Blown/Damaged Head Gasket?
Unfortunately, I think I have a blown head gasket in my 79 K-Jet supercharged car, but was looking for confirmation of my diagnosis before determining how to proceed with the repair.
A few weeks ago, I developed a hole in a coolant line and sprayed all the coolant out of the car. Where I realized it was happening and the temperature gauge got hot with the flashing red warning, I wasn't in a place where I could stop, not near a store to buy coolant, or make a repair, so I drove a few more miles figuring it would be OK and that an influx of fresh air would keep the temperature partially under control. What contributed to this error in judgement was that prior to that for a couple weeks, my cooling fans weren't kicking on and when the car started to get hot, as long as I was underway on the highway with decent speed, the temperature would drop back down to normal as the air going through the radiator pulled the heat away from the circulating coolant. This is what I thought was taking place on this day and I had just cleared the traffic as the temp started to spike, so thought I was lucky and the temp would be dropping back down any minute, but with the different problem, and coolant having escaped, there was nothing for the air rushing through the radiator to cool and it overheated pretty badly. By the time I got somewhere I'd be able to get supplies and make the repair (a Wal-Mart), it was looking like this https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ea7c73eece.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...561f4ef82e.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d2a391ba8d.jpg In the last picture you can see where they clamp had been placed originally, and it was just to the left of that clamp position where the hose had ballooned out enough for the clamp to cut the hose. What you see in the first 2 pictures, is this puncture in the hose directing a high pressure spray of coolant vapor at the radiator and that's why it looks like the radiator is leaking. This event occurred while the supercharger was deinstalled and having some upgrades which is why it's not visible in the photos. Once things cooled down, there was enough metal pipe inside the black hose, where I could simply move the clamp a little to the right, reclamping the hose upstream of the puncture. I then added about 3.5 gallons of 50/50 mix of anti-freeze and distilled water and was able to drive the rest of the way home without any issues and a completely normal temperature gauge - figured I was lucky and all was good. I then replaced all the coolant hoses and refilled with a fresh mix of 50/50. Over the next couple days, I kept an eye on the coolant level and it dropped a little bit - figured it was air trapped in the system working it's way out through the expansion tank. I topped it up and then decided to do a pressure test. I pumped the system up to 14 psi It takes 1 minute for the pressure to drop from 14 psi to 11 psi another 1 minute to drop from 11 psi to 10 psi and then 2 minutes to drop from 10 psi to 9psi and longer than 2 minutes to drop from 9 psi to 8 psi I don't see any active dripping at any of the hoses. I also tested the cap separately. It says 7 psi on it and seems to hold exactly 7 psi. I wasn't 100% in the first test that I was getting a great seal on the coolant reservoir, so I bought a more complete pressure test set and ran the test again when it arrived and the leak down time from 14 psi was significantly slower. I didn't drive the car that day. The next time I did drive it, it started rougher than usual and as I was backing out of the garage saw some smoke. It cleared up pretty quickly and the car ran fine on that trip. I had just topped up the coolant reservoir before doing the pressure test and noticed some coolant on the ground when I came back out to the car, but it was located right below the overflow hose that's connected to the coolant reservoir - figured I overfilled it and was purging the excess, which I have done a couple times previously. During all this time, the temperature gauge is behaving perfectly, actually better than it has been, but I notice when I park the car that I hear a glugging sound. Happens every 5 to 10 seconds and then the interval gets longer over the course of the next 2 minutes until it stops, but it sounds like it's coming from the fuel tank area and not from the engine. I do some research on this topic and think maybe it's a heat soak issue vaporizing fuel in the rails, but I don't remember it happening previously, even in the middle of the summer, which seems odd. When the noise is happening, loosening the gas cap does not seem to release any pressure or have a vacuum effect and it doesn't stop the noise from finishing it's cycle. I think everything may be OK and I'll check into the shut down glugging sound soon, but this morning I started the car and got the same smoke out the back. Today I got out of the car and walked into the smoke cloud and it's definitely coolant and not oil, so I think when I park the car, the glugging sound may be coolant leaking into the head from the pressure built up in the system and that may be what's also causing the glugging sound and maybe maybe that sound is coming from the coolant reservoir and not the gas tank. When I restart the car, that coolant that leaked in burns and makes the white smoke cloud I'm seeing. When I thought it might be a head gasket, I looked at the dipstick and don't see any foaming like coolant is mixing with the oil, nor do I have any brown oil floating in the coolant reservoir. Does this sound like a head gasket problem or could it possibly be something else? If it is a head gasket, how big is this project on a 16v motor and can it be done with the motor in the car? Is there a DIY somewhere on a 16v motor so I can see what all needs to be removed? This is what the motor looks like with the upgraded supercharger reinstalled and I just got it running really well after finding a boost leak, fixing the electric cooling fans issue, rewiring the heat exchanger pump and repairing the washer fluid bottle so there is actually fluid to pump through the heat exchanger - thought I was in good mechanical shape for SITM and the PEC get together, but now think I have another project to do or have done (probably don't have the time or space) prior. Thanks for reading through all this info and providing your opinions. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a32cc66fe1.jpg |
I had head gaskets blow on the exhaust valve side in my blower motors in the Pantera. It stopped when we O ringed the heads. I'd do a compression test on each cylinder. They don't always pop where you get water in the oil. I've seen them let go and the exhaust gasses push all the coolant out thru the cooling system. BTW, I got my radiator cap from Roger, and I believe it's a 13 pound cap. Also Greg Brown says the head gaskets on these cars are failing due to age related problems. My 89 is supercharged, and I'll be changing head gaskets as a precaution when I do the top end refresh.
|
Seems to me that you might have a small head leak coolant into a cylinder(s), hence the white coolant smelling smoke on startup and the slow pressure drain with the tester.
|
Thanks for the quick responses guys.
|
First and foremost, it will not fix itself.(Captain Obvious at your service)
Second, all you ask above depends on a lot of different things, among them the severity of the leak. Third, I would start by pulling the spark plugs one by one to find out what and which you are dealing with. Once you find out exactly what you are dealing with, then make your decisions. |
Originally Posted by soontobered84
(Post 15709297)
First and foremost, it will not fix itself.(Captain Obvious at your service)
Second, all you ask above depends on a lot of different things, among them the severity of the leak. Third, I would start by pulling the spark plugs one by one to find out what and which you are dealing with. Once you find out exactly what you are dealing with, then make your decisions. Good advice on pulling the plugs and that's what I'll need to do. Might do a compression test at the same time as Polecat suggests. I would assume if the leak was bad I'd see the coolant smoke all the time, and not just on an initial start after an overnight sit, so I'm guessing it's pretty minor at this stage, but will still need to be fixed. |
Pete, if it leaks into a cylinder, and you turn over the engine you could bend a rod. You can't compress a liquid. Do as John suggests, and a bore scope is a good idea too. If you pull one head you might as well do both. I'm not sure if yours is the engine that has head studs as opposed to bolts. You might have to pull the engine, to change out the head gaskets. Good Luck!
|
Yes, I'd do a compression test as well. Steam-cleaned plugs will tell you which cylinders are affected.
Sounds like a good plan. I just hope you didn't warp your heads. |
While starting your car at this point does imply risk of rod damage, the smell of burning coolant is distinct.
You suggested that you can smell coolant in the exhaust cloud. Be sure to perform the start-up (white smoke) test on a low humidity day with the wind coming from behind the car so you isolate the exhaust smoke and do not accidentally smell coolant burning off in your engine compartment. Springtime is a notoriously humid period and it is possible (although unlikely given the overheating event) to confuse the white smoke with normal condensation burn off. The above suggested visual examinations of the plugs, scope and compression tests should confirm which cylinder/s you are dealing with. If doing one head, do them both! It is never worth it to skimp on doing a complete job when you are performing all the labor to get in there! Sorry that this happened, but we are all going to have to do our heads eventually and it seems that doing them sooner rather than later is a reasonable maintenance item at this time in our cars life cycle. P.S. Love your collection of cars! :bowdown: |
I have removed 16v heads in each of my 1985s one with the block in one by pulling the engine. Yes it can be done in the car but really pulling the engine is not difficult...just opens up a bigger rabbit hole....
If you take it out and fully apart you can do "everything" and know where you are. |
Pete as others have suggested, I would concur with the pull the plugs.
You could also look into the cylinder and see if it has coolant in it before turning it over, My Swiss car had this two cylinders had green deposits on the plug tips. Usually the right cylinder bank is the one most effected by coolant issues since its got a source fore air intrusion via the HCV Please post a picture of the plugs, that will tell what plug/cylinder is leaking. Since you didnt provide any background info about your engine , IE it still has the original HGs or not. If they have never been done then they will need to be. this is a wear item at this point. The heads can be removed in the car, this block has studs, but the 16 valve heads are not as big as the 32 V type. And the cam towers will have to come off first, a PITA in the car In reality its much easier to work on this engine out of the car. |
If you plan on doing just the heads, leave the engine in - it's A LOT more work pulling and reinstalling the engine.
If the engine requires a going-thru, then pull it, and take your time with it. |
I have some other engine leaks (pan gasket, something up higher, etc) so this is probably the straw that's going to require engine removal. I'm making some inquiries to people that could do this work for me and a few other things as I don't have the time or space to tackle this currently and don't want to be without the car for the 6 months it would take me to do it.
|
Maybe it's time to try and locate a solid Euro motor...
|
pull the plugs. if coolant is leaking into a cylinder, one plug will be "steam cleaned" and cleaner than the rest.
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15709636)
Maybe it's time to try and locate a solid Euro motor...
|
Originally Posted by 928sg
(Post 15709742)
pull the plugs. if coolant is leaking into a cylinder, one plug will be "steam cleaned" and cleaner than the rest.
|
Allow engine to cool down.
Remove spark plugs. If the problem is not obvious by looking at the spark plugs: Install pressure tester. Apply pressure to cooling system and allow it to leak down 2-3 times. Have someone crank the engine over, while you observe the open spark plug holes. Any sign of "Old Faithful" is bad. |
Pete --
If you don't already have one of those little bore-scope cameras with the webserver attached (typically <$30 on Amazon...) here's a great time to add one. Coolant in a cylinder will wash a plug, but that may or may no be obvious depending on how white they are in normal driving. The top of the piston, however, is an easy telltale for lots of combustion issues including detonation and coolant leaking. Both are of serious interest in your supercharged car. Coolant leaking into the cylinder will quickly steam-clean the piston tops to shiny metal, while the "normal" cylinders will have tan to dark grey deposits. Detonation offers a radial bloom from the common point of detonation, sometimes with what look like BB or ball-peen hammer impacts. Among the look with the camera, the plug inspection, a compression test and the coolant system pressure/leakdown test, you'll have enough hints to ID the failure and location. If you don't have the schedule available for a DIY repair, your best option may be to have the car transported back to Carl for the whole reseal/refresh effort. That virtually eliminates possible issues with having all the supercharger bits go back on correctly. Carl mentioned in the electrical-fire thread that he's headed to Arkansas this spring with the race car and transporter. If he makes a right instead of a left on his way home, he'd wind up in Clemson to pick the car up. According to my from-the-farthest-corner-of-the-lower-48 nav skills anyway. |
How new a motor could I run with the rest of my current setup as a plug and play? Would a 4.7 L-Jet work and provide even more power or does it need to be a K-Jet whether US or Euro? Are the electrics the same like wiring harnesses and such?
Seems like if I'm pulling the motor anyway and then the heads and might have to machine the block and refurb the heads that I could do this same work to a different motor with other advantages, if there are some. Maybe upgrade the headers at the same time. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15709285)
Thanks for the quick responses guys.
2 - No. The coolant isn't actually burning, it's just vaporizing to steam and going out the exhaust pipe. 3 - Yes, it could. Maybe. Or maybe not. 4 - Maybe. If you see that the top of one piston (or maybe more than one) is clean, while the rest have the normal carbon, that would be a good indicator. As noted, pulling spark plugs which you'd have to do to do this, would likely tell you the exact same thing. 5 - Maybe one side, maybe both. See below. You also asked if this can be done with the motor in the car. For a 16v motor, it's rather difficult to get the cam tower off with the motor in. Passenger side worse than driver. General rule for cam tower is that one can be done with motor in, but if you are doing both, it's easier to pull the motor. Not sure if getting the cam tower off gives enough room to get the head out 'easy'. In this case, I would guess that you've 'failed' a HG. Coolant in the cylinder (coming out the exhaust) is a fairly definitive indicator. As was noted, I hope you didn't warp your head(s) when you got it hot. Although that generally results in a more catastrophic HG failure. The big question is whether or not you've damaged both HGs. And if one is still intact, is there damage that hasn't 'let go' yet? Did you weaken it enough that it will fail in the future. It would really, really suck to fix one side and then have the other fail in a few weeks. Have the HGs been done in the past? Or are they original? If they are original, I'd suggest biting the bullet, yanking the motor & replacing both HGs. If they've been done fairly recently, that will be a tougher decision. Standard disclaimer: My $0.02, worth what you paid for it, not a professional mechanic, didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night, use at own risk, close cover before striking, contains flammable gas under pressure. :) Edit to add:
Originally Posted by DrBob
Carl mentioned in the electrical-fire thread that he's headed to Arkansas this spring with the race car and transporter. If he makes a right instead of a left on his way home, he'd wind up in Clemson to pick the car up. According to my from-the-farthest-corner-of-the-lower-48 nav skills anyway.
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15710205)
How new a motor could I run with the rest of my current setup as a plug and play? Would a 4.7 L-Jet work and provide even more power or does it need to be a K-Jet whether US or Euro? Are the electrics the same like wiring harnesses and such?
Seems like if I'm pulling the motor anyway and then the heads and might have to machine the block and refurb the heads that I could do this same work to a different motor with other advantages, if there are some. Maybe upgrade the headers at the same time. The decision to drive it a "few more miles" was the exactly the same decision as pulling it out and attempting to rebuild it....even if you didn't recognize it, as such, right at that moment. The "Fat Lady" has sang, left the building, gone home, and is already sleeping. Any of the '78/'79 US engines are "plug and play", obviously. Any '78-'83 Euro engine is also "plug and play". (Although the odds of finding any '78-'83 engine that is good enough to just drop in and supercharge are very, very low.) Every other engine will require modifications to the electrical and fuel system. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15710323)
Yes. Any engine that got as hot as you described is probably going to need more than just head gaskets.
The decision to drive it a few more miles to the nearest Wallmart was the same as deciding to pull it out and attempt to rebuild it. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15710328)
So Greg, how's your schedule?
When trying to do things as perfect as possible....one "little snag" can set us back weeks. Seems like everything we have seen for the last six months has multiple "little snags". The reality of working on older cars is that we don't see many cars for routine service things....almost everything we do is something that no one else can figure out how to fix or some sort of major trauma. |
So --- We skip the diagnostic steps entirely and simply jump to a GB rebuild?
Or --- new GB motor? If you do not want to start it again, at least pull the plugs and report the findings. Photos would help create a reference. Some of us want a confirmed diagnosis before ripping our motors out or apart... Geeezzzzzz . |
An LS engine would go perfect with your drivetrain!
|
Originally Posted by 928 GT R
(Post 15711273)
So --- We skip the diagnostic steps entirely and simply jump to a GB rebuild?
Or --- new GB motor? If you do not want to start it again, at least pull the plugs and report the findings. Photos would help create a reference. Some of us want a confirmed diagnosis before ripping our motors out or apart... Geeezzzzzz . Just trying to understand options providing the problem is what everyone including me thinks it probably is. Doesn't seem like there are too many ways to make a coolant cloud on start-up which never once happened prior to the overheating event, and has now happened twice in the same week. Same situation for that glug glug sound I hear on shutdown now, which I thought might be air trapped in the cooling system since I had refilled it, but now think it's coolant running into the head and the air it's displacing rising in the system. There are a few things all pointing in the same direction, but will pull plugs to confirm and post what they look like. In the event it is the head gaskets, if I found an M28/10 K-Jet motor (Euro), how.much of what I already have on my engine that is new and known good could move over to it, specifically the CIS fuel distributor, air sensor, WUR, crank pulley for the SC, 200 amp alternator, a/c, etc. I know the spider manifold and legs are different and larger on the Euro. If I end up sourcing a new motor, does it matter if it was the version for a 5-speed manual or for an automatic (M28/10 vs M28/09 or M28/11 or M28/12)? |
Hi Pete. Sorry about your problem. There is a kit that tests for combustion gases in the coolant system. I forget exactly how it works, but not too expensive and supposedly very sensitive.
Maybe this is the one I got. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15711368)
Hi Pete. Sorry about your problem. There is a kit that tests for combustion gases in the coolant system. I forget exactly how it works, but not too expensive and supposedly very sensitive.
Maybe this is the one I got. https://www.amazon.com/Block-Tester-...-2-spons&psc=1 Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15711318)
Nah, we'll be doing all of that, hopefully this week - at least the pulling the plugs portion and boroscoping into the cylinders (I have a mobile phone boroscope, which probably isn't great, but should do).
Just trying to understand options providing the problem is what everyone including me thinks it probably is. Doesn't seem like there are too many ways to make a coolant cloud on start-up which never once happened prior to the overheating event, and has now happened twice in the same week. Same situation for that glug glug sound I hear on shutdown now, which I thought might be air trapped in the cooling system since I had refilled it, but now think it's coolant running into the head and the air it's displacing rising in the system. ? EDIT - my car never overheated, so the fact that yours did may present issues other than the gasket, as you know. https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...s-back-on.html |
Originally Posted by BRB-83-911SC
(Post 15711422)
I just posted this in the other Head Gasket thread. At the beginning of my thread below, I describe the symptoms I encountered, which sound similar to yours. Further into the thread you can see the forensics of the gasket. I got lucky and didn't have any corrosion issues to deal with. It has been 7 years and 16k miles since, with no issues.
EDIT - my car never overheated, so the fact that yours did may present issues other than the gasket, as you know. https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...s-back-on.html |
Rather than a full motor replacement, how about a just a set of Euro S heads? That would give you bigger valves, but allow you to use most of your setup as is.
Having done it both ways, I really recommend pulling the motor, even to replace a head or a cam carrier gasket. It is just not that hard of a pull, the overall work is less, and the quality of the end job is better. |
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15712448)
Rather than a full motor replacement, how about a just a set of Euro S heads? That would give you bigger valves, but allow you to use most of your setup as is.
Having done it both ways, I really recommend pulling the motor, even to replace a head or a cam carrier gasket. It is just not that hard of a pull, the overall work is less, and the quality of the end job is better. That's a great idea and I came to a similar conclusion earlier today. I have a pair of Euro heads from an M28/11 motor on hold that I will purchase if I have to remove mine to replace the head gaskets. I'll have them gone through and refurbished if they're pitted, then have a 3-angle valve-job and head restoration performed, then reinstall those on my motor. As you say, that will improve the breathing, and probably even more so with the supercharger. I'm probably going to add the rest of the Euro intake pieces as well - intake distributor (already have the legs), Flap Nozzle / throttle body to realize the full benefit and may renew the injectors while I'm doing all of that. This should be much easier than the motor swap, considering how packed the front of my engine bay is with the custom intake, radiator, and supercharger setup, and I don't have a lot of other while you're in there stuff to do since motor mounts are pretty new. We'll see what tonight's spark plug pulls reveal. Ideally, there's not much coolant sitting in the cylinders as I'd like to be able to start the car one more time to put it on the lift and swap it with the 914 while I wait on parts, if that's the direction I go. |
Advice I'm getting on whether to pull the motor for this job or to do it with the engine in the car, since it's a 16v seems fairly evenly split, so I've added a poll to the thread so I can see how wide the overall distribution is. At this point I'm leaning toward doing it with the motor in the car, but the poll may sway my decision, and if I'm pulling the motor, that may change what I decide to do about repair or replace.
|
If the Euro heads you have lined up don't work out I have a spare set somewhere in LA. Bought them many years ago just because and have never even unpacked them.
|
Pete--
I voted to pull the motor for the headgaskets. Even though you added the unrealistic qualifier that this is the only thing you will do. There's No Such Thing as "just replacing the headgaskets" on a 16V motor. For all the things including the heads and such, engine in the stand is just so much easier than engine in the car. There have been more than a few "engine pull parties" that let the starving masses help out; supply pizza and suds after it's out, and two problems are easily solved at once. -- Having larger Euro valves or intake runners is almost inconsequential with the supercharger. The limitations on the SC car are related to cylinder pressures & temperatures, and subsequent detonation. If the runners or valves are a little smaller, the boost pressure is raised with a pulley change to make up for it. |
Originally Posted by dr bob
(Post 15710060)
Pete --
If you don't already have one of those little bore-scope cameras with the webserver attached (typically <$30 on Amazon...) here's a great time to add one. Coolant in a cylinder will wash a plug, but that may or may no be obvious depending on how white they are in normal driving. The top of the piston, however, is an easy telltale for lots of combustion issues including detonation and coolant leaking. Both are of serious interest in your supercharged car. Coolant leaking into the cylinder will quickly steam-clean the piston tops to shiny metal, while the "normal" cylinders will have tan to dark grey deposits. Detonation offers a radial bloom from the common point of detonation, sometimes with what look like BB or ball-peen hammer impacts. Among the look with the camera, the plug inspection, a compression test and the coolant system pressure/leakdown test, you'll have enough hints to ID the failure and location. If you don't have the schedule available for a DIY repair, your best option may be to have the car transported back to Carl for the whole reseal/refresh effort. That virtually eliminates possible issues with having all the supercharger bits go back on correctly. Carl mentioned in the electrical-fire thread that he's headed to Arkansas this spring with the race car and transporter. If he makes a right instead of a left on his way home, he'd wind up in Clemson to pick the car up. According to my from-the-farthest-corner-of-the-lower-48 nav skills anyway. +1. Visual in the cylinder is best if the plugs are not already wet. |
I voted the way we would do the job, in my shop, if I thought the engine was fine and I just had to remove the heads. (Like the survey said.) No question, leave the engine in the car, in that situation.
This engine, which got really damn hot, would come out of the car.....again, no question. If the pistons and bores are not scuffed, it's because they are completely worn out. |
Originally Posted by dr bob
(Post 15712597)
Having larger Euro valves or intake runners is almost inconsequential with the supercharger. The limitations on the SC car are related to cylinder pressures & temperatures, and subsequent detonation. If the runners or valves are a little smaller, the boost pressure is raised with a pulley change to make up for it. |
After plug removal, the news looks to be as expected. #6 has coolant in the cylinder, probably #7 too and #2 and #3 are questionable too. Here are the photos so you can see for yourself and advise. Captions are below each photo
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ec490ccc7d.jpg All Plugs https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e3e93b27e0.jpg 1-4 https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b1d38cc2dc.jpg 5-8 https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c9339afbc7.jpg 1-2 https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...626b483b2f.jpg 3-4 https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b2b167ab59.jpg 5-6 https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71d1712f95.jpg 7-8 And here are the boroscope results. Plugs did not actually seem especially tight which is probably why even outside the motor and on the base of some of the plugs, you can see the burned coolant remnants. Photos are captions with the cylinder # and then a letter for each photo in that cylinder https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c74d66a546.jpg 1A https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7128dd64f8.jpg 1B https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...52d230ae64.jpg 2A https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8b41bfe545.jpg 2B https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e18a71db48.jpg 2C https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2aca0b927.jpg 3 - this one was do close to top of the stroke this was the only shot I could get https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...68a95da2a7.jpg 4A https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8c8feab2db.jpg 4B https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4403cb40f5.jpg 5A https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ba0c1dd50a.jpg 5B https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b79610c61e.jpg 5C https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5cd2a32ffc.jpg 6A https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...64e962a5cb.jpg 6B https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c872d98f2b.jpg 6C https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6cfb21559d.jpg 7A https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...326b2ef651.jpg 7B https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9585567c77.jpg 7C https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3cdc6bc1e.jpg 8A https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2fa35e8e79.jpg 8B Based on these findings are we concerned about the rest of the health of the motor where the safer bet is to replace what was a solid motor that ran well with a rock-steady idle with a complete different engine? I don't want to go to the trouble of doing the heads only to fire it back up and find out the bearings, crank or something else are actually bad. I have driven it twice since the first coolant cloud and it seemed to run fine. Next question - it's on the floor under my lift with the 914 above it. Looks like it's not going anywhere for a while. If I leave all the plugs out and loosen the coolant reservoir cap so it can't build pressure, can I turn it over to push any coolant out the plug holes, reinstall the plugs and then run it for 5 minutes in order to be able to swap these 2 cars around or am I going to have to do that by pushing it? All advice welcome and appreciated. Thanks. |
Awesome thread and documentation! Sorry I could not participate today (Mom suddenly in hospital).
Again much appreciation to everyone for sharing their thoughts and insight. It will be fun to see what Pete does with this engine given it resides in such a unique and special car. :cheers: Enjoy! |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15712794)
After plug removal, the news looks to be as expected. #6 has coolant in the cylinder, probably #7 too and #2 and #3 are questionable too. Here are the photos so you can see for yourself and advise. Captions are below each photo
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ec490ccc7d.jpg All Plugs https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e3e93b27e0.jpg 1-4 https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b1d38cc2dc.jpg 5-8 https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c9339afbc7.jpg 1-2 https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...626b483b2f.jpg 3-4 https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b2b167ab59.jpg 5-6 https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71d1712f95.jpg 7-8 And here are the boroscope results. Plugs did not actually seem especially tight which is probably why even outside the motor and on the base of some of the plugs, you can see the burned coolant remnants. Photos are captions with the cylinder # and then a letter for each photo in that cylinder https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c74d66a546.jpg 1A https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7128dd64f8.jpg 1B https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...52d230ae64.jpg 2A https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8b41bfe545.jpg 2B https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e18a71db48.jpg 2C https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2aca0b927.jpg 3 - this one was do close to top of the stroke this was the only shot I could get https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...68a95da2a7.jpg 4A https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8c8feab2db.jpg 4B https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4403cb40f5.jpg 5A https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ba0c1dd50a.jpg 5B https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b79610c61e.jpg 5C https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5cd2a32ffc.jpg 6A https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...64e962a5cb.jpg 6B https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c872d98f2b.jpg 6C https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6cfb21559d.jpg 7A https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...326b2ef651.jpg 7B https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9585567c77.jpg 7C https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3cdc6bc1e.jpg 8A https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2fa35e8e79.jpg 8B Based on these findings are we concerned about the rest of the health of the motor where the safer bet is to replace what was a solid motor that ran well with a rock-steady idle with a complete different engine? I don't want to go to the trouble of doing the heads only to fire it back up and find out the bearings, crank or something else are actually bad. I have driven it twice since the first coolant cloud and it seemed to run fine. Next question - it's on the floor under my lift with the 914 above it. Looks like it's not going anywhere for a while. If I leave all the plugs out and loosen the coolant reservoir cap so it can't build pressure, can I turn it over to push any coolant out the plug holes, reinstall the plugs and then run it for 5 minutes in order to be able to swap these 2 cars around or am I going to have to do that by pushing it? All advice welcome and appreciated. Thanks. |
So, the outside of the spark plugs had water/coolant sitting around them....that's the corrosion on the metal. Note that this stain on the spark plugs is not coolant from the inside of the engine!
Is the coolant sitting on the top of the pistons from the inside of the engine, or did that run down the spark plug hole when you took the spark plugs out? Crank the engine over, with the spark plugs out....several revolutions to "clear" out all the coolant that is currently in the engine. With your bore scope, confirm all the coolant is gone. Install the pressure tester and pump it up and let it leak down a few times. Recheck with the bore scope. If the coolant comes back, it's from the inside, not from the outside of the spark plugs. BTW....those bores look pretty good, from what I can tell from your pictures. I'm thinking remove the heads, from what I see in those pictures. And yes, if you crank the engine over with the spark plugs out (blowing out the coolant from inside the cylinders), you can then install the spark plugs and start the engine to move things around. (No pressure on the cooling system, from your tester, but you can leave the tester on the tank.) Just don't shut it off, if it builds pressure in the cooling system....that will push coolant back into the cylinders. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15713238)
So, the outside of the spark plugs had water/coolant sitting around them....that's the corrosion on the metal. Note that this stain on the spark plugs is not coolant from the inside of the engine!
Is the coolant sitting on the top of the pistons from the inside of the engine, or did that run down the spark plug hole when you took the spark plugs out? Crank the engine over, with the spark plugs out....several revolutions to "clear" out all the coolant that is currently in the engine. With your bore scope, confirm all the coolant is gone. Install the pressure tester and pump it up and let it leak down a few times. Recheck with the bore scope. If the coolant comes back, it's from the inside, not from the outside of the spark plugs. BTW....those bores look pretty good, from what I can tell from your pictures. I'm thinking remove the heads, from what I see in those pictures. And yes, if you crank the engine over with the spark plugs out (blowing out the coolant from inside the cylinders), you can then install the spark plugs and start the engine to move things around. (No pressure on the cooling system, from your tester, but you can leave the tester on the tank.) Just don't shut it off, if it builds pressure in the cooling system....that will push coolant back into the cylinders. I'm glad to hear your input on the condition of the bores. This motor seemed very good other than a few oil leaks - nice steady idle, smooth, etc and this project will be much more affordable if I only work it from the head perspective and not the complete motor replacement one if you think my odds are good to salvage what I have without tearing it apart. For a motor oil I run Driven DT50 synthetic which according to Lake Speed at Driven will support temperatures of up to 350 degrees for short periods, so maybe that was a contributor to not having more damage and the car seeming to run fine both during the event and now afterwards. Sounds like you think I can start it and move it onto the lift once the cylinders are free of coolant while I figure out the best way to go. Right now, I have a few options:
Which of these options seem good and which are not as good? |
Sad news, Pete. I hope you can get it fixed soon.
Good luck, Dave |
If you score Euro heads, then also find some Euro cams too.
They are more supercharger-friendly in that they'll lower the dynamic compression ratio of the engine, thus, help minimize detonation. Classic failure mode of a supercharged engine is a blown head gasket, and usually caused by detonation. |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15713724)
If you score Euro heads, then also find some Euro cams too.
They are more supercharger-friendly in that they'll lower the dynamic compression ratio of the engine, thus, help minimize detonation. Classic failure mode of a supercharged engine is a blown head gasket, and usually caused by detonation. 83/84 US cars were 9.3:1 84-86 Euros were the highest at 10.4:1 85-86 US cars were at 10.1:1 then everything after that, except the GTS was 10.0:1 with the GTS being slightly higher at 10.4:1 If I end up putting heads onto my block, I'm going to install them with upgraded gaskets from 928MS. If I end up installing the 4.7 rebuilt motor, I'm going to leave things assembled as they are and drop it in. That motor would have a compression ration of 9.3:1 which should be OK. Probably going to install new fuel injectors just to be save if I go that route, unless I also change over to the L-Jet fueling system that's available with that motor. Any opinion on K-Jet vs L-Jet for supercharged setups - avoiding a computer and tuning manually with mixture seems easier. |
I would talk to Carl about L-jet vs K-jet. He has experience with both .
good luck Dave |
Originally Posted by polecat702
(Post 15709268)
I had head gaskets blow on the exhaust valve side in my blower motors in the Pantera. It stopped when we O ringed the heads. I'd do a compression test on each cylinder. They don't always pop where you get water in the oil. I've seen them let go and the exhaust gasses push all the coolant out thru the cooling system. BTW, I got my radiator cap from Roger, and I believe it's a 13 pound cap. Also Greg Brown says the head gaskets on these cars are failing due to age related problems. My 89 is supercharged, and I'll be changing head gaskets as a precaution when I do the top end refresh.
Call me when you do that. I'd be happy to come out and help you pull the motor and do the heads. It's easier with extra sets of hands. |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15714321)
I would talk to Carl about L-jet vs K-jet. He has experience with both .
good luck Dave He says the K-Jet is a better fueling platform for supercharging providing it's in good shape (which mine is), so I'll be staying with what I have on that, but probably installing with new injectors and seals just to be safe, and some braided stainless fuel lines I've found. |
Pete, sorry to hear all this, hope it works out, and I hope you can get it done before SITM |
I bought the recently rebuilt 4.7L M28/19 motor today from user BC for very reasonable money - thanks BC! It was previously in ladybug's car.
So that's the plan...pull the motor and replace it with this 4.7 and then reinstall my K-Jet setup and supercharger onto it. Also going to install new injectors and Greg Brown fuel lines. The motor will be starting the trip my way from San Diego sometime next week and I'll start doing prep work on my car in the meantime as I've now made a decent list of stuff I am going to do. Hoping I can get it all put together in time for SITM. If there's a good 16v Engine Pulling for Dummies (Rookies) writeup with step by step instructions someone could point me to, that would be awesome. I'll pull the heads from my current motor after I get everything else done and decide what to do with it. |
Originally Posted by jeff spahn
(Post 15714329)
Joe
Call me when you do that. I'd be happy to come out and help you pull the motor and do the heads. It's easier with extra sets of hands. We'll tool around in the Pantera this time too. Gotta start driving it. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15715304)
I bought the recently rebuilt 4.7L M28/19 motor today from user BC for very reasonable money - thanks BC! It was previously in ladybug's car.
