Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums

Rennlist - Porsche Discussion Forums (https://rennlist.com/forums/)
-   928 Forum (https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum-69/)
-   -   Blown/Damaged Head Gasket? (https://rennlist.com/forums/928-forum/1134055-blown-damaged-head-gasket.html)

Petza914 03-17-2019 02:02 AM

Blown/Damaged Head Gasket?
 
Unfortunately, I think I have a blown head gasket in my 79 K-Jet supercharged car, but was looking for confirmation of my diagnosis before determining how to proceed with the repair.

A few weeks ago, I developed a hole in a coolant line and sprayed all the coolant out of the car. Where I realized it was happening and the temperature gauge got hot with the flashing red warning, I wasn't in a place where I could stop, not near a store to buy coolant, or make a repair, so I drove a few more miles figuring it would be OK and that an influx of fresh air would keep the temperature partially under control.

What contributed to this error in judgement was that prior to that for a couple weeks, my cooling fans weren't kicking on and when the car started to get hot, as long as I was underway on the highway with decent speed, the temperature would drop back down to normal as the air going through the radiator pulled the heat away from the circulating coolant. This is what I thought was taking place on this day and I had just cleared the traffic as the temp started to spike, so thought I was lucky and the temp would be dropping back down any minute, but with the different problem, and coolant having escaped, there was nothing for the air rushing through the radiator to cool and it overheated pretty badly.

By the time I got somewhere I'd be able to get supplies and make the repair (a Wal-Mart), it was looking like this

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ea7c73eece.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...561f4ef82e.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d2a391ba8d.jpg


In the last picture you can see where they clamp had been placed originally, and it was just to the left of that clamp position where the hose had ballooned out enough for the clamp to cut the hose. What you see in the first 2 pictures, is this puncture in the hose directing a high pressure spray of coolant vapor at the radiator and that's why it looks like the radiator is leaking. This event occurred while the supercharger was deinstalled and having some upgrades which is why it's not visible in the photos.

Once things cooled down, there was enough metal pipe inside the black hose, where I could simply move the clamp a little to the right, reclamping the hose upstream of the puncture. I then added about 3.5 gallons of 50/50 mix of anti-freeze and distilled water and was able to drive the rest of the way home without any issues and a completely normal temperature gauge - figured I was lucky and all was good.

I then replaced all the coolant hoses and refilled with a fresh mix of 50/50. Over the next couple days, I kept an eye on the coolant level and it dropped a little bit - figured it was air trapped in the system working it's way out through the expansion tank. I topped it up and then decided to do a pressure test. I pumped the system up to 14 psi

It takes 1 minute for the pressure to drop from 14 psi to 11 psi
another 1 minute to drop from 11 psi to 10 psi
and then 2 minutes to drop from 10 psi to 9psi
and longer than 2 minutes to drop from 9 psi to 8 psi

I don't see any active dripping at any of the hoses.

I also tested the cap separately. It says 7 psi on it and seems to hold exactly 7 psi.

I wasn't 100% in the first test that I was getting a great seal on the coolant reservoir, so I bought a more complete pressure test set and ran the test again when it arrived and the leak down time from 14 psi was significantly slower. I didn't drive the car that day.

The next time I did drive it, it started rougher than usual and as I was backing out of the garage saw some smoke. It cleared up pretty quickly and the car ran fine on that trip. I had just topped up the coolant reservoir before doing the pressure test and noticed some coolant on the ground when I came back out to the car, but it was located right below the overflow hose that's connected to the coolant reservoir - figured I overfilled it and was purging the excess, which I have done a couple times previously. During all this time, the temperature gauge is behaving perfectly, actually better than it has been, but I notice when I park the car that I hear a glugging sound. Happens every 5 to 10 seconds and then the interval gets longer over the course of the next 2 minutes until it stops, but it sounds like it's coming from the fuel tank area and not from the engine.

I do some research on this topic and think maybe it's a heat soak issue vaporizing fuel in the rails, but I don't remember it happening previously, even in the middle of the summer, which seems odd. When the noise is happening, loosening the gas cap does not seem to release any pressure or have a vacuum effect and it doesn't stop the noise from finishing it's cycle.

I think everything may be OK and I'll check into the shut down glugging sound soon, but this morning I started the car and got the same smoke out the back. Today I got out of the car and walked into the smoke cloud and it's definitely coolant and not oil, so I think when I park the car, the glugging sound may be coolant leaking into the head from the pressure built up in the system and that may be what's also causing the glugging sound and maybe maybe that sound is coming from the coolant reservoir and not the gas tank. When I restart the car, that coolant that leaked in burns and makes the white smoke cloud I'm seeing.

When I thought it might be a head gasket, I looked at the dipstick and don't see any foaming like coolant is mixing with the oil, nor do I have any brown oil floating in the coolant reservoir.

Does this sound like a head gasket problem or could it possibly be something else? If it is a head gasket, how big is this project on a 16v motor and can it be done with the motor in the car? Is there a DIY somewhere on a 16v motor so I can see what all needs to be removed?

This is what the motor looks like with the upgraded supercharger reinstalled and I just got it running really well after finding a boost leak, fixing the electric cooling fans issue, rewiring the heat exchanger pump and repairing the washer fluid bottle so there is actually fluid to pump through the heat exchanger - thought I was in good mechanical shape for SITM and the PEC get together, but now think I have another project to do or have done (probably don't have the time or space) prior. Thanks for reading through all this info and providing your opinions.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a32cc66fe1.jpg

polecat702 03-17-2019 02:26 AM

I had head gaskets blow on the exhaust valve side in my blower motors in the Pantera. It stopped when we O ringed the heads. I'd do a compression test on each cylinder. They don't always pop where you get water in the oil. I've seen them let go and the exhaust gasses push all the coolant out thru the cooling system. BTW, I got my radiator cap from Roger, and I believe it's a 13 pound cap. Also Greg Brown says the head gaskets on these cars are failing due to age related problems. My 89 is supercharged, and I'll be changing head gaskets as a precaution when I do the top end refresh.

soontobered84 03-17-2019 02:27 AM

Seems to me that you might have a small head leak coolant into a cylinder(s), hence the white coolant smelling smoke on startup and the slow pressure drain with the tester.

Petza914 03-17-2019 02:53 AM

Thanks for the quick responses guys.
  1. So if it is a small head leak, how critical is repairing it and how quickly?
  2. Will it do damage to the motor if the coolant isn't actually mixing with the oil and the little bit that's burning is just going out the exhaust?
  3. If it is leaking, could it fail catastrophically and hydro-lock the engine, like at a gas station, or will it continue to get progressively worse slowly?
  4. Could I boroscope through the spark plug holes to determine which cylinder(s) are leaking?
  5. Does this usually happen on one bank and is that the only one I'd need to fix or do I need to do both?

soontobered84 03-17-2019 03:14 AM

First and foremost, it will not fix itself.(Captain Obvious at your service)

Second, all you ask above depends on a lot of different things, among them the severity of the leak.

Third, I would start by pulling the spark plugs one by one to find out what and which you are dealing with. Once you find out exactly what you are dealing with, then make your decisions.

Petza914 03-17-2019 03:18 AM


Originally Posted by soontobered84 (Post 15709297)
First and foremost, it will not fix itself.(Captain Obvious at your service)

Second, all you ask above depends on a lot of different things, among them the severity of the leak.

Third, I would start by pulling the spark plugs one by one to find out what and which you are dealing with. Once you find out exactly what you are dealing with, then make your decisions.

New product idea - self-healing head gaskets :)

Good advice on pulling the plugs and that's what I'll need to do. Might do a compression test at the same time as Polecat suggests.

I would assume if the leak was bad I'd see the coolant smoke all the time, and not just on an initial start after an overnight sit, so I'm guessing it's pretty minor at this stage, but will still need to be fixed.

polecat702 03-17-2019 03:43 AM

Pete, if it leaks into a cylinder, and you turn over the engine you could bend a rod. You can't compress a liquid. Do as John suggests, and a bore scope is a good idea too. If you pull one head you might as well do both. I'm not sure if yours is the engine that has head studs as opposed to bolts. You might have to pull the engine, to change out the head gaskets. Good Luck!

soontobered84 03-17-2019 03:46 AM

Yes, I'd do a compression test as well. Steam-cleaned plugs will tell you which cylinders are affected.

Sounds like a good plan. I just hope you didn't warp your heads.

928 GT R 03-17-2019 06:35 AM

While starting your car at this point does imply risk of rod damage, the smell of burning coolant is distinct.

You suggested that you can smell coolant in the exhaust cloud. Be sure to perform the start-up (white smoke) test on a low humidity day with the wind coming from behind the car so you isolate the exhaust smoke and do not accidentally smell coolant burning off in your engine compartment. Springtime is a notoriously humid period and it is possible (although unlikely given the overheating event) to confuse the white smoke with normal condensation burn off.

The above suggested visual examinations of the plugs, scope and compression tests should confirm which cylinder/s you are dealing with.

If doing one head, do them both! It is never worth it to skimp on doing a complete job when you are performing all the labor to get in there!

Sorry that this happened, but we are all going to have to do our heads eventually and it seems that doing them sooner rather than later is a reasonable maintenance item at this time in our cars life cycle.

P.S. Love your collection of cars! :bowdown:

C531XHO 03-17-2019 08:18 AM

I have removed 16v heads in each of my 1985s one with the block in one by pulling the engine. Yes it can be done in the car but really pulling the engine is not difficult...just opens up a bigger rabbit hole....

If you take it out and fully apart you can do "everything" and know where you are.

Mrmerlin 03-17-2019 09:30 AM

Pete as others have suggested, I would concur with the pull the plugs.
You could also look into the cylinder and see if it has coolant in it before turning it over,
My Swiss car had this two cylinders had green deposits on the plug tips.

Usually the right cylinder bank is the one most effected by coolant issues since its got a source fore air intrusion via the HCV

Please post a picture of the plugs, that will tell what plug/cylinder is leaking.

Since you didnt provide any background info about your engine , IE it still has the original HGs or not.
If they have never been done then they will need to be. this is a wear item at this point.

The heads can be removed in the car,
this block has studs,
but the 16 valve heads are not as big as the 32 V type.
And the cam towers will have to come off first, a PITA in the car

In reality its much easier to work on this engine out of the car.

SwayBar 03-17-2019 11:00 AM

If you plan on doing just the heads, leave the engine in - it's A LOT more work pulling and reinstalling the engine.

If the engine requires a going-thru, then pull it, and take your time with it.

Petza914 03-17-2019 11:17 AM

I have some other engine leaks (pan gasket, something up higher, etc) so this is probably the straw that's going to require engine removal. I'm making some inquiries to people that could do this work for me and a few other things as I don't have the time or space to tackle this currently and don't want to be without the car for the 6 months it would take me to do it.

Petza914 03-17-2019 11:20 AM

Maybe it's time to try and locate a solid Euro motor...

Bigfoot928 03-17-2019 12:18 PM

pull the plugs. if coolant is leaking into a cylinder, one plug will be "steam cleaned" and cleaner than the rest.

SwayBar 03-17-2019 12:26 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15709636)
Maybe it's time to try and locate a solid Euro motor...

Jean-Louis is running a Euro in his racecar at 5-lbs of boost with zero problems - 375 rwhp, so that's a good choice for your current setup

Petza914 03-17-2019 12:54 PM


Originally Posted by 928sg (Post 15709742)
pull the plugs. if coolant is leaking into a cylinder, one plug will be "steam cleaned" and cleaner than the rest.

That's next on my list and I'll go from there.

GregBBRD 03-17-2019 02:27 PM

Allow engine to cool down.
Remove spark plugs.
If the problem is not obvious by looking at the spark plugs:
Install pressure tester.
Apply pressure to cooling system and allow it to leak down 2-3 times.
Have someone crank the engine over, while you observe the open spark plug holes.


Any sign of "Old Faithful" is bad.



​​​​​

dr bob 03-17-2019 03:13 PM

Pete --

If you don't already have one of those little bore-scope cameras with the webserver attached (typically <$30 on Amazon...) here's a great time to add one. Coolant in a cylinder will wash a plug, but that may or may no be obvious depending on how white they are in normal driving. The top of the piston, however, is an easy telltale for lots of combustion issues including detonation and coolant leaking. Both are of serious interest in your supercharged car. Coolant leaking into the cylinder will quickly steam-clean the piston tops to shiny metal, while the "normal" cylinders will have tan to dark grey deposits. Detonation offers a radial bloom from the common point of detonation, sometimes with what look like BB or ball-peen hammer impacts. Among the look with the camera, the plug inspection, a compression test and the coolant system pressure/leakdown test, you'll have enough hints to ID the failure and location.

If you don't have the schedule available for a DIY repair, your best option may be to have the car transported back to Carl for the whole reseal/refresh effort. That virtually eliminates possible issues with having all the supercharger bits go back on correctly. Carl mentioned in the electrical-fire thread that he's headed to Arkansas this spring with the race car and transporter. If he makes a right instead of a left on his way home, he'd wind up in Clemson to pick the car up. According to my from-the-farthest-corner-of-the-lower-48 nav skills anyway.

Petza914 03-17-2019 05:00 PM

How new a motor could I run with the rest of my current setup as a plug and play? Would a 4.7 L-Jet work and provide even more power or does it need to be a K-Jet whether US or Euro? Are the electrics the same like wiring harnesses and such?

Seems like if I'm pulling the motor anyway and then the heads and might have to machine the block and refurb the heads that I could do this same work to a different motor with other advantages, if there are some. Maybe upgrade the headers at the same time.

​​​​​

Wisconsin Joe 03-17-2019 05:25 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15709285)
Thanks for the quick responses guys.
  1. So if it is a small head leak, how critical is repairing it and how quickly?
  2. Will it do damage to the motor if the coolant isn't actually mixing with the oil and the little bit that's burning is just going out the exhaust?
  3. If it is leaking, could it fail catastrophically and hydro-lock the engine, like at a gas station, or will it continue to get progressively worse slowly?
  4. Could I boroscope through the spark plug holes to determine which cylinder(s) are leaking?
  5. Does this usually happen on one bank and is that the only one I'd need to fix or do I need to do both?

1 - Not super critical as long as it doesn't get worse.
2 - No. The coolant isn't actually burning, it's just vaporizing to steam and going out the exhaust pipe.
3 - Yes, it could. Maybe. Or maybe not.
4 - Maybe. If you see that the top of one piston (or maybe more than one) is clean, while the rest have the normal carbon, that would be a good indicator. As noted, pulling spark plugs which you'd have to do to do this, would likely tell you the exact same thing.
5 - Maybe one side, maybe both. See below.

You also asked if this can be done with the motor in the car. For a 16v motor, it's rather difficult to get the cam tower off with the motor in. Passenger side worse than driver. General rule for cam tower is that one can be done with motor in, but if you are doing both, it's easier to pull the motor. Not sure if getting the cam tower off gives enough room to get the head out 'easy'.
In this case, I would guess that you've 'failed' a HG. Coolant in the cylinder (coming out the exhaust) is a fairly definitive indicator.
As was noted, I hope you didn't warp your head(s) when you got it hot. Although that generally results in a more catastrophic HG failure.
The big question is whether or not you've damaged both HGs. And if one is still intact, is there damage that hasn't 'let go' yet? Did you weaken it enough that it will fail in the future. It would really, really suck to fix one side and then have the other fail in a few weeks.
Have the HGs been done in the past? Or are they original?

If they are original, I'd suggest biting the bullet, yanking the motor & replacing both HGs.
If they've been done fairly recently, that will be a tougher decision.

Standard disclaimer: My $0.02, worth what you paid for it, not a professional mechanic, didn't even sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night, use at own risk, close cover before striking, contains flammable gas under pressure. :)

Edit to add:


Originally Posted by DrBob
Carl mentioned in the electrical-fire thread that he's headed to Arkansas this spring with the race car and transporter. If he makes a right instead of a left on his way home, he'd wind up in Clemson to pick the car up. According to my from-the-farthest-corner-of-the-lower-48 nav skills anyway.

Nope. There's probably 600 miles or so of Tennessee & North Carolina in the way.

GregBBRD 03-17-2019 06:13 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15710205)
How new a motor could I run with the rest of my current setup as a plug and play? Would a 4.7 L-Jet work and provide even more power or does it need to be a K-Jet whether US or Euro? Are the electrics the same like wiring harnesses and such?

Seems like if I'm pulling the motor anyway and then the heads and might have to machine the block and refurb the heads that I could do this same work to a different motor with other advantages, if there are some. Maybe upgrade the headers at the same time.

​​​​​

Yes. Any engine that got as hot as you described is probably going to need more than just head gaskets:
The decision to drive it a "few more miles" was the exactly the same decision as pulling it out and attempting to rebuild it....even if you didn't recognize it, as such, right at that moment.

The "Fat Lady" has sang, left the building, gone home, and is already sleeping.

Any of the '78/'79 US engines are "plug and play", obviously. Any '78-'83 Euro engine is also "plug and play". (Although the odds of finding any '78-'83 engine that is good enough to just drop in and supercharge are very, very low.)
Every other engine will require modifications to the electrical and fuel system.

Petza914 03-17-2019 06:15 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15710323)
Yes. Any engine that got as hot as you described is probably going to need more than just head gaskets.

The decision to drive it a few more miles to the nearest Wallmart was the same as deciding to pull it out and attempt to rebuild it.

So Greg, how's your schedule?

GregBBRD 03-17-2019 10:13 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15710328)
So Greg, how's your schedule?

As always, very busy.

When trying to do things as perfect as possible....one "little snag" can set us back weeks.

Seems like everything we have seen for the last six months has multiple "little snags".

The reality of working on older cars is that we don't see many cars for routine service things....almost everything we do is something that no one else can figure out how to fix or some sort of major trauma.


928 GT R 03-18-2019 09:46 AM

So --- We skip the diagnostic steps entirely and simply jump to a GB rebuild?

Or --- new GB motor?

If you do not want to start it again, at least pull the plugs and report the findings. Photos would help create a reference.

Some of us want a confirmed diagnosis before ripping our motors out or apart... Geeezzzzzz


.

SwayBar 03-18-2019 10:06 AM

An LS engine would go perfect with your drivetrain!

Petza914 03-18-2019 10:14 AM


Originally Posted by 928 GT R (Post 15711273)
So --- We skip the diagnostic steps entirely and simply jump to a GB rebuild?

Or --- new GB motor?

If you do not want to start it again, at least pull the plugs and report the findings. Photos would help create a reference.

Some of us want a confirmed diagnosis before ripping our motors out or apart... Geeezzzzzz


.

Nah, we'll be doing all of that, hopefully this week - at least the pulling the plugs portion and boroscoping into the cylinders (I have a mobile phone boroscope, which probably isn't great, but should do).

Just trying to understand options providing the problem is what everyone including me thinks it probably is. Doesn't seem like there are too many ways to make a coolant cloud on start-up which never once happened prior to the overheating event, and has now happened twice in the same week. Same situation for that glug glug sound I hear on shutdown now, which I thought might be air trapped in the cooling system since I had refilled it, but now think it's coolant running into the head and the air it's displacing rising in the system.

There are a few things all pointing in the same direction, but will pull plugs to confirm and post what they look like.

In the event it is the head gaskets, if I found an M28/10 K-Jet motor (Euro), how.much of what I already have on my engine that is new and known good could move over to it, specifically the CIS fuel distributor, air sensor, WUR, crank pulley for the SC, 200 amp alternator, a/c, etc. I know the spider manifold and legs are different and larger on the Euro.

If I end up sourcing a new motor, does it matter if it was the version for a 5-speed manual or for an automatic (M28/10 vs M28/09 or M28/11 or M28/12)?

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 03-18-2019 10:44 AM

Hi Pete. Sorry about your problem. There is a kit that tests for combustion gases in the coolant system. I forget exactly how it works, but not too expensive and supposedly very sensitive.
Maybe this is the one I got.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 03-18-2019 10:55 AM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15711368)
Hi Pete. Sorry about your problem. There is a kit that tests for combustion gases in the coolant system. I forget exactly how it works, but not too expensive and supposedly very sensitive.
Maybe this is the one I got.
https://www.amazon.com/Block-Tester-...-2-spons&psc=1
Good luck,
Dave

Thanks Dave. Adding that to the test arsenal to help confirm the diagnosis. I'll try to pull plugs tonight and do the coolant test Thursday or Friday when I'm back home again.

BRB-83-911SC 03-18-2019 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15711318)
Nah, we'll be doing all of that, hopefully this week - at least the pulling the plugs portion and boroscoping into the cylinders (I have a mobile phone boroscope, which probably isn't great, but should do).

Just trying to understand options providing the problem is what everyone including me thinks it probably is. Doesn't seem like there are too many ways to make a coolant cloud on start-up which never once happened prior to the overheating event, and has now happened twice in the same week. Same situation for that glug glug sound I hear on shutdown now, which I thought might be air trapped in the cooling system since I had refilled it, but now think it's coolant running into the head and the air it's displacing rising in the system.
?

I just posted this in the other Head Gasket thread. At the beginning of my thread below, I describe the symptoms I encountered, which sound similar to yours. Further into the thread you can see the forensics of the gasket. I got lucky and didn't have any corrosion issues to deal with. It has been 7 years and 16k miles since, with no issues.

EDIT - my car never overheated, so the fact that yours did may present issues other than the gasket, as you know.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...s-back-on.html

Petza914 03-18-2019 11:42 AM


Originally Posted by BRB-83-911SC (Post 15711422)
I just posted this in the other Head Gasket thread. At the beginning of my thread below, I describe the symptoms I encountered, which sound similar to yours. Further into the thread you can see the forensics of the gasket. I got lucky and didn't have any corrosion issues to deal with. It has been 7 years and 16k miles since, with no issues.

EDIT - my car never overheated, so the fact that yours did may present issues other than the gasket, as you know.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...s-back-on.html

Yep, your symptoms actually sound identical to my current situation. Honestly, if it weren't for the cloud on startup after the coolant system pressure test, that also was a slower and rougher start, and then the 2nd cloud a few days later, the car has run fine and I wouldn't even know I had a problem.

karl ruiter 03-18-2019 06:16 PM

Rather than a full motor replacement, how about a just a set of Euro S heads? That would give you bigger valves, but allow you to use most of your setup as is.

Having done it both ways, I really recommend pulling the motor, even to replace a head or a cam carrier gasket. It is just not that hard of a pull, the overall work is less, and the quality of the end job is better.

Petza914 03-18-2019 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15712448)
Rather than a full motor replacement, how about a just a set of Euro S heads? That would give you bigger valves, but allow you to use most of your setup as is.

Having done it both ways, I really recommend pulling the motor, even to replace a head or a cam carrier gasket. It is just not that hard of a pull, the overall work is less, and the quality of the end job is better.

karl,

That's a great idea and I came to a similar conclusion earlier today. I have a pair of Euro heads from an M28/11 motor on hold that I will purchase if I have to remove mine to replace the head gaskets. I'll have them gone through and refurbished if they're pitted, then have a 3-angle valve-job and head restoration performed, then reinstall those on my motor. As you say, that will improve the breathing, and probably even more so with the supercharger. I'm probably going to add the rest of the Euro intake pieces as well - intake distributor (already have the legs), Flap Nozzle / throttle body to realize the full benefit and may renew the injectors while I'm doing all of that. This should be much easier than the motor swap, considering how packed the front of my engine bay is with the custom intake, radiator, and supercharger setup, and I don't have a lot of other while you're in there stuff to do since motor mounts are pretty new.

We'll see what tonight's spark plug pulls reveal. Ideally, there's not much coolant sitting in the cylinders as I'd like to be able to start the car one more time to put it on the lift and swap it with the 914 while I wait on parts, if that's the direction I go.

Petza914 03-18-2019 06:32 PM

Advice I'm getting on whether to pull the motor for this job or to do it with the engine in the car, since it's a 16v seems fairly evenly split, so I've added a poll to the thread so I can see how wide the overall distribution is. At this point I'm leaning toward doing it with the motor in the car, but the poll may sway my decision, and if I'm pulling the motor, that may change what I decide to do about repair or replace.

karl ruiter 03-18-2019 07:02 PM

If the Euro heads you have lined up don't work out I have a spare set somewhere in LA. Bought them many years ago just because and have never even unpacked them.

dr bob 03-18-2019 07:09 PM

Pete--

I voted to pull the motor for the headgaskets. Even though you added the unrealistic qualifier that this is the only thing you will do. There's No Such Thing as "just replacing the headgaskets" on a 16V motor. For all the things including the heads and such, engine in the stand is just so much easier than engine in the car. There have been more than a few "engine pull parties" that let the starving masses help out; supply pizza and suds after it's out, and two problems are easily solved at once.

--

Having larger Euro valves or intake runners is almost inconsequential with the supercharger. The limitations on the SC car are related to cylinder pressures & temperatures, and subsequent detonation. If the runners or valves are a little smaller, the boost pressure is raised with a pulley change to make up for it.

BC 03-18-2019 07:32 PM


Originally Posted by dr bob (Post 15710060)
Pete --

If you don't already have one of those little bore-scope cameras with the webserver attached (typically <$30 on Amazon...) here's a great time to add one. Coolant in a cylinder will wash a plug, but that may or may no be obvious depending on how white they are in normal driving. The top of the piston, however, is an easy telltale for lots of combustion issues including detonation and coolant leaking. Both are of serious interest in your supercharged car. Coolant leaking into the cylinder will quickly steam-clean the piston tops to shiny metal, while the "normal" cylinders will have tan to dark grey deposits. Detonation offers a radial bloom from the common point of detonation, sometimes with what look like BB or ball-peen hammer impacts. Among the look with the camera, the plug inspection, a compression test and the coolant system pressure/leakdown test, you'll have enough hints to ID the failure and location.

If you don't have the schedule available for a DIY repair, your best option may be to have the car transported back to Carl for the whole reseal/refresh effort. That virtually eliminates possible issues with having all the supercharger bits go back on correctly. Carl mentioned in the electrical-fire thread that he's headed to Arkansas this spring with the race car and transporter. If he makes a right instead of a left on his way home, he'd wind up in Clemson to pick the car up. According to my from-the-farthest-corner-of-the-lower-48 nav skills anyway.


+1. Visual in the cylinder is best if the plugs are not already wet.

GregBBRD 03-18-2019 07:46 PM

I voted the way we would do the job, in my shop, if I thought the engine was fine and I just had to remove the heads. (Like the survey said.) No question, leave the engine in the car, in that situation.

This engine, which got really damn hot, would come out of the car.....again, no question.
If the pistons and bores are not scuffed, it's because they are completely worn out.

GregBBRD 03-18-2019 07:49 PM


Originally Posted by dr bob (Post 15712597)

Having larger Euro valves or intake runners is almost inconsequential with the supercharger. The limitations on the SC car are related to cylinder pressures & temperatures, and subsequent detonation. If the runners or valves are a little smaller, the boost pressure is raised with a pulley change to make up for it.

Very true.

Petza914 03-18-2019 08:38 PM

After plug removal, the news looks to be as expected. #6 has coolant in the cylinder, probably #7 too and #2 and #3 are questionable too. Here are the photos so you can see for yourself and advise. Captions are below each photo


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ec490ccc7d.jpg
All Plugs



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e3e93b27e0.jpg
1-4



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b1d38cc2dc.jpg
5-8



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c9339afbc7.jpg
1-2



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...626b483b2f.jpg
3-4



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b2b167ab59.jpg
5-6



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71d1712f95.jpg
7-8




And here are the boroscope results. Plugs did not actually seem especially tight which is probably why even outside the motor and on the base of some of the plugs, you can see the burned coolant remnants. Photos are captions with the cylinder # and then a letter for each photo in that cylinder

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c74d66a546.jpg
1A



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7128dd64f8.jpg
1B



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...52d230ae64.jpg
2A



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8b41bfe545.jpg
2B



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e18a71db48.jpg
2C



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2aca0b927.jpg
3 - this one was do close to top of the stroke this was the only shot I could get



https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...68a95da2a7.jpg
4A



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8c8feab2db.jpg
4B



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4403cb40f5.jpg
5A



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ba0c1dd50a.jpg
5B



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b79610c61e.jpg
5C



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5cd2a32ffc.jpg
6A



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...64e962a5cb.jpg
6B



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c872d98f2b.jpg
6C



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6cfb21559d.jpg
7A



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...326b2ef651.jpg
7B



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9585567c77.jpg
7C



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3cdc6bc1e.jpg
8A



https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2fa35e8e79.jpg
8B


Based on these findings are we concerned about the rest of the health of the motor where the safer bet is to replace what was a solid motor that ran well with a rock-steady idle with a complete different engine? I don't want to go to the trouble of doing the heads only to fire it back up and find out the bearings, crank or something else are actually bad. I have driven it twice since the first coolant cloud and it seemed to run fine.

Next question - it's on the floor under my lift with the 914 above it. Looks like it's not going anywhere for a while. If I leave all the plugs out and loosen the coolant reservoir cap so it can't build pressure, can I turn it over to push any coolant out the plug holes, reinstall the plugs and then run it for 5 minutes in order to be able to swap these 2 cars around or am I going to have to do that by pushing it?

All advice welcome and appreciated. Thanks.

928 GT R 03-18-2019 08:57 PM

Awesome thread and documentation! Sorry I could not participate today (Mom suddenly in hospital).

Again much appreciation to everyone for sharing their thoughts and insight. It will be fun to see what Pete does with this engine given it resides in such a unique and special car. :cheers:

Enjoy!

polecat702 03-18-2019 09:47 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15712794)
After plug removal, the news looks to be as expected. #6 has coolant in the cylinder, probably #7 too and #2 and #3 are questionable too. Here are the photos so you can see for yourself and advise. Captions are below each photo


https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ec490ccc7d.jpg
All Plugs



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e3e93b27e0.jpg
1-4



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b1d38cc2dc.jpg
5-8



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c9339afbc7.jpg
1-2



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...626b483b2f.jpg
3-4



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b2b167ab59.jpg
5-6



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71d1712f95.jpg
7-8




And here are the boroscope results. Plugs did not actually seem especially tight which is probably why even outside the motor and on the base of some of the plugs, you can see the burned coolant remnants. Photos are captions with the cylinder # and then a letter for each photo in that cylinder

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c74d66a546.jpg
1A



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7128dd64f8.jpg
1B



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...52d230ae64.jpg
2A



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8b41bfe545.jpg
2B



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e18a71db48.jpg
2C



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2aca0b927.jpg
3 - this one was do close to top of the stroke this was the only shot I could get



https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...68a95da2a7.jpg
4A



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8c8feab2db.jpg
4B



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4403cb40f5.jpg
5A



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ba0c1dd50a.jpg
5B



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b79610c61e.jpg
5C



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5cd2a32ffc.jpg
6A



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...64e962a5cb.jpg
6B



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c872d98f2b.jpg
6C



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6cfb21559d.jpg
7A



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...326b2ef651.jpg
7B



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9585567c77.jpg
7C



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3cdc6bc1e.jpg
8A



https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2fa35e8e79.jpg
8B


Based on these findings are we concerned about the rest of the health of the motor where the safer bet is to replace what was a solid motor that ran well with a rock-steady idle with a complete different engine? I don't want to go to the trouble of doing the heads only to fire it back up and find out the bearings, crank or something else are actually bad. I have driven it twice since the first coolant cloud and it seemed to run fine.

Next question - it's on the floor under my lift with the 914 above it. Looks like it's not going anywhere for a while. If I leave all the plugs out and loosen the coolant reservoir cap so it can't build pressure, can I turn it over to push any coolant out the plug holes, reinstall the plugs and then run it for 5 minutes in order to be able to swap these 2 cars around or am I going to have to do that by pushing it?

All advice welcome and appreciated. Thanks.

Sure, why not, it's not like the cylinders are full of water. You're head gaskets are leaking, they haven't failed completely. That's just my opinion, it's a gamble but at this point it's reasonable.

GregBBRD 03-19-2019 12:00 AM

So, the outside of the spark plugs had water/coolant sitting around them....that's the corrosion on the metal. Note that this stain on the spark plugs is not coolant from the inside of the engine!

Is the coolant sitting on the top of the pistons from the inside of the engine, or did that run down the spark plug hole when you took the spark plugs out?

Crank the engine over, with the spark plugs out....several revolutions to "clear" out all the coolant that is currently in the engine.

With your bore scope, confirm all the coolant is gone.

Install the pressure tester and pump it up and let it leak down a few times. Recheck with the bore scope. If the coolant comes back, it's from the inside, not from the outside of the spark plugs.

BTW....those bores look pretty good, from what I can tell from your pictures.

I'm thinking remove the heads, from what I see in those pictures.


And yes, if you crank the engine over with the spark plugs out (blowing out the coolant from inside the cylinders), you can then install the spark plugs and start the engine to move things around. (No pressure on the cooling system, from your tester, but you can leave the tester on the tank.) Just don't shut it off, if it builds pressure in the cooling system....that will push coolant back into the cylinders.

Petza914 03-19-2019 12:24 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15713238)
So, the outside of the spark plugs had water/coolant sitting around them....that's the corrosion on the metal. Note that this stain on the spark plugs is not coolant from the inside of the engine!

Is the coolant sitting on the top of the pistons from the inside of the engine, or did that run down the spark plug hole when you took the spark plugs out?

Crank the engine over, with the spark plugs out....several revolutions to "clear" out all the coolant that is currently in the engine.

With your bore scope, confirm all the coolant is gone.

Install the pressure tester and pump it up and let it leak down a few times. Recheck with the bore scope. If the coolant comes back, it's from the inside, not from the outside of the spark plugs.

BTW....those bores look pretty good, from what I can tell from your pictures.

I'm thinking remove the heads, from what I see in those pictures.


And yes, if you crank the engine over with the spark plugs out (blowing out the coolant from inside the cylinders), you can then install the spark plugs and start the engine to move things around. (No pressure on the cooling system, from your tester, but you can leave the tester on the tank.) Just don't shut it off, if it builds pressure in the cooling system....that will push coolant back into the cylinders.

Greg, thanks for your continued input. Yes, I've never personally changed the plugs in this motor - was actually going to do that as part of the prep work for the upcoming 928 events (Mitty, SITM, PEC), but they were all pretty loose, like tensioned, but maybe 5-7 ft. lbs by feel so some of that coolant had made it's way out of the spark plug holes and corroded the metal on the outside of the plug itself. I put towels over both sides of the plug holes and cranked the motor over a few times - nothing came shooting out into the towels and it spun over just fine (sounds funny though with no compression - don't think I've ever done that in any motor before, almost like it's not even spinning).

I'm glad to hear your input on the condition of the bores. This motor seemed very good other than a few oil leaks - nice steady idle, smooth, etc and this project will be much more affordable if I only work it from the head perspective and not the complete motor replacement one if you think my odds are good to salvage what I have without tearing it apart. For a motor oil I run Driven DT50 synthetic which according to Lake Speed at Driven will support temperatures of up to 350 degrees for short periods, so maybe that was a contributor to not having more damage and the car seeming to run fine both during the event and now afterwards.

Sounds like you think I can start it and move it onto the lift once the cylinders are free of coolant while I figure out the best way to go.

Right now, I have a few options:
  1. a fully rebuilt M28/10 motor that would be bolt in ready, but is really way beyond my budget (thousands) so not really an option
  2. A pair of Euro heads from an M28/11 I could get for reasonable money, hen have renovated and a valve job done to them, install with new gaskets. I keep all my existing intake parts
  3. A different pair of Euro heads (don't know specific year yet) I could get for reasonable money, then have renovated and a valve job done to them, install with new gaskets.
  4. an 4.7 M28/19 complete built engine. One head mounting hole has been welded at a bolt hole, but tested. I either keep all my existing intake parts or also buy the L-Jet parts that were part of this same motor, but my K-Jet setup seems to be working so well, I'm afraid to go the electronic injection route.
  5. an 85/86 M28/43 5.0L block with M28/15 16v heads - a hybrid engine build. Pistons had the extra notching done to work with the 16v head

Which of these options seem good and which are not as good?

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 03-19-2019 03:00 AM

Sad news, Pete. I hope you can get it fixed soon.
Good luck,
Dave

SwayBar 03-19-2019 10:03 AM

If you score Euro heads, then also find some Euro cams too.
​​​​​​
They are more supercharger-friendly in that they'll lower the dynamic compression ratio of the engine, thus, help minimize detonation.

Classic failure mode of a supercharged engine is a blown head gasket, and usually caused by detonation.

Petza914 03-19-2019 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15713724)
If you score Euro heads, then also find some Euro cams too.
​​​​​​
They are more supercharger-friendly in that they'll lower the dynamic compression ratio of the engine, thus, help minimize detonation.

Classic failure mode of a supercharged engine is a blown head gasket, and usually caused by detonation.

Actually, it looks like my current compression ratio of my '79 US car is 8.5:1 and the lowest of all 928 motors, so should be as supercharger friendly as they come. In '80, the US cars moved compression to 9.0:1,and for the Euros to 10.0:1.

83/84 US cars were 9.3:1
84-86 Euros were the highest at 10.4:1
85-86 US cars were at 10.1:1
then everything after that, except the GTS was 10.0:1 with the GTS being slightly higher at 10.4:1

If I end up putting heads onto my block, I'm going to install them with upgraded gaskets from 928MS. If I end up installing the 4.7 rebuilt motor, I'm going to leave things assembled as they are and drop it in. That motor would have a compression ration of 9.3:1 which should be OK. Probably going to install new fuel injectors just to be save if I go that route, unless I also change over to the L-Jet fueling system that's available with that motor.

Any opinion on K-Jet vs L-Jet for supercharged setups - avoiding a computer and tuning manually with mixture seems easier.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 03-19-2019 01:42 PM

I would talk to Carl about L-jet vs K-jet. He has experience with both .
good luck
Dave

jeff spahn 03-19-2019 01:47 PM


Originally Posted by polecat702 (Post 15709268)
I had head gaskets blow on the exhaust valve side in my blower motors in the Pantera. It stopped when we O ringed the heads. I'd do a compression test on each cylinder. They don't always pop where you get water in the oil. I've seen them let go and the exhaust gasses push all the coolant out thru the cooling system. BTW, I got my radiator cap from Roger, and I believe it's a 13 pound cap. Also Greg Brown says the head gaskets on these cars are failing due to age related problems. My 89 is supercharged, and I'll be changing head gaskets as a precaution when I do the top end refresh.

Joe
Call me when you do that. I'd be happy to come out and help you pull the motor and do the heads. It's easier with extra sets of hands.

Petza914 03-19-2019 02:15 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15714321)
I would talk to Carl about L-jet vs K-jet. He has experience with both .
good luck
Dave

Just did.

He says the K-Jet is a better fueling platform for supercharging providing it's in good shape (which mine is), so I'll be staying with what I have on that, but probably installing with new injectors and seals just to be safe, and some braided stainless fuel lines I've found.

AirtekHVAC 03-19-2019 09:21 PM

Pete, sorry to hear all this, hope it works out, and I hope you can get it done before SITM

Petza914 03-19-2019 09:35 PM

I bought the recently rebuilt 4.7L M28/19 motor today from user BC for very reasonable money - thanks BC! It was previously in ladybug's car.

So that's the plan...pull the motor and replace it with this 4.7 and then reinstall my K-Jet setup and supercharger onto it. Also going to install new injectors and Greg Brown fuel lines.

The motor will be starting the trip my way from San Diego sometime next week and I'll start doing prep work on my car in the meantime as I've now made a decent list of stuff I am going to do.

Hoping I can get it all put together in time for SITM.

If there's a good 16v Engine Pulling for Dummies (Rookies) writeup with step by step instructions someone could point me to, that would be awesome.

I'll pull the heads from my current motor after I get everything else done and decide what to do with it.

polecat702 03-19-2019 11:49 PM


Originally Posted by jeff spahn (Post 15714329)
Joe
Call me when you do that. I'd be happy to come out and help you pull the motor and do the heads. It's easier with extra sets of hands.

Thanks Jeff!!!!! I'll wait till you're snow bound and want to hit Vale on the way out. I wanna do the engine after we run down to 3rd coast, this year. Yank the motor, and get it back in before I have Tommy, paint the car. I'll have everything ready to do a quick swap. I have spares for almost everything. Plus all the new parts will be here too.

We'll tool around in the Pantera this time too. Gotta start driving it.

BC 03-20-2019 09:03 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15715304)
I bought the recently rebuilt 4.7L M28/19 motor today from user BC for very reasonable money - thanks BC! It was previously in ladybug's car.

