Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

U-Shaped fuel line between rails?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-26-2006, 05:06 PM
  #16  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 830 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Ryan,
Absolutly right - if you are not qualified to do it go to a proffesional.
In my case I want to do it myself and will take all the care that is needed to replace the hoses on my cars properly.
If I am not 100% satisfied I will go down another avenue.
The last thing I need is a fire that can totally destroy my car in less than 10 mins.
Roger
__________________

Does it have the "Do It Yourself" manual transmission, or the superior "Fully Equipped by Porsche" Automatic Transmission? George Layton March 2014

928 Owners are ".....a secret sect of quietly assured Porsche pragmatists who in near anonymity appreciate the prodigious, easy going prowess of the 928."






Old 10-26-2006, 05:10 PM
  #17  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
yes Roger you certianly have a point, you could do it 1000 times and 999 times you wouldnt have a leak, pretty good odds but when i mentioned that i thought they would fail, i wasnt thinking so much the first time you do it and install, rather a yea down the road when you replace injectors, or repaint your intake manifold or something else after youve forgotten about it or sold the car to someone that dosent know. Yes it will work but for a hose that can destroy a car and possibly you i would try afwul hard to have them professionally replaced before doing something with screw to tighten clamps.

I think for the most part the only thing that should be recomended is that it be replaced by a professional supplier. There are some on Rennlist that dont have experience with this type of thing and may not know much about cars in general. As for suggestion i think it should only be suggested to replace properly, but someone with their own experience and wisdom, if they think there is another alternative they obviously can decide to use that method.

Ryan,

No offence but I don’t think you know what you’re talking about. Your theory is based on the fact that if it came like that form the factory, then it must stay that way.

There is absolutely nothing wrong using fuel injection hose clamps. Vast majority of car manufacturers have and are still using FI claps. If you use the proper sized clamp then there is no way in hell it will even fail. I guarantee if tested, the hose will fail way before the clamps. The same goes for FI hose too. They are rated and designed for fuel injection applications and are suitable replacement for the 928.
Old 10-26-2006, 06:28 PM
  #18  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

well i am not a fuel supply engineer you got me there. I am sure someone in the Porsche factory is though. yes as i said you can do whatever you want with your car. I do know i have seen a number of 928 catch fire, be it from leaking AC refrigerant, PS hoses, or fuel lines. I dont know why you would skimp on those parts, sure they dont need to be porsche, but i think they should have the same fitting, and yes i think just slipping a peice of new hose over a barb fitting and clamping it down is most definately a poor replacement for the original. Especially thos fittings that go from the somewhat stable chasis to the rocking engine, i sure as hell dont trust a hose clamp to keep my lines from seperating. Yeah like i said sure it will probably work, but i wouldnt suggest it. And if you look at my original post, i said i wouldnt suggest it.

Knock yourself out, when i saw that my devek engine had such a fuel line fitted, i immediately removed it.

To each his own, its your car, you probably have more experience with barbfittings for fuel lines then i do thats for sure. I just wouldnt use them on the fuel rails as you are suggesting. Its another point of view that i think someone should hear when they need to make this decision.
Old 10-26-2006, 06:42 PM
  #19  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the reason i am against this, the one i saw installed, the hose clamps were loose, simple as that, sure when you install them they are tight, but they stretch, enough so that the hose will now swivel across the barb fitting. If it was seated correctly it shouldnt rotate on the metal barb, if properly seated it shouldnt move PERIOD. If you do decide to go for this, i would make a mental note to check them every year at least to make sure there is still enough bite on that clamp
Old 10-26-2006, 06:49 PM
  #20  
sharkmeister85
Three Wheelin'
 
sharkmeister85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

So what's the difference between the worm gear clamp and the FI clamp? Any pics?
Glenn
Old 10-26-2006, 07:36 PM
  #21  
the flyin' scotsman
Rennlist Member
 
the flyin' scotsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,710
Received 53 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Not to get involved in the EFI fuel line/clamp vs worm gear debate but.............

PET shows this line as 928110271 02

928 Int shows new and used availability
928 SP shows new availability
Old 10-26-2006, 08:42 PM
  #22  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

HA HA

yeah malcom stay of this, i wish i never said anything now
Old 10-27-2006, 11:24 AM
  #23  
2V4V
Burning Brakes
 
2V4V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Properly installed FI clamps are just as reliable as crimped connections.
Just about every European manufacturer uses them somewhere on the fuel system.

But back to the topic at hand, you might need to go to a "real" hydraulics shop in your area - the local auto parts store that makes hoses may, or may not, have the correct fittings.

Or, if you know what you are doing and feel comfortable doing it, rebuild it yorself using properly sized EFI clamps.

