Notices
928 Forum 1978-1995
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: 928 Specialists

Here's a fun little engine. Stock GT that's a 5.8 liter.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-01-2019, 11:12 PM
  #1  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default Here's a fun little engine. Stock GT that's a 5.8 liter.

I've been building a bunch of these "little" strokers, for various reasons.

This engine was from a really beautiful GT and "died" a terrible death from "intake debris" let over from cleaning, before paint. The damage to the cylinder bores was so extensive that they would not "clean up" at the first (and only) Porsche oversize of 100.5mm. This greatly "limits" the choices of repair, especially if the original engine serial number needs to be retained. In this case, we used factory 104mm pistons and just for giggles, tossed in one of our custom GTS stroke crankshafts. This combination enables us to use a connecting rod greater than 6" in length! The lighter forged piston, with the long connecting rod, and the lightweight custom crankshaft makes these engines "change rpms" (rev) very quickly.

The result is a "mini stroker" of 5.8 liter displacement. In this engine, every single piece was stock GT (down to the 100,000 mile catalytic converter), except for the crankshaft, the connecting rods, the rod bearings, the pistons, and the head gaskets. (I'm building another version of this engine, right now, with more aggressive camshafts (thanks to Colin) and my custom header/exhaust system....I'll post that, when it is done.)

This engine totally transformed this car. So smooth and so easy to drive. It starts from any street corner in 2nd gear, without issue (I found this out by "sleeping" at a light and starting out in 3rd gear, which it also does easily.) Note that it makes over 300 ft. lbs of rear wheel torque all the way from 2200 rpms to 5900 rpms, which is extremely nice. The 341 horsepower at the rear wheels converts to 380 flywheel horsepower, using a very conservative 12.5% correction factor....easily surpassing a stock GTS.

One of the really important things we have spent hours perfecting, is making all our engines extremely driveable. Hours and hours of "Sharktuning" has given us a fantastic ability to make these engines silky smooth. They run smoother than any stock engine and "transform" into a screamer, when the throttle is applied. That "almost perfectly flat" full throttle fuel curve is what most tuners dream of.


__________________
greg brown




714 879 9072
GregBBRD@aol.com

Semi-retired, as of Feb 1, 2023.
The days of free technical advice are over.
Free consultations will no longer be available.
Will still be in the shop, isolated and exclusively working on project cars, developmental work and products, engines and transmissions.
Have fun with your 928's people!






Last edited by GregBBRD; 05-01-2019 at 11:51 PM.
Old 05-02-2019, 12:00 AM
  #2  
docmirror
Shameful Thread Killer
Rennlist Member
 
docmirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rep of Texas, N NM, Rockies, SoCal
Posts: 19,826
Received 75 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

$?
Old 05-02-2019, 12:22 AM
  #3  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,322
Received 1,542 Likes on 1,006 Posts
Default

That's a nice bump-up of the torque curve. Now...

... it just needs to breath above 4.5k-rpm to really take advantage of those light bits and pieces.
Old 05-02-2019, 12:39 AM
  #4  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,417
Received 182 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Looks like the torque peak comes in the early "hump" like the S4 cams....does this engine still have the GT cams? Does the change in bore and stroke negate the effect of the GT cams?
Old 05-02-2019, 01:07 AM
  #5  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
Looks like the torque peak comes in the early "hump" like the S4 cams....does this engine still have the GT cams? Does the change in bore and stroke negate the effect of the GT cams?
Yes. Stock GT cams.

Universally, in the internal combustion engine, increased displacement reduces the effect of a given csmshaft....the increased displacement increases the velocity through the intake port, at any given valve opening.

There's a classic example of this, in the Porsche world. Porsche made a "906" race engine with now world famous "906" camshafts. 2 liter displacement. The engines "came on" at about 6500 rpms. Install those cams in a 3.5 liter 911 engine....completely tame.
Old 05-02-2019, 01:25 AM
  #6  
Tom. M
Deleted
Rennlist Member
 
Tom. M's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,417
Received 182 Likes on 106 Posts
Default

Thanks for the explanation. interesting...

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
Yes. Stock GT cams.

Universally, in the internal combustion engine, increased displacement reduces the effect of a given csmshaft....the increased displacement increases the velocity through the intake port, at any given valve opening.

There's a classic example of this, in the Porsche world. Porsche made a "906" race engine with now world famous "906" camshafts. 2 liter displacement. The engines "came on" at about 6500 rpms. Install those cams in a 3.5 liter 911 engine....completely tame.
Old 05-02-2019, 01:42 AM
  #7  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
That's a nice bump-up of the torque curve. Now...

... it just needs to breath above 4.5k-rpm to really take advantage of those light bits and pieces.
If things happen like they should, the bigger cams and exhaust should take care of this...if I don't run out of intake manifold.