So that's the plan...pull the motor and replace it with this 4.7 and then reinstall my K-Jet setup and supercharger onto it. Also going to install new injectors and Greg Brown fuel lines. The motor will be starting the trip my way from San Diego sometime next week and I'll start doing prep work on my car in the meantime as I've now made a decent list of stuff I am going to do. Hoping I can get it all put together in time for SITM. If there's a good 16v Engine Pulling for Dummies (Rookies) writeup with step by step instructions someone could point me to, that would be awesome. I'll pull the heads from my current motor after I get everything else done and decide what to do with it. |
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15717552)
The motor removal is the hard part. Putting it back in is super fun. I stole the pallet from Costco today so ON SCHEDULE!
|
All easy stuff, especially on a CIS car.
Remove hood Unhook exhaust Pull fan and radiator Unhook 14 pin electrical connector Disconnect 2x fuel lines and throttle cable. Disconnect driveline at clutch Drop the clutch? (don't totally remember if I pull the clutch down or not. Probably makes the pull easier if you do as otherwise it has to come pretty far forward) Bell housing bolts and motor mounts. Pull baby pull. WSM has a good write up, I think. |
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15717634)
All easy stuff, especially on a CIS car.
Remove hood Unhook exhaust Pull fan and radiator Unhook 14 pin electrical connector Disconnect 2x fuel lines and throttle cable. Disconnect driveline at clutch Drop the clutch? (don't totally remember if I pull the clutch down or not. Probably makes the pull easier if you do as otherwise it has to come pretty far forward) Bell housing bolts and motor mounts. Pull baby pull. WSM has a good write up, I think. Does the hood really need to come off, or can you just disconnect the struts and make it more vertical or pad it lay it back toward the windshield. I'm planning to put it on the lift so I can access things from above and below as need be, then roll it off the lift so I can get a cherry picker with leveler under it to lift the motor out. |
Hi Pete,
The hood comes off easily and one person can do it. I popped the struts, then laid blankets across the engine and fenders. Then I lowered the hood until almost closed, but I could still access the hinge bolts. Pull the bolts and walk around to the front of the car and lift the aluminum hood. Very easy, and the access is vast. Good luck, Dave |
Mark the position of the hood hinges with a sharpee. If you have fender service guards this would be a good time to use them as it is easy to bump the hood against a fender as you are lifting it, if you are doing it by your self.
|
Disconnect the engine at the torque-tube and bellhousing. Pull the engine with bellhousing attached.
Less is more at this stage. |
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15719335)
Mark the position of the hood hinges with a sharpee. If you have fender service guards this would be a good time to use them as it is easy to bump the hood against a fender as you are lifting it, if you are doing it by your self.
|
Thanks guys. Keep the tips coming.
My car has the Z06 6-speed if that effects any of this, like the bell housing suggestion. |
What spec (size, length, thread pitch, and grade) mounting bolts will I need to put the engine on a Sunex 8300 engine stand once I've pulled it?
|
Umm disconnect the bell housing from the engine, remove the rear trans mounts to cross member
and slide it back an inch or so, Put a small block of wood under the TT at the small chassis cross memeber the TT will rest on it. Then pull the engine up about 4 inches then slide it forward while lifting. The bell housing will hit the chassis if its not removed from the engine . NOTE if you have a clutch then also remove the clutch |
Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
(Post 15720221)
Umm disconnect the bell housing from the engine, remove the rear trans mounts to cross member
and slide it back an inch or so, Put a small block of wood under the TT at the small chassis cross memeber the TT will rest on it. Then pull the engine up about 4 inches then slide it forward while lifting. The bell housing will hit the chassis if its not removed from the engine . NOTE if you have a clutch then also remove the clutch But we've removed/installed many engines bellhousing on, and it's far easier working on and setting up the clutch, and unistalling/installing the clutch-fork with the engine out. The tricky part is removing/installing the torque tube bolts, but even that is easy enough, just need to be patient. |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15720744)
Sure, you can do it this way.
But we've removed/installed many engines bellhousing on, and it's far easier working on and setting up the clutch, and uninstalling/installing the clutch-fork with the engine out. The tricky part is removing/installing the torque tube bolts, but even that is easy enough, just need to be patient. |
I don't know if there are any threads on it.
|
And along those lines, there is no need to drop the exhaust system. Simply zip-tie it in-place, and only remove the 'collector' bolts.
Engine will come right out with exhaust in place, and one less thing to hook-up afterwards. |
I've always found it easier to do it like Stan does. Unbolt the housing from the engine and leave it connected to the torque tube.
|
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 15720956)
I've always found it easier to do it like Stan does. Unbolt the housing from the engine and leave it connected to the torque tube.
|
OK, I'll do it that way and leave the bell-housing on the torque tube.
I'll be pulling the clutch pack anyway as I'm going to replace my spec friction discs with OEM ones to finally eliminate the grabbiness of the engagement that has bothered me since the beginning. My car does have the upgraded 80-83 dual disc clutch with intermediate plate and all that was new during the build, so just doing the friction discs which I already have on-hand. Thanks. |
By all means do what you think is best.
My comments are for 5-speeds only. I got sick and tired with wrestling with the clutch-fork and ball-cup bushing after dropping the engine back in. I had to use a crow-bar and large screwdriver to get the fork over the bushing. Perhaps autos are easier. |
Mine's not an auto or a 5-speed (6-speed) so guess I'll pull the clutch pack and then see what looks easier. My plan is to get a Cherry picker with a balancer assembly so I can angle the motor as needed coming out, then level it off. I still need to search for the engine hoist attachment points to see how all of that is done once I get everything off and disconnected.
I sure am going to learn a lot about my 928 if nothing else - maybe even enough to get my son one when he's old enough, because after this whole process, I might have a spare motor if my current one is OK. |
Hi Pete,
There are a couple of things to do while the engine is out, that are difficult otherwise. One is the A/C line along the right fender. I'm sure there are others, and you should look around for them to save yourself grief. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15721260)
Hi Pete,
There are a couple of things to do while the engine is out, that are difficult otherwise. .... I'm sure there are others, and you should look around for them to save yourself grief. Good luck, Dave |
Anyone have an old scrap square tooth timing belt they want to send me for the cost of postage. I want to cut it up. Looking to paint the non-running surfaces of my steel timing pulleys (cam, oil pump, crank, etc) and want to mask off the toothed portion with sections of an old belt during the process.
Also, anyone have scrap 3 bolt header flanges? I'm looking for 2 of them to make an adapter to go between the 85/86 round tube SS headers and my current stainless Y-Pipe and would prefer to not cut and weld either of those, unless someone actually has one of those adapter pieces around. Thanks. |
Here we go.
Battery disconnected, hinge positions marked, and hood off. I'll work on disassembly and removal while the 4.7L is en route. Sunex 8300 GB Engine stand is assembled (thanks for the recommendation in another thread Greg Brown), Harbor Freight Shop Hoist with pneumatic ram upgrade and balancer assembly is on hand to be put together. Waiting on some parts too. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...81a1f23bba.jpg |
Pretty productive first few hours
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...78c88893d8.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...83b1bd8207.jpg |
Good progress Pete. Wish I could come help, but I'm swamped. I hope it goes fairly smooth.
|
Nice job so far.
Friendly tip - whenever you start to feel impatient while working on the car, put down the wrench and take a break. |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15734475)
Nice job so far.
Friendly tip - whenever you start to feel impatient while working on the car, put down the wrench and take a break. |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15734475)
Nice job so far.
Friendly tip - whenever you start to feel impatient while working on the car, put down the wrench and take a break. |
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.
|
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 15736996)
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.
|
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 15736996)
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.
You can actually see it folded down under the boat trailer in the coolant draining photo. I'll let you know how it works with the motor mounted as I'm going to remove and reseal the oil pan and install a stud kit, so I'll be cranking it upside down once on the stand. |
What's the consensus on whether I should upgrade to the Porken tensioner while I'm doing all of this on a 16v motor if I have a functioning regular tensioner?
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15737449)
What's the consensus on whether I should upgrade to the Porken tensioner while I'm doing all of this on a 16v motor if I have a functioning regular tensioner?
|
Originally Posted by soontobered84
(Post 15737881)
How difficult will it be to access your tensioner to retension after 1500 miles? How difficult is it to access your tensioner for anything with the extra apparatus you have installed at the front of your engine?
Pulling the airbox is easy, but the supercharger, not so much. With the Porken Tensioner, is it self-adjusting like a normal serpentine belt tensioner, so no break in or periodic adjustments, whereas the OEM one requires manual adjustment? If so, there's my answer. Thanks and let me know. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15737901)
Quite difficult.
Pulling the airbox is easy, but the supercharger, not so much. With the Porken Tensioner, is it self-adjusting like a normal serpentine belt tensioner, so no break in or periodic adjustments, whereas the OEM one requires manual adjustment? If so, there's my answer. Thanks and let me know. Somehow I thought you might lean that way if you needed to remove the supercharger to access the tensioner. :) |
I am sending tensioners Pete, but I was going to say I would strongly recommend the Ken's tensioner in this case.
|
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15738379)
I am sending tensioners Pete, but I was going to say I would strongly recommend the Ken's tensioner in this case.
|
Hi Pete,
I have the Porkensioner also. It works just fine, and it's also possible to remove or release tension on it from below, with the supercharger in place. I needed to do that when I corrected a one-tooth error on my timing belt install. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 15736996)
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.
Harbor Freight Engine Stand... |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15739107)
|
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 15739380)
Got one of those, actually two and while they have worked for me in the past, I'm not a fan. The one I'm working on right now Cheap-o-that works at the house came with the engine I just completed and it's much, much sturdier than the one you posted and I've been using. Hated how my old ones wiggled around on the set pins. Guess I"m getting old, I want sturdy one with a crank so I don't have to muscle it around.
Just out of curiosity, how can yours rated at 1,000 lbs be sturdier than mine rated at 2,000 lbs? |
Pete You can get that adapter for the X pipe from Motorsport in Utah
|
Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
(Post 15740653)
Pete You can get that adapter for the X pipe from Motorsport in Utah
The headers arrived yesterday too (thanks Jim). Motor and related parts have been shipped too. I need to order some things from Mark and Roger, but in about a week, I'll be the hold-up and should have 90% of what I need on hand. |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15739656)
LOL, I've got the one you posted, and do not like it at all. Different strokes I guess, glad there's plenty of options.
Just out of curiosity, how can yours rated at 1,000 lbs be sturdier than mine rated at 2,000 lbs? |
Originally Posted by SeanR
(Post 15740767)
Read my post a little closer and you will have a better chance at understanding what I said.
Again, I have both, and their listed specs accurately reflect my experience with them. I had to put a jack under the engine's nose to help support the then-brand-new 1,000 lb capacity stand. For the 2,000 lb capacity stand, no additional support has ever been necessary. Because of this, I've never used the 1,000 lb stand again. So, basing/making a recommendation using a worn-out piece of equipment as an example, is not exactly good advice. The numbers do not lie for in-spec, brand-new engine stands - 2,000 lb capacity versus 1,000 capacity, and their numbers accurately reflect my experience with both of them. |
Hey Pete - make sure you have the Harbor Freight engine hoist rated at 2 ton. The 1 ton doesn't really extend far enough. Good Luck!
|
Originally Posted by jej3
(Post 15742639)
Hey Pete - make sure you have the Harbor Freight engine hoist rated at 2 ton. The 1 ton doesn't really extend far enough. Good Luck!
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a44d1cd712.jpg Probably elementary questions, but how and where do I connect the lift chains to the motor once I'm ready to pull it and also how and with what bolts and where should it be attached to the standoffs on the engine stand. Also, is there a good link to a complete write-up on waterpump replacement and cam timing setup? Though I'm not changing the waterpump, I'll need to do the rest of it for reassembly.on the 4.7L motor. With JP's soccer games both days, I didn't get much done over the weekend, but hoping to make some progress during a couple evenings this week. Thanks. |
There should be lifting eyelets near cylinders 1 and 8 but being at opposing corners it is awkward even with a load leveler. I will try this method next time: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ft-points.html
I used this excellent water pump/timing belt guide: http://static.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Con...ber%202011.pdf |
1 Attachment(s)
Use this one and you will have no issues.
|
Originally Posted by Majestic Moose
(Post 15742981)
There should be lifting eyelets near cylinders 1 and 8 but being at opposing corners it is awkward even with a load leveler. I will try this method next time: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ft-points.html
I used this excellent water pump/timing belt guide: http://static.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Con...ber%202011.pdf Interesting idea from Kevin on the lifting points too - might need to get some steel angle iron and a couple large eye bolts at Lowe's today. |
Originally Posted by Majestic Moose
(Post 15742981)
There should be lifting eyelets near cylinders 1 and 8 but being at opposing corners it is awkward even with a load leveler. I will try this method next time: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ft-points.html
they worked great with the load leveler. Pete, you want to borrow them? |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15743107)
Thanks for the props. :-)
they worked great with the load leveler. Pete, you want to borrow them? Let me know and I'll shoot you some $ for postage - don't think I'm headed towards Atlanta in the next couple weeks. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15743160)
Sure if you can spare them for a while - if not, I'll just make a set since I'll need them twice (removal & reinstallation) and am probably going to be dressing up the 4.7 a bit once it arrives before installation (cam towers, pulleys, etc). I don't want to mess up anything you have going from a timing perspective as it seems like you're pulling or reinstalling a motor every couple weeks LOL
Let me know and I'll shoot you some $ for postage - don't think I'm headed towards Atlanta in the next couple weeks. |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15743170)
Boxed and ready to go. PM your address. They go out today.
|
Excellent choice on both the hoist and leveler - lots of lifting-hp and stability, with plenty to spare.
|
Progress continues
Supercharger removed, Power steering fluid drained, Radiator drained & removed https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ee114b3072.jpg |
That's the way. Just keep chipping away. Blower pulley will have to come off, of course. Motor has to come pretty far forward.
|
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15749281)
That's the way. Just keep chipping away. Blower pulley will have to come off, of course. Motor has to come pretty far forward.
Plenty to do between now and then though - clutch pack, power steering lines, header to Y-Pipe bolts, etc etc etc Tracked the motor shipment from BC today - already in GA so won't be long before I can start working on that. |
Did you get the separate box Pete? Hopefully the engine gets there in one piece. I was thinking about the starter bracket. If you are doing a lower clutch cover starter mount for an early car you will remove the flywheel and remove that starter bracket. I also included exhaust gaskets, timing back cover o-rings, and the belt we talked about in the box. It will be some work but you can do this.
The Cams you have available to you may be better than the 4.7L USA cams on the motor I sent. |
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15749434)
Did you get the separate box Pete? Hopefully the engine gets there in one piece. I was thinking about the starter bracket. If you are doing a lower clutch cover starter mount for an early car you will remove the flywheel and remove that starter bracket. I also included exhaust gaskets, timing back cover o-rings, and the belt we talked about in the box. It will be some work but you can do this.
The Cams you have available to you may be better than the 4.7L USA cams on the motor I sent. I've got an combo setup so won't know what works for the flywheel and starter stuff until I get into it. Z06 trans, 83 dual plate clutch, high-torque starter, etc. Thanks for l the extra parts too. You all have been extremely helpful. I decided not to do any of the Euro stuff in the interest of time and cost - maybe the next time :) |
Phase 2 tonight
Coolant drained from both sides of engine block - that was fun. Starter and alternator removed (supercharger earlier today) https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3ac0bc612.jpg Oil drained https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dcc9ad6fa9.jpg More wiring disconnected Headers unbolted from Y-Pipe https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...802620dbf3.jpg Everything is so nasty under here with oil and crud, this may have been a blessing in disguise to finally get the engine (or an engine) sealed up properly and toss the drip tray. Probably the oil pump, cam covers, oil pan, and who knows what else. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0b0cdb235e.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8091cef320.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...bef2ff6573.jpg |
I like the turnbuckle on your AC compressor. Excellent simple strong adjustment.
|
Quick update - engine delivery delayed until next week, which is fine. The transport company didn't have a lift-gate truck available today, and it's pouring, so trying to transfer it from a tractor trailer into the back of a pick-up, then use a shop hoist to get it into the garage would have been fun.
Still waiting on some hardware from Fastenal to be able to put the new motor on the Engine stand, and not having to work around it while I continue to work on getting the current motor out will be better. Also, my box from Roger is shipping today so delivery Thursday of next week when I'm back from a trip should work out perfectly. |
Wow, that sucks. It says "Lift gate service" at delivery. These things are random sometimes. At least its close. Did you get the box though?
|
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15753580)
Wow, that sucks. It says "Lift gate service" at delivery. These things are random sometimes. At least its close. Did you get the box though?
Also gives me a chance to have the engine to stand mounting hardware on-hand that arrives at Fastenal on Monday. No box yet - tracking shows it in Greensboro, NC with an exception for a train derailment that is delaying delivery - you can't make this stuff up :) As long as it shows up by Wednesday of next week, should be totally fine. |
Jeebuz.
|
Made some more progress today, but not as much as I would have liked, because I started cleaning things up a little as I was removing them - wiping down wiring of oil and grease, etc.
Removed A/C Compressor and tied it off to the side. Removed Y-Pipe and Exhaust Heat Shield Removed Clutch bottom housing cover and noticed that the clutch assembly (looks like maybe the flywheel teeth from the 1st picture below) had been coming in contact with it to some degree - this may have happened a while ago when the first intermediate plate cracked, but the grooves in the cover aren't covered with the same black friction disc dust, so seems more recent, but I would guess that would make a god-awful noise that I don't recall hearing. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6858df158d.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e5d1265985.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4af8a8bcdd.jpg so I machined it down below the level of the grooves that existed so it won't contact there in the future. I couldn't figure out how it could be adjusted since the throwout bearing plate is held in a specific position by the two small bolts. Also, should this T fastener be in the groove that it looks like it should be in? https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b65456bd56.jpg I loosened both pinch bolts from the torque tube coupler, slid it back, and removed the 2 small fasteners from the throwout bearing plate. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dfff8494b5.jpg I looked in the WSM and did an online search, but can't find definitive instructions on how the clutch pack is now removed at this point. I've read something about shims that need to be installed before taking the circumferential bolts loose Also, do I need to not go any further with this part until I can put the flywheel lock on in order to break the crankshaft nut loose? I also have a hardware kit from Carl that has 3 U-shaped clips, 3 red head painted bolts, and 6 hardened bolts that is supposed to come in handy for this job as I'm changing my friction discs from the current SPEC ones back to OEM versions in order to smooth out the clutch engagement and make the car much more drivable in traffic and on hill starts. Currently the clutch is very grabby and you can't spin it against the flywheel at all without it creating driveline shudder - you either have to let it out very slowly with no throttle until it just starts to engage and then let it the rest of the way out very quickly, or you have to rev it up and dump it, but there's no middle ground, which I don't like, so fixing that as part of this project. Other progress pics from today... A/C Compressor removed and tied-off https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...49b49f7790.jpg Starter Wires Cleaned up https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c39c192587.jpg Y-Pipe and Heat Shield Removed https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...50e8ad2ef7.jpg Also, my adapter flange from Dave Lomas at Motorsports SLC arrived today and the holes between the two flanges are clocked by about 1/3 hole. Is this what's needed for everything to properly line-up on the passenger side when installing the '85/'86 round tube SS headers onto a 16v engine or should the bolt holes be aligned? I'm going to clean-up the welds a little bit too before installing. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fd702164a8.jpg Planning to tackle the mess that is the power steering pump tomorrow. I have a spare that came with the car I'll be installing when it goes back together. Going to fire up the ultrasonic parts washer tomorrow if I have time to start degreasing some of these nasty brackets (power steering pump bracket, clutch housing cover, A/C bracket, exhaust heat shield. etc.) |
Clutch removal is simple. The shims are the "U shaped clips". They go under the rivets to hold them out a bit when you unbolt the pressure plate pack (PP Pack). The 'T shaped fastener' is supposed to be a round head rivet. And yes, it's supposed to be up a bit.
6 bolts hold the PP pack to the fly wheel. You have to rotate the motor to get to them, so don't lock it into place just yet.. Carl may have sent you new bolts, some folks don't like to reuse them. Not sure. Once the bolts are out, just pull the short shaft back, out of the pilot bearing in the back of the crank. The PP pack will fall freely down. Don't drop it on your head. The short shaft should pull out easily. If not, there's a problem. I had to deal with it and can walk you through it. |
that is a funny looking adapter,
the holes look like they wont line up but, they make these flanges on a special jig so they do line up perfectly, weld cleanup is another story |
Thanks Stan and Joe.
Next question. How the heck do you get the pulley off the power steering pump once the lock nut is removed. Are the threads backwards or should counter clockwise rotation remove it. I have a spare PS pump I'm going to install but it has a bent pulley so I need to swap the pulley from my messy one over to it. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...51c3ff0063.jpg |
Hi Pete,
From your picture, there is a keyway on the pulley. I bet that using a puller will extract the pulley. BTW it looks like right-hand threads on the end of the shaft. I wish you the best of luck with your project. Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15757833)
Hi Pete,
From your picture, there is a keyway on the pulley. I bet that using a puller will extract the pulley. BTW it looks like right-hand threads on the end of the shaft. I wish you the best of luck with your project. Dave |
Power steering pump is off and I cleaned up a lot of the parts I removed - heat shields, brackets, etc and the spare set of timing pulleys I have.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...03db990808.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1131f0191c.jpg |
Was able to get more accomplished last night.
Pretty much finished removal of anything connected to the motor that needs to come off working from above the engine. Power Stteering reservoir is out. Coil is out K-Jet system is removed https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...be05933500.jpg Engine without K-Jet setup, PS Reservoir, & Coil https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7df00b726f.jpg K-Jet Fueling Removed https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...35ece5e362.jpg Nasty valley between the banks https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4c0ea9d936.jpg color coded these plugs with wire ties and took a photo so I'd be able to put them back correctly since the plugs and the wiring all look the same |
Today, the new motor arrived and looks to be in good shape, though I haven't spun it upside down yet. BC did a very nice sealing and packaging job to keep the open ports sealed off.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f5da4f6a20.jpg I was able to lift the engine on the skid out of the bed of the pickup with the HF 2-Ton Hoist and pneumatic ram quite easily https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c65780273b.jpg Used Kevin's mounting bracket setup for the water-pump - worked great. (THANKS Kevin !) https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...78dd528372.jpg On the backside, I do not have the large studs or bolt holes for his other bracket, just some M6 ones that hold the K-Jet setup in place, and didn't think they would be strong enough, so just used his eye-bolt through this hole instead (OK to do it this way, or not for the next lift?) https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ae690994f3.jpg Then used the leveler to get the engine horizontal to connect it up to the Sunex Engine Stand - worked like a charm. I had to pick it up with with very uneven chain lengths the way it was sitting on the pallet and why I had to run the leveler all the way over to the side to level it out, but it all worked. I'll pick it up from the stand evenly and use the leveler to angle it for installation into the car for the next part. I followed some advice I found on here about mounting it on the stand lower than aligning the crank with the rotational access of the stand, which should keep the center of gravity lower when it rolls over the top. Going to try and finish the work under the car with the old motor tonight, then leave it there until this one is ready to go in so I don't lose more garage space. I plan to do some work on this new motor before installation, like installing a new oil pan gasket and stud kit, powdercoating the cam tower covers and some other parts, etc. |
OK, I am super glad it is there in one piece. I had some dreams about the straps coming off....
I would strongly recommend redoing the pan gasket, as they always need to be redone. With the sitting, I would just assume. Free flywheel! lol. Take that off, so you can get to the starter bracket, and get that off, I would also say. I put several squirts of fresh oil in the spark plug holes, so when you turn it upside down, it will leak out. |
To remove these cam covers or valve covers for cleanup and powdercoat, do I just remove the 6 top caps so I can access the bolts under them and also the 9 lower socket cap bolts and then lift off (or tap off) the covers?
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...64ba2c30b0.jpg What surprises await me under there and if it's going to be a couple weeks before they go back on, do I just cover what's underneath them with plastic bags? |
When you remove the bolts for the cam towers be aware that the cam followers can slide out of their bores and fall on the ground
|
Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
(Post 15768009)
When you remove the bolts for the cam towers be aware that the cam followers can slide out of their bores and fall on the ground
So how do you prevent that from happening, or is in not really preventable, and what's the best thing to do after? Do you put them back in and then use some blue tape across the tops to hold them in place, should you just remove them, and put them into individual baggies labelled for each cylinder, or something else. I see some evidence of wetness on these valve covers on the new motor and have new gaskets from Roger already on hand. With this motor, I want to resolve all the oil leaks before it goes in so I don't have to deal with the mess I have with the current motor whenever I need to work on it. |
Tonight I:
Locked the flywheel and broke the crankshaft bolt loose. Now I'll be able to remove the clutch and bell housing to separate that from the motor (probably tomorrow) Finished removing the power steering hoses as new versions of them are going in when the car goes back together Removed the plastic timing belt covers - all but one is cracked, so probably going to replace them as well. Belt and pulleys are pretty nasty from the oil leaks https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5498511019.jpg 4.7 Liter on the Sunex stand with drip tray underneath. More parts to wash tomorrow. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8640fba345.jpg Flywheel Lock Tool in use... https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...16df68a4f0.jpg ...to break the crankshaft bolt loose https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1eb9b13916.jpg Timing Belt covers removed - pretty messy in there |
Looking good Pete!
|
Couple things -
I think I have plastic covers somewhere. If you want them, and then if I can find them, they are yours for shipping. The cam towers always leak. There is oil on them on this engine, however, because they were covered when I turned the engine over after I put oil in the spark plug holes. Mistake. So they were dry before that. That said, its good insurance. Plus, as I mentioned, I think you should use your 78/79 cams. |
If you do pull the cam towers Mr Brown makes improved cam tower gaskets. They would be worth it if they were expensive but they are stupid cheap.
|
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15769391)
Couple things -
I think I have plastic covers somewhere. If you want them, and then if I can find them, they are yours for shipping. The cam towers always leak. There is oil on them on this engine, however, because they were covered when I turned the engine over after I put oil in the spark plug holes. Mistake. So they were dry before that. That said, its good insurance. Plus, as I mentioned, I think you should use your 78/79 cams. Yes, if you have unbroken plastic cam timing covers, I'll take them. The only good one I have is outer top left. I need and all the other ones, including inner left and right. Can you email me pictures of the ones you have? Why do you say to reuse my cams? My plan was to pull the cam towers but not to remove the heads. Do you think there's an issue with the cams? |
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15769411)
If you do pull the cam towers Mr Brown makes improved cam tower gaskets. They would be worth it if they were expensive but they are stupid cheap.
Are these the good ones? https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...18a0a05013.jpg |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15769492)
Brendan,
Yes, if you have unbroken plastic cam timing covers, I'll take them. The only good one I have is outer top left. I need and all the other ones, including inner left and right. Can you email me pictures of the ones you have? Why do you say to reuse my cams? My plan was to pull the cam towers but not to remove the heads. Do you think there's an issue with the cams? |
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15769529)
You don't remove the heads. You don't have to change anything except if you wanted to the cams have higher lift or more duration on the 78/79 cams. And they just are in the cam boxes.
|
Pulled the Clutch Pack today and washed more parts. Once I get the car back together and drive it with the OEM friction discs, I'll probably put this pair of SPEC friction discs up for sale so someone who needs more aggressive clutch grip can get a deal on them.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...db9e26e0ab.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1815a7e8f6.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6984fd2099.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a86775147b.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2c84a9c687.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff20af88c6.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4682e72e40.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...682cc5383b.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9bb0f455a8.jpg |
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15769529)
You don't remove the heads. You don't have to change anything except if you wanted to the cams have higher lift or more duration on the 78/79 cams. And they just are in the cam boxes.
https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...cam-specs.html I'm guessing this setup is going to make a significant difference. I'll be moving the compression ratio from 8.5:1 to 9.3:1, increasing the displacement slightly from 4.5L to 4.7L and then if I use my '79 cams, combining those changes with increased lift and duration, this might turn out to be a decent HP & torque bump, especially with the supercharger, which I also recently upgraded. I'm getting kind of excited about this whole thing now, though I'm most excited about not having oil and power steering fluid all over my motor and the garage floor. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15769499)
Bought a pair from Roger and am assuming that's what he sent since I'm also doing all GB's fuel and clutch line.
Are these the good ones? https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...18a0a05013.jpg Those will never leak, if you read and follow the instructions provided with them. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15771694)
Yes.
Those will never leak, if you read and follow the instructions provided with them. No instructions included. You have a PDF you can attach here or email to me at petza914@gmail.com. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15771699)
Looking forward to that.
No instructions included. You have a PDF you can attach here or email to me at petza914@gmail.com. Thanks. I have instructions for every single thing I sell. |
I have instructions that have me dropping the steering rack to access the motor mount bolts, but those bolts look like they're just securing this bracket that is then secured to the motor by 4 bolts - 2 on each side.
Can I just undo these 4 bolts to free the motor and not mess with the sway bar or steering rack? https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5d48614954.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5dfed36bc1.jpg |
To pull the engine, yes. That's how I removed and installed my S4 engine. Not sure on the 16 valve engines, but on the 32 valve after you remove the bell housing to engine bolts, you loosen the 2 transaxle mount bolts and slide it back about 1/2" or so and it gives you more room to get the engine loose from the bell housing and remove the engine.
|
I don't recall exactly, but I think it may be difficult the get the engine high enough to clear the mounts if you leave them on the cross brace.
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15774913)
I have instructions that have me dropping the steering rack to access the motor mount bolts, but those bolts look like they're just securing this bracket that is then secured to the motor by 4 bolts - 2 on each side.
Can I just undo these 4 bolts to free the motor and not mess with the sway bar or steering rack? |
Hmmm. Looking again now those are not the stock early car motor mounts and that looks like the modified cross brace with removable center section. So, not sure what your best procedure will be. I will say, though, that I do not feel like the early mounts hold up, so you are in a good position in that respect.
|
I thought the point of the removable center was to pull the engine without disconnecting the motor mounts, right?
|
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15778051)
I thought the point of the removable center was to pull the engine without disconnecting the motor mounts, right?
|
I researched this and the benefit is access to oil pan , oil pan gasket and rod bearings.
|
I recognize that 3-piece cross-member as one of ours. We do not make that product anymore. After you have lowered the steering rack, you can remove the 4 allen-head bolts and drop out the center section, making oil pan removal very simple without messing with your suspension or changing the front end alignment. It was great for racers who like to slip in a new set of rod bearings from the bottom after each season or two :)
Won't help you any during an engine removal. Leave it assembled as-is and follow regular instructions for engine R&R. Remember, your motor mounts are late-model style, not the 78/79 style. That conversion took place when the 3-piece cross member went in. |
Right, those are the solid rubber motor mounts.
It still looks like there are 4 large bolts that will allow the motor to come out without messing with the steering stuff at all or the motor mounts either. The mounts seem to be attached to some brackets and then those brackets are attached to the motor by the 4 bolts. Maybe not, and I'll look again tomorrow. |
Pulled the Cam Towers from the New Motor today to get them cleaned up (90 degree razor blade method then the parts washer) and have everything put together to go off to powdercoat. Even managed to get both sides off without dropping any of the cam followers / lifters. The motor looks to be in very nice shape below the cam towers - surfaces look good without pitting. I'll take a look inside the cylinders with a boroscope before I put things together.
Here's today's photo set https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f763028bcb.jpg Cam Tower From End with Cap https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...de57989616.jpg Both Cam Towers - Followers removed and stored safely - before the surfaces were cleaned up https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5b01045745.jpg Cams out - planning to use the ones from my old motor instead for better lift & duration https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b3073643e0.jpg Engine with cam towers removed - you can see the flecks of old gasket material that was scraped off in the catch tray https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6a4c12785c.jpg Close-up of Engine on stand (other side) with cam tower removed https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4f1e9546eb.jpg Once I finished all of that - reconfigured the garage for summer - boat is out and lift moved to the other bay for later trailer storage. Now I don't have to move the 914 out in order to be able to lower the 928 for ground work. Now that the engine is open with the cam towers removed, I bagged it to keep pollen and other contaminants out of it until the parts come back from powdercoat and I can put it back together and seal it up again. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2341cd3804.png Here's the Blackstone UOA Report after the blown head gasket and overheating event. Other than the presence of coolant, this is one of the best reports on this motor, so it doesn't look like any damage was done to the internals as there weren't any wear metals in the oil. Hoping when I pull the cams that the lobes looks good without any hot-spots and that I can put those into the new motor when the towers come back from powdercoat. Should be 1.5-2 weeks before I have the parts back so I'll do some of the work to the engine that needs to be done - replace the oil pan gasket and install the stud kit, reseal the oil pump, and then I'll work on pulling the old motor and cleaning up the engine bay now that I have some additional floor space in the shop where I can set the old motor on the skid the new motor arrived on. |
Pete, you are a real stud! Keep up the great work!! Now you'll have a spare engine?