If you are paranoid about the clamps coming loose, just get a proper size Oetiker clamp - that will *never* come off until you cut it off.

Greg
Old 10-27-2006, 01:03 PM
  #24  
Imo000
Captain Obvious
Super User
 
Imo000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,846
Received 337 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
the reason i am against this, the one i saw installed, the hose clamps were loose, simple as that, sure when you install them they are tight, but they stretch, enough so that the hose will now swivel across the barb fitting. If it was seated correctly it shouldnt rotate on the metal barb, if properly seated it shouldnt move PERIOD. If you do decide to go for this, i would make a mental note to check them every year at least to make sure there is still enough bite on that clamp

I think I can finally see where your concerns are really coming from. The hose clamps that you saw must have been too big for the application and when tightened they didn’t fully compress the hose. This has nothing to do with their performance and everything to do with proper installation. Proper sized FI clamps are just as good as the OE cramped fittings. This mistake can just as easily made by a shop that installs the crimped fittings. FI clamps will not stretch, worm gear style clamps can. The bottom line is that worm clamps can’t safely hold enough pressure to be used in FI applications The clamp you saw on your replacement engine, was it FI or just the regular worm?


Here is a link to the FI clamps: http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=h...lr%3D%26sa%3DG



And another for the worm gear style clamps (scroll down the page to see it): http://www.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=h...l%3Den%26lr%3D
Old 10-28-2006, 03:55 AM
  #25  
Tony
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 14,671
Received 580 Likes on 302 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RyanPerrella
, and yes i think just slipping a peice of new hose over a barb fitting and clamping it down is most definately a poor replacement for the original. .
Perhaps im wrong but ive torn apart my fair share of fuel lines on my car. The stock lines are just that...a hose slipped onto a barb..! Actually i think most aeroquip hose are like that??
I was pretty amazed at what apeared to be a pretty ugly looking hose that turned out to be an aboslute SOB to remove from the fitting.
The stock hoses are very tough! but hey, 20yrs in an engine will take its toll on anything so replace them when you can.
I replaced all mine using steel brained fuel injection line. I only did this as i had hoses routed in different locations than stock. Plain old rated FI line from Pepboys is tough stuff and should be more than adequate. ! I used all the stock fittings and had them all slip fitted then crimped on.

Old 10-28-2006, 10:09 AM
  #26  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 830 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Tony,
You are dead right there is nothing special about a crimped ferrule over a barb and a clamp is in IMOO a better solution. Out of interest on the Jag V12 fuel system its a hose pushed over the barb no clamp or ferrule.

The big issue for us all is to replace the hoses ASAP. If they are NLA the EFI hose and clamp route is the way to go.
Old 10-28-2006, 10:15 AM
  #27  
928drvr86.5
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
928drvr86.5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dubuque, Iowa.
Posts: 1,663
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Geez, i didn't mean to spark such a debate here, but it's all good.
Old 10-28-2006, 11:15 AM
  #28  
2V4V
Burning Brakes
 
2V4V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Several companies offer 'push-on' connectors. These are exactly what you might think, barbed fitting and a specific type of hose.

They are rated for apps up to 200 PSI (and up) depending on who you get them from (Earl's, Aeroquip, Fragola, etc...).
Old 10-29-2006, 01:07 AM
  #29  
H2
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
H2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Northwest
Posts: 5,982
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by the flyin' scotsman
Not to get involved in the EFI fuel line/clamp vs worm gear debate but.............

PET shows this line as 928110271 02

928 Int shows new and used availability
928 SP shows new availability
For the '85-86 I think this U shaped hose is no longer available.

HH
Old 10-31-2006, 08:20 PM
  #30  
ROG100
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
ROG100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Double Oak, TX
Posts: 16,815
Received 830 Likes on 326 Posts
Default

Well this topic intrigued me enough to go a step further.
I took one of the hoses that runs between the fuel rails at the front of the engine (from a GTS) and cut away the ferrule. What I thought was a ferrule anyway.
The collar is purely cosmetic and made of very thin gauge metal. It is in no way an integral part of the hose end fitting and does not swage the hose on to the barbed fitting.
Infact if you go and check your hoses you will find that the collar spins freely on the hose end.
Same on a new one.
So the Porsche factory hose has a push fit barbed connector just like the Jag V12 I mentioned earlier in the thread.
This would make the EFI hose with the EFI clamp a far more superior solution to those of us paranoid about toasted 928's.
I am going to look further into getting the correct EFI hose with a S/S braided layer to help against rubbing. I will follow up when I have more info.
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: U-Shaped fuel line between rails?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:14 PM.