I also thought briefly about retarding the cam timing some. It just runs so darn good, I hate to mess with it.
Old 05-02-2019, 01:43 AM
  #8  
Prelude Guy
Rennlist Member
 
Prelude Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 802
Received 124 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

VERY cool! People like you are the reason why I love older cars more than newer ones!

I'm new the 928 stroker engine options. I notice many references to not using the original crankshaft. Which CS is used? Aftermarket? Are there several "stroker" crank options?
Old 05-02-2019, 01:45 AM
  #9  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom. M
Thanks for the explanation. interesting...
I think it is really cool that you noticed that tidbit.

You're definitely paying attention to the details to see that!
Old 05-02-2019, 01:55 AM
  #10  
The Forgotten On
Rennlist Member
 
The Forgotten On's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Thousand Oaks California
Posts: 4,926
Received 296 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

I wonder what effect this bottom end would have on a 16 valve top end? Might need 1989 944 intake valves to breath properly.

That torque sounds wonderful in a daily paired to an auto. It would cruise so nicely.
Old 05-02-2019, 02:12 AM
  #11  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Prelude Guy
VERY cool! People like you are the reason why I love older cars more than newer ones!
  1. I'm new the 928 stroker engine options. I notice many references to not using the original crankshaft. Which CS is used? Aftermarket? Are there several "stroker" crank options?

For years, the "standard" 928 "stroker" crankshaft has been 95.25mm, which allowed one to build a 6.5 liter (and bigger) 928 engine. Stock 4.5 to 5.0 engines had a stroke of 78.9mm. When Porsche built the 5.4 liter GTS engines, they increased the stroke to 85.9mm.

I've had custom cranks built to my own specifications, for years. I first used Moldex crankshafts (old school fantastic crankshaft maker.) However, in order to more closely "watch", control the process, and build a more modern design crankshaft, I now have my cranks built closer to me, by a very famous crankshaft specialty shop.

Since I have these lightweight, stiffer, modern oil passage, modern design "GTS" crankshafts built for replacements in GTS engines, it was easy to grab one of these, have some custom length rods made, in order to build these 5.8 liter engines.

This has quickly become one of my favorite engines to build. Very responsive....and much easier on the transmissions than the 6.5 liter version, with a minimal loss of horsepower. These engines are very quick reving engines, that really shine in our lightweight 928's.

Additionally, the reduced stroke radically reduces the piston speed, which fits nicely into my future development plans.
Old 05-02-2019, 05:02 AM
  #12  
928 GT R
Rennlist Member
 
928 GT R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Back 0 Beyond
Posts: 5,776
Received 4,939 Likes on 1,911 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregBBRD
which fits nicely into my future development plans.
Development plans???

Custom headers???

Would this 5.8 litter engine be well served by the Devek level 2 header & X-pipe system I have for my (unopened from factory and great running) outlaw GT?

I hate to open that one up, but at 29 years, it has to be coming up on head gaskets... While I'm in there, why not do a build?

You know how it is... Mo Powah = Mo Fun!

Someone else asked about the $$$'s involved? While this can be extremely variable given the state of the engine you receive, what is the cost for a solid GT core?

>
Old 05-02-2019, 10:11 AM
  #13  
SeanR
Rennlist Member
 
SeanR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 35,700
Received 498 Likes on 266 Posts
Default

Awesome work Greg.
Old 05-02-2019, 10:58 AM
  #14  
linderpat
Rennlist Member
 
linderpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 14,394
Received 2,248 Likes on 1,253 Posts
Default

Great work Greg! I am happy that there are those in this community that make it their mission and life's work to not only keep these wonderful cars alive, but improve them incrementally in ways the factory would have done had they continued the model
Old 05-02-2019, 01:39 PM
  #15  
GregBBRD
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
 
GregBBRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anaheim
Posts: 15,219
Received 2,451 Likes on 1,459 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 928 GT R
Development plans???

Custom headers???

Would this 5.8 litter engine be well served by the Devek level 2 header & X-pipe system I have for my (unopened from factory and great running) outlaw GT?

I hate to open that one up, but at 29 years, it has to be coming up on head gaskets... While I'm in there, why not do a build?

You know how it is... Mo Powah = Mo Fun!

Someone else asked about the $$$'s involved? While this can be extremely variable given the state of the engine you receive, what is the cost for a solid GT core?

>
The Devek Level 2 headers are adequate parts and are a close second to my own header system. I would expect good results when used in combination with this engine configuration.

In a few weeks, we will have another 5.8 running, with headers and camshafts, which will be a good comparision, for you.

The 5.8 conversion adds about 10K to the cost of a stock rebuild that needs new pistons.

As a side note, stock GT (and GTS) engines are generally more costly to rebuild, because of the camshaft wear issues associated with those engines.


Quick Reply: Here's a fun little engine. Stock GT that's a 5.8 liter.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:23 PM.