Thanks for sharing, Dave |
Dave,
Thanks a lot. Yes, when all is said and done I'll have a spare 4.5L long block with cams from a 4.7L - no fueling and some other missing parts, but essentially a spare engine if I decide to keep it. Today I mostly worked on getting the boat ready for the summer since it was a sunny day, but found some time to start polishing my stainless Y-pipe. Also planning to do the 85/86 round tube headers I bought. Not going as quickly as I'd liked, but also not too bad. It's taking a while to get all the burned oil and grease off the front sections - the rear straight pipe went pretty quick. I have a bit more to do on this side and then will flip it over to do the other one. Supposed to rain tomorrow, so I might decide to pull the motor so I can start cleaning up the engine bay. Parts also get dropped off at the powdercoater tomorrow. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e502b6c724.jpg At the start https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...183ebde23d.jpg Passenger Side Partly done https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c805ae6e89.jpg Passenger Side and straight section mostly done |
Very nice. I have the same Y-pipe, not polished.
Thanks again, Dave |
Here's the next question.
I have flywheels on both engines and will need to use the good one from my blown motor on the new motor, but now don't have clutches attached to either engine so no teeth to put a flywheel lock onto. What's the best way to free the flywheel bolts without the motor turning backwards. Actually, in thinking more about this...because we talk about turning the motor clockwise only, and that's from the crankshaft bolt perspective, correct, that means at the opposite end of the engine where the flywheel is located, the counter-clockwise rotational force used to remove a bolt would actually be turning the motor in the proper direction, correct? https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...73e86bf103.jpg If I need to keep it from rotating at all, I figured I could put a proper size spline socket on a breaker bar into one bolt that I'm not trying to remove to be able to hold it against the direction that the impact gun would generate on the bolt I am trying to remove. When I get to the last one, I could thread 2 of the previously removed bolts part of the way back in and use a prybar between them, while I undo the last bolt with the impact gun - would that method work and not do any damage? |
Your rattle gun and counter-hold method is exactly what I was thinking.
Good luck, Dave |
Impact gun and counter-hold method worked great on the new engine that's on the stand. There's not enough space for the impact gun in the bell housing to do that one while it's in the car so I'll remove it once the engine is out and sitting on a pallet.
Then I went to remove the starter mounting bracket from the new motor. The 13mm bolts came out easily enough - the other 2 not so much. Finally got one of them using a propane torch to heat it up and then a manual impact hammer to knock it loose and finally the air gun to spin it out, but the other one wasn't having any of that. Eventually broke off the tip of a hardened screw extractor in the center of the bolt which put an end to that method - I honestly don't know why I try those things - they hardly ever work, and usually just snap off. After cutting a flat slot into the bolt head and trying the manual impact hammer method to no avail (it did bend the the head of the straight impact bit though), I decided to cut the bracket away from the bolt since I don't need it anyway - my hi-torque starter mounts to the lower bell housing. Very carefully using a dremel and an air grinder, I cut the bracket in half at the bolt head and once it was gone used some vice grips to unscrew the bolt. That was fun. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...16e552f607.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...29b4bb920f.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6a8b9c4734.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f2e2691d8a.jpg |
|
Crafty Alex
|
Motor is OUT
Big Day Today. The 4.5L is out!
Now I'm starting to clean up and swap parts from one to the other and to clean up the engine bay. Took about 2 hours to clean all the greasy dirt off the engine cross-member. My removal method did work though. Left the motor mounts in place and took the 4 main bolts from the motor brackets out that attach to the motor mounts. Not sure this is much easier than dropping the rack to remove the lower motor mounts though, because you have to lift the motor higher to clear them, I think, and I ended up dropping the rack anyway to clean everything and am going to repaint the support plate under the rack too. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9dc154f5b0.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...034c0fa56f.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...01b66d77a0.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a1ba62a3ca.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c91465e6a7.jpg |
Hi Pete,
You are amazing. The work you do is great! Thanks for sharing, Dave |
Next question for the collective knowledge base.
When pulling the motor today I noticed the cam tower covers, plugs, and the end caps are different between the two motors. Here's the end cap on the cam towers from my current 4.5L engine. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b30c345268.jpg and here's the end cap from the 4.7L engine https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ad558d605a.jpg Since I'm planning to reuse my 4.5L cams in my 4.7L engine because of the higher lift and longer duration, here are the questions:
Thanks. |
Hi Pete,
I'm sure there are a few things to do with the engine out, but there is an a/c line that runs along the passenger fender side of the engine compartment. I think it goes from expansion valve to condenser? It's very difficult to change this line with the engine in place. Something to consider., Dave Great work |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15789954)
Hi Pete,
I'm sure there are a few things to do with the engine out, but there is an a/c line that runs along the passenger fender side of the engine compartment. I think it goes from expansion valve to condenser? It's very difficult to change this line with the engine in place. Something to consider., Dave Great work https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9911c71147.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6ec62f1c7c.jpg |
Pete - opt for the cam tower from the 4.7L motor. The rubber plugs from the early motor are hard to find and pricey, and they often leak. The other cam towers will have nice threaded plugs and crush rings. Much better. Consider it an upgrade.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15790569)
Pete - opt for the cam tower from the 4.7L motor. The rubber plugs from the early motor are hard to find and pricey, and they often leak. The other cam towers will have nice threaded plugs and crush rings. Much better. Consider it an upgrade.
Thanks for following along and chiming in. I came to that same conclusion last night. Having already taken the cam towers and end caps from the 4.7L to the powdercoater, I got concerned about whether I could just put the 4.5L cams into those cam towers, so last night, pulled the cam towers and cams from the 4.5L motor. When I layed them side by side, everthing lined up so I determined there wasn't anything special about the cam tower design of the 4.5L that would make those cams only work in those towers. Upon inspecting the cam lobes themselves, the 4.5L cams actually look to be in better shape too - less dark discoloration on the lobes. The question I have now is should I use the followers/lifters that were in the 4.7L motor with the 4.5L cams or use the lifters from the 4.5L cam with the 4.5L cam in the 4.7L towers? The lifters out of the 4.7L look like they might be slightly better/newer as the underside is still a nice dark bronze color whereas the ones from the 4.5L have faded. Tops and sides all look to be about the same - no pitting, uniform scuff marks from use, etc. Here's last night's photo set so you can see what the 4.5L towers and heads looked like, the lifter sets side by side, etc. Pulled the lightweight SPEC flywheel from the 4.5L motor to remount onto the 4.7. Remember when I pulled the lower bell housing for the clutch and found what looked liked interference damage - think I discovered the cause of that - look at the outer ring of bolts on the backside of the flywheel - threaded part has been ground even with the nuts and the edges / faces of a few of the nuts have also been "shaved". When I removed the bell housing, I created some clearance in the area where that damage was - would you guys reinstall the lightweight flywheel or should I clean up the one that came on the 4.7L motor and use that one instead? Reminder of what the lower clutch housing damage looked like https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6e3e2e997b.jpg Note the outer circumference of bolts that are ground smooth. Looks to me like there was interference between them and someone ground down the bolt heads and machined some clearance into the housing cover. Had this happened naturally, the damage to the bell housing would have been in a constant arc where the bolt heads spun through it, not in a vertical pattern as shown. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...168b3db9db.jpg There is also some deformity to the metal on the flywheel contact ring on the inner circumference, which I can clean up with a grinding wheel. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5be80862f7.jpg Here's the heavier flywheel that came on the 4.7L motor https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...76fb6f04f2.jpg ,,,so would you guys clean up and use the OEM flywheel from the 4.7L motor or will I not like the way the car feels now that I've been driving it with the lightweight flywheel and gotten used to the freer-revving nature? Will it feel lethargic with the heavier flywheel? Next, I pulled the cam towers from the 4.5L motor to compare it's cams to those from the 4.7L motor since the difference in end-cap had me concerned that I might need to reuse the 4.5L cam towers with it's cams and that they wouldn't just slide in and work right in the 4.7L towers. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2c22bc2632.jpg 4.5L cam tower end cap (thicker and domed for some reason) https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f68b954bd3.jpg 4.7L cam tower end cap (thinner and flatter) https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cb6c27a954.jpg First I set the motor at TDC https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7da1c2e737.jpg 1-4 TDC mark aligned (or pretty close to it) https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1961d263e6.jpg 5-8 TDC mark aligned https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...425ce8925a.jpg Front view of 4.5L before things start coming apart. Tensioner had lateral play in it - normal or not? Doesn't matter as I'm replacing that one with one of Ken's on reassembly. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...506835a734.jpg 1-4 Cam Tower. Interesting design compared to the 4.7L one. In the 4.5L, the lifters ride in these guide pairs that have flat sides where they meet each other. In the 4.7L, the lifters just ride in machined bores in the tower. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9401955e15.jpg Is the Dark Brown sludge normal? The 4.7L didn't look like this when I took it apart. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...134e08cf4f.jpg 1-4 cam side of Head https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d10675e33c.jpg 1-4 4.5L cam on towel / 4.7L cam on bubble wrap. The 4.5L cam actually looks to be in better shape to me - what do you guys think? https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...316b23987c.jpg 4.5L on towel / 4.7L on bubble wrap https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...beb05881f0.jpg 4.5L on towel / 4.7L on bubble wrap. 4.7 looks like is has some lobe wear or hot spots. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c06d4094ac.jpg 4.5L on towel / 4.7L on bubble wrap. 4.7 looks like is has some lobe wear or hot spots. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d76f7334be.jpg 1-4 4.5L lifters out, organized, and stored https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...78f4a89abd.jpg 5-8 4.5L Cam Tower https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7eb544cc5b.jpg 5-8 4.5L Camshaft https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d8e1f71a9e.jpg 4.7L Lifters on the Left / 4.5L on the right. Which should I reuse during reassembly. The bronze color on the 4.7s looks fresher, but if the lifter should stay with the cam lobe it was paired with before the other shiny sides are comparable between the 2 sets. Any opinions, input, or guidance is welcomed. Thanks. |
About your flywheel: That a light-weight aluminum flywheel, and it allows the engine to rev faster because it stores less kinetic energy than a heavier flywheel.
The moment of polar inertia is lower – so the torque the engine makes is immediately available to the tires, rather than having to overcome the mass of the flywheel first before it can turn the tires. That said: it’s a double-edged sword. Because it stores less energy; it also is a little harder come away from stop signs without chugging, requiring more throttle in order to replace the weight it doesn't have. You may be happier with the stock flywheel from the 4.7 motor. You aren't racing, and you know know what clutch chatter is. I noted you are also replacing the SPEC friction material with stock friction disks, that will also make for smoother launches. |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15791094)
About your flywheel: That a light-weight aluminum flywheel, and it allows the engine to rev faster because it stores less kinetic energy than a heavier flywheel.
The moment of polar inertia is lower – so the torque the engine makes is immediately available to the tires, rather than having to overcome the mass of the flywheel first before it can turn the tires. That said: it’s a double-edged sword. Because it stores less energy; it also is a little harder come away from stop signs without chugging, requiring more throttle in order to replace the weight it doesn't have. You may be happier with the stock flywheel from the 4.7 motor. You aren't racing, and you know know what clutch chatter is. I noted you are also replacing the SPEC friction material with stock friction disks, that will also make for smoother launches. Now that I know how all this stuff comes apart and goes together, and aren't really afraid of it anymore (the abyss of the unknown), I'm planning to reinstall the lightweight flywheel with the OEM friction discs that have the internal marsailles springs. If this combination isn't smooth enough, I'll just drop the lower housing, pull the clutch again and install the other flywheel to see how that goes, but compared to my 997, the 928 doesn't feel like a light, free-revving motor, so don't think I want to make it less so than the way it drives currently. Thanks for the insight. |
I'm with you. Once you get used to driving an aluminum flywheel, I can't go back, either. I enjoy the throttle response too much. :)
|
Ordered more parts from Carl, Roger, and Mark and now think I'll have everything I need to put the new engine together and into the car. It was mostly gaskets, seals, covers, etc.
While waiting on those parts to arrive and for the powdercoated items to be ready, I cleaned up more oily parts to get them ready for paint and/or install. Also installed the lightweight flywheel onto the 4.7L motor, but haven't torqued it down yet. Next is probably the oil pump seals, pan gasket, and cleaning up the engine bay. Also pressure tested my radiator and it has a tube leak, so that's being sent off tomorrow to be recored. Remember how the inside of the upper bell housing was caked with black crud - not anymore. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...23840112d3.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8151d40147.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4644a3c0b8.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8762bb2932.jpg |
Looking great Pete!! You are really coming along fast. I think you'll be back on the road before me. LOL.
Speaking of installing the flywheel, I've been trying to figure out if the bolts go in dry, with anti-seize, or with Loctite. The WSM mentions the torque procedure in several places, but doesn't say to put anything on the threads. I assume this means dry, or they would have said different. However virtually every flywheel I've ever installed or seen installed had something on the threads depending on application. |
Originally Posted by Chris Lockhart
(Post 15795075)
Looking great Pete!! You are really coming along fast. I think you'll be back on the road before me. LOL.
Speaking of installing the flywheel, I've been trying to figure out if the bolts go in dry, with anti-seize, or with Loctite. The WSM mentions the torque procedure in several places, but doesn't say to put anything on the threads. I assume this means dry, or they would have said different. However virtually every flywheel I've ever installed or seen installed had something on the threads depending on application. The bolts I removed had some copper anti-seize on them and wanting to be able to get them out again at a future date, I cleaned them up and reinstalled with a little Marine grade anti-seize. I'm going to tighten them by having someone hold the crankshaft bolt at the opposite side since that will be in a tightening opposing direction as I torque the flywheel bolts at the opposite end. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15795104)
Thanks Chris.
The bolts I removed had some copper anti-seize on them and wanting to be able to get them out again at a future date, I cleaned them up and reinstalled with a little Marine grade anti-seize. I'm going to tighten them by having someone hold the crankshaft bolt at the opposite side since that will be in a tightening opposing direction as I torque the flywheel bolts at the opposite end. |
You have to be careful with thread lubricants. Most torque specs are dry unless other-wise mentioned. If you add anti-seize or some lubricant, it is very easy to over-torque the fastener because the lubricity allows over-rotation during assembly.
Check some typical torque charts, the good ones call out the different torque values depending on which lube you use. Here is just a simple version I found. Note how, if lube is used, you need to tighten to a much lower torque. Other charts are more precise as to which type of lube is used, but that's more than the average weekend mechanic needs to worry about. Problems of over-torque can include: over-clamping and deforming the parts being clamped; damage (strecthing) of the fastener; and failure of the threads in the fastener or the host material https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17d05a3c3b.png |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15795446)
You have to be careful with thread lubricants. Most torque specs are dry unless other-wise mentioned. If you add anti-seize or some lubricant, it is very easy to over-torque the fastener because the lubricity allows over-rotation during assembly.
Check some typical torque charts, the good ones call out the different torque values depending on which lube you use. Here is just a simple version I found. Note how, if lube is used, you need to tighten to a much lower torque. Other charts are more precise as to which type of lube is used, but that's more than the average weekend mechanic needs to worry about. Problems of over-torque can include: over-clamping and deforming the parts being clamped; damage (strecthing) of the fastener; and failure of the threads in the fastener or the host material https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17d05a3c3b.png Thanks Carl, I was aware of that, but others may not have been. For example, on my 997s, the revised torque spec for the M14 lug bolts is 118 ft. lbs. I use anti-seize on those as well and only tighten to 90-95 ft lbs instead. Doing some further research on this, without going into the different types of anti-seize lubricants that can be used, if using anti-seize on normally dry torque spec fasteners, it looks like a torque reduction of 25% should be about right as a general rule. |
Thanks Carl. Good to know.
|
I flipped the 4.7L motor on the stand with the intention of doing the oil pan gasket tonight, but the pan has visible damage, either from shipping or from bottoming out when in use.
Do you guys think this pan is OK to use or should I source a replacement. I can clean up the grooves to make it look better and I don't believe it's going to leak as there was a little residual oil in the motor that doesn't look like it has leaked out. Let me know what you think. I'm a little concerned about the right front corner (as shown here upside down, so the passenger front corner). https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a0f6bfbba7.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...98b7d59e5f.jpg |
Hi Pete,
If you don't see any fractures on the fins and obviously the sealing surface, I would think you are OK. I also know the work you do, and I bet you can clean up those fins so they will look very good. Maybe someone else has had experience with a similar oil pan? Good luck, Dave |
I would try to make sure it's okay and then reuse it. Replacing an oil pan isn't really a major project if it ends up leaking. Of course I've never replaced one on the 928 so maybe it is..
|
Originally Posted by NelaK
(Post 15797633)
I would try to make sure it's okay and then reuse it. Replacing an oil pan isn't really a major project if it ends up leaking. Of course I've never replaced one on the 928 so maybe it is..
I'll probably proceed with this one. Yesterday I pained some of the parts I had cleaned up the day before -harmonic dampener, oil return tube, coolant crossover pipe, motor brackets, steering rack plate, and the backside of the OEM flywheel which I'm keeping as a spare. I mounted and torqued down the lightweight flywheel to the new motor yesterday. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fb5fb2be57.jpg I can't do much more besides cleaning until I get a couple of the shipments I'm waiting on and the cam towers back from the powdercoater. I could finish polishing the headers and Y-pipe. |
Maximizing use of my time on this tight project time-line...
After running my laps, I DEI Fire-sleeved the new high pressure power steering hose while at my son's soccer practice this evening :) https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e7a0dec128.jpg |
I installed the repainted motor brackets onto the mounts, then installed some new 4-ply silicone coolant hoses that came with the set I bought when I replaced the original hose that blew and caused the loss of coolant and overheating event that started this adventure.
I'll figure out the best orientation and length for the short hose that connects to the motor once it's back in place. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1bda234f10.jpg |
That looks clean and nice, Pete. Great job as usual.
Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15797181)
Hi Pete,
If you don't see any fractures on the fins and obviously the sealing surface, I would think you are OK. I also know the work you do, and I bet you can clean up those fins so they will look very good. Maybe someone else has had experience with a similar oil pan? Good luck, Dave My pan has a significant 'impact mark' on the bottom, When I did the pan gasket & MMs, we found a small area inside that was cracked. It was still attached on one side, but it had lifted a bit. It doesn't go through and has held just fine for several years. |
Thanks guys. I didn't want to open up the bottom of the engine and then find out it was cracked and have to leave it that way for a week, so I sourced a nice used one that will be here next week.
I'm still looking for some input on which set of cam followers I should use from post 172 below if anyone has any. |
I figured you'd be doing the oil pan gasket anyway, so you would be inspecting the inside. Now you have a spare.
Good luck, Dave |
Since you have not gotten an answer I will submit my unqualified opinion. I believe the camshaft and lifters wear into each other and should be kept together. Wear is probably not the correct word but the effect is that each lobe and lifter "break-in" together. If you mix the lifter positions or replace them they have to break-in again. I would install the 4.5 cams and lifters into the 4.7 cam tower so long as the lifter dimensions are the same.
|
Originally Posted by Majestic Moose
(Post 15802593)
Since you have not gotten an answer I will submit my unqualified opinion. I believe the camshaft and lifters wear into each other and should be kept together. Wear is probably not the correct word but the effect is that each lobe and lifter "break-in" together. If you mix the lifter positions or replace them they have to break-in again. I would install the 4.5 cams and lifters into the 4.7 cam tower so long as the lifter dimensions are the same.
|
Engine 101. Engine Gospel. Go directly to engine hell, if violated.
Same lifter on original lobe. Never mix. Any engine. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15802879)
Engine 101. Engine Gospel. Go directly to engine hell, if violated.
Same lifter on original lobe. Never mix. Any engine. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15797675)
In a 928 it usually is, but in my case, I have the 928MS 3-piece front cross-member where I can remove the center section without disturbing the side pieces, the suspension, or the motor mounts, so I guess that would be an option. I cleaned up the crushed vanes and once they turn the same worn aluminum color as the rest of the pan will probably be OK. I have to pull the pan to upgrade the gasket anyway so I'll be able to see if there are any cracks in that one corner I'm concerned about. Worst case scenario is I could pull the pan from my 4.5L but it has always leaked around the drain plug so I was hoping not to have to reuse it and that motor is sitting on a skid on the oil pan so not convenient to extract it.
|
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15803389)
If your 4.5 has the original design pick-up with the cloverleaf in the bottom of the pan and the windage screen neat the top, you will want to use those pieces.
Thanks again for your input. I wasn't planning on pulling the pan from the 4.5L motor as it's currently sitting on it and I don't have a good way to do that (no second engine stand), but if the 4.5L has a better pick-up design than the 4.7L I might need to rethink that. By the end of next week the pan I ordered will have arrived, at which time I'll pull the current pan from the 4.7L to see what it looks like inside and figure out what to do from there. Also, the pan I have coming looks like this inside, which seems to have a windage screen and maybe the other things you mentioned. Is this the setup you'd recommend I use or is this different from what should be in my 4.5L motor? https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c258026431.png https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6194d7b7a2.png |
That's what you want. Whoever is sending you the pan, ask them to send the oil pick-up also.
Veritable treasure, right there. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15803580)
That's what you want. Whoever is sending you the pan, ask them to send the oil pick-up also.
Veritable treasure, right there. |
Did a few things with the little time i had over the weekend. The painted plate under the steering rack is now reinstalled, I cleaned the K-Jet intake to get it ready for reinstallation atop the 4.7L motor once it's back in the car, cleaned and made a painting jig so I can paint the cam tower caps without getting paint on the sealing surface or threads, and changed the sealing method on the ring of the air meter for the intake. The plastic ring has never sealed very well with the piece that's part of the supercharger setup, probably because it is crushed in one area and doesn't align perfectly with the other mating piece. Tonight I figured out when cleaning it that not only does the black plastic ring come out, but the metal base ring just lifts off also. I separated the plastic ring and will throw that in my parts box but not reuse it, then used some foam weatherstripping in the mating grove around the metal ring and this should allow it to seal up extremely well once reassembled so I don't suffer any boost loss at this joint like I have in the past.
Cleaning the K-Jet setup - capped off any openings to prevent the introduction of any cleaning solution. Afterwards, propped the air meter and throttle plate just in case there was any solution entry so it could dry out. In the 2nd picture, note the new seal around the air meter housing - this is what the 928MS piece mates with for the forded air entry. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b63a9a470c.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...df977e8f64.jpg Here's what the old plastic, deformed piece looked like. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...724b4309cb.jpg Installed the plate under the PS rack https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...577009b5e6.jpg Here's the little cam tower cap painting tool that exposes the tops and sides, but protects the mating surfaces and threads. I'll lay a strip of wax paper on it then push the plugs through to prevent the paint from sticking to the wood and getting messed up when I remove the plugs. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...74561d5aa2.jpg |
So tonight I was going to pull and reseal the oil pump, but this engine looks so clean and well put together, and the pump shaft turns smoothly that I'm thinking this might be a waste of time and just create the possibility for leaks that wouldn't otherwise occur.
Based on these photos, what would you guys do - pull it or leave it as is? https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17be8ec49e.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cccd1b47b1.jpg |
I did get a chance today to paint the cam tower caps. I was going to use red but the red likely wouldn't exactly match the red powdercoating being used for the cam tower writing, and they're already a grey color (though not all the same color), so I went with black, which will also give it a little old-school flavor of the black rubber press in caps from the original motor.
The jig with the wax paper worked perfectly. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1522621b8a.jpg |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15803580)
That's what you want. Whoever is sending you the pan, ask them to send the oil pick-up also.
Veritable treasure, right there. Regarding this pan and pickup, Is it a standard 4.5 pan? If so, should I pick one of these up (+oil pickup tube) for a future engine project on a 5.0 (if compatible) and while they are still available? I have never seen a factory pan like this: https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c0fc08cefd.png Can't wait to see this car in person at SITM or PCNA Rendwous in Atlanta. Great perseverance and attention to detail Pete! > |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15807854)
So tonight I was going to pull and reseal the oil pump, but this engine looks so clean and well put together, and the pump shaft turns smoothly that I'm thinking this might be a waste of time and just create the possibility for leaks that wouldn't otherwise occur.
Based on these photos, what would you guys do - pull it or leave it as is? Pull it, replace the o-ring and bolt o-rings. Easy decision. |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15808379)
Unless you know it's been done before...
Pull it, replace the o-ring and bolt o-rings. Easy decision. What about the main shaft seal in addition to the o-ring an bolt seals? Thanks for the sage advice. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15808415)
It was done when the engine was rebuilt, which was only 1,500 miles ago, but also about 16 months. I should probably just pull it and do the seals as I already have them on-hand and would be really mad if I put it all back together and then had an oil pump leak.
What about the main shaft seal in addition to the o-ring an bolt seals? Thanks for the sage advice. |
If you have the seals on hand you might as well for fun and peace of mind. Its very easy. After I did mine a few weeks ago I read on here that oiling the outer surface of the seal prior to insertion is highly frowned upon as some folks have had a history of the seals walking out over time if this is done. There is no question that the seals are still good after 16 months, but it would be good to know they are in just the way you want and to have a look at the shafts. My '88 was all original and after 372 months they were not so good.
|
I took care of the oil pump last night. Glad I decided to do it as I discovers my pump gear is the steel version and from what I read on Rennlist (Stan), and in the WSM, the 1mm shim that was installed on my shaft should only be used with the aluminum pump gear. Please confirm that's correct.
I put everything back together with Driven Assembly Grease and will first run this motor with their BR break in oil, for 50-100 miles or so, since it has some new parts and I'm using the cams from the 4.5L motor and want everything to settle in nicely. The Driven Assembly Grease is designed to dissolve in thee Driven BR oil and not clog passageways or remain thick. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0cb5d64099.jpg Removed, disassembled, and cleaned. New parts collection for reinstallation. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...035f19e938.jpg Pump housing on engine cleaned up - looks good inside https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...62e1fa0d86.jpg Pump gear is steel (ferrous) but you can also see the 1mm shim that shouldn't be used with the steel gear https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...75a2de5d45.jpg Oil pump reassembled with new o-ring and generously coated with Driven Assembly Grease. Note dots visibe on both gear faces that need to face the block side of the engine. This means the outer gear is installed in the correct orientation. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3e37ec328.jpg Oil pump installed with new woodruff key, 1mm washer omitted, inner plastic cover installed and both the oil pump pulley and crankshaft pulley are reinstalled. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1c911bf160.jpg I painted the steel pulleys that are going onto this motor with VHT hi-temp ceramic engine enamel, but not the running surfaces of the pulleys to avoid any issues the paint might cause with the belt. I also did a little work to the water inlet pipe on the flywheel side of the motor. Mine was badly corroded. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7112995c69.jpg My 4.5L fitting was pretty badly corroded https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...516f031fc4.jpg The one on the 4.7L motor was much better but has this extra wing that must be used to mount something related to the L-Jet system. With me reusing my K-Jet setup, that portion is in the way of the assembly, so I trimmed it off. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9026c80b6c.jpg Water inlet - adapted https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2c32aec54.jpg Should work just fine now |
The steel versus aluminum pulley is the one you painted red - not the one you have a magnetic probe attached to. It's that actual pulley that is important. If your pulley is aluminum, replace it with the steel version and leave the shim off.
|
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15810972)
The steel versus aluminum pulley is the one you painted red - not the one you have a magnetic probe attached to. It's that actual pulley that is important. If your pulley is aluminum, replace it with the steel version and leave the shim off.
|
The new oil pan and pickup arrived while I was out of town this week. They weren't bad, but got a chance to really clean them up today and should be able to get the installation done over the weekend with the new silicone gasket and pan stud kit.
Turned out to be a really nice pan with only a little impact mark on the bottom near the drain plug. No tears in the windage screen, no cracks in the clover, and the rubber seal on good shape. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...77f43b7356.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...334dff8f41.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f69a0fd2ad.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...bbb32eca20.jpg |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15816844)
The new oil pan and pickup arrived while I was out of town this week. They weren't bad, but got a chance to really clean them up today and should be able to get the installation done over the weekend with the new silicone gasket and pan stud kit.
Turned out to be a really nice pan with only a little impact mark on the bottom near the drain plug. No tears in the windage screen, no cracks in the clover, and the rubber seal on good shape. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...77f43b7356.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...334dff8f41.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f69a0fd2ad.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...bbb32eca20.jpg Gold treasure, instead of just silver treasure, |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15817211)
Complete with the "later" (superceeded) pick-up to clover leaf seal.....
Gold treasure, instead of just silver treasure, |
Nice work here , I put one of those pans in Samanthas engine,
from your photos I would remove the paint from the faces of the cam drive gear , since its a compression assembly you dont want the painting to act as a bearing and slowly wear off, thus creating a space, then the bolt possibly coming loose. The factory never painted any of these gears neither should you. |
Nevermind....
|
Assuming the situation with the crank will be OK and not really having the time to lose what I could get accomplished tonight, I forged ahead with the oil pan gasket, stud kit, etc.
I cleaned all the mounting holes by spraying some brake cleaner into them while the engine was right side up, then flipped the motor and used some Q-tips to get the threaded mounting holes really clean. I then loctited the studs into the engine. I first put in a couple that didn't have the through hole to see at what length they bottomed out, then used a caliper to set this distance and installed all the studs to the same depth, specifically the ones with through holes where they would turn through as long as I want them to. I reinstalled the pickup assembly into the pan I bought, cleaned up both surfaces really well, then set the gasket onto the studs and then the pan onto to gasket. Then I put on the washers and threaded the lock nuts on until I felt the resistance of the nylok portion. I'm going to let the loctite setup overnight so that when I go to tighten the nuts, the studs that don't bottom out won't turn in. This will also let the weight of the pan sit on the gasket overnight to get it nice and flat before I torque it down. I'll probably use an allen wrench to hold the stud at the same time I tighten the nut. I'm also going to change my coolant to orange Dexcool from the green ethylene glycol I had been running since the orange has better anti-corrosion properties, so I put the heater control valve to full hot and flushed the heater core of the green coolant using a hose until the water ran out clear (note one bucket was green and the final one was clear). That's it for tonight. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cf36cafc27.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...75c490be17.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5303891eb7.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8413543b72.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4dc628e434.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...745c1356b2.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2bf1997c1f.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5189b07cd4.jpg By the way, this Sunex engine stand is great. It effortlessly allows rotating the motor and holds it in any position where you stop the handle. There's no "flop" as you cross over the top either. Thanks GB for the recommendation in a different thread that I came across. |
I don't see a shoulder on those studs and that concerns me. They also look long, but maybe that's just an optical illusion. The barrel on the stud should look like the barrel around a night-crawler. Without the barrel, the stud will not stop turning in. They are supposed to be installed until the barrell (aka shoulder) of the stud stops further turns, then given a little pre-torque to set the stud.
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff97ac82e4.jpg |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15821636)
I don't see a shoulder on those studs and that concerns me. They also look long, but maybe that's just an optical illusion. The barrel on the stud should look like the barrel around a night-crawler. Without the barrel, the stud will not stop turning in. They are supposed to be installed until the barrell (aka shoulder) of the stud stops further turns, then given a little pre-torque to set the stud.
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff97ac82e4.jpg Carl, you're correct that there aren't any shoulders on these studs that came with that kit, so I'm hoping the loctite and counter holding the stud will allow them to torque down properly, since they require so little torque. If not, I'll have to replace the studs with a set like you've pictured. I'll do the ones that bottom out first to get a fell for what 30 in.lbs. of torque feels like then do the others with through holes uses what feels like a similar forces, as there isn't really a way to get a standard torque wrench on some of them anyway. Length doesn't look too bad though, but maybe just slightly long, and only for the 4 in the center of the pan where the OEM bolts are usually shorter, as all the studs in this kit are the same length. Being the engine guru that you are, is that crankshaft OK to proceed with? |
Mount the starter to see if the studs are too long causing an interference problem.
|
Kevin is right, if they are too long, you will have trouble mounting the starter.
Loctite is an anaerobic product. It only congeals in the absence of air. It is the pre-torque on the threads that stretches the fastener and seals the threads against air. I think, in the absence of pre-torque, the Loctitie will not set and you will find your studs will turn when met with the self-locking nut. Try it and see. I cannot comment on the crank, I see no pics with any bearing caps removed, and of course, micrometer readings. I strongly recommend you replace the con rod bearings right now, you will never have a better chance and its a great way to boost oil pressure. Besides - its the only way to inspect those rod journals. Replacing rod bearings is an easy job. |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15821764)
Mount the starter to see if the studs are too long causing an interference problem.
