New Supercharged 1990 GT Results
#31
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by John Veninger
Carl,
I'm also wondering why the HP drops out before 6K compared to the NA that
I'm also wondering why the HP drops out before 6K compared to the NA that
Good job; another MURF928 SuperShark is on the road!
#32
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Lag ,
Those numbers you are estimating are closer to what I expected. Is it also possible the knock sensors are faulty and retarding the timing six degrees besides lower boost? I have some interest in this as well, since I plan on SC'ing my GT very soon. I am trying to schedule a dyno for next week to baseline the car. I have the last dyno from 2000 at 292rwhp and 289 rwtq bone stock. Hopefully those numbers will be consistent.
Jim R.
Those numbers you are estimating are closer to what I expected. Is it also possible the knock sensors are faulty and retarding the timing six degrees besides lower boost? I have some interest in this as well, since I plan on SC'ing my GT very soon. I am trying to schedule a dyno for next week to baseline the car. I have the last dyno from 2000 at 292rwhp and 289 rwtq bone stock. Hopefully those numbers will be consistent.
Jim R.
#33
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Jim R.
Those numbers you are estimating are closer to what I expected. Is it also possible the knock sensors are faulty and retarding the timing six degrees besides lower boost?
I have some interest in this as well, since I plan on SC'ing my GT very soon. I am trying to schedule a dyno for next week to baseline the car. I have the last dyno from 2000 at 292rwhp and 289 rwtq bone stock. Hopefully those numbers will be consistent.
#34
Developer
Thread Starter
Lag is right on the money - I just finished looking at the video from the Dyno Shop last night, and at the very end of the pull you can hear the belt squeel.
I never heard that from inside the car.
I had a thrown my video camera at a kid that was gawking at the beautiful 928 and asked him to video a couple of the pulls. I can hear the belt squeel on only one of the 2 piulls he taped.
I agree with Lag - it's hard to know how much to tighten a new SC belt - you want to go a little easy on the bearings in a new supercharger until they bed in a bit. Also - the rate of acceleration on a dyno that produces belt slippage will never be duplicated in the real world.
From Andy:
1) the Murf kit does not require a hole in the WWasher reservoir.
2) the kit does not require R&R of the intake manifold.
3) the kit does not require replacement of the knock sensors.
4) the kit does require removal of the stock 24lb injectors and replacement with 30 lb injectors that are provided.
"Non-Invasive" in medicine means not entering the body. In engine mods, it means not enteriing the engine. The Murf kit and the 928M kit are non-invasive, true bolt-on kits.
Remember that there is not "one right way" - there are a variety of ways to get more HP out of any motor: Boring, stroking, nitrous, turbo, roots supercharger, twin-screw SC, centrifugal SC, axial SC, fuel additives; and they ALL WORK if designed and engineered correctly. Each method has its pluses and minuses and unique characteristics.
It is not neccesary to put down another's product because it is different than your own. Point out the differences and leave it at that.
I never heard that from inside the car.
I had a thrown my video camera at a kid that was gawking at the beautiful 928 and asked him to video a couple of the pulls. I can hear the belt squeel on only one of the 2 piulls he taped.
I agree with Lag - it's hard to know how much to tighten a new SC belt - you want to go a little easy on the bearings in a new supercharger until they bed in a bit. Also - the rate of acceleration on a dyno that produces belt slippage will never be duplicated in the real world.
From Andy:
No permanent changes? There is no hole in the washer reservoir, no holes drilled in the fire wall to mount the FPR? Awsome!
Stock fuel system? I thought Tim's kit removed the stock injectors and FPR and replaced them with aftermarket parts?
Stock fuel system? I thought Tim's kit removed the stock injectors and FPR and replaced them with aftermarket parts?
2) the kit does not require R&R of the intake manifold.
3) the kit does not require replacement of the knock sensors.
4) the kit does require removal of the stock 24lb injectors and replacement with 30 lb injectors that are provided.
"Non-Invasive" in medicine means not entering the body. In engine mods, it means not enteriing the engine. The Murf kit and the 928M kit are non-invasive, true bolt-on kits.
Remember that there is not "one right way" - there are a variety of ways to get more HP out of any motor: Boring, stroking, nitrous, turbo, roots supercharger, twin-screw SC, centrifugal SC, axial SC, fuel additives; and they ALL WORK if designed and engineered correctly. Each method has its pluses and minuses and unique characteristics.