So that's the plan...pull the motor and replace it with this 4.7 and then reinstall my K-Jet setup and supercharger onto it. Also going to install new injectors and Greg Brown fuel lines.

The motor will be starting the trip my way from San Diego sometime next week and I'll start doing prep work on my car in the meantime as I've now made a decent list of stuff I am going to do.

Hoping I can get it all put together in time for SITM.

If there's a good 16v Engine Pulling for Dummies (Rookies) writeup with step by step instructions someone could point me to, that would be awesome.

I'll pull the heads from my current motor after I get everything else done and decide what to do with it.

The motor removal is the hard part. Putting it back in is super fun. I stole the pallet from Costco today so ON SCHEDULE!

Petza914 03-20-2019 09:31 PM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15717552)
The motor removal is the hard part. Putting it back in is super fun. I stole the pallet from Costco today so ON SCHEDULE!

Thanks BC !

karl ruiter 03-20-2019 09:35 PM

All easy stuff, especially on a CIS car.
Remove hood
Unhook exhaust
Pull fan and radiator
Unhook 14 pin electrical connector
Disconnect 2x fuel lines and throttle cable.
Disconnect driveline at clutch
Drop the clutch? (don't totally remember if I pull the clutch down or not. Probably makes the pull easier if you do as otherwise it has to come pretty far forward)
Bell housing bolts and motor mounts.
Pull baby pull.

WSM has a good write up, I think.

Petza914 03-20-2019 11:16 PM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15717634)
All easy stuff, especially on a CIS car.
Remove hood
Unhook exhaust
Pull fan and radiator
Unhook 14 pin electrical connector
Disconnect 2x fuel lines and throttle cable.
Disconnect driveline at clutch
Drop the clutch? (don't totally remember if I pull the clutch down or not. Probably makes the pull easier if you do as otherwise it has to come pretty far forward)
Bell housing bolts and motor mounts.
Pull baby pull.

WSM has a good write up, I think.

Thanks for the outline. I have the WSM and will look that up.

Does the hood really need to come off, or can you just disconnect the struts and make it more vertical or pad it lay it back toward the windshield.

I'm planning to put it on the lift so I can access things from above and below as need be, then roll it off the lift so I can get a cherry picker with leveler under it to lift the motor out.


j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 03-20-2019 11:22 PM

Hi Pete,
The hood comes off easily and one person can do it. I popped the struts, then laid blankets across the engine and fenders. Then I lowered the hood until almost closed, but I could still access the hinge bolts. Pull the bolts and walk around to the front of the car and lift the aluminum hood. Very easy, and the access is vast.
Good luck,
Dave

karl ruiter 03-21-2019 04:19 PM

Mark the position of the hood hinges with a sharpee. If you have fender service guards this would be a good time to use them as it is easy to bump the hood against a fender as you are lifting it, if you are doing it by your self.

SwayBar 03-21-2019 04:28 PM

Disconnect the engine at the torque-tube and bellhousing. Pull the engine with bellhousing attached.

Less is more at this stage.

Kevin in Atlanta 03-21-2019 05:10 PM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15719335)
Mark the position of the hood hinges with a sharpee. If you have fender service guards this would be a good time to use them as it is easy to bump the hood against a fender as you are lifting it, if you are doing it by your self.

I unbolt hood hinges and all.

Petza914 03-21-2019 05:59 PM

Thanks guys. Keep the tips coming.

My car has the Z06 6-speed if that effects any of this, like the bell housing suggestion.

Petza914 03-21-2019 09:32 PM

What spec (size, length, thread pitch, and grade) mounting bolts will I need to put the engine on a Sunex 8300 engine stand once I've pulled it?

Mrmerlin 03-21-2019 10:47 PM

Umm disconnect the bell housing from the engine, remove the rear trans mounts to cross member
and slide it back an inch or so,
Put a small block of wood under the TT at the small chassis cross memeber the TT will rest on it.
Then pull the engine up about 4 inches then slide it forward while lifting.
The bell housing will hit the chassis if its not removed from the engine .
NOTE if you have a clutch then also remove the clutch

SwayBar 03-22-2019 09:10 AM


Originally Posted by Mrmerlin (Post 15720221)
Umm disconnect the bell housing from the engine, remove the rear trans mounts to cross member
and slide it back an inch or so,
Put a small block of wood under the TT at the small chassis cross memeber the TT will rest on it.
Then pull the engine up about 4 inches then slide it forward while lifting.
The bell housing will hit the chassis if its not removed from the engine .
NOTE if you have a clutch then also remove the clutch

Sure, you can do it this way.

But we've removed/installed many engines bellhousing on, and it's far easier working on and setting up the clutch, and unistalling/installing the clutch-fork with the engine out.

The tricky part is removing/installing the torque tube bolts, but even that is easy enough, just need to be patient.

Kevin in Atlanta 03-22-2019 09:15 AM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15720744)
Sure, you can do it this way.

But we've removed/installed many engines bellhousing on, and it's far easier working on and setting up the clutch, and uninstalling/installing the clutch-fork with the engine out.

The tricky part is removing/installing the torque tube bolts, but even that is easy enough, just need to be patient.

Are there threads you can refer me to here with pictures? Just curious.

SwayBar 03-22-2019 10:53 AM

I don't know if there are any threads on it.

SwayBar 03-22-2019 11:02 AM

And along those lines, there is no need to drop the exhaust system. Simply zip-tie it in-place, and only remove the 'collector' bolts.

Engine will come right out with exhaust in place, and one less thing to hook-up afterwards.

SeanR 03-22-2019 11:04 AM

I've always found it easier to do it like Stan does. Unbolt the housing from the engine and leave it connected to the torque tube.

Kevin in Atlanta 03-22-2019 11:25 AM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 15720956)
I've always found it easier to do it like Stan does. Unbolt the housing from the engine and leave it connected to the torque tube.

That is only way I've done.

Petza914 03-22-2019 12:10 PM

OK, I'll do it that way and leave the bell-housing on the torque tube.

I'll be pulling the clutch pack anyway as I'm going to replace my spec friction discs with OEM ones to finally eliminate the grabbiness of the engagement that has bothered me since the beginning. My car does have the upgraded 80-83 dual disc clutch with intermediate plate and all that was new during the build, so just doing the friction discs which I already have on-hand.

Thanks.

SwayBar 03-22-2019 12:25 PM

By all means do what you think is best.

My comments are for 5-speeds only. I got sick and tired with wrestling with the clutch-fork and ball-cup bushing after dropping the engine back in. I had to use a crow-bar and large screwdriver to get the fork over the bushing.

Perhaps autos are easier.

Petza914 03-22-2019 12:38 PM

Mine's not an auto or a 5-speed (6-speed) so guess I'll pull the clutch pack and then see what looks easier. My plan is to get a Cherry picker with a balancer assembly so I can angle the motor as needed coming out, then level it off. I still need to search for the engine hoist attachment points to see how all of that is done once I get everything off and disconnected.

I sure am going to learn a lot about my 928 if nothing else - maybe even enough to get my son one when he's old enough, because after this whole process, I might have a spare motor if my current one is OK.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 03-22-2019 01:17 PM

Hi Pete,
There are a couple of things to do while the engine is out, that are difficult otherwise. One is the A/C line along the right fender. I'm sure there are others, and you should look around for them to save yourself grief.
Good luck,
Dave

linderpat 03-22-2019 02:54 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15721260)
Hi Pete,
There are a couple of things to do while the engine is out, that are difficult otherwise. .... I'm sure there are others, and you should look around for them to save yourself grief.
Good luck,
Dave

the infamous blue hose from the brake booster.

Petza914 03-27-2019 03:29 PM

Anyone have an old scrap square tooth timing belt they want to send me for the cost of postage. I want to cut it up. Looking to paint the non-running surfaces of my steel timing pulleys (cam, oil pump, crank, etc) and want to mask off the toothed portion with sections of an old belt during the process.

Also, anyone have scrap 3 bolt header flanges? I'm looking for 2 of them to make an adapter to go between the 85/86 round tube SS headers and my current stainless Y-Pipe and would prefer to not cut and weld either of those, unless someone actually has one of those adapter pieces around.

Thanks.

Petza914 03-27-2019 08:01 PM

Here we go.

Battery disconnected, hinge positions marked, and hood off. I'll work on disassembly and removal while the 4.7L is en route.

Sunex 8300 GB Engine stand is assembled (thanks for the recommendation in another thread Greg Brown), Harbor Freight Shop Hoist with pneumatic ram upgrade and balancer assembly is on hand to be put together. Waiting on some parts too.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...81a1f23bba.jpg


Petza914 03-27-2019 11:21 PM

Pretty productive first few hours
  • Crossbrace off
  • Fuel lines disconnected at the intake legs and intske removed
  • supercharger intertcooler deinstalled
  • Radiator and most of the coolant drained

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...78c88893d8.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...83b1bd8207.jpg

Chris Lockhart 03-28-2019 07:19 AM

Good progress Pete. Wish I could come help, but I'm swamped. I hope it goes fairly smooth.

SwayBar 03-28-2019 08:28 AM

Nice job so far.

Friendly tip - whenever you start to feel impatient while working on the car, put down the wrench and take a break.

skpyle 03-29-2019 03:37 AM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15734475)
Nice job so far.

Friendly tip - whenever you start to feel impatient while working on the car, put down the wrench and take a break.

Never more truer words have been spoken...

M. Requin 03-29-2019 08:35 AM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15734475)
Nice job so far.

Friendly tip - whenever you start to feel impatient while working on the car, put down the wrench and take a break.

Absolutely! Avoid the "last run" syndrome like the plague.

SeanR 03-29-2019 10:32 AM

Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.

Kevin in Atlanta 03-29-2019 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 15736996)
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.

I love mine! Mine came from Jegs. Made in China - everything is nowadays.

Petza914 03-29-2019 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 15736996)
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.

I'm impressed with it. Amazon had the best price with free shipping so that's where mine came from. I'm going to get a drip pan (but not the Sunex one that melts from exposure to fluids) for it and cut a hole at the right position for the center brace to come through. I also replaced 3 of the bolts with clevis pins and tension pins with the safety ring so I can fold it down without requiring any tools. Having not mounted a motor on it yet, it looks very well made, the crank turns nice an free. After doing some research, I went with this one because of the longer standoff lengths. Most of the other ones I found that I liked (the yellow Jegs one) had short standoffs and that was one of the complaints from the people who bought those.

You can actually see it folded down under the boat trailer in the coolant draining photo.

I'll let you know how it works with the motor mounted as I'm going to remove and reseal the oil pan and install a stud kit, so I'll be cranking it upside down once on the stand.

Petza914 03-29-2019 01:36 PM

What's the consensus on whether I should upgrade to the Porken tensioner while I'm doing all of this on a 16v motor if I have a functioning regular tensioner?

soontobered84 03-29-2019 04:53 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15737449)
What's the consensus on whether I should upgrade to the Porken tensioner while I'm doing all of this on a 16v motor if I have a functioning regular tensioner?

How difficult will it be to access your tensioner to retension after 1500 miles? How difficult is it to access your tensioner for anything with the extra apparatus you have installed at the front of your engine?

Petza914 03-29-2019 04:59 PM


Originally Posted by soontobered84 (Post 15737881)
How difficult will it be to access your tensioner to retension after 1500 miles? How difficult is it to access your tensioner for anything with the extra apparatus you have installed at the front of your engine?

Quite difficult.

Pulling the airbox is easy, but the supercharger, not so much.

With the Porken Tensioner, is it self-adjusting like a normal serpentine belt tensioner, so no break in or periodic adjustments, whereas the OEM one requires manual adjustment?

If so, there's my answer. Thanks and let me know.

soontobered84 03-29-2019 05:07 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15737901)
Quite difficult.

Pulling the airbox is easy, but the supercharger, not so much.

With the Porken Tensioner, is it self-adjusting like a normal serpentine belt tensioner, so no break in or periodic adjustments, whereas the OEM one requires manual adjustment?

If so, there's my answer. Thanks and let me know.

Self adjusts like a normal serpentine belt tensioner.
Somehow I thought you might lean that way if you needed to remove the supercharger to access the tensioner. :)

BC 03-29-2019 09:33 PM

I am sending tensioners Pete, but I was going to say I would strongly recommend the Ken's tensioner in this case.

Petza914 03-30-2019 08:22 AM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15738379)
I am sending tensioners Pete, but I was going to say I would strongly recommend the Ken's tensioner in this case.

Yep, I think that makes sense. Sent Roger a note last night.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 03-30-2019 10:00 AM

Hi Pete,
I have the Porkensioner also. It works just fine, and it's also possible to remove or release tension on it from below, with the supercharger in place. I needed to do that when I corrected a one-tooth error on my timing belt install.
Good luck,
Dave

SwayBar 03-30-2019 10:50 AM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 15736996)
Let us know what you think about that 8300GB stand. Been looking at one and after yesterday messing with this latest rebuilt engine I want one with a crank.

I prefer this one, much more sturdy with the two load-bearing legs:

Harbor Freight Engine Stand...

SeanR 03-30-2019 01:14 PM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15739107)
I prefer this one, much more sturdy with the two load-bearing legs:

Harbor Freight Engine Stand...

Got one of those, actually two and while they have worked for me in the past, I'm not a fan. The one I'm working on right now Cheap-o-that works at the house came with the engine I just completed and it's much, much sturdier than the one you posted and I've been using. Hated how my old ones wiggled around on the set pins. Guess I"m getting old, I want sturdy one with a crank so I don't have to muscle it around.

SwayBar 03-30-2019 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 15739380)
Got one of those, actually two and while they have worked for me in the past, I'm not a fan. The one I'm working on right now Cheap-o-that works at the house came with the engine I just completed and it's much, much sturdier than the one you posted and I've been using. Hated how my old ones wiggled around on the set pins. Guess I"m getting old, I want sturdy one with a crank so I don't have to muscle it around.

LOL, I've got the one you posted, and do not like it at all. Different strokes I guess, glad there's plenty of options.

Just out of curiosity, how can yours rated at 1,000 lbs be sturdier than mine rated at 2,000 lbs?

Mrmerlin 03-31-2019 09:05 AM

Pete You can get that adapter for the X pipe from Motorsport in Utah

Petza914 03-31-2019 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by Mrmerlin (Post 15740653)
Pete You can get that adapter for the X pipe from Motorsport in Utah

Thanks Stan. Mark Anderson pointed me in that direction last week and Dave is making me one. Should ship early next week.

The headers arrived yesterday too (thanks Jim).

Motor and related parts have been shipped too. I need to order some things from Mark and Roger, but in about a week, I'll be the hold-up and should have 90% of what I need on hand.

SeanR 03-31-2019 10:26 AM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15739656)
LOL, I've got the one you posted, and do not like it at all. Different strokes I guess, glad there's plenty of options.

Just out of curiosity, how can yours rated at 1,000 lbs be sturdier than mine rated at 2,000 lbs?

Read my post a little closer and you will have a better chance at understanding what I said.

SwayBar 03-31-2019 11:08 AM


Originally Posted by SeanR (Post 15740767)
Read my post a little closer and you will have a better chance at understanding what I said.

I did, apparently yours is old and worn out, whereas my pins are still tight after years of use.

Again, I have both, and their listed specs accurately reflect my experience with them. I had to put a jack under the engine's nose to help support the then-brand-new 1,000 lb capacity stand. For the 2,000 lb capacity stand, no additional support has ever been necessary. Because of this, I've never used the 1,000 lb stand again.

So, basing/making a recommendation using a worn-out piece of equipment as an example, is not exactly good advice.

The numbers do not lie for in-spec, brand-new engine stands - 2,000 lb capacity versus 1,000 capacity, and their numbers accurately reflect my experience with both of them.

jej3 04-01-2019 07:11 AM

Hey Pete - make sure you have the Harbor Freight engine hoist rated at 2 ton. The 1 ton doesn't really extend far enough. Good Luck!

Petza914 04-01-2019 09:01 AM


Originally Posted by jej3 (Post 15742639)
Hey Pete - make sure you have the Harbor Freight engine hoist rated at 2 ton. The 1 ton doesn't really extend far enough. Good Luck!

Thanks a lot for the tip. Luckily I bought the right one, as I assembled it last night. Also upgraded the ram to the dual hydraulic / pneumatic one like I did on my 20 Ton shop press. Bought the 2 Ton load leveler too so I can adjust the angle on the way out and back in.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a44d1cd712.jpg


Probably elementary questions, but how and where do I connect the lift chains to the motor once I'm ready to pull it and also how and with what bolts and where should it be attached to the standoffs on the engine stand.

Also, is there a good link to a complete write-up on waterpump replacement and cam timing setup? Though I'm not changing the waterpump, I'll need to do the rest of it for reassembly.on the 4.7L motor.

With JP's soccer games both days, I didn't get much done over the weekend, but hoping to make some progress during a couple evenings this week.

Thanks.

Majestic Moose 04-01-2019 11:14 AM

There should be lifting eyelets near cylinders 1 and 8 but being at opposing corners it is awkward even with a load leveler. I will try this method next time: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ft-points.html

I used this excellent water pump/timing belt guide: http://static.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Con...ber%202011.pdf

SeanR 04-01-2019 11:50 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Use this one and you will have no issues.

Petza914 04-01-2019 11:50 AM


Originally Posted by Majestic Moose (Post 15742981)
There should be lifting eyelets near cylinders 1 and 8 but being at opposing corners it is awkward even with a load leveler. I will try this method next time: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ft-points.html

I used this excellent water pump/timing belt guide: http://static.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Con...ber%202011.pdf

Thanks a lot. Just printed out my 200 page step by step manual. Will put it in a binder and set it on the workbench next to the car :)

Interesting idea from Kevin on the lifting points too - might need to get some steel angle iron and a couple large eye bolts at Lowe's today.

Kevin in Atlanta 04-01-2019 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by Majestic Moose (Post 15742981)
There should be lifting eyelets near cylinders 1 and 8 but being at opposing corners it is awkward even with a load leveler. I will try this method next time: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...ft-points.html

Thanks for the props. :-)

they worked great with the load leveler.

Pete, you want to borrow them?

Petza914 04-01-2019 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15743107)
Thanks for the props. :-)

they worked great with the load leveler.

Pete, you want to borrow them?

Sure if you can spare them for a while - if not, I'll just make a set since I'll need them twice (removal & reinstallation) and am probably going to be dressing up the 4.7 a bit once it arrives before installation (cam towers, pulleys, etc). I don't want to mess up anything you have going from a timing perspective as it seems like you're pulling or reinstalling a motor every couple weeks LOL

Let me know and I'll shoot you some $ for postage - don't think I'm headed towards Atlanta in the next couple weeks.

Kevin in Atlanta 04-01-2019 12:12 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15743160)
Sure if you can spare them for a while - if not, I'll just make a set since I'll need them twice (removal & reinstallation) and am probably going to be dressing up the 4.7 a bit once it arrives before installation (cam towers, pulleys, etc). I don't want to mess up anything you have going from a timing perspective as it seems like you're pulling or reinstalling a motor every couple weeks LOL

Let me know and I'll shoot you some $ for postage - don't think I'm headed towards Atlanta in the next couple weeks.

Boxed and ready to go. PM your address. They go out today.

Petza914 04-01-2019 12:23 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15743170)
Boxed and ready to go. PM your address. They go out today.

Awesome. Thanks so much. Address coming your way.

SwayBar 04-01-2019 07:46 PM

Excellent choice on both the hoist and leveler - lots of lifting-hp and stability, with plenty to spare.

Petza914 04-03-2019 07:10 PM

Progress continues

Supercharger removed, Power steering fluid drained, Radiator drained & removed

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ee114b3072.jpg

karl ruiter 04-03-2019 07:40 PM

That's the way. Just keep chipping away. Blower pulley will have to come off, of course. Motor has to come pretty far forward.

Petza914 04-03-2019 07:50 PM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15749281)
That's the way. Just keep chipping away. Blower pulley will have to come off, of course. Motor has to come pretty far forward.

Yep, waiting on a flywheel lock with my other parts from Roger so the motor doesn't turn backwards.

Plenty to do between now and then though - clutch pack, power steering lines, header to Y-Pipe bolts, etc etc etc

Tracked the motor shipment from BC today - already in GA so won't be long before I can start working on that.

BC 04-03-2019 08:45 PM

Did you get the separate box Pete? Hopefully the engine gets there in one piece. I was thinking about the starter bracket. If you are doing a lower clutch cover starter mount for an early car you will remove the flywheel and remove that starter bracket. I also included exhaust gaskets, timing back cover o-rings, and the belt we talked about in the box. It will be some work but you can do this.

The Cams you have available to you may be better than the 4.7L USA cams on the motor I sent.

Petza914 04-03-2019 09:11 PM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15749434)
Did you get the separate box Pete? Hopefully the engine gets there in one piece. I was thinking about the starter bracket. If you are doing a lower clutch cover starter mount for an early car you will remove the flywheel and remove that starter bracket. I also included exhaust gaskets, timing back cover o-rings, and the belt we talked about in the box. It will be some work but you can do this.

The Cams you have available to you may be better than the 4.7L USA cams on the motor I sent.

Thanks BC. No, no box yet, but I'm sure it will show up sometime this week.

I've got an combo setup so won't know what works for the flywheel and starter stuff until I get into it.

Z06 trans, 83 dual plate clutch, high-torque starter, etc.

Thanks for l the extra parts too. You all have been extremely helpful.

I decided not to do any of the Euro stuff in the interest of time and cost - maybe the next time :)

Petza914 04-04-2019 12:22 AM

Phase 2 tonight

Coolant drained from both sides of engine block - that was fun.

Starter and alternator removed (supercharger earlier today)

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3ac0bc612.jpg


Oil drained

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dcc9ad6fa9.jpg


More wiring disconnected

Headers unbolted from Y-Pipe

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...802620dbf3.jpg


Everything is so nasty under here with oil and crud, this may have been a blessing in disguise to finally get the engine (or an engine) sealed up properly and toss the drip tray. Probably the oil pump, cam covers, oil pan, and who knows what else.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0b0cdb235e.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8091cef320.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...bef2ff6573.jpg

Chris Lockhart 04-04-2019 07:31 AM

I like the turnbuckle on your AC compressor. Excellent simple strong adjustment.

Petza914 04-05-2019 12:07 PM

Quick update - engine delivery delayed until next week, which is fine. The transport company didn't have a lift-gate truck available today, and it's pouring, so trying to transfer it from a tractor trailer into the back of a pick-up, then use a shop hoist to get it into the garage would have been fun.

Still waiting on some hardware from Fastenal to be able to put the new motor on the Engine stand, and not having to work around it while I continue to work on getting the current motor out will be better.

Also, my box from Roger is shipping today so delivery Thursday of next week when I'm back from a trip should work out perfectly.

BC 04-05-2019 04:03 PM

Wow, that sucks. It says "Lift gate service" at delivery. These things are random sometimes. At least its close. Did you get the box though?

Petza914 04-05-2019 04:13 PM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15753580)
Wow, that sucks. It says "Lift gate service" at delivery. These things are random sometimes. At least its close. Did you get the box though?

It's OK, really. Less stuff in my way for this weekend's removal work and gives me a little more time to get the garage setup to have places for 2 engines out of the car and on the floor. Your 4.7 will go on the Sunex stand and I'll set the 4.5 on the skid once I get the 4.7 off.

Also gives me a chance to have the engine to stand mounting hardware on-hand that arrives at Fastenal on Monday.

No box yet - tracking shows it in Greensboro, NC with an exception for a train derailment that is delaying delivery - you can't make this stuff up :)

As long as it shows up by Wednesday of next week, should be totally fine.

BC 04-05-2019 04:42 PM

Jeebuz.

Petza914 04-07-2019 01:40 AM

Made some more progress today, but not as much as I would have liked, because I started cleaning things up a little as I was removing them - wiping down wiring of oil and grease, etc.

Removed A/C Compressor and tied it off to the side.

Removed Y-Pipe and Exhaust Heat Shield

Removed Clutch bottom housing cover and noticed that the clutch assembly (looks like maybe the flywheel teeth from the 1st picture below) had been coming in contact with it to some degree - this may have happened a while ago when the first intermediate plate cracked, but the grooves in the cover aren't covered with the same black friction disc dust, so seems more recent, but I would guess that would make a god-awful noise that I don't recall hearing.


https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6858df158d.jpg

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e5d1265985.jpg

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4af8a8bcdd.jpg


so I machined it down below the level of the grooves that existed so it won't contact there in the future. I couldn't figure out how it could be adjusted since the throwout bearing plate is held in a specific position by the two small bolts.


Also, should this T fastener be in the groove that it looks like it should be in?

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b65456bd56.jpg


I loosened both pinch bolts from the torque tube coupler, slid it back, and removed the 2 small fasteners from the throwout bearing plate.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dfff8494b5.jpg


I looked in the WSM and did an online search, but can't find definitive instructions on how the clutch pack is now removed at this point. I've read something about shims that need to be installed before taking the circumferential bolts loose

Also, do I need to not go any further with this part until I can put the flywheel lock on in order to break the crankshaft nut loose? I also have a hardware kit from Carl that has 3 U-shaped clips, 3 red head painted bolts, and 6 hardened bolts that is supposed to come in handy for this job as I'm changing my friction discs from the current SPEC ones back to OEM versions in order to smooth out the clutch engagement and make the car much more drivable in traffic and on hill starts. Currently the clutch is very grabby and you can't spin it against the flywheel at all without it creating driveline shudder - you either have to let it out very slowly with no throttle until it just starts to engage and then let it the rest of the way out very quickly, or you have to rev it up and dump it, but there's no middle ground, which I don't like, so fixing that as part of this project.

Other progress pics from today...


A/C Compressor removed and tied-off
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...49b49f7790.jpg



Starter Wires Cleaned up
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c39c192587.jpg



Y-Pipe and Heat Shield Removed
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...50e8ad2ef7.jpg



Also, my adapter flange from Dave Lomas at Motorsports SLC arrived today and the holes between the two flanges are clocked by about 1/3 hole. Is this what's needed for everything to properly line-up on the passenger side when installing the '85/'86 round tube SS headers onto a 16v engine or should the bolt holes be aligned? I'm going to clean-up the welds a little bit too before installing.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fd702164a8.jpg


Planning to tackle the mess that is the power steering pump tomorrow. I have a spare that came with the car I'll be installing when it goes back together. Going to fire up the ultrasonic parts washer tomorrow if I have time to start degreasing some of these nasty brackets (power steering pump bracket, clutch housing cover, A/C bracket, exhaust heat shield. etc.)

Wisconsin Joe 04-07-2019 06:16 PM

Clutch removal is simple. The shims are the "U shaped clips". They go under the rivets to hold them out a bit when you unbolt the pressure plate pack (PP Pack). The 'T shaped fastener' is supposed to be a round head rivet. And yes, it's supposed to be up a bit.

6 bolts hold the PP pack to the fly wheel. You have to rotate the motor to get to them, so don't lock it into place just yet.. Carl may have sent you new bolts, some folks don't like to reuse them. Not sure.

Once the bolts are out, just pull the short shaft back, out of the pilot bearing in the back of the crank. The PP pack will fall freely down. Don't drop it on your head.

The short shaft should pull out easily. If not, there's a problem. I had to deal with it and can walk you through it.

Mrmerlin 04-07-2019 07:57 PM

that is a funny looking adapter,
the holes look like they wont line up but,
they make these flanges on a special jig so they do line up perfectly,
weld cleanup is another story

Petza914 04-07-2019 08:36 PM

Thanks Stan and Joe.

Next question. How the heck do you get the pulley off the power steering pump once the lock nut is removed. Are the threads backwards or should counter clockwise rotation remove it.

I have a spare PS pump I'm going to install but it has a bent pulley so I need to swap the pulley from my messy one over to it.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...51c3ff0063.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-07-2019 09:31 PM

Hi Pete,
From your picture, there is a keyway on the pulley. I bet that using a puller will extract the pulley. BTW it looks like right-hand threads on the end of the shaft. I wish you the best of luck with your project.
Dave

Petza914 04-07-2019 11:40 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15757833)
Hi Pete,
From your picture, there is a keyway on the pulley. I bet that using a puller will extract the pulley. BTW it looks like right-hand threads on the end of the shaft. I wish you the best of luck with your project.
Dave

Yep, used a puller on it and after some coaxing, it released with a pop - was really on there. Did the other one too so should be able to put together one good power steering pump and one good pulley, although my spare PS pump was also pretty dirty. I'm wondering if there's a washers and seals kit to rebuild these so I'm sure they don't leak once I install one of them. If so, what is in that kit. Looks like they tend to leak from the large banjo fitting that has crush washers on both sides. Anywhere else?

Petza914 04-08-2019 12:04 AM

Power steering pump is off and I cleaned up a lot of the parts I removed - heat shields, brackets, etc and the spare set of timing pulleys I have.


https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...03db990808.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1131f0191c.jpg

Petza914 04-11-2019 05:11 PM

Was able to get more accomplished last night.

Pretty much finished removal of anything connected to the motor that needs to come off working from above the engine.

Power Stteering reservoir is out.
Coil is out
K-Jet system is removed

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...be05933500.jpg
Engine without K-Jet setup, PS Reservoir, & Coil



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7df00b726f.jpg
K-Jet Fueling Removed



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...35ece5e362.jpg
Nasty valley between the banks



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4c0ea9d936.jpg
color coded these plugs with wire ties and took a photo so I'd be able to put them back correctly since the plugs and the wiring all look the same

Petza914 04-11-2019 05:25 PM

Today, the new motor arrived and looks to be in good shape, though I haven't spun it upside down yet. BC did a very nice sealing and packaging job to keep the open ports sealed off.



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f5da4f6a20.jpg
I was able to lift the engine on the skid out of the bed of the pickup with the HF 2-Ton Hoist and pneumatic ram quite easily



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c65780273b.jpg
Used Kevin's mounting bracket setup for the water-pump - worked great. (THANKS Kevin !)



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...78dd528372.jpg
On the backside, I do not have the large studs or bolt holes for his other bracket, just some M6 ones that hold the K-Jet setup in place, and didn't think they would be strong enough, so just used his eye-bolt through this hole instead (OK to do it this way, or not for the next lift?)



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ae690994f3.jpg
Then used the leveler to get the engine horizontal to connect it up to the Sunex Engine Stand - worked like a charm. I had to pick it up with with very uneven chain lengths the way it was sitting on the pallet and why I had to run the leveler all the way over to the side to level it out, but it all worked. I'll pick it up from the stand evenly and use the leveler to angle it for installation into the car for the next part.


I followed some advice I found on here about mounting it on the stand lower than aligning the crank with the rotational access of the stand, which should keep the center of gravity lower when it rolls over the top.

Going to try and finish the work under the car with the old motor tonight, then leave it there until this one is ready to go in so I don't lose more garage space. I plan to do some work on this new motor before installation, like installing a new oil pan gasket and stud kit, powdercoating the cam tower covers and some other parts, etc.

BC 04-11-2019 05:57 PM

OK, I am super glad it is there in one piece. I had some dreams about the straps coming off....

I would strongly recommend redoing the pan gasket, as they always need to be redone. With the sitting, I would just assume. Free flywheel! lol. Take that off, so you can get to the starter bracket, and get that off, I would also say.

I put several squirts of fresh oil in the spark plug holes, so when you turn it upside down, it will leak out.

Petza914 04-11-2019 11:00 PM

To remove these cam covers or valve covers for cleanup and powdercoat, do I just remove the 6 top caps so I can access the bolts under them and also the 9 lower socket cap bolts and then lift off (or tap off) the covers?

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...64ba2c30b0.jpg


What surprises await me under there and if it's going to be a couple weeks before they go back on, do I just cover what's underneath them with plastic bags?

Mrmerlin 04-11-2019 11:18 PM

When you remove the bolts for the cam towers be aware that the cam followers can slide out of their bores and fall on the ground

Petza914 04-12-2019 01:52 AM


Originally Posted by Mrmerlin (Post 15768009)
When you remove the bolts for the cam towers be aware that the cam followers can slide out of their bores and fall on the ground

Stan, well that sounds fun....

So how do you prevent that from happening, or is in not really preventable, and what's the best thing to do after? Do you put them back in and then use some blue tape across the tops to hold them in place, should you just remove them, and put them into individual baggies labelled for each cylinder, or something else.

I see some evidence of wetness on these valve covers on the new motor and have new gaskets from Roger already on hand. With this motor, I want to resolve all the oil leaks before it goes in so I don't have to deal with the mess I have with the current motor whenever I need to work on it.

Petza914 04-12-2019 02:03 AM

Tonight I:

Locked the flywheel and broke the crankshaft bolt loose. Now I'll be able to remove the clutch and bell housing to separate that from the motor (probably tomorrow)

Finished removing the power steering hoses as new versions of them are going in when the car goes back together

Removed the plastic timing belt covers - all but one is cracked, so probably going to replace them as well. Belt and pulleys are pretty nasty from the oil leaks


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5498511019.jpg
4.7 Liter on the Sunex stand with drip tray underneath. More parts to wash tomorrow.




https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8640fba345.jpg
Flywheel Lock Tool in use...




https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...16df68a4f0.jpg
...to break the crankshaft bolt loose




https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1eb9b13916.jpg
Timing Belt covers removed - pretty messy in there

Chris Lockhart 04-12-2019 10:20 AM

Looking good Pete!

BC 04-12-2019 03:31 PM

Couple things -

I think I have plastic covers somewhere. If you want them, and then if I can find them, they are yours for shipping.

The cam towers always leak. There is oil on them on this engine, however, because they were covered when I turned the engine over after I put oil in the spark plug holes. Mistake.
So they were dry before that. That said, its good insurance.

Plus, as I mentioned, I think you should use your 78/79 cams.

karl ruiter 04-12-2019 03:40 PM

If you do pull the cam towers Mr Brown makes improved cam tower gaskets. They would be worth it if they were expensive but they are stupid cheap.

Petza914 04-12-2019 04:15 PM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15769391)
Couple things -

I think I have plastic covers somewhere. If you want them, and then if I can find them, they are yours for shipping.

The cam towers always leak. There is oil on them on this engine, however, because they were covered when I turned the engine over after I put oil in the spark plug holes. Mistake.
So they were dry before that. That said, its good insurance.

Plus, as I mentioned, I think you should use your 78/79 cams.

Brendan,

Yes, if you have unbroken plastic cam timing covers, I'll take them. The only good one I have is outer top left. I need and all the other ones, including inner left and right. Can you email me pictures of the ones you have?

Why do you say to reuse my cams? My plan was to pull the cam towers but not to remove the heads. Do you think there's an issue with the cams?

Petza914 04-12-2019 04:18 PM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15769411)
If you do pull the cam towers Mr Brown makes improved cam tower gaskets. They would be worth it if they were expensive but they are stupid cheap.

Bought a pair from Roger and am assuming that's what he sent since I'm also doing all GB's fuel and clutch line.

Are these the good ones?
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...18a0a05013.jpg

BC 04-12-2019 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15769492)
Brendan,

Yes, if you have unbroken plastic cam timing covers, I'll take them. The only good one I have is outer top left. I need and all the other ones, including inner left and right. Can you email me pictures of the ones you have?

Why do you say to reuse my cams? My plan was to pull the cam towers but not to remove the heads. Do you think there's an issue with the cams?

You don't remove the heads. You don't have to change anything except if you wanted to the cams have higher lift or more duration on the 78/79 cams. And they just are in the cam boxes.

Petza914 04-12-2019 05:29 PM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15769529)
You don't remove the heads. You don't have to change anything except if you wanted to the cams have higher lift or more duration on the 78/79 cams. And they just are in the cam boxes.

Interesting. I didn't know the regular 78/79 cams had higher lift and duration. I knew the Euros were different, but not the ROW versions. If that's the case, that might be worth doing now that you mention it. Do you happen to know the specs for the cams on both versions?

Petza914 04-13-2019 12:43 AM

Pulled the Clutch Pack today and washed more parts. Once I get the car back together and drive it with the OEM friction discs, I'll probably put this pair of SPEC friction discs up for sale so someone who needs more aggressive clutch grip can get a deal on them.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...db9e26e0ab.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1815a7e8f6.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6984fd2099.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a86775147b.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2c84a9c687.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff20af88c6.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4682e72e40.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...682cc5383b.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9bb0f455a8.jpg

Petza914 04-13-2019 01:23 AM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15769529)
You don't remove the heads. You don't have to change anything except if you wanted to the cams have higher lift or more duration on the 78/79 cams. And they just are in the cam boxes.

Found this very interesting thread on that exact subject, with all the cam specifications, so that's a great tip and what I'll plan to do.

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...cam-specs.html

I'm guessing this setup is going to make a significant difference. I'll be moving the compression ratio from 8.5:1 to 9.3:1, increasing the displacement slightly from 4.5L to 4.7L and then if I use my '79 cams, combining those changes with increased lift and duration, this might turn out to be a decent HP & torque bump, especially with the supercharger, which I also recently upgraded. I'm getting kind of excited about this whole thing now, though I'm most excited about not having oil and power steering fluid all over my motor and the garage floor.

GregBBRD 04-13-2019 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15769499)
Bought a pair from Roger and am assuming that's what he sent since I'm also doing all GB's fuel and clutch line.

Are these the good ones?
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...18a0a05013.jpg

Yes.

Those will never leak, if you read and follow the instructions provided with them.

Petza914 04-13-2019 06:00 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15771694)
Yes.

Those will never leak, if you read and follow the instructions provided with them.

Looking forward to that.

No instructions included.

You have a PDF you can attach here or email to me at petza914@gmail.com.

Thanks.

GregBBRD 04-13-2019 07:38 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15771699)
Looking forward to that.

No instructions included.

You have a PDF you can attach here or email to me at petza914@gmail.com.

Thanks.

Common issue.

I have instructions for every single thing I sell.

Petza914 04-15-2019 12:36 PM

I have instructions that have me dropping the steering rack to access the motor mount bolts, but those bolts look like they're just securing this bracket that is then secured to the motor by 4 bolts - 2 on each side.

Can I just undo these 4 bolts to free the motor and not mess with the sway bar or steering rack?

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5d48614954.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5dfed36bc1.jpg

Chris Lockhart 04-15-2019 02:39 PM

To pull the engine, yes. That's how I removed and installed my S4 engine. Not sure on the 16 valve engines, but on the 32 valve after you remove the bell housing to engine bolts, you loosen the 2 transaxle mount bolts and slide it back about 1/2" or so and it gives you more room to get the engine loose from the bell housing and remove the engine.

karl ruiter 04-15-2019 04:25 PM

I don't recall exactly, but I think it may be difficult the get the engine high enough to clear the mounts if you leave them on the cross brace.

soontobered84 04-16-2019 12:04 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15774913)
I have instructions that have me dropping the steering rack to access the motor mount bolts, but those bolts look like they're just securing this bracket that is then secured to the motor by 4 bolts - 2 on each side.

Can I just undo these 4 bolts to free the motor and not mess with the sway bar or steering rack?

Aren't there 4 bolts(2 long and 2 short)for each motor mount on each side? 8 total bolts. Or is that later model motors mounts only?

karl ruiter 04-16-2019 03:35 PM

Hmmm. Looking again now those are not the stock early car motor mounts and that looks like the modified cross brace with removable center section. So, not sure what your best procedure will be. I will say, though, that I do not feel like the early mounts hold up, so you are in a good position in that respect.

Kevin in Atlanta 04-16-2019 03:59 PM

I thought the point of the removable center was to pull the engine without disconnecting the motor mounts, right?

soontobered84 04-16-2019 05:30 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15778051)
I thought the point of the removable center was to pull the engine without disconnecting the motor mounts, right?

I thought the point of the removable cross member center was to allow access to the motor mounts and bottom of the engine stuff without having to screw with the suspension mounts.

Kevin in Atlanta 04-16-2019 05:42 PM

I researched this and the benefit is access to oil pan , oil pan gasket and rod bearings.

Carl Fausett 04-16-2019 06:17 PM

I recognize that 3-piece cross-member as one of ours. We do not make that product anymore. After you have lowered the steering rack, you can remove the 4 allen-head bolts and drop out the center section, making oil pan removal very simple without messing with your suspension or changing the front end alignment. It was great for racers who like to slip in a new set of rod bearings from the bottom after each season or two :)

Won't help you any during an engine removal. Leave it assembled as-is and follow regular instructions for engine R&R. Remember, your motor mounts are late-model style, not the 78/79 style. That conversion took place when the 3-piece cross member went in.

