nordschleife Master
 
Lizard928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Abbotsford B.C.
Posts: 9,600
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

crank walk crank walk lol.



haha couldn't resist, these cars (either this mrk or the next) were pretty famous for having the crank eat the block, basically TBF.
Old 01-07-2008, 12:44 AM
  #12  
The_Remora
Pro
 
The_Remora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I raced an MK3 Supra like the one pictured in my '83 S. Was from about 70 ---> on the highway late at night not much traffic. Looked like he had some exhaust mods, he had passenger and I didn't. Close race but I pulled on him a bit. Then we cruised together high speed until his exit, waved to each other. I would think an S4 would drop him fast, but then it all comes down to the mods, drivers etc.
Old 01-07-2008, 02:19 AM
  #13  
GeorgeM
Rennlist Member
 
GeorgeM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 1,108
Received 101 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Mk4 is the way to go. Panzer is right on. IMHO, huge difference in the Mk3 and Mk4 (can't even compare the looks).

The Mk2, on the other hand, although only ~145hp, was a milestone japanese GT with the best motor Toyota ever built... the silky smooth 5MGE.

I got an '84 non-sunroof S model back in '87 and it's still in the family with over 250K+ miles and still silky smooth.
Old 01-07-2008, 02:46 AM
  #14  
Jascd
Instructor
 
Jascd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My mechanic is a supra fan with a fairly recent model, the Mk4 i guess, and his co mechanic is an german ex Audi and Ferrari mechanic who has just bought a supra and says they are every bit as fast as most Ferrari's he has worked on. Also can't beat that Toyota reliability. Don't really like the styling though and not much space, but a great performer all the same.
Old 01-07-2008, 03:55 AM
  #15  
icsmike
Drifting
 
icsmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central MO
Posts: 3,025
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I used to be all over these type of cars ofter owning a few in its class. (Rx-7 NA's and turbo II's, 300ZX's, 280Z's) The Supra was a great car with a strong engine just like the Z cars VG30 etc. But they were HEAVY and under powered until the MK4 (twin turbo model) which holds its value very well. i think the supra and the 928 have a lot in common......large and comfortable.


Quick Reply: 87 S4 vs 90 or so Supra turbo



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:33 PM.