Here' my starter before I took it loose and I see the potential for interference you're talking about with the studs directly above it. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c1cf751dc0.jpg Here's the normal starter bracket I had to cut off the new motor https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6dcd5a58a7.jpg |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15821842)
I cannot comment on the crank, I see no pics with any bearing caps removed, and of course, micrometer readings. I strongly recommend you replace the con rod bearings right now, you will never have a better chance and its a great way to boost oil pressure. Besides - its the only way to inspect those rod journals. Replacing rod bearings is an easy job. I"m not going to undertake further disassembly at this point, so won't be taking the connecting rods apart to change the bearings. Need to get the car put back together and on the road. If the project gets more extensive than this, it runs the risk of getting boxed up and setting on the lift for the summer as I"m approaching having too much else going on with work travel and the kids school year ending to have the time to continue with it. I'm moving past the disassembly point and into reassembly. If it has a major issue after being put back together, at least it will be together and occupying less space than it currently is, but hoping for the best. I'll be using a Break In oil once it's put back together which should help remove some of the oil build up it looks like is here and dissolve the Assembly Lube that's on some of the parts as they go back together, then running my normal Driven DT50 after that. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...438cbdbc17.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d0234edb59.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3c7942298b.jpg |
Those counterweight marks seem a little unusual, but the crank is forged and the major diameter of that section simply did not flow out far enough to be machined off like the rest of the counterweight. Not the best job on a crank from Porsche that I have seen, but not a failure point, either.
Disagree with your decision not to even inspect the rod bearings while you are here. At the least, pull rod caps on #2 and #6 and inspect. That will tell you a LOT. If you don't, and it has worn or damaged bearings, your time with this motor in the car could be real short. Its up to you. |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15821955)
Those counterweight marks seem a little unusual, but the crank is forged and the major diameter of that section simply did not flow out far enough to be machined off like the rest of the counterweight. Not the best job on a crank from Porsche that I have seen, but not a failure point, either.
Disagree with your decision not to even inspect the rod bearings while you are here. At the least, pull rod caps on #2 and #6 and inspect. That will tell you a LOT. If you don't, and it has worn or damaged bearings, your time with this motor in the car could be real short. Its up to you. |
If you remove the caps WSM calls for replacing the rod end nuts.
You can see the slippery slope in the distance.... |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15822395)
If you remove the caps WSM calls for replacing the rod end nuts.
You can see the slippery slope in the distance.... Quick question - when installing a Porken Tensioner, do you install it with the OEM tensioner gasket (I have a new one on hand) or just right up against the metal framework of the engine? |
What kind of rebuild did it get that the internals are that gummy after only 1500 miles?
At the very least (re-) torque each rod nut with a 12 point 14 mm socket to 54 ft lbs. Don't loosen, just a nice slow pull to ensure that they're all at spec. |
Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
(Post 15822523)
What kind of rebuild did it get that the internals are that gummy after only 1500 miles?
At the very least (re-) torque each rod nut with a 12 point 14 mm socket to 54 ft lbs. Don't loosen, just a nice slow pull to ensure that they're all at spec. https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...19-engine.html |
I guess I am just a little less trusting. Its a long way in when rod bearings are bad. I always feel that a used engine was removed from a car for a reason, and I'd like to know that the reason wasn't the engine. I do not know the providence of this motor, so if you do, then perhaps you can skip some of these checks.
|
Ah, I see- Josh did nice work on that motor, the head work is first rate and the compression figures look good, but he didn't touch the bottom end on a ~200+ K mile motor. They're _probably_ fine, but at the very least I'd pull the 2-6 bearing caps and mic the bearings, just for giggles. It's $10 worth of new rod nuts and an excuse to buy a ball-end micrometer.
|
You would buy new nuts and take a few off. Mains don’t wear very much.
|
I took Rob's advice and removed all the lock nuts and washers that I had loosely installed last night. Checking the torque on the connecting rod cap fasteners, all were essentially properly tensioned - 2 of them moved just a hair, like maybe 1-2 ft.lbs..
Forged ahead with the silicone pan gasket install, but while I had the pan back off took a look at the stud kit that was on the pan of my 4.5L motor, which is the 928MS version that Carl installed during my original engine work, as I thought I would remove any that might interfere with the starter and clip them a little shorter as I have a metric screw cutter. In comparing them, the 928MS ones don't actually look like they protrude any less, so I didn't do anything about shortening them as the starter was bolted onto the 4.5L motor without any interference issues. Also, the Loctite gel I applied last night, held the studs that don't bottom out perfectly secure as I went through the torquing process on the oil pan to 25 in.lbs. It took a number of passes criss-crossing as I went to achieve the torque spec that would remain when I checked on the next pass, but now all 30 fasteners are torqued the same and holding that value - looking forward to a dry engine and garage floor now. Here are both versions of the stud kits for comparison - Rogers on the shiny clean engine and Carl's on the dirty 4.5L engine. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...06a7c05fb5.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...49a0914fd4.jpg Then I flipped the motor back over and mounted a couple of the cooling system pieces I had painted with new gaskets, including the inlet elbow at the rear of the motor I had modified and the opposing side block-off plate. Can't do the front water bridge yet as it adds a lot of height and will make reinstalling the motor into the car while it sits on the lift more challenging, which is why I removed them when I was pulling the motor. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ed75bf461e.jpg Then I cleaned up the pan and pickup that came on the 4.7L motor and will probably list them for sale or take them to SITM. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dc638c9ce3.jpg |
On the rod question, you DO have the three piece cross brace, so it will be amazingly easy for you to do this in the future. Still, without knowing about your time constraints, I would probably do it now because it will be still easier on with the motor upside down.
|
Pete since you dont have the belt on yet I would suggest to remove the oil pump and fill it with STP oil,
then put it back in, The STP will make it easy for the oil pump to prime and pump. NOTE the oil is better than the grease and wont plug up the oil filter. please post pictures of the 2/6 rod bearings and crank for an accurate diagnosis. I would suggest to use PTFE non setting pipe sealant on the water pump bolts so the next time they come off they will. Use new bolts for the pump Same for the water bridge and the HCV housing and block off plate |
Originally Posted by Mrmerlin
(Post 15825108)
Pete since you dont have the belt on yet I would suggest to remove the oil pump and fill it with STP oil,
then put it back in, The STP will make it easy for the oil pump to prime and pump. NOTE the oil is better than the grease and wont plug up the oil filter. please post pictures of the 2/6 rod bearings and crank for an accurate diagnosis. I would suggest to use PTFE non setting pipe sealant on the water pump bolts so the next time they come off they will. Use new bolts for the pump Same for the water bridge and the HCV housing and block off plate I actually put the same BR30 oil into the pump that I'll be using for the engine start-up, before installing it. Turning the pump pulley by hand it makes a good sucking sound, so seems like it has a good seal and will pump just fine. |
What I have tried to do is loop the oil cooler and just before the belt goes on, and everything else is on, I prime the oil pump with pressure. Not sure if that helps or hinders, but I have done that a few times.
|
Pete, you may want to get one of these. Allows you to connect a hose to deliver the used oil without the usual mess.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...940ce74b23.jpg |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15825564)
Pete, you may want to get one of these. Allows you to connect a hose to deliver the used oil without the usual mess.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...940ce74b23.jpg I bought one of those, but it was a different model that was specified for the early cars and it doesn't thread in properly, like the thread pitch is incorrect. Maybe I need to try the one you've shown. Will that one fit my early to mid oil pans? |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15825574)
I bought one of those, but it was a different model that was specified for the early cars and it doesn't thread in properly, like the thread pitch is incorrect. Maybe I need to try the one you've shown. Will that one fit my early to mid oil pans?
|
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15825595)
I really can't hazard a guess - I'm a 87+ specialist.
|
If you don't have the timing belt on yet, you can prime the whole oiling system and bring it up to pressure with an electric drill. Bits that fit a drill and snap into a 3/8" socket drive are common. Put the right socket on the nut and spin it up.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15830033)
If you don't have the timing belt on yet, you can prime the whole oiling system and bring it up to pressure with an electric drill. Bits that fit a drill and snap into a 3/8" socket drive are common. Put the right socket on the nut and spin it up.
|
|
Hmmm..... cordless oil-pump!
|
Nice! I'm learning enough following these threads to get myself not real trouble!
|
Picked up the parts from powdercoat on Friday and started serious reassembly today.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4ab83c04e5.jpg Parts from the powdercoater https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a4070bbc59.jpg Since they sandblasted them before coating, I wanted to make sure any sand was thoroughly flushed out. They looked too clean to run back through my garage parts washer since it has dirty cleaning fluid in it now from this project, so I used the other parts washer :) https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a5d6477652.jpg CM tower all greased up with lifters installed ready to go back on https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c8b64e2672.jpg Passenger side done with Cerakote coated SS round tube headers I picked up from Jim Doer https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...49d37011f8.jpg Driver's side completed with port for crankcase vent https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1d657f073c.jpg Both sides on along with preliminary setup of the Porken Tensioner I have the other cam tower caps (pulley side) in the freezer to make them contract a little, as they seem to be a pretty tight fit, even before I get to the o-ring sealing gaskets. |
Beautiful work, Pete.
Thanks for sharing, Dave |
Worked on a few things today, but couldn't do too much with it being mother's day and all.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6ae498d634.jpg Freezer trick worked and the ends are now installed, but I realized I'm missing a few small parts like the end seals and I need a new bushing on the driver's side. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b71635ac2a.jpg Took apart the spider intake to clean it up. This body will be sold with matching painted legs that I have, but these legs will get reused with the new spider body. Also spent some time going more cleanup and polishing on my stainless Y-pipe. I'm trying to get all the burned on oil from the prior engine off so it's slow going. |
As part of this engine project and because of the supercharger, I'm adding a knock detector even though the early cars didn't use them. This, along with the AFR gauge, and the updated distributor from a 4.7L car that has both advance and retard capability, I should be able to fine tune the advance timing for maximum benefit, but still protect the motor from knock occurring. The knock sensor is a kit from LINK systems, called their Knocklink and is self calibrating. It essentially learns what the motor sounds like under normal situations and then should it detect a knock outside of that normal, will flash a warning light in the cockpit (http://dealers.linkecu.com/G4KNL).
While I was waiting on some cam end shaft seals to arrive, I decided to tackle this one last night. I had already made a hole through the firewall for previous wiring projects, so passing the 2 strand shielded cable through from the cockpit to the engine compartment was pretty easy. The next challenge was trying to decide where to mount the warning light which also has the system controller built into it, so larger than just a warning light would need to be. I thought about up on the windshield visor area, but didn't think I wanted a flashing red light up there at night, considered the center console area, but couldn't come up with a plan that would look nice and in the day time, thought I might not see the warning light if down that far, and then I had a great idea.... Because my car is a convertible, I do not have a rear wiper, even though I still have a rear wiper switch that isn't used for anything. It would provide for a 12v switched circuit to power the knocklink when the key was on, an easily accessible ground wire, and be in a good position to catch it blinking without having to specifically direct my attention to it, so I pulled out the switch from the top right position of the pod and started looking at it to see if there was a way to install the warning light there. With some customizing (cannibalizing) of the old switch, it looks like it will work perfectly. Kit packaging and info including the Bosch brand knock sensor. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...46561a7722.jpg Pieces of the old rear wiper switch and the sensor mounted in it https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3419b855a8.jpg The sensor is a tight fit in both the rubber switch part, which is held tight by the Jager pod trim rings I use and I also used the back part of the switch that locks it into the dash pod hole https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3ee4f5f1c8.jpg\ Front view https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2f4d08c508.jpg Close-up installed in pod https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...04ae5d8ed6.jpg Wider angle view https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e2d1a18a06.jpg The knock sensor will mount in the center position of the block with an 8mm bolt that will thread into an adapter I've purchase. The adapter is an M14x1.5 plug with a threaded 8mm center hole. I'll install both with sealing washers to prevent any oil leaks. I've already successfully broken loose the center valley plug. The M6 bolt you see threaded into the flywheel side valley plug will be used for the ground location of the knock sensor (instruction say to ground it to the block as close as possible to the knock sensor. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8f2820004a.jpg Here's the harness that comes through the firewall. Ring terminal is for the ground and the other plug with the sensor wire will attach to the knock sensor once the motor is mounted back into the car. I'll clean up the red wire looping once everything is connected an I determine the optimal routing. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...734d6714da.jpg The only thing I couldn't test when coming up with this plan was whether the green wire that goes to the rear wiper switch is a 12v switched circuit or a constant 12v circuit since my battery is currently disconnected while working on the engine R & R. I was assuming it was switched since the wipers only work when the key is switched on, but because of wiper parking functions, wasn't 100% certain. Can anyone confirm tha's a switched wire? Thanks. |
That is a pretty neat device but based off their description of how it works, don't you think the constantly blinking lights will get really annoying, especially being mounted there? It will pretty much always be blinking in the bottom of your vision. The information it provides is useful but 99.99% of the time, you're only interested if it flashes red.. unless there's some way to configure that on the device so it only lights up if it detects an issue?
|
Originally Posted by NelaK
(Post 15841897)
That is a pretty neat device but based off their description of how it works, don't you think the constantly blinking lights will get really annoying, especially being mounted there? It will pretty much always be blinking in the bottom of your vision. The information it provides is useful but 99.99% of the time, you're only interested if it flashes red.. unless there's some way to configure that on the device so it only lights up if it detects an issue?
It changes color and blinks during initial startup, then displays a solid green light unless detonation is detected, in which case, it flashes red. So should be just a dim, solid green light all the time, unless knock is detected. If it's too bright, I'll cover the lens with a piece of tint film until I get the intensity right. |
I like your knock sensor system. Great job.
Dave |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15841963)
Here's a YouTube video that better shows what you'll see vs the description they provide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLJtTejxvYw It changes color and blinks during initial startup, then displays a solid green light unless detonation is detected, in which case, it flashes red. So should be just a dim, solid green light all the time, unless knock is detected. If it's too bright, I'll cover the lens with a piece of tint film until I get the intensity right. |
|
Don't expect much viable data from knock sensors on early 928 engines.
Porsche, in their infinite wisdom, has used pistons with "offset" piston pins, virtually forever. (The piston pin isn't centered in the middle of the piston, but is moved towards one wall (skirt) of the piston.) 356's, 911's, 914's, 924's, 944's, and 928's (up to the introduction of knock sensors in 1987) were all this way. The "rub" is that on all the engines with pistons on different sides (everything except inline 4 cylinders), the pistons have an up and down (different size valve reliefs for intake and exhaust. This means that the offset of the piston, in relationship to the crankshafts is different from side to side of the engine. One side of the engine ends up with the offset such that "piston slap" is reduced. The other side has the offset up in the incorrect direction and the piston slap is greatly increased (But, interestingly enough, makes slightly more power.) Not their "brightest" engineering moment. And, frankly, a bit "thickheaded" to keep making this mistake over and over again....model after model. Especially "slow" for a company that "hangs their hat" on their superior engineering capability. When they developed the knock sensor system, the piston slap from the pistons that were backwards in the engine, fooled the knock sensors to the point where they were useless. Porsche was forced to make pistons with symmetrical valve reliefs (in 1987 and later), so that the pistons could be installed with the valve reliefs facing the correct direction, eliminating piston slap. (^^^^^^This concept can be difficult for "normal people" to grasp. Trust me, it's a big deal.) |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15843476)
Don't expect much viable data from knock sensors on early 928 engines.
Porsche, in their infinite wisdom, has used pistons with "offset" piston pins, virtually forever. (The piston pin isn't centered in the middle of the piston, but is moved towards one wall (skirt) of the piston.) 356's, 911's, 914's, 924's, 944's, and 928's (up to the introduction of knock sensors in 1987) were all this way. The "rub" is that on all the engines with pistons on different sides (everything except inline 4 cylinders), the pistons have an up and down (different size valve reliefs for intake and exhaust. This means that the offset of the piston, in relationship to the crankshafts is different from side to side of the engine. One side of the engine ends up with the offset such that "piston slap" is reduced. The other side has the offset up in the incorrect direction and the piston slap is greatly increased (But, interestingly enough, makes slightly more power.) Not their "brightest" engineering moment. And, frankly, a bit "thickheaded" to keep making this mistake over and over again....model after model. Especially "slow" for a company that "hangs their hat" on their superior engineering capability. When they developed the knock sensor system, the piston slap from the pistons that were backwards in the engine, fooled the knock sensors to the point where they were useless. Porsche was forced to make pistons with symmetrical valve reliefs (in 1987 and later), so that the pistons could be installed with the valve reliefs facing the correct direction, eliminating piston slap. (^^^^^^This concept can be difficult for "normal people" to grasp. Trust me, it's a big deal.) |
Camshaft seals from Roger arrived today so Bank 1-4 is now put together. Waiting on the cam spacer for the 5-8 side and then I'll assemble that one too. New (used) distributor with both advance and retard ports installed too with a new sealing ring. It will get a new rotor and cap too.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...130e3bb085.jpg Waiting on a couple more things that arrive tomorrow & Friday and then I can really start making some reassembly progress - going to be a busy weekend. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15843476)
Don't expect much viable data from knock sensors on early 928 engines.
Porsche, in their infinite wisdom, has used pistons with "offset" piston pins, virtually forever. (The piston pin isn't centered in the middle of the piston, but is moved towards one wall (skirt) of the piston.) 356's, 911's, 914's, 924's, 944's, and 928's (up to the introduction of knock sensors in 1987) were all this way. The "rub" is that on all the engines with pistons on different sides (everything except inline 4 cylinders), the pistons have an up and down (different size valve reliefs for intake and exhaust. This means that the offset of the piston, in relationship to the crankshafts is different from side to side of the engine. One side of the engine ends up with the offset such that "piston slap" is reduced. The other side has the offset up in the incorrect direction and the piston slap is greatly increased (But, interestingly enough, makes slightly more power.) Not their "brightest" engineering moment. And, frankly, a bit "thickheaded" to keep making this mistake over and over again....model after model. Especially "slow" for a company that "hangs their hat" on their superior engineering capability. When they developed the knock sensor system, the piston slap from the pistons that were backwards in the engine, fooled the knock sensors to the point where they were useless. Porsche was forced to make pistons with symmetrical valve reliefs (in 1987 and later), so that the pistons could be installed with the valve reliefs facing the correct direction, eliminating piston slap. (^^^^^^This concept can be difficult for "normal people" to grasp. Trust me, it's a big deal.) I understand what you're saying about the offset wrist pin location in the piston, as the 997 M97 motors are the same way, and I think maybe the Cayennes too. In some of these engines, they think it might be a contributor to bore scoring as the piston "rocks" during it's travel in the cylinder due to the offset pin position on one side. |
My understanding is that Cayenne bore scoring happen on cold starts in very cold environments. My guess is that the piston fit is too tight and that as the piston warms up very much faster than the block it is briefly too big. Maybe too simple minded though.
|
Kevin Wilson (aka Jetson...) bought a Cayenne while at the last Frenzy. Borescope revealed some scoring and intermittent check engine light. Came with a complete replacement engine. Soon after he bought it threw a code - a timing chain jumped. Local Porsche dealership offered to empty Kevin's wallet. Instead. Kevin shipped the Cayenne back to VA to be repaired, bought a used head to harvest the broken tensioner and since repaired is running great - in fact he drove it to Missouri and back with no issues. My guess is the earlier codes were due to the failing tensioner. The replacement engine is sitting in a storage unit outside Atlanta.
|
Tonight I used a new tool that's designed to make the cutting of silicone hoses, fast, easy, and most importantly, precise.
On my car I'm running Euro intake legs and a non-Euro body, primarily because I found these beautiful red powdercoated intake legs a few years ago that looked at lot better than the ones I had painted. The challenge with this setup is that the diameter of the leg ends is larger than the fittings where they connect on the manifold. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3598f7e736.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6e99d5646d.jpg The non-Euro version of the couplers fit the manifold well, but are really tight on the legs, and the Euro versions fit the legs perfectly, but are too loose on the manifold. Figuring tighter is better than looser, I had been using the non-Euro versions and just stretching them over the Euro leg ends, but a couple of them had started to tear at the edges, and I assume the intake air going from a larger opening to a smaller one, without any sort of transition, probably created a little turbulence, though probably not enough to matter since the car ran great. But while I was doing all of this, I decided it would be great if I could find a source for a coupler that was the proper size on each end with a smooth transition between them, and in doing some online research, came across www.siliconeintakes.com that has all types of high-quality, multi-ply, silicone hoses available. They make a silicone reducer that goes from 1.875" (47.625mm) on one side to 1.75"(44.45mm) on the other, which is just about perfect, as both ends are just a little smaller than the pieces they slide onto, so I ordered 8. The next challenge with them is that they're about 3" (78.53mm) in length, and the OEM couplers are only 42.75mm, so I would need to trim them down to a proper length, as you don't want them to extend beyond the smooth flange on the leg, and they can't extend on the manifold as they hit the body sides. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6a05e87846.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c868415b28.jpg Having worked with silicone hose in the past (my custom cold air intake project), I was kind of dreading the trimming down process as I've tried a number of different techniques (band saw with a fine tooth blade which can get a little exciting if the band binds a little in the soft silicone, a razor knife cutting against a PVC pipe edge as a guide, etc, but none of them work all that well, and you end up with rough or wavy edges or have to try and recut a small strip to try and get it smoother, which usually just makes it worse. Enter the Redback - made by an Australian company, it's an awesome tool for precision cutting silicone hoses up to 4" in diameter. It clamps in your vice, gives you various sized guide discs, a precision arm that's adjustable for the length of hose you want to cut, and uses a razor knife blade that you engage with the hose, then rotate the hose to make the cut. I can't tell you what a nice design and quality piece this is with anodized aluminum, a case that neatly organizes the two sets of discs (a top set and bottom set to support the hose at both ends), the guide pins, the assembly itself, etc - it's just first rate. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1b8353c6e6.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8945954dce.jpg ....but most importantly, it works. and works well ! https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7d29b72517.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...35152a6a1d.jpg I had to cut both sides of each reducer to keep the transition section centered between the two ends and checking the fitment, I ended up trimming more from the smaller end and less from the larger end, as they fit together better that way. When doing the measuring, I wanted the finished product to be just a little bit longer than the OEM ones, but just 1-2mm or so. The leg flange is 19.68mm and the manifold flange is 23.07mm so together, that's 42.75mm and the OEM coupler length is exactly 42.75mm, but the two parts have a slight gap between them when installed. Making the couplers just a little longer would have them fully cover the leg and manifold flanges, but not exceed past the lip on the leg flange, and go all the way to the side of the manifold body. Since the silicone hose is slipperier than the OEM rubber pieces, I wanted to do this to help keep them from sliding in either direction due to the high pressure air of the forced induction system. What I ended up with is 8 perfectly sized couplers, with smooth and straight cuts - no way I would have been able to achieve this type of consistency and quality without this tool. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...56b18f8189.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c72a083e73.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c6e8ff3cfc.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...100bc1dd41.jpg Don't worry, there are 8 of them - one was still on the cutter in this picture https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...869bf16abf.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1113be7fd8.jpg Pegasus Racing Supplies is the one that sells Redback tool (I discovered them when looking for a metal canister oil filter cutting tool to inspect my filter media for debris during oil changes). Is it kind of expensive for a hose cutter - yup, but the quality is worth the price, and if you do this type of work on your cars, you'll look forward to the next project where you're cutting hoses to fit, instead of dreading that part of it. Back to core engine stuff tomorrow. |
Sweet! Lots of great details coming from your documentation.
Thank you for taking the time to post all of this. |
Originally Posted by 928 GT R
(Post 15846793)
Sweet! Lots of great details coming from your documentation.
Thank you for taking the time to post all of this. Once the new 5-8 cam spacer arrives today (both my other ones were grooved), I'll be putting the pulley onto that side and finishing the timing and porken tensioner install. From a relationship perspective, am I correct in my understanding that this is how things should be put together so that simultaneously: The Crankshaft is set at TDC - red plastic arrow pointing to the line between the T|C on the harmonic balancer 1-4 cam pulley aligned with it's arrow mark 5-8 cam pulley aligned with it's arrow mark Distributor set with rotor pointing to it's thin alignment mark, which is also the position for cylinder 1 Rotating the motor around a couple times it should always come back to this state, correct? When I try to manually rotate the 1-4 cam pulley to align the mark on the pulley with the mark on the end plate, it feels like I'm compressing a valve spring and it does not want to stay there. I know once the belt is on and under tension that it will stay there, but is that phenomenon correct before the the belt is installed. Both the crank and the 5-8 pulley will align with their marks without that same resistance phenomenon. Also I've read that the 1-4 pulley mark might not exactly align with the mark on the cam tower cap. If not perfectly aligned do I want the mark on the pulley to be indexed slightly to the counterclockwise side of the arrow on the cap or slightly to the clockwise side of the arrow on the cap, or should I get an offset woodruff key from Carl at 928MS to make it perfectly aligned, if it's not? Thanks for the help. |
The WSM has a fairly lame discussion on the actual timing belt install. I prefer the one in the porkensioner manual: http://liftbars.com/docs/PKT-S_install.pdf
Its been a while since I did my 16V car, but I did my S4 a few weeks ago, and I was really surprised that I did not have to fight the valve springs much to get the belt on. Some of it may depend on where you do the installation. I think I may have done it at TDC before and this time I did it at 45BDTC or whatever the other point is. |
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15847962)
The WSM has a fairly lame discussion on the actual timing belt install. I prefer the one in the porkensioner manual: http://liftbars.com/docs/PKT-S_install.pdf
Its been a while since I did my 16V car, but I did my S4 a few weeks ago, and I was really surprised that I did not have to fight the valve springs much to get the belt on. Some of it may depend on where you do the installation. I think I may have done it at TDC before and this time I did it at 45BDTC or whatever the other point is. Thanks, but with my engine not having a belt on it or a distributor installed, and the cams having been removed, how do I use any of the alignment marks for pulleys, distributor, etc if I set the crank at 45 BTDC? Don't those only all line up at TDC, especially the distributor for spark timing? |
Hi Pete.
Your description of valve tension on the 1-4 cam sounds about right. Once the belt is installed, you should get everything into synch, just as you described. It took me a couple of tries, but I was able to get my belt on a tooth that aligned all three markers, to my limit of discernment. Turn it several times and confirm, but I think you will be fine. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15848040)
Hi Pete.
Your description of valve tension on the 1-4 cam sounds about right. Once the belt is installed, you should get everything into synch, just as you described. It took me a couple of tries, but I was able to get my belt on a tooth that aligned all three markers, to my limit of discernment. Turn it several times and confirm, but I think you will be fine. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by NelaK
(Post 15843495)
I don't know anything about engine design so this might be a stupid question but what about the Cayenne engine? I vaguely recall that they have a similar setup... Along with a tendency to kill themselves with bore scoring and a lot of piston slap.
I believe that the Germans are thick headed enough to always use pistons with offset pins.....because that is what they have been doing....forever. So, unless there are two separate part numbers for pistons, you can take it to the bank that both the 997 engines and the Cayenne piston failures (in cold weather) are primarily caused by the improper piston geometry on one side of the engine. Porsche "got away" with doing this by iron plating the pistons that went into the Alusil bores (up to the new generation of engines), but as soon as the "bean counters" took over engineering and used "Ferroprinted" pistons, the "gig" was over. Added content: Years ago, I tried a set of "Ferroprinted" Mahle 968 pistons in a 928 engine. It ran for a couple of days until the Ferroprint flaked off and ruined the bore. Mahle said it wasn't their problem....want to bet they are telling Porsche the same thing? Again, the "Common Sense Department" would have known this and saved everybody millions of dollars. |
So, I put a few quarts of oil into the pan, a filter on, and spun up the oil filter with a drill. Looking in through the water bridge assembly hole, oil is flowing out of the crankshaft bearings.
Unfortunately oil is also seeping from the bottom of the head gaskets on cylinders 1,5, and 6. What do I do now? I can check the tension of the top head bolts, but where are the bottom ones and will tightening them resolve the issue or do the heads need to come off and new gaskets be installed, where I have to undo a bunch of what I've already done? Any chance these gaskets will swell back up and reseal themselves? https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8d4de8f5b2.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7eb7fd0957.jpg |
Previous post might be a false alarm. I wiped off what I saw in those pictures and spun the pump a good bit more and there is no new evidence of oil there.
I'm now thinking that maybe when the motor was upside down and I was working on the pan that some oil may have settled there and that's what I saw when I was looking for leaks. I'll spin it a few more times to see if there's any new evidence of oil there, but don't see any on either side now. 🤞 |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15848625)
Previous post might be a false alarm. I wiped off what I saw in those pictures and spun the pump a good bit more and there is no new evidence of oil there.
I'm now thinking that maybe when the motor was upside down and I was working on the pan that some oil may have settled there and that's what I saw when I was looking for leaks. I'll spin it a few more times to see if there's any new evidence of oil there, but don't see any on either side now. 🤞 You need to spin the pump enough to build up pressure to check for leaks, BTW. |
I spun it a bunch more and didn't see any more oil in any of those areas, or any others - phew!
So I proceeded with the timing belt and tensioner installation. Belt on - everything at TDC and aligned https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6456bb3b13.jpg Turned the motor over 4 revolutions then took these pics. 5-8 https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...533c37087c.jpg 1-4 https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e571d5b3c5.jpg Distributor https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2ddaa6a384.jpg Harmonic Balancer https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a97beba69e.jpg Then had an expert help me by turning the motor over 2 more times and checked all the marks again. Looked just like the above. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e027066875.jpg X https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1ee4708b29.jpg So we put the covers on. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...192b6525bd.jpg Motor is going back into the car in the morning and then I'll start reassembling all the accessories. Above timing alignment photos are good, right? |
With the crank at TDC, the cam marks look perfect. I'm less confident about the distributor, my understanding is the rotor should point straight forward. I think you're a distributor gear tooth or two behind. But maybe it's different for L-jet motors, I don't know.
|
Keep rolling, Pete!
|
Originally Posted by Rob Edwards
(Post 15849618)
With the crank at TDC, the cam marks look perfect. I'm less confident about the distributor, my understanding is the rotor should point straight forward. I think you're a distributor gear tooth or two behind. But maybe it's different for L-jet motors, I don't know.
|
Nice progress!
:cheers: |
Looks good Pete. I see you have the dual vacuum input distributor.
Good luck, Dave |
Productive day....
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4461693b4a.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...41507c6dc1.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...40b1f4fe27.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c113f0c519.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c25d52f278.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...590c91362c.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...77c594ce75.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ab44b498b0.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d74f670ddc.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...324b2cdbd4.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9b1f77c33c.jpg Also checked, and the starter will bolt up fine without any clearance issues with the oil pan studs |
That is some serious progress, good work.
I think the starter is grounded through the mating surface of the lower bellhousing cover. I'm not sure if the bolts will be able to pass enough current. If you have a weak or no crank situation I will bet that is why and the powder coating will have to be sanded off that area. |
Beautiful.
Keep the good work, both of you! :thumbup: |
Nicely done. You dropped it in with the bellhousing and clutch installed?
|
Originally Posted by Majestic Moose
(Post 15850963)
That is some serious progress, good work.
I think the starter is grounded through the mating surface of the lower bellhousing cover. I'm not sure if the bolts will be able to pass enough current. If you have a weak or no crank situation I will bet that is why and the powder coating will have to be sanded off that area. |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 15851056)
Nicely done. You dropped it in with the bellhousing and clutch installed?
Yes, it came out with the bellhousing on - figured it would go back in the same way. Just the bellhousing though - I installed the clutch again from underneath. With my Z06 torque tube, there is virtually no space between the torque tube and upper bell housing and am not sure I would have been able to get it attached with the alignment pins the other way. I also had the motor brackets installed on the mounts already so once the motor was in place, fattened it with the 4 long bolts from underneath. The leveler on the hoist helps a lot, but it would have been better if I had set the chains longer and had the leveler handle on the hoist side rather than the car side. |
Beautiful, Pete. This engine looks great.
Thanks for sharing, Dave |
Originally Posted by Majestic Moose
(Post 15850963)
That is some serious progress, good work.
I think the starter is grounded through the mating surface of the lower bellhousing cover. I'm not sure if the bolts will be able to pass enough current. If you have a weak or no crank situation I will bet that is why and the powder coating will have to be sanded off that area. Working on hanging all the accessories today. Power steering pump and alternator are in place. Moving on to the PS lines and reservoir, then the a/c compressor, then might do a wake boarding run witb the kids before diving back in after dinner. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6ade6b5515.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...aa8051d74f.jpg |
|
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15851579)
Do the teeth on the flywheel look worn, or is it just the picture?
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c161031767.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...55a0d155d7.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ccfb8bd62a.jpg |
Dabbled a bit more this evening.
Installed a new clutch slave cylinder and Greg Brown pressure line for it Mounted the supercharger mounting plate and started routing some of the wires and plugged in a few things Mounted the A/C compressor I"m not doing any belts until the end so I can leave the crank pulleys off and have more space to work on the front of the motor. Also realized that in buying replacements for my aged power steering lines, that I bought two presure lines of different types - one has the banjo fittings and both ends and the other has the banjo fitting at the rack end and male threaded fitting for the pump at the other end which is the one I need, but I don't have a return line so Roger is working on that tomorrow. Unfortunately for me, the line in did the DEI Firesleeving to is the dual banjo one, so I'll be adding this brand new line with fire sleeving to my parts for sale thread when I'm done with this project. I've ordered another DEI kit to do the proper line that is already installed in the car, but it's coming back out again https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...aa1b8190a2.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5946cb08bc.jpg |
Installed:
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4bb05d7e10.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...52e0bc9697.jpg |
Returned from a business trip tonight and got a couple things done.
Polished and reinstalled the coolant reservoir with the new level sensor. It tests the same as the one I removed so either they're both bad or probably both good and they only work when sitting in fluid. Connected the coolant hoses associated with the reservoir, the Y Pipe along the side of the engine bay and the front smaller diameter coolant hose. Installed the crankcase ventilation system Checked and adjusted the distributor position with the motor at TDC and have it pointing directly to the #1 contact on the cap. Installed new rotor and new Bosch cap. More to come tomorrow. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2b5721bad6.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9fbe45da29.jpg |
Had a pretty productive day today, mostly under the car.
Front bell housing and pulleys are installed and torqued to 218 ft lbs. Reinstalled the clutch slave cylinder after having to take it loose to install the flywheel lock to torque the crank bolt, then pressurized the brake system with my Motive pressure bleeder and bled the new slave cylinder. Clutch feels super smooth now. Fire sleeved the correct power steering hose and installed it at both ends. Ran the sleeving down to the last 90 degree bend and left it open so in the event of a leak or burst, it can escape it the bottom away from the heat rather than burst the sleeve. Also received the emergency eBay PS return line Roger helped me source, since a new one from Germany was delayed, but unfortunately, it wasn't as represented in the auction photos and the rubber was cracking. Without any other options and the SITM deadline fast approaching, I used a tubing Cutter to cut the line just below the metal to rubber junction and installed some high pressure hose (just in case), even though this is the low pressure return line, then installed that one into the car too. All the lines are connected to the pump, rack, and reservoir, but I haven't filled the reservoir yet, just in case something needs to come apart again. Installed the starter and connected the wiring. Connected the wiring to the alternator. Installed the painted exhaust heat shields, the polished Y-pipe, and the adapter for the SS round tube headers I bought. I don't think this one was made correctly as the holes in the two flanges are indexed slightly relative to each other, yet were too close to allow for two sets of bolts or nuts to meet in the center of the adapter. I put it on the drill press and made the holes larger by a couple of sizes, which then let me pass long bolts through the Y-pipe flange, the adapter, and the header flange to tighten all of them together. It's the only way I could figure out how to make it work. Tomorrow I'm hoping to get a good bit of the up top work done, like the fuel injection, supercharger, intake, etc so I can then start tuning later this weekend or early next week. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0081debba6.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a9ea7a0b76.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dfe78456a2.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...588efd61d1.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c035c00142.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3024400378.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...baf819d819.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b84e81d9fb.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8438c448f4.jpg |
Accessory belts are in and tensioned.
K-Jet setup is in place with the two primary fuel lines connected. That took a little work to get it to clear the knock sensor I installed in the valley. Had to swap the position of the knock sensor and the ground, which is a little less than ideal as the knock sensor is now at the end instead of the center, and used slightly taller isolation mounts for the fueling module. I don't think that will cause an issue with the manifold. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f75f2247bb.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a31ff9e30e.jpg |
Beautiful (again!) :thumbup:
|
Got 2 of the 3 new Greg Brown fuel supply lines installed. After struggling with different combinations for a few hours last night and not finding a combination that works since it seems to need a smaller fitting on the end and another 90 degree bend like the cold start line has for my application, so I used the cold start line in that spot to keep the line profile as low as possible at the front of the motor and reused my old cold start injector line until I can sort it out.
Traced and hooked up a number of the vacuum lines. That's it for today as we're hitting the lake in the 95 degree heat. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8dd86f34fe.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2e79bc194.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...97a9bc533c.jpg |
Looks great, Pete. Don't forget to hook up the retard line to the distributor per <1982 TB connections. (The one way valve too).
Thanks for posting, Dave |
WOW!
This is one heck of a thread. I can not wait to see this car in person! Go Pete Go! > |
Thanks guys.
Power steering fluid is filled and not leaking (though the pump hasn't run yet), motor oil is topped up for the first start. Supercharger is reinstalled, along with the belt and tensioned, as well as a couple coolant hoses https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4ca544a69f.jpg Here's a question though.. The fitting on my old motor that feeds the heater core had a vacuum line fitting on the top of it that had a hose connected to it. That hose was T'd into another small diameter hose that runs along the passenger side fender wall under the coolant reservoir. The fitting I modified and installed on the new motor (because the old one was corroded and nasty) doesn't have this vacuum line fitting. Anyone know what this is for and can I just block off the vacuum line that used to go there or connect it somewhere else? Here are pictures of the old fitting with the vacuum port, the new fitting and the unconnected hose in the car. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...73e16f9a2f.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c132f34ad8.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...274701fee6.jpg |
The radiator with the pull fans is reinstalled and all the coolant system hoses are connected and tightened. I'll vacuum fill the system tomorrow with the Airlift using a 50/50 mix of Dexcool and Distilled Water.
A large portion of the intake is installed too as I had to do some of this in conjunction with the cooling system due to access. Also installed and connected the supercharger blow off valve. I think I need to lower the K-Jet setup though as I don't like the offset between the spider legs and intake manifold when I did a quick test fit on a couple. I've ordered some various vibration absorbing mounts and spacers in different combinations so I can set it as low as possible and still clear the knock sensor in the valley. Lower cross brace was installed last night too. Upper cross brace will be one of the last things to go on so I don't have to work around it. Reinstalled my previous extended dipstick since it's very difficult to get at the normal one with the supercharger installed. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d3624068d6.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b9a09a1d1f.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3076a2e24.jpg |
I vaguely recall this started as a head gasket replacement... At this point you're just shaming anyone else that wants to do a head gasket without redoing the entire engine compartment.
|
Originally Posted by NelaK
(Post 15869694)
I vaguely recall this started as a head gasket replacement... At this point you're just shaming anyone else that wants to do a head gasket without redoing the entire engine compartment.
|
Use the Airlift to vacuum fill the cooling system, which went great. Pulled vacuum to 25 on the gauge and had 5 gallons of Dexcool and Distilled water in a 5 gallon bucket with the feed line and it took about 4.5 gallons. I'll top that up after the first drive.
The bigger news is that the Spider intake is installed with the custom silicone couplers marrying the larger diameter Euro legs to the standard intake manifold. Took me about 6 hours to get to this point. When I test fit the legs to the body, because I had raised the body to clear the knock sensor, I was about 12mm off on the leg ends meeting up to the body ports :( I took most of the fueling loose again, changed the way the knock sensor was installed, which let me lower the fueling setup by about 8mm using some shorter vibration dampening mounts that arrived today. Next I measured the large coupler that joins the spider body to the throttle body and realized there was some space to be gained in that coupler leaving only about 1mm of clearance between the 2 metal flanges that meet in the coupler vs the 4mm or so designed into the OEM one. So, out came the Redback Cutter again and a scrap of 3" silicone hose from my intake projects and I cut a perfectly straight shorter coupler which got me to 11mm of the 12mm I needed. Figured that was close enough but forgot to factor in the about 1mm for the gaskets - perfect. Here's a shot of the old coupler and from the oil ring inside, you can see the gap that existed between the two flanges. Then a picture of the new silicone coupler installed. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a029b967d7.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6107d670e5.jpg Of course putting it back in I pinched the hard line for the boost gauge so had to loosen the mounting bolts a bit to free and reroute that, but I got it worked out. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ec5dc1fe4f.jpg Tomorrow (today actually), I'll connect fuel lines, plug wires, the intercooler hoses, the battery, and maybe turn the key to see what happens. |
Looks great, Pete. I'm kind of jealous.
:thumbup: Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15872351)
Looks great, Pete. I'm kind of jealous.
:thumbup: Dave |
I am truly in awe of how much you've accomplished in such a short period of time. Absolutely amazing.
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15872379)
Thanks Dave. No need to be jealous. You could do it in a couple months too - just have to decide your new bedtime is somewhere between 2-3 AM :)
It's amazing how well we work, when a project grabs us. I've been there too. My wife thinks I'm crazy during those periods. Thanks, Dave |
REASSEMBLY IS COMPLETE....
.... except for the hood and cowl cover as I need to wash the underside of the hood from the coolant steam that is all over it from the overheating event. I reconnected the battery and nothing went pop LOL so that's good news. Cycling the key to the accessory position also turned on the heat exchanger fan and pump, as it should. That also ran the fuel pump and showed me 1 fuel fitting that I forgot to tighten - it was the old line I used from the fuel distributor to the cold start valve at the FD side. Tightened it up, cycled the key again and all dry. Tomorrow, I'll fire it up and see what works, what doesn't, what leaks, what doesn't, set the timing and if all goes well put a few miles on it so I can top up the fluids, do an oil change to swap the BR40 oil for DT50 and install new spark plugs. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b4b2cbc790.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...787a9ff7b2.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...eacdae7a49.jpg |
That is a metric ton of work, looking good! Fingers crossed for startup tomorrow.
|
Very nice, Pete. I also put vacuum caps on my silicone hose clamps to save my skin. Your car looks fantastic.
Thanks, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15876622)
Very nice, Pete. I also put vacuum caps on my silicone hose clamps to save my skin. Your car looks fantastic.
Thanks, Dave I didn't do any disassembly of the k-jet system - just moved it over from one car to the other, and realize this motor may have different fueling requirements, but I should have been in the ballpark. It turns over much longer than the other engine used to before firing up and it doesn't run very smoothly once it does, then it fixes itself and the AFR becomes 12-13 and stays there a bit, then starts walking in one direction or the other until it dies. So, we'll be taking the 911 to SITM in the morning but I'm also not really sure how I'm going to resolve this prior to the Rendezvous. Thinking about trying to sweet talk Carl into heading for Atlanta a couple days early to swing by and work his magic as the other motor he set up was superb - fast start, rock stead idle, good AFR numbers, etc. |
To simplify, I would disconnect the intercooler feed to the engine intake in order to work-on and get the engine to run correctly NA first.
Once that's accomplished, hook-up the supercharger feed to the engine intake. |
To simplify, I would disconnect the intercooler feed to the engine intake in order to work-on and get the engine to run correctly NA first. Once that's accomplished, hook-up the supercharger feed to the engine intake. It may look fantastic, but I can't get it running right. AFRs are jumping all over the place. Sometimes it goes totally lean and just dies. Other times it goes totally rich and then dies. Other times it seems like it's running out of fuel. I've tried timing numbers from 20-30 DBTDC. I rebaselined the mixture screw at 9.5 turns from fully CCW. I put the Harmonic Dampener at TDC and popped the distributor cap and it's pointing directly at #1, I and put in new spark plugs. I tried a fuel pump jumper and a different FPR and no joy, and this is all without ever leaving the garage, so don't even know what issues will show up under load and boost. I didn't do any disassembly of the k-jet system - just moved it over from one car to the other, and realize this motor may have different fueling requirements, but I should have been in the ballpark. Also: check the WUR if you are using the one from the 4.7 They are mis-named, they are THE control regulator on a K-Jet and critical that it be working right. Again, swap in your known-good one from the 4.5L to see if it reacts better to that. |
Thanks for the responses. I didn't use any fueling from the 4.7L motor (didn't buy that with it) - it was all the stuff that ran perfectly from my 4.5 so no varnish issues
Fuel injectors and lines are brand new. WUR is the one from my 4.5 and that seems to work, as when the car is cold it fires up and runs the best, then I think the WUR shuts down and the engine starts relying on the other settings which is when it starts misbehaving. The intercooler does complicate the issue as it makes the mixture screw impossible to reach. If I pull off the intercooler then the supercharger wouldn't be doing anything even with the belt attached. Could it not be tuned this way with the metering assembly just open to atmosphere? |
Maybe try and make the engine run normally first? I always thought the ID of the SS lines was larger, thereby changing the tune requirements.
Things are never as they seem, and CIS is super tricky. |
Cant believe how much progress has been made in such a short period
Amazing |
Yes, you can sure tune it that way, many believe that is the best way. Don't think that its all in the 3mm mixture screw, it isn't. Check your ignition advance and idle air bleed screws as well.
Have a look at this description, its pretty good although its for a 911: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...-analyzer.html Then there's the bible: http://www.type17.ch/downloads/Injec...p%20Manual.pdf |
Totally normal. There seems to always be room for something you did not expect or something to be not quite right.
There is an orderly progression that will always find it, but I would start by: -triple checking the timing. I think the dist can go in wrong such that it is 180 out. -check the control pressures. Always a good idea. Fast and easy. -mason jar test the injection system. Pull the injectors, cut 8 lengths of fuel line, slip one over each injector, and run to 8 mason jars. Jumper the fuel pump, and move the control plate around by hand while watching the fuel flow. |
It wouldn't be any "fun" if it just started up and ran perfectly.....what would you do with yourself?
|
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15878817)
It wouldn't be any "fun" if it just started up and ran perfectly.....what would you do with yourself?
where is the like button. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15878817)
It wouldn't be any "fun" if it just started up and ran perfectly.....what would you do with yourself?
|
Originally Posted by karl ruiter
(Post 15878317)
:
-triple checking the timing. I think the dist can go in wrong such that it is 180 out. With the motor at TDC, should the rotor be on the scribe mark before installing, which actually makes it clocked past it when installed, or should it be set slightly before the scribe mark so that it's on the scribe mark once installed? Also, where in the slot does the lock down bolt usually end up when the timing is correct. Mine was toward the front of the slot but not all the way before I removed it. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15879383)
How can the distributor go in 180 degrees out. It has the lock down tab that the bolt goes through. Don't you rotate it before installation so that once installed the rotor points the scribe mark on the top edge of the distributor housing? When you press it in, because of the angle of the gears it rotates clockwise as they mesh, which brings up a question.
With the motor at TDC, should the rotor be on the scribe mark before installing, which actually makes it clocked past it when installed, or should it be set slightly before the scribe mark so that it's on the scribe mark once installed? Also, where in the slot does the lock down bolt usually end up when the timing is correct. Mine was toward the front of the slot but not all the way before I removed it. |
Might be a dumb question, but how many times does the distributor rotor rotate per revolution of the harmonic dampener? Is it a 1:1 relationship or could it be that I need to rotate the engine around one more time and then set the distributor position. Maybe this is what was meant by it being 180 degrees out.
|
Hi Pete,
Remember that distributor has vacuum ports on both sides of the diaphragm. If only one is connected (I can see the advance hose), it will act unopposed. This may give a bad timing curve vs rpm. If your timing light says it's reasonable, then this is not the problem. Just saying. Good luck, Dave |
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15879658)
At TDC both cam pulleys were on their marks and the distributor was on it's mark. |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15879564)
Hi Pete,
Remember that distributor has vacuum ports on both sides of the diaphragm. If only one is connected (I can see the advance hose), it will act unopposed. This may give a bad timing curve vs rpm. If your timing light says it's reasonable, then this is not the problem. Just saying. Good luck, Dave |
Sounds good Pete. I figured you had t covered.
Best of luck, Dave |
It may look fantastic, but I can't get it running right. AFRs are jumping all over the place. Sometimes it goes totally lean and just dies. Other times it goes totally rich and then dies. Other times it seems like it's running out of fuel. I've tried timing numbers from 20-30 DBTDC. I rebaselined the mixture screw at 9.5 turns from fully CCW. I put the Harmonic Dampener at TDC and popped the distributor cap and it's pointing directly at #1, I and put in new spark plugs. I tried a fuel pump jumper and a different FPR and no joy, and this is all without ever leaving the garage, so don't even know what issues will show up under load and boost. I didn't do any disassembly of the k-jet system - just moved it over from one car to the other, and realize this motor may have different fueling requirements, but I should have been in the ballpark. It turns over much longer than the other engine used to before firing up and it doesn't run very smoothly once it does, then it fixes itself and the AFR becomes 12-13 and stays there a bit, then starts walking in one direction or the other until it dies. Hard to diagnose from here! You'll get it. |
Looking for some clarification on the vacuum ports for the new distributor that has both advance and retard function, which my other did not.
|
Hi Pete,
According to WSM Section 24 pages 22 and 23, the retard line goes to the front of the TB next to the idle speed screw, label c, and the advance line goes to the almost exact location in the opposite, rear of the TB, label d. You can experiment with your distributor by applying Mitivac vacuum to its two connections. The top one advances and the bottom one retards. (You should verify this.) You should tee a check valve on the retard line so it cannot develop positive pressure (it will act as a 0 psi mini blow off valve). That will allow boost pressure on the advance side of the diaphragm, thus retarding the timing, with no positive pressure on the retard line to cancel it out. You can simulate this boost condition with the Mitivac, and watch with a timing light. BTW this is my interpretation of Hacker's design, and I use it on my 928MS Stage II setup. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15881164)
Hi Pete,
According to WSM Section 24 pages 22 and 23, the retard line goes to the front of the TB next to the idle speed screw, label c, and the advance line goes to the almost exact location in the opposite, rear of the TB, label d. You can experiment with your distributor by applying Mitivac vacuum to its two connections. The top one advances and the bottom one retards. (You should verify this.) You should tee a check valve on the retard line so it cannot develop positive pressure (it will act as a 0 psi mini blow off valve). That will allow boost pressure on the advance side of the diaphragm, thus retarding the timing, with no positive pressure on the retard line to cancel it out. You can simulate this boost condition with the Mitivac, and watch with a timing light. BTW this is my interpretation of Hacker's design, and I use it on my 928MS Stage II setup. Good luck, Dave |
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71e8dd4ed2.jpg
Here's a sketch, Pete. |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15881529)
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71e8dd4ed2.jpg
Here's a sketch, Pete. |
I hooked up the distributor retard port per Dave's diagram.
I also got some input from Jim Doerr on how to create a starting setting for the mixture screw on the K-Jet. I fully leaned the mixture screw (CCW) until it stopped, then jumpered the fuel pump relay, an opened the mixture screw (CW) until I heard the gas squealing, then closed it CCW until the squealing ceased, which took about 1 turn. I'm still struggling with the advance connection for the distributor as I had Ron AirtekHVAC look at his 82 Euro that has K-Jet and and a vacuum advance and retard distributor and his advance line is coming off the most passenger side port on the throttle body on the side opposite the idle screw and where the retard line is connected. However, on my car that port was previously used to link two additional vacuum diaphragms. From that throttle body port, the line goes to a side port on a secondary vacuum apparatus and then coming off a center port on that same apparatus, a line goes to the center port on a larger diaphragm apparatus and that larger one is connected to the throttle body by a large diameter line that's labeled "vacuum control port" on the drawings I've been able to find. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...33ad7d2d05.jpg Here's my distributor retard port setup now. Line comes from the port next to the idle control screw https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...badd398546.jpg Braided stainless lines are fancy vacuum lines, not fuel. Here's the smaller vacuum apparatus fed by the port off the throttle body that Dave and Ron say should feed the distributor advance port, and then a line from it feeds that larger diaphragm apparatus (next pic) https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7c397fb1f9.jpg Foreground is the larger vacuum apparatus connected by a large hose to the "vacuum control port" Didn't have much time today, but did a few things There was a capped off port right next to the one Dave and Ron say goes to their distributor advance port, so I uncovered that one and hooked my advance line to it. Don't know if that will work and those ports next to each other are multiples of the same thing or not. So after all this, I had to get the boat trailer out of the driveway due to neighborhood covenants and it being out there since I started this engine swap project so I had to move the 928. It started on the third set of cranking attempts and fired up rough, but actually smoothed out a bit after that and the RPMs rose to about 1,500 like they always do on a cold start. I put it into reverse and was relieved to see the car went into gear and letti g the clutch out was smooth and it engaged and backed the car up at idle speed, though the pedal engaged higher than it used to. Moved it into the driveway and shut it off. Moved the trailer onto the lift and went to move the car back into the garage. Took 3 attempts to start again and I had to move another car and it sat in the driveway and idled for probably 2 minutes, a little rough, before dying. Restarted on the first try and I pulled it into the garage, but this time the clutch made a squealing noise and the pedal didn't feel right and the clutch didn't really disengage as cleanly as when I backed it out. What does this clutch behavior tell you I need to look at? On the positive side, I did get the hood back on and aligned, and it closes, so it looks like a car again, and there also isn't anything dripping under the car (yet). https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5476cfc287.jpg Thanks. |
Here's an unencumbered view of the 2 additional vacuum assemblies I'm talking about, and how they're connected as I pulled them from the old motor.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9045ce47c0.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...70470dc40a.jpg |
Looks great Pete. I remember two ports very close together at the rear of the TB, and I used one of them for my advance connection. You can test with a boost gauge once you have the car running right. Your install is definitely first class.
Thanks, Dave |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15879383)
How can the distributor go in 180 degrees out. It has the lock down tab that the bolt goes through. Don't you rotate it before installation so that once installed the rotor points the scribe mark on the top edge of the distributor housing? When you press it in, because of the angle of the gears it rotates clockwise as they mesh, which brings up a question.
With the motor at TDC, should the rotor be on the scribe mark before installing, which actually makes it clocked past it when installed, or should it be set slightly before the scribe mark so that it's on the scribe mark once installed? Also, where in the slot does the lock down bolt usually end up when the timing is correct. Mine was toward the front of the slot but not all the way before I removed it.
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15879478)
Might be a dumb question, but how many times does the distributor rotor rotate per revolution of the harmonic dampener? Is it a 1:1 relationship or could it be that I need to rotate the engine around one more time and then set the distributor position. Maybe this is what was meant by it being 180 degrees out.
The distributor should be 'started' a bit early. The gears are helical cut so the rotor turns a bit as it goes 'down the gear teeth', you want the scribe mark 'dead on' when it's seated. The lock down bolt will end up where it ends up. You may be a tooth off in one direction or another, the rotor may not be in the exact same spot (if you removed it), the gear may be on the cam 'just a bit' differently for the new motor. There's a lot of variables that will affect exactly where the bolt ends up in the slot. You are more concerned with the timing being correct. |
I played around with the car some more today. Put in new plugs that are properly gapped at 028.
I can make the car run, but the idle still hunts and when the idle is falling the mixture is rich. When I Rev the motor, it gets lean. If I hold the pedal to make the RPMs go to 2,500-3,000 the AFR is decent for a few seconds then gets lean, like up to 17. Either I haven't turned the mixture screw to the rich side far enough yet or something else is going on. The AFR at idle is very rich, like at 10. The car won't Rev with a timing setting around 20 degrees BTDC and is much better at 28 degrees. Might be better still at 30 or more, but I'm concerned about going up that high. When I shut off the motor I can also hear the fuel squeaking as it continues to run in. Does this mean the mixture screw is too rich and if so, how can it be too rich when I revit up and the AFR gauge is showing that its too lean? I also tested it without the supercharger hooked up and it does the same thing, but the mixture at idle is even richer. Thoughts? On the plus side, I took the clutch out again last night and lubed the splined shaft with the proper grease and it seems to work very smoothly now, though I haven't moved it off the lift yet. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15895125)
On the plus side, I took the clutch out again last night and lubed the splined shaft with the proper grease and it seems to work very smoothly now, though I haven't moved it off the lift yet.
|
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 15895278)
What is the proper grease? Do you have a link to it?
Edit: Here you go. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1542ce57e7.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5f15a5444d.jpg |
When I had the 79 it did weird things when the fuel pump intake was collapsed and the intake pump died.
|
Originally Posted by BC
(Post 15895508)
When I had the 79 it did weird things when the fuel pump intake was collapsed and the intake pump died.
If there's any possibility of that, I'm thinking about reinstalling the original hard metal lines. The injectors are all brand new. |
I also figured out why my Knock-Link sensor wasn't initializing.
As you'll recall, I installed this while the battery was disconnected for the rest of the engine work and installed the light in the rear wiper position of the dash pod, so couldn't test the wires for switched 12v. Well, I had two problems
Installing the fuse and connecting to that wire now has the red light, then blue flashing light, then green light coming on, though I haven't started the car yet, just tested the initialization sequence. |
Today's update
Peter DeJong of Twin Turbo 928 fame graciously came to the house today with his CIS gauge set and knowledge of the K-Jet system from working on other comparably equipped 928s to try and help me resolve my running issues. From what we could tell, all the electrical plugs, fuel lines, and vacuum lines are connected correctly. I learned a good bit about how the CIS system works, actually learned to use my CIS gauge set that I bought a while back, and we discovered something that we think may be the culprit with the running issues, so I thought I'd share that here for additional input from the group. Testing the fuel pressure from the pump with the engine off and the fuel pump jumpered, we're seeing 145 psi of fuel pressure on the gauge. We thought this reading was a bit high, so disconnected his gauge set and connected mine, and got the same reading, so a lack of fuel pressure to the WUR doesn't seem to be the issue. I don't know if Carl bumped up the fuel pressure at the fuel distributor because of the supercharger, but will be talking with him tomorrow about this. With the supercharger out of the equation (air feed disconnected from the K-Jet metering plate), if we set the mixture in the 12 - 12.5 AFR range and the idle around 85-950 rpm when the engine is idling, we would get a repeatable fluctuation where the car would idle well, then stumble as the AFR got rich, like around 10, then recover and go back to 12.5 for a few seconds, then stumble again at 10, and so on. It would stay running like this for almost as long as we wanted it to. So we hooked up the gauge set to monitor the return pressure from the WUR. When the car was idling well at around a 12.5 AFR, the pressure on the gauge was around 130 psi, then it would start falling and when the engine started stumbling (and the AFR would drop to 10), pressure was only around 48 psi. It would keep repeating this cycle as you can see in this short video I shot. I reconnected the supercharger and the car exhibited the exact same behavior. If I hold the revs at 2,000, the AFR would get lean, like to around 14, and if I moved up to 3,000 the AFR would go full lean to 18. If I played with the mixture screw to where at 2,000 and 3,000 RPM I had good AFR #s at around 12.5, then at idle the AFR # would be around 10 and I could visibly see both the exhaust coming out and a stream of smoke coming from my crankcase ventilation setup under the car. But with this setting on the mixture screw, the idle at 10 would hold steady and not do the fluctuation dance shown in the video. So I decided to try and drive the car this way to see what would happen. It runs and would stay running at idle just like it did in the garage, but if I'd try to accelerate hard, it would go full lean still on the AFR gauge to 18 and start missing. I could never get the boost needle to go above zero before it would get fully lean. I know the AFR idle setting of 10 is way too rich, but based on the above tests and results, what do you guys think the problem is. Did my WUR somehow go bad and it's not metering the fuel to the motor correctly or is there something else I should be looking at. 2 other things, testing the vacuum advance and retard of the new distributor, neither would work. Peter discovered that the arm that goes on the pin and pulls the distributor was disconnected. He fixed it once but I came off again in the next round of testing so I took it apart and discovered the arm was actually a little bent, which is what was allowing it to come off the pin. I straightened the arm and reconnected it onto the pin and using a Mighty-vac tester, was able to both advance and retard the timing depending on which port I was connected to, so that problem now seems to be fixed. Also, the clutch action is very good - smooth and the new friction discs don't grab and shudder like the prior Spec units even when trying to start of on an incline, so looks like I have that problem rectified too, which will make driving the car much more enjoyable, providing I can get the motor running right. Still hoping to get the car ready to make the Rendezvous event in Atlanta in a few weeks. Thanks for any guidance or suggestions. |
Hi Pete,
It sounds like fuel pressure is not being regulated properly. Does K-jet have a separate fuel pressure regulator or is it part of the fuel distributor? Glad you fixed the distributor. I was lucky. When I tested mine with the Mityvac, it worked right away. Sounds like you're making progress. Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15897758)
Hi Pete,
It sounds like fuel pressure is not being regulated properly. Does K-jet have a separate fuel pressure regulator or is it part of the fuel distributor? Glad you fixed the distributor. I was lucky. When I tested mine with the Mityvac, it worked right away. Sounds like you're making progress. Good luck, Dave |
Hmmm... its a bid of a head-scratcher to be sure, but we're missing something. I'm wondering about the air flow meter - in "the shoe" as we like to call it. That disc rises and falls according to a taper machined into the walls of the shoe. Would you check the taper in the 4.5L air flow meter with that of the 4.7L air flow mater? Push the air flow meter disc down with your fingers and photograph the wall of the meter on both and please post them.
Because the 300 HP motor had larger valves, larger runners, and higher lift cams - I would think the increase in air flow would require a different air flow meter calibration. Meaning: taper and shape of the housing. Specifically near the top, where it effects idle and tip-in. I have also published before that I thought the fuel distributor for the 300 HP K-Jet was different than the 220 HP model. I have been told I was wrong on this a number of times, but still, I have been unconvinced. Back in the day :) the hot setup on your VW Rabbit with CIS was to install a build-up of tape on the inside rim of the air flow meter to narrow the bore of it at the top, above the plate. This narrowed the opening, making the velocity of the air passing through the meter faster and as a result, drawing the plate down deeper, enriching the fuel mixture. Analog stuff. Memories. |
...about my last post... I am reminded that many guys (including myself) have swapped the M28/11 cams, intake, and heads on to their M28/01 motor with no trouble or tuning issues at all. So I might be wrong to send you down the road to obscure stuff when it is more likely something simple we have overlooked.
Have you tried adjusting the control pressure via the screw I placed in the bottom of your WUR? |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15897990)
...about my last post... I am reminded that many guys (including myself) have swapped the M28/11 cams, intake, and heads on to their M28/01 motor with no trouble or tuning issues at all. So I might be wrong to send you down the road to obscure stuff when it is more likely something simple we have overlooked.
Have you tried adjusting the control pressure via the screw I placed in the bottom of your WUR? As a reminder (in response to your prior post), I have the base 4.7L engine onto which I installed my complete K-Jet fueling setup from my 4.5L as well as the cams from the 4.5L into the cam towers from the 4.7L. I don't have the L-Jet fueling setup from the 4.7L motor where I can compare the shoes. The 4.7L is not a not a Euro, just the US version with higher compression. I reused my WUR, my fuel distributor, but installed brand new Bosch injectors and new stainless fuel lines. The lines from the WUR to the Distributor are Greg Brown versions. The lines from the fuel distributor to the injectors are not his. So, going back to the fuel pressure at the WUR. The inlet pressure with the engine off and the fuel pump jumpered is 145 psi. I did not do a test where I monitored this pressure with the engine running. The outlet pressure with the mixture screw set so that AFR at idle is around 12-12.5 is what you see on the gauge in the video. With an inlet pressure of 145 psi, how should I adjust the pressure screw you referenced in the bottom of the WUR? Can the WUR be unbolted from the mount and adjusted while the engine is running or does it have to be removed, adjusted, and reinstalled to be tested? Here is a photo from inside the shoe. If you can't enlarge it far enough via Rennlist, let me know and I'll email it to you. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2da5519cea.jpg Let me know what other tests I should perform. Thanks. |
Don't do anything rash just yet... I am not sure you DO have an adjustable WUR. I am looking through your old invoices to see if you ever bought one. If you do look, the bottom of it will look like this:
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...db5a88e2f8.jpg |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15898169)
Don't do anything rash just yet... I am not sure you DO have an adjustable WUR. I am looking through your old invoices to see if you ever bought one. If you do look, the bottom of it will look like this:
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...db5a88e2f8.jpg My Build Parts Invoice shows a "Used 086 Warm up Regulator" and I remember you telling me we installed the one that had altitude compensation, which I assume is the purpose of the 2nd vacuum line port that some others don't have. Would this mean you also modified the bottom to make it adjustable? |
I can't find an invoice where I charged you for modifying your WUR, so I may have sold you the one off my K-Jet race car that already had been modified. If you can slide a small mirror under the WUR you may be able to see without removing it.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15898208)
I can't find an invoice where I charged you for modifying your WUR, so I may have sold you the one off my K-Jet race car that already had been modified. If you can slide a small mirror under the WUR you may be able to see without removing it.
|
Yep. Two bolts, that's it.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15898258)
Yep. Two bolts, that's it.
I replaced your WUR with a "086" model I had here. The WUR's that end in "086" are altitude compensating, and they have a greater range of control pressures. This makes them ideal for getting max fuel when under boost. They are just real hard to find - only installed on cars that were shipped to Northern Italy and Austria, etc. You think this one has the adjustment screw? In this same exchange, you mentioned you had been fighting a lean condition and found that to be a vacuum line routing issue. By chance do you have the vacuum line diagram that shows how things should be connected to the available ports? I took a lot of photos when I was taking thing apart and am pretty sure they're correct - also checked when Peter was here yesterday, but if you remember which one or two were the the problem, maybe I've made the same mistake. I'll try to look tonight to see if the WUR has the adjustment screw on the bottom as well. If so, back to the original question on pressure - what should the pressure be when the car is fully warmed up and how do I adjust the adjustable WUR to change the fuel pressure? Looking at the bottom of the WUR with the adjustment screw, does turning it clockwise increase or decrease the pressure? |
Had what I think may be a Eureka discovery this evening.
Earlier today I was reading some CIS information that had been shared with me by Ron Borras and one of the articles was "Playing with your K-Jetronic Warm Up Regulator, or WUR". In this article, the author (who isn't listed) states that "if your control pressure is high, you need to find out if if is due to incorrect calibration of the regulator, or a blockage in the system somewhere". Well, based on the manual, my control pressure was way high - 145 psi vs the around 90 it should be at the top of the range, so it got me thinking about blockages in the fueling system. Though I had installed a couple of Greg Brown's fuel lines, I actually don't think I was able to install the right lines in the right places and a couple of those lines had little adapters with small holes in them, and though I'm sure they were fine (since all of Greg's stuff if first rate), I decided it was time to start eliminating variables, compared to how the car used to run. Before the engine swap, it would start immediately and run perfectly with a rock solid idle, great responsiveness, good AFR numbers, etc. The fuel distributor and/or the WUR don't just go bad when being removed from one motor and installed on another, so I decided to go back to the original hard fuel lines. I was initially just going to run the 2 from the Fuel Distributor to the WUR, but decided that still leaves too many variables, so bit the bullet and started taking stuff apart again, including removal of all the fuel lines. The stainless injector lines I had installed had different end connectors for the injector side than the OEM hard lines, and I figured because of that, is why each one had a small o-ring inside. Here's a picture of the #4 line I didn't use in its original form because it sticks up off the injector and interferes with the heat exchanger for the supercharger, so for #4 I had reused my OEM hard line. (Note: Greg's version of these stainless lines have 90 degree ends, probably have the stainless sections coatedlike his others to not abrade themselves or other things they contact, and I would guess the ends can be tightened independently of the line rotating also like his others, all of which would make his much nicer than these). https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6b24875731.jpg Well I took the first couple lines off the injectors and saw this squiggly black stuff drop down onto my pristine cam towers, so the next few I was more careful about as I took them apart... Here's the Eureka moment https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3630212dd2.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8cab84de6d.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38bb5e9d1a.jpg I don't know what those o-rings were made of, but they certainly weren't fuel resistant, and essentially disintegrated and exploded in the injector inlet. In fact looking at the taper inside the fuel hose, and how that would mate with the injector, they probably didn't need to be in there at all, but each line had one. So the blockages they surely caused is why I think whenever I'd try to give the motor some fuel, the AFR gauge would go super lean and why when using the mixture screw to try and enrich it would be able to do that at idle when the demand for fuel volume was very low, but not under any load since I'm sure I had a very compromised flow through the injectors. The sad part is that these were brand new injectors and the way the o-rings disintegrated into tiny pieces, I'm sure they are now completely full of rubber debris and ruined so I'm going to have to throw them out. Tonight I moved the new tension rings and sealing washers from the new injectors over to the old injectors that I had removed when the 4.5L was running perfectly, and have now reinstalled them. I was going to reinstall the hard fuel lines, but they look crappy compared to the rest of the engine, so I decided to mask off the ends and use some high temp engine paint to freshen up the outside of them. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...88a0ac0f13.jpg I'll reinstall them on Wednesday when I return from a business trip and see where things stand. My theory is the super high fuel pressure was being caused by the fuel distributor not being able to push any fuel through the injectors which then backed up through the WUR outlet line and effected the WUR inlet line pressure as well. The surging witnessed in the video was because once the pressure built up high enough, it was able to push some fuel through the clogged injectors, but once the pressure subsided a bit, the car got no fuel and wanted to die, but just before it would, the pressure got high enough again to force more fuel in. When I tried to drive it around the neighborhood yesterday, any time I would give it any gas it would go full lean - of course it would without any fuel getting through the injectors... I'm glad I didn't make a bunch of changes to the fuel distributor or the WUR as my gut feeling is that this was the primary running issue and once the correct fuel lines are reinstalled, it will just be a matter of tuning with the mixture screw, idle screw, and timing and then I'll be back in business. Fingers crossed.... |
Good job, Pete. That sure looks promising.
Good luck, Dave |
Wow! Those O-rings have seriously turned to sh*t! Glad you found it Pete.
|
I agree with your logic, Pete. That would explain the unusually high pressures in the system and yet, running lean as well. I hope none of the little pieces of rubber are lodged in your injectors. Mechanical injectors cannot be back-flushed, just in case you are thinking about that. If memory serves, I think there is a micro-screen at the top of the injector to catch debris before it enters the barrel, That may save the day here.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15900239)
I agree with your logic, Pete. That would explain the unusually high pressures in the system and yet, running lean as well. I hope none of the little pieces of rubber are lodged in your injectors. Mechanical injectors cannot be back-flushed, just in case you are thinking about that. If memory serves, I think there is a micro-screen at the top of the injector to catch debris before it enters the barrel, That may save the day here.
|
I think there may also be inlet screens down inside the injector. Not sure if acetone would dissolve that material, but no harm in trying. Looks like you have plenty of little chunks of it to try it on in a jar.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15900341)
I think there may also be inlet screens down inside the injector. Not sure if acetone would dissolve that material, but no harm in trying. Looks like you have plenty of little chunks of it to try it on in a jar.
For the time being, I've reset the mixture screw baseline from Jim Doerr's advice - jumpering the fuel pump, enriching the mixture until it squeaks and then backing it off again until the squeaking stops. Hoping that gets me close enough to run and I'll adjust from there. My idle screw is probably out of whack now too. Is there a baseline setting or trick for that one as well? |
Lightly turn the idle speed screw in till it just closes. Then back it out 2 full turns. That should provide too high of an idle speed, but it will allow you to get it going at least. Then you will adjust from there.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15900394)
Lightly turn the idle speed screw in till it just closes. Then back it out 2 full turns. That should provide too high of an idle speed, but it will allow you to get it going at least. Then you will adjust from there.
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15899666)
Had what I think may be a Eureka discovery this evening.
Earlier today I was reading some CIS information that had been shared with me by Ron Borras and one of the articles was "Playing with your K-Jetronic Warm Up Regulator, or WUR". In this article, the author (who isn't listed) states that "if your control pressure is high, you need to find out if if is due to incorrect calibration of the regulator, or a blockage in the system somewhere". Well, based on the manual, my control pressure was way high - 145 psi vs the around 90 it should be at the top of the range, so it got me thinking about blockages in the fueling system. Though I had installed a couple of Greg Brown's fuel lines, I actually don't think I was able to install the right lines in the right places and a couple of those lines had little adapters with small holes in them, and though I'm sure they were fine (since all of Greg's stuff if first rate), I decided it was time to start eliminating variables, compared to how the car used to run. Before the engine swap, it would start immediately and run perfectly with a rock solid idle, great responsiveness, good AFR numbers, etc. The fuel distributor and/or the WUR don't just go bad when being removed from one motor and installed on another, so I decided to go back to the original hard fuel lines. I was initially just going to run the 2 from the Fuel Distributor to the WUR, but decided that still leaves too many variables, so bit the bullet and started taking stuff apart again, including removal of all the fuel lines. The stainless injector lines I had installed had different end connectors for the injector side than the OEM hard lines, and I figured because of that, is why each one had a small o-ring inside. Here's a picture of the #4 line I didn't use in its original form because it sticks up off the injector and interferes with the heat exchanger for the supercharger, so for #4 I had reused my OEM hard line. (Note: Greg's version of these stainless lines have 90 degree ends, probably have the stainless sections coatedlike his others to not abrade themselves or other things they contact, and I would guess the ends can be tightened independently of the line rotating also like his others, all of which would make his much nicer than these). https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6b24875731.jpg Well I took the first couple lines off the injectors and saw this squiggly black stuff drop down onto my pristine cam towers, so the next few I was more careful about as I took them apart... Here's the Eureka moment https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3630212dd2.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8cab84de6d.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38bb5e9d1a.jpg I don't know what those o-rings were made of, but they certainly weren't fuel resistant, and essentially disintegrated and exploded in the injector inlet. In fact looking at the taper inside the fuel hose, and how that would mate with the injector, they probably didn't need to be in there at all, but each line had one. So the blockages they surely caused is why I think whenever I'd try to give the motor some fuel, the AFR gauge would go super lean and why when using the mixture screw to try and enrich it would be able to do that at idle when the demand for fuel volume was very low, but not under any load since I'm sure I had a very compromised flow through the injectors. The sad part is that these were brand new injectors and the way the o-rings disintegrated into tiny pieces, I'm sure they are now completely full of rubber debris and ruined so I'm going to have to throw them out. Tonight I moved the new tension rings and sealing washers from the new injectors over to the old injectors that I had removed when the 4.5L was running perfectly, and have now reinstalled them. I was going to reinstall the hard fuel lines, but they look crappy compared to the rest of the engine, so I decided to mask off the ends and use some high temp engine paint to freshen up the outside of them. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...88a0ac0f13.jpg I'll reinstall them on Wednesday when I return from a business trip and see where things stand. My theory is the super high fuel pressure was being caused by the fuel distributor not being able to push any fuel through the injectors which then backed up through the WUR outlet line and effected the WUR inlet line pressure as well. The surging witnessed in the video was because once the pressure built up high enough, it was able to push some fuel through the clogged injectors, but once the pressure subsided a bit, the car got no fuel and wanted to die, but just before it would, the pressure got high enough again to force more fuel in. When I tried to drive it around the neighborhood yesterday, any time I would give it any gas it would go full lean - of course it would without any fuel getting through the injectors... I'm glad I didn't make a bunch of changes to the fuel distributor or the WUR as my gut feeling is that this was the primary running issue and once the correct fuel lines are reinstalled, it will just be a matter of tuning with the mixture screw, idle screw, and timing and then I'll be back in business. Fingers crossed.... Where did those lines with the rubber inside come from? |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15900259)
Someone said acetone may dissolve the rubber bits. The little filter screens are in the outlets of the FD, not the inlets of the injectors. I'm going to take them to a diesel performance shop and see what they say.
|
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15901757)
Just to be clear....none of my injector, fuel distributor, or cold start lines have any rubber inside.
Where did those lines with the rubber inside come from? The lines that run from the fuel distributor to the individual injectors that had the rubber o-rings that disintegrated were NOT your lines and were sourced from another member who was going to use them with a new fuel rail setup on an L-Jet car, but we thought they'd work for my K-Jet setup too. He had never installed them. Your injector lines are much better for at least 3 reasons:
Roger is checking current pricing for me on the set he has on-hand in case I decide to reconnect the 2 WUR to FD LINES, figure out how to install the 3rd line, and add the injector lines, but for right now I'm going to run the car with the old injectors that came out and the OEM hard lines to get it tuned and running like it was before without additional variables. I'm going to see if someone can clean the injectors of the rubber that's in them by dissolving it by passing a chemical through it. If not, I'll just use my old injectors or purchase another set if necessary. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15901993)
Correct, I thought I was clear in saying the "non Greg Brown" lines. I have 3 of your lines and installed 2 of them - the ones from the WUR to the Fuel Distributor, but couldn't maje the 3rd line work, which I think was for the cold start valve - I think you were going to email me some directions (petza914@gmail.com).
The lines that run from the fuel distributor to the individual injectors that had the rubber o-rings that disintegrated were NOT your lines and were sourced from another member who was going to use them with a new fuel rail setup on an L-Jet car, but we thought they'd work for my K-Jet setup too. He had never installed them. Your injector lines are much better for at least 3 reasons:
Roger is checking current pricing for me on the set he has on-hand in case I decide to reconnect the 2 WUR to FD LINES, figure out how to install the 3rd line, and add the injector lines, but for right now I'm going to run the car with the old injectors that came out and the OEM hard lines to get it tuned and running like it was before without additional variables. I'm going to see if someone can clean the injectors of the rubber that's in them by dissolving it by passing a chemical through it. If not, I'll just use my old injectors or purchase another set if necessary. You suppose that rubber was plugs that were there to keep the lines clean? |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15902198)
That's a boatload of rubber...seems like way more than what would come from an O-ring.
You suppose that rubber was plugs that were there to keep the lines clean? At this point, those lines aren't going back on. I'll either run a set of your SS lines with the correct 90 degree ends and fittings or the OEM hard lines. I'm going to get the car running with the OEM lines first. |
They were the lines sold here: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...iders-etc.html
|
Reinstalled all the (freshly painted) OEM fuel lines this evening, but it was too late to start the car to see if that was the issue. Maybe tomorrow, but have a bunch of people coming to stay for the weekend starting in the morning so might not get to run it and start tuning until Sunday afternoon.
They actually make the engine bay look neater and work better with the intercooler (currently not installed but the fluid hoses are coupled so as not to make a mess) as they're lower and flatter where the intercooler sits in the back on the passenger side. May just stick with them although I left the 2 GB lines from the WUR to the FD installed as routed, just disconnected the ends, in case I want to go back to those 2. I jimpered the fuel pump and ran it for about 1 minute to check for leaks at the injectors, FD, and WUR. Didn't see any but will check again when it's running. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0b67b3c829.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e65ee4de77.jpg |
Not the Father's Day I was hoping for.
Started the car today with the original injectors and OEM fuel lines installed, expecting to be able to fine tune mixture, timing, idle etc and no luck. Runs exactly like it did with the clogged up fuel line ends and injectors. I can get it to idle reasonably stable, but as soon as I give it any gas (even without any load on the motor) it goes full lean to an 18 AFR and won't rev past 2,000 rpm. If I make the mixture screw way rich to where I can keep the AFR at 13 or below at 3000 rpm, the AFR at idle is like a 10 or richer and I can see the richness coming out the exhaust. What's weird is disconnecting any of the electrical plugs (WUR, cold start injector, air control valve) seems to have no effect on the way the engine is running so I thought maybe I had an electrical issue. I cleaned the contacts and pins in the 14 pin connector and no difference. I jumpered the fuel pump and no difference. Tried spraying some ether around everything looking for an increase in RPMs from a vacuum leak, but didn't detect any. Replaced my braided stainless vacuum lines with tighter fitting silicone ones and no difference there either. Getting pretty frustrated with it and about ready to cancel my Rendezvous reservations, put it up on the lift in storage for the next few months to enjoy the rest of my summer while the kids are off from school, unless someone has some additional ideas on what to try. :banghead: |
So sorry to hear this Pete. We spent TOO much time today trying to get the 1990 928 running so we could bring two to Rendezvous. I'd honestly suggest you trailer the car and get the experts on hand to at least help with diagnosing it. If it doesn't improve, you'll have feedback and can tackle it in the Fall.
I did a top-end refresh on my 1990 and now I have half the cylinders getting spark, etc..., etc... It is maddening but you've got a pretty unique opportunity to get several qualified eyes on your car. Just food for thought! |
Sorry Pete.
I don't know much about K-jet injection, but it sounds like your pressure at idle was too high (rich), and at part throttle it is too low (lean). Pressure partially determines amount of fuel delivered, since the injectors flow continuously. Is it possible that some component in the pressure regulator is stuck? I don't know if that's even a reasonable question, but it sounds like something is working opposite to design, or not at all. As I read the WSM and my Fuel Injection book by Probst, the fuel pressure regulator is a part of the fuel distributor body, and depends on a spring activated valve which returns fuel to the tank depending on pressure. Good luck, Dave |
I'm going to get the gauges back out and see what my inlet pressure from the distributor to the WUR and the outlet pressure from the WUR back to the fuel distributor are now that I've eliminated the line blockages from all the rubber o-ring. I'm also going to try and smoke test the intake to make sure there isn't a vacuum leak somewhere. I'll try that with just the smoke machine pressure and if it doesn't show anything, will fill all the intake plumbing with smoke and then let the supercharger force feed it to see if that makes a difference.
|
How large a vacuum leak would I need to have it be the cause of some of the issues I'm having.
With my smoke machine... https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a6059aea32.jpg I found 2 today... 1 was a cracked small hose on a nipple very close to the primary vacuum booster. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2d6a573a98.jpg The second was at the mixture screw. When the supercharger is connected with all the plumbing, it's very difficult to access the mixture screw because you have to get a tool under the custom piece that is the path for the forced air into the metering plate. I removed the spring from my mixture screw or make this adjustment easier and didn't realize until this morning that the spring actually seals the opening with an o-ring at the base of the mixture post when adjustments aren't being made. I'll get an appropriate spring today to reinstall and have put on a fresh o-ring as well. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...583fba683a.jpg Both of these seam like fairly minor leaks, though I did get pretty good smoke plumes out of them. Is any leak a major issue or does it have to be a major leak to be a major issue? The other thought I had is whether it's possible that this engine is creating so much vacuum that it's pulling open the supercharger blow off valve and creating an intake leak at the connection nipple on the front of the spider body. This connection is where the hard line for the boost/vac gauge is connected and where the line to the blow off valve is connected. I'll block off the line to the BOV next time I run it to see if there's any difference. |
The leak at the brake booster would be a bad one, but that weeping at the mixture screw on the CIS show is pretty insignificant. Fix it if you can, but don't worry too much about that one.
You are still trying to get it running right NA, right? Don't even bother to hook up the supercharger until it runs right non supercharged. When you press the paddle down in the CIS air flow meter, it descends nicely with equal pressure, no sticky spots, right? Just checking that the piston in the fuekl distributor moves freely and smoothly, in case it picked up a piece of dirt during the transfer... |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15912715)
The leak at the brake booster would be a bad one, but that weeping at the mixture screw on the CIS show is pretty insignificant. Fix it if you can, but don't worry too much about that one.
You are still trying to get it running right NA, right? Don't even bother to hook up the supercharger until it runs right non supercharged. When you press the paddle down in the CIS air flow meter, it descends nicely with equal pressure, no sticky spots, right? Just checking that the piston in the fuekl distributor moves freely and smoothly, in case it picked up a piece of dirt during the transfer... I'm going to hook the gauges back up before the next cold start. Will it be more telling to see the pressure going into the WUR or out of the WUR as the car warms up? Last time I measured pressure into the WUR, I did it with the engine off and the fuel pump jumpered. Is that the proper way or should I monitor it while the car is running to see if it fluctuates. I only have one guage set so will have to do the two tests separately, which is why I ask which is the better one to have hooked up for cold start. Thanks. |
Which heads are on them Motor? The used 4.7 heads, right? If there is an intake valve not sealing against its seat correctly, it can cause a reversion into the plenum that can drive a K-Jet nuts. To diagnose this, compression check the motor. Be sure to hook up a battery charger during the compression check. All cylinders should be within 10% of each other. If there is a low one or two, then switch to a cylinder leak-down test on those cylinders. Look for a possible intake valve leak.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15912790)
Which heads are on them Motor? The used 4.7 heads, right? If there is an intake valve not sealing against its seat correctly, it can cause a reversion into the plenum that can drive a K-Jet nuts. To diagnose this, compression check the motor. Be sure to hook up a battery charger during the compression check. All cylinders should be within 10% of each other. If there is a low one or two, then switch to a cylinder leak-down test on those cylinders. Look for a possible intake valve leak.
Compression test - coil wire disconnected, fuel pump relay out, correct? Throttle plate open or closed? |
Throttle open. As to the vaccum gauge, an intake vale that is not seating would make the needle jump. It can be very fast.
|
Rebuilt the mixture screw with a new spring, new o-rings and uses some sealant on the old gasket when reinstalling.
Both vacuum leaks now repaired and I redid the smoke test. Now, no smoke being emitted from anywhere with the throttle plate open or closed. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3cafadfedd.jpg Need to know which side of the WUR to monitor for tonight's cold start running test. |
Nothing seems to make a difference.
Here's the car running after cold start. You can see as the motor warms up, the fuel pressure starts decreasing, which I think is what it's supposed to do with the WUR, but why is the pressure so high to start with - it's pinning the gauge beyond 145 psi and why does it then spike and fall and spike and fall? Here's 2 more - one monitoring the same line at the WUR after its warmed up and the other monitoring the other line at the WUR Took out the pressure valve from the FD. Looks pristine. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6e9ad4c1a7.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ee5aaf4647.jpg Took out the WUR while I was disconnecting fuel lines too. Looks like it does not have an adjustment screw unless it's under that cap on the bottom. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...af19cf99b8.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f21d56dcd0.jpg Do I need a new Fuel Distributor, a Fuel Pressure Regulator, a WUR, etc? |
Originally Posted by Petza914
Correct, the heads from the 4.7 with the cam towers from the 4.7, but the cams from the 4.5. Heads were rebuilt by Greg Brown (I believe) for the previous owner (Josh - ladybug83). If I was getting reversion pressure through an intake valve that wasn't closed, would I be able to detect this on the boost/vac gauge as a brief change from vac to less vac or does it happen too fast to be visible on a gauges?
Compression test - coil wire disconnected, fuel pump relay out, correct? Throttle plate open or closed? I'm just now realizing (after reading backwards through your thread) that this is the motor from the ladybug car. The heads were rebuilt by Engine Supply in Costa Mesa, Ca. There may be compression numbers posted in the Ladybug thread prior to me parting out the car and selling the engine, or maybe in the engine/trans for sale thread, but I don't know how relevant they are now. Probably best to re-check I suppose. I guess sitting for a few years, valves could've gotten sticky (assuming here that brenden didn't run the motor while he owned it). I'm hoping that's a good motor for you , I put about 1,100 good miles on it prior to removal. There was coolant seeping at the water bridge when I first rebuilt it, but I believe I removed and resealed it with driebond. Also a couple time-serts where things got sideways on me, one of the water bridge bolts, and one of the alternator bolts. |
Also, not sure if this is helpful but, I think the distributor on that motor ('83) only had one vacuum line, if the distributor your using has two vacuum ports, could that be related to the issue your experiencing?
|
|
Josh,
Thanks for the info. It will be good to compare those compression #s to new ones I take in a couple days. Brendan told me about the welded head and the time-sert repairs so no surprises there and the motor was really clean with every fastener marked with red pen to know it was torqued properly. You did nice work on it during your build. I redid the oil pump, oil pan, cam towers, cam gears, tensioner, water bridge, etc (well, you've seen the thread) The only place I have a leak is at the oil pan drain plug and everything else is perfectly dry. The drain plug one will be rectified at the first oil change which won't be long after I get it running as I have Break In oil in it currently to help dissolve the assembly lube I used.. Brendan had also linked me to that thread with the videos of the engine running, so I actually have high-confidence that the engine is good and I just need to figure out what's going on with the fueling, which worked perfectly on my 4.5L and should do the same on your old motor, but for some reason isn't. My 4.5L had a single vacuum distributor too but that's not the issue as the retard port is common to both (on the top side when there's only 1 port and on the back side when there are 2) and I can make the timing advance or retard by applying vacuum to the appropriate port. I've also run it with only the retard line connected and the advance line blocked off and no difference other than that the timing changes as you'd expect. |
I have always disliked CIS. That does not matter to this thread as much as the thought that really, there are several things that need to happy for the motor to get enough fuel at the right time, but it would seem that something is modifying the fuel rate independent of another set of parameters that are happening without a loop back to the fuel rate.
|
Isn't this replacing parts time? You have replaced everything else. What about replacing whatever WUR is in there. I know Mark has some. The 79 I gave him had a good one on there. Isn't the WUR like the brain of the whole thing?
I hate CIS. Give me a cheap ECU any day. |
I am concerned about all that fuel washing down the cylinder walls.
|
Hi Pete,
There are some real K-jet experts here, and I am the opposite. Please listen to them, as I know you will. I would need to have confidence in the basics of hooking up the gauge set, then knowing what the pressure readings indicate. I am not certain exactly what pressure you are reading; control pressure or system pressure. People who tune these systems all the time could probably narrow down your search. I agree that your problem is probably somewhere in the fueling system, and although it ran fine before, something has knocked it off its game. I wonder if there are rubber fragments anywhere else? Good luck, Dave |
The videos I posted earlier are reading pressures in one on the input supply line and in the other the return line. The one on the output of the WUR shows the pressure gradually decreasing as the temperature increases so that kind of seems to be working.
If I have to replace the WUR, I may go with one of the electronically mappable ones, like that from Unwired Tools. Seems like the FD might be the problem though. I don't think there's much of a fuel wash problem since the engine is going lean most of the time and not rich, no? I'm now wondering if I somehow I mislabeled the 4 virtually identical electrical plugs - WUR, air control valve, cold start injector, and what looks like a coolant temp sensor since unplugging them doesn't seem to have much of an effect. Can anyone confirm which goes where. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dbc29afab9.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...083874ed38.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...add91e2a9a.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4e041c394a.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9ebcd9f72d.jpg |
Could someone explain to me how the air metering plate and fuel distributor work together to control the amount of fuel being sent to the injectors relative to the amount of air coming in through the plate.
Is it difficult to rebuild a fuel distributor properly and what kits have people had success with? Anyone have a New or Remanufactured fuel distributor they want to sell that they won't need any longer but haven't gotten around to selling yet? |
Hi Pete,
Get the Bosch fuel injection book by C. Probst. The mechanism is ingenious. Good luck, Dave |
Pete --
(edit: I was typing at the same time Dave was.) The pancake plate moves based on air flowing through to the engine intake. The lever that the plate connects to has an adjustment screw that changes the relationship between the plate and lever slightly. This is the idle mixture screw. Know that it makes a measurable difference at idle and low speeds, but has virtually no effect on mixture past about 25% load (horsepower) on the engine. Control pressure, managed by the WUR, is king of mixture control under load. There are (were) little brass screens in the ports to limit the size of crud that might move around the system. Absent fuel and in the presence of air, the brass deteriorates. That's main reason we hear that CIS cars need to be driven regularly. Folks are about the habit of taking those screens out when they start corroding to the point of restricting fuel flow. They really need to be in there. I used to keep a supply of spares when I had CIS cars, but three moves and thirty years since, the parts are long gone. Carl may have guidance to share on a proper WUR for the supercharged car. There are certain WUR versions specified for "high altitude" service, where atmospheric pressure is used to actively bias the control pressure up when it detects low ambient pressure (higher altitude). That effectively leans out the mixture to compensate for the less dense air coming in. The metering unit is, after all, volumetric rather than mass flow sensing. Rebuilding the fuel metering unit ("distributor") isn't difficult, but like many things it needs some serious care. The springs and pistons are carefully matched, so they need to be carefully captured and their original positions in the body preserved. The head is sealed to the body with a gasket that was originally installed with no sealant. I used to test the head for flat with a sheet of 800 wet-or-dry floating in oil in a granite surface plate. Many used a piece of glass for this. Installing the head is an exercise in progressive torque tightening of the screws, so the head stays flat as the screws are tightened. Like a cylinder head but minus the soft gasket. If the head or body sealing surface is damaged at all (prying the head off with a screwdriver is enough), it needs to be repaired flat again. Some use Indian Head Shellac gasket sealer to manage fuel seepage when the parts or technique are less than perfect. There are certainly some YouTube videos showing a lot of this. There are also some very good books that teach the theory of operation plus some service and component building techniques. I think the go-to is the Randy Probst book if you can find one. The WUR is somewhat specific to the application. It modulates control pressure based on coolant temperature, plus it has an electric heating element that leans out the mixture as the engine is warming up. The temperature vs pressure curve is important. You can build a test fixture to verify this function, and there are MINOR but DANGEROUS adjustments you can make to the bimetallic strip and spring that actually manage the pressure. Sounds like you have the gauges already, so you are well on your way. The pressure/temperature curves in the WSM are good. Dinking with the WUR thermo spring is not recommended for amateurs, as very tiny changes have a big effect on pressure and mixture. |
And... Wire conductor colors and your WSM wiring diagrams will help you determine which connector goes to which switch or sensor.
|
Thanks dr bob.
So, do we think my high pressure and rhythmic mixture and running fluctuations or issues are being caused by a bad WUR, a bad FD, or both? I was trying to understand how the system works in theory to try and determine what to buy to try next as I'm about out of ideas. Even if the pressure coming into the WUR were high, as long as I could knock it down to the right range, the engine then wouldn't care, right? This makes me think that the WUR is the place to start. I have the filter screens in my FD and during the last fuel line change removed them and cleaned them out. They weren't gunked up and you can see from the picture of the FD pressure screw that it doesn't look like there's much junk in there. That screw came out spotless and the photo I posted is how it looked upon removal - I didn't wipe it or spray it with anything to make it look like that. |
I'm still stuck on how a running engine with a known good WUR and FD, those parts removed and then put back on, that they would suddenly become defective. Not impossible, true, but improbable.
About your connectors, the Aux air valve and the WUR get 12v power all the time, the connector has one Pos and on Neg. If you had inadvertently connected one of these to the cold start injector, you'd be firing the cold start injector constantly and the result would be a constant rich condition. The 4th AMP connector is a water temp sensor. I dont think this is the issue, but you could start the motor and while its running, disconnect all 4 of the connectors and see if it makes any difference in the tune. At the FD, there is a filter screen sometimes at the OUTLET line of the FD that connects to the WUR on the other end. Make sure this is not blocked, or the line from FD to WUR kinked or plugged. That would cause your Very High system pressures. |
For what its worth, I like K-Jetronic. Its brilliant and an absolute anvil once its set up. Just feed it fresh fuel and its happy. It Achilles heal is old gas and varnish. We topped out at 460 WHP/541 BHP on our 16v K-jet race car before we changed to race a 32v motor instead. It ran well for us, although in my video for Pikes Peak you can hear the fuel/air ratio was all wrong in the last few turns at 14,000 feet. But then, every fuel delivery system had that issue then.
Looking at the record - no other Fuel Injection system spanned as many years as K-Jet, and through many Government regs and changes. And remember that in the case of the 1989 Porsche 911 Turbo (the 930) - the car that Porsche used to get back the moniker of "worlds fastest production car" from Ferrari - they chose K-Jet. Think about that. The year was 1988/89, and Porsche certainly had access to the Bosch LH-Jetronic system, but they opted for K-Jetronic for their Ferrari beater. I like it. Wasn't that a 930 in the movie Bad Boys II? Worlds fastest production car. A K-Jet was in that car. :) |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15915312)
I'm still stuck on how a running engine with a known good WUR and FD, those parts removed and then put back on, that they would suddenly become defective. Not impossible, true, but improbable.
About your connectors, the Aux air valve and the WUR get 12v power all the time, the connector has one Pos and on Neg. If you had inadvertently connected one of these to the cold start injector, you'd be firing the cold start injector constantly and the result would be a constant rich condition. The 4th AMP connector is a water tekp sensor. I dont think this is the issue, but you could start the motor and while its running, disconnect all 4 of the connectors and see if it makes any difference in the tune. At the FD, there is a filter screen sometimes at the OUTLET line of the FD that connects to the WUR on the other end. Make sure this is not blocked, or the line from FD to WUR kinked or plugged. That would cause your Very High system pressures. I think I may have had the coolant sensor and the cold start injector plugs reversed as you say. I had a texting round table last night with the Carolina 928s guys (Peter, Scott, Ron, Seth, Chris, etc) and we started looking at that. Two of those plugs have the same wire colors and I'm assuming and believe these are the 12v and ground ones you mention that go to the Air Control valve and the WUR. They are different lengths and I don't think the plug that goes to the air control valve will reach any of the other plugs. Do they get 12v with the key on or only when the engine is running and where do they get their voltage from (the 14 pin connector and that harness)? One of the two remaining plugs has 3 wires going into the plug even though it only has two contacts and it was decided last night that this one is the one for the cold start injector. Can you confirm this is correct? The other (yellow and brown 2 wire) is for the thermo sensor and from my pictures with the colored wire ties on each plug, it looks like I may have somehow labeled / wire tied these incorrectly where I had the 3 wire plug on the thermo switch and the other on the cold start injector. I was trying different combinations of the plugs on the devices last night and with one combination, the car would fire up then die immediately. Further inspection revealed that my fuse pump fuse was blown so one of the combinations I tried must have shorted that circuit and blew the fuse. Replacing the fuse had the car fire up quickly like it always had before, but it was totally lean and then died and I was unable to get it to restart. So I think we may be onto something. If the cold start injector was running all the time and I was adjusting the mixture screw leaner to compensate for this extra fuel that would explain why once I moved the connectors that the car started properly but was full lean immediately. It would also explain why the mixture screw was so out of whack that at idle it was rich, but with any pedal or load would go full lean as I don't think the surplus fuel from the cold start injector is enough to handle that much plate movement. The last thing I did last night was to rebaseline the mixture screw going fully CCW then with the fuel pump jumpered going CW until the injectors squealed and then CCW again about a half turn. Also closed the idle screw CW all the way and then CCW 2 turns. By the time I had made all three changes I think I had flooded the motor and it was too late to run it again in the garage anyway. I'm now out of town until tomorrow evening but will get back into it then. I will also check the screens in the FD positions for the lines that run to and from the WUR to see if that's the cause of my pressure issue. I've tried both the OEM lines from the WUR to the FD and Greg Browns lines without any difference so I'm confident it's not a line issue but could be a filter screen issue to the line. Thanks to everyone for sticking with me through this. |
So I think we may be onto something. If the cold start injector was running all the time and I was adjusting the mixture screw leaner to compensate for this extra fuel that would explain why once I moved the connectors that the car started properly but was full lean immediately. The cold start injector receives its power from the starter solinoid when cranking. When you stop cranking, the power to the CS Injector is meant to be shut off. To test that you have the right connector to the cold start injector, use the voltmeter to find that it only has power during cranking. The 2-wire connector with three wires going to it sounds right, as one of the ground wires also runs to the lower water temp sensor, I believe to prevent the CS injector from firing when the motor is already warm. |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15915506)
Sounds like it. Using a common voltmeter, the connectors for the Aux air valve and the WUR will have 12v when the ignition is in the ON or RUN position and that power will stay on as long as the key is in that position.
The cold start injector receives its power from the starter solinoid when cranking. When you stop cranking, the power to the CS Injector is meant to be shut off. To test that you have the right connector to the cold start injector, use the voltmeter to find that it only has power during cranking. The 2-wire connector with three wires going to it sounds right, as one of the ground wires also runs to the lower water temp sensor, I bevel to prevent the CS injector from firing when the motor is already warm. I'll be really mad at myself if I've spent all this time chasing major mechanical issues and it turns out that I had 2 plugs reversed. :banghead: |
Don't be too hard on your self, you have done a great job.
|
I found a very good YouTube video that explains the theory and operation of CIS mechanical fuel injection -
So, in looking at my pressure valve in the back of the fuel distributor that controls the system pressure to the WUR and in the lower chambers of the fuel distributor and comparing that to one I see for sale on eBay, they are the same, except mine looks to have an additional beefed up spring outside the normal thin spring. Is this why my fuel pressure readings are so high or is this additional larger spring normally present and just not part of the ebay item. It almost looks like someone increased the fuel pressure from the FD to the WUR to try and compensate for an issue they may have been having with the car at some point. Below is a picture from the eBay item that's for sale https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3FQAA...wxD/s-l500.jpg and here are the pictures of the one I removed from my FD yesterday. One picture shows it with both springs installed and the other with only the one spring, which then makes it look like the eBay item. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1653860502.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...90accc9ed2.jpg That second spring is a serious one compared to the normal one and would certainly explain my super high fuel pressure if it's not supposed to be there. Should I take this pressure adjuster screw back out and try it with the extra spring removed? My problem is that I don't know what my fuel pressure was when my 4.5L car was running well as I never needed to check it - because it had been running well. It may have been way to high all along and just never caused an issue, so I don't know why it would now. Carl says that he didn't do anything to modify the fuel pressure to the WUR as part of the supercharger installation, since everything seemed to work the way it was - he changed the WUR, but didn't do anything in the FD. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15916989)
I found a very good YouTube video that explains the theory and operation of CIS mechanical fuel injection - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=a4fJAfXYxWk
So, in looking at my pressure valve in the back of the fuel distributor that controls the system pressure to the WUR and in the lower chambers of the fuel distributor and comparing that to one I see for sale on eBay, they are the same, except mine looks to have an additional beefed up spring outside the normal thin spring. Is this why my fuel pressure readings are so high or is this additional larger spring normally present and just not part of the ebay item. It almost looks like someone increased the fuel pressure from the FD to the WUR to try and compensate for an issue they may have been having with the car at some point. Below is a picture from the eBay item that's for sale https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3FQAA...wxD/s-l500.jpg and here are the pictures of the one I removed from my FD yesterday. One picture shows it with both springs installed and the other with only the one spring, which then makes it look like the eBay item. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1653860502.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...90accc9ed2.jpg That second spring is a serious one compared to the normal one and would certainly explain my super high fuel pressure if it's not supposed to be there. Should I take this pressure adjuster screw back out and try it with the extra spring removed? My problem is that I don't know what my fuel pressure was when my 4.5L car was running well as I never needed to check it - because it had been running well. It may have been way to high all along and just never caused an issue, so I don't know why it would now. Carl says that he didn't do anything to modify the fuel pressure to the WUR as part of the supercharger installation, since everything seemed to work the way it was - he changed the WUR, but didn't do anything in the FD. You should probably make the effort to remove and inspect that piston. There's a small "O-ring" on that piston that seals it against the orifice that bypasses the fuel pressure, BTW. If the "O-ring" goes bad, fuel pressure will be incorrect. BTW...your "plunger" assembly is correct. There's not an "extra" spring there. Fuel pressure is determined by the "shim" at the base of the big spring. Those "shims" come in various thicknesses, so you can set the system pressure correctly. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15917069)
I've been trying to stay out of this entire discussion, but it might be worth mentioning that there's another piston inside the fuel distributor, which the assembly in you fingers pushes on. It's that piston which actually moves and controls the fuel pressure. If there was a little bit of moisture somewhere, when you removed the fuel distributor, that piston could be frozen in the bore.
You should probably make the effort to remove and inspect that piston. There's a small "O-ring" on that piston that seals it against the orifice that bypasses the fuel pressure, BTW. If the "O-ring" goes bad, fuel pressure will be incorrect. BTW...your "plunger" assembly is correct. There's not an "extra" spring there. Fuel pressure is determined by the "shim" at the base of the big spring. Those "shims" come in various thicknesses, so you can set the system pressure correctly. Good to know that big spring slipped over the top is correct. Thanks. How do I get to that internal piston you're speaking of. Obviously I need to remove all the fuel line connections, but then how does the FD come off and how much of it needs to come apart to get to it? Any chance spraying some light penetrating oil into the hole where the pressure screw is and the injector outlets or introducing some Marvel Mystery Oil might free things up without major disassembly? |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15915345)
For what its worth, I like K-Jetronic. Its brilliant and an absolute anvil once its set up. Just feed it fresh fuel and its happy. It Achilles heal is old gas and varnish. We topped out at 460 WHP/541 BHP on our 16v K-jet race car before we changed to race a 32v motor instead. It ran well for us, although in my video for Pikes Peak you can hear the fuel/air ratio was all wrong in the last few turns at 14,000 feet. But then, every fuel delivery system had that issue then.
Looking at the record - no other Fuel Injection system spanned as many years as K-Jet, and through many Government regs and changes. And remember that in the case of the 1989 Porsche 911 Turbo (the 930) - the car that Porsche used to get back the moniker of "worlds fastest production car" from Ferrari - they chose K-Jet. Think about that. The year was 1988/89, and Porsche certainly had access to the Bosch LH-Jetronic system, but they opted for K-Jetronic for their Ferrari beater. I like it. Wasn't that a 930 in the movie Bad Boys II? Worlds fastest production car. A K-Jet was in that car. :) There's your 911 trivia for tonight :) |
Bosch Porsche service manual for K-Jetronic through 1979
http://www.type17.ch/downloads/Injec...p%20Manual.pdf System pressure of 145psi is ridiculously high, it should be somewhere around 75psi, see pages 35 and 45 |
|
reanimotion,
Thanks - great resources to have. |
I like Greg's idea of the sticking internal valve piston. And thank you for the 911 lesson. What I know about 911's would fit in a thimble. :)
|
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15917099)
Glad to have you back in - "Every time I try to get out, they pull me back in"
Good to know that big spring slipped over the top is correct. Thanks. How do I get to that internal piston you're speaking of. Obviously I need to remove all the fuel line connections, but then how does the FD come off and how much of it needs to come apart to get to it? Any chance spraying some light penetrating oil into the hole where the pressure screw is and the injector outlets or introducing some Marvel Mystery Oil might free things up without major disassembly? Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15918034)
Maybe stupid, but I wonder if you can remove that piston by applying suction with your Mityvac. MMO probably wouldn't hurt either.
Good luck, Dave |
I bet some water or cleaning fluid got into the FD while it was off and I was cleaning things before reinstallation. I'm going to pursue this plunger inside the FD to see if I can get it lubricated and moving to get the baseline fuel pressure back into the range. Between that and the potentially switched connectors on the cold start valve and thermo switch, maybe we're closer than we think to getting this resolved.
As I go through removal and further testing of the FD, it would help me a lot if someone could look at the photo of the FD and WUR below, where I've labelled the inputs and outputs with letters and numbers (they're faint but there if you look closely) to let me know which are which for the 928 K-Jet I have, as different CIS systems I've seen seem to have them labelled differently, even on L-Jet. FD A - connected to WUR B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank D - connected to WUR WUR 1 - connected to FD 2 - connected to FD On my car, the D line on the FD went to the 1 on the WUR and the A line on the FD went to the 2 on the WUR, so they cross over from one side to the other. Is that correct as I've seen a drawing someone did of their system that shows them not crossing sides. Is 1 or 2 on the WUR the input where the system pressure should be stable and which is the output back to the FD where the pressure should be changing based on temperature. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...27e4ba586a.jpg Once I remove the FD so I can see what's going on, is there a good way to try and lubricate and free that pressure plunger without disassembling it, like with compressed air (which port should I blow in from) or with the Mityvac supplying vacuum as Dave suggested might work? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 15918198)
I bet some water or cleaning fluid got into the FD while it was off and I was cleaning things before reinstallation. I'm going to pursue this plunger inside the FD to see if I can get it lubricated and moving to get the baseline fuel pressure back into the range. Between that and the potentially switched connectors on the cold start valve and thermo switch, maybe we're closer than we think to getting this resolved.
As I go through removal and further testing of the FD, it would help me a lot if someone could look at the photo of the FD and WUR below, where I've labelled the inputs and outputs with letters and numbers (they're faint but there if you look closely) to let me know which are which for the 928 K-Jet I have, as different CIS systems I've seen seem to have them labelled differently, even on L-Jet. FD A - connected to WUR B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank D - connected to WUR WUR 1 - connected to FD 2 - connected to FD On my car, the D line on the FD went to the 1 on the WUR and the A line on the FD went to the 2 on the WUR, so they cross over from one side to the other. Is that correct as I've seen a drawing someone did of their system that shows them not crossing sides. Is 1 or 2 on the WUR the input where the system pressure should be stable and which is the output back to the FD where the pressure should be changing based on temperature. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...27e4ba586a.jpg Once I remove the FD so I can see what's going on, is there a good way to try and lubricate and free that pressure plunger without disassembling it, like with compressed air (which port should I blow in from) or with the Mityvac supplying vacuum as Dave suggested might work? Thanks. Since this piston regulates incoming fuel pressure, if you remove the incoming fuel pressure line and blow with compressed air into the fuel distributor, that piston should "leave a dent", in your firewall If the piston is stuck/frozen and will not move, that will be your system fuel pressure issue. |
There's one other thing to check. If you replaced the fuel deed and return hoses on the passenger side of the engine bay, it us possible to "swap" the two hoses, if you are not paying attention. This generally results is a very "ballooned" fuel filter, which crabs the weld and leaks fuel (from "dead headed" fuel pressure.)
However, if the filter doesn't break the weld and leak, feeding fuel pressure backwards through the system would do some really crazy things! The quick way to check this is to simply look at the fuel filter....of it looks like a "pregnant" filter, you've swapped the two lines. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15918292)
The internal residual fuel pressure frequently forces the piston out of the fuel distributor. The pistons sre known to come out and drop down (getting lost) while people are looking at the spring assembly. If you can't just stick in a small "stick magnet" and pull out the plunger, it's not a good thing.
Since this piston regulates incoming fuel pressure, if you remove the incoming fuel pressure line and blow with compressed air into the fuel distributor, that piston should "leave a dent", in your firewall If the piston is stuck/frozen and will not move, that will be your system fuel pressure issue. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by GregBBRD
(Post 15918312)
There's one other thing to check. If you replaced the fuel deed and return hoses on the passenger side of the engine bay, it us possible to "swap" the two hoses, if you are not paying attention. This generally results is a very "ballooned" fuel filter, which crabs the weld and leaks fuel (from "dead headed" fuel pressure.)
However, if the filter doesn't break the weld and leak, feeding fuel pressure backwards through the system would do some really crazy things! The quick way to check this is to simply look at the fuel filter....of it looks like a "pregnant" filter, you've swapped the two lines. Here they are on the old motor color coded before removal. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...514b4db84f.jpg and here's the K-Jet system after removal where you can see the end connectors being different from each other. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...39da9fcff0.jpg |
Took out the pressure screw out but a magnet won't retrieve anything. The mightyvac just comes out with gas in the line and won't create suction to anything.
Here's a boroscope photo of the inside of the passage. Is it in there and stuck or missing where I need to check the floor? https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6fe6245725.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e644eb1e65.jpg Edit - looked under the lift. Nothing there. Tried to jumper the fuel pump for 1 second with rags over the open hole to see if it would shoot out, but no luck. If it's stuck in there, which line can I disconnect and use a compressor to force it out of the hole? |
Hi Pete,
I think that piston should move pretty easily. In fact, I'm not sure I see it in your pictures. Could it have fallen out? Probably not. Apparently that's a fine tolerance fit, and may not survive much damage from trauma or corrosion. Maybe Greg will be able to tell from your pictures. Good luck, Dave |
FD A - connected to WUR B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank D - connected to WUR C is the return to the tank to verify if the pressure regulator piston is actually in there, remove the connection at C and you should see the side of a cylinder with a groove in it some good photos are here https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...ulator-O-rings and a jammed one is shown here https://delorean.co.nz/mydmc/k-jetro...ooting-part-3/ |
Originally Posted by reanimotion
(Post 15919243)
B is the fuel input from the tank
C is the return to the tank to verify if the pressure regulator piston is actually in there, remove the connection at C and you should see the side of a cylinder with a groove in it some good photos are here https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...ulator-O-rings and a jammed one is shown here https://delorean.co.nz/mydmc/k-jetro...ooting-part-3/ |
I do believe we've identified the excessive fuel pressure issue.
Greg Brown wins this round as I believe he was the first to mention the stuck pressures regulator plunger. It's in there and it's still stuck even though I've removed the FD from the car, sprayed both ports that have access to it with penetrating oil and tried to pry it out using the groove that's accessible from the side port with a screwdriver, a pick, and even tried to gently wedge a tap in from the end to try and get it it to bite a little where I could turn it to free it or pull it out - none of those methods are working and it's still in there. Upon removing the 3 screws from the top of the FD to get it off the shoe, I had to use a manual impact hammer to free one of them and when it came out, the barrel was all rusty. So was the screen on the B inlet port to the threaded fitting it sits in. Guess I got overzealous when cleaning it and introduced a bunch of water based cleaning solution into it that then rusted the iron parts. A little penetrating oil on the bottom plunger has it working very freely, but I'm concerned with how much rust there may be inside and may not want to risk reinstalling it, even if I can get the jammed piece out. Ron Borras has a remanufactured one for his Euro he's going to let me have tomorrow and I'll replace it with a rebuilt one from Mark Anderson in a couple weeks when his comes back from the refurb shop, as this arrangement might let me still make the Rendezvous if that turns out to be my only issue. What a great community this is. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...62ab4e9821.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9c466c9a38.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e32e002ce5.jpg |
Hi Pete,
That looks like the deal. In fairness this is what I said in Post 376: (I know I was guessing, where Greg knows what he's talking about) "...I don't know much about K-jet injection, but it sounds like your pressure at idle was too high (rich), and at part throttle it is too low (lean). Pressure partially determines amount of fuel delivered, since the injectors flow continuously. Is it possible that some component in the pressure regulator is stuck? I don't know if that's even a reasonable question, but it sounds like something is working opposite to design, or not at all. As I read the WSM and my Fuel Injection book by Probst, the fuel pressure regulator is a part of the fuel distributor body, and depends on a spring activated valve which returns fuel to the tank depending on pressure..." The most important part of what I said was that I don't know much about K-jet. I was really hoping that Greg Brown would jump in and give insight. He finally did so, and it looks like he was right. Good job, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15919606)
Hi Pete,
That looks like the deal. In fairness this is what I said in Post 376: (I know I was guessing, where Greg knows what he's talking about) "...I don't know much about K-jet injection, but it sounds like your pressure at idle was too high (rich), and at part throttle it is too low (lean). Pressure partially determines amount of fuel delivered, since the injectors flow continuously. Is it possible that some component in the pressure regulator is stuck? I don't know if that's even a reasonable question, but it sounds like something is working opposite to design, or not at all. As I read the WSM and my Fuel Injection book by Probst, the fuel pressure regulator is a part of the fuel distributor body, and depends on a spring activated valve which returns fuel to the tank depending on pressure..." The most important part of what I said was that I don't know much about K-jet. I was really hoping that Greg Brown would jump in and give insight. He finally did so, and it looks like he was right. Good job, Dave Dave, evidently you know more than you've let on. Thanks for the help. Pete |
Just happy to help people with these cars, when I can.
|
Greg is the star. I'm just reading my books.
Dave |
Good tip, Greg. Especially like the tip to remove the fitting from the side and see the piston directly. :thumbup:
|
Tonight I was able to free the pressure valve from the FD by prying on the groove accessible through the side port. I guess after it sitting full of synthetic penetrating oil for 24 hours it decided to give up. With it on the end of a magnet it moves in and out smoothly, as does the bottom plunger and when the bottom plunger moves I can hear it pushing fluid or sucking.
I'm still meeting Ron in the morning to pick up his known good one off his Euro just in case when I reinstall mine, it doesn't hold the right control pressure or hold it steady. Worst (or best) case is mine works and I return Ron's to him at Rendezvous Uninstalled. We'll know something tomorrow one way or the other. 🤞 https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7dc1dbab65.jpg |
Eureka! Fingers crossed. I've heard old gas is bad for these systems and maybe this is one example of the problems caused. You might run some Techron or something similar through.
Good luck, Dave |
Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net
(Post 15924900)
Eureka! Fingers crossed. I've heard old gas is bad for these systems and maybe this is one example of the problems caused. You might run some Techron or something similar through.
Good luck, Dave |
I have used both of those products, and was satisfied. I have switched to Star tron enzyme fuel treatment, and Techron. Don't know which are the better.
Good luck on your startup. I think it will run fine. Dave |
Picked up the fuel distributor from Ron this morning. It had been installed in his Euro that sits outside and was a reman unit. The paint most companies use in the reman units isn't great and this one had already developed some external "patina".
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e19be6aff7.jpg I decided not to attempt to reinstall my own as I don't have time to do these projects twice and still make Rendezvous, so I'll keep mine as a spare or send it to a rebuilder, and get Ron another reman unit if this one resolves my issues. Since it was going into this freshly restored engine bay, it needed a clean up. I used rubber stoppers to block all the openings, then went to it with a couple of small wire wheels - one in a drill and a really small one in a dremel to relive all the light surface rust. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7b5c63385c.jpg Then I had my wife cut me some adhesive vinyl circles I could use to mask off, not only the fittings ports, but also the sealing surface where the crush washers for the banjo bolts go, as I thought uneven paint on those surfaces might prevent a proper seal. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a7d71ef516.jpg Then I mixed up about 2 oz. of a 2-part epoxy paint I bought that should be fuel resistant and brushed on a couple light coats in one sitting. The paint has a 50 min working time and 2 hour curing time. About 4 hours later it was mostly dry but I could feel a bit of tackiness, so letting it fully cure and harden overnight. Here's the finished product with the masking circles removed. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2802ea0abc.jpg Tomorrow I'll install it, along with a set of Greg Brown injector fuel lines I bought from Roger and I also put in another set of new Bosch injectors as I want all this to go back together once, and to work. |
With K-Jet mechanical CIS does it matter to which port on the fuel distributor the injector lines get connected to? With the GB stainless lines, they fit better if #4 and #8 both go to the rear port on the FD, but I think the OEM hard fuel line setup has #8 going to the front port on that side, which makes the SS line have an odd twist.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8350290d02.jpg I want to move #8 to the back port and shift all the other lines forward one port which will make the driver's side match the passenger side, but not if it's going to cause me a fuel delivery or distribution issue. On the 928ms website for Carl's adjustable fuel distributor he shows his as lines in the assembled photo going from #8 to the back port, so seems like that's OK. https://928motorsports.com/parts/cisdistributor.php Thanks. |
I don’t think it will matter as long as the lines are not kinked. There isn’t a rotating mechanism for distribution.
Good luck Dave |
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...85e2165940.jpg
With the new fuel distributor installed - IT RUNS! Without the supercharger installed. AFR at idle is 13.5 and without any load. Revving to 2,000, 3,000, and 4,000 RPMs it's in the 11.5-12 range which is a hair rich, but I'll see what things look like with the supercharger hooked back up and adjust the mixture screw from there, then might need to do further tweaks after doing an actual test drive with load. While I was holding the RPMs at 4,000 my KnockLink light flashed red so I got JP to hold the revs while I checked the timing (with the vacuum lines off), and sure enough, it was almost at 40 degrees of advance BTDC. I rolled it back to 28 degrees and did the same test, and no flashing light, so it looks like maybe that sensor is going to work and provide some knock detection protection. Bottom line is we're now making progress for the first time in a few weeks and I think the stuck pressure valve in the FD was the culprit. Big shout out to Ron for meeting me yesterday and pulling the FD from his Euro. As luck would have it today though, it's now pouring, so test drives will have to wait until tomorrow. I'll put the supercharger and intake back together and see where things are then. |
I'm pulling for ya, Buddy!
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15927541)
I'm pulling for ya, Buddy!
Thanks Carl. Does it matter which FD ports the individual injector lines are connected to? If it does can you provide the proper mapping for me. I can't find a good graphic in the PET diagram or WSM. Injector for cylinder # to port # on the FD. Let's start with port #1 being the first one clockwise of the center port that the WUR line connects to. Thanks. |
Good job Pete!
Dave |
No, it does not matter. All the 8 slits within the fuel distributor match, and the piston uncovers all of them equally and at the same time. Route them so they are nice and pretty :) No harm done.
|
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15927606)
No, it does not matter. All the 8 slits within the fuel distributor match, and the piston uncovers all of them equally and at the same time. Route them so they are nice and pretty :) No harm done.
Reassembly complete, including my 928MS strut brace :) Stationary test run also successful. Had to richwn the mixture a touch. Is between 12 and 13. 5 up to 5,000 rpm with no load. I'll see what happens tomorrow on a test drive, which I need to do anyway since the car is almost out of gas. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ddaf8ac6b1.jpg |
Well, it made it to and from the gas station about 5 miles away, but here's the list of issues:
At higher RPMs, the car feels strong and like it's firing on all cylinders. At lower RPMs, it feels like it's missing and sluggish. Is this a timing thing or a mixture thing? At the higher RPMs the mixture is richer so should I try to richen the mixture screw a little or will that make me too rich under light throttle conditions where I'm currently around 13? Spark plugs were all new NGK BR8ES and gapped at .028. It's possible they could have gotten fouled over the past few weeks with the richness at idle that the fuel pressure issue was causing, but that seems unlikely and I think they would have cleaned up on the test drive. On the positive side, Oil pressure is strong at 5. Cooling system is working great with the needle in the middle of the gauge when driving. Electric fans are kicking on just before the last white line and cooling things back off. Idle seems to be stable. When hot started, it fires immediately. Any thoughts or assistance on the tuning part would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. |
Pete,
Drive down with your son in your Cayenne. The Spyder is showing too many teething issues with the new heads/cams/etc. It might make the trip, but I also don't like the thought of your Spyder and your son on the side of the Interstate somewhere. Let's get this sorted before we push for The Long Drive. That's just my opinion. As to clutch - please see our dyno chart below of your car that was taken right after your Stage 2 kit was installed on your 4.5L motor. Note the peak torque rpm - is that about where your clutch is breaking free? Now that you have the 4.7 heads and valves, plus intake and throttle body, we would expect the output is even higher. Remember: clutches hold torque, not horsepower. The dyno below says that you were making 362 ft lbs of torque at the motor at that time. It's easy to believe you are at 400 ft. lbs of torque or more now. I would expect that Yes, you will have to put the clutch disks I gave you back in to hold it. Sorry buddy. Its inescapable - you make mods for more HP and Torque... you have to upgrade the clutch to match... its just the way it is. :) You lucky devil! https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f05d38a619.jpg |
Hi Pete,
That sounds decent. The clutch doesn't sound so good. Not sure if new, but maybe (doubtful) adjustable. You may need better friction material for all that power? It doesn't sound like you have your timing quite right. Try using your timing light and run the throttle to different speeds to see if the vacuum advance/retard functions are working. There is a WSM section on setting up the 1982 distributor timing. I have forgotten the details right now. Make sure you have that check valve T'd into the retard line so you can't blow into it from the open end. I would not run with the advance port disconnected or open to air. You might want to re-read my PM's about how that is supposed to work, but it assumes the distributor is fully functional. Best of luck. You have knocked down a whole lot of barriers, and only have a couple left. I know you will succeed! Dave |
Carl,
It's only Monday - can't throw in the towel on a Friday trip just yet... New update. I replaced the spark plugs figuring that all that rich and lean fluctuating with the fuel distributor problem may have messed up the set that was in there. I installed a set of Bosch Super copper Here are photos of the plugs I pulled. 6 of the 8 have very clean tips. The other 2 are dark. Are the 2 that are dark probably fouled and not firing which is why the engine didn't feel right? All 8 https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...abad434a0f.jpg 5-8 https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d787f45c40.jpg 1-4 https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e69b369777.jpg Are the other 6 too bright and clean and what does that tell us, or do those 6 look OK? I enriched the mixture screw about 1/8 turn. The test drive with the new plugs and new mixture setting was better. Engine idle was nice and stable AFR under coasting vacuum was 12.8 or so and was around 12.5 most of the rest of the time. I tried another full throttle and was 11 something at 2 lbs of boost before the clutch slipped again. Timing at 3,000 rpm and 4,000 RPM with both vacuum lines attached is right at 28 BTDC. Seems like I'm pretty close, other than the clutch, which I am going to swap back out tonight so I don't burn up the flywheel. |
Oil from the crankcase ventilation setup. What's causing this?
Braided stainless line is the crankcase vent line tied into the Bank 2 cam tower like it was before. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...248686e135.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...16ef9bbfd3.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...43ee17a53c.jpg |
Maybe you need a catch can? Some can drain back into the block.
Good luck, Dave |
Clutch pics. What do you see?
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7df312b391.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9da355ec16.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4e45ca1839.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0d0427f6c3.jpg https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fda5d436a3.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b6b33e8943.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0b304d0a00.jpg |
Looking at the clutch discs again I see the problem. There are grease spray lines that go out from the hub to the shiny surfaces on the friction discs.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...945f7aa6a4.jpg I thought the splined shaft was supposed to be lubricated with the super sticky clutch grease. Did I use too much? I've just finished putting the clutch back together with the other friction discs and the same lubricated splined shaft and am now concerned the same thing is going to happen, or maybe a little grease on those super grabby sintered metal friction discs is just what I need for a smoother engagement :) Should I try it like this or take it apart again before driving it and messing up these other friction discs? Will the grease eventually wear or burn off the sintered metal discs instead of being absorbed into the OEM friction material? Are those grabby enough to compensate for a little grease on them? |
Pete is that the original pressure plate or a new one? That thing looks like it's got hot spots from hell. I'd say you have a combination of the spline grease getting on the friction discs and a burnt PP.
|
Judging from the heat/wear on several of these metal inserts that there is some defect in the clutch plates themselves?
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ae890ef4c2.png It looks like the metal spot in the disc was in contact with the flywheel and caused hot spots and some metal transfer... Where are those clutch discs from and do you have the old ones or a new set? |
Originally Posted by 928 GT R
(Post 15931123)
Judging from the heat/wear on several of these metal inserts that there is some defect in the clutch plates themselves?
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ae890ef4c2.png It looks like the metal spot in the disc was in contact with the flywheel and caused hot spots and some metal transfer... Where are those clutch discs from and do you have the old ones or a new set? I have the sintered metal spec discs that came out and put those back in last night. They're super aggressive and will likely address any surface irregularities you see on the mating surfaces after the first couple engagements. Here are pictures of the spec discs that went back in last night and pictures of what the other parts looked like dirty the first time I took them out a couple months, and 2 short test drives ago (15 miles). Hopefully these other friction discs didn't permanently damage the other parts. There's plenty of meat left on these spec discs and they're super grippy and tough. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d8dfb69302.jpg https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...56a3cb91fc.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9538c996e4.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0a1c2f808a.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5da6ee9b52.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fd25fb412d.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...430629078b.jpg My biggest concern right now is the grease. I used the proper "super sticky grease" from Roger. When I initially put the clutch back together I had used a Teflon dry lube instead. It lasted exactly 2 moves in the driveway before the clutch started hanging up so I took it apart and used the proper stuff. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a8cf7d8e59.jpg https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38e961daa8.jpg This is what slung onto the friction material and I'm sure caused the slipping. Maybe I was right on the edge of those discs being able to hold the torque and with a little lube on them, no chance. Do we think with the much grabbier spec discs I'll be OK even if a little slings, or does it all need to come apart again. The friction material on these discs feels like metal so I don't think it will absorb any grease even if some gets on it. Thanks in advance for any advice. |
It does look like you may have been a bit liberal with your spline grease. Be very very stingy with that stuff. Causes more trouble than it helps.
|
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...945f7aa6a4.jpg I thought the splined shaft was supposed to be lubricated with the super sticky clutch grease. Did I use too much? |
Carl, so you're saying I probably need to pull it all apart again and remove the excess grease or will the other friction material on the discs compensate for my liberal greasing error?
|
If you are using those discs still, you can try degreasing them - I'd use carb cleaner to try to wash it out of the frictions discs. Can't guarantee it will work. Once the grease is absorbed into the NAO material, it isn't likely to come out. But you can try.
The discoloration of the spring fingers is a worry too. The clutch might be slipping because the pressure plate has weakened springs now. That bluing is pretty bad. Sorry Buddy. |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15931595)
If you are using those discs still, you can try degreasing them - I'd use carb cleaner to try to wash it out of the frictions discs. Can't guarantee it will work. Once the grease is absorbed into the NAO material, it isn't likely to come out. But you can try.
If you think the pressure plate may also be marginal, than I probably don't need any grease on the friction discs to make things worse. I never had any slipping of the clutch before - it was obvious the first time it happened here, but I checked the rear view mirror to see if maybe I had broken the rear end loose instead - no such luck. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7cc53bc796.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...afa8e4b080.jpg |
Compression #s
Cold engine. Fuel pump relay out. Coil wire off distributor. Throttle fully open. Range 150-158 with an average of 154 so all within about 5% of each other. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...193ececb7a.jpg |
Nothing wrong with those numbers.
|
Clutch has been back out, splined shaft, throwout bearing, and disc hubs wiped off (leaving only a residue of the slippery grease), then reinstalled.
I'll test drive it tomorrow to see what happens under full boost without clutch slippage! |
Fingers crossed. I have not heard of the dual disk slipping so easily with ~400
|
Hope all goes well Pete! Thanks to your grease slinging issue, I am going to pull my clutch back out and clean most of the high pressure grease off. I obviously applied WAY too much.
|
If you lube the spines at all, all you want is a surface smear of it. Wipe it on thinly, then wipe it off, done. Leave nothing that can sling when it rotates.
Next topic is the guide tube for the throw-out bearing. Slight film of grease there may help the TOB slide, but then again, any grease collects dirt and the abrasives that fall off the clutch as it wears. So, although it may help initially, it likely gets worse as the grease gets dirty and gritty. Its a harsh environment in there. Best to follow the same rules - wipe it on and wipe it off. A very thin film is best if you lube it at all. You want nothing that will become a dirt-magnet. |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15933933)
If you lube the spines at all, all you want is a surface smear of it. Wipe it on thinly, then wipe it off, done. Leave nothing that can sling when it rotates.
Next topic is the guide tube for the throw-out bearing. Slight film of grease there may help the TOB slide, but then again, any grease collects dirt and the abrasives that fall off the clutch as it wears. So, although it may help initially, it likely gets worse as the grease gets dirty and gritty. Its a harsh environment in there. Best to follow the same rules - wipe it on and wipe it off. A very thin film is best if you lube it at all. You want nothing that will become a dirt-magnet. What remains on any of these is a surface film so they don't feel dry but you can't see any grease. We'll give that a shot. |
Drove the car. Engagement and disengagement of the clutch isn't quite as smooth as it was when the splined shaft was overgreased, but seems to work fine, and most importantly, isn't slipping under boost anymore. It's possible I have some wear on my splined shaft and should probably upgrade it with one of Greg's new ones next time it comes apart, along with a new guide tube,
AFR #s: Under full boost - 11.5 rock steady up to about 5,000 RPM At idle - 12.5-13 Under light throttle for normal driving 13-13.5 Under vacuum (decelerating while in gear) - 14-14.5 so seems like it might be 1/2 point rich, but not bad. The KnockLink stayed green during all of the boost, higher RPM pulls. Timing setting is also holding. A trained ear from one of the experts at Rendezvous might help me tweak this a little. I'm losing boost again at about .4 bar so need to figure out where that's going too, but think the gasket at the metering plate for the intake shoe might be too soft and letting it escape. Will try something different there today to try and achieve a stronger seal. Heat Exchanger pump is also not running so need to free it again or figure out why, but that's not a show stopper. Still have some oil exiting the crankcase breather system. I'm going to try and rig something up where I can connect my boost gauge to the crankcase vent line and see what kind of pressure is actually going through it. I'm also going to try one of Carl's oil control baffle plates - currently I have Hans' installed and I think Carl's has fewer openings and a different drain back design that might keep more of the oil where it's supposed to be under boost. If the pressure is pretty normal and the other baffle plate doesn't change the situation, I may have to install an AOS instead of a vent setup. Now wish I'd kept the Motorsports version of the 997 AOS I had, but since it wouldn't fit my 997, I sold it. Overall the car runs and drives very well. Cold start worked great, Hot start fired right up. Other than the crankcase pressure / vent issue, I don't see a reason why it wouldn't make it to Atlanta, but will drive it around more today and tomorrow before making that call late Thursday. It won't be as clean and sparkly as I had planned, but I'll give it a regular wash. Wife is taking the Cayenne this weekend so I'd probably bring the RUF 997 if not the 928. I'd like to get the 928 there though for it to be a part of the event and to let the experts like Carl take a look and see if they'd make some timing or fueling tweaks to make it even better. |
My experience has shown that during your drive down, you will have no or nearly no emissions from your crankcase vent.
Its only under WOT that the PCV system on the 16v motor can be over-run, from about 5000 rpm and up if everything else isn't just perfect. So, partial-throttle driving in 5th gear isn't really an issue. You will be under 3K rpm, shouldn't be a problem. You know... about "losing boost at .4 bar" translates to just about 6 psi, which is what that kit was designed for. Hmm. When I see you I will help you diagnose it better - whether the boost is leveling off, or peaking and then dropping, I have some ideas. |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 15934558)
My experience has shown that during your drive down, you will have no or nearly no emissions from your crankcase vent.
Its only under WOT that the PCV system on the 16v motor can be over-run, from about 5000 rpm and up if everything else isn't just perfect. So, partial-throttle driving in 5th gear isn't really an issue. You will be under 3K rpm, all good. |
That's great news Pete!! Congrats. I know that's been one helluva adventure.
|
Good to know. I can see the vapor coming from that hose at idle, but no drips when idling. I'm going to rig up a hose to move the exit of that vent line to the rear of the car so it doesn't make the bottom all oily until we figure it out or resolve it with the other baffle plate. |
Today's test drive went well as far as the engine is concerned. On the last turn I was in moderate boost in a fairly low speed sharp turn and afterwards had this new rattle coming from the drivetrain - the Z06 trans always had a bit of a rattle sound from the solid mounts when the clutch is out, but this is a new rattle sound and it happens whenever the car is moving. Doesn't really happen if the car is stationary whether the clutch is in or out. I'm thinking it's transmission or torque tube.
Anyone have guesses on something that is fixable tonight - shaft not fully seated in pilot bearing, thowout bearing sleeve, etc or is my pursuit of taking it to Rendezvous over? |
Back in business.
Pulled the lower bell housing and the two 10mm bolts that secure the guide tube had come loose even though they had lock washers on them. Reinstalled and added flanged nuts to the other side. They're not coming loose again. Did a test drive and that noise is gone. Changing out the break-in oil now, washing it, and headed for PEC in the morning. |
I have been following along and must say that you have done an outstanding job! Outstanding perseverance! Makes my delays with my car before leaving look like a joke. Finished up on my car, really minor stuff, last night and I’m now halfway to Rendezvous. Looking forward to seeing your car and meeting you. Thanks for all of the updates.
Brian |
Thanks Brian.
I'm really looking forward to meeting all the 928 guys I see online every day and the awesome cars I've followed for years. Oil is changed and car is washed. Ready for morning departure. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1396808d77.jpg |
Picking this back up.
For those of you who made it to Rendezvous, you know I had a noise issue with the drivetrain that started when I got into Atlanta. It was very similar to the noise I had the day before leaving when the guide tube bolts came loose. I thought that happened again so once the noise started, I drove the car gingerly the rest of the way to Rendezvous. Then with Bob Voskian's boroscope and the use of the curb at PEC as a makeshift lift, I slid under the car to see if I could get a look at the guide tube bolts to see if in fact, that was the problem. Made for a good picture of a "shark" eating it's owner, but wasn't very effective, as I couldn't get a good look through the lower bell housing access hole. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1327fe9a40.jpg Not wanting to put additional miles on the car with the hopes of making it home under it's own power, or at least to get within 100 mile range for a free AAA tow, I skipped the Tech session and drive on Saturday afternoon. Good news is that the car would only make the noise under fairly hard acceleration or when turning, so made it home on Sunday without issue. Pulled the lower bell housing at home to find that the guide tube bolts and the lock nuts I added to the back side were still intact and nice and tight, so that was not the cause of the noise, like it seemed to be before I departed for Rendezvous. Started doing some research on the Corvette Z06 6s-speed transaxle I have in my Spyder and discovered other Corvette owners describing a similar noise that turned out to the the differential as it was more likely to make the noise during turns, which is when my noise first appeared. So I replaced my differential fluid that was not a few years old and had maybe 15-20k miles on it, then went for a test drive. Good news - no noise, even under heavy acceleration in corners and some full boost, higher RPM pulls. Bad news - got back and the engine valley had about 1/8" of orange fluid sitting in it. Fluid kind of smelled like coolant, but also kind of didn't. Not thinking my fluid protocol thought when putting the car back together, I did something kind of dumb. Since the engine and radiator were completely empty from the build, I had flushed it with water, then changed from the previous green ethylene glycol coolant I had been using to newer orange Dexcool to have better anti-corrosion characteristics. Unfortunately, the windshield washer fluid I use that get gets pumped through my supercharger heat exchanger is also orange, so I then had to figure out which fluid was in my valley. Because the washer fluid gets hot when pumping through the intercooler and the washer bottle cap doesn't really seal, therse is always a slight smell of hot washer fluid with the car. Since the valley fluid didn't have a totally strong coolant smell and I smelled the washer fluid, I thought maybe I had an issue or leak with my intercooler - so took that apart and tested it. Thought maybe the lower inlet clamp was loose so tightened that when putting it back together. I dried up the orange liquid in the valley and when for another test drive. Guess what - a new layer of orange liquid in the valley and this time I could tell it was coolant. Further inspection shows a coolant streak from the main fitting of the water bridge down the back side and into the valley - this is the large round fitting that takes a large o-ring and although I replaced the o-ring during my build, it still leaked - guess that's why when I took this off the old motor it was well coated with silicone gasket material, as this must be a known leak point. In addition, I also saw an oil streak in the same area and it's coming from where the water bridge mates with the oil control baffle I have installed. I don't know if the crankcase pressure was forcing that out or if I didn't get the water bridge and oil fill assembly tight enough when initially installing. Hans' oil control baffle uses a nice o-ring gasket in a groove on the bottom side and then the stock gasket on the top side between it and the water bridge. I had even silicone coated the gasket when I reassembled it. Since I have to take the water bridge off again to fix the coolant leak, I'll also get to fix the oil leak at the same time. Another contributor to the oil leak could be the pressure I'm trying to vent to atmosphere while I route the oil from that vapor back into the cam tower. The 90 degree cam tower fitting might be creating back pressure in the hose and enough of that can't escape out the vent hose and may have built up pressure in the oil baffle and water bridge junction. Next problem is that Carl discovered I was only running on 7 cylinders when he listened to my car at Rendezvous, and when I pulled the plugs, sure enough, #7 didn't look good and #5 didn't look much better. When I returned from Rendezvous, I pulled the plugs, so these have about 250 miles on them. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8c7830fbc9.jpg x https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38b3edd8e3.jpg I reinstalled a set of copper, triple electrode Bosch plugs in the same heat range to see if they would run longer between fouling. These are factory gapped at .030 which is a little on the open side, but at the top end of the acceptable 928 range. These are the plugs that were in the car for the couple of test drives when I discovered the coolant leak and tested whether the differential fluid change resolved the drivetrain noise, so had about 40 miles on them. Pulled them out and same exact coloring, so have a problem with 5 and/or 7. https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5364eae466.jpg x https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b556beaff9.jpg xx https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...912157378d.jpg Since my compression test was good cold and dry - 150-160 psi in all cylinders, I'm assuming the problem is likely fuel and/or spark on those two cylinders. So, I've now installed another new set of NGK BR8ES plugs gapped at .028. I've also swapped the 2 new fuel injectors for these cylinders with 2 of the non-rubber contaminated ones from my 4.5L engine that ran great. I also removed the new Magnecore ignition wires I had installed and reinstalled the set from my 4.5L motor. With new plugs, different injectors, and different ignition wires, if this set gets colored the same way, then I likely have bigger engine issues and will have to do a leak-down test to see if that sheds any light, but I'm hoping maybe I'm good now. When I get my next block of time, I'll be pulling the water bridge, installing Carl's oil control baffle and sealing the coolant tube and O-ring with silicone and putting it all back together, but I need to resolve my oil venting issue as well since my vent line is dripping actual oil and not just evacuating vapor.... |
Not sure this applies to your engine, but my 87 had similar fouling on #8 and it was due to a stuck piston ring. The engine in question sat under a tarp for years before I acquired it. The bores looked perfect so I saw no need to pull the pistons - that was a fatal mistake that resulted in a broken rod and trashed engine.
Hope I'm wrong. |
The previous post got long, so starting a new one for the oil vapor / crankcase venting project.
I need a more effective setup for the crankcase ventilation and think the current setup has a couple issues. Issue #1 is that the line that should return the separated oil droplets back into the cam tower has a 90 degree fitting at the cam tower and the pressure coming through that line hitting the 90 degree bend is forcing oil seepage out of the fitting there and it's oozing along the ridge of the cam tower. Issue #2 is that I think this 90 degree bend may backing up the line with pressure that's not allowing the pressurized vapor coming from the crankcase to exit efficiently and that may be a contributor to the oil leak on the water bridge and oil baffle plate. The way the current setup is designed to work, the crankcase vent line goes to the left side of the oil fill canister assembly that has a solid cylinder in it now to help separate the oil from the vapor. The vapor then exits out the right side of the oil fill cap and oil that is separated should run down the hose and into the cam tower, while the pressurized vapor goes out the stainless line and vents to atmosphere underneath the car. https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f39cb15923.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...029908711b.jpg ...except, I'm getting oil droplets out the vapor evacuation line. It was enough to spray Ron's windshield with a light coating over just a few miles while he was following me. So, I started looking into oil catch-cans and air/oil separators to better manage the vapor flow and separation of the oil from the vapor. Ideally I wanted an AOS and not a catch-can so that it wouldn't have to be emptied periodically and the separated oil can just return to the motor. The challenge with this type of setup is that the drain fitting on the bottom of the AOS has to be higher than the drain back point so the oil can flow down back into the motor. It is very difficult to find an effective and compact AOS that would fit in the open area on the driver's side firewall but still allow a downward flow back into the cam tower, but I thought I found a couple. I read very positive reviews on the IAG Competition AOS and the Perrin AOS. One of the problems with some AOS units is that when used in cold weather, because of condensation during engine warm up going through the AOS, then mixing with the oil, it creates a foam that then clogs up the drain line and the AOS making a mess and killing it's functionality. There are some good photos of this issue that some people have had with the Grimmspeed AOS, which looked compact enough to actually work for my application :( The solution to the foaming and clogging problem is to heat the AOS so that even in cold weather, it allows the oil (and condensation) to flow and not clog up the drain lines and the AOS itself. This is cleverly accomplished by the better AOS units having ports that circulate warm coolant from the motor, through a chambered off section of the AOS to keep the AOS unit warm. This is why I liked the IAG & Perrin units, but unfortunately, after contacting those companies for dimensions, no way they would fit.in my selected location. Now that I knew what some of the important features I wanted for my AOS were, I had just about given up and resigned myself to using a simple catch-can rather than an AOS but then came across a unit from Verus Engineering used primarily with Miata race cars. It was compact, had a warming coolant cavity, had an optional drain kit available and looked like it would fit where I wanted it to, so I ordered one with the coolant kit and the drain kit from Eric at Verus, who was super responsive to my initial request for information and my follow-up questions. https://www.verus-engineering.com/pr...r-nd-mx5-miata The Verus unit is designed to supplement a normal PCV system so has inlet ports for crankcase ventilation and the PCV line, then outlets back to the intake manifold and the bottom drain line back to the oil reservoir. If you examine the internals of the unit, it's actually a dual-chamber setup with inlets and outlets to the non-connected sides, so really two AOS units in a single housing. It is offered in 3 anodized colors. I almost went with the red, but it's a different color red than the rest of my powdercoated engine parts and was also on backorder, so went for the black version instead. Here are the units opened up where you can see the dual chamber design with the chamber shape that slows the air and takes it through the stainless mesh to separate the oil from the vapor. https://static.wixstatic.com/media/b...b4cb0~mv2.webp In my 928 application, I only need to vent the 1 crankcase line through the AOS, so I'm going to split the line into two inputs to the AOS with a Y or T connector - one into each inlet chamber of the AOS (either both outside ports or both inside ports) - and have dual outlets venting to atmosphere. One of the reasons I chose the driver's side firewall for the fitment is because my heat exchanger to intercooler fluid line runs right under there already. I'm going to T into that line for the fluid inlet to the AOS and outlet from the AOS so rather than creating a breach in my cooling system which could an additional point of failure for a critical engine subsystem, I'm going to use the intercooler fluid, which isn't critical as the car and supercharger will run fine without any fluid should a leak develop, it just won't generate as much boost by not cooling the charge air. The Ts in the fluid line will allow the majority of the fluid to pass straight through the larger 3/4" hose while a little bit gets routed up the 5/16" hoses to the chamber in the AOS.then back out. The larger through fittings will keep most of the fluid passing straight to the intercooler where the volume moving through is important. Routing it only up through the chamber in the AOS would compromise or restrict the fluid flow through the intercooler. Here's what that separate chamber in the back of the AOS looks like. https://static.wixstatic.com/media/b...85ba70~mv2.jpg I've figured out the location and mounting position. First I took a stencil of the back cover for the AOS in the center and am going to mount it using 3 studs in the center V bolt holes. Once I made the stencil, I taped it to the firewall so I could get the AOS as high as possible, but have the drain valve and body clear everything in that area. https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d8a8da57c3.jpg Then I used a punch to mark the holes, reached through the backside of that wall to be sure my drill wasn't going to hit anything and drilled the clearance holes for the M6 bolts I'd be using. In order to create clearance between the AOS body and firewall for the curves in the wall, I used two T-nuts threaded onto a stud. Since I didn't have studs long enough, I first threaded on an M6x1.0 die, then screwed the T-nuts onto long M6 stainless bolts, put some loctite on the threads, then screwed the bolt into the AOS, then tightened the T-nuts against the cover plate of the AOS. After the bolt and T-nuts were tight, I cut off the end of the bolt using a cut-off wheel and then worked the die back off the screw to clean up the threads so I would be able to easily screw a nut onto that end once I pass them through the holes I drilled in the firewall. Using the T-nuts as the standoffs allowed me to secure the back cover to the AOS just like the original button head screws did, which is important, as there will be fluid flowing through that cavity and I don't want it to leak. Here's what that assembled setup looks like with the banjo fittings for the intercooler fluid line and the dual T-nut stand-offs installed. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5c77d0554b.jpg https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...36130aa9e7.jpg Here it is positioned in the holes but not fully installed yet as I'm going to do my hose connections and routing before fastening it to the wall, but need to wait for all the fittings to arrive before I do that. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...98289df6a4.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7bc594c933.jpg As it turns out, I'm not comfortable that the bottom drain fitting is high enough to drain the oil back into the cam tower bolt so I'm going to tie in into the hose that runs from the oil filler assembly down the front of the motor into the metal line that feeds into the oil pan. The Verus AOS seems to be a well though out design as the drain kit also includes a 1-way check valve. It's installed so any pressure from the crankcase or oil pan back into the AOS drain line can't force oil back into the AOS, but when the car is not running the check valve drops open so accumulated oil can run back into the pan. The plumbing is going to look like this.
I'm looking for input on the 2 red items above or any additional suggestions or comments if anyone has any. I'm hoping once I get this setup installed and the coolant and oil leak taken care of that the car is back in business so I can enjoy some beautiful top-down driving as the cooler weather approaches. |
Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta
(Post 16023357)
Not sure this applies to your engine, but my 87 had similar fouling on #8 and it was due to a stuck piston ring. The engine in question sat under a tarp for years before I acquired it. The bores looked perfect so I saw no need to pull the pistons - that was a fatal mistake that resulted in a broken rod and trashed engine.
Hope I'm wrong. I'm hoping it was bad injectors or plug wires, but I guess we'll see. Not sure I have the heart, nor the funds to start this process over again. |
Pete, you are a stud!! Great work and great perseverance! I know you will get it worked out. Wonderful attention to detail, as usual.
Dave |
I'll be interested to see how that Versus separator works out.
|
Usually when there's pressure in the crankcase and blowing oil, it's indicative of excessive blowby. The pressure has to go somewhere and it's thru the seals and fittings.
Hopefully it's not the case for your engine though. Perhaps you can rig up a pressure guage to measure the crankcase pressure to rule that out. |
Originally Posted by SwayBar
(Post 16027014)
Usually when there's pressure in the crankcase and blowing oil, it's indicative of excessive blowby. The pressure has to go somewhere and it's thru the seals and fittings.
Hopefully it's not the case for your engine though. Perhaps you can rig up a pressure guage to measure the crankcase pressure to rule that out. Any other tests I can do? Thanks. |
I had another thought here. If you look at the way the current crankcase ventilation and oil recovery system is setup, the crankcase vent gasses should separate from the oil with the gas escaping out the vent to atmosphere and the condensed oil flowing back into the driver's side cam tower via the 90 degree fitting.
It just occurred to me that the two plugs that are fouling 5 & 7 are on the same side that this oil return line is on. Is it possible that it's the oil being returned this way that's fouling those plugs, or at least the #5 plug. Seems with this theory that 6 would also get fouled, and it isn't, but maybe the air flow inside the cam tower moves the oil to the left and right. The new AOS setup will route the returning oil back to the pan instead of to the cam tower. Might that keep these plugs cleaner? I'm also thinking that instead of splitting just the crankcase vent line that maybe I'll run that directly into one of the AOS ports and run vent lines from the two cam towers into the other AOS input line or would ports on the cam towers create vacuum as opposed to pressure as I don't want to suck any of the stainless mesh in the AOS that helps to separate the oil into the cam tower. Current venting setup looks like this. Also, am I better off running the crankcase vent line that goes into the passenger side of the oil fill assembly directly to the AOS and capping off that port on the oil fill assembly, or running it into the oil fill assembly as it is now and then sending the output line from the other side of the oil fill assembly to the AOS? I'm wondering if I'm just recirculating some of the pressure coming from the crankcase vent line to the oil pan via the oil fill assembly the way it is now. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a30ebb0b7a.jpg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b6ceef86c1.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6bbac10072.jpg |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 16027061)
How would I test for that? Isn't blowby caused by combustion pressure getting past the rings and into the crankcase? and if so, wouldn't that mean compression in that or those cylinders would be compromised? The compression test I did looked good with all cylinders between 150-160. Would a leak down test be more telling and if so, how is one of those performed? I believe I have to get each cylinder to TDC, pressurize them and then see what the leakage rate is. Is that correct?
Any other tests I can do? Thanks. You can measure crankcase pressure by putting a Mityvac pressure gauge in the dipstick hole. The rest, I don;t know about, but I did this on my car. Good luck, Dave |
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...31e527f414.jpg
for what i know, every engine has blowby and with a supercharger it only get's worse. Sure on engines of 30 years old… Seen it on so many BMW's ….. myself , i had a supercharger installed on a BMW 850i with only 6 /7 PSI boost to see the sump gasket leaking …. a lot ! ( and i'm not alone, others had the same problem )…. instead of "gambling" with new gaskets, i installed a Moroso vacuum pump ( belt driven ) and a catch tank . Works perfect … instead of oil leaks it just suck air in now. PS Catch tank is a "big" one , with a air/oil separator as used with dry sumps tanks. There i can drain the "milky" residue of oil/water condens... bit of oil is not bad , even needed to lubricate the pump. I don't go in high vacuum as dragsters use to do for HP gain… there you can affect oil pressure and needs special adaptions. I dialed it in at 100 gr engine vacuum , just enough to keep sump at vac and no more oil leaks. My race shop tryed it at high vac for rally cars and there's even danger of sucking in oil seals !! https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7e1c744a38.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2a18e9a44d.jpg |
Over the past few weeks, I removed the water bridge and oil fill assembly and reinstalled them with sealant instead of gaskets this time. Not using gaskets on the sides of the water bridge will allow the center fitting with the large o-ring to sit deeper in the opening. I test fit it with gaskets and without and with the gaskets, I can actually rock it back and forth slightly. Without gaskets, the bottom circle of the water bridge rests on the machined lip in the female housing and it doesn't rock at all. I also added a little sealant around this lip and around the o-ring before I assembled it.
For the oil fill assembly, I've now installed Carl's 928MS Oil Control Baaffle Plate and put those assemblies together with gasket sealant as well. My previous oil leak in this area was coming out between the gasket above Han's oil control baffle and the base of the oil fill housing. The gasket used there was an OEM one. Because the water bridge is a little lower now (no gaskets) and I've added height to the oil fill assembly with the addition of Carl's baffle plate, I wanted to make sure the oil fill assembly wasn't interfering with the water bridge not seating correctly and using only sealant as the gasket between the pieces, there is no interference. I then continued on with the installation of the Verus AOS and all that remains is to run the vent outlets to atmosphere, but because of the hose turns, needed to pickup a couple springs to slip inside so the hoses make a nice bend instead of kinking and narrowing. Captions for the photos are below each picture https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17ddbb6740.jpg Passenger Side Cam Tower Vent connection https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...50735895ac.jpg Driver's side Cam Tower vent. This one and the one from the passenger side Y together and then enter one input port of the dual chamber AOS. The metal connector is a one-way check valve to make sure none of the stainless mess separation media in the AOS can be sucked back into one of the cam towers. These hoses should have pressure all the time and never vacuum, but better safe than sorry. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...97d3ba3399.jpg Crankcase Vent line. This now wraps around the front of the oil fill assembly instead of connecting to it. I was concerned that the pressure coming from that hose was just recycling back into the oiling system and adding more pressure so now the vent line is completely separate and I capped off both the inlet and outlet ports from the oil fill cap. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...68a9ccfd4d.jpg This is the crankcase vent line wrapping around the oil fill housing then running under the spider legs and into the other inlet of the dual chamber AOS. There's a 1-way check valve in this line too. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b2ef9a7431.jpg Here is the AOS mounted on the fire wall with both lines installed into the inlets for each chamber https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...403f41c398.jpg Running underneath the AOS is the line from my heat exchanger to my intercooler for the supercharger. I added 2 Ts to this line with hoses that run to the rear chamber on the AOS. What this does is allow the hot intercooler fluid to heat the AOS so the oil that gets separated doesn't congeal when it's cold and clog up the oil drain line. This fluid compartment is machined as a separate chamber in the AOS so no risk of contamination back into the oiling system. https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0e2b5a0751.jpg Coming out the bottom of the AOS is a 90 degree curved elbow that is the drain port. This is where the separated oil exits and runs back to the oil pan. This picture shows the 1-way check valve that came with the AOS drain kit so when there is positive pressure in the oiling system, it closes off and doesn't let that back feed into the AOS. When the car is turned off, that oil will use gravity to drain the line back to the oil pan. https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5626dea295.jpg Here's a close-up of the drain fitting. It's tied into the line from the oil fill chamber down the front of the engine into the oil pan. The drain line is the 90 degree fitting coming in from the side. https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...09276dc918.jpg Here's a wider angle view. The atmosphere vent lines will be connected to the two outlet ports from the AOS, Y'd together to a single vent line that runs down the drivers side engine compartment wall near the power steering hoses. Because both the oil drain line and the atmosphere vent line will be in the same area as the driver's side header, I fire-sleeved both those lines with DEI Fire Sleeve to keep the heat away from the rubber lines. I also used about an 8" leftover piece on the passenger side Cam Tower vent line where it lays across the backside of the supercharger. The only thought I had after writing this post was that if I'm producing a fair amount of oil, the check valve for the drain line might be too close to the AOS and I may need to relocate it closer to the connection back to the oil pan so I can use the capacity of the drain hose upstream of the check valve to capture the separated oil. For those of you who know what you're doing, does this seem like it's going to work properly as I envisioned it would or would you change parts of how it's done. Thanks. |
Your installation is very workman-like and correct. Whether it will work or not is up to that Air-Oil separator you have installed. I am not familiar with that model and I'm a little concerned how good it can be at what it is supposed to do in such a small package. If it works - that'd be great, as the AOS's that currently work well are all really big. I's love to hear that there is a smaller alternative on the market that works.
Have you ever put a boost gauge on the dipstick tube and driven the car? This would tell us whether there is a wee bit of boost in the crankcase or a whole lot of it... |
Originally Posted by Carl Fausett
(Post 16053066)
Your installation is very workman-like and correct. Whether it will work or not is up to that Air-Oil separator you have installed. I am not familiar with that model and I'm a little concerned how good it can be at what it is supposed to do in such a small package. If it works - that'd be great, as the AOS's that currently work well are all really big. I's love to hear that there is a smaller alternative on the market that works.
Have you ever put a boost gauge on the dipstick tube and driven the car? This would tell us whether there is a wee bit of boost in the crankcase or a whole lot of it... No, I've not measured crankcase pressure at the dip stick. That's difficult for me to do since I have a dipstick extender installed onto my dipstick so I can easily check the oil around the supercharger. If it works, I'm assuming I'll get no to very little oil out of the atmosphere vent line from the AOS exit ports. If it doesn't, then I'll see oil coming out like I was previously, correct? |
If it works, I'm assuming I'll get no to very little oil out of the atmosphere vent line from the AOS exit ports. If it doesn't, then I'll see oil coming out like I was previously, correct? |
Well, now I think I'm officially screwed. Was buttoning up the AOS install with the vent lines, went to refill the cooling system using my AirLift and the first time it pulled vacuum to 20 which is borderline on the gauge for a proper full refill, but wouldn't go further. Shutting of the valve, it wasn't holding vacuum, but this sometimes happens when you can't get a good seal at the reservoir so I proceeded anyway and it still pulled most of the coolant from the bucket. Pulled vacuum a second time to try and finish the job and this time it only got to 10 on the gauge and I could hear air leaking from somewhere in the motor. Got my pressure tester and pressurized the cooling system to 10 and the engine valley started to fill with coolant again, but this time, it wasn't coming from the front water bridge. I couldn't detect where the coolant stream was coming from. Checked the rear HVAC fitting and opposite side block off plates and those bolts could've been tighter but the plate and fitting were dry around them.
Then I saw it. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a29699f448.jpg This is coolant leaking between the head and the block, right? So another blown head gasket? What's odd is that this is on Passenger side, which is the opposite one to the side where I had the 2 plugs getting fouled (that was #s 5 & 7) and this leak is between 2 and 3. Could this be what was causing excessive crankcase pressure and causing my other issues? If that's what this is, I'm sad to say I'm probably done with this car for a while and will just put it away until looking at it stops making me cry. If this is something simpler than that to correct, then please let me know. Kevin Berez, are you looking for an engine rebuild project to do in your spare time? If so, shoot me an email and let me know what you'd charge to take it apart and put it back together, but it's unlikely I have the funds to proceed with that project currently. |
Originally Posted by Petza914
(Post 16053738)
Well, now I think I'm officially screwed. Was buttoning up the AOS install with the vent lines, went to refill the cooling system using my AirLift and the first time it pulled vacuum to 20 which is borderline on the gauge for a proper full refill, but wouldn't go further. Shutting of the valve, it wasn't holding vacuum, but this sometimes happens when you can't get a good seal at the reservoir so I proceeded anyway and it still pulled most of the coolant from the bucket. Pulled vacuum a second time to try and finish the job and this time it only got to 10 on the gauge and I could hear air leaking from somewhere in the motor. Got my pressure tester and pressurized the cooling system to 10 and the engine valley started to fill with coolant again, but this time, it wasn't coming from the front water bridge. I couldn't detect where the coolant stream was coming from. Checked the rear HVAC fitting and opposite side block off plates and those bolts could've been tighter but the plate and fitting were dry around them.
Then I saw it. https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a29699f448.jpg This is coolant leaking between the head and the block, right? So another blown head gasket? What's odd is that this is on Passenger side, which is the opposite one to the side where I had the 2 plugs getting fouled (that was #s 5 & 7) and this leak is between 2 and 3. Could this be what was causing excessive crankcase pressure and causing my other issues? If that's what this is, I'm sad to say I'm probably done with this car for a while and will just put it away until looking at it stops making me cry. If this is something simpler than that to correct, then please let me know. Kevin Berez, are you looking for an engine rebuild project to do in your spare time? If so, shoot me an email and let me know what you'd charge to take it apart and put it back together, but it's unlikely I have the funds to proceed with that project currently. I thought maybe the vacuum diaphragm in the photo was blocking my view of the fitting that feeds the heater core and that it was leaking and running along that ridge, so I removed the diaphragm and repressurized a little, and it wasn't coming from there, but was wet in the same spot again. Then looking further right, I saw coolant running around the #1 spark plug boot so there's definitely a leak at that water bridge fitting I put together with silicone but no gasket, so I have to take the water bridge off again and use gaskets, and then see where I am on the next test. Can I test the system without coolant and listen for air leaks or is it not the same as pressurizing with coolant. |
I would think you could pressurize with air then use soapy water to look for leaks might work. Fingers crossed its something simple.
Good luck, Dave |
Pete if I read this correctly I would suggest you drain the block then remove the hoses to the WB then remove the WB
take out the fat rubber seal then set the WB on your engine an use a flashlight to see what the gaps are at each head if the heads have been cut then the angle has changed at the WB mating surface use a feeler gauge to determine the gaps if your careful you can surface the WB mating surface to meet the head put some sticky on a 180 grit paper onto a flat surface an work the surface angle so each side is fitting flat then use a gasket with with some RTV |
If you can tell which edge is leaking you could shave a gasket to match the gap. Removing metal is irreversible - go too far and you're forked.
If you are going to shave the water bridge I would suggest getting a 1/2" thick piece of tempered glass, wrap the 180 grit around it and work the water bridge back and forth. This is same thing I do for 85-86 oil fillers that leak. Better control. Good luck. |
You can probably test with air, but keep in mind that air will sometimes leak in cases where water will not.
|
Thanks everyone.
The first time I assembled it a few months ago with the side gaskets, the sides didn't leak, it was the center fitting with the large o-ring that did. So I took it apart the other day and reassembled it without any gaskets, using just red sealant on all the mating surfaces, including around the bottom circle of the large round center fitting and around the o-ring goove, in addition to the o-ring. That's when the center section was good and the passenger side leaked. So last night, had another one of my up until 3 AM work sessions, took it all apart again, removed all the sealant - that stuff bonds so well, how it leaks is beyond me - and put it all back together using both things that worked on each part from the 2 previous times. I now have gaskets on the sides with a smear of sealant on them, along with sealant in the o-ring groove, plus the o-ring, and around the bottom flange where it goes it. I'm letting the sealant setup for the recommended 24 hours and am then going to pressurize the system before adding any coolant to see if it holds pressure. I think I might also have a leak at the rear passenger side fitting where it goes to the heater core hose, but when I removed the bolts to take it off and redo it, it was bonded so well from the first installation (gasket plus sealant) that I decided to leave it alone and put the bolts back in. That one I can access much easier if I need to change it if it's leaking without having to do a whole bunch of disassembly and I only had 2 of the trapezoidal gaskets on hand that I needed to use on the front bridge. We'll see what happens and I can order a couple more gaskets from Roger and fit that fitting next week if it turns out to be leaking. Also, unless the head gasket is leaking right there in my previous picture, I don't think there is an easy way for the rear fitting to put coolant there. My car currently has the front wheels on ramps so it's canted backwards. Seems more likely that the front leak may have run rearward along that ridge than the back leak running uphill to get to that area, but we'll see. It's also possible that I do in fact have a failed head gasket in that area and the coolant was coming out from the head to block junction. For those of you with experience, does that happen, or does the leak usually happen internally like when my 4.5L motor overheated and blew the head gasket, putting coolant into the cylinders. |
Went to pull a vacuum on the 928 and it won't hold vacuum. The hissing sounds like it's coming from the same joint on the water bridge that I tried to repair last night, so the bridge must not be seating to the block well enough to seal.Gonna have to take it apart again and work on how those parts mate as Kevin and Stan have suggested. Both my wife and some believe the sound is coming from that area, which means it's probably not the head gasket, but we'll see.
This is fun. |
Try listening with a stethoscope (with the head removed) to micro locate the hissing sound...
|
If you're up for a new tool, I recommend an ultrasonic leak detector. I have this one and find it to be invaluable:
INFICON 711-202-G1 Whisper Ultrasonic Leak Detector You can use it in loud environments, on tiny leaks, etc. |
All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:56 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands