Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Compression Readings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2005, 11:42 AM
  #16  
AJK
Racer
Thread Starter
 
AJK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Webster, NY USA
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Curt,

My 928 is Petrol Blue, but I also have seen that red one. Mine is not on the road yet, still trying to track down a coolant leak.
Old 05-12-2005, 02:26 PM
  #17  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

As you know, the 10:1 compression comes from the ratio of the cylinder displacement vs what it is compressed into when the piston is at TDC. (ie the combustion chamber volume) but, i see your point. 10:1 should be 10x 14.7 + 14.7, so close to 164psi. obviosly, it can be lower due to cam profiles, but certainly, the max pressure should represent the ratio in pressure.
GREAT question!

anyone?

MK

my 5 liter that i actually measured the ratio was 9.8:1 and i only measured pressure of 155psi. (so right in range) . my 84 with a 9.3:1 rating, was in the 130psi range, the Holbert car with a theoretical 10:1 compression ratio, puts out 185psi and who knows what the REAL compression is. maybe another underating from porsche. Ive also measured compression of a stockish, 6.0L stroker at 220psi. hmmmm 14:1 compression??? maybe !

Hmmm.
Originally Posted by sublimate
Can anyone explain to me why the pressures are so high? Since atmospheric pressure is 14.7psi I thought that the max you would see from a 10:1 compression engine would be about 147psi (or 125psi with 8.5:1), and that would be assuming a 100% volumetric efficency. Is there really significant overpressurization (due to pressure pulses or intake momentum) at cranking speeds? Or is there something else I'm missing?
Old 05-12-2005, 02:52 PM
  #18  
sublimate
Gluteus Maximus
Rennlist Member
 
sublimate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
As you know, the 10:1 compression comes from the ratio of the cylinder displacement vs what it is compressed into when the piston is at TDC. (ie the combustion chamber volume) but, i see your point. 10:1 should be 10x 14.7 + 14.7, so close to 164psi. obviosly, it can be lower due to cam profiles, but certainly, the max pressure should represent the ratio in pressure.
GREAT question!
Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will step in, but I actually would have guessed it to be 10 x 14.7 - 14.7, so closer to 132psi. This is because every compression tester I've seen measures gauge pressure, not absolute pressure.

A compression ration of 1:1 would be no compression as I understand it. Therefore the air stays at 14.7 psi but the tester reads as zero since it's they same as atmospheric.
A compression ratio of 2:1 would half the volume and double the (absolute) pressure to 29.4psi. But the tester would read 14.7psi (29.4 - 14.7).

By that reasoning, an 8.5:1 ratio would yeild 110psi and a 10:1 ration would yeild 132psi. But obviously I'm way off. What's up?
Old 05-12-2005, 09:29 PM
  #19  
Daniel Dudley
Rennlist Member
 
Daniel Dudley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,670
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Had a car a few years back that had not been run for some time. After I had run it for a while I did a compression test. All high one low at 120. Did a wet test with marvel mystery and the compression shot up to normal and never went back down. Now I never start an engine that has been sitting long without oiling the cylinders, cranking without plugs. putting plugs back in and cranking again. The funny thing was the ring had stayed stuck even though I was running the engine. Not too much oil though. You don't want to lock the engine up.



Quick Reply: Compression Readings



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:23 AM.