Petza914 04-16-2019 07:23 PM

Right, those are the solid rubber motor mounts.

It still looks like there are 4 large bolts that will allow the motor to come out without messing with the steering stuff at all or the motor mounts either. The mounts seem to be attached to some brackets and then those brackets are attached to the motor by the 4 bolts.

Maybe not, and I'll look again tomorrow.

Petza914 04-18-2019 12:31 AM

Pulled the Cam Towers from the New Motor today to get them cleaned up (90 degree razor blade method then the parts washer) and have everything put together to go off to powdercoat. Even managed to get both sides off without dropping any of the cam followers / lifters. The motor looks to be in very nice shape below the cam towers - surfaces look good without pitting. I'll take a look inside the cylinders with a boroscope before I put things together.

Here's today's photo set

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f763028bcb.jpg
Cam Tower From End with Cap



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...de57989616.jpg
Both Cam Towers - Followers removed and stored safely - before the surfaces were cleaned up



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5b01045745.jpg
Cams out - planning to use the ones from my old motor instead for better lift & duration



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b3073643e0.jpg
Engine with cam towers removed - you can see the flecks of old gasket material that was scraped off in the catch tray



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6a4c12785c.jpg
Close-up of Engine on stand (other side) with cam tower removed



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4f1e9546eb.jpg
Once I finished all of that - reconfigured the garage for summer - boat is out and lift moved to the other bay for later trailer storage. Now I don't have to move the 914 out in order to be able to lower the 928 for ground work. Now that the engine is open with the cam towers removed, I bagged it to keep pollen and other contaminants out of it until the parts come back from powdercoat and I can put it back together and seal it up again.



https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2341cd3804.png

Here's the Blackstone UOA Report after the blown head gasket and overheating event. Other than the presence of coolant, this is one of the best reports on this motor, so it doesn't look like any damage was done to the internals as there weren't any wear metals in the oil. Hoping when I pull the cams that the lobes looks good without any hot-spots and that I can put those into the new motor when the towers come back from powdercoat.


Should be 1.5-2 weeks before I have the parts back so I'll do some of the work to the engine that needs to be done - replace the oil pan gasket and install the stud kit, reseal the oil pump, and then I'll work on pulling the old motor and cleaning up the engine bay now that I have some additional floor space in the shop where I can set the old motor on the skid the new motor arrived on.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-18-2019 10:42 PM

Pete, you are a real stud! Keep up the great work!! Now you'll have a spare engine?
Thanks for sharing,
Dave

Petza914 04-18-2019 11:30 PM

Dave,

Thanks a lot. Yes, when all is said and done I'll have a spare 4.5L long block with cams from a 4.7L - no fueling and some other missing parts, but essentially a spare engine if I decide to keep it.

Today I mostly worked on getting the boat ready for the summer since it was a sunny day, but found some time to start polishing my stainless Y-pipe. Also planning to do the 85/86 round tube headers I bought. Not going as quickly as I'd liked, but also not too bad. It's taking a while to get all the burned oil and grease off the front sections - the rear straight pipe went pretty quick. I have a bit more to do on this side and then will flip it over to do the other one.

Supposed to rain tomorrow, so I might decide to pull the motor so I can start cleaning up the engine bay. Parts also get dropped off at the powdercoater tomorrow.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e502b6c724.jpg
At the start


https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...183ebde23d.jpg
Passenger Side Partly done


https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c805ae6e89.jpg
Passenger Side and straight section mostly done

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-18-2019 11:33 PM

Very nice. I have the same Y-pipe, not polished.
Thanks again,
Dave

Petza914 04-18-2019 11:38 PM

Here's the next question.

I have flywheels on both engines and will need to use the good one from my blown motor on the new motor, but now don't have clutches attached to either engine so no teeth to put a flywheel lock onto. What's the best way to free the flywheel bolts without the motor turning backwards. Actually, in thinking more about this...because we talk about turning the motor clockwise only, and that's from the crankshaft bolt perspective, correct, that means at the opposite end of the engine where the flywheel is located, the counter-clockwise rotational force used to remove a bolt would actually be turning the motor in the proper direction, correct?

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...73e86bf103.jpg


If I need to keep it from rotating at all, I figured I could put a proper size spline socket on a breaker bar into one bolt that I'm not trying to remove to be able to hold it against the direction that the impact gun would generate on the bolt I am trying to remove. When I get to the last one, I could thread 2 of the previously removed bolts part of the way back in and use a prybar between them, while I undo the last bolt with the impact gun - would that method work and not do any damage?

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-18-2019 11:43 PM

Your rattle gun and counter-hold method is exactly what I was thinking.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 04-19-2019 01:33 PM

Impact gun and counter-hold method worked great on the new engine that's on the stand. There's not enough space for the impact gun in the bell housing to do that one while it's in the car so I'll remove it once the engine is out and sitting on a pallet.

Then I went to remove the starter mounting bracket from the new motor. The 13mm bolts came out easily enough - the other 2 not so much. Finally got one of them using a propane torch to heat it up and then a manual impact hammer to knock it loose and finally the air gun to spin it out, but the other one wasn't having any of that.

Eventually broke off the tip of a hardened screw extractor in the center of the bolt which put an end to that method - I honestly don't know why I try those things - they hardly ever work, and usually just snap off.

After cutting a flat slot into the bolt head and trying the manual impact hammer method to no avail (it did bend the the head of the straight impact bit though), I decided to cut the bracket away from the bolt since I don't need it anyway - my hi-torque starter mounts to the lower bell housing.

Very carefully using a dremel and an air grinder, I cut the bracket in half at the bolt head and once it was gone used some vice grips to unscrew the bolt.

That was fun.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...16e552f607.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...29b4bb920f.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6a8b9c4734.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f2e2691d8a.jpg

Majestic Moose 04-19-2019 03:05 PM

You can stop the flywheel turning with wire.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a9f68e9783.jpg

Mrmerlin 04-20-2019 09:46 AM

Crafty Alex

Petza914 04-20-2019 09:53 PM

Motor is OUT
 
Big Day Today. The 4.5L is out!

Now I'm starting to clean up and swap parts from one to the other and to clean up the engine bay. Took about 2 hours to clean all the greasy dirt off the engine cross-member.

My removal method did work though. Left the motor mounts in place and took the 4 main bolts from the motor brackets out that attach to the motor mounts. Not sure this is much easier than dropping the rack to remove the lower motor mounts though, because you have to lift the motor higher to clear them, I think, and I ended up dropping the rack anyway to clean everything and am going to repaint the support plate under the rack too.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9dc154f5b0.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...034c0fa56f.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...01b66d77a0.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a1ba62a3ca.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c91465e6a7.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-20-2019 10:25 PM

Hi Pete,
You are amazing. The work you do is great!
Thanks for sharing,
Dave

Petza914 04-20-2019 11:13 PM

Next question for the collective knowledge base.

When pulling the motor today I noticed the cam tower covers, plugs, and the end caps are different between the two motors.

Here's the end cap on the cam towers from my current 4.5L engine.
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b30c345268.jpg

and here's the end cap from the 4.7L engine
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ad558d605a.jpg


Since I'm planning to reuse my 4.5L cams in my 4.7L engine because of the higher lift and longer duration, here are the questions:
  1. Will the 4.5L cams fit properly into the 4.7L cam towers with the 4.7L cam tower caps, or
  2. Do I need to use the end caps from the 4.5L cam towers with the 4.7L cam towers, or
  3. Do I need to reuse the 4.5L cam towers complete and if so, do they just bolt onto the heads of the 4.7L engine, or
  4. Is there some other magic combination I need to do between these parts to have it go together correctly?
  5. Also, which cam followers/lifters should I use - the ones that came out of the 4.7L head if the 4.5L cams are being used with those, or the ones that were working with the 4.5L cams in the current engine, or does it not matter and just use the ones that look to be in better condition?

Thanks.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-21-2019 10:39 PM

Hi Pete,
I'm sure there are a few things to do with the engine out, but there is an a/c line that runs along the passenger fender side of the engine compartment. I think it goes from expansion valve to condenser? It's very difficult to change this line with the engine in place. Something to consider.,
Dave
Great work

Petza914 04-22-2019 12:46 AM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15789954)
Hi Pete,
I'm sure there are a few things to do with the engine out, but there is an a/c line that runs along the passenger fender side of the engine compartment. I think it goes from expansion valve to condenser? It's very difficult to change this line with the engine in place. Something to consider.,
Dave
Great work

Other than the hard lines, I think all of these were new 2 years ago

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9911c71147.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6ec62f1c7c.jpg

Carl Fausett 04-22-2019 10:30 AM

Pete - opt for the cam tower from the 4.7L motor. The rubber plugs from the early motor are hard to find and pricey, and they often leak. The other cam towers will have nice threaded plugs and crush rings. Much better. Consider it an upgrade.

Petza914 04-22-2019 11:35 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15790569)
Pete - opt for the cam tower from the 4.7L motor. The rubber plugs from the early motor are hard to find and pricey, and they often leak. The other cam towers will have nice threaded plugs and crush rings. Much better. Consider it an upgrade.

Carl,

Thanks for following along and chiming in. I came to that same conclusion last night. Having already taken the cam towers and end caps from the 4.7L to the powdercoater, I got concerned about whether I could just put the 4.5L cams into those cam towers, so last night, pulled the cam towers and cams from the 4.5L motor. When I layed them side by side, everthing lined up so I determined there wasn't anything special about the cam tower design of the 4.5L that would make those cams only work in those towers. Upon inspecting the cam lobes themselves, the 4.5L cams actually look to be in better shape too - less dark discoloration on the lobes.

The question I have now is should I use the followers/lifters that were in the 4.7L motor with the 4.5L cams or use the lifters from the 4.5L cam with the 4.5L cam in the 4.7L towers? The lifters out of the 4.7L look like they might be slightly better/newer as the underside is still a nice dark bronze color whereas the ones from the 4.5L have faded. Tops and sides all look to be about the same - no pitting, uniform scuff marks from use, etc.

Here's last night's photo set so you can see what the 4.5L towers and heads looked like, the lifter sets side by side, etc.


Pulled the lightweight SPEC flywheel from the 4.5L motor to remount onto the 4.7. Remember when I pulled the lower bell housing for the clutch and found what looked liked interference damage - think I discovered the cause of that - look at the outer ring of bolts on the backside of the flywheel - threaded part has been ground even with the nuts and the edges / faces of a few of the nuts have also been "shaved". When I removed the bell housing, I created some clearance in the area where that damage was - would you guys reinstall the lightweight flywheel or should I clean up the one that came on the 4.7L motor and use that one instead?


Reminder of what the lower clutch housing damage looked like
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6e3e2e997b.jpg


Note the outer circumference of bolts that are ground smooth. Looks to me like there was interference between them and someone ground down the bolt heads and machined some clearance into the housing cover. Had this happened naturally, the damage to the bell housing would have been in a constant arc where the bolt heads spun through it, not in a vertical pattern as shown.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...168b3db9db.jpg


There is also some deformity to the metal on the flywheel contact ring on the inner circumference, which I can clean up with a grinding wheel.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5be80862f7.jpg


Here's the heavier flywheel that came on the 4.7L motor
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...76fb6f04f2.jpg


,,,so would you guys clean up and use the OEM flywheel from the 4.7L motor or will I not like the way the car feels now that I've been driving it with the lightweight flywheel and gotten used to the freer-revving nature? Will it feel lethargic with the heavier flywheel?



Next, I pulled the cam towers from the 4.5L motor to compare it's cams to those from the 4.7L motor since the difference in end-cap had me concerned that I might need to reuse the 4.5L cam towers with it's cams and that they wouldn't just slide in and work right in the 4.7L towers.


https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2c22bc2632.jpg
4.5L cam tower end cap (thicker and domed for some reason)


https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f68b954bd3.jpg
4.7L cam tower end cap (thinner and flatter)



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cb6c27a954.jpg
First I set the motor at TDC



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7da1c2e737.jpg
1-4 TDC mark aligned (or pretty close to it)



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1961d263e6.jpg
5-8 TDC mark aligned



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...425ce8925a.jpg
Front view of 4.5L before things start coming apart. Tensioner had lateral play in it - normal or not? Doesn't matter as I'm replacing that one with one of Ken's on reassembly.



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...506835a734.jpg
1-4 Cam Tower. Interesting design compared to the 4.7L one. In the 4.5L, the lifters ride in these guide pairs that have flat sides where they meet each other. In the 4.7L, the lifters just ride in machined bores in the tower.



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9401955e15.jpg
Is the Dark Brown sludge normal? The 4.7L didn't look like this when I took it apart.



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...134e08cf4f.jpg
1-4 cam side of Head


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d10675e33c.jpg
1-4 4.5L cam on towel / 4.7L cam on bubble wrap. The 4.5L cam actually looks to be in better shape to me - what do you guys think?



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...316b23987c.jpg
4.5L on towel / 4.7L on bubble wrap



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...beb05881f0.jpg
4.5L on towel / 4.7L on bubble wrap. 4.7 looks like is has some lobe wear or hot spots.



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c06d4094ac.jpg
4.5L on towel / 4.7L on bubble wrap. 4.7 looks like is has some lobe wear or hot spots.



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d76f7334be.jpg
1-4 4.5L lifters out, organized, and stored



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...78f4a89abd.jpg
5-8 4.5L Cam Tower



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7eb544cc5b.jpg
5-8 4.5L Camshaft



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d8e1f71a9e.jpg
4.7L Lifters on the Left / 4.5L on the right. Which should I reuse during reassembly. The bronze color on the 4.7s looks fresher, but if the lifter should stay with the cam lobe it was paired with before the other shiny sides are comparable between the 2 sets.


Any opinions, input, or guidance is welcomed. Thanks.

Carl Fausett 04-22-2019 01:48 PM

About your flywheel: That a light-weight aluminum flywheel, and it allows the engine to rev faster because it stores less kinetic energy than a heavier flywheel.
The moment of polar inertia is lower – so the torque the engine makes is immediately available to the tires, rather than having to overcome the mass of the flywheel first before it can turn the tires.

That said: it’s a double-edged sword. Because it stores less energy; it also is a little harder come away from stop signs without chugging, requiring more throttle in order to replace the weight it doesn't have.

You may be happier with the stock flywheel from the 4.7 motor. You aren't racing, and you know know what clutch chatter is. I noted you are also replacing the SPEC friction material with stock friction disks,
that will also make for smoother launches.

Petza914 04-22-2019 02:09 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15791094)
About your flywheel: That a light-weight aluminum flywheel, and it allows the engine to rev faster because it stores less kinetic energy than a heavier flywheel.
The moment of polar inertia is lower – so the torque the engine makes is immediately available to the tires, rather than having to overcome the mass of the flywheel first before it can turn the tires.

That said: it’s a double-edged sword. Because it stores less energy; it also is a little harder come away from stop signs without chugging, requiring more throttle in order to replace the weight it doesn't have.

You may be happier with the stock flywheel from the 4.7 motor. You aren't racing, and you know know what clutch chatter is. I noted you are also replacing the SPEC friction material with stock friction disks,
that will also make for smoother launches.

Carl,

Now that I know how all this stuff comes apart and goes together, and aren't really afraid of it anymore (the abyss of the unknown), I'm planning to reinstall the lightweight flywheel with the OEM friction discs that have the internal marsailles springs. If this combination isn't smooth enough, I'll just drop the lower housing, pull the clutch again and install the other flywheel to see how that goes, but compared to my 997, the 928 doesn't feel like a light, free-revving motor, so don't think I want to make it less so than the way it drives currently.

Thanks for the insight.

Carl Fausett 04-23-2019 01:11 PM

I'm with you. Once you get used to driving an aluminum flywheel, I can't go back, either. I enjoy the throttle response too much. :)

Petza914 04-24-2019 02:30 AM

Ordered more parts from Carl, Roger, and Mark and now think I'll have everything I need to put the new engine together and into the car. It was mostly gaskets, seals, covers, etc.

While waiting on those parts to arrive and for the powdercoated items to be ready, I cleaned up more oily parts to get them ready for paint and/or install. Also installed the lightweight flywheel onto the 4.7L motor, but haven't torqued it down yet.

Next is probably the oil pump seals, pan gasket, and cleaning up the engine bay.

Also pressure tested my radiator and it has a tube leak, so that's being sent off tomorrow to be recored.

Remember how the inside of the upper bell housing was caked with black crud - not anymore.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...23840112d3.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8151d40147.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4644a3c0b8.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8762bb2932.jpg

Chris Lockhart 04-24-2019 07:33 AM

Looking great Pete!! You are really coming along fast. I think you'll be back on the road before me. LOL.

Speaking of installing the flywheel, I've been trying to figure out if the bolts go in dry, with anti-seize, or with Loctite. The WSM mentions the torque procedure in several places, but doesn't say to put anything on the threads. I assume this means dry, or they would have said different. However virtually every flywheel I've ever installed or seen installed had something on the threads depending on application.

Petza914 04-24-2019 08:14 AM


Originally Posted by Chris Lockhart (Post 15795075)
Looking great Pete!! You are really coming along fast. I think you'll be back on the road before me. LOL.

Speaking of installing the flywheel, I've been trying to figure out if the bolts go in dry, with anti-seize, or with Loctite. The WSM mentions the torque procedure in several places, but doesn't say to put anything on the threads. I assume this means dry, or they would have said different. However virtually every flywheel I've ever installed or seen installed had something on the threads depending on application.

Thanks Chris.

The bolts I removed had some copper anti-seize on them and wanting to be able to get them out again at a future date, I cleaned them up and reinstalled with a little Marine grade anti-seize. I'm going to tighten them by having someone hold the crankshaft bolt at the opposite side since that will be in a tightening opposing direction as I torque the flywheel bolts at the opposite end.

Chris Lockhart 04-24-2019 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15795104)
Thanks Chris.

The bolts I removed had some copper anti-seize on them and wanting to be able to get them out again at a future date, I cleaned them up and reinstalled with a little Marine grade anti-seize. I'm going to tighten them by having someone hold the crankshaft bolt at the opposite side since that will be in a tightening opposing direction as I torque the flywheel bolts at the opposite end.

OK, cool. Thanks for the info. Right, wrong, or indifferent I put anti-seize on mine as well.

Carl Fausett 04-24-2019 11:31 AM

You have to be careful with thread lubricants. Most torque specs are dry unless other-wise mentioned. If you add anti-seize or some lubricant, it is very easy to over-torque the fastener because the lubricity allows over-rotation during assembly.

Check some typical torque charts, the good ones call out the different torque values depending on which lube you use. Here is just a simple version I found. Note how, if lube is used, you need to tighten to a much lower torque. Other charts are more precise as to which type of lube is used, but that's more than the average weekend mechanic needs to worry about. Problems of over-torque can include: over-clamping and deforming the parts being clamped; damage (strecthing) of the fastener; and failure of the threads in the fastener or the host material

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17d05a3c3b.png

Petza914 04-24-2019 12:07 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15795446)
You have to be careful with thread lubricants. Most torque specs are dry unless other-wise mentioned. If you add anti-seize or some lubricant, it is very easy to over-torque the fastener because the lubricity allows over-rotation during assembly.

Check some typical torque charts, the good ones call out the different torque values depending on which lube you use. Here is just a simple version I found. Note how, if lube is used, you need to tighten to a much lower torque. Other charts are more precise as to which type of lube is used, but that's more than the average weekend mechanic needs to worry about. Problems of over-torque can include: over-clamping and deforming the parts being clamped; damage (strecthing) of the fastener; and failure of the threads in the fastener or the host material

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17d05a3c3b.png


Thanks Carl, I was aware of that, but others may not have been. For example, on my 997s, the revised torque spec for the M14 lug bolts is 118 ft. lbs. I use anti-seize on those as well and only tighten to 90-95 ft lbs instead.

Doing some further research on this, without going into the different types of anti-seize lubricants that can be used, if using anti-seize on normally dry torque spec fasteners, it looks like a torque reduction of 25% should be about right as a general rule.

Chris Lockhart 04-24-2019 12:16 PM

Thanks Carl. Good to know.

Petza914 04-24-2019 11:28 PM

I flipped the 4.7L motor on the stand with the intention of doing the oil pan gasket tonight, but the pan has visible damage, either from shipping or from bottoming out when in use.

Do you guys think this pan is OK to use or should I source a replacement. I can clean up the grooves to make it look better and I don't believe it's going to leak as there was a little residual oil in the motor that doesn't look like it has leaked out.

Let me know what you think. I'm a little concerned about the right front corner (as shown here upside down, so the passenger front corner).

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a0f6bfbba7.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...98b7d59e5f.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-24-2019 11:45 PM

Hi Pete,
If you don't see any fractures on the fins and obviously the sealing surface, I would think you are OK. I also know the work you do, and I bet you can clean up those fins so they will look very good. Maybe someone else has had experience with a similar oil pan?
Good luck,
Dave

NelaK 04-25-2019 09:32 AM

I would try to make sure it's okay and then reuse it. Replacing an oil pan isn't really a major project if it ends up leaking. Of course I've never replaced one on the 928 so maybe it is..

Petza914 04-25-2019 09:54 AM


Originally Posted by NelaK (Post 15797633)
I would try to make sure it's okay and then reuse it. Replacing an oil pan isn't really a major project if it ends up leaking. Of course I've never replaced one on the 928 so maybe it is..

In a 928 it usually is, but in my case, I have the 928MS 3-piece front cross-member where I can remove the center section without disturbing the side pieces, the suspension, or the motor mounts, so I guess that would be an option. I cleaned up the crushed vanes and once they turn the same worn aluminum color as the rest of the pan will probably be OK. I have to pull the pan to upgrade the gasket anyway so I'll be able to see if there are any cracks in that one corner I'm concerned about. Worst case scenario is I could pull the pan from my 4.5L but it has always leaked around the drain plug so I was hoping not to have to reuse it and that motor is sitting on a skid on the oil pan so not convenient to extract it.

I'll probably proceed with this one.

Yesterday I pained some of the parts I had cleaned up the day before -harmonic dampener, oil return tube, coolant crossover pipe, motor brackets, steering rack plate, and the backside of the OEM flywheel which I'm keeping as a spare. I mounted and torqued down the lightweight flywheel to the new motor yesterday.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fb5fb2be57.jpg


I can't do much more besides cleaning until I get a couple of the shipments I'm waiting on and the cam towers back from the powdercoater. I could finish polishing the headers and Y-pipe.

Petza914 04-25-2019 09:21 PM

Maximizing use of my time on this tight project time-line...

After running my laps, I DEI Fire-sleeved the new high pressure power steering hose while at my son's soccer practice this evening :)

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e7a0dec128.jpg

Petza914 04-26-2019 02:19 AM

I installed the repainted motor brackets onto the mounts, then installed some new 4-ply silicone coolant hoses that came with the set I bought when I replaced the original hose that blew and caused the loss of coolant and overheating event that started this adventure.

I'll figure out the best orientation and length for the short hose that connects to the motor once it's back in place.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1bda234f10.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-26-2019 10:08 AM

That looks clean and nice, Pete. Great job as usual.
Good luck,
Dave

Wisconsin Joe 04-26-2019 09:29 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15797181)
Hi Pete,
If you don't see any fractures on the fins and obviously the sealing surface, I would think you are OK. I also know the work you do, and I bet you can clean up those fins so they will look very good. Maybe someone else has had experience with a similar oil pan?
Good luck,
Dave

Of course 'someone else' had a similar experience.

My pan has a significant 'impact mark' on the bottom,

When I did the pan gasket & MMs, we found a small area inside that was cracked. It was still attached on one side, but it had lifted a bit.

It doesn't go through and has held just fine for several years.

Petza914 04-27-2019 08:28 AM

Thanks guys. I didn't want to open up the bottom of the engine and then find out it was cracked and have to leave it that way for a week, so I sourced a nice used one that will be here next week.

I'm still looking for some input on which set of cam followers I should use from post 172 below if anyone has any.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 04-27-2019 09:06 AM

I figured you'd be doing the oil pan gasket anyway, so you would be inspecting the inside. Now you have a spare.
Good luck,
Dave

Majestic Moose 04-27-2019 02:11 PM

Since you have not gotten an answer I will submit my unqualified opinion. I believe the camshaft and lifters wear into each other and should be kept together. Wear is probably not the correct word but the effect is that each lobe and lifter "break-in" together. If you mix the lifter positions or replace them they have to break-in again. I would install the 4.5 cams and lifters into the 4.7 cam tower so long as the lifter dimensions are the same.

Petza914 04-27-2019 02:20 PM


Originally Posted by Majestic Moose (Post 15802593)
Since you have not gotten an answer I will submit my unqualified opinion. I believe the camshaft and lifters wear into each other and should be kept together. Wear is probably not the correct word but the effect is that each lobe and lifter "break-in" together. If you mix the lifter positions or replace them they have to break-in again. I would install the 4.5 cams and lifters into the 4.7 cam tower so long as the lifter dimensions are the same.

Thanks for your input. From what it looks like, the lifters rotate during regular use as I can see from the light marks on both the inside and outside of both sets so I didn't know if I should use what looks like the fresher set (darker bronze color inside of the 4.7L versions) or keep them paired as you suggest which is also why I labeled and kept straight each lifter in the egg crates.

GregBBRD 04-27-2019 05:54 PM

Engine 101. Engine Gospel. Go directly to engine hell, if violated.

Same lifter on original lobe. Never mix. Any engine.

Petza914 04-27-2019 06:00 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15802879)
Engine 101. Engine Gospel. Go directly to engine hell, if violated.

Same lifter on original lobe. Never mix. Any engine.

Thank you Greg. That's what I'll do once I get the cam towers back next week.

GregBBRD 04-27-2019 11:34 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15797675)
In a 928 it usually is, but in my case, I have the 928MS 3-piece front cross-member where I can remove the center section without disturbing the side pieces, the suspension, or the motor mounts, so I guess that would be an option. I cleaned up the crushed vanes and once they turn the same worn aluminum color as the rest of the pan will probably be OK. I have to pull the pan to upgrade the gasket anyway so I'll be able to see if there are any cracks in that one corner I'm concerned about. Worst case scenario is I could pull the pan from my 4.5L but it has always leaked around the drain plug so I was hoping not to have to reuse it and that motor is sitting on a skid on the oil pan so not convenient to extract it.

If your 4.5 has the original design pick-up with the cloverleaf in the bottom of the pan and the windage screen neat the top, you will want to use those pieces.

Petza914 04-28-2019 12:27 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15803389)
If your 4.5 has the original design pick-up with the cloverleaf in the bottom of the pan and the windage screen neat the top, you will want to use those pieces.

Greg,

Thanks again for your input.

I wasn't planning on pulling the pan from the 4.5L motor as it's currently sitting on it and I don't have a good way to do that (no second engine stand), but if the 4.5L has a better pick-up design than the 4.7L I might need to rethink that. By the end of next week the pan I ordered will have arrived, at which time I'll pull the current pan from the 4.7L to see what it looks like inside and figure out what to do from there.

Also, the pan I have coming looks like this inside, which seems to have a windage screen and maybe the other things you mentioned. Is this the setup you'd recommend I use or is this different from what should be in my 4.5L motor?

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c258026431.png
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6194d7b7a2.png

GregBBRD 04-28-2019 01:46 AM

That's what you want. Whoever is sending you the pan, ask them to send the oil pick-up also.

Veritable treasure, right there.

Petza914 04-28-2019 10:02 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15803580)
That's what you want. Whoever is sending you the pan, ask them to send the oil pick-up also.

Veritable treasure, right there.

Great news. Thanks and will do.

Petza914 04-29-2019 12:20 AM

Did a few things with the little time i had over the weekend. The painted plate under the steering rack is now reinstalled, I cleaned the K-Jet intake to get it ready for reinstallation atop the 4.7L motor once it's back in the car, cleaned and made a painting jig so I can paint the cam tower caps without getting paint on the sealing surface or threads, and changed the sealing method on the ring of the air meter for the intake. The plastic ring has never sealed very well with the piece that's part of the supercharger setup, probably because it is crushed in one area and doesn't align perfectly with the other mating piece. Tonight I figured out when cleaning it that not only does the black plastic ring come out, but the metal base ring just lifts off also. I separated the plastic ring and will throw that in my parts box but not reuse it, then used some foam weatherstripping in the mating grove around the metal ring and this should allow it to seal up extremely well once reassembled so I don't suffer any boost loss at this joint like I have in the past.


Cleaning the K-Jet setup - capped off any openings to prevent the introduction of any cleaning solution. Afterwards, propped the air meter and throttle plate just in case there was any solution entry so it could dry out. In the 2nd picture, note the new seal around the air meter housing - this is what the 928MS piece mates with for the forded air entry.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b63a9a470c.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...df977e8f64.jpg


Here's what the old plastic, deformed piece looked like.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...724b4309cb.jpg



Installed the plate under the PS rack

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...577009b5e6.jpg



Here's the little cam tower cap painting tool that exposes the tops and sides, but protects the mating surfaces and threads. I'll lay a strip of wax paper on it then push the plugs through to prevent the paint from sticking to the wood and getting messed up when I remove the plugs.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...74561d5aa2.jpg



Petza914 04-30-2019 12:38 AM

So tonight I was going to pull and reseal the oil pump, but this engine looks so clean and well put together, and the pump shaft turns smoothly that I'm thinking this might be a waste of time and just create the possibility for leaks that wouldn't otherwise occur.

Based on these photos, what would you guys do - pull it or leave it as is?

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17be8ec49e.jpg

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cccd1b47b1.jpg

Petza914 04-30-2019 01:33 AM

I did get a chance today to paint the cam tower caps. I was going to use red but the red likely wouldn't exactly match the red powdercoating being used for the cam tower writing, and they're already a grey color (though not all the same color), so I went with black, which will also give it a little old-school flavor of the black rubber press in caps from the original motor.

The jig with the wax paper worked perfectly.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1522621b8a.jpg

928 GT R 04-30-2019 05:18 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15803580)
That's what you want. Whoever is sending you the pan, ask them to send the oil pick-up also.

Veritable treasure, right there.

Fantastic thread!

Regarding this pan and pickup, Is it a standard 4.5 pan? If so, should I pick one of these up (+oil pickup tube) for a future engine project on a 5.0 (if compatible) and while they are still available?

I have never seen a factory pan like this:

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c0fc08cefd.png

Can't wait to see this car in person at SITM or PCNA Rendwous in Atlanta. Great perseverance and attention to detail Pete!

>

Kevin in Atlanta 04-30-2019 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15807854)
So tonight I was going to pull and reseal the oil pump, but this engine looks so clean and well put together, and the pump shaft turns smoothly that I'm thinking this might be a waste of time and just create the possibility for leaks that wouldn't otherwise occur.

Based on these photos, what would you guys do - pull it or leave it as is?


Unless you know it's been done before...

Pull it, replace the o-ring and bolt o-rings. Easy decision.

Petza914 04-30-2019 10:58 AM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15808379)
Unless you know it's been done before...

Pull it, replace the o-ring and bolt o-rings. Easy decision.

It was done when the engine was rebuilt, which was only 1,500 miles ago, but also about 16 months. I should probably just pull it and do the seals as I already have them on-hand and would be really mad if I put it all back together and then had an oil pump leak.

What about the main shaft seal in addition to the o-ring an bolt seals?

Thanks for the sage advice.

Kevin in Atlanta 04-30-2019 11:26 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15808415)
It was done when the engine was rebuilt, which was only 1,500 miles ago, but also about 16 months. I should probably just pull it and do the seals as I already have them on-hand and would be really mad if I put it all back together and then had an oil pump leak.

What about the main shaft seal in addition to the o-ring an bolt seals?

Thanks for the sage advice.

Replace that, too.

karl ruiter 04-30-2019 05:54 PM

If you have the seals on hand you might as well for fun and peace of mind. Its very easy. After I did mine a few weeks ago I read on here that oiling the outer surface of the seal prior to insertion is highly frowned upon as some folks have had a history of the seals walking out over time if this is done. There is no question that the seals are still good after 16 months, but it would be good to know they are in just the way you want and to have a look at the shafts. My '88 was all original and after 372 months they were not so good.

Petza914 05-01-2019 10:44 AM

I took care of the oil pump last night. Glad I decided to do it as I discovers my pump gear is the steel version and from what I read on Rennlist (Stan), and in the WSM, the 1mm shim that was installed on my shaft should only be used with the aluminum pump gear. Please confirm that's correct.

I put everything back together with Driven Assembly Grease and will first run this motor with their BR break in oil, for 50-100 miles or so, since it has some new parts and I'm using the cams from the 4.5L motor and want everything to settle in nicely. The Driven Assembly Grease is designed to dissolve in thee Driven BR oil and not clog passageways or remain thick.


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0cb5d64099.jpg
Removed, disassembled, and cleaned. New parts collection for reinstallation.



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...035f19e938.jpg
Pump housing on engine cleaned up - looks good inside



https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...62e1fa0d86.jpg
Pump gear is steel (ferrous) but you can also see the 1mm shim that shouldn't be used with the steel gear



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...75a2de5d45.jpg
Oil pump reassembled with new o-ring and generously coated with Driven Assembly Grease. Note dots visibe on both gear faces that need to face the block side of the engine. This means the outer gear is installed in the correct orientation.



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3e37ec328.jpg
Oil pump installed with new woodruff key, 1mm washer omitted, inner plastic cover installed and both the oil pump pulley and crankshaft pulley are reinstalled.



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1c911bf160.jpg
I painted the steel pulleys that are going onto this motor with VHT hi-temp ceramic engine enamel, but not the running surfaces of the pulleys to avoid any issues the paint might cause with the belt.



I also did a little work to the water inlet pipe on the flywheel side of the motor. Mine was badly corroded.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7112995c69.jpg
My 4.5L fitting was pretty badly corroded



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...516f031fc4.jpg
The one on the 4.7L motor was much better but has this extra wing that must be used to mount something related to the L-Jet system. With me reusing my K-Jet setup, that portion is in the way of the assembly, so I trimmed it off.



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9026c80b6c.jpg
Water inlet - adapted



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2c32aec54.jpg
Should work just fine now

Kevin in Atlanta 05-01-2019 11:22 AM

The steel versus aluminum pulley is the one you painted red - not the one you have a magnetic probe attached to. It's that actual pulley that is important. If your pulley is aluminum, replace it with the steel version and leave the shim off.

Petza914 05-01-2019 11:41 AM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15810972)
The steel versus aluminum pulley is the one you painted red - not the one you have a magnetic probe attached to. It's that actual pulley that is important. If your pulley is aluminum, replace it with the steel version and leave the shim off.

Kevin, thanks for clarifying. All my pulleys are steel and the older square tooth style (not the high-torque curved ones). I installed without the shim so I'm good?

Petza914 05-03-2019 06:54 PM

The new oil pan and pickup arrived while I was out of town this week. They weren't bad, but got a chance to really clean them up today and should be able to get the installation done over the weekend with the new silicone gasket and pan stud kit.

Turned out to be a really nice pan with only a little impact mark on the bottom near the drain plug. No tears in the windage screen, no cracks in the clover, and the rubber seal on good shape.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...77f43b7356.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...334dff8f41.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f69a0fd2ad.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...bbb32eca20.jpg

GregBBRD 05-03-2019 10:12 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15816844)
The new oil pan and pickup arrived while I was out of town this week. They weren't bad, but got a chance to really clean them up today and should be able to get the installation done over the weekend with the new silicone gasket and pan stud kit.

Turned out to be a really nice pan with only a little impact mark on the bottom near the drain plug. No tears in the windage screen, no cracks in the clover, and the rubber seal on good shape.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...77f43b7356.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...334dff8f41.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f69a0fd2ad.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...bbb32eca20.jpg

Complete with the "later" (superceeded) pick-up to clover leaf seal.....

Gold treasure, instead of just silver treasure,

Petza914 05-03-2019 10:15 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15817211)
Complete with the "later" (superceeded) pick-up to clover leaf seal.....

Gold treasure, instead of just silver treasure,

Ha, more dumb luck...had to buy the pickup separately as the seller of the oil pan didn't have it any longer and this one was cheaper than the others I found - $45 I think.

Mrmerlin 05-05-2019 10:50 AM

Nice work here , I put one of those pans in Samanthas engine,
from your photos I would remove the paint from the faces of the cam drive gear ,
since its a compression assembly you dont want the painting to act as a bearing and slowly wear off,
thus creating a space, then the bolt possibly coming loose.
The factory never painted any of these gears neither should you.

Petza914 05-05-2019 11:04 PM

I pulled the oil pan from the 4.7L motor tonight to install the new pan, pickup, and silicone gasket.

Is this wear and damage on the crankshaft OK. I assume the important part of the crank is the part where the bearings ride, which I can't see, but I would have preferred that the 2 on the one side look like the 2 on the other side without the chunks and rough spots.

I photographed what I could see of the bores as well, and they look pretty good to me.

Here's the old pickup screen too.

Let me know before I continue.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ba3b9e7025.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5d76c8cb52.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fff26200c3.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5ef9475789.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8b4b882ac3.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4678800c5e.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ee45c63a1c.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c2f9a58317.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f2d4346860.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4ec89a035a.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff9c567529.jpg

Kevin in Atlanta 05-05-2019 11:29 PM

Nevermind....

Petza914 05-06-2019 01:51 AM

Assuming the situation with the crank will be OK and not really having the time to lose what I could get accomplished tonight, I forged ahead with the oil pan gasket, stud kit, etc.

I cleaned all the mounting holes by spraying some brake cleaner into them while the engine was right side up, then flipped the motor and used some Q-tips to get the threaded mounting holes really clean.

I then loctited the studs into the engine. I first put in a couple that didn't have the through hole to see at what length they bottomed out, then used a caliper to set this distance and installed all the studs to the same depth, specifically the ones with through holes where they would turn through as long as I want them to.

I reinstalled the pickup assembly into the pan I bought, cleaned up both surfaces really well, then set the gasket onto the studs and then the pan onto to gasket. Then I put on the washers and threaded the lock nuts on until I felt the resistance of the nylok portion. I'm going to let the loctite setup overnight so that when I go to tighten the nuts, the studs that don't bottom out won't turn in. This will also let the weight of the pan sit on the gasket overnight to get it nice and flat before I torque it down. I'll probably use an allen wrench to hold the stud at the same time I tighten the nut.

I'm also going to change my coolant to orange Dexcool from the green ethylene glycol I had been running since the orange has better anti-corrosion properties, so I put the heater control valve to full hot and flushed the heater core of the green coolant using a hose until the water ran out clear (note one bucket was green and the final one was clear).

That's it for tonight.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...cf36cafc27.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...75c490be17.jpg



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5303891eb7.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8413543b72.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4dc628e434.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...745c1356b2.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2bf1997c1f.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5189b07cd4.jpg


By the way, this Sunex engine stand is great. It effortlessly allows rotating the motor and holds it in any position where you stop the handle. There's no "flop" as you cross over the top either. Thanks GB for the recommendation in a different thread that I came across.

Carl Fausett 05-06-2019 12:10 PM

I don't see a shoulder on those studs and that concerns me. They also look long, but maybe that's just an optical illusion. The barrel on the stud should look like the barrel around a night-crawler. Without the barrel, the stud will not stop turning in. They are supposed to be installed until the barrell (aka shoulder) of the stud stops further turns, then given a little pre-torque to set the stud.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff97ac82e4.jpg

Petza914 05-06-2019 12:50 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15821636)
I don't see a shoulder on those studs and that concerns me. They also look long, but maybe that's just an optical illusion. The barrel on the stud should look like the barrel around a night-crawler. Without the barrel, the stud will not stop turning in. They are supposed to be installed until the barrell (aka shoulder) of the stud stops further turns, then given a little pre-torque to set the stud.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ff97ac82e4.jpg


Carl, you're correct that there aren't any shoulders on these studs that came with that kit, so I'm hoping the loctite and counter holding the stud will allow them to torque down properly, since they require so little torque. If not, I'll have to replace the studs with a set like you've pictured. I'll do the ones that bottom out first to get a fell for what 30 in.lbs. of torque feels like then do the others with through holes uses what feels like a similar forces, as there isn't really a way to get a standard torque wrench on some of them anyway.

Length doesn't look too bad though, but maybe just slightly long, and only for the 4 in the center of the pan where the OEM bolts are usually shorter, as all the studs in this kit are the same length.