It is not neccesary to put down another's product because it is different than your own. Point out the differences and leave it at that.
#35
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,322
Received 1,542 Likes
on
1,006 Posts
Originally Posted by Jim R.
... schedule a dyno for next week to baseline the car...
#36
Range Master
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by Lagavulin
I am sure it is because the belt is slipping; it is hard to initially judge how tight to make the belt. Judging by the rwhp numbers, the car was probably doing less than 7 psi; an 8 psi GT should do 435 rwhp.
Good job; another MURF928 SuperShark is on the road!
Good job; another MURF928 SuperShark is on the road!
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Edmonton, Ab
Posts: 2,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Back in the day, we used to run the GM roots-type S/C with a toothed belt like the 928's cam timing belt, onlu about twice as wide. Why do these 928 S/C kits not use toothed belts to get around the slippage issues, guys?
#38
Range Master
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by BrianG
Back in the day, we used to run the GM roots-type S/C with a toothed belt like the 928's cam timing belt, onlu about twice as wide. Why do these 928 S/C kits not use toothed belts to get around the slippage issues, guys?
#40
Developer
Thread Starter
Brian - some do use a toothed or cogged belt, like the Albrecht kit in Austria.
Generally, a centrifugal SC does not have near the drag as a positive-discplacement blower like a Roots, and a cogged belt is not neccesary.
The downside of a cogged belt is that they produce vibration and we like to avoid that where possible.
On the Albrecht system where they use a cogged belt, to change the pulley ratio to run a higher or lower boost, you must change out the CRANK pulley each time, the pulley on the head unit stays the same. Weird.
I have 2 customers in Great Britain that I feed with parts to keep their Albrecht system running, so I am pretty familiar with them.
To say there is a belt slippage "problem" is to overstate it. When properly tensioned, I have no belt slippage on any of my SC cars or Tims installs. In this case, I had a new belt on a new SC at the dyno, and I undershot the initial belt tension a tad. That's all.
Generally, a centrifugal SC does not have near the drag as a positive-discplacement blower like a Roots, and a cogged belt is not neccesary.
The downside of a cogged belt is that they produce vibration and we like to avoid that where possible.
On the Albrecht system where they use a cogged belt, to change the pulley ratio to run a higher or lower boost, you must change out the CRANK pulley each time, the pulley on the head unit stays the same. Weird.
I have 2 customers in Great Britain that I feed with parts to keep their Albrecht system running, so I am pretty familiar with them.
To say there is a belt slippage "problem" is to overstate it. When properly tensioned, I have no belt slippage on any of my SC cars or Tims installs. In this case, I had a new belt on a new SC at the dyno, and I undershot the initial belt tension a tad. That's all.
#41
Range Master
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by BrianG
you young whipper-snappers got this all wrong......
Us fogies perefer our slippage at the asphalt-interface.....
Us fogies perefer our slippage at the asphalt-interface.....
That is a compliment man......I am well past a half a century old.....
My Supershark has plenty of slippage at the asphalt-interface......so much so that I went to 10 x 18 Hoosiers just to "hook up".....I like the option of being able to lighten the boost for every day driving, and tweak it up for "special events"..
to each his own..............
#42
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Green Bay Wisconsin
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think I may have the solution to the belt tensioner. This is a die spring with 360 lbs force at 70% deflection. The one in the picture is on the car that I am testing out the stage one kit. Sorry for the fuzzy pic, I was obviously focused on the oil spot on the floor.
Last edited by Tim Murphy; 01-06-2013 at 10:04 PM.
#44
Range Master
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Pepsie Lite
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Tim, It is an "upgrade", right??????
#45
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Southern New England
Posts: 1,975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Brian,
It is also true that Vortech designs accomodate both types of drives; the standard unit utilizes a ribbed belt, and their "heavy duty" unit utilizes a cogged belt. I believe the gears in the standard unit would not fare well if driven with a cogged belt.
It is also true that Vortech designs accomodate both types of drives; the standard unit utilizes a ribbed belt, and their "heavy duty" unit utilizes a cogged belt. I believe the gears in the standard unit would not fare well if driven with a cogged belt.