Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

New SC L-Jet will join us soon too!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-13-2004, 01:45 AM
  #1  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default New SC L-Jet will join us soon too!

Just received a 1984 928 S - L-Jetronic to supercharge. 60,000 original miles on the car. I will be doing a timing belt/water pump replacement for maintenance reasons, and supercharging it for the customer.

We dyno'd it today to get the "before" chart and to confirm that the Bosch L-Jetronic air-fuel was working properly before the SC install. Look at the chart below - I do not think I have ever seen a flatter air/fuel chart, really exceptional. This 5 spd 928 S is totally stock in every way.

I'll post results after the SC install when I have them. I figure about 4 weeks because I am finishing the 1990 GT SC install and going to SoCal for Sharktoberfest.
Attached Images   
Old 10-13-2004, 02:20 AM
  #2  
Jack '84 928s
Drifting
 
Jack '84 928s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hobbs, NM (or lovington)
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I need a 2nd job or something so i can supercharge mine...
Old 10-13-2004, 02:26 AM
  #3  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,099
Received 333 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

I can't wait to see the blown numbers!

I'm just happy my poor old '81 4.5, with twice the miles, made similar RW numbers - with an automatic!
Old 10-13-2004, 02:32 AM
  #4  
onebad928s
Pro
 
onebad928s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

quick carl,
you were already offering a kit for the L-jets, is it me or are you just testing them now since if im right this is the first post with the L-jet.

Lou
83 928 5speed
Old 10-13-2004, 11:24 AM
  #5  
Shane
Sharkaholic
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Rochester, WA
Posts: 5,162
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PorKen
I can't wait to see the blown numbers!
My sentiments exactly!

Be nice to see all though Ljets running around have some more bite to go with their looks!
Old 10-13-2004, 12:30 PM
  #6  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Onebad -
you are right, we had done all the development for L-Jet and built kits but have not had a L-Jet "taker" before now. We offered a discount (10%) to who-ever wanted to be first, and this customer took it. That is why I am doing the installation myuslef - so if I run into any unforeseen issues I can ressolve them.

At the rate these seem to go - about 6 to 8 installs per year - it'll be a little while before anybody can say they have previous experience with every year, fuel system, compression ration, 2v/4v setup. In each make and model year - there is always a "first".

We will be putting 6 psi non-intercooled on this engine and our research with Bosch and the good help of 2v4v in our shop makes us believe that it will fuel at 5 psi with no modifications. At 6 psi (our goal on this project) we may have to add a FMU. That's why its here (the customer brought it here from Maryland) - so I can make sure it is fueling right before he gets it back.
Old 10-13-2004, 11:33 PM
  #7  
bshaw
Instructor
 
bshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northeast
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Power seems a little low, dosen't it? Mine did 210 hp, 261 ft/lbs on the Dynojet before I SC'ed it. Now 265 hp, 284 ft lbs on 5 lbs of boost.
Old 10-14-2004, 01:06 AM
  #8  
toofast928
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
toofast928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: N NJ
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Bill are you sure of your #'s? You gained 50 hp and 23 ft lbs?

Tony--
Old 10-14-2004, 01:15 AM
  #9  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

bshaw - I agree, seems about 10 HP off from what I expected. I know this Dyno to be very accurate with other cars, so I do not think that is it. 60,000 miles on the car, pretty well taken care of, timing belt replaced 2 years ago and I wonder if it is off 1 tooth... or the spark plug gap is to wide... or the compression is weak somewhere.. somthing is amiss. I'll look into it.
Old 10-14-2004, 08:10 AM
  #10  
hacker-pschorr
Administrator - "Tyson"
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
hacker-pschorr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Up Nort
Posts: 1,451
Received 2,069 Likes on 1,181 Posts
Default

Carl - just an FYI about the power of this car. My car has good compression, new plugs gapped correctly, all nuw vacuum lines, plug wires, cap, and rotor etc..... At the dyno in Manitowoc, it put down 160rwhp. That was the same day Murphy's stock S4 did 260 and his Murf928 did 550+. Friday Jim Page is going to assist me in checking cam timing.

So in Green Bay we have the highest known dyno numbers for a 928, and the lowest.
Old 10-14-2004, 09:29 AM
  #11  
bshaw
Instructor
 
bshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northeast
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toofast928
Bill are you sure of your #'s? You gained 50 hp and 23 ft lbs?

Tony--

Hi Tony,

Yes, I'm pretty sure of the numbers. Both runs were on the same dyno and plotted on the same graph. I'm not sure what Quick Carl had before OCIC, but my SC'ed numbers jive with the results of his post-SC dyno run there.

BTW Carl, both of my dyno runs showed an AFR as flat as the one above. L-jet does a pretty good job of controlling the AFR, as does the '749 when all is right.
Old 10-14-2004, 10:48 AM
  #12  
Scott M.
Rest in Peace
Rennlist Member
 
Scott M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Penn State
Posts: 2,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Carl;

Your 84 car seems to be about 20hp/25tq lower than comparable 84 cars. Check out the dyno runs post of a few days ago for comparasions. Might I suggest you re-dyno this car after you find it's missing numbers, before you SC it. Honestly, I have a somewhat vested interest in you work and in order to be truely unbiased in the final product I would need more factual readings. Pre and post.

Good luck w/ the install.

Scott
Old 10-14-2004, 02:57 PM
  #13  
Jim bailey - 928 International
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jim bailey - 928 International's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Anaheim California
Posts: 11,542
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The old very brown 1980 dynoed 188hp -221torque (edit) Keith Widom's car was virtually identical same day same dyno ......they are 4.5 engines. The 4.7 should have maybe 10 hp more, not much you might check ignition timing.

Last edited by Jim bailey - 928 International; 10-14-2004 at 03:23 PM.
Old 10-14-2004, 03:09 PM
  #14  
PorKen
Inventor
Rennlist Member

 
PorKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 10,099
Received 333 Likes on 199 Posts
Default

I think Jim meant to type: "188hp -221tq"

Over the course of many dyno sessions, I scored ~190 RWHP and ~220 RWTQ (stock cams and exhaust manifolds).

Side note: I run my cams ~3 degrees advanced, which the dyno showed a trade of ~5 RWTQ for ~5 RWHP, and moved the peaks lower by ~600 RPM.
Old 10-31-2004, 11:44 PM
  #15  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Progress photos... its coming along...
Attached Images    



Quick Reply: New SC L-Jet will join us soon too!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:51 PM.