Being the engine guru that you are, is that crankshaft OK to proceed with?

Kevin in Atlanta 05-06-2019 12:56 PM

Mount the starter to see if the studs are too long causing an interference problem.

Carl Fausett 05-06-2019 01:24 PM

Kevin is right, if they are too long, you will have trouble mounting the starter.

Loctite is an anaerobic product. It only congeals in the absence of air. It is the pre-torque on the threads that stretches the fastener and seals the threads against air. I think, in the absence of pre-torque, the Loctitie will not set and you will find your studs will turn when met with the self-locking nut. Try it and see.

I cannot comment on the crank, I see no pics with any bearing caps removed, and of course, micrometer readings. I strongly recommend you replace the con rod bearings right now, you will never have a better chance and its a great way to boost oil pressure. Besides - its the only way to inspect those rod journals. Replacing rod bearings is an easy job.

Petza914 05-06-2019 01:28 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15821764)
Mount the starter to see if the studs are too long causing an interference problem.

Good idea, but that might be hard to test with my setup. My starter mounts to the lower clutch bell housing rather than to a normal starter bracket and the engine is mounted to the stand on the flywheel side, so no way to put the upper and lower bell housings on currently. If there's intereference, I'll just have to adjust the length of those studs during reinstallation.


Here' my starter before I took it loose and I see the potential for interference you're talking about with the studs directly above it.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c1cf751dc0.jpg



Here's the normal starter bracket I had to cut off the new motor
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6dcd5a58a7.jpg

Petza914 05-06-2019 01:56 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15821842)

I cannot comment on the crank, I see no pics with any bearing caps removed, and of course, micrometer readings. I strongly recommend you replace the con rod bearings right now, you will never have a better chance and its a great way to boost oil pressure. Besides - its the only way to inspect those rod journals. Replacing rod bearings is an easy job.

This is the part of the crank I'm referring to - it's on the counterweights and not the business portion that rides in the bearings. A few rough spots and a couple shallow chunks missing. Also, what causes damage to the counterweights since they don't come into contact with anything?

I"m not going to undertake further disassembly at this point, so won't be taking the connecting rods apart to change the bearings. Need to get the car put back together and on the road. If the project gets more extensive than this, it runs the risk of getting boxed up and setting on the lift for the summer as I"m approaching having too much else going on with work travel and the kids school year ending to have the time to continue with it.

I'm moving past the disassembly point and into reassembly. If it has a major issue after being put back together, at least it will be together and occupying less space than it currently is, but hoping for the best.

I'll be using a Break In oil once it's put back together which should help remove some of the oil build up it looks like is here and dissolve the Assembly Lube that's on some of the parts as they go back together, then running my normal Driven DT50 after that.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...438cbdbc17.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d0234edb59.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3c7942298b.jpg

Carl Fausett 05-06-2019 02:20 PM

Those counterweight marks seem a little unusual, but the crank is forged and the major diameter of that section simply did not flow out far enough to be machined off like the rest of the counterweight. Not the best job on a crank from Porsche that I have seen, but not a failure point, either.

Disagree with your decision not to even inspect the rod bearings while you are here. At the least, pull rod caps on #2 and #6 and inspect. That will tell you a LOT. If you don't, and it has worn or damaged bearings, your time with this motor in the car could be real short. Its up to you.

Petza914 05-06-2019 04:37 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15821955)
Those counterweight marks seem a little unusual, but the crank is forged and the major diameter of that section simply did not flow out far enough to be machined off like the rest of the counterweight. Not the best job on a crank from Porsche that I have seen, but not a failure point, either.

Disagree with your decision not to even inspect the rod bearings while you are here. At the least, pull rod caps on #2 and #6 and inspect. That will tell you a LOT. If you don't, and it has worn or damaged bearings, your time with this motor in the car could be real short. Its up to you.

Carl, is removing the caps as simple as rotating the motor clockwise until the nuts for one of the connecting rod caps are facing up, and removing the two nuts? What keeps the piston and connecting rod or rod bolts from then falling away into the cylinder? For reassembly, can the same bolts and nuts be reused or would I have to have new ones on hand, how do you keep the bolt head from turning as you torque the nut since it's on the bottom side, and what's the nut torque spec?

Kevin in Atlanta 05-06-2019 05:23 PM

If you remove the caps WSM calls for replacing the rod end nuts.

You can see the slippery slope in the distance....

Petza914 05-06-2019 05:59 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15822395)
If you remove the caps WSM calls for replacing the rod end nuts.

You can see the slippery slope in the distance....

Yes, I can. This motor only has 1500 miles on it since a rebuild and the videos I've seen of it running and driving seem like it doesn't have any issues. I'm forging ahead without removing the bearings or rod caps.

Quick question - when installing a Porken Tensioner, do you install it with the OEM tensioner gasket (I have a new one on hand) or just right up against the metal framework of the engine?

Rob Edwards 05-06-2019 06:18 PM

What kind of rebuild did it get that the internals are that gummy after only 1500 miles?

At the very least (re-) torque each rod nut with a 12 point 14 mm socket to 54 ft lbs. Don't loosen, just a nice slow pull to ensure that they're all at spec.

Petza914 05-06-2019 06:26 PM


Originally Posted by Rob Edwards (Post 15822523)
What kind of rebuild did it get that the internals are that gummy after only 1500 miles?

At the very least (re-) torque each rod nut with a 12 point 14 mm socket to 54 ft lbs. Don't loosen, just a nice slow pull to ensure that they're all at spec.

It's Josh's (ladybug83) motor from this thread that I bought from BC

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...19-engine.html

Carl Fausett 05-06-2019 06:36 PM

I guess I am just a little less trusting. Its a long way in when rod bearings are bad. I always feel that a used engine was removed from a car for a reason, and I'd like to know that the reason wasn't the engine. I do not know the providence of this motor, so if you do, then perhaps you can skip some of these checks.

Rob Edwards 05-06-2019 07:15 PM

Ah, I see- Josh did nice work on that motor, the head work is first rate and the compression figures look good, but he didn't touch the bottom end on a ~200+ K mile motor. They're _probably_ fine, but at the very least I'd pull the 2-6 bearing caps and mic the bearings, just for giggles. It's $10 worth of new rod nuts and an excuse to buy a ball-end micrometer.

BC 05-07-2019 12:00 AM

You would buy new nuts and take a few off. Mains don’t wear very much.

Petza914 05-07-2019 02:34 AM

I took Rob's advice and removed all the lock nuts and washers that I had loosely installed last night. Checking the torque on the connecting rod cap fasteners, all were essentially properly tensioned - 2 of them moved just a hair, like maybe 1-2 ft.lbs..

Forged ahead with the silicone pan gasket install, but while I had the pan back off took a look at the stud kit that was on the pan of my 4.5L motor, which is the 928MS version that Carl installed during my original engine work, as I thought I would remove any that might interfere with the starter and clip them a little shorter as I have a metric screw cutter. In comparing them, the 928MS ones don't actually look like they protrude any less, so I didn't do anything about shortening them as the starter was bolted onto the 4.5L motor without any interference issues. Also, the Loctite gel I applied last night, held the studs that don't bottom out perfectly secure as I went through the torquing process on the oil pan to 25 in.lbs. It took a number of passes criss-crossing as I went to achieve the torque spec that would remain when I checked on the next pass, but now all 30 fasteners are torqued the same and holding that value - looking forward to a dry engine and garage floor now.

Here are both versions of the stud kits for comparison - Rogers on the shiny clean engine and Carl's on the dirty 4.5L engine.


https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...06a7c05fb5.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...49a0914fd4.jpg


Then I flipped the motor back over and mounted a couple of the cooling system pieces I had painted with new gaskets, including the inlet elbow at the rear of the motor I had modified and the opposing side block-off plate. Can't do the front water bridge yet as it adds a lot of height and will make reinstalling the motor into the car while it sits on the lift more challenging, which is why I removed them when I was pulling the motor.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ed75bf461e.jpg




Then I cleaned up the pan and pickup that came on the 4.7L motor and will probably list them for sale or take them to SITM.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dc638c9ce3.jpg

karl ruiter 05-07-2019 03:50 PM

On the rod question, you DO have the three piece cross brace, so it will be amazingly easy for you to do this in the future. Still, without knowing about your time constraints, I would probably do it now because it will be still easier on with the motor upside down.

Mrmerlin 05-07-2019 07:20 PM

Pete since you dont have the belt on yet I would suggest to remove the oil pump and fill it with STP oil,
then put it back in, The STP will make it easy for the oil pump to prime and pump.

NOTE the oil is better than the grease and wont plug up the oil filter.

please post pictures of the 2/6 rod bearings and crank for an accurate diagnosis.
I would suggest to use PTFE non setting pipe sealant on the water pump bolts so the next time they come off they will.
Use new bolts for the pump
Same for the water bridge and the HCV housing and block off plate

Petza914 05-07-2019 08:01 PM


Originally Posted by Mrmerlin (Post 15825108)
Pete since you dont have the belt on yet I would suggest to remove the oil pump and fill it with STP oil,
then put it back in, The STP will make it easy for the oil pump to prime and pump.

NOTE the oil is better than the grease and wont plug up the oil filter.

please post pictures of the 2/6 rod bearings and crank for an accurate diagnosis.
I would suggest to use PTFE non setting pipe sealant on the water pump bolts so the next time they come off they will.
Use new bolts for the pump
Same for the water bridge and the HCV housing and block off plate

Good advice as always Stan.

I actually put the same BR30 oil into the pump that I'll be using for the engine start-up, before installing it. Turning the pump pulley by hand it makes a good sucking sound, so seems like it has a good seal and will pump just fine.

BC 05-07-2019 08:35 PM

What I have tried to do is loop the oil cooler and just before the belt goes on, and everything else is on, I prime the oil pump with pressure. Not sure if that helps or hinders, but I have done that a few times.

Kevin in Atlanta 05-07-2019 10:55 PM

Pete, you may want to get one of these. Allows you to connect a hose to deliver the used oil without the usual mess.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...940ce74b23.jpg

Petza914 05-07-2019 10:59 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15825564)
Pete, you may want to get one of these. Allows you to connect a hose to deliver the used oil without the usual mess.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...940ce74b23.jpg


I bought one of those, but it was a different model that was specified for the early cars and it doesn't thread in properly, like the thread pitch is incorrect. Maybe I need to try the one you've shown. Will that one fit my early to mid oil pans?

Kevin in Atlanta 05-07-2019 11:06 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15825574)
I bought one of those, but it was a different model that was specified for the early cars and it doesn't thread in properly, like the thread pitch is incorrect. Maybe I need to try the one you've shown. Will that one fit my early to mid oil pans?

I really can't hazard a guess - I'm a 87+ specialist.

Petza914 05-07-2019 11:13 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15825595)
I really can't hazard a guess - I'm a 87+ specialist.

I have a set of those metric thread gauges. I'll see which one fits into the pan I just removed and cleaned since the specs on that valve you posted are an M20-1.5 to see if that's what I need. If so, I'll pick one up. I also think they make 90 degree versions which would point the draining stream down into the collection pan - the risk there being it orienting correctly at the proper torque value so the straight eject one with a hose on it is probably the safer bet.

Carl Fausett 05-09-2019 06:32 PM

If you don't have the timing belt on yet, you can prime the whole oiling system and bring it up to pressure with an electric drill. Bits that fit a drill and snap into a 3/8" socket drive are common. Put the right socket on the nut and spin it up.

Petza914 05-09-2019 07:24 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15830033)
If you don't have the timing belt on yet, you can prime the whole oiling system and bring it up to pressure with an electric drill. Bits that fit a drill and snap into a 3/8" socket drive are common. Put the right socket on the nut and spin it up.

Timing belt isn't on yet as I don't pick up the powdercoated cam towers until tomorrow. Also haven't filled the engine with oil yet as I thought I might need to flip it upside down again, but will definitely do that once I have it filled up.

Carl Fausett 05-10-2019 11:17 AM


dr bob 05-10-2019 05:31 PM

Hmmm..... cordless oil-pump!

928 GT R 05-11-2019 08:47 AM

Nice! I'm learning enough following these threads to get myself not real trouble!

Petza914 05-12-2019 04:05 AM

Picked up the parts from powdercoat on Friday and started serious reassembly today.


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4ab83c04e5.jpg
Parts from the powdercoater



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a4070bbc59.jpg
Since they sandblasted them before coating, I wanted to make sure any sand was thoroughly flushed out. They looked too clean to run back through my garage parts washer since it has dirty cleaning fluid in it now from this project, so I used the other parts washer :)



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a5d6477652.jpg
CM tower all greased up with lifters installed ready to go back on



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c8b64e2672.jpg
Passenger side done with Cerakote coated SS round tube headers I picked up from Jim Doer



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...49d37011f8.jpg
Driver's side completed with port for crankcase vent



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1d657f073c.jpg
Both sides on along with preliminary setup of the Porken Tensioner


I have the other cam tower caps (pulley side) in the freezer to make them contract a little, as they seem to be a pretty tight fit, even before I get to the o-ring sealing gaskets.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-12-2019 11:01 AM

Beautiful work, Pete.
Thanks for sharing,
Dave

Petza914 05-12-2019 08:00 PM

Worked on a few things today, but couldn't do too much with it being mother's day and all.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6ae498d634.jpg
Freezer trick worked and the ends are now installed, but I realized I'm missing a few small parts like the end seals and I need a new bushing on the driver's side.




https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b71635ac2a.jpg
Took apart the spider intake to clean it up. This body will be sold with matching painted legs that I have, but these legs will get reused with the new spider body.


Also spent some time going more cleanup and polishing on my stainless Y-pipe. I'm trying to get all the burned on oil from the prior engine off so it's slow going.

Petza914 05-15-2019 10:19 AM

As part of this engine project and because of the supercharger, I'm adding a knock detector even though the early cars didn't use them. This, along with the AFR gauge, and the updated distributor from a 4.7L car that has both advance and retard capability, I should be able to fine tune the advance timing for maximum benefit, but still protect the motor from knock occurring. The knock sensor is a kit from LINK systems, called their Knocklink and is self calibrating. It essentially learns what the motor sounds like under normal situations and then should it detect a knock outside of that normal, will flash a warning light in the cockpit (http://dealers.linkecu.com/G4KNL).

While I was waiting on some cam end shaft seals to arrive, I decided to tackle this one last night. I had already made a hole through the firewall for previous wiring projects, so passing the 2 strand shielded cable through from the cockpit to the engine compartment was pretty easy. The next challenge was trying to decide where to mount the warning light which also has the system controller built into it, so larger than just a warning light would need to be. I thought about up on the windshield visor area, but didn't think I wanted a flashing red light up there at night, considered the center console area, but couldn't come up with a plan that would look nice and in the day time, thought I might not see the warning light if down that far, and then I had a great idea....

Because my car is a convertible, I do not have a rear wiper, even though I still have a rear wiper switch that isn't used for anything. It would provide for a 12v switched circuit to power the knocklink when the key was on, an easily accessible ground wire, and be in a good position to catch it blinking without having to specifically direct my attention to it, so I pulled out the switch from the top right position of the pod and started looking at it to see if there was a way to install the warning light there.

With some customizing (cannibalizing) of the old switch, it looks like it will work perfectly.


Kit packaging and info including the Bosch brand knock sensor.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...46561a7722.jpg


Pieces of the old rear wiper switch and the sensor mounted in it
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3419b855a8.jpg



The sensor is a tight fit in both the rubber switch part, which is held tight by the Jager pod trim rings I use and I also used the back part of the switch that locks it into the dash pod hole
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3ee4f5f1c8.jpg\



Front view
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2f4d08c508.jpg



Close-up installed in pod
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...04ae5d8ed6.jpg



Wider angle view
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e2d1a18a06.jpg



The knock sensor will mount in the center position of the block with an 8mm bolt that will thread into an adapter I've purchase. The adapter is an M14x1.5 plug with a threaded 8mm center hole. I'll install both with sealing washers to prevent any oil leaks. I've already successfully broken loose the center valley plug. The M6 bolt you see threaded into the flywheel side valley plug will be used for the ground location of the knock sensor (instruction say to ground it to the block as close as possible to the knock sensor.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8f2820004a.jpg



Here's the harness that comes through the firewall. Ring terminal is for the ground and the other plug with the sensor wire will attach to the knock sensor once the motor is mounted back into the car. I'll clean up the red wire looping once everything is connected an I determine the optimal routing.
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...734d6714da.jpg


The only thing I couldn't test when coming up with this plan was whether the green wire that goes to the rear wiper switch is a 12v switched circuit or a constant 12v circuit since my battery is currently disconnected while working on the engine R & R. I was assuming it was switched since the wipers only work when the key is switched on, but because of wiper parking functions, wasn't 100% certain. Can anyone confirm tha's a switched wire?

Thanks.

NelaK 05-15-2019 10:31 AM

That is a pretty neat device but based off their description of how it works, don't you think the constantly blinking lights will get really annoying, especially being mounted there? It will pretty much always be blinking in the bottom of your vision. The information it provides is useful but 99.99% of the time, you're only interested if it flashes red.. unless there's some way to configure that on the device so it only lights up if it detects an issue?

Petza914 05-15-2019 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by NelaK (Post 15841897)
That is a pretty neat device but based off their description of how it works, don't you think the constantly blinking lights will get really annoying, especially being mounted there? It will pretty much always be blinking in the bottom of your vision. The information it provides is useful but 99.99% of the time, you're only interested if it flashes red.. unless there's some way to configure that on the device so it only lights up if it detects an issue?

Here's a YouTube video that better shows what you'll see vs the description they provide.


It changes color and blinks during initial startup, then displays a solid green light unless detonation is detected, in which case, it flashes red. So should be just a dim, solid green light all the time, unless knock is detected. If it's too bright, I'll cover the lens with a piece of tint film until I get the intensity right.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-15-2019 11:22 AM

I like your knock sensor system. Great job.
Dave

NelaK 05-15-2019 11:23 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15841963)
Here's a YouTube video that better shows what you'll see vs the description they provide.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLJtTejxvYw

It changes color and blinks during initial startup, then displays a solid green light unless detonation is detected, in which case, it flashes red. So should be just a dim, solid green light all the time, unless knock is detected. If it's too bright, I'll cover the lens with a piece of tint film until I get the intensity right.

That's not so bad. And here I was thinking of some complicated solution involving modifying your instrument cluster and an Arduino :p

Petza914 05-15-2019 06:47 PM

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6edcd397ea.jpg

GregBBRD 05-15-2019 09:36 PM

Don't expect much viable data from knock sensors on early 928 engines.

Porsche, in their infinite wisdom, has used pistons with "offset" piston pins, virtually forever. (The piston pin isn't centered in the middle of the piston, but is moved towards one wall (skirt) of the piston.) 356's, 911's, 914's, 924's, 944's, and 928's (up to the introduction of knock sensors in 1987) were all this way. The "rub" is that on all the engines with pistons on different sides (everything except inline 4 cylinders), the pistons have an up and down (different size valve reliefs for intake and exhaust. This means that the offset of the piston, in relationship to the crankshafts is different from side to side of the engine. One side of the engine ends up with the offset such that "piston slap" is reduced. The other side has the offset up in the incorrect direction and the piston slap is greatly increased (But, interestingly enough, makes slightly more power.)

Not their "brightest" engineering moment. And, frankly, a bit "thickheaded" to keep making this mistake over and over again....model after model. Especially "slow" for a company that "hangs their hat" on their superior engineering capability.

When they developed the knock sensor system, the piston slap from the pistons that were backwards in the engine, fooled the knock sensors to the point where they were useless. Porsche was forced to make pistons with symmetrical valve reliefs (in 1987 and later), so that the pistons could be installed with the valve reliefs facing the correct direction, eliminating piston slap.

(^^^^^^This concept can be difficult for "normal people" to grasp. Trust me, it's a big deal.)

NelaK 05-15-2019 09:49 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15843476)
Don't expect much viable data from knock sensors on early 928 engines.

Porsche, in their infinite wisdom, has used pistons with "offset" piston pins, virtually forever. (The piston pin isn't centered in the middle of the piston, but is moved towards one wall (skirt) of the piston.) 356's, 911's, 914's, 924's, 944's, and 928's (up to the introduction of knock sensors in 1987) were all this way. The "rub" is that on all the engines with pistons on different sides (everything except inline 4 cylinders), the pistons have an up and down (different size valve reliefs for intake and exhaust. This means that the offset of the piston, in relationship to the crankshafts is different from side to side of the engine. One side of the engine ends up with the offset such that "piston slap" is reduced. The other side has the offset up in the incorrect direction and the piston slap is greatly increased (But, interestingly enough, makes slightly more power.)

Not their "brightest" engineering moment. And, frankly, a bit "thickheaded" to keep making this mistake over and over again....model after model. Especially "slow" for a company that "hangs their hat" on their superior engineering capability.

When they developed the knock sensor system, the piston slap from the pistons that were backwards in the engine, fooled the knock sensors to the point where they were useless. Porsche was forced to make pistons with symmetrical valve reliefs (in 1987 and later), so that the pistons could be installed with the valve reliefs facing the correct direction, eliminating piston slap.

(^^^^^^This concept can be difficult for "normal people" to grasp. Trust me, it's a big deal.)

I don't know anything about engine design so this might be a stupid question but what about the Cayenne engine? I vaguely recall that they have a similar setup... Along with a tendency to kill themselves with bore scoring and a lot of piston slap.

Petza914 05-16-2019 12:36 AM

Camshaft seals from Roger arrived today so Bank 1-4 is now put together. Waiting on the cam spacer for the 5-8 side and then I'll assemble that one too. New (used) distributor with both advance and retard ports installed too with a new sealing ring. It will get a new rotor and cap too.


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...130e3bb085.jpg


Waiting on a couple more things that arrive tomorrow & Friday and then I can really start making some reassembly progress - going to be a busy weekend.

Petza914 05-16-2019 12:40 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15843476)
Don't expect much viable data from knock sensors on early 928 engines.

Porsche, in their infinite wisdom, has used pistons with "offset" piston pins, virtually forever. (The piston pin isn't centered in the middle of the piston, but is moved towards one wall (skirt) of the piston.) 356's, 911's, 914's, 924's, 944's, and 928's (up to the introduction of knock sensors in 1987) were all this way. The "rub" is that on all the engines with pistons on different sides (everything except inline 4 cylinders), the pistons have an up and down (different size valve reliefs for intake and exhaust. This means that the offset of the piston, in relationship to the crankshafts is different from side to side of the engine. One side of the engine ends up with the offset such that "piston slap" is reduced. The other side has the offset up in the incorrect direction and the piston slap is greatly increased (But, interestingly enough, makes slightly more power.)

Not their "brightest" engineering moment. And, frankly, a bit "thickheaded" to keep making this mistake over and over again....model after model. Especially "slow" for a company that "hangs their hat" on their superior engineering capability.

When they developed the knock sensor system, the piston slap from the pistons that were backwards in the engine, fooled the knock sensors to the point where they were useless. Porsche was forced to make pistons with symmetrical valve reliefs (in 1987 and later), so that the pistons could be installed with the valve reliefs facing the correct direction, eliminating piston slap.

(^^^^^^This concept can be difficult for "normal people" to grasp. Trust me, it's a big deal.)

Interesting, I guess we'll see if I can pick up anything or if the noisy side calibrates the sensor to a baseline where it doesn't pick up knock on the quiet side very well.

I understand what you're saying about the offset wrist pin location in the piston, as the 997 M97 motors are the same way, and I think maybe the Cayennes too. In some of these engines, they think it might be a contributor to bore scoring as the piston "rocks" during it's travel in the cylinder due to the offset pin position on one side.

karl ruiter 05-16-2019 04:16 PM

My understanding is that Cayenne bore scoring happen on cold starts in very cold environments. My guess is that the piston fit is too tight and that as the piston warms up very much faster than the block it is briefly too big. Maybe too simple minded though.

Kevin in Atlanta 05-16-2019 05:51 PM

Kevin Wilson (aka Jetson...) bought a Cayenne while at the last Frenzy. Borescope revealed some scoring and intermittent check engine light. Came with a complete replacement engine. Soon after he bought it threw a code - a timing chain jumped. Local Porsche dealership offered to empty Kevin's wallet. Instead. Kevin shipped the Cayenne back to VA to be repaired, bought a used head to harvest the broken tensioner and since repaired is running great - in fact he drove it to Missouri and back with no issues. My guess is the earlier codes were due to the failing tensioner. The replacement engine is sitting in a storage unit outside Atlanta.

Petza914 05-17-2019 02:14 AM

Tonight I used a new tool that's designed to make the cutting of silicone hoses, fast, easy, and most importantly, precise.

On my car I'm running Euro intake legs and a non-Euro body, primarily because I found these beautiful red powdercoated intake legs a few years ago that looked at lot better than the ones I had painted. The challenge with this setup is that the diameter of the leg ends is larger than the fittings where they connect on the manifold.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3598f7e736.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6e99d5646d.jpg


The non-Euro version of the couplers fit the manifold well, but are really tight on the legs, and the Euro versions fit the legs perfectly, but are too loose on the manifold. Figuring tighter is better than looser, I had been using the non-Euro versions and just stretching them over the Euro leg ends, but a couple of them had started to tear at the edges, and I assume the intake air going from a larger opening to a smaller one, without any sort of transition, probably created a little turbulence, though probably not enough to matter since the car ran great.

But while I was doing all of this, I decided it would be great if I could find a source for a coupler that was the proper size on each end with a smooth transition between them, and in doing some online research, came across www.siliconeintakes.com that has all types of high-quality, multi-ply, silicone hoses available. They make a silicone reducer that goes from 1.875" (47.625mm) on one side to 1.75"(44.45mm) on the other, which is just about perfect, as both ends are just a little smaller than the pieces they slide onto, so I ordered 8.

The next challenge with them is that they're about 3" (78.53mm) in length, and the OEM couplers are only 42.75mm, so I would need to trim them down to a proper length, as you don't want them to extend beyond the smooth flange on the leg, and they can't extend on the manifold as they hit the body sides.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6a05e87846.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c868415b28.jpg


Having worked with silicone hose in the past (my custom cold air intake project), I was kind of dreading the trimming down process as I've tried a number of different techniques (band saw with a fine tooth blade which can get a little exciting if the band binds a little in the soft silicone, a razor knife cutting against a PVC pipe edge as a guide, etc, but none of them work all that well, and you end up with rough or wavy edges or have to try and recut a small strip to try and get it smoother, which usually just makes it worse.

Enter the Redback - made by an Australian company, it's an awesome tool for precision cutting silicone hoses up to 4" in diameter. It clamps in your vice, gives you various sized guide discs, a precision arm that's adjustable for the length of hose you want to cut, and uses a razor knife blade that you engage with the hose, then rotate the hose to make the cut. I can't tell you what a nice design and quality piece this is with anodized aluminum, a case that neatly organizes the two sets of discs (a top set and bottom set to support the hose at both ends), the guide pins, the assembly itself, etc - it's just first rate.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1b8353c6e6.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8945954dce.jpg


....but most importantly, it works. and works well !


https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7d29b72517.jpg

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...35152a6a1d.jpg


I had to cut both sides of each reducer to keep the transition section centered between the two ends and checking the fitment, I ended up trimming more from the smaller end and less from the larger end, as they fit together better that way. When doing the measuring, I wanted the finished product to be just a little bit longer than the OEM ones, but just 1-2mm or so. The leg flange is 19.68mm and the manifold flange is 23.07mm so together, that's 42.75mm and the OEM coupler length is exactly 42.75mm, but the two parts have a slight gap between them when installed. Making the couplers just a little longer would have them fully cover the leg and manifold flanges, but not exceed past the lip on the leg flange, and go all the way to the side of the manifold body. Since the silicone hose is slipperier than the OEM rubber pieces, I wanted to do this to help keep them from sliding in either direction due to the high pressure air of the forced induction system.

What I ended up with is 8 perfectly sized couplers, with smooth and straight cuts - no way I would have been able to achieve this type of consistency and quality without this tool.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...56b18f8189.jpg


https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c72a083e73.jpg


https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c6e8ff3cfc.jpg


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...100bc1dd41.jpg


Don't worry, there are 8 of them - one was still on the cutter in this picture
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...869bf16abf.jpg


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1113be7fd8.jpg


Pegasus Racing Supplies is the one that sells Redback tool (I discovered them when looking for a metal canister oil filter cutting tool to inspect my filter media for debris during oil changes). Is it kind of expensive for a hose cutter - yup, but the quality is worth the price, and if you do this type of work on your cars, you'll look forward to the next project where you're cutting hoses to fit, instead of dreading that part of it.


Back to core engine stuff tomorrow.

928 GT R 05-17-2019 09:58 AM

Sweet! Lots of great details coming from your documentation.

Thank you for taking the time to post all of this.

Petza914 05-17-2019 10:17 AM


Originally Posted by 928 GT R (Post 15846793)
Sweet! Lots of great details coming from your documentation.

Thank you for taking the time to post all of this.

I'd rather be driving it than working on it, but since I have to be working on it, figured I might as well post up what I'm doing in case it helps someone else with a question down the road or lets one of the experts see a critical mistake I've made that I can correct before going further.

Once the new 5-8 cam spacer arrives today (both my other ones were grooved), I'll be putting the pulley onto that side and finishing the timing and porken tensioner install.


From a relationship perspective, am I correct in my understanding that this is how things should be put together so that simultaneously:
The Crankshaft is set at TDC - red plastic arrow pointing to the line between the T|C on the harmonic balancer
1-4 cam pulley aligned with it's arrow mark
5-8 cam pulley aligned with it's arrow mark
Distributor set with rotor pointing to it's thin alignment mark, which is also the position for cylinder 1

Rotating the motor around a couple times it should always come back to this state, correct?

When I try to manually rotate the 1-4 cam pulley to align the mark on the pulley with the mark on the end plate, it feels like I'm compressing a valve spring and it does not want to stay there. I know once the belt is on and under tension that it will stay there, but is that phenomenon correct before the the belt is installed. Both the crank and the 5-8 pulley will align with their marks without that same resistance phenomenon.

Also I've read that the 1-4 pulley mark might not exactly align with the mark on the cam tower cap. If not perfectly aligned do I want the mark on the pulley to be indexed slightly to the counterclockwise side of the arrow on the cap or slightly to the clockwise side of the arrow on the cap, or should I get an offset woodruff key from Carl at 928MS to make it perfectly aligned, if it's not?

Thanks for the help.

karl ruiter 05-17-2019 05:11 PM

The WSM has a fairly lame discussion on the actual timing belt install. I prefer the one in the porkensioner manual: http://liftbars.com/docs/PKT-S_install.pdf

Its been a while since I did my 16V car, but I did my S4 a few weeks ago, and I was really surprised that I did not have to fight the valve springs much to get the belt on. Some of it may depend on where you do the installation. I think I may have done it at TDC before and this time I did it at 45BDTC or whatever the other point is.

Petza914 05-17-2019 05:25 PM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15847962)
The WSM has a fairly lame discussion on the actual timing belt install. I prefer the one in the porkensioner manual: http://liftbars.com/docs/PKT-S_install.pdf

Its been a while since I did my 16V car, but I did my S4 a few weeks ago, and I was really surprised that I did not have to fight the valve springs much to get the belt on. Some of it may depend on where you do the installation. I think I may have done it at TDC before and this time I did it at 45BDTC or whatever the other point is.

Karl,

Thanks, but with my engine not having a belt on it or a distributor installed, and the cams having been removed, how do I use any of the alignment marks for pulleys, distributor, etc if I set the crank at 45 BTDC? Don't those only all line up at TDC, especially the distributor for spark timing?

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-17-2019 05:44 PM

Hi Pete.
Your description of valve tension on the 1-4 cam sounds about right. Once the belt is installed, you should get everything into synch, just as you described. It took me a couple of tries, but I was able to get my belt on a tooth that aligned all three markers, to my limit of discernment. Turn it several times and confirm, but I think you will be fine.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 05-17-2019 08:35 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15848040)
Hi Pete.
Your description of valve tension on the 1-4 cam sounds about right. Once the belt is installed, you should get everything into synch, just as you described. It took me a couple of tries, but I was able to get my belt on a tooth that aligned all three markers, to my limit of discernment. Turn it several times and confirm, but I think you will be fine.
Good luck,
Dave

Dave, thanks for the confirmation. That's the plan for tonight and I'm going to spin up the oil pump with a drill before installing the timing belt.

GregBBRD 05-17-2019 09:14 PM


Originally Posted by NelaK (Post 15843495)
I don't know anything about engine design so this might be a stupid question but what about the Cayenne engine? I vaguely recall that they have a similar setup... Along with a tendency to kill themselves with bore scoring and a lot of piston slap.

I was told that when Smokey Yunick was working with GM, he made them produce some offset wrist pin pistons. This, of course, required right and left pistons. The juice wasn't worth the squeeze to GM and they quickly stopped doing this.

I believe that the Germans are thick headed enough to always use pistons with offset pins.....because that is what they have been doing....forever.

So, unless there are two separate part numbers for pistons, you can take it to the bank that both the 997 engines and the Cayenne piston failures (in cold weather) are primarily caused by the improper piston geometry on one side of the engine. Porsche "got away" with doing this by iron plating the pistons that went into the Alusil bores (up to the new generation of engines), but as soon as the "bean counters" took over engineering and used "Ferroprinted" pistons, the "gig" was over.

Added content: Years ago, I tried a set of "Ferroprinted" Mahle 968 pistons in a 928 engine. It ran for a couple of days until the Ferroprint flaked off and ruined the bore. Mahle said it wasn't their problem....want to bet they are telling Porsche the same thing?

Again, the "Common Sense Department" would have known this and saved everybody millions of dollars.

Petza914 05-17-2019 09:53 PM

So, I put a few quarts of oil into the pan, a filter on, and spun up the oil filter with a drill. Looking in through the water bridge assembly hole, oil is flowing out of the crankshaft bearings.

Unfortunately oil is also seeping from the bottom of the head gaskets on cylinders 1,5, and 6.

What do I do now? I can check the tension of the top head bolts, but where are the bottom ones and will tightening them resolve the issue or do the heads need to come off and new gaskets be installed, where I have to undo a bunch of what I've already done?

Any chance these gaskets will swell back up and reseal themselves?

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8d4de8f5b2.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7eb7fd0957.jpg

Petza914 05-17-2019 10:16 PM

Previous post might be a false alarm. I wiped off what I saw in those pictures and spun the pump a good bit more and there is no new evidence of oil there.

I'm now thinking that maybe when the motor was upside down and I was working on the pan that some oil may have settled there and that's what I saw when I was looking for leaks. I'll spin it a few more times to see if there's any new evidence of oil there, but don't see any on either side now.

🤞

GregBBRD 05-17-2019 10:37 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15848625)
Previous post might be a false alarm. I wiped off what I saw in those pictures and spun the pump a good bit more and there is no new evidence of oil there.

I'm now thinking that maybe when the motor was upside down and I was working on the pan that some oil may have settled there and that's what I saw when I was looking for leaks. I'll spin it a few more times to see if there's any new evidence of oil there, but don't see any on either side now.

🤞

Look carefully....that "bulge" to the right of the exhaust stud (in your first picture) is the oil passage to the cam carrier.

You need to spin the pump enough to build up pressure to check for leaks, BTW.

Petza914 05-18-2019 12:32 AM

I spun it a bunch more and didn't see any more oil in any of those areas, or any others - phew!

So I proceeded with the timing belt and tensioner installation.

Belt on - everything at TDC and aligned
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6456bb3b13.jpg

Turned the motor over 4 revolutions then took these pics.

5-8
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...533c37087c.jpg

1-4
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e571d5b3c5.jpg

Distributor
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2ddaa6a384.jpg

Harmonic Balancer
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a97beba69e.jpg

Then had an expert help me by turning the motor over 2 more times and checked all the marks again. Looked just like the above.
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e027066875.jpg
X
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1ee4708b29.jpg

So we put the covers on.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...192b6525bd.jpg


Motor is going back into the car in the morning and then I'll start reassembling all the accessories.

Above timing alignment photos are good, right?

Rob Edwards 05-18-2019 01:24 PM

With the crank at TDC, the cam marks look perfect. I'm less confident about the distributor, my understanding is the rotor should point straight forward. I think you're a distributor gear tooth or two behind. But maybe it's different for L-jet motors, I don't know.

jej3 05-18-2019 02:03 PM

Keep rolling, Pete!

Petza914 05-18-2019 03:08 PM


Originally Posted by Rob Edwards (Post 15849618)
With the crank at TDC, the cam marks look perfect. I'm less confident about the distributor, my understanding is the rotor should point straight forward. I think you're a distributor gear tooth or two behind. But maybe it's different for L-jet motors, I don't know.

There's a mark on the rim of the distributor that doesn't show in the photo - the one that shows is a scratch. The rotor points right at that mark you can't see with the crank at TDC. The rotor should point directly at the #1 contact with the crank at TDC, correct?

SwayBar 05-18-2019 04:23 PM

Nice progress!
:cheers:

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-18-2019 07:20 PM

Looks good Pete. I see you have the dual vacuum input distributor.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 05-19-2019 03:14 AM

Productive day....
  • Motor is back in
  • Clutch is in, lubed, torqued, spacer pins removed, lower bell housing back on
  • Most heat shields are back on
  • Installed Hans' oil control baffle, the oil fill assembly, and the oil return tube
  • Installed the front and rear water bridges
  • Installed Carl's low temp thermostat
  • Installed new fuel injectors, seals, and tension rings into the spider legs today.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4461693b4a.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...41507c6dc1.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...40b1f4fe27.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c113f0c519.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c25d52f278.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...590c91362c.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...77c594ce75.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ab44b498b0.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d74f670ddc.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...324b2cdbd4.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9b1f77c33c.jpg


Also checked, and the starter will bolt up fine without any clearance issues with the oil pan studs

Majestic Moose 05-19-2019 09:12 AM

That is some serious progress, good work.

I think the starter is grounded through the mating surface of the lower bellhousing cover. I'm not sure if the bolts will be able to pass enough current. If you have a weak or no crank situation I will bet that is why and the powder coating will have to be sanded off that area.

Bertrand Daoust 05-19-2019 09:46 AM

Beautiful.

Keep the good work, both of you! :thumbup:

Kevin in Atlanta 05-19-2019 10:21 AM

Nicely done. You dropped it in with the bellhousing and clutch installed?

Petza914 05-19-2019 10:28 AM


Originally Posted by Majestic Moose (Post 15850963)
That is some serious progress, good work.

I think the starter is grounded through the mating surface of the lower bellhousing cover. I'm not sure if the bolts will be able to pass enough current. If you have a weak or no crank situation I will bet that is why and the powder coating will have to be sanded off that area.

Thanks for the tip. I'll take a look at that today.

Petza914 05-19-2019 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 15851056)
Nicely done. You dropped it in with the bellhousing and clutch installed?

Kevin.,

Yes, it came out with the bellhousing on - figured it would go back in the same way. Just the bellhousing though - I installed the clutch again from underneath. With my Z06 torque tube, there is virtually no space between the torque tube and upper bell housing and am not sure I would have been able to get it attached with the alignment pins the other way.

I also had the motor brackets installed on the mounts already so once the motor was in place, fattened it with the 4 long bolts from underneath.

The leveler on the hoist helps a lot, but it would have been better if I had set the chains longer and had the leveler handle on the hoist side rather than the car side.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-19-2019 11:54 AM

Beautiful, Pete. This engine looks great.
Thanks for sharing,
Dave

Petza914 05-19-2019 02:42 PM


Originally Posted by Majestic Moose (Post 15850963)
That is some serious progress, good work.

I think the starter is grounded through the mating surface of the lower bellhousing cover. I'm not sure if the bolts will be able to pass enough current. If you have a weak or no crank situation I will bet that is why and the powder coating will have to be sanded off that area.

I ground the powdercoat off of the inner flange since my hi-torque tarter housing also makes a little contact on part of it. I also thread chased the powder out of the mounting holes. We'll try that and see if we get a good strong crank, or if I need to remove some of the coating from the mounting face of the bell housing too.

Working on hanging all the accessories today. Power steering pump and alternator are in place. Moving on to the PS lines and reservoir, then the a/c compressor, then might do a wake boarding run witb the kids before diving back in after dinner.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6ade6b5515.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...aa8051d74f.jpg

SwayBar 05-19-2019 03:10 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15851529)

Do the teeth on the flywheel look worn, or is it just the picture?

Petza914 05-19-2019 03:26 PM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15851579)
Do the teeth on the flywheel look worn, or is it just the picture?

I think it's the picture. I've never had a problem with the starter slipping or anything like that, but take a look. Here's are pics of the flywheel when it was out of the car.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c161031767.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...55a0d155d7.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ccfb8bd62a.jpg

Petza914 05-20-2019 01:49 AM

Dabbled a bit more this evening.

Installed a new clutch slave cylinder and Greg Brown pressure line for it

Mounted the supercharger mounting plate and started routing some of the wires and plugged in a few things

Mounted the A/C compressor

I"m not doing any belts until the end so I can leave the crank pulleys off and have more space to work on the front of the motor.

Also realized that in buying replacements for my aged power steering lines, that I bought two presure lines of different types - one has the banjo fittings and both ends and the other has the banjo fitting at the rack end and male threaded fitting for the pump at the other end which is the one I need, but I don't have a return line so Roger is working on that tomorrow. Unfortunately for me, the line in did the DEI Firesleeving to is the dual banjo one, so I'll be adding this brand new line with fire sleeving to my parts for sale thread when I'm done with this project. I've ordered another DEI kit to do the proper line that is already installed in the car, but it's coming back out again

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...aa1b8190a2.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5946cb08bc.jpg

Petza914 05-21-2019 01:37 PM

Installed:
  • the knock sensor and ground for it,
  • the power steering reservoir and connected it to the pump with a new supply hose,
  • Scraped the crappy looking labels off the high performance silver coil and polished it a bit, then installed that
  • Took out the coolant reservoir to clean it out. Tested the coolant level sensor for continuity with the float in both the up and down positions and got nothing. Does the sensor need to be submerged to successfully test it or should it have had continuity between the top terminals with the float in one position or the other?
  • Started reconnecting some coolant lines like the one under the reservoir that goes to the supercharger intercooler
  • Reattached the dual electric fans to the aluminum radiator. Had a tube leaking and had to send it off for repair, and they didn't want any accessories on it. Straightened all the, crooked fins too for maximum airflow through and cooling effect. Radiator won't go back in until close to last to leave more room to work.
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e72e4070f6.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4bb05d7e10.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...52e0bc9697.jpg

Petza914 05-24-2019 03:46 AM

Returned from a business trip tonight and got a couple things done.

Polished and reinstalled the coolant reservoir with the new level sensor. It tests the same as the one I removed so either they're both bad or probably both good and they only work when sitting in fluid.

Connected the coolant hoses associated with the reservoir, the Y Pipe along the side of the engine bay and the front smaller diameter coolant hose.

Installed the crankcase ventilation system

Checked and adjusted the distributor position with the motor at TDC and have it pointing directly to the #1 contact on the cap. Installed new rotor and new Bosch cap.

More to come tomorrow.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2b5721bad6.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9fbe45da29.jpg

Petza914 05-25-2019 03:06 AM

Had a pretty productive day today, mostly under the car.

Front bell housing and pulleys are installed and torqued to 218 ft lbs.

Reinstalled the clutch slave cylinder after having to take it loose to install the flywheel lock to torque the crank bolt, then pressurized the brake system with my Motive pressure bleeder and bled the new slave cylinder. Clutch feels super smooth now.

Fire sleeved the correct power steering hose and installed it at both ends. Ran the sleeving down to the last 90 degree bend and left it open so in the event of a leak or burst, it can escape it the bottom away from the heat rather than burst the sleeve. Also received the emergency eBay PS return line Roger helped me source, since a new one from Germany was delayed, but unfortunately, it wasn't as represented in the auction photos and the rubber was cracking. Without any other options and the SITM deadline fast approaching, I used a tubing Cutter to cut the line just below the metal to rubber junction and installed some high pressure hose (just in case), even though this is the low pressure return line, then installed that one into the car too. All the lines are connected to the pump, rack, and reservoir, but I haven't filled the reservoir yet, just in case something needs to come apart again.

Installed the starter and connected the wiring.

Connected the wiring to the alternator.

Installed the painted exhaust heat shields, the polished Y-pipe, and the adapter for the SS round tube headers I bought. I don't think this one was made correctly as the holes in the two flanges are indexed slightly relative to each other, yet were too close to allow for two sets of bolts or nuts to meet in the center of the adapter. I put it on the drill press and made the holes larger by a couple of sizes, which then let me pass long bolts through the Y-pipe flange, the adapter, and the header flange to tighten all of them together. It's the only way I could figure out how to make it work.


Tomorrow I'm hoping to get a good bit of the up top work done, like the fuel injection, supercharger, intake, etc so I can then start tuning later this weekend or early next week.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0081debba6.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a9ea7a0b76.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dfe78456a2.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...588efd61d1.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c035c00142.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3024400378.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...baf819d819.jpg


https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b84e81d9fb.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8438c448f4.jpg

Petza914 05-25-2019 02:40 PM

Accessory belts are in and tensioned.

K-Jet setup is in place with the two primary fuel lines connected.

That took a little work to get it to clear the knock sensor I installed in the valley. Had to swap the position of the knock sensor and the ground, which is a little less than ideal as the knock sensor is now at the end instead of the center, and used slightly taller isolation mounts for the fueling module. I don't think that will cause an issue with the manifold.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f75f2247bb.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a31ff9e30e.jpg

Bertrand Daoust 05-25-2019 09:05 PM

Beautiful (again!) :thumbup:

Petza914 05-26-2019 01:39 PM

Got 2 of the 3 new Greg Brown fuel supply lines installed. After struggling with different combinations for a few hours last night and not finding a combination that works since it seems to need a smaller fitting on the end and another 90 degree bend like the cold start line has for my application, so I used the cold start line in that spot to keep the line profile as low as possible at the front of the motor and reused my old cold start injector line until I can sort it out.

Traced and hooked up a number of the vacuum lines.

That's it for today as we're hitting the lake in the 95 degree heat.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8dd86f34fe.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a2e79bc194.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...97a9bc533c.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-26-2019 05:49 PM

Looks great, Pete. Don't forget to hook up the retard line to the distributor per <1982 TB connections. (The one way valve too).
Thanks for posting,
Dave

928 GT R 05-26-2019 11:46 PM

WOW!

This is one heck of a thread. I can not wait to see this car in person!

Go Pete Go!

>

Petza914 05-27-2019 02:52 AM

Thanks guys.

Power steering fluid is filled and not leaking (though the pump hasn't run yet), motor oil is topped up for the first start.

Supercharger is reinstalled, along with the belt and tensioned, as well as a couple coolant hoses

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4ca544a69f.jpg


Here's a question though.. The fitting on my old motor that feeds the heater core had a vacuum line fitting on the top of it that had a hose connected to it. That hose was T'd into another small diameter hose that runs along the passenger side fender wall under the coolant reservoir.

The fitting I modified and installed on the new motor (because the old one was corroded and nasty) doesn't have this vacuum line fitting. Anyone know what this is for and can I just block off the vacuum line that used to go there or connect it somewhere else?

Here are pictures of the old fitting with the vacuum port, the new fitting and the unconnected hose in the car.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...73e16f9a2f.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...c132f34ad8.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...274701fee6.jpg

Petza914 05-28-2019 03:47 AM

The radiator with the pull fans is reinstalled and all the coolant system hoses are connected and tightened. I'll vacuum fill the system tomorrow with the Airlift using a 50/50 mix of Dexcool and Distilled Water.

A large portion of the intake is installed too as I had to do some of this in conjunction with the cooling system due to access.

Also installed and connected the supercharger blow off valve.

I think I need to lower the K-Jet setup though as I don't like the offset between the spider legs and intake manifold when I did a quick test fit on a couple. I've ordered some various vibration absorbing mounts and spacers in different combinations so I can set it as low as possible and still clear the knock sensor in the valley.

Lower cross brace was installed last night too. Upper cross brace will be one of the last things to go on so I don't have to work around it.

Reinstalled my previous extended dipstick since it's very difficult to get at the normal one with the supercharger installed.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d3624068d6.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b9a09a1d1f.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a3076a2e24.jpg

NelaK 05-28-2019 04:08 AM

I vaguely recall this started as a head gasket replacement... At this point you're just shaming anyone else that wants to do a head gasket without redoing the entire engine compartment.

Petza914 05-28-2019 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by NelaK (Post 15869694)
I vaguely recall this started as a head gasket replacement... At this point you're just shaming anyone else that wants to do a head gasket without redoing the entire engine compartment.

Yeah, sorry about that. We could rename it the WYAIT thread.

Petza914 05-29-2019 04:34 AM

Use the Airlift to vacuum fill the cooling system, which went great. Pulled vacuum to 25 on the gauge and had 5 gallons of Dexcool and Distilled water in a 5 gallon bucket with the feed line and it took about 4.5 gallons. I'll top that up after the first drive.


The bigger news is that the Spider intake is installed with the custom silicone couplers marrying the larger diameter Euro legs to the standard intake manifold.

Took me about 6 hours to get to this point. When I test fit the legs to the body, because I had raised the body to clear the knock sensor, I was about 12mm off on the leg ends meeting up to the body ports :(

I took most of the fueling loose again, changed the way the knock sensor was installed, which let me lower the fueling setup by about 8mm using some shorter vibration dampening mounts that arrived today.

Next I measured the large coupler that joins the spider body to the throttle body and realized there was some space to be gained in that coupler leaving only about 1mm of clearance between the 2 metal flanges that meet in the coupler vs the 4mm or so designed into the OEM one. So, out came the Redback Cutter again and a scrap of 3" silicone hose from my intake projects and I cut a perfectly straight shorter coupler which got me to 11mm of the 12mm I needed. Figured that was close enough but forgot to factor in the about 1mm for the gaskets - perfect.

Here's a shot of the old coupler and from the oil ring inside, you can see the gap that existed between the two flanges. Then a picture of the new silicone coupler installed.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a029b967d7.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6107d670e5.jpg



Of course putting it back in I pinched the hard line for the boost gauge so had to loosen the mounting bolts a bit to free and reroute that, but I got it worked out.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ec5dc1fe4f.jpg

Tomorrow (today actually), I'll connect fuel lines, plug wires, the intercooler hoses, the battery, and maybe turn the key to see what happens.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-29-2019 09:45 AM

Looks great, Pete. I'm kind of jealous.
:thumbup:
Dave

Petza914 05-29-2019 09:55 AM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15872351)
Looks great, Pete. I'm kind of jealous.
:thumbup:
Dave

Thanks Dave. No need to be jealous. You could do it in a couple months too - just have to decide your new bedtime is somewhere between 2-3 AM :)

Chris Lockhart 05-29-2019 10:11 AM

I am truly in awe of how much you've accomplished in such a short period of time. Absolutely amazing.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-29-2019 10:18 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15872379)
Thanks Dave. No need to be jealous. You could do it in a couple months too - just have to decide your new bedtime is somewhere between 2-3 AM :)

You're right, Pete.
It's amazing how well we work, when a project grabs us. I've been there too. My wife thinks I'm crazy during those periods.
Thanks,
Dave

Petza914 05-30-2019 02:39 AM

REASSEMBLY IS COMPLETE....

.... except for the hood and cowl cover as I need to wash the underside of the hood from the coolant steam that is all over it from the overheating event.

I reconnected the battery and nothing went pop LOL so that's good news. Cycling the key to the accessory position also turned on the heat exchanger fan and pump, as it should. That also ran the fuel pump and showed me 1 fuel fitting that I forgot to tighten - it was the old line I used from the fuel distributor to the cold start valve at the FD side. Tightened it up, cycled the key again and all dry.

Tomorrow, I'll fire it up and see what works, what doesn't, what leaks, what doesn't, set the timing and if all goes well put a few miles on it so I can top up the fluids, do an oil change to swap the BR40 oil for DT50 and install new spark plugs.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b4b2cbc790.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...787a9ff7b2.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...eacdae7a49.jpg

Rob Edwards 05-30-2019 03:02 AM

That is a metric ton of work, looking good! Fingers crossed for startup tomorrow.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 05-30-2019 10:35 PM

Very nice, Pete. I also put vacuum caps on my silicone hose clamps to save my skin. Your car looks fantastic.
Thanks,
Dave

Petza914 05-30-2019 11:37 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15876622)
Very nice, Pete. I also put vacuum caps on my silicone hose clamps to save my skin. Your car looks fantastic.
Thanks,
Dave

It may look fantastic, but I can't get it running right. AFRs are jumping all over the place. Sometimes it goes totally lean and just dies. Other times it goes totally rich and then dies. Other times it seems like it's running out of fuel. I've tried timing numbers from 20-30 DBTDC. I rebaselined the mixture screw at 9.5 turns from fully CCW. I put the Harmonic Dampener at TDC and popped the distributor cap and it's pointing directly at #1, I and put in new spark plugs. I tried a fuel pump jumper and a different FPR and no joy, and this is all without ever leaving the garage, so don't even know what issues will show up under load and boost.

I didn't do any disassembly of the k-jet system - just moved it over from one car to the other, and realize this motor may have different fueling requirements, but I should have been in the ballpark.

It turns over much longer than the other engine used to before firing up and it doesn't run very smoothly once it does, then it fixes itself and the AFR becomes 12-13 and stays there a bit, then starts walking in one direction or the other until it dies.

So, we'll be taking the 911 to SITM in the morning but I'm also not really sure how I'm going to resolve this prior to the Rendezvous. Thinking about trying to sweet talk Carl into heading for Atlanta a couple days early to swing by and work his magic as the other motor he set up was superb - fast start, rock stead idle, good AFR numbers, etc.

SwayBar 05-31-2019 10:12 AM

To simplify, I would disconnect the intercooler feed to the engine intake in order to work-on and get the engine to run correctly NA first.

Once that's accomplished, hook-up the supercharger feed to the engine intake.

Carl Fausett 05-31-2019 10:39 AM


To simplify, I would disconnect the intercooler feed to the engine intake in order to work-on and get the engine to run correctly NA first.

Once that's accomplished, hook-up the supercharger feed to the engine intake.
This is good advice. Disconnect the supercharger (you can leave it mounted, just remove the belt) Start with it being naturally aspirated and get it running right before boosting it. The supercharger masks tuning problems and can make troubleshooting difficult. When running right, hook it back up.


It may look fantastic, but I can't get it running right. AFRs are jumping all over the place. Sometimes it goes totally lean and just dies. Other times it goes totally rich and then dies. Other times it seems like it's running out of fuel. I've tried timing numbers from 20-30 DBTDC. I rebaselined the mixture screw at 9.5 turns from fully CCW. I put the Harmonic Dampener at TDC and popped the distributor cap and it's pointing directly at #1, I and put in new spark plugs. I tried a fuel pump jumper and a different FPR and no joy, and this is all without ever leaving the garage, so don't even know what issues will show up under load and boost.

I didn't do any disassembly of the k-jet system - just moved it over from one car to the other, and realize this motor may have different fueling requirements, but I should have been in the ballpark.

Sounds like you transferred the fuel distributor from the 4.7 to your motor. Chances are good it has varnish in it from the old gas and being stagnent. Injectors and injector lines are suspect too. Diagnose by swapping in your known-good 4.5L fuel distributor and injectors.

Also: check the WUR if you are using the one from the 4.7 They are mis-named, they are THE control regulator on a K-Jet and critical that it be working right. Again, swap in your known-good one from the 4.5L to see if it reacts better to that.

Petza914 05-31-2019 02:56 PM

Thanks for the responses. I didn't use any fueling from the 4.7L motor (didn't buy that with it) - it was all the stuff that ran perfectly from my 4.5 so no varnish issues

Fuel injectors and lines are brand new. WUR is the one from my 4.5 and that seems to work, as when the car is cold it fires up and runs the best, then I think the WUR shuts down and the engine starts relying on the other settings which is when it starts misbehaving.

The intercooler does complicate the issue as it makes the mixture screw impossible to reach. If I pull off the intercooler then the supercharger wouldn't be doing anything even with the belt attached. Could it not be tuned this way with the metering assembly just open to atmosphere?

BC 05-31-2019 03:08 PM

Maybe try and make the engine run normally first? I always thought the ID of the SS lines was larger, thereby changing the tune requirements.

Things are never as they seem, and CIS is super tricky.

997TTEQNY 05-31-2019 03:42 PM

Cant believe how much progress has been made in such a short period

Amazing

Carl Fausett 05-31-2019 05:39 PM

Yes, you can sure tune it that way, many believe that is the best way. Don't think that its all in the 3mm mixture screw, it isn't. Check your ignition advance and idle air bleed screws as well.

Have a look at this description, its pretty good although its for a 911: http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...-analyzer.html

Then there's the bible: http://www.type17.ch/downloads/Injec...p%20Manual.pdf

karl ruiter 05-31-2019 05:46 PM

Totally normal. There seems to always be room for something you did not expect or something to be not quite right.
There is an orderly progression that will always find it, but I would start by:
-triple checking the timing. I think the dist can go in wrong such that it is 180 out.
-check the control pressures. Always a good idea. Fast and easy.
-mason jar test the injection system. Pull the injectors, cut 8 lengths of fuel line, slip one over each injector, and run to 8 mason jars. Jumper the fuel pump, and move the control plate around by hand while watching the fuel flow.

GregBBRD 05-31-2019 10:06 PM

It wouldn't be any "fun" if it just started up and ran perfectly.....what would you do with yourself?

BC 06-01-2019 03:13 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15878817)
It wouldn't be any "fun" if it just started up and ran perfectly.....what would you do with yourself?


where is the like button.

Petza914 06-01-2019 09:04 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15878817)
It wouldn't be any "fun" if it just started up and ran perfectly.....what would you do with yourself?

Um, wash it and drive it to the event, which would have been quite a bit of fun.

Petza914 06-01-2019 09:16 AM


Originally Posted by karl ruiter (Post 15878317)
:
-triple checking the timing. I think the dist can go in wrong such that it is 180 out.

How can the distributor go in 180 degrees out. It has the lock down tab that the bolt goes through. Don't you rotate it before installation so that once installed the rotor points the scribe mark on the top edge of the distributor housing? When you press it in, because of the angle of the gears it rotates clockwise as they mesh, which brings up a question.

With the motor at TDC, should the rotor be on the scribe mark before installing, which actually makes it clocked past it when installed, or should it be set slightly before the scribe mark so that it's on the scribe mark once installed?

Also, where in the slot does the lock down bolt usually end up when the timing is correct. Mine was toward the front of the slot but not all the way before I removed it.

Majestic Moose 06-01-2019 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15879383)
How can the distributor go in 180 degrees out. It has the lock down tab that the bolt goes through. Don't you rotate it before installation so that once installed the rotor points the scribe mark on the top edge of the distributor housing? When you press it in, because of the angle of the gears it rotates clockwise as they mesh, which brings up a question.

With the motor at TDC, should the rotor be on the scribe mark before installing, which actually makes it clocked past it when installed, or should it be set slightly before the scribe mark so that it's on the scribe mark once installed?

Also, where in the slot does the lock down bolt usually end up when the timing is correct. Mine was toward the front of the slot but not all the way before I removed it.

It is not possible to install the distributor 180 degrees out but the cap can be. Once the distributor is pushed down home the rotor should point directly at the mark (no. 1 cylinder once cap is on) and that should be close enough to have the engine running.

Petza914 06-01-2019 10:33 AM

Might be a dumb question, but how many times does the distributor rotor rotate per revolution of the harmonic dampener? Is it a 1:1 relationship or could it be that I need to rotate the engine around one more time and then set the distributor position. Maybe this is what was meant by it being 180 degrees out.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-01-2019 11:13 AM

Hi Pete,
Remember that distributor has vacuum ports on both sides of the diaphragm. If only one is connected (I can see the advance hose), it will act unopposed. This may give a bad timing curve vs rpm. If your timing light says it's reasonable, then this is not the problem. Just saying.
Good luck,
Dave

Carl Fausett 06-01-2019 12:12 PM

Pete: WSM, Volume 1A, page 28-8


https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d0de9235ba.png

Petza914 06-01-2019 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15879658)

Yep, that's how I have mine setup. That's the little scribe mark on the top of the distributor lip I was referring to, so it's not that.

At TDC both cam pulleys were on their marks and the distributor was on it's mark.

Petza914 06-01-2019 12:41 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15879564)
Hi Pete,
Remember that distributor has vacuum ports on both sides of the diaphragm. If only one is connected (I can see the advance hose), it will act unopposed. This may give a bad timing curve vs rpm. If your timing light says it's reasonable, then this is not the problem. Just saying.
Good luck,
Dave

Thanks Dave. I haven't hooked up a line to the retard side, but have tried it with the advance line both connected and disconnected.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-01-2019 12:45 PM

Sounds good Pete. I figured you had t covered.
Best of luck,
Dave

Carl Fausett 06-01-2019 05:26 PM


It may look fantastic, but I can't get it running right. AFRs are jumping all over the place. Sometimes it goes totally lean and just dies. Other times it goes totally rich and then dies. Other times it seems like it's running out of fuel. I've tried timing numbers from 20-30 DBTDC. I rebaselined the mixture screw at 9.5 turns from fully CCW. I put the Harmonic Dampener at TDC and popped the distributor cap and it's pointing directly at #1, I and put in new spark plugs. I tried a fuel pump jumper and a different FPR and no joy, and this is all without ever leaving the garage, so don't even know what issues will show up under load and boost.

I didn't do any disassembly of the k-jet system - just moved it over from one car to the other, and realize this motor may have different fueling requirements, but I should have been in the ballpark.

It turns over much longer than the other engine used to before firing up and it doesn't run very smoothly once it does, then it fixes itself and the AFR becomes 12-13 and stays there a bit, then starts walking in one direction or the other until it dies.
Read the symptoms you reported above again, and I don't suspect ignition advance very much, or it wouldn't "fix itself and the AFR becomes 12-13 and stays there a bit". So I'm back to a fuel or vacuum issue. For the hardstart, confirm the cold start injector is working correctly and spraying. For the running poorly...and then getting better, I suspect air bubbles in the injector lines and the injector system (fuel distributor and injectors) because you said the injector lines and injectors are new. Those air bubbles can take a while to work themselves out and you can rush to judgement thinking it is other things until they do. Operate the throttle by hand and see if you can keep the motor lit for a longer period of time and see if it doesn't keep getting better and better. The other symptom seems like the WUR is missing an electric connection or a vacuum connection.

Hard to diagnose from here! You'll get it.

Petza914 06-02-2019 09:40 AM

Looking for some clarification on the vacuum ports for the new distributor that has both advance and retard function, which my other did not.
  1. Am I correct in that the original 4.5L distributor with a single vacuum port was a retard port, and not an advance port?
  2. Does the retard port retard the timing when it senses vacuum or pressure (lack of vacuum)
  3. I believe the vacuum line on my 4.5L distributor connects to a port next to the idle control screw, correct?
  4. On the 4.7L distributor, the retard port is actually on the back side and the port on the other side (where the port on the 4.5L distributor is) is actually the vacuum advance port, correct?
  5. Can I connect the one vacuum line I was using on the 4.5L distributor that's next to the idle speed screw to the Retard port, which is now on the back side of the vacuum diaphram of the 4.7L distributor and have it work the same way as before with nothing connected to the advance port yet.
  6. This creates a baseline

  1. Now, considering I will have positive pressure from the supercharger to factor in also, how do I need to modify the vacuum line connections to account for timing retard when under boost. I have the line that comes off the front of the intake manifold which is where they blow off valve is connected and the vac/boost gauge gets it's info. Can I or should I add another T to this line for a vacuum line and should that connect to the advance port of the 4.7L distributor or to the retard port
  2. With the advance and retard ports, do they respond to both or either vacuum and positive pressure, where on the retard port, vacuum will retard the timing, but positive pressure would advance the timing instead or do I have this backwards and that's what would happen on the advance port?
  3. How should I hook up the old vacuum line that went to the retard port on my 4.5L distributor to the 4.7L distributor? How should I hook up and from where a line that goes to the other port?
Thanks for the help.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-02-2019 10:04 AM

Hi Pete,
According to WSM Section 24 pages 22 and 23, the retard line goes to the front of the TB next to the idle speed screw, label c, and the advance line goes to the almost exact location in the opposite, rear of the TB, label d. You can experiment with your distributor by applying Mitivac vacuum to its two connections. The top one advances and the bottom one retards. (You should verify this.) You should tee a check valve on the retard line so it cannot develop positive pressure (it will act as a 0 psi mini blow off valve). That will allow boost pressure on the advance side of the diaphragm, thus retarding the timing, with no positive pressure on the retard line to cancel it out. You can simulate this boost condition with the Mitivac, and watch with a timing light.
BTW this is my interpretation of Hacker's design, and I use it on my 928MS Stage II setup.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 06-02-2019 01:37 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15881164)
Hi Pete,
According to WSM Section 24 pages 22 and 23, the retard line goes to the front of the TB next to the idle speed screw, label c, and the advance line goes to the almost exact location in the opposite, rear of the TB, label d. You can experiment with your distributor by applying Mitivac vacuum to its two connections. The top one advances and the bottom one retards. (You should verify this.) You should tee a check valve on the retard line so it cannot develop positive pressure (it will act as a 0 psi mini blow off valve). That will allow boost pressure on the advance side of the diaphragm, thus retarding the timing, with no positive pressure on the retard line to cancel it out. You can simulate this boost condition with the Mitivac, and watch with a timing light.
BTW this is my interpretation of Hacker's design, and I use it on my 928MS Stage II setup.
Good luck,
Dave

Thanks Dave. I have the check valve you referred me to and may try to take a look at this again today now that I'm back.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-02-2019 01:52 PM

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...71e8dd4ed2.jpg
Here's a sketch, Pete.

Petza914 06-02-2019 01:54 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15881529)

Perfect! Thanks again.

Petza914 06-02-2019 11:42 PM

I hooked up the distributor retard port per Dave's diagram.

I also got some input from Jim Doerr on how to create a starting setting for the mixture screw on the K-Jet. I fully leaned the mixture screw (CCW) until it stopped, then jumpered the fuel pump relay, an opened the mixture screw (CW) until I heard the gas squealing, then closed it CCW until the squealing ceased, which took about 1 turn.

I'm still struggling with the advance connection for the distributor as I had Ron AirtekHVAC look at his 82 Euro that has K-Jet and and a vacuum advance and retard distributor and his advance line is coming off the most passenger side port on the throttle body on the side opposite the idle screw and where the retard line is connected.

However, on my car that port was previously used to link two additional vacuum diaphragms. From that throttle body port, the line goes to a side port on a secondary vacuum apparatus and then coming off a center port on that same apparatus, a line goes to the center port on a larger diaphragm apparatus and that larger one is connected to the throttle body by a large diameter line that's labeled "vacuum control port" on the drawings I've been able to find.



https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...33ad7d2d05.jpg
Here's my distributor retard port setup now. Line comes from the port next to the idle control screw



https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...badd398546.jpg
Braided stainless lines are fancy vacuum lines, not fuel. Here's the smaller vacuum apparatus fed by the port off the throttle body that Dave and Ron say should feed the distributor advance port, and then a line from it feeds that larger diaphragm apparatus (next pic)



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7c397fb1f9.jpg
Foreground is the larger vacuum apparatus connected by a large hose to the "vacuum control port"
Didn't have much time today, but did a few things

There was a capped off port right next to the one Dave and Ron say goes to their distributor advance port, so I uncovered that one and hooked my advance line to it. Don't know if that will work and those ports next to each other are multiples of the same thing or not.

So after all this, I had to get the boat trailer out of the driveway due to neighborhood covenants and it being out there since I started this engine swap project so I had to move the 928.

It started on the third set of cranking attempts and fired up rough, but actually smoothed out a bit after that and the RPMs rose to about 1,500 like they always do on a cold start. I put it into reverse and was relieved to see the car went into gear and letti g the clutch out was smooth and it engaged and backed the car up at idle speed, though the pedal engaged higher than it used to. Moved it into the driveway and shut it off.

Moved the trailer onto the lift and went to move the car back into the garage. Took 3 attempts to start again and I had to move another car and it sat in the driveway and idled for probably 2 minutes, a little rough, before dying. Restarted on the first try and I pulled it into the garage, but this time the clutch made a squealing noise and the pedal didn't feel right and the clutch didn't really disengage as cleanly as when I backed it out. What does this clutch behavior tell you I need to look at?

On the positive side, I did get the hood back on and aligned, and it closes, so it looks like a car again, and there also isn't anything dripping under the car (yet).

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5476cfc287.jpg


Thanks.

Petza914 06-03-2019 01:20 AM

Here's an unencumbered view of the 2 additional vacuum assemblies I'm talking about, and how they're connected as I pulled them from the old motor.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9045ce47c0.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...70470dc40a.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-03-2019 08:32 AM

Looks great Pete. I remember two ports very close together at the rear of the TB, and I used one of them for my advance connection. You can test with a boost gauge once you have the car running right. Your install is definitely first class.
Thanks,
Dave

Wisconsin Joe 06-04-2019 10:44 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15879383)
How can the distributor go in 180 degrees out. It has the lock down tab that the bolt goes through. Don't you rotate it before installation so that once installed the rotor points the scribe mark on the top edge of the distributor housing? When you press it in, because of the angle of the gears it rotates clockwise as they mesh, which brings up a question.

With the motor at TDC, should the rotor be on the scribe mark before installing, which actually makes it clocked past it when installed, or should it be set slightly before the scribe mark so that it's on the scribe mark once installed?

Also, where in the slot does the lock down bolt usually end up when the timing is correct. Mine was toward the front of the slot but not all the way before I removed it.


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15879478)
Might be a dumb question, but how many times does the distributor rotor rotate per revolution of the harmonic dampener? Is it a 1:1 relationship or could it be that I need to rotate the engine around one more time and then set the distributor position. Maybe this is what was meant by it being 180 degrees out.

The distributor is tied to the cam. It turns one half turn for every turn of the damper (crank). It's possible to install the distributor 180 degrees out, but it wouldn't start. At all. The spark would be firing when the piston was at the top, but when the exhaust valve was closing and the intake was opening. No fuel/air mixture, no compression, no 'kaboom'.

The distributor should be 'started' a bit early. The gears are helical cut so the rotor turns a bit as it goes 'down the gear teeth', you want the scribe mark 'dead on' when it's seated.

The lock down bolt will end up where it ends up. You may be a tooth off in one direction or another, the rotor may not be in the exact same spot (if you removed it), the gear may be on the cam 'just a bit' differently for the new motor. There's a lot of variables that will affect exactly where the bolt ends up in the slot. You are more concerned with the timing being correct.

Petza914 06-08-2019 07:22 PM

I played around with the car some more today. Put in new plugs that are properly gapped at 028.

I can make the car run, but the idle still hunts and when the idle is falling the mixture is rich. When I Rev the motor, it gets lean. If I hold the pedal to make the RPMs go to 2,500-3,000 the AFR is decent for a few seconds then gets lean, like up to 17. Either I haven't turned the mixture screw to the rich side far enough yet or something else is going on. The AFR at idle is very rich, like at 10.

The car won't Rev with a timing setting around 20 degrees BTDC and is much better at 28 degrees. Might be better still at 30 or more, but I'm concerned about going up that high.

When I shut off the motor I can also hear the fuel squeaking as it continues to run in. Does this mean the mixture screw is too rich and if so, how can it be too rich when I revit up and the AFR gauge is showing that its too lean?

I also tested it without the supercharger hooked up and it does the same thing, but the mixture at idle is even richer.

Thoughts?

On the plus side, I took the clutch out again last night and lubed the splined shaft with the proper grease and it seems to work very smoothly now, though I haven't moved it off the lift yet.

SwayBar 06-08-2019 09:12 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15895125)
On the plus side, I took the clutch out again last night and lubed the splined shaft with the proper grease and it seems to work very smoothly now, though I haven't moved it off the lift yet.

What is the proper grease? Do you have a link to it?

Petza914 06-08-2019 09:18 PM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 15895278)
What is the proper grease? Do you have a link to it?

I don't know what it's called. You just order the "super sticky clutch grease" from Roger and he sends the correct Porsche tube of goo.

Edit: Here you go.


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1542ce57e7.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5f15a5444d.jpg

BC 06-08-2019 11:51 PM

When I had the 79 it did weird things when the fuel pump intake was collapsed and the intake pump died.

Petza914 06-09-2019 12:30 AM


Originally Posted by BC (Post 15895508)
When I had the 79 it did weird things when the fuel pump intake was collapsed and the intake pump died.

But why would it just now with the new motor start exhibiting this behavior when it had run perfectly with the prior engine? Nothing in the fueling system is different, actually, nothing except the fuel lines. With mechanical injection, if the fuel lines are larger, is it possible the injectors are seeing different pressure pulses from the fuel distributor?

If there's any possibility of that, I'm thinking about reinstalling the original hard metal lines. The injectors are all brand new.

Petza914 06-09-2019 12:37 AM

I also figured out why my Knock-Link sensor wasn't initializing.

As you'll recall, I installed this while the battery was disconnected for the rest of the engine work and installed the light in the rear wiper position of the dash pod, so couldn't test the wires for switched 12v.

Well, I had two problems
  1. I wasn't getting any voltage on any of those wires when I tested them with my meter tonight. Looking at the fuse panel, because my car is a convertible, I had actually pulled the fuse for the rear wiper to prevent the possibility of a short in the wiring since it wasn't connected to anything.
  2. I had guessed at the wrong switched 12v wire going to the wiper switch. I had used the green one and testing it tonight, the 12v switched wire is the black and purple stripe one, which is actually 2 wires into a single female connector.

Installing the fuse and connecting to that wire now has the red light, then blue flashing light, then green light coming on, though I haven't started the car yet, just tested the initialization sequence.

Petza914 06-09-2019 10:42 PM

Today's update

Peter DeJong of Twin Turbo 928 fame graciously came to the house today with his CIS gauge set and knowledge of the K-Jet system from working on other comparably equipped 928s to try and help me resolve my running issues. From what we could tell, all the electrical plugs, fuel lines, and vacuum lines are connected correctly.

I learned a good bit about how the CIS system works, actually learned to use my CIS gauge set that I bought a while back, and we discovered something that we think may be the culprit with the running issues, so I thought I'd share that here for additional input from the group.

Testing the fuel pressure from the pump with the engine off and the fuel pump jumpered, we're seeing 145 psi of fuel pressure on the gauge. We thought this reading was a bit high, so disconnected his gauge set and connected mine, and got the same reading, so a lack of fuel pressure to the WUR doesn't seem to be the issue. I don't know if Carl bumped up the fuel pressure at the fuel distributor because of the supercharger, but will be talking with him tomorrow about this.

With the supercharger out of the equation (air feed disconnected from the K-Jet metering plate), if we set the mixture in the 12 - 12.5 AFR range and the idle around 85-950 rpm when the engine is idling, we would get a repeatable fluctuation where the car would idle well, then stumble as the AFR got rich, like around 10, then recover and go back to 12.5 for a few seconds, then stumble again at 10, and so on. It would stay running like this for almost as long as we wanted it to.

So we hooked up the gauge set to monitor the return pressure from the WUR. When the car was idling well at around a 12.5 AFR, the pressure on the gauge was around 130 psi, then it would start falling and when the engine started stumbling (and the AFR would drop to 10), pressure was only around 48 psi. It would keep repeating this cycle as you can see in this short video I shot.


I reconnected the supercharger and the car exhibited the exact same behavior. If I hold the revs at 2,000, the AFR would get lean, like to around 14, and if I moved up to 3,000 the AFR would go full lean to 18. If I played with the mixture screw to where at 2,000 and 3,000 RPM I had good AFR #s at around 12.5, then at idle the AFR # would be around 10 and I could visibly see both the exhaust coming out and a stream of smoke coming from my crankcase ventilation setup under the car. But with this setting on the mixture screw, the idle at 10 would hold steady and not do the fluctuation dance shown in the video. So I decided to try and drive the car this way to see what would happen.

It runs and would stay running at idle just like it did in the garage, but if I'd try to accelerate hard, it would go full lean still on the AFR gauge to 18 and start missing. I could never get the boost needle to go above zero before it would get fully lean.

I know the AFR idle setting of 10 is way too rich, but based on the above tests and results, what do you guys think the problem is. Did my WUR somehow go bad and it's not metering the fuel to the motor correctly or is there something else I should be looking at.


2 other things, testing the vacuum advance and retard of the new distributor, neither would work. Peter discovered that the arm that goes on the pin and pulls the distributor was disconnected. He fixed it once but I came off again in the next round of testing so I took it apart and discovered the arm was actually a little bent, which is what was allowing it to come off the pin. I straightened the arm and reconnected it onto the pin and using a Mighty-vac tester, was able to both advance and retard the timing depending on which port I was connected to, so that problem now seems to be fixed.

Also, the clutch action is very good - smooth and the new friction discs don't grab and shudder like the prior Spec units even when trying to start of on an incline, so looks like I have that problem rectified too, which will make driving the car much more enjoyable, providing I can get the motor running right. Still hoping to get the car ready to make the Rendezvous event in Atlanta in a few weeks.

Thanks for any guidance or suggestions.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-10-2019 10:20 AM

Hi Pete,
It sounds like fuel pressure is not being regulated properly. Does K-jet have a separate fuel pressure regulator or is it part of the fuel distributor?
Glad you fixed the distributor. I was lucky. When I tested mine with the Mityvac, it worked right away.
Sounds like you're making progress.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 06-10-2019 10:27 AM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15897758)
Hi Pete,
It sounds like fuel pressure is not being regulated properly. Does K-jet have a separate fuel pressure regulator or is it part of the fuel distributor?
Glad you fixed the distributor. I was lucky. When I tested mine with the Mityvac, it worked right away.
Sounds like you're making progress.
Good luck,
Dave

To my knowledge, fuel pressure is controlled by the spring in the fuel distributor and there is not a separate pressure regulator. The WUR sees full pressure from the fuel distribututor, then modulates that pressure based on temperature back to the fuel distributor for what then gets sent to the individual injectors. I might need to do another pressure test at the input of the WUR with the car running (instead of just the pump running) to see if the pressure coming in is fluctuating or if it's just the pressure going out that's fluctuating. That may pinpoint my issue to either the Fuel Distributor or the WUR. But I still don't understand why either of these is having a problem that wasn't there before the engine swap.

Carl Fausett 06-10-2019 11:52 AM

Hmmm... its a bid of a head-scratcher to be sure, but we're missing something. I'm wondering about the air flow meter - in "the shoe" as we like to call it. That disc rises and falls according to a taper machined into the walls of the shoe. Would you check the taper in the 4.5L air flow meter with that of the 4.7L air flow mater? Push the air flow meter disc down with your fingers and photograph the wall of the meter on both and please post them.

Because the 300 HP motor had larger valves, larger runners, and higher lift cams - I would think the increase in air flow would require a different air flow meter calibration. Meaning: taper and shape of the housing. Specifically near the top, where it effects idle and tip-in. I have also published before that I thought the fuel distributor for the 300 HP K-Jet was different than the 220 HP model. I have been told I was wrong on this a number of times, but still, I have been unconvinced.

Back in the day :) the hot setup on your VW Rabbit with CIS was to install a build-up of tape on the inside rim of the air flow meter to narrow the bore of it at the top, above the plate. This narrowed the opening, making the velocity of the air passing through the meter faster and as a result, drawing the plate down deeper, enriching the fuel mixture. Analog stuff. Memories.

Carl Fausett 06-10-2019 11:55 AM

...about my last post... I am reminded that many guys (including myself) have swapped the M28/11 cams, intake, and heads on to their M28/01 motor with no trouble or tuning issues at all. So I might be wrong to send you down the road to obscure stuff when it is more likely something simple we have overlooked.

Have you tried adjusting the control pressure via the screw I placed in the bottom of your WUR?

Petza914 06-10-2019 12:35 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15897990)
...about my last post... I am reminded that many guys (including myself) have swapped the M28/11 cams, intake, and heads on to their M28/01 motor with no trouble or tuning issues at all. So I might be wrong to send you down the road to obscure stuff when it is more likely something simple we have overlooked.

Have you tried adjusting the control pressure via the screw I placed in the bottom of your WUR?

I have not and did not know my specific WUR you installed had an adjustment screw on the bottom. This is exactly the type of tip I was looking for.

As a reminder (in response to your prior post), I have the base 4.7L engine onto which I installed my complete K-Jet fueling setup from my 4.5L as well as the cams from the 4.5L into the cam towers from the 4.7L.

I don't have the L-Jet fueling setup from the 4.7L motor where I can compare the shoes. The 4.7L is not a not a Euro, just the US version with higher compression.

I reused my WUR, my fuel distributor, but installed brand new Bosch injectors and new stainless fuel lines. The lines from the WUR to the Distributor are Greg Brown versions. The lines from the fuel distributor to the injectors are not his.

So, going back to the fuel pressure at the WUR. The inlet pressure with the engine off and the fuel pump jumpered is 145 psi. I did not do a test where I monitored this pressure with the engine running. The outlet pressure with the mixture screw set so that AFR at idle is around 12-12.5 is what you see on the gauge in the video. With an inlet pressure of 145 psi, how should I adjust the pressure screw you referenced in the bottom of the WUR? Can the WUR be unbolted from the mount and adjusted while the engine is running or does it have to be removed, adjusted, and reinstalled to be tested?

Here is a photo from inside the shoe. If you can't enlarge it far enough via Rennlist, let me know and I'll email it to you.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2da5519cea.jpg


Let me know what other tests I should perform. Thanks.

Carl Fausett 06-10-2019 01:04 PM

Don't do anything rash just yet... I am not sure you DO have an adjustable WUR. I am looking through your old invoices to see if you ever bought one. If you do look, the bottom of it will look like this:

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...db5a88e2f8.jpg

Petza914 06-10-2019 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15898169)
Don't do anything rash just yet... I am not sure you DO have an adjustable WUR. I am looking through your old invoices to see if you ever bought one. If you do look, the bottom of it will look like this:

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...db5a88e2f8.jpg


My Build Parts Invoice shows a "Used 086 Warm up Regulator" and I remember you telling me we installed the one that had altitude compensation, which I assume is the purpose of the 2nd vacuum line port that some others don't have. Would this mean you also modified the bottom to make it adjustable?

Carl Fausett 06-10-2019 01:17 PM

I can't find an invoice where I charged you for modifying your WUR, so I may have sold you the one off my K-Jet race car that already had been modified. If you can slide a small mirror under the WUR you may be able to see without removing it.

Petza914 06-10-2019 01:25 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15898208)
I can't find an invoice where I charged you for modifying your WUR, so I may have sold you the one off my K-Jet race car that already had been modified. If you can slide a small mirror under the WUR you may be able to see without removing it.

Does it just remove by taking out the 2 side bolts? Mine has flex lines on it now so I should be able to get a look at the bottom if removal is that simple.

Carl Fausett 06-10-2019 01:37 PM

Yep. Two bolts, that's it.

Petza914 06-10-2019 03:06 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15898258)
Yep. Two bolts, that's it.

Carl, here's the info you had sent me about the WUR that's in the car:

I replaced your WUR with a "086" model I had here. The WUR's that end in "086" are altitude compensating, and they have a greater range of control pressures. This makes them ideal for getting max fuel when under boost. They are just real hard to find - only installed on cars that were shipped to Northern Italy and Austria, etc.

You think this one has the adjustment screw?

In this same exchange, you mentioned you had been fighting a lean condition and found that to be a vacuum line routing issue. By chance do you have the vacuum line diagram that shows how things should be connected to the available ports? I took a lot of photos when I was taking thing apart and am pretty sure they're correct - also checked when Peter was here yesterday, but if you remember which one or two were the the problem, maybe I've made the same mistake.

I'll try to look tonight to see if the WUR has the adjustment screw on the bottom as well.

If so, back to the original question on pressure - what should the pressure be when the car is fully warmed up and how do I adjust the adjustable WUR to change the fuel pressure? Looking at the bottom of the WUR with the adjustment screw, does turning it clockwise increase or decrease the pressure?


Petza914 06-11-2019 12:33 AM

Had what I think may be a Eureka discovery this evening.

Earlier today I was reading some CIS information that had been shared with me by Ron Borras and one of the articles was "Playing with your K-Jetronic Warm Up Regulator, or WUR". In this article, the author (who isn't listed) states that "if your control pressure is high, you need to find out if if is due to incorrect calibration of the regulator, or a blockage in the system somewhere".

Well, based on the manual, my control pressure was way high - 145 psi vs the around 90 it should be at the top of the range, so it got me thinking about blockages in the fueling system. Though I had installed a couple of Greg Brown's fuel lines, I actually don't think I was able to install the right lines in the right places and a couple of those lines had little adapters with small holes in them, and though I'm sure they were fine (since all of Greg's stuff if first rate), I decided it was time to start eliminating variables, compared to how the car used to run. Before the engine swap, it would start immediately and run perfectly with a rock solid idle, great responsiveness, good AFR numbers, etc. The fuel distributor and/or the WUR don't just go bad when being removed from one motor and installed on another, so I decided to go back to the original hard fuel lines. I was initially just going to run the 2 from the Fuel Distributor to the WUR, but decided that still leaves too many variables, so bit the bullet and started taking stuff apart again, including removal of all the fuel lines.

The stainless injector lines I had installed had different end connectors for the injector side than the OEM hard lines, and I figured because of that, is why each one had a small o-ring inside. Here's a picture of the #4 line I didn't use in its original form because it sticks up off the injector and interferes with the heat exchanger for the supercharger, so for #4 I had reused my OEM hard line. (Note: Greg's version of these stainless lines have 90 degree ends, probably have the stainless sections coatedlike his others to not abrade themselves or other things they contact, and I would guess the ends can be tightened independently of the line rotating also like his others, all of which would make his much nicer than these).

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6b24875731.jpg


Well I took the first couple lines off the injectors and saw this squiggly black stuff drop down onto my pristine cam towers, so the next few I was more careful about as I took them apart...

Here's the Eureka moment


https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3630212dd2.jpg

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8cab84de6d.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38bb5e9d1a.jpg


I don't know what those o-rings were made of, but they certainly weren't fuel resistant, and essentially disintegrated and exploded in the injector inlet. In fact looking at the taper inside the fuel hose, and how that would mate with the injector, they probably didn't need to be in there at all, but each line had one.

So the blockages they surely caused is why I think whenever I'd try to give the motor some fuel, the AFR gauge would go super lean and why when using the mixture screw to try and enrich it would be able to do that at idle when the demand for fuel volume was very low, but not under any load since I'm sure I had a very compromised flow through the injectors. The sad part is that these were brand new injectors and the way the o-rings disintegrated into tiny pieces, I'm sure they are now completely full of rubber debris and ruined so I'm going to have to throw them out.

Tonight I moved the new tension rings and sealing washers from the new injectors over to the old injectors that I had removed when the 4.5L was running perfectly, and have now reinstalled them. I was going to reinstall the hard fuel lines, but they look crappy compared to the rest of the engine, so I decided to mask off the ends and use some high temp engine paint to freshen up the outside of them.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...88a0ac0f13.jpg

I'll reinstall them on Wednesday when I return from a business trip and see where things stand.

My theory is the super high fuel pressure was being caused by the fuel distributor not being able to push any fuel through the injectors which then backed up through the WUR outlet line and effected the WUR inlet line pressure as well. The surging witnessed in the video was because once the pressure built up high enough, it was able to push some fuel through the clogged injectors, but once the pressure subsided a bit, the car got no fuel and wanted to die, but just before it would, the pressure got high enough again to force more fuel in.

When I tried to drive it around the neighborhood yesterday, any time I would give it any gas it would go full lean - of course it would without any fuel getting through the injectors...

I'm glad I didn't make a bunch of changes to the fuel distributor or the WUR as my gut feeling is that this was the primary running issue and once the correct fuel lines are reinstalled, it will just be a matter of tuning with the mixture screw, idle screw, and timing and then I'll be back in business.

Fingers crossed....

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-11-2019 08:26 AM

Good job, Pete. That sure looks promising.
Good luck,
Dave

Chris Lockhart 06-11-2019 10:10 AM

Wow! Those O-rings have seriously turned to sh*t! Glad you found it Pete.

Carl Fausett 06-11-2019 10:54 AM

I agree with your logic, Pete. That would explain the unusually high pressures in the system and yet, running lean as well. I hope none of the little pieces of rubber are lodged in your injectors. Mechanical injectors cannot be back-flushed, just in case you are thinking about that. If memory serves, I think there is a micro-screen at the top of the injector to catch debris before it enters the barrel, That may save the day here.

Petza914 06-11-2019 11:04 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15900239)
I agree with your logic, Pete. That would explain the unusually high pressures in the system and yet, running lean as well. I hope none of the little pieces of rubber are lodged in your injectors. Mechanical injectors cannot be back-flushed, just in case you are thinking about that. If memory serves, I think there is a micro-screen at the top of the injector to catch debris before it enters the barrel, That may save the day here.

Someone said acetone may dissolve the rubber bits. The little filter screens are in the outlets of the FD, not the inlets of the injectors. I'm going to take them to a diesel performance shop and see what they say.

Carl Fausett 06-11-2019 11:36 AM

I think there may also be inlet screens down inside the injector. Not sure if acetone would dissolve that material, but no harm in trying. Looks like you have plenty of little chunks of it to try it on in a jar.

Petza914 06-11-2019 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15900341)
I think there may also be inlet screens down inside the injector. Not sure if acetone would dissolve that material, but no harm in trying. Looks like you have plenty of little chunks of it to try it on in a jar.

Yes, yes I do. I'll do some experimenting with stuff in the chemicals cabinet :)

For the time being, I've reset the mixture screw baseline from Jim Doerr's advice - jumpering the fuel pump, enriching the mixture until it squeaks and then backing it off again until the squeaking stops. Hoping that gets me close enough to run and I'll adjust from there.

My idle screw is probably out of whack now too. Is there a baseline setting or trick for that one as well?

Carl Fausett 06-11-2019 11:58 AM

Lightly turn the idle speed screw in till it just closes. Then back it out 2 full turns. That should provide too high of an idle speed, but it will allow you to get it going at least. Then you will adjust from there.

Petza914 06-11-2019 12:04 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15900394)
Lightly turn the idle speed screw in till it just closes. Then back it out 2 full turns. That should provide too high of an idle speed, but it will allow you to get it going at least. Then you will adjust from there.

Beautiful. Thanks.

GregBBRD 06-11-2019 10:19 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15899666)
Had what I think may be a Eureka discovery this evening.

Earlier today I was reading some CIS information that had been shared with me by Ron Borras and one of the articles was "Playing with your K-Jetronic Warm Up Regulator, or WUR". In this article, the author (who isn't listed) states that "if your control pressure is high, you need to find out if if is due to incorrect calibration of the regulator, or a blockage in the system somewhere".

Well, based on the manual, my control pressure was way high - 145 psi vs the around 90 it should be at the top of the range, so it got me thinking about blockages in the fueling system. Though I had installed a couple of Greg Brown's fuel lines, I actually don't think I was able to install the right lines in the right places and a couple of those lines had little adapters with small holes in them, and though I'm sure they were fine (since all of Greg's stuff if first rate), I decided it was time to start eliminating variables, compared to how the car used to run. Before the engine swap, it would start immediately and run perfectly with a rock solid idle, great responsiveness, good AFR numbers, etc. The fuel distributor and/or the WUR don't just go bad when being removed from one motor and installed on another, so I decided to go back to the original hard fuel lines. I was initially just going to run the 2 from the Fuel Distributor to the WUR, but decided that still leaves too many variables, so bit the bullet and started taking stuff apart again, including removal of all the fuel lines.

The stainless injector lines I had installed had different end connectors for the injector side than the OEM hard lines, and I figured because of that, is why each one had a small o-ring inside. Here's a picture of the #4 line I didn't use in its original form because it sticks up off the injector and interferes with the heat exchanger for the supercharger, so for #4 I had reused my OEM hard line. (Note: Greg's version of these stainless lines have 90 degree ends, probably have the stainless sections coatedlike his others to not abrade themselves or other things they contact, and I would guess the ends can be tightened independently of the line rotating also like his others, all of which would make his much nicer than these).

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6b24875731.jpg


Well I took the first couple lines off the injectors and saw this squiggly black stuff drop down onto my pristine cam towers, so the next few I was more careful about as I took them apart...

Here's the Eureka moment


https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3630212dd2.jpg

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8cab84de6d.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38bb5e9d1a.jpg


I don't know what those o-rings were made of, but they certainly weren't fuel resistant, and essentially disintegrated and exploded in the injector inlet. In fact looking at the taper inside the fuel hose, and how that would mate with the injector, they probably didn't need to be in there at all, but each line had one.

So the blockages they surely caused is why I think whenever I'd try to give the motor some fuel, the AFR gauge would go super lean and why when using the mixture screw to try and enrich it would be able to do that at idle when the demand for fuel volume was very low, but not under any load since I'm sure I had a very compromised flow through the injectors. The sad part is that these were brand new injectors and the way the o-rings disintegrated into tiny pieces, I'm sure they are now completely full of rubber debris and ruined so I'm going to have to throw them out.

Tonight I moved the new tension rings and sealing washers from the new injectors over to the old injectors that I had removed when the 4.5L was running perfectly, and have now reinstalled them. I was going to reinstall the hard fuel lines, but they look crappy compared to the rest of the engine, so I decided to mask off the ends and use some high temp engine paint to freshen up the outside of them.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...88a0ac0f13.jpg

I'll reinstall them on Wednesday when I return from a business trip and see where things stand.

My theory is the super high fuel pressure was being caused by the fuel distributor not being able to push any fuel through the injectors which then backed up through the WUR outlet line and effected the WUR inlet line pressure as well. The surging witnessed in the video was because once the pressure built up high enough, it was able to push some fuel through the clogged injectors, but once the pressure subsided a bit, the car got no fuel and wanted to die, but just before it would, the pressure got high enough again to force more fuel in.

When I tried to drive it around the neighborhood yesterday, any time I would give it any gas it would go full lean - of course it would without any fuel getting through the injectors...

I'm glad I didn't make a bunch of changes to the fuel distributor or the WUR as my gut feeling is that this was the primary running issue and once the correct fuel lines are reinstalled, it will just be a matter of tuning with the mixture screw, idle screw, and timing and then I'll be back in business.

Fingers crossed....

Just to be clear....none of my injector, fuel distributor, or cold start lines have any rubber inside.

Where did those lines with the rubber inside come from?

GregBBRD 06-11-2019 10:21 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15900259)
Someone said acetone may dissolve the rubber bits. The little filter screens are in the outlets of the FD, not the inlets of the injectors. I'm going to take them to a diesel performance shop and see what they say.

I think you are going to need new injectors.

Petza914 06-12-2019 12:10 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15901757)
Just to be clear....none of my injector, fuel distributor, or cold start lines have any rubber inside.

Where did those lines with the rubber inside come from?

Correct, I thought I was clear in saying the "non Greg Brown" lines. I have 3 of your lines and installed 2 of them - the ones from the WUR to the Fuel Distributor, but couldn't maje the 3rd line work, which I think was for the cold start valve - I think you were going to email me some directions (petza914@gmail.com).

The lines that run from the fuel distributor to the individual injectors that had the rubber o-rings that disintegrated were NOT your lines and were sourced from another member who was going to use them with a new fuel rail setup on an L-Jet car, but we thought they'd work for my K-Jet setup too. He had never installed them.

Your injector lines are much better for at least 3 reasons:
  1. Your braided stainless is costed so the lines don't abrade or get abraded.
  2. Your injector ends have 90 degree turns on them so they are lower profile and don't stick up like these straight versions I had installed
  3. The injector ends turn independently of the line so the banjo fitting at the fuel distributor can sit perfectly flat and the hoses can run next to each other like the factory hardlines do, and the hoses aren't under any twist load when attached at both ends.

Roger is checking current pricing for me on the set he has on-hand in case I decide to reconnect the 2 WUR to FD LINES, figure out how to install the 3rd line, and add the injector lines, but for right now I'm going to run the car with the old injectors that came out and the OEM hard lines to get it tuned and running like it was before without additional variables.

I'm going to see if someone can clean the injectors of the rubber that's in them by dissolving it by passing a chemical through it. If not, I'll just use my old injectors or purchase another set if necessary.

GregBBRD 06-12-2019 03:12 AM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15901993)
Correct, I thought I was clear in saying the "non Greg Brown" lines. I have 3 of your lines and installed 2 of them - the ones from the WUR to the Fuel Distributor, but couldn't maje the 3rd line work, which I think was for the cold start valve - I think you were going to email me some directions (petza914@gmail.com).

The lines that run from the fuel distributor to the individual injectors that had the rubber o-rings that disintegrated were NOT your lines and were sourced from another member who was going to use them with a new fuel rail setup on an L-Jet car, but we thought they'd work for my K-Jet setup too. He had never installed them.

Your injector lines are much better for at least 3 reasons:
  1. Your braided stainless is costed so the lines don't abrade or get abraded.
  2. Your injector ends have 90 degree turns on them so they are lower profile and don't stick up like these straight versions I had installed
  3. The injector ends turn independently of the line so the banjo fitting at the fuel distributor can sit perfectly flat and the hoses can run next to each other like the factory hardlines do, and the hoses aren't under any twist load when attached at both ends.

Roger is checking current pricing for me on the set he has on-hand in case I decide to reconnect the 2 WUR to FD LINES, figure out how to install the 3rd line, and add the injector lines, but for right now I'm going to run the car with the old injectors that came out and the OEM hard lines to get it tuned and running like it was before without additional variables.

I'm going to see if someone can clean the injectors of the rubber that's in them by dissolving it by passing a chemical through it. If not, I'll just use my old injectors or purchase another set if necessary.

That's a boatload of rubber...seems like way more than what would come from an O-ring.

You suppose that rubber was plugs that were there to keep the lines clean?

Petza914 06-12-2019 08:49 AM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15902198)
That's a boatload of rubber...seems like way more than what would come from an O-ring.

You suppose that rubber was plugs that were there to keep the lines clean?

Greg, I don't think so. I think the o-rings just swelled up and then shredded under the pressure and clogged everything up. If you look at the photo of the scraps on the pan, they have a curve to them, like they were circular at one point. There weren't any plugs in the end as all the lines looked like that one photo of the 1 line I didn't use - just the metal tapered end with the o-ring up against the flat cap portion outside the taper. With the end of the line being tapered and the connection at the injector having the reverse cone shape, I'm not sure why a sealing ring of any kind was in those lines. Seems like they would have sealed up fine without them just like the factory lines did/do.

At this point, those lines aren't going back on. I'll either run a set of your SS lines with the correct 90 degree ends and fittings or the OEM hard lines. I'm going to get the car running with the OEM lines first.

BC 06-12-2019 03:06 PM

They were the lines sold here: https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...iders-etc.html

Petza914 06-13-2019 12:51 AM

Reinstalled all the (freshly painted) OEM fuel lines this evening, but it was too late to start the car to see if that was the issue. Maybe tomorrow, but have a bunch of people coming to stay for the weekend starting in the morning so might not get to run it and start tuning until Sunday afternoon.

They actually make the engine bay look neater and work better with the intercooler (currently not installed but the fluid hoses are coupled so as not to make a mess) as they're lower and flatter where the intercooler sits in the back on the passenger side. May just stick with them although I left the 2 GB lines from the WUR to the FD installed as routed, just disconnected the ends, in case I want to go back to those 2.

I jimpered the fuel pump and ran it for about 1 minute to check for leaks at the injectors, FD, and WUR. Didn't see any but will check again when it's running.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0b67b3c829.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e65ee4de77.jpg

Petza914 06-16-2019 04:44 PM

Not the Father's Day I was hoping for.

Started the car today with the original injectors and OEM fuel lines installed, expecting to be able to fine tune mixture, timing, idle etc and no luck. Runs exactly like it did with the clogged up fuel line ends and injectors. I can get it to idle reasonably stable, but as soon as I give it any gas (even without any load on the motor) it goes full lean to an 18 AFR and won't rev past 2,000 rpm. If I make the mixture screw way rich to where I can keep the AFR at 13 or below at 3000 rpm, the AFR at idle is like a 10 or richer and I can see the richness coming out the exhaust.

What's weird is disconnecting any of the electrical plugs (WUR, cold start injector, air control valve) seems to have no effect on the way the engine is running so I thought maybe I had an electrical issue. I cleaned the contacts and pins in the 14 pin connector and no difference. I jumpered the fuel pump and no difference.

Tried spraying some ether around everything looking for an increase in RPMs from a vacuum leak, but didn't detect any. Replaced my braided stainless vacuum lines with tighter fitting silicone ones and no difference there either.

Getting pretty frustrated with it and about ready to cancel my Rendezvous reservations, put it up on the lift in storage for the next few months to enjoy the rest of my summer while the kids are off from school, unless someone has some additional ideas on what to try.

:banghead:

jej3 06-16-2019 08:54 PM

So sorry to hear this Pete. We spent TOO much time today trying to get the 1990 928 running so we could bring two to Rendezvous. I'd honestly suggest you trailer the car and get the experts on hand to at least help with diagnosing it. If it doesn't improve, you'll have feedback and can tackle it in the Fall.

I did a top-end refresh on my 1990 and now I have half the cylinders getting spark, etc..., etc... It is maddening but you've got a pretty unique opportunity to get several qualified eyes on your car. Just food for thought!

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-16-2019 09:33 PM

Sorry Pete.
I don't know much about K-jet injection, but it sounds like your pressure at idle was too high (rich), and at part throttle it is too low (lean). Pressure partially determines amount of fuel delivered, since the injectors flow continuously. Is it possible that some component in the pressure regulator is stuck? I don't know if that's even a reasonable question, but it sounds like something is working opposite to design, or not at all.
As I read the WSM and my Fuel Injection book by Probst, the fuel pressure regulator is a part of the fuel distributor body, and depends on a spring activated valve which returns fuel to the tank depending on pressure.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 06-17-2019 06:34 AM

I'm going to get the gauges back out and see what my inlet pressure from the distributor to the WUR and the outlet pressure from the WUR back to the fuel distributor are now that I've eliminated the line blockages from all the rubber o-ring. I'm also going to try and smoke test the intake to make sure there isn't a vacuum leak somewhere. I'll try that with just the smoke machine pressure and if it doesn't show anything, will fill all the intake plumbing with smoke and then let the supercharger force feed it to see if that makes a difference.

Petza914 06-17-2019 11:14 AM

How large a vacuum leak would I need to have it be the cause of some of the issues I'm having.

With my smoke machine...

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a6059aea32.jpg

I found 2 today...

1 was a cracked small hose on a nipple very close to the primary vacuum booster.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2d6a573a98.jpg


The second was at the mixture screw. When the supercharger is connected with all the plumbing, it's very difficult to access the mixture screw because you have to get a tool under the custom piece that is the path for the forced air into the metering plate. I removed the spring from my mixture screw or make this adjustment easier and didn't realize until this morning that the spring actually seals the opening with an o-ring at the base of the mixture post when adjustments aren't being made. I'll get an appropriate spring today to reinstall and have put on a fresh o-ring as well.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...583fba683a.jpg

Both of these seam like fairly minor leaks, though I did get pretty good smoke plumes out of them. Is any leak a major issue or does it have to be a major leak to be a major issue?


The other thought I had is whether it's possible that this engine is creating so much vacuum that it's pulling open the supercharger blow off valve and creating an intake leak at the connection nipple on the front of the spider body. This connection is where the hard line for the boost/vac gauge is connected and where the line to the blow off valve is connected. I'll block off the line to the BOV next time I run it to see if there's any difference.

Carl Fausett 06-17-2019 11:45 AM

The leak at the brake booster would be a bad one, but that weeping at the mixture screw on the CIS show is pretty insignificant. Fix it if you can, but don't worry too much about that one.

You are still trying to get it running right NA, right? Don't even bother to hook up the supercharger until it runs right non supercharged.

When you press the paddle down in the CIS air flow meter, it descends nicely with equal pressure, no sticky spots, right? Just checking that the piston in the fuekl distributor moves freely and smoothly, in case it picked up a piece of dirt during the transfer...

Petza914 06-17-2019 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15912715)
The leak at the brake booster would be a bad one, but that weeping at the mixture screw on the CIS show is pretty insignificant. Fix it if you can, but don't worry too much about that one.

You are still trying to get it running right NA, right? Don't even bother to hook up the supercharger until it runs right non supercharged.

When you press the paddle down in the CIS air flow meter, it descends nicely with equal pressure, no sticky spots, right? Just checking that the piston in the fuekl distributor moves freely and smoothly, in case it picked up a piece of dirt during the transfer...

Carl, correct - trying to get it running without any forced air at this point. I have the airbox, the outlet from the supercharger, the heat exchanger, and the custom piece that connects the heat exchanger all removed from the car and am allowing ambient air to enter the metering shoe. The metering plate moves nice and smooth with very little pressure and closes all the way on it's own. I've already fixed the booster leak and will have the mixture screw leak fixed after lunch when I can swing by the hardware store and get an appropriate spring.

I'm going to hook the gauges back up before the next cold start. Will it be more telling to see the pressure going into the WUR or out of the WUR as the car warms up?

Last time I measured pressure into the WUR, I did it with the engine off and the fuel pump jumpered. Is that the proper way or should I monitor it while the car is running to see if it fluctuates. I only have one guage set so will have to do the two tests separately, which is why I ask which is the better one to have hooked up for cold start.

Thanks.

Carl Fausett 06-17-2019 12:20 PM

Which heads are on them Motor? The used 4.7 heads, right? If there is an intake valve not sealing against its seat correctly, it can cause a reversion into the plenum that can drive a K-Jet nuts. To diagnose this, compression check the motor. Be sure to hook up a battery charger during the compression check. All cylinders should be within 10% of each other. If there is a low one or two, then switch to a cylinder leak-down test on those cylinders. Look for a possible intake valve leak.

Petza914 06-17-2019 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15912790)
Which heads are on them Motor? The used 4.7 heads, right? If there is an intake valve not sealing against its seat correctly, it can cause a reversion into the plenum that can drive a K-Jet nuts. To diagnose this, compression check the motor. Be sure to hook up a battery charger during the compression check. All cylinders should be within 10% of each other. If there is a low one or two, then switch to a cylinder leak-down test on those cylinders. Look for a possible intake valve leak.

Correct, the heads from the 4.7 with the cam towers from the 4.7, but the cams from the 4.5. Heads were rebuilt by Greg Brown (I believe) for the previous owner (Josh - ladybug83). If I was getting reversion pressure through an intake valve that wasn't closed, would I be able to detect this on the boost/vac gauge as a brief change from vac to less vac or does it happen too fast to be visible on a gauges?

Compression test - coil wire disconnected, fuel pump relay out, correct? Throttle plate open or closed?

Carl Fausett 06-17-2019 02:47 PM

Throttle open. As to the vaccum gauge, an intake vale that is not seating would make the needle jump. It can be very fast.

Petza914 06-17-2019 04:26 PM

Rebuilt the mixture screw with a new spring, new o-rings and uses some sealant on the old gasket when reinstalling.

Both vacuum leaks now repaired and I redid the smoke test. Now, no smoke being emitted from anywhere with the throttle plate open or closed.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...3cafadfedd.jpg


Need to know which side of the WUR to monitor for tonight's cold start running test.

Petza914 06-17-2019 07:45 PM

Nothing seems to make a difference.

Here's the car running after cold start. You can see as the motor warms up, the fuel pressure starts decreasing, which I think is what it's supposed to do with the WUR, but why is the pressure so high to start with - it's pinning the gauge beyond 145 psi and why does it then spike and fall and spike and fall?


Here's 2 more - one monitoring the same line at the WUR after its warmed up and the other monitoring the other line at the WUR




Took out the pressure valve from the FD. Looks pristine.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6e9ad4c1a7.jpg

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ee5aaf4647.jpg

Took out the WUR while I was disconnecting fuel lines too. Looks like it does not have an adjustment screw unless it's under that cap on the bottom.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...af19cf99b8.jpg

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f21d56dcd0.jpg



Do I need a new Fuel Distributor, a Fuel Pressure Regulator, a WUR, etc?

Ladybug83 06-17-2019 09:22 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914
Correct, the heads from the 4.7 with the cam towers from the 4.7, but the cams from the 4.5. Heads were rebuilt by Greg Brown (I believe) for the previous owner (Josh - ladybug83). If I was getting reversion pressure through an intake valve that wasn't closed, would I be able to detect this on the boost/vac gauge as a brief change from vac to less vac or does it happen too fast to be visible on a gauges?

Compression test - coil wire disconnected, fuel pump relay out, correct? Throttle plate open or closed?

Hi Pete,
I'm just now realizing (after reading backwards through your thread) that this is the motor from the ladybug car.

The heads were rebuilt by Engine Supply in Costa Mesa, Ca.

There may be compression numbers posted in the Ladybug thread prior to me parting out the car and selling the engine, or maybe in the engine/trans for sale thread, but I don't know how relevant they are now. Probably best to re-check I suppose. I guess sitting for a few years, valves could've gotten sticky (assuming here that brenden didn't run the motor while he owned it).

I'm hoping that's a good motor for you , I put about 1,100 good miles on it prior to removal. There was coolant seeping at the water bridge when I first rebuilt it, but I believe I removed and resealed it with driebond. Also a couple time-serts where things got sideways on me, one of the water bridge bolts, and one of the alternator bolts.

Ladybug83 06-17-2019 09:36 PM

Also, not sure if this is helpful but, I think the distributor on that motor ('83) only had one vacuum line, if the distributor your using has two vacuum ports, could that be related to the issue your experiencing?

Ladybug83 06-17-2019 09:41 PM

Here ya go for compression numbers

https://rennlist.com/forums/928-foru...19-engine.html

Petza914 06-17-2019 09:59 PM

Josh,

Thanks for the info. It will be good to compare those compression #s to new ones I take in a couple days. Brendan told me about the welded head and the time-sert repairs so no surprises there and the motor was really clean with every fastener marked with red pen to know it was torqued properly. You did nice work on it during your build.

I redid the oil pump, oil pan, cam towers, cam gears, tensioner, water bridge, etc (well, you've seen the thread) The only place I have a leak is at the oil pan drain plug and everything else is perfectly dry. The drain plug one will be rectified at the first oil change which won't be long after I get it running as I have Break In oil in it currently to help dissolve the assembly lube I used..

Brendan had also linked me to that thread with the videos of the engine running, so I actually have high-confidence that the engine is good and I just need to figure out what's going on with the fueling, which worked perfectly on my 4.5L and should do the same on your old motor, but for some reason isn't. My 4.5L had a single vacuum distributor too but that's not the issue as the retard port is common to both (on the top side when there's only 1 port and on the back side when there are 2) and I can make the timing advance or retard by applying vacuum to the appropriate port. I've also run it with only the retard line connected and the advance line blocked off and no difference other than that the timing changes as you'd expect.

BC 06-17-2019 10:12 PM

I have always disliked CIS. That does not matter to this thread as much as the thought that really, there are several things that need to happy for the motor to get enough fuel at the right time, but it would seem that something is modifying the fuel rate independent of another set of parameters that are happening without a loop back to the fuel rate.

BC 06-17-2019 10:15 PM

Isn't this replacing parts time? You have replaced everything else. What about replacing whatever WUR is in there. I know Mark has some. The 79 I gave him had a good one on there. Isn't the WUR like the brain of the whole thing?

I hate CIS. Give me a cheap ECU any day.

BC 06-17-2019 10:16 PM

I am concerned about all that fuel washing down the cylinder walls.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-17-2019 10:47 PM

Hi Pete,
There are some real K-jet experts here, and I am the opposite. Please listen to them, as I know you will. I would need to have confidence in the basics of hooking up the gauge set, then knowing what the pressure readings indicate. I am not certain exactly what pressure you are reading; control pressure or system pressure. People who tune these systems all the time could probably narrow down your search. I agree that your problem is probably somewhere in the fueling system, and although it ran fine before, something has knocked it off its game. I wonder if there are rubber fragments anywhere else?
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 06-17-2019 11:12 PM

The videos I posted earlier are reading pressures in one on the input supply line and in the other the return line. The one on the output of the WUR shows the pressure gradually decreasing as the temperature increases so that kind of seems to be working.

If I have to replace the WUR, I may go with one of the electronically mappable ones, like that from Unwired Tools.

Seems like the FD might be the problem though.

I don't think there's much of a fuel wash problem since the engine is going lean most of the time and not rich, no?

I'm now wondering if I somehow I mislabeled the 4 virtually identical electrical plugs - WUR, air control valve, cold start injector, and what looks like a coolant temp sensor since unplugging them doesn't seem to have much of an effect.

Can anyone confirm which goes where.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...dbc29afab9.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...083874ed38.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...add91e2a9a.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4e041c394a.jpg
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9ebcd9f72d.jpg

Petza914 06-18-2019 08:56 AM

Could someone explain to me how the air metering plate and fuel distributor work together to control the amount of fuel being sent to the injectors relative to the amount of air coming in through the plate.

Is it difficult to rebuild a fuel distributor properly and what kits have people had success with?

Anyone have a New or Remanufactured fuel distributor they want to sell that they won't need any longer but haven't gotten around to selling yet?

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-18-2019 09:25 AM

Hi Pete,
Get the Bosch fuel injection book by C. Probst. The mechanism is ingenious.
Good luck,
Dave

dr bob 06-18-2019 09:56 AM

Pete --

(edit: I was typing at the same time Dave was.)

The pancake plate moves based on air flowing through to the engine intake. The lever that the plate connects to has an adjustment screw that changes the relationship between the plate and lever slightly. This is the idle mixture screw. Know that it makes a measurable difference at idle and low speeds, but has virtually no effect on mixture past about 25% load (horsepower) on the engine.

Control pressure, managed by the WUR, is king of mixture control under load.

There are (were) little brass screens in the ports to limit the size of crud that might move around the system. Absent fuel and in the presence of air, the brass deteriorates. That's main reason we hear that CIS cars need to be driven regularly. Folks are about the habit of taking those screens out when they start corroding to the point of restricting fuel flow. They really need to be in there. I used to keep a supply of spares when I had CIS cars, but three moves and thirty years since, the parts are long gone.

Carl may have guidance to share on a proper WUR for the supercharged car. There are certain WUR versions specified for "high altitude" service, where atmospheric pressure is used to actively bias the control pressure up when it detects low ambient pressure (higher altitude). That effectively leans out the mixture to compensate for the less dense air coming in. The metering unit is, after all, volumetric rather than mass flow sensing.

Rebuilding the fuel metering unit ("distributor") isn't difficult, but like many things it needs some serious care. The springs and pistons are carefully matched, so they need to be carefully captured and their original positions in the body preserved.

The head is sealed to the body with a gasket that was originally installed with no sealant. I used to test the head for flat with a sheet of 800 wet-or-dry floating in oil in a granite surface plate. Many used a piece of glass for this. Installing the head is an exercise in progressive torque tightening of the screws, so the head stays flat as the screws are tightened. Like a cylinder head but minus the soft gasket. If the head or body sealing surface is damaged at all (prying the head off with a screwdriver is enough), it needs to be repaired flat again. Some use Indian Head Shellac gasket sealer to manage fuel seepage when the parts or technique are less than perfect.

There are certainly some YouTube videos showing a lot of this. There are also some very good books that teach the theory of operation plus some service and component building techniques. I think the go-to is the Randy Probst book if you can find one.

The WUR is somewhat specific to the application. It modulates control pressure based on coolant temperature, plus it has an electric heating element that leans out the mixture as the engine is warming up. The temperature vs pressure curve is important. You can build a test fixture to verify this function, and there are MINOR but DANGEROUS adjustments you can make to the bimetallic strip and spring that actually manage the pressure. Sounds like you have the gauges already, so you are well on your way. The pressure/temperature curves in the WSM are good. Dinking with the WUR thermo spring is not recommended for amateurs, as very tiny changes have a big effect on pressure and mixture.

dr bob 06-18-2019 10:03 AM

And... Wire conductor colors and your WSM wiring diagrams will help you determine which connector goes to which switch or sensor.

Petza914 06-18-2019 10:17 AM

Thanks dr bob.

So, do we think my high pressure and rhythmic mixture and running fluctuations or issues are being caused by a bad WUR, a bad FD, or both? I was trying to understand how the system works in theory to try and determine what to buy to try next as I'm about out of ideas.

Even if the pressure coming into the WUR were high, as long as I could knock it down to the right range, the engine then wouldn't care, right? This makes me think that the WUR is the place to start.

I have the filter screens in my FD and during the last fuel line change removed them and cleaned them out. They weren't gunked up and you can see from the picture of the FD pressure screw that it doesn't look like there's much junk in there. That screw came out spotless and the photo I posted is how it looked upon removal - I didn't wipe it or spray it with anything to make it look like that.

Carl Fausett 06-18-2019 10:39 AM

I'm still stuck on how a running engine with a known good WUR and FD, those parts removed and then put back on, that they would suddenly become defective. Not impossible, true, but improbable.

About your connectors, the Aux air valve and the WUR get 12v power all the time, the connector has one Pos and on Neg. If you had inadvertently connected one of these to the cold start injector, you'd be firing the cold start injector constantly and the result would be a constant rich condition. The 4th AMP connector is a water temp sensor. I dont think this is the issue, but you could start the motor and while its running, disconnect all 4 of the connectors and see if it makes any difference in the tune.

At the FD, there is a filter screen sometimes at the OUTLET line of the FD that connects to the WUR on the other end. Make sure this is not blocked, or the line from FD to WUR kinked or plugged. That would cause your Very High system pressures.

Carl Fausett 06-18-2019 10:50 AM

For what its worth, I like K-Jetronic. Its brilliant and an absolute anvil once its set up. Just feed it fresh fuel and its happy. It Achilles heal is old gas and varnish. We topped out at 460 WHP/541 BHP on our 16v K-jet race car before we changed to race a 32v motor instead. It ran well for us, although in my video for Pikes Peak you can hear the fuel/air ratio was all wrong in the last few turns at 14,000 feet. But then, every fuel delivery system had that issue then.

Looking at the record - no other Fuel Injection system spanned as many years as K-Jet, and through many Government regs and changes. And remember that in the case of the 1989 Porsche 911 Turbo (the 930) - the car that Porsche used to get back the moniker of "worlds fastest production car" from Ferrari - they chose K-Jet. Think about that. The year was 1988/89, and Porsche certainly had access to the Bosch LH-Jetronic system, but they opted for K-Jetronic for their Ferrari beater. I like it.

Wasn't that a 930 in the movie Bad Boys II? Worlds fastest production car. A K-Jet was in that car. :)

Petza914 06-18-2019 11:18 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15915312)
I'm still stuck on how a running engine with a known good WUR and FD, those parts removed and then put back on, that they would suddenly become defective. Not impossible, true, but improbable.

About your connectors, the Aux air valve and the WUR get 12v power all the time, the connector has one Pos and on Neg. If you had inadvertently connected one of these to the cold start injector, you'd be firing the cold start injector constantly and the result would be a constant rich condition. The 4th AMP connector is a water tekp sensor. I dont think this is the issue, but you could start the motor and while its running, disconnect all 4 of the connectors and see if it makes any difference in the tune.

At the FD, there is a filter screen sometimes at the OUTLET line of the FD that connects to the WUR on the other end. Make sure this is not blocked, or the line from FD to WUR kinked or plugged. That would cause your Very High system pressures.

This is why I've been very hesitant to make any changes to either of those things and then lose the baseline of what had been working.

I think I may have had the coolant sensor and the cold start injector plugs reversed as you say. I had a texting round table last night with the Carolina 928s guys (Peter, Scott, Ron, Seth, Chris, etc) and we started looking at that. Two of those plugs have the same wire colors and I'm assuming and believe these are the 12v and ground ones you mention that go to the Air Control valve and the WUR. They are different lengths and I don't think the plug that goes to the air control valve will reach any of the other plugs. Do they get 12v with the key on or only when the engine is running and where do they get their voltage from (the 14 pin connector and that harness)?

One of the two remaining plugs has 3 wires going into the plug even though it only has two contacts and it was decided last night that this one is the one for the cold start injector. Can you confirm this is correct? The other (yellow and brown 2 wire) is for the thermo sensor and from my pictures with the colored wire ties on each plug, it looks like I may have somehow labeled / wire tied these incorrectly where I had the 3 wire plug on the thermo switch and the other on the cold start injector.

I was trying different combinations of the plugs on the devices last night and with one combination, the car would fire up then die immediately. Further inspection revealed that my fuse pump fuse was blown so one of the combinations I tried must have shorted that circuit and blew the fuse. Replacing the fuse had the car fire up quickly like it always had before, but it was totally lean and then died and I was unable to get it to restart.

So I think we may be onto something. If the cold start injector was running all the time and I was adjusting the mixture screw leaner to compensate for this extra fuel that would explain why once I moved the connectors that the car started properly but was full lean immediately.

It would also explain why the mixture screw was so out of whack that at idle it was rich, but with any pedal or load would go full lean as I don't think the surplus fuel from the cold start injector is enough to handle that much plate movement.

The last thing I did last night was to rebaseline the mixture screw going fully CCW then with the fuel pump jumpered going CW until the injectors squealed and then CCW again about a half turn. Also closed the idle screw CW all the way and then CCW 2 turns. By the time I had made all three changes I think I had flooded the motor and it was too late to run it again in the garage anyway. I'm now out of town until tomorrow evening but will get back into it then.

I will also check the screens in the FD positions for the lines that run to and from the WUR to see if that's the cause of my pressure issue. I've tried both the OEM lines from the WUR to the FD and Greg Browns lines without any difference so I'm confident it's not a line issue but could be a filter screen issue to the line.

Thanks to everyone for sticking with me through this.

Carl Fausett 06-18-2019 11:48 AM


So I think we may be onto something. If the cold start injector was running all the time and I was adjusting the mixture screw leaner to compensate for this extra fuel that would explain why once I moved the connectors that the car started properly but was full lean immediately.
Sounds like it. Using a common voltmeter, the connectors for the Aux air valve and the WUR will have 12v when the ignition is in the ON or RUN position and that power will stay on as long as the key is in that position.

The cold start injector receives its power from the starter solinoid when cranking. When you stop cranking, the power to the CS Injector is meant to be shut off. To test that you have the right connector to the cold start injector, use the voltmeter to find that it only has power during cranking. The 2-wire connector with three wires going to it sounds right, as one of the ground wires also runs to the lower water temp sensor, I believe to prevent the CS injector from firing when the motor is already warm.

Petza914 06-18-2019 12:01 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15915506)
Sounds like it. Using a common voltmeter, the connectors for the Aux air valve and the WUR will have 12v when the ignition is in the ON or RUN position and that power will stay on as long as the key is in that position.

The cold start injector receives its power from the starter solinoid when cranking. When you stop cranking, the power to the CS Injector is meant to be shut off. To test that you have the right connector to the cold start injector, use the voltmeter to find that it only has power during cranking. The 2-wire connector with three wires going to it sounds right, as one of the ground wires also runs to the lower water temp sensor, I bevel to prevent the CS injector from firing when the motor is already warm.

Does the plug for the thermo switch have 12v all the time on its opposing wire where if that was the one connected to the cold start valve would explain the theory. It would make even more sense if the 12v on that wire pulsed about every 5 seconds or so as that would also explain the rhythmic swinging of the AFR gauge between rich and lean as well.

I'll be really mad at myself if I've spent all this time chasing major mechanical issues and it turns out that I had 2 plugs reversed. :banghead:

Carl Fausett 06-18-2019 12:11 PM

Don't be too hard on your self, you have done a great job.

Petza914 06-18-2019 10:22 PM

I found a very good YouTube video that explains the theory and operation of CIS mechanical fuel injection -


So, in looking at my pressure valve in the back of the fuel distributor that controls the system pressure to the WUR and in the lower chambers of the fuel distributor and comparing that to one I see for sale on eBay, they are the same, except mine looks to have an additional beefed up spring outside the normal thin spring. Is this why my fuel pressure readings are so high or is this additional larger spring normally present and just not part of the ebay item. It almost looks like someone increased the fuel pressure from the FD to the WUR to try and compensate for an issue they may have been having with the car at some point.

Below is a picture from the eBay item that's for sale
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3FQAA...wxD/s-l500.jpg

and here are the pictures of the one I removed from my FD yesterday. One picture shows it with both springs installed and the other with only the one spring, which then makes it look like the eBay item.



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1653860502.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...90accc9ed2.jpg


That second spring is a serious one compared to the normal one and would certainly explain my super high fuel pressure if it's not supposed to be there.

Should I take this pressure adjuster screw back out and try it with the extra spring removed? My problem is that I don't know what my fuel pressure was when my 4.5L car was running well as I never needed to check it - because it had been running well. It may have been way to high all along and just never caused an issue, so I don't know why it would now. Carl says that he didn't do anything to modify the fuel pressure to the WUR as part of the supercharger installation, since everything seemed to work the way it was - he changed the WUR, but didn't do anything in the FD.

GregBBRD 06-18-2019 11:00 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15916989)
I found a very good YouTube video that explains the theory and operation of CIS mechanical fuel injection - https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=a4fJAfXYxWk


So, in looking at my pressure valve in the back of the fuel distributor that controls the system pressure to the WUR and in the lower chambers of the fuel distributor and comparing that to one I see for sale on eBay, they are the same, except mine looks to have an additional beefed up spring outside the normal thin spring. Is this why my fuel pressure readings are so high or is this additional larger spring normally present and just not part of the ebay item. It almost looks like someone increased the fuel pressure from the FD to the WUR to try and compensate for an issue they may have been having with the car at some point.

Below is a picture from the eBay item that's for sale
https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/3FQAA...wxD/s-l500.jpg

and here are the pictures of the one I removed from my FD yesterday. One picture shows it with both springs installed and the other with only the one spring, which then makes it look like the eBay item.



https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1653860502.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...90accc9ed2.jpg


That second spring is a serious one compared to the normal one and would certainly explain my super high fuel pressure if it's not supposed to be there.

Should I take this pressure adjuster screw back out and try it with the extra spring removed? My problem is that I don't know what my fuel pressure was when my 4.5L car was running well as I never needed to check it - because it had been running well. It may have been way to high all along and just never caused an issue, so I don't know why it would now. Carl says that he didn't do anything to modify the fuel pressure to the WUR as part of the supercharger installation, since everything seemed to work the way it was - he changed the WUR, but didn't do anything in the FD.

I've been trying to stay out of this entire discussion, but it might be worth mentioning that there's another piston inside the fuel distributor, which the assembly in you fingers pushes on. It's that piston which actually moves and controls the fuel pressure. If there was a little bit of moisture somewhere, when you removed the fuel distributor, that piston could be frozen in the bore.

You should probably make the effort to remove and inspect that piston.

There's a small "O-ring" on that piston that seals it against the orifice that bypasses the fuel pressure, BTW. If the "O-ring" goes bad, fuel pressure will be incorrect.

BTW...your "plunger" assembly is correct. There's not an "extra" spring there. Fuel pressure is determined by the "shim" at the base of the big spring. Those "shims" come in various thicknesses, so you can set the system pressure correctly.

Petza914 06-18-2019 11:12 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15917069)
I've been trying to stay out of this entire discussion, but it might be worth mentioning that there's another piston inside the fuel distributor, which the assembly in you fingers pushes on. It's that piston which actually moves and controls the fuel pressure. If there was a little bit of moisture somewhere, when you removed the fuel distributor, that piston could be frozen in the bore.

You should probably make the effort to remove and inspect that piston.

There's a small "O-ring" on that piston that seals it against the orifice that bypasses the fuel pressure, BTW. If the "O-ring" goes bad, fuel pressure will be incorrect.

BTW...your "plunger" assembly is correct. There's not an "extra" spring there. Fuel pressure is determined by the "shim" at the base of the big spring. Those "shims" come in various thicknesses, so you can set the system pressure correctly.

Glad to have you back in - "Every time I try to get out, they pull me back in"

Good to know that big spring slipped over the top is correct. Thanks. How do I get to that internal piston you're speaking of. Obviously I need to remove all the fuel line connections, but then how does the FD come off and how much of it needs to come apart to get to it? Any chance spraying some light penetrating oil into the hole where the pressure screw is and the injector outlets or introducing some Marvel Mystery Oil might free things up without major disassembly?

Petza914 06-19-2019 12:11 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15915345)
For what its worth, I like K-Jetronic. Its brilliant and an absolute anvil once its set up. Just feed it fresh fuel and its happy. It Achilles heal is old gas and varnish. We topped out at 460 WHP/541 BHP on our 16v K-jet race car before we changed to race a 32v motor instead. It ran well for us, although in my video for Pikes Peak you can hear the fuel/air ratio was all wrong in the last few turns at 14,000 feet. But then, every fuel delivery system had that issue then.

Looking at the record - no other Fuel Injection system spanned as many years as K-Jet, and through many Government regs and changes. And remember that in the case of the 1989 Porsche 911 Turbo (the 930) - the car that Porsche used to get back the moniker of "worlds fastest production car" from Ferrari - they chose K-Jet. Think about that. The year was 1988/89, and Porsche certainly had access to the Bosch LH-Jetronic system, but they opted for K-Jetronic for their Ferrari beater. I like it.

Wasn't that a 930 in the movie Bad Boys II? Worlds fastest production car. A K-Jet was in that car. :)

Bad Boys 1 had the black Porsche Turbo - "this is a faster f'n car" - it was a Ferrari in BB2. The Porsche Turbo was a '94 964 Turbo 3.6 - the only year of the 3.6 in the Turbo prior to the 993 generation arriving, which is when it became a Twin Turbo. I don't know what fueling system was used in that 94 964 Turbo. The last run of 964 Turbos were the limited edition Flachbau cars that had exposed lay down headlights similar to the 928 and 968 - think there were around 50 of these only. The rarest of these were the couple that had the Flachbau code based on the production date, but were built with the traditional 911 fenders and upright lights and I think there were only a couple of these.

There's your 911 trivia for tonight :)

reanimotion 06-19-2019 06:46 AM

Bosch Porsche service manual for K-Jetronic through 1979

http://www.type17.ch/downloads/Injec...p%20Manual.pdf

System pressure of 145psi is ridiculously high, it should be somewhere around 75psi, see pages 35 and 45

reanimotion 06-19-2019 06:57 AM

also

http://www.frankencis.com/portals/2/...chtech-12d.pdf

Petza914 06-19-2019 07:19 AM

reanimotion,

Thanks - great resources to have.

Carl Fausett 06-19-2019 12:15 PM

I like Greg's idea of the sticking internal valve piston. And thank you for the 911 lesson. What I know about 911's would fit in a thimble. :)

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-19-2019 12:25 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15917099)
Glad to have you back in - "Every time I try to get out, they pull me back in"

Good to know that big spring slipped over the top is correct. Thanks. How do I get to that internal piston you're speaking of. Obviously I need to remove all the fuel line connections, but then how does the FD come off and how much of it needs to come apart to get to it? Any chance spraying some light penetrating oil into the hole where the pressure screw is and the injector outlets or introducing some Marvel Mystery Oil might free things up without major disassembly?

Maybe stupid, but I wonder if you can remove that piston by applying suction with your Mityvac. MMO probably wouldn't hurt either.
Good luck,
Dave

Kevin in Atlanta 06-19-2019 01:01 PM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15918034)
Maybe stupid, but I wonder if you can remove that piston by applying suction with your Mityvac. MMO probably wouldn't hurt either.
Good luck,
Dave

I used a shop vac to retrieve the shift modulator piston once. :icon107:

Petza914 06-19-2019 01:21 PM

I bet some water or cleaning fluid got into the FD while it was off and I was cleaning things before reinstallation. I'm going to pursue this plunger inside the FD to see if I can get it lubricated and moving to get the baseline fuel pressure back into the range. Between that and the potentially switched connectors on the cold start valve and thermo switch, maybe we're closer than we think to getting this resolved.

As I go through removal and further testing of the FD, it would help me a lot if someone could look at the photo of the FD and WUR below, where I've labelled the inputs and outputs with letters and numbers (they're faint but there if you look closely) to let me know which are which for the 928 K-Jet I have, as different CIS systems I've seen seem to have them labelled differently, even on L-Jet.

FD
A - connected to WUR
B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
D - connected to WUR

WUR
1 - connected to FD
2 - connected to FD

On my car, the D line on the FD went to the 1 on the WUR and the A line on the FD went to the 2 on the WUR, so they cross over from one side to the other. Is that correct as I've seen a drawing someone did of their system that shows them not crossing sides. Is 1 or 2 on the WUR the input where the system pressure should be stable and which is the output back to the FD where the pressure should be changing based on temperature.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...27e4ba586a.jpg


Once I remove the FD so I can see what's going on, is there a good way to try and lubricate and free that pressure plunger without disassembling it, like with compressed air (which port should I blow in from) or with the Mityvac supplying vacuum as Dave suggested might work?

Thanks.

GregBBRD 06-19-2019 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 15918198)
I bet some water or cleaning fluid got into the FD while it was off and I was cleaning things before reinstallation. I'm going to pursue this plunger inside the FD to see if I can get it lubricated and moving to get the baseline fuel pressure back into the range. Between that and the potentially switched connectors on the cold start valve and thermo switch, maybe we're closer than we think to getting this resolved.

As I go through removal and further testing of the FD, it would help me a lot if someone could look at the photo of the FD and WUR below, where I've labelled the inputs and outputs with letters and numbers (they're faint but there if you look closely) to let me know which are which for the 928 K-Jet I have, as different CIS systems I've seen seem to have them labelled differently, even on L-Jet.

FD
A - connected to WUR
B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
D - connected to WUR

WUR
1 - connected to FD
2 - connected to FD

On my car, the D line on the FD went to the 1 on the WUR and the A line on the FD went to the 2 on the WUR, so they cross over from one side to the other. Is that correct as I've seen a drawing someone did of their system that shows them not crossing sides. Is 1 or 2 on the WUR the input where the system pressure should be stable and which is the output back to the FD where the pressure should be changing based on temperature.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...27e4ba586a.jpg


Once I remove the FD so I can see what's going on, is there a good way to try and lubricate and free that pressure plunger without disassembling it, like with compressed air (which port should I blow in from) or with the Mityvac supplying vacuum as Dave suggested might work?

Thanks.

The internal residual fuel pressure frequently forces the piston out of the fuel distributor. The pistons sre known to come out and drop down (getting lost) while people are looking at the spring assembly. If you can't just stick in a small "stick magnet" and pull out the plunger, it's not a good thing.

Since this piston regulates incoming fuel pressure, if you remove the incoming fuel pressure line and blow with compressed air into the fuel distributor, that piston should "leave a dent", in your firewall

If the piston is stuck/frozen and will not move, that will be your system fuel pressure issue.

GregBBRD 06-19-2019 02:01 PM

There's one other thing to check. If you replaced the fuel deed and return hoses on the passenger side of the engine bay, it us possible to "swap" the two hoses, if you are not paying attention. This generally results is a very "ballooned" fuel filter, which crabs the weld and leaks fuel (from "dead headed" fuel pressure.)

However, if the filter doesn't break the weld and leak, feeding fuel pressure backwards through the system would do some really crazy things!

The quick way to check this is to simply look at the fuel filter....of it looks like a "pregnant" filter, you've swapped the two lines.

Petza914 06-19-2019 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15918292)
The internal residual fuel pressure frequently forces the piston out of the fuel distributor. The pistons sre known to come out and drop down (getting lost) while people are looking at the spring assembly. If you can't just stick in a small "stick magnet" and pull out the plunger, it's not a good thing.

Since this piston regulates incoming fuel pressure, if you remove the incoming fuel pressure line and blow with compressed air into the fuel distributor, that piston should "leave a dent", in your firewall

If the piston is stuck/frozen and will not move, that will be your system fuel pressure issue.

Good to know that is ferrous and I can retrieve it with a magnet. Considering I had the pressure spring screw out the other day and the piston didn't come out on it's own (had a rag below it to catch any fuel drips and it would have ended up in the rag), maybe it is in-fact stuck. I'll work on retrieving that tonight to see what it looks like. Anything else behind it I need to be aware of coming out with it or getting lost?

Thanks.

Petza914 06-19-2019 02:24 PM


Originally Posted by GregBBRD (Post 15918312)
There's one other thing to check. If you replaced the fuel deed and return hoses on the passenger side of the engine bay, it us possible to "swap" the two hoses, if you are not paying attention. This generally results is a very "ballooned" fuel filter, which crabs the weld and leaks fuel (from "dead headed" fuel pressure.)

However, if the filter doesn't break the weld and leak, feeding fuel pressure backwards through the system would do some really crazy things!

The quick way to check this is to simply look at the fuel filter....of it looks like a "pregnant" filter, you've swapped the two lines.

I'll check this too, but didn't replace those lines, just disconnected them and reconnected them. Before removing them, I color coded them with wire ties also - red to red and yellow to yellow, I also don't think those lines can be reversed the way they come apart as the connections aren't the same on both lines in the same orientation.

Here they are on the old motor color coded before removal.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...514b4db84f.jpg


and here's the K-Jet system after removal where you can see the end connectors being different from each other.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...39da9fcff0.jpg

Petza914 06-19-2019 06:51 PM

Took out the pressure screw out but a magnet won't retrieve anything. The mightyvac just comes out with gas in the line and won't create suction to anything.

Here's a boroscope photo of the inside of the passage. Is it in there and stuck or missing where I need to check the floor?

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6fe6245725.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e644eb1e65.jpg

Edit - looked under the lift. Nothing there. Tried to jumper the fuel pump for 1 second with rags over the open hole to see if it would shoot out, but no luck.

If it's stuck in there, which line can I disconnect and use a compressor to force it out of the hole?

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-19-2019 07:28 PM

Hi Pete,
I think that piston should move pretty easily. In fact, I'm not sure I see it in your pictures. Could it have fallen out? Probably not. Apparently that's a fine tolerance fit, and may not survive much damage from trauma or corrosion.
Maybe Greg will be able to tell from your pictures.
Good luck,
Dave

reanimotion 06-19-2019 08:22 PM


FD
A - connected to WUR
B - has red wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
C - has yellow wire tie on it - is this the input from the Fuel pump or the return from the FD back to the tank
D - connected to WUR
B is the fuel input from the tank
C is the return to the tank

to verify if the pressure regulator piston is actually in there, remove the connection at C and you should see the side of a cylinder with a groove in it

some good photos are here https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...ulator-O-rings

and a jammed one is shown here https://delorean.co.nz/mydmc/k-jetro...ooting-part-3/

Petza914 06-19-2019 08:39 PM


Originally Posted by reanimotion (Post 15919243)
B is the fuel input from the tank
C is the return to the tank

to verify if the pressure regulator piston is actually in there, remove the connection at C and you should see the side of a cylinder with a groove in it

some good photos are here https://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/s...ulator-O-rings

and a jammed one is shown here https://delorean.co.nz/mydmc/k-jetro...ooting-part-3/

Thanks and glad you've jumped in here.

Petza914 06-19-2019 11:18 PM

I do believe we've identified the excessive fuel pressure issue.

Greg Brown wins this round as I believe he was the first to mention the stuck pressures regulator plunger.

It's in there and it's still stuck even though I've removed the FD from the car, sprayed both ports that have access to it with penetrating oil and tried to pry it out using the groove that's accessible from the side port with a screwdriver, a pick, and even tried to gently wedge a tap in from the end to try and get it it to bite a little where I could turn it to free it or pull it out - none of those methods are working and it's still in there.

Upon removing the 3 screws from the top of the FD to get it off the shoe, I had to use a manual impact hammer to free one of them and when it came out, the barrel was all rusty. So was the screen on the B inlet port to the threaded fitting it sits in. Guess I got overzealous when cleaning it and introduced a bunch of water based cleaning solution into it that then rusted the iron parts.

A little penetrating oil on the bottom plunger has it working very freely, but I'm concerned with how much rust there may be inside and may not want to risk reinstalling it, even if I can get the jammed piece out. Ron Borras has a remanufactured one for his Euro he's going to let me have tomorrow and I'll replace it with a rebuilt one from Mark Anderson in a couple weeks when his comes back from the refurb shop, as this arrangement might let me still make the Rendezvous if that turns out to be my only issue. What a great community this is.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...62ab4e9821.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9c466c9a38.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e32e002ce5.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-19-2019 11:30 PM

Hi Pete,
That looks like the deal. In fairness this is what I said in Post 376: (I know I was guessing, where Greg knows what he's talking about)

"...I don't know much about K-jet injection, but it sounds like your pressure at idle was too high (rich), and at part throttle it is too low (lean). Pressure partially determines amount of fuel delivered, since the injectors flow continuously. Is it possible that some component in the pressure regulator is stuck? I don't know if that's even a reasonable question, but it sounds like something is working opposite to design, or not at all.
As I read the WSM and my Fuel Injection book by Probst, the fuel pressure regulator is a part of the fuel distributor body, and depends on a spring activated valve which returns fuel to the tank depending on pressure..."

The most important part of what I said was that I don't know much about K-jet. I was really hoping that Greg Brown would jump in and give insight. He finally did so, and it looks like he was right.
Good job,
Dave

Petza914 06-20-2019 12:32 AM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15919606)
Hi Pete,
That looks like the deal. In fairness this is what I said in Post 376: (I know I was guessing, where Greg knows what he's talking about)

"...I don't know much about K-jet injection, but it sounds like your pressure at idle was too high (rich), and at part throttle it is too low (lean). Pressure partially determines amount of fuel delivered, since the injectors flow continuously. Is it possible that some component in the pressure regulator is stuck? I don't know if that's even a reasonable question, but it sounds like something is working opposite to design, or not at all.
As I read the WSM and my Fuel Injection book by Probst, the fuel pressure regulator is a part of the fuel distributor body, and depends on a spring activated valve which returns fuel to the tank depending on pressure..."

The most important part of what I said was that I don't know much about K-jet. I was really hoping that Greg Brown would jump in and give insight. He finally did so, and it looks like he was right.
Good job,
Dave

Sorry Greg, I'm going to need that trophy back for Dave, but I do have a nice red ribbon for you.

Dave, evidently you know more than you've let on. Thanks for the help.

Pete

GregBBRD 06-20-2019 04:03 AM

Just happy to help people with these cars, when I can.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-20-2019 08:55 AM

Greg is the star. I'm just reading my books.
Dave

Carl Fausett 06-20-2019 12:31 PM

Good tip, Greg. Especially like the tip to remove the fitting from the side and see the piston directly. :thumbup:

Petza914 06-22-2019 12:29 AM

Tonight I was able to free the pressure valve from the FD by prying on the groove accessible through the side port. I guess after it sitting full of synthetic penetrating oil for 24 hours it decided to give up. With it on the end of a magnet it moves in and out smoothly, as does the bottom plunger and when the bottom plunger moves I can hear it pushing fluid or sucking.

I'm still meeting Ron in the morning to pick up his known good one off his Euro just in case when I reinstall mine, it doesn't hold the right control pressure or hold it steady. Worst (or best) case is mine works and I return Ron's to him at Rendezvous Uninstalled.

We'll know something tomorrow one way or the other. 🤞

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7dc1dbab65.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-22-2019 09:52 AM

Eureka! Fingers crossed. I've heard old gas is bad for these systems and maybe this is one example of the problems caused. You might run some Techron or something similar through.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 06-22-2019 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net (Post 15924900)
Eureka! Fingers crossed. I've heard old gas is bad for these systems and maybe this is one example of the problems caused. You might run some Techron or something similar through.
Good luck,
Dave

I run Stabil in all fill UPS of my Porsches and in the 928 about 1/3 bottle of SeaFoam in each tank to keep the FD lubricated.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-22-2019 03:01 PM

I have used both of those products, and was satisfied. I have switched to Star tron enzyme fuel treatment, and Techron. Don't know which are the better.
Good luck on your startup. I think it will run fine.
Dave

Petza914 06-23-2019 01:17 AM

Picked up the fuel distributor from Ron this morning. It had been installed in his Euro that sits outside and was a reman unit. The paint most companies use in the reman units isn't great and this one had already developed some external "patina".

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e19be6aff7.jpg

I decided not to attempt to reinstall my own as I don't have time to do these projects twice and still make Rendezvous, so I'll keep mine as a spare or send it to a rebuilder, and get Ron another reman unit if this one resolves my issues.

Since it was going into this freshly restored engine bay, it needed a clean up.

I used rubber stoppers to block all the openings, then went to it with a couple of small wire wheels - one in a drill and a really small one in a dremel to relive all the light surface rust.

https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7b5c63385c.jpg


Then I had my wife cut me some adhesive vinyl circles I could use to mask off, not only the fittings ports, but also the sealing surface where the crush washers for the banjo bolts go, as I thought uneven paint on those surfaces might prevent a proper seal.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a7d71ef516.jpg


Then I mixed up about 2 oz. of a 2-part epoxy paint I bought that should be fuel resistant and brushed on a couple light coats in one sitting. The paint has a 50 min working time and 2 hour curing time. About 4 hours later it was mostly dry but I could feel a bit of tackiness, so letting it fully cure and harden overnight.

Here's the finished product with the masking circles removed.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2802ea0abc.jpg

Tomorrow I'll install it, along with a set of Greg Brown injector fuel lines I bought from Roger and I also put in another set of new Bosch injectors as I want all this to go back together once, and to work.

Petza914 06-23-2019 02:07 PM

With K-Jet mechanical CIS does it matter to which port on the fuel distributor the injector lines get connected to? With the GB stainless lines, they fit better if #4 and #8 both go to the rear port on the FD, but I think the OEM hard fuel line setup has #8 going to the front port on that side, which makes the SS line have an odd twist.

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8350290d02.jpg


I want to move #8 to the back port and shift all the other lines forward one port which will make the driver's side match the passenger side, but not if it's going to cause me a fuel delivery or distribution issue.

On the 928ms website for Carl's adjustable fuel distributor he shows his as lines in the assembled photo going from #8 to the back port, so seems like that's OK.

https://928motorsports.com/parts/cisdistributor.php

Thanks.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-23-2019 03:18 PM

I don’t think it will matter as long as the lines are not kinked. There isn’t a rotating mechanism for distribution.
Good luck
Dave

Petza914 06-23-2019 03:53 PM

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...85e2165940.jpg


With the new fuel distributor installed - IT RUNS!

Without the supercharger installed. AFR at idle is 13.5 and without any load. Revving to 2,000, 3,000, and 4,000 RPMs it's in the 11.5-12 range which is a hair rich, but I'll see what things look like with the supercharger hooked back up and adjust the mixture screw from there, then might need to do further tweaks after doing an actual test drive with load.

While I was holding the RPMs at 4,000 my KnockLink light flashed red so I got JP to hold the revs while I checked the timing (with the vacuum lines off), and sure enough, it was almost at 40 degrees of advance BTDC. I rolled it back to 28 degrees and did the same test, and no flashing light, so it looks like maybe that sensor is going to work and provide some knock detection protection.

Bottom line is we're now making progress for the first time in a few weeks and I think the stuck pressure valve in the FD was the culprit.

Big shout out to Ron for meeting me yesterday and pulling the FD from his Euro.

As luck would have it today though, it's now pouring, so test drives will have to wait until tomorrow. I'll put the supercharger and intake back together and see where things are then.

Carl Fausett 06-23-2019 05:16 PM

I'm pulling for ya, Buddy!

Petza914 06-23-2019 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15927541)
I'm pulling for ya, Buddy!


Thanks Carl. Does it matter which FD ports the individual injector lines are connected to?

If it does can you provide the proper mapping for me. I can't find a good graphic in the PET diagram or WSM.

Injector for cylinder # to port # on the FD. Let's start with port #1 being the first one clockwise of the center port that the WUR line connects to.

Thanks.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-23-2019 05:58 PM

Good job Pete!
Dave

Carl Fausett 06-23-2019 05:58 PM

No, it does not matter. All the 8 slits within the fuel distributor match, and the piston uncovers all of them equally and at the same time. Route them so they are nice and pretty :) No harm done.

Petza914 06-23-2019 06:23 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15927606)
No, it does not matter. All the 8 slits within the fuel distributor match, and the piston uncovers all of them equally and at the same time. Route them so they are nice and pretty :) No harm done.

Excellent and thanks.

Reassembly complete, including my 928MS strut brace :)

Stationary test run also successful. Had to richwn the mixture a touch. Is between 12 and 13. 5 up to 5,000 rpm with no load. I'll see what happens tomorrow on a test drive, which I need to do anyway since the car is almost out of gas.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ddaf8ac6b1.jpg

Petza914 06-24-2019 06:13 PM

Well, it made it to and from the gas station about 5 miles away, but here's the list of issues:
  • On the way back, under boost, the clutch is slipping - RPMs rising without speed increasing, then catching and the smell of burning clutch (no tire stripes in the rear view mirror, so it wasn't the rear end breaking loose). Is it possible the stock dual plate clutch with the resurfaced friction discs can't handle the HP or Torque from this setup (probably around 400 HP & Torque) and I need to go back to the sintered spec clutch discs that came out of the car? They're so grabby, that would be a shame. Or is there an adjustment for the intermediate plate I might have incorrect where I'm not getting full friction contact from both discs to hold the power? Clutch action is perfectly smooth, no grinding of gears, so I'm getting full disengagement and I thought the intermediate plate was self adjusting once put together. I've read where the initial adjustment can be incorrect, which prevents disengagement and grinding of gears, but didn't know it could be incorrect in the other direction.
  • Cold start took a few cycles of the starter to get it to catch, but that may be from air in the cold start injector line since I just reinstalled that yesterday. Also, once it was running, it did not have the elevated idle it always used to have. Instead it stayed right at 1,000 - used to fire up and idle at around 1,600 then work it's way down.
  • AFR #s
    • At idle it's 13.5
    • Under heavy vacuum conditions it's getting semi-lean, like 14-14.5
    • Under light throttle it's right about 13
    • Under heavy acceleration with boost it was somewhere between 11.5 and 12.5 which is rich, but safe. Couldn't test that more than a couple times as the clutch would then start slipping as soon as I'd hit boost. Is that too rich where I should lean out the mixture screw a little or under full throttle does the mixture screw do very little? If I lean out the mixture screw, I'm afraid I'll be too lean at idle and under vacuum, like when coasting with the car in gear and the vacuum gauge pinned at the far left.
  • My crankcase breather setup and drain hose is producing an oil puddle under the car so oil or oil vapor is condensing and dripping out. The oil in the motor currently is pretty thin though - Driven BR40 straight weight oil that I'm using to dissolve the assembly lube I used when putting the oil pump and cams together. I'll switch to DT50 (15W/50) before the weekend.
  • Timing moved on me a couple of times. I had set it at idle in the mid-20 degree range and when I came back from the first drive, at idle, it was close to 40. Moved it back to around 30 and the next time, it was close to 20. It now seems to be holding at 25 at idle but I'll check it again after the next test drive. It's possible the vacuum advance actuator arm is sticking so it gets advanced and then stays there. Should I try and run it with just the normal retard hose hooked up and the advance hose removed? If I do that, should I cap of the advance hose to the throttle body and the port on the distributor or leave the advance port on the distributor open to atmosphere?

At higher RPMs, the car feels strong and like it's firing on all cylinders. At lower RPMs, it feels like it's missing and sluggish. Is this a timing thing or a mixture thing? At the higher RPMs the mixture is richer so should I try to richen the mixture screw a little or will that make me too rich under light throttle conditions where I'm currently around 13? Spark plugs were all new NGK BR8ES and gapped at .028. It's possible they could have gotten fouled over the past few weeks with the richness at idle that the fuel pressure issue was causing, but that seems unlikely and I think they would have cleaned up on the test drive.

On the positive side,
Oil pressure is strong at 5. Cooling system is working great with the needle in the middle of the gauge when driving. Electric fans are kicking on just before the last white line and cooling things back off. Idle seems to be stable. When hot started, it fires immediately.

Any thoughts or assistance on the tuning part would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

Carl Fausett 06-24-2019 07:24 PM

Pete,

Drive down with your son in your Cayenne. The Spyder is showing too many teething issues with the new heads/cams/etc. It might make the trip, but I also don't like the thought of your Spyder and your son on the side of the Interstate somewhere. Let's get this sorted before we push for The Long Drive. That's just my opinion.

As to clutch - please see our dyno chart below of your car that was taken right after your Stage 2 kit was installed on your 4.5L motor. Note the peak torque rpm - is that about where your clutch is breaking free? Now that you have the 4.7 heads and valves, plus intake and throttle body, we would expect the output is even higher.

Remember: clutches hold torque, not horsepower. The dyno below says that you were making 362 ft lbs of torque at the motor at that time. It's easy to believe you are at 400 ft. lbs of torque or more now. I would expect that Yes, you will have to put the clutch disks I gave you back in to hold it. Sorry buddy. Its inescapable - you make mods for more HP and Torque... you have to upgrade the clutch to match... its just the way it is. :) You lucky devil!

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f05d38a619.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-24-2019 07:35 PM

Hi Pete,
That sounds decent. The clutch doesn't sound so good. Not sure if new, but maybe (doubtful) adjustable. You may need better friction material for all that power?
It doesn't sound like you have your timing quite right. Try using your timing light and run the throttle to different speeds to see if the vacuum advance/retard functions are working. There is a WSM section on setting up the 1982 distributor timing. I have forgotten the details right now. Make sure you have that check valve T'd into the retard line so you can't blow into it from the open end. I would not run with the advance port disconnected or open to air. You might want to re-read my PM's about how that is supposed to work, but it assumes the distributor is fully functional.
Best of luck. You have knocked down a whole lot of barriers, and only have a couple left.
I know you will succeed!
Dave

Petza914 06-24-2019 08:14 PM

Carl,

It's only Monday - can't throw in the towel on a Friday trip just yet...

New update. I replaced the spark plugs figuring that all that rich and lean fluctuating with the fuel distributor problem may have messed up the set that was in there. I installed a set of Bosch Super copper

Here are photos of the plugs I pulled. 6 of the 8 have very clean tips. The other 2 are dark. Are the 2 that are dark probably fouled and not firing which is why the engine didn't feel right?

All 8
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...abad434a0f.jpg

5-8
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d787f45c40.jpg

1-4
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...e69b369777.jpg


Are the other 6 too bright and clean and what does that tell us, or do those 6 look OK?

I enriched the mixture screw about 1/8 turn. The test drive with the new plugs and new mixture setting was better. Engine idle was nice and stable AFR under coasting vacuum was 12.8 or so and was around 12.5 most of the rest of the time. I tried another full throttle and was 11 something at 2 lbs of boost before the clutch slipped again.

Timing at 3,000 rpm and 4,000 RPM with both vacuum lines attached is right at 28 BTDC.

Seems like I'm pretty close, other than the clutch, which I am going to swap back out tonight so I don't burn up the flywheel.

Petza914 06-24-2019 08:30 PM

Oil from the crankcase ventilation setup. What's causing this?

Braided stainless line is the crankcase vent line tied into the Bank 2 cam tower like it was before.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...248686e135.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...16ef9bbfd3.jpg

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...43ee17a53c.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 06-24-2019 08:40 PM

Maybe you need a catch can? Some can drain back into the block.
Good luck,
Dave

Petza914 06-24-2019 11:09 PM

Clutch pics. What do you see?

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7df312b391.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9da355ec16.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...4e45ca1839.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0d0427f6c3.jpg
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fda5d436a3.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b6b33e8943.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0b304d0a00.jpg

Petza914 06-25-2019 01:30 AM

Looking at the clutch discs again I see the problem. There are grease spray lines that go out from the hub to the shiny surfaces on the friction discs.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...945f7aa6a4.jpg


I thought the splined shaft was supposed to be lubricated with the super sticky clutch grease. Did I use too much?

I've just finished putting the clutch back together with the other friction discs and the same lubricated splined shaft and am now concerned the same thing is going to happen, or maybe a little grease on those super grabby sintered metal friction discs is just what I need for a smoother engagement :)

Should I try it like this or take it apart again before driving it and messing up these other friction discs? Will the grease eventually wear or burn off the sintered metal discs instead of being absorbed into the OEM friction material? Are those grabby enough to compensate for a little grease on them?

Chris Lockhart 06-25-2019 07:26 AM

Pete is that the original pressure plate or a new one? That thing looks like it's got hot spots from hell. I'd say you have a combination of the spline grease getting on the friction discs and a burnt PP.

928 GT R 06-25-2019 08:01 AM

Judging from the heat/wear on several of these metal inserts that there is some defect in the clutch plates themselves?

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ae890ef4c2.png

It looks like the metal spot in the disc was in contact with the flywheel and caused hot spots and some metal transfer...

Where are those clutch discs from and do you have the old ones or a new set?

Petza914 06-25-2019 08:55 AM


Originally Posted by 928 GT R (Post 15931123)
Judging from the heat/wear on several of these metal inserts that there is some defect in the clutch plates themselves?

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...ae890ef4c2.png

It looks like the metal spot in the disc was in contact with the flywheel and caused hot spots and some metal transfer...

Where are those clutch discs from and do you have the old ones or a new set?

I got them from 928 Int'l and they were brand new when I put this motor in. I reused my flywheel, intermediate plate, and pressure plate since they were new when Carl did my engine build about 20,000 miles ago.

I have the sintered metal spec discs that came out and put those back in last night. They're super aggressive and will likely address any surface irregularities you see on the mating surfaces after the first couple engagements.

Here are pictures of the spec discs that went back in last night and pictures of what the other parts looked like dirty the first time I took them out a couple months, and 2 short test drives ago (15 miles). Hopefully these other friction discs didn't permanently damage the other parts. There's plenty of meat left on these spec discs and they're super grippy and tough.

https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d8dfb69302.jpg
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...56a3cb91fc.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...9538c996e4.jpg


https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0a1c2f808a.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5da6ee9b52.jpg
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...fd25fb412d.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...430629078b.jpg

My biggest concern right now is the grease. I used the proper "super sticky grease" from Roger. When I initially put the clutch back together I had used a Teflon dry lube instead. It lasted exactly 2 moves in the driveway before the clutch started hanging up so I took it apart and used the proper stuff.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a8cf7d8e59.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38e961daa8.jpg


This is what slung onto the friction material and I'm sure caused the slipping. Maybe I was right on the edge of those discs being able to hold the torque and with a little lube on them, no chance.

Do we think with the much grabbier spec discs I'll be OK even if a little slings, or does it all need to come apart again. The friction material on these discs feels like metal so I don't think it will absorb any grease even if some gets on it.

Thanks in advance for any advice.

Carl Fausett 06-25-2019 10:07 AM

It does look like you may have been a bit liberal with your spline grease. Be very very stingy with that stuff. Causes more trouble than it helps.

Carl Fausett 06-25-2019 10:15 AM


https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...945f7aa6a4.jpg


I thought the splined shaft was supposed to be lubricated with the super sticky clutch grease. Did I use too much?
Yes, those track lines are very telling. You can even see where the grease landed on the friction material. I have had so much trouble with grease on the splines that I run mine dry. Dry, but clean. Have not had any issue doing that.

Petza914 06-25-2019 10:33 AM

Carl, so you're saying I probably need to pull it all apart again and remove the excess grease or will the other friction material on the discs compensate for my liberal greasing error?

Carl Fausett 06-25-2019 11:46 AM

If you are using those discs still, you can try degreasing them - I'd use carb cleaner to try to wash it out of the frictions discs. Can't guarantee it will work. Once the grease is absorbed into the NAO material, it isn't likely to come out. But you can try.

The discoloration of the spring fingers is a worry too. The clutch might be slipping because the pressure plate has weakened springs now. That bluing is pretty bad. Sorry Buddy.

Petza914 06-25-2019 11:52 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15931595)
If you are using those discs still, you can try degreasing them - I'd use carb cleaner to try to wash it out of the frictions discs. Can't guarantee it will work. Once the grease is absorbed into the NAO material, it isn't likely to come out. But you can try.

Carl, no, those greased discs are sitting on the workbench and the SPEC discs you installed are back in there that almost seem like a sintered metal material. The question is if grease from the shaft were to do the same thing on these discs would they hold or slip, and if they slip, would this type be cleanable once I took it apart again since they seem much less absorbant.

If you think the pressure plate may also be marginal, than I probably don't need any grease on the friction discs to make things worse. I never had any slipping of the clutch before - it was obvious the first time it happened here, but I checked the rear view mirror to see if maybe I had broken the rear end loose instead - no such luck.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7cc53bc796.jpg

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...afa8e4b080.jpg

Petza914 06-25-2019 04:53 PM

Compression #s

Cold engine.
Fuel pump relay out.
Coil wire off distributor.
Throttle fully open.

Range 150-158 with an average of 154 so all within about 5% of each other.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...193ececb7a.jpg

Carl Fausett 06-25-2019 06:30 PM

Nothing wrong with those numbers.

Petza914 06-25-2019 08:31 PM

Clutch has been back out, splined shaft, throwout bearing, and disc hubs wiped off (leaving only a residue of the slippery grease), then reinstalled.

I'll test drive it tomorrow to see what happens under full boost without clutch slippage!

BC 06-25-2019 09:29 PM

Fingers crossed. I have not heard of the dual disk slipping so easily with ~400

Chris Lockhart 06-26-2019 07:14 AM

Hope all goes well Pete! Thanks to your grease slinging issue, I am going to pull my clutch back out and clean most of the high pressure grease off. I obviously applied WAY too much.

Carl Fausett 06-26-2019 10:34 AM

If you lube the spines at all, all you want is a surface smear of it. Wipe it on thinly, then wipe it off, done. Leave nothing that can sling when it rotates.

Next topic is the guide tube for the throw-out bearing. Slight film of grease there may help the TOB slide, but then again, any grease collects dirt and the abrasives that fall off the clutch as it wears. So, although it may help initially, it likely gets worse as the grease gets dirty and gritty. Its a harsh environment in there. Best to follow the same rules - wipe it on and wipe it off. A very thin film is best if you lube it at all. You want nothing that will become a dirt-magnet.

Petza914 06-26-2019 10:51 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15933933)
If you lube the spines at all, all you want is a surface smear of it. Wipe it on thinly, then wipe it off, done. Leave nothing that can sling when it rotates.

Next topic is the guide tube for the throw-out bearing. Slight film of grease there may help the TOB slide, but then again, any grease collects dirt and the abrasives that fall off the clutch as it wears. So, although it may help initially, it likely gets worse as the grease gets dirty and gritty. Its a harsh environment in there. Best to follow the same rules - wipe it on and wipe it off. A very thin film is best if you lube it at all. You want nothing that will become a dirt-magnet.

That's how it went back together yesterday. I cut the cotton end off a Q-tip and used the stick part to wipe the grease out of the splines. Rolled up a paper towel and pulled it back and forth through the friction disc hubs, and wiped off the inside and out of the throwout bearing guide tube.

What remains on any of these is a surface film so they don't feel dry but you can't see any grease.

We'll give that a shot.

Petza914 06-26-2019 01:45 PM

Drove the car. Engagement and disengagement of the clutch isn't quite as smooth as it was when the splined shaft was overgreased, but seems to work fine, and most importantly, isn't slipping under boost anymore. It's possible I have some wear on my splined shaft and should probably upgrade it with one of Greg's new ones next time it comes apart, along with a new guide tube,

AFR #s:
Under full boost - 11.5 rock steady up to about 5,000 RPM
At idle - 12.5-13
Under light throttle for normal driving 13-13.5
Under vacuum (decelerating while in gear) - 14-14.5

so seems like it might be 1/2 point rich, but not bad. The KnockLink stayed green during all of the boost, higher RPM pulls.

Timing setting is also holding. A trained ear from one of the experts at Rendezvous might help me tweak this a little.

I'm losing boost again at about .4 bar so need to figure out where that's going too, but think the gasket at the metering plate for the intake shoe might be too soft and letting it escape. Will try something different there today to try and achieve a stronger seal. Heat Exchanger pump is also not running so need to free it again or figure out why, but that's not a show stopper.

Still have some oil exiting the crankcase breather system. I'm going to try and rig something up where I can connect my boost gauge to the crankcase vent line and see what kind of pressure is actually going through it. I'm also going to try one of Carl's oil control baffle plates - currently I have Hans' installed and I think Carl's has fewer openings and a different drain back design that might keep more of the oil where it's supposed to be under boost. If the pressure is pretty normal and the other baffle plate doesn't change the situation, I may have to install an AOS instead of a vent setup. Now wish I'd kept the Motorsports version of the 997 AOS I had, but since it wouldn't fit my 997, I sold it.

Overall the car runs and drives very well. Cold start worked great, Hot start fired right up. Other than the crankcase pressure / vent issue, I don't see a reason why it wouldn't make it to Atlanta, but will drive it around more today and tomorrow before making that call late Thursday. It won't be as clean and sparkly as I had planned, but I'll give it a regular wash. Wife is taking the Cayenne this weekend so I'd probably bring the RUF 997 if not the 928.

I'd like to get the 928 there though for it to be a part of the event and to let the experts like Carl take a look and see if they'd make some timing or fueling tweaks to make it even better.

Carl Fausett 06-26-2019 02:19 PM

My experience has shown that during your drive down, you will have no or nearly no emissions from your crankcase vent.
Its only under WOT that the PCV system on the 16v motor can be over-run, from about 5000 rpm and up if everything else isn't just perfect.
So, partial-throttle driving in 5th gear isn't really an issue. You will be under 3K rpm, shouldn't be a problem.

You know... about "losing boost at .4 bar" translates to just about 6 psi, which is what that kit was designed for. Hmm. When I see you I will help you diagnose it better - whether the boost is leveling off, or peaking and then dropping, I have some ideas.

Petza914 06-26-2019 02:22 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 15934558)
My experience has shown that during your drive down, you will have no or nearly no emissions from your crankcase vent.
Its only under WOT that the PCV system on the 16v motor can be over-run, from about 5000 rpm and up if everything else isn't just perfect.
So, partial-throttle driving in 5th gear isn't really an issue. You will be under 3K rpm, all good.

Good to know. I can see the vapor coming from that hose at idle, but no drips when idling. I'm going to rig up a hose to move the exit of that vent line to the rear of the car so it doesn't make the bottom all oily until we figure it out or resolve it with the other baffle plate.

Chris Lockhart 06-26-2019 02:47 PM

That's great news Pete!! Congrats. I know that's been one helluva adventure.

Rob Edwards 06-26-2019 03:04 PM


Good to know. I can see the vapor coming from that hose at idle, but no drips when idling. I'm going to rig up a hose to move the exit of that vent line to the rear of the car so it doesn't make the bottom all oily until we figure it out or resolve it with the other baffle plate.
Gatorade catch bottle and some duct tape? ;)

Petza914 06-27-2019 05:08 PM

Today's test drive went well as far as the engine is concerned. On the last turn I was in moderate boost in a fairly low speed sharp turn and afterwards had this new rattle coming from the drivetrain - the Z06 trans always had a bit of a rattle sound from the solid mounts when the clutch is out, but this is a new rattle sound and it happens whenever the car is moving. Doesn't really happen if the car is stationary whether the clutch is in or out. I'm thinking it's transmission or torque tube.

Anyone have guesses on something that is fixable tonight - shaft not fully seated in pilot bearing, thowout bearing sleeve, etc or is my pursuit of taking it to Rendezvous over?

Petza914 06-27-2019 08:15 PM

Back in business.

Pulled the lower bell housing and the two 10mm bolts that secure the guide tube had come loose even though they had lock washers on them.

Reinstalled and added flanged nuts to the other side. They're not coming loose again. Did a test drive and that noise is gone.

Changing out the break-in oil now, washing it, and headed for PEC in the morning.

olmann 06-27-2019 10:03 PM

I have been following along and must say that you have done an outstanding job! Outstanding perseverance! Makes my delays with my car before leaving look like a joke. Finished up on my car, really minor stuff, last night and I’m now halfway to Rendezvous. Looking forward to seeing your car and meeting you. Thanks for all of the updates.

Brian

Petza914 06-27-2019 11:44 PM

Thanks Brian.

I'm really looking forward to meeting all the 928 guys I see online every day and the awesome cars I've followed for years.

Oil is changed and car is washed. Ready for morning departure.

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1396808d77.jpg

Petza914 08-06-2019 09:44 PM

Picking this back up.

For those of you who made it to Rendezvous, you know I had a noise issue with the drivetrain that started when I got into Atlanta. It was very similar to the noise I had the day before leaving when the guide tube bolts came loose. I thought that happened again so once the noise started, I drove the car gingerly the rest of the way to Rendezvous.

Then with Bob Voskian's boroscope and the use of the curb at PEC as a makeshift lift, I slid under the car to see if I could get a look at the guide tube bolts to see if in fact, that was the problem.

Made for a good picture of a "shark" eating it's owner, but wasn't very effective, as I couldn't get a good look through the lower bell housing access hole.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...1327fe9a40.jpg

Not wanting to put additional miles on the car with the hopes of making it home under it's own power, or at least to get within 100 mile range for a free AAA tow, I skipped the Tech session and drive on Saturday afternoon.

Good news is that the car would only make the noise under fairly hard acceleration or when turning, so made it home on Sunday without issue.

Pulled the lower bell housing at home to find that the guide tube bolts and the lock nuts I added to the back side were still intact and nice and tight, so that was not the cause of the noise, like it seemed to be before I departed for Rendezvous.

Started doing some research on the Corvette Z06 6s-speed transaxle I have in my Spyder and discovered other Corvette owners describing a similar noise that turned out to the the differential as it was more likely to make the noise during turns, which is when my noise first appeared. So I replaced my differential fluid that was not a few years old and had maybe 15-20k miles on it, then went for a test drive.

Good news - no noise, even under heavy acceleration in corners and some full boost, higher RPM pulls.

Bad news - got back and the engine valley had about 1/8" of orange fluid sitting in it. Fluid kind of smelled like coolant, but also kind of didn't. Not thinking my fluid protocol thought when putting the car back together, I did something kind of dumb. Since the engine and radiator were completely empty from the build, I had flushed it with water, then changed from the previous green ethylene glycol coolant I had been using to newer orange Dexcool to have better anti-corrosion characteristics. Unfortunately, the windshield washer fluid I use that get gets pumped through my supercharger heat exchanger is also orange, so I then had to figure out which fluid was in my valley. Because the washer fluid gets hot when pumping through the intercooler and the washer bottle cap doesn't really seal, therse is always a slight smell of hot washer fluid with the car. Since the valley fluid didn't have a totally strong coolant smell and I smelled the washer fluid, I thought maybe I had an issue or leak with my intercooler - so took that apart and tested it. Thought maybe the lower inlet clamp was loose so tightened that when putting it back together. I dried up the orange liquid in the valley and when for another test drive.

Guess what - a new layer of orange liquid in the valley and this time I could tell it was coolant. Further inspection shows a coolant streak from the main fitting of the water bridge down the back side and into the valley - this is the large round fitting that takes a large o-ring and although I replaced the o-ring during my build, it still leaked - guess that's why when I took this off the old motor it was well coated with silicone gasket material, as this must be a known leak point.

In addition, I also saw an oil streak in the same area and it's coming from where the water bridge mates with the oil control baffle I have installed. I don't know if the crankcase pressure was forcing that out or if I didn't get the water bridge and oil fill assembly tight enough when initially installing. Hans' oil control baffle uses a nice o-ring gasket in a groove on the bottom side and then the stock gasket on the top side between it and the water bridge. I had even silicone coated the gasket when I reassembled it. Since I have to take the water bridge off again to fix the coolant leak, I'll also get to fix the oil leak at the same time.

Another contributor to the oil leak could be the pressure I'm trying to vent to atmosphere while I route the oil from that vapor back into the cam tower. The 90 degree cam tower fitting might be creating back pressure in the hose and enough of that can't escape out the vent hose and may have built up pressure in the oil baffle and water bridge junction.

Next problem is that Carl discovered I was only running on 7 cylinders when he listened to my car at Rendezvous, and when I pulled the plugs, sure enough, #7 didn't look good and #5 didn't look much better. When I returned from Rendezvous, I pulled the plugs, so these have about 250 miles on them.


https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...8c7830fbc9.jpg
x
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...38b3edd8e3.jpg




I reinstalled a set of copper, triple electrode Bosch plugs in the same heat range to see if they would run longer between fouling. These are factory gapped at .030 which is a little on the open side, but at the top end of the acceptable 928 range. These are the plugs that were in the car for the couple of test drives when I discovered the coolant leak and tested whether the differential fluid change resolved the drivetrain noise, so had about 40 miles on them.

Pulled them out and same exact coloring, so have a problem with 5 and/or 7.

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5364eae466.jpg
x
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b556beaff9.jpg
xx
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...912157378d.jpg


Since my compression test was good cold and dry - 150-160 psi in all cylinders, I'm assuming the problem is likely fuel and/or spark on those two cylinders.

So, I've now installed another new set of NGK BR8ES plugs gapped at .028. I've also swapped the 2 new fuel injectors for these cylinders with 2 of the non-rubber contaminated ones from my 4.5L engine that ran great. I also removed the new Magnecore ignition wires I had installed and reinstalled the set from my 4.5L motor. With new plugs, different injectors, and different ignition wires, if this set gets colored the same way, then I likely have bigger engine issues and will have to do a leak-down test to see if that sheds any light, but I'm hoping maybe I'm good now.

When I get my next block of time, I'll be pulling the water bridge, installing Carl's oil control baffle and sealing the coolant tube and O-ring with silicone and putting it all back together, but I need to resolve my oil venting issue as well since my vent line is dripping actual oil and not just evacuating vapor....

Kevin in Atlanta 08-06-2019 10:54 PM

Not sure this applies to your engine, but my 87 had similar fouling on #8 and it was due to a stuck piston ring. The engine in question sat under a tarp for years before I acquired it. The bores looked perfect so I saw no need to pull the pistons - that was a fatal mistake that resulted in a broken rod and trashed engine.

Hope I'm wrong.

Petza914 08-06-2019 11:08 PM

The previous post got long, so starting a new one for the oil vapor / crankcase venting project.

I need a more effective setup for the crankcase ventilation and think the current setup has a couple issues.

Issue #1 is that the line that should return the separated oil droplets back into the cam tower has a 90 degree fitting at the cam tower and the pressure coming through that line hitting the 90 degree bend is forcing oil seepage out of the fitting there and it's oozing along the ridge of the cam tower.

Issue #2 is that I think this 90 degree bend may backing up the line with pressure that's not allowing the pressurized vapor coming from the crankcase to exit efficiently and that may be a contributor to the oil leak on the water bridge and oil baffle plate.

The way the current setup is designed to work, the crankcase vent line goes to the left side of the oil fill canister assembly that has a solid cylinder in it now to help separate the oil from the vapor. The vapor then exits out the right side of the oil fill cap and oil that is separated should run down the hose and into the cam tower, while the pressurized vapor goes out the stainless line and vents to atmosphere underneath the car.

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...f39cb15923.jpg


https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...029908711b.jpg

...except, I'm getting oil droplets out the vapor evacuation line. It was enough to spray Ron's windshield with a light coating over just a few miles while he was following me.

So, I started looking into oil catch-cans and air/oil separators to better manage the vapor flow and separation of the oil from the vapor. Ideally I wanted an AOS and not a catch-can so that it wouldn't have to be emptied periodically and the separated oil can just return to the motor.

The challenge with this type of setup is that the drain fitting on the bottom of the AOS has to be higher than the drain back point so the oil can flow down back into the motor. It is very difficult to find an effective and compact AOS that would fit in the open area on the driver's side firewall but still allow a downward flow back into the cam tower, but I thought I found a couple.

I read very positive reviews on the IAG Competition AOS and the Perrin AOS. One of the problems with some AOS units is that when used in cold weather, because of condensation during engine warm up going through the AOS, then mixing with the oil, it creates a foam that then clogs up the drain line and the AOS making a mess and killing it's functionality. There are some good photos of this issue that some people have had with the Grimmspeed AOS, which looked compact enough to actually work for my application :( The solution to the foaming and clogging problem is to heat the AOS so that even in cold weather, it allows the oil (and condensation) to flow and not clog up the drain lines and the AOS itself. This is cleverly accomplished by the better AOS units having ports that circulate warm coolant from the motor, through a chambered off section of the AOS to keep the AOS unit warm. This is why I liked the IAG & Perrin units, but unfortunately, after contacting those companies for dimensions, no way they would fit.in my selected location.

Now that I knew what some of the important features I wanted for my AOS were, I had just about given up and resigned myself to using a simple catch-can rather than an AOS but then came across a unit from Verus Engineering used primarily with Miata race cars. It was compact, had a warming coolant cavity, had an optional drain kit available and looked like it would fit where I wanted it to, so I ordered one with the coolant kit and the drain kit from Eric at Verus, who was super responsive to my initial request for information and my follow-up questions.

https://www.verus-engineering.com/pr...r-nd-mx5-miata

The Verus unit is designed to supplement a normal PCV system so has inlet ports for crankcase ventilation and the PCV line, then outlets back to the intake manifold and the bottom drain line back to the oil reservoir. If you examine the internals of the unit, it's actually a dual-chamber setup with inlets and outlets to the non-connected sides, so really two AOS units in a single housing. It is offered in 3 anodized colors. I almost went with the red, but it's a different color red than the rest of my powdercoated engine parts and was also on backorder, so went for the black version instead. Here are the units opened up where you can see the dual chamber design with the chamber shape that slows the air and takes it through the stainless mesh to separate the oil from the vapor.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/b...b4cb0~mv2.webp


In my 928 application, I only need to vent the 1 crankcase line through the AOS, so I'm going to split the line into two inputs to the AOS with a Y or T connector - one into each inlet chamber of the AOS (either both outside ports or both inside ports) - and have dual outlets venting to atmosphere.

One of the reasons I chose the driver's side firewall for the fitment is because my heat exchanger to intercooler fluid line runs right under there already. I'm going to T into that line for the fluid inlet to the AOS and outlet from the AOS so rather than creating a breach in my cooling system which could an additional point of failure for a critical engine subsystem, I'm going to use the intercooler fluid, which isn't critical as the car and supercharger will run fine without any fluid should a leak develop, it just won't generate as much boost by not cooling the charge air. The Ts in the fluid line will allow the majority of the fluid to pass straight through the larger 3/4" hose while a little bit gets routed up the 5/16" hoses to the chamber in the AOS.then back out. The larger through fittings will keep most of the fluid passing straight to the intercooler where the volume moving through is important. Routing it only up through the chamber in the AOS would compromise or restrict the fluid flow through the intercooler.

Here's what that separate chamber in the back of the AOS looks like.

https://static.wixstatic.com/media/b...85ba70~mv2.jpg

I've figured out the location and mounting position. First I took a stencil of the back cover for the AOS in the center and am going to mount it using 3 studs in the center V bolt holes. Once I made the stencil, I taped it to the firewall so I could get the AOS as high as possible, but have the drain valve and body clear everything in that area.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...d8a8da57c3.jpg


Then I used a punch to mark the holes, reached through the backside of that wall to be sure my drill wasn't going to hit anything and drilled the clearance holes for the M6 bolts I'd be using.

In order to create clearance between the AOS body and firewall for the curves in the wall, I used two T-nuts threaded onto a stud. Since I didn't have studs long enough, I first threaded on an M6x1.0 die, then screwed the T-nuts onto long M6 stainless bolts, put some loctite on the threads, then screwed the bolt into the AOS, then tightened the T-nuts against the cover plate of the AOS. After the bolt and T-nuts were tight, I cut off the end of the bolt using a cut-off wheel and then worked the die back off the screw to clean up the threads so I would be able to easily screw a nut onto that end once I pass them through the holes I drilled in the firewall. Using the T-nuts as the standoffs allowed me to secure the back cover to the AOS just like the original button head screws did, which is important, as there will be fluid flowing through that cavity and I don't want it to leak.

Here's what that assembled setup looks like with the banjo fittings for the intercooler fluid line and the dual T-nut stand-offs installed.

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5c77d0554b.jpg
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...36130aa9e7.jpg


Here it is positioned in the holes but not fully installed yet as I'm going to do my hose connections and routing before fastening it to the wall, but need to wait for all the fittings to arrive before I do that.


https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...98289df6a4.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7bc594c933.jpg


As it turns out, I'm not comfortable that the bottom drain fitting is high enough to drain the oil back into the cam tower bolt so I'm going to tie in into the hose that runs from the oil filler assembly down the front of the motor into the metal line that feeds into the oil pan. The Verus AOS seems to be a well though out design as the drain kit also includes a 1-way check valve. It's installed so any pressure from the crankcase or oil pan back into the AOS drain line can't force oil back into the AOS, but when the car is not running the check valve drops open so accumulated oil can run back into the pan.

The plumbing is going to look like this.
  • 22mm cranckase vent hose feeds the inlet to the oil fill assembly just as it does today, but the 24mm oil cap outlet hose will now be split into two 12mm lines running to the two AOS inlet ports - either both outside or both inside ports. BTW, if by looking at the internals of the AOS, if anyone has any advice as to whether the inlets should be the two outer ports or the tow inner ports, please let me know. I'm also thinking about capping off the oil fill inlet port and venting the 22mm cranckase vent line directly to the AOS after splitting it which will eliminate further crankcase pressure by not putting that back into the oil fill port. Which is the better configuration?
  • Two 12mm outlets from the AOS will Y together into a single 22mm line and vent to atmosphere down the driver's side firewall, just like the current line does. This hoses will be fire-sleeved since it runs in the vacinity of the header on that side
  • The 3/4 heat exchanger to intercooler fluid hose will be T'd so the 3/4" line continues through but has a 5/16" offshoot to the fluid cavity banjo fitting barbs on the back of the AOS
  • The 10mm AOS oil drain line with the 1-way check valve in it will exit the bottom of the AOS with a 90 degree open curve fitting Varus supplied, go around the back side of the drivers side cam tower, then come through the wireway space in the timing covers on that side of the motor and Y into the rubber line that feeds the oil return to the pan.

I'm looking for input on the 2 red items above or any additional suggestions or comments if anyone has any. I'm hoping once I get this setup installed and the coolant and oil leak taken care of that the car is back in business so I can enjoy some beautiful top-down driving as the cooler weather approaches.

Petza914 08-06-2019 11:12 PM


Originally Posted by Kevin in Atlanta (Post 16023357)
Not sure this applies to your engine, but my 87 had similar fouling on #8 and it was due to a stuck piston ring. The engine in question sat under a tarp for years before I acquired it. The bores looked perfect so I saw no need to pull the pistons - that was a fatal mistake that resulted in a broken rod and trashed engine.

Hope I'm wrong.

I hope you're wrong too - yikes. Wouldn't a stuck ring result in poor compression in that cylinder or do the other rings compensate for that and make a good seal for compression. Since this engine sat for a bit before I installed it, I actually put some Marvel Mystery Oil into the top of each cylinder through the plug hole to give it some top end lubrication and help anything that might be stuck, get unstuck before starting.

I'm hoping it was bad injectors or plug wires, but I guess we'll see. Not sure I have the heart, nor the funds to start this process over again.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 08-06-2019 11:33 PM

Pete, you are a stud!! Great work and great perseverance! I know you will get it worked out. Wonderful attention to detail, as usual.
Dave

Carl Fausett 08-07-2019 11:02 AM

I'll be interested to see how that Versus separator works out.

SwayBar 08-08-2019 05:33 PM

Usually when there's pressure in the crankcase and blowing oil, it's indicative of excessive blowby. The pressure has to go somewhere and it's thru the seals and fittings.

Hopefully it's not the case for your engine though.

Perhaps you can rig up a pressure guage to measure the crankcase pressure to rule that out.

Petza914 08-08-2019 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by SwayBar (Post 16027014)
Usually when there's pressure in the crankcase and blowing oil, it's indicative of excessive blowby. The pressure has to go somewhere and it's thru the seals and fittings.

Hopefully it's not the case for your engine though.

Perhaps you can rig up a pressure guage to measure the crankcase pressure to rule that out.

How would I test for that? Isn't blowby caused by combustion pressure getting past the rings and into the crankcase? and if so, wouldn't that mean compression in that or those cylinders would be compromised? The compression test I did looked good with all cylinders between 150-160. Would a leak down test be more telling and if so, how is one of those performed? I believe I have to get each cylinder to TDC, pressurize them and then see what the leakage rate is. Is that correct?

Any other tests I can do?

Thanks.

Petza914 08-08-2019 07:18 PM

I had another thought here. If you look at the way the current crankcase ventilation and oil recovery system is setup, the crankcase vent gasses should separate from the oil with the gas escaping out the vent to atmosphere and the condensed oil flowing back into the driver's side cam tower via the 90 degree fitting.

It just occurred to me that the two plugs that are fouling 5 & 7 are on the same side that this oil return line is on. Is it possible that it's the oil being returned this way that's fouling those plugs, or at least the #5 plug. Seems with this theory that 6 would also get fouled, and it isn't, but maybe the air flow inside the cam tower moves the oil to the left and right.

The new AOS setup will route the returning oil back to the pan instead of to the cam tower. Might that keep these plugs cleaner?

I'm also thinking that instead of splitting just the crankcase vent line that maybe I'll run that directly into one of the AOS ports and run vent lines from the two cam towers into the other AOS input line or would ports on the cam towers create vacuum as opposed to pressure as I don't want to suck any of the stainless mesh in the AOS that helps to separate the oil into the cam tower.

Current venting setup looks like this.

Also, am I better off running the crankcase vent line that goes into the passenger side of the oil fill assembly directly to the AOS and capping off that port on the oil fill assembly, or running it into the oil fill assembly as it is now and then sending the output line from the other side of the oil fill assembly to the AOS? I'm wondering if I'm just recirculating some of the pressure coming from the crankcase vent line to the oil pan via the oil fill assembly the way it is now.

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a30ebb0b7a.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b6ceef86c1.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...6bbac10072.jpg

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 08-08-2019 08:37 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 16027061)
How would I test for that? Isn't blowby caused by combustion pressure getting past the rings and into the crankcase? and if so, wouldn't that mean compression in that or those cylinders would be compromised? The compression test I did looked good with all cylinders between 150-160. Would a leak down test be more telling and if so, how is one of those performed? I believe I have to get each cylinder to TDC, pressurize them and then see what the leakage rate is. Is that correct?

Any other tests I can do?

Thanks.

Hi Pete,
You can measure crankcase pressure by putting a Mityvac pressure gauge in the dipstick hole. The rest, I don;t know about, but I did this on my car.
Good luck,
Dave

belgiumbarry 08-08-2019 08:59 PM

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...31e527f414.jpg
for what i know, every engine has blowby and with a supercharger it only get's worse. Sure on engines of 30 years old… Seen it on so many BMW's ….. myself , i had a supercharger installed on a BMW 850i with only 6 /7 PSI boost to see the sump gasket leaking …. a lot ! ( and i'm not alone, others had the same problem )…. instead of "gambling" with new gaskets, i installed a Moroso vacuum pump ( belt driven ) and a catch tank . Works perfect … instead of oil leaks it just suck air in now.
PS Catch tank is a "big" one , with a air/oil separator as used with dry sumps tanks. There i can drain the "milky" residue of oil/water condens... bit of oil is not bad , even needed to lubricate the pump.
I don't go in high vacuum as dragsters use to do for HP gain… there you can affect oil pressure and needs special adaptions. I dialed it in at 100 gr engine vacuum , just enough to keep sump at vac and no more oil leaks. My race shop tryed it at high vac for rally cars and there's even danger of sucking in oil seals !!

https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...7e1c744a38.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...2a18e9a44d.jpg

Petza914 08-21-2019 12:45 PM

Over the past few weeks, I removed the water bridge and oil fill assembly and reinstalled them with sealant instead of gaskets this time. Not using gaskets on the sides of the water bridge will allow the center fitting with the large o-ring to sit deeper in the opening. I test fit it with gaskets and without and with the gaskets, I can actually rock it back and forth slightly. Without gaskets, the bottom circle of the water bridge rests on the machined lip in the female housing and it doesn't rock at all. I also added a little sealant around this lip and around the o-ring before I assembled it.

For the oil fill assembly, I've now installed Carl's 928MS Oil Control Baaffle Plate and put those assemblies together with gasket sealant as well. My previous oil leak in this area was coming out between the gasket above Han's oil control baffle and the base of the oil fill housing. The gasket used there was an OEM one. Because the water bridge is a little lower now (no gaskets) and I've added height to the oil fill assembly with the addition of Carl's baffle plate, I wanted to make sure the oil fill assembly wasn't interfering with the water bridge not seating correctly and using only sealant as the gasket between the pieces, there is no interference.

I then continued on with the installation of the Verus AOS and all that remains is to run the vent outlets to atmosphere, but because of the hose turns, needed to pickup a couple springs to slip inside so the hoses make a nice bend instead of kinking and narrowing.

Captions for the photos are below each picture


https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...17ddbb6740.jpg
Passenger Side Cam Tower Vent connection



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...50735895ac.jpg
Driver's side Cam Tower vent. This one and the one from the passenger side Y together and then enter one input port of the dual chamber AOS. The metal connector is a one-way check valve to make sure none of the stainless mess separation media in the AOS can be sucked back into one of the cam towers. These hoses should have pressure all the time and never vacuum, but better safe than sorry.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...97d3ba3399.jpg
Crankcase Vent line. This now wraps around the front of the oil fill assembly instead of connecting to it. I was concerned that the pressure coming from that hose was just recycling back into the oiling system and adding more pressure so now the vent line is completely separate and I capped off both the inlet and outlet ports from the oil fill cap.



https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...68a9ccfd4d.jpg
This is the crankcase vent line wrapping around the oil fill housing then running under the spider legs and into the other inlet of the dual chamber AOS. There's a 1-way check valve in this line too.



https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...b2ef9a7431.jpg
Here is the AOS mounted on the fire wall with both lines installed into the inlets for each chamber



https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...403f41c398.jpg
Running underneath the AOS is the line from my heat exchanger to my intercooler for the supercharger. I added 2 Ts to this line with hoses that run to the rear chamber on the AOS. What this does is allow the hot intercooler fluid to heat the AOS so the oil that gets separated doesn't congeal when it's cold and clog up the oil drain line. This fluid compartment is machined as a separate chamber in the AOS so no risk of contamination back into the oiling system.



https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...0e2b5a0751.jpg
Coming out the bottom of the AOS is a 90 degree curved elbow that is the drain port. This is where the separated oil exits and runs back to the oil pan. This picture shows the 1-way check valve that came with the AOS drain kit so when there is positive pressure in the oiling system, it closes off and doesn't let that back feed into the AOS. When the car is turned off, that oil will use gravity to drain the line back to the oil pan.



https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...5626dea295.jpg
Here's a close-up of the drain fitting. It's tied into the line from the oil fill chamber down the front of the engine into the oil pan. The drain line is the 90 degree fitting coming in from the side.



https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...09276dc918.jpg
Here's a wider angle view.

The atmosphere vent lines will be connected to the two outlet ports from the AOS, Y'd together to a single vent line that runs down the drivers side engine compartment wall near the power steering hoses. Because both the oil drain line and the atmosphere vent line will be in the same area as the driver's side header, I fire-sleeved both those lines with DEI Fire Sleeve to keep the heat away from the rubber lines. I also used about an 8" leftover piece on the passenger side Cam Tower vent line where it lays across the backside of the supercharger.

The only thought I had after writing this post was that if I'm producing a fair amount of oil, the check valve for the drain line might be too close to the AOS and I may need to relocate it closer to the connection back to the oil pan so I can use the capacity of the drain hose upstream of the check valve to capture the separated oil.



For those of you who know what you're doing, does this seem like it's going to work properly as I envisioned it would or would you change parts of how it's done. Thanks.

Carl Fausett 08-21-2019 01:47 PM

Your installation is very workman-like and correct. Whether it will work or not is up to that Air-Oil separator you have installed. I am not familiar with that model and I'm a little concerned how good it can be at what it is supposed to do in such a small package. If it works - that'd be great, as the AOS's that currently work well are all really big. I's love to hear that there is a smaller alternative on the market that works.

Have you ever put a boost gauge on the dipstick tube and driven the car? This would tell us whether there is a wee bit of boost in the crankcase or a whole lot of it...

Petza914 08-21-2019 01:53 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Fausett (Post 16053066)
Your installation is very workman-like and correct. Whether it will work or not is up to that Air-Oil separator you have installed. I am not familiar with that model and I'm a little concerned how good it can be at what it is supposed to do in such a small package. If it works - that'd be great, as the AOS's that currently work well are all really big. I's love to hear that there is a smaller alternative on the market that works.

Have you ever put a boost gauge on the dipstick tube and driven the car? This would tell us whether there is a wee bit of boost in the crankcase or a whole lot of it...

Carl, thanks for the confirmation on the install - glad I don't have to do a lot of replumbing at this stage.

No, I've not measured crankcase pressure at the dip stick. That's difficult for me to do since I have a dipstick extender installed onto my dipstick so I can easily check the oil around the supercharger.

If it works, I'm assuming I'll get no to very little oil out of the atmosphere vent line from the AOS exit ports. If it doesn't, then I'll see oil coming out like I was previously, correct?

Carl Fausett 08-21-2019 03:31 PM


If it works, I'm assuming I'll get no to very little oil out of the atmosphere vent line from the AOS exit ports. If it doesn't, then I'll see oil coming out like I was previously, correct?
Correct. I would think that the it will be somewhere in-between. I think you are likely to see some improvement, but not a completely oil-less emission. It will be up to you to decide whether it is good enough.

Petza914 08-21-2019 07:05 PM

Well, now I think I'm officially screwed. Was buttoning up the AOS install with the vent lines, went to refill the cooling system using my AirLift and the first time it pulled vacuum to 20 which is borderline on the gauge for a proper full refill, but wouldn't go further. Shutting of the valve, it wasn't holding vacuum, but this sometimes happens when you can't get a good seal at the reservoir so I proceeded anyway and it still pulled most of the coolant from the bucket. Pulled vacuum a second time to try and finish the job and this time it only got to 10 on the gauge and I could hear air leaking from somewhere in the motor. Got my pressure tester and pressurized the cooling system to 10 and the engine valley started to fill with coolant again, but this time, it wasn't coming from the front water bridge. I couldn't detect where the coolant stream was coming from. Checked the rear HVAC fitting and opposite side block off plates and those bolts could've been tighter but the plate and fitting were dry around them.

Then I saw it.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a29699f448.jpg


This is coolant leaking between the head and the block, right?

So another blown head gasket? What's odd is that this is on Passenger side, which is the opposite one to the side where I had the 2 plugs getting fouled (that was #s 5 & 7) and this leak is between 2 and 3. Could this be what was causing excessive crankcase pressure and causing my other issues?



If that's what this is, I'm sad to say I'm probably done with this car for a while and will just put it away until looking at it stops making me cry.

If this is something simpler than that to correct, then please let me know. Kevin Berez, are you looking for an engine rebuild project to do in your spare time? If so, shoot me an email and let me know what you'd charge to take it apart and put it back together, but it's unlikely I have the funds to proceed with that project currently.

Petza914 08-21-2019 08:45 PM


Originally Posted by Petza914 (Post 16053738)
Well, now I think I'm officially screwed. Was buttoning up the AOS install with the vent lines, went to refill the cooling system using my AirLift and the first time it pulled vacuum to 20 which is borderline on the gauge for a proper full refill, but wouldn't go further. Shutting of the valve, it wasn't holding vacuum, but this sometimes happens when you can't get a good seal at the reservoir so I proceeded anyway and it still pulled most of the coolant from the bucket. Pulled vacuum a second time to try and finish the job and this time it only got to 10 on the gauge and I could hear air leaking from somewhere in the motor. Got my pressure tester and pressurized the cooling system to 10 and the engine valley started to fill with coolant again, but this time, it wasn't coming from the front water bridge. I couldn't detect where the coolant stream was coming from. Checked the rear HVAC fitting and opposite side block off plates and those bolts could've been tighter but the plate and fitting were dry around them.

Then I saw it.

https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlis...a29699f448.jpg


This is coolant leaking between the head and the block, right?

So another blown head gasket? What's odd is that this is on Passenger side, which is the opposite one to the side where I had the 2 plugs getting fouled (that was #s 5 & 7) and this leak is between 2 and 3. Could this be what was causing excessive crankcase pressure and causing my other issues?



If that's what this is, I'm sad to say I'm probably done with this car for a while and will just put it away until looking at it stops making me cry.

If this is something simpler than that to correct, then please let me know. Kevin Berez, are you looking for an engine rebuild project to do in your spare time? If so, shoot me an email and let me know what you'd charge to take it apart and put it back together, but it's unlikely I have the funds to proceed with that project currently.

May have jumped the gun on the prognosis.

I thought maybe the vacuum diaphragm in the photo was blocking my view of the fitting that feeds the heater core and that it was leaking and running along that ridge, so I removed the diaphragm and repressurized a little, and it wasn't coming from there, but was wet in the same spot again. Then looking further right, I saw coolant running around the #1 spark plug boot so there's definitely a leak at that water bridge fitting I put together with silicone but no gasket, so I have to take the water bridge off again and use gaskets, and then see where I am on the next test.

Can I test the system without coolant and listen for air leaks or is it not the same as pressurizing with coolant.

j.kenzie@sbcglobal.net 08-21-2019 10:26 PM

I would think you could pressurize with air then use soapy water to look for leaks might work. Fingers crossed its something simple.
Good luck,
Dave

Mrmerlin 08-21-2019 10:44 PM

Pete if I read this correctly I would suggest you drain the block then remove the hoses to the WB then remove the WB
take out the fat rubber seal then set the WB on your engine an use a flashlight to see what the gaps are at each head
if the heads have been cut then the angle has changed at the WB mating surface
use a feeler gauge to determine the gaps
if your careful you can surface the WB mating surface to meet the head
put some sticky on a 180 grit paper onto a flat surface an work the surface angle so each side is fitting flat then use a gasket with with some RTV

Kevin in Atlanta 08-21-2019 11:18 PM

If you can tell which edge is leaking you could shave a gasket to match the gap. Removing metal is irreversible - go too far and you're forked.

If you are going to shave the water bridge I would suggest getting a 1/2" thick piece of tempered glass, wrap the 180 grit around it and work the water bridge back and forth. This is same thing I do for 85-86 oil fillers that leak. Better control.

Good luck.

karl ruiter 08-21-2019 11:19 PM

You can probably test with air, but keep in mind that air will sometimes leak in cases where water will not.

Petza914 08-22-2019 01:16 PM

Thanks everyone.

The first time I assembled it a few months ago with the side gaskets, the sides didn't leak, it was the center fitting with the large o-ring that did. So I took it apart the other day and reassembled it without any gaskets, using just red sealant on all the mating surfaces, including around the bottom circle of the large round center fitting and around the o-ring goove, in addition to the o-ring. That's when the center section was good and the passenger side leaked.

So last night, had another one of my up until 3 AM work sessions, took it all apart again, removed all the sealant - that stuff bonds so well, how it leaks is beyond me - and put it all back together using both things that worked on each part from the 2 previous times. I now have gaskets on the sides with a smear of sealant on them, along with sealant in the o-ring groove, plus the o-ring, and around the bottom flange where it goes it. I'm letting the sealant setup for the recommended 24 hours and am then going to pressurize the system before adding any coolant to see if it holds pressure.

I think I might also have a leak at the rear passenger side fitting where it goes to the heater core hose, but when I removed the bolts to take it off and redo it, it was bonded so well from the first installation (gasket plus sealant) that I decided to leave it alone and put the bolts back in. That one I can access much easier if I need to change it if it's leaking without having to do a whole bunch of disassembly and I only had 2 of the trapezoidal gaskets on hand that I needed to use on the front bridge. We'll see what happens and I can order a couple more gaskets from Roger and fit that fitting next week if it turns out to be leaking.

Also, unless the head gasket is leaking right there in my previous picture, I don't think there is an easy way for the rear fitting to put coolant there. My car currently has the front wheels on ramps so it's canted backwards. Seems more likely that the front leak may have run rearward along that ridge than the back leak running uphill to get to that area, but we'll see. It's also possible that I do in fact have a failed head gasket in that area and the coolant was coming out from the head to block junction.

For those of you with experience, does that happen, or does the leak usually happen internally like when my 4.5L motor overheated and blew the head gasket, putting coolant into the cylinders.

Petza914 08-23-2019 12:03 AM

Went to pull a vacuum on the 928 and it won't hold vacuum. The hissing sounds like it's coming from the same joint on the water bridge that I tried to repair last night, so the bridge must not be seating to the block well enough to seal.Gonna have to take it apart again and work on how those parts mate as Kevin and Stan have suggested. Both my wife and some believe the sound is coming from that area, which means it's probably not the head gasket, but we'll see.

This is fun.

928 GT R 08-23-2019 12:51 AM

Try listening with a stethoscope (with the head removed) to micro locate the hissing sound...

Bulvot 08-23-2019 01:47 AM

If you're up for a new tool, I recommend an ultrasonic leak detector. I have this one and find it to be invaluable:

INFICON 711-202-G1 Whisper Ultrasonic Leak Detector

You can use it in loud environments, on tiny leaks, etc.


All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